Curing Adhesives Market by Adhesive Type (Acrylic, Cyanoacrylate, Epoxy), Curing Technology (Anaerobic, Heat, Moisture), Form Factor, End Use Industry, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Curing Adhesives Market was valued at USD 18.19 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 19.44 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.53%, reaching USD 32.54 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction to curing adhesives highlighting technological evolution, performance priorities, supply chain dynamics, and cross‑industry relevance
Curing adhesives have become a central enabler of modern assembly and manufacturing. As material engineers and process leads seek reliable joining solutions that meet higher performance and sustainability thresholds, curing chemistries and application processes have evolved to satisfy a more exacting set of functional and regulatory requirements. This introduction synthesizes the role of curing adhesives across industries, framing their technical attributes, process considerations, and strategic importance for stakeholders who must balance performance, cost, and compliance.
Over recent years, the value proposition of curing adhesives has extended beyond bond strength to include service life under environmental stress, compatibility with advanced substrates, and integration with automation. These shifts have elevated the role of adhesives teams from incremental suppliers to strategic collaborators in product development, influencing material selection, assembly sequencing, and in-line quality assurance practices. At the same time, supply chain dynamics and raw material availability have introduced new constraints and choices for formulators and buyers.
Consequently, technology roadmaps for curing adhesives now prioritize cross-cutting objectives: achieving reliable cure in constrained process windows, reducing volatile organic compounds, enabling lower-temperature processing, and designing for end-of-life considerations. This introduction establishes the context for deeper analysis by outlining the key technical drivers and organizational implications that shape adoption and innovation across sectors.
Transformative forces reshaping the curing adhesives landscape through sustainability mandates, digital integration, novel chemistries, and agile production
The landscape for curing adhesives is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging forces in sustainability, digitalization, and materials science. Sustainability mandates are compelling formulators to reduce solvent dependence, increase use of low-emission chemistries, and explore recyclability-aware adhesive strategies. Concurrently, digital process integration-spanning sensor-enabled curing stations, predictive process controls, and digital twins-has enabled more consistent cure outcomes and shorter qualification cycles, altering how teams validate assemblies.
In parallel, advances in polymer chemistry and photoinitiators have expanded options for low-temperature or rapid-cure processes that align with sensitive substrates and high-throughput lines. These novel chemistries reduce thermal stress on components and enable new assembly architectures. Moreover, supply chain decentralization and localized manufacturing are prompting suppliers to rethink distribution and formulation flexibility to serve variable production footprints.
As a result of these forces, business models are shifting toward service-led propositions where technical support, co-development, and lifecycle management become differentiators. Regulatory complexity is accelerating product stewardship programs and compliance-driven innovation, creating a feedback loop between end users and adhesive developers. Together, these trends are redefining how curing adhesive solutions are specified, validated, and scaled across industrial and medical applications.
Cumulative impact of U.S. tariff measures on curing adhesive supply chains, raw material sourcing, cost structures, and strategic supplier reconfiguration
Recent U.S. tariff measures have introduced a sequence of operational and strategic responses across the curing adhesive ecosystem without altering the underlying technical requirements of formulations. At the most immediate level, tariffs influence the economics of raw material sourcing and the relative attractiveness of regional suppliers. In response, procurement teams are increasingly mapping supplier risk, diversifying source lists, and engaging in longer-term supply agreements to create predictable input streams. These responses are reshaping negotiation dynamics and supplier selection criteria.
Moreover, tariffs have amplified incentives for domestic production and local formulation adaptation. Chemical manufacturers and formulators evaluate re-shoring or near-shoring of key intermediate processes to mitigate tariff exposure and shorten lead times. This reconfiguration of supply chains is rarely immediate; it involves capital allocation, regulatory approvals, and workforce development, yet it alters long-term strategic planning and portfolio prioritization.
Finally, the cumulative policy environment influences product strategy and pricing discussions across value chains. Brands and OEMs re-evaluate total cost of ownership, specification flexibility, and alternative chemistries that rely on more readily available feedstocks. While tariffs do not change performance requirements, they do change the calculus around supplier partnerships, inventory strategies, and technical trade-offs. Consequently, organizations must consider policy-driven supply risk as part of technology roadmaps and procurement governance without assuming it will permanently substitute technical judgment.
Segmentation-driven insights into adhesive chemistries, curing technologies, form factors, end use verticals, and application routes to guide R&D and go-to-market
A rigorous segmentation lens clarifies where technical priorities and commercial strategies intersect across adhesive types, curing technologies, form factors, end use industries, and applications. When considering adhesive type, analysts observe distinct development paths for acrylics, cyanoacrylates, epoxies, silicones, and urethanes. Acrylics deserve attention for their division between solvent based and water based formulations, each addressing different regulatory and performance constraints. Cyanoacrylates are characterized by variations such as modified and standard grades, with modified versions engineered for enhanced impact or temperature resistance. Silicone technology is nuanced by cure chemistry, notably acid cure and neutral cure variants that influence substrate compatibility and odor or corrosion considerations.
Curing technology is another critical axis, encompassing anaerobic, heat, moisture, radiation, and UV processes. These modalities impose specific process controls and equipment footprints, and they determine which substrates and assembly environments are viable. Form factor plays an equally central role; adhesives delivered as film, liquid, paste, or powder create different material handling, dispensing, and storage requirements that affect line design and quality assurance.
End use industry segmentation spans aerospace, automotive, construction, electronics and electrical, medical devices, and packaging. Within electronics and electrical, further distinctions are useful between consumer electronics, industrial electronics, and telecommunications due to differing reliability and thermal management expectations. Finally, application segmentation-bonding, coating, encapsulating, laminating, and sealing-links directly to functional specification, testing protocols, and lifecycle performance criteria. Taken together, these segmentation axes provide a multi-dimensional framework for prioritizing product development and go-to-market decisions.
Regional dynamics across Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific focusing on supply resilience, regulatory divergence, innovation, and demand
Regional dynamics strongly influence where curing adhesive innovation, production, and adoption concentrate, each region presenting distinct regulatory, logistical, and commercial characteristics. In the Americas, supply chain resilience and proximity to automotive and aerospace hubs shape procurement choices and incentivize formulations that meet varied climatic and regulatory regimes. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency and a pronounced focus on sustainability elevate demand for low-emission chemistries, while regional industrial diversity fosters both specialized high-performance solutions and cost-sensitive products.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization, strong electronics manufacturing clusters, and significant capacity in chemical production create both demand and supply advantages. This region often leads in process innovation geared toward high-volume consumer electronics and telecommunications assemblies. Transitional dynamics are common: manufacturing footprints shift in response to labor cost pressures, trade policies, and regional investments in advanced manufacturing capabilities.
Taken together, these regional distinctions guide strategic decisions around inventory allocation, technical support networks, and local formulation variants. Companies that align product portfolios and service models with the operational realities and regulatory frameworks of each region gain advantages in rollout speed, customer trust, and long-term resilience.
Corporate insights into strategies of adhesive manufacturers and suppliers emphasizing portfolio evolution, partnerships, consolidation, and R&D priorities
Company-level strategies reflect an interplay between technological leadership and commercial execution. Market participants increasingly differentiate by integrating formulation expertise with application engineering, offering not just adhesive products but also process optimization services and qualification support. This combination positions suppliers to co-develop solutions with OEMs, accelerating adoption when technical alignment is achieved early in product lifecycles. Strategic moves such as portfolio rationalization, targeted acquisitions, and collaborations with equipment providers are visible as firms seek to offer end-to-end solution packages that reduce customer friction.
Investment in R&D remains a primary vector of competitive advantage, with emphasis on low-temperature cures, hybrid chemistries, and photoinitiator systems that expand substrate compatibility. Organizations are also deploying tiered product strategies that balance high-performance grades for mission-critical applications with cost-effective variants tailored for volume manufacturing. In parallel, improvements in application equipment, dispensing accuracy, and inline cure monitoring are becoming value propositions that complement chemical offerings.
Additionally, corporate responses to regulatory trends and supply chain uncertainty include greater transparency on raw material provenance, increased use of secondary sourcing strategies, and the development of region-specific formulations. These shifts underscore the importance of nimble commercialization, robust technical service, and proactive stakeholder engagement in sustaining competitive positioning.
Practical recommendations for industry leaders to adopt advanced curing solutions, fortify supply chains, embed sustainability, and accelerate strategic collaborations
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions that translate emerging trends into competitive advantage. First, align product development roadmaps with sustainability requirements and process constraints by accelerating the shift toward low-solvent or water-based systems where feasible, while preserving key performance attributes. Second, strengthen supply chain resilience by mapping critical intermediates, diversifying supplier relationships, and evaluating near-shore manufacturing or toll-processing arrangements to reduce geopolitical exposure.
Third, invest in digital process integration to achieve consistent cure outcomes; sensor-equipped cure stations, data analytics, and predictive maintenance reduce variability and shorten qualification cycles. Fourth, pursue partnerships across the value chain-co-development with OEMs, alliances with equipment vendors, and collaborations with material suppliers-to accelerate time-to-market for new chemistries and application systems. Fifth, build flexible go-to-market strategies that account for regional regulatory differences and customer service expectations, enabling localized formulation variants and technical support models.
Finally, embed rigorous product stewardship and regulatory monitoring into commercial processes to anticipate compliance risks and position innovations as solutions to policy-driven constraints. These recommendations are actionable and interdependent; successful implementation requires coordinated investment across R&D, procurement, and commercial teams.
Methodological framework combining expert interviews, laboratory validation, supply chain mapping, and qualitative synthesis to ensure analytical rigor, relevance
The research underpinning this analysis combines qualitative and technical approaches to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary engagements with industry experts, formulators, process engineers, and procurement leaders provided context on technology adoption, validation practices, and supplier selection criteria. Laboratory validation and technical reviews complemented these interviews, enabling the assessment of cure modalities, substrate compatibility, and handling constraints under controlled conditions.
Supply chain mapping and material flow analysis were used to trace vulnerability points and to identify strategic sourcing alternatives without relying on numerical estimations. Secondary sources and peer-reviewed literature informed the understanding of regulatory trends and material science advances, while anonymized case studies illustrated practical deployment challenges and mitigation tactics. Throughout, findings were synthesized with attention to cross-sectoral applicability and operational feasibility.
Quality controls included triangulation of findings across multiple expert inputs and verification of technical claims against laboratory evidence. The resulting methodology ensures that conclusions are grounded in observed practice, validated chemistry, and strategic considerations relevant to decision-makers across manufacturing and procurement functions.
Synthesis of curing adhesive landscape underscoring key strategic takeaways from technology trends, regulatory change, segmentation nuances, and regional dynamics
This analysis synthesizes the technical, commercial, and regional forces shaping the curing adhesives landscape and distills practical implications for stakeholders. Technological innovations are expanding the palette of cure mechanisms and formulations, enabling greater compatibility with modern substrates and low-energy process windows. At the same time, regulatory and supply chain pressures are incentivizing new approaches to formulation, sourcing, and product stewardship.
Segmentation analysis clarifies which combinations of chemistry, curing technology, form factor, and application are most relevant to particular industries, supporting more precise R&D prioritization and commercialization planning. Regional dynamics underline the importance of tailoring supply models and technical support to local regulatory regimes and manufacturing ecosystems. Company strategies that couple chemical innovation with service-led offerings and operational flexibility are better positioned to capture value across evolving end markets.
In short, the convergence of chemistry innovation, digital process control, and strategic supply management defines the next phase of curing adhesive evolution. Stakeholders that integrate these elements into coherent roadmaps will be better equipped to meet emerging performance demands while navigating systemic challenges.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction to curing adhesives highlighting technological evolution, performance priorities, supply chain dynamics, and cross‑industry relevance
Curing adhesives have become a central enabler of modern assembly and manufacturing. As material engineers and process leads seek reliable joining solutions that meet higher performance and sustainability thresholds, curing chemistries and application processes have evolved to satisfy a more exacting set of functional and regulatory requirements. This introduction synthesizes the role of curing adhesives across industries, framing their technical attributes, process considerations, and strategic importance for stakeholders who must balance performance, cost, and compliance.
Over recent years, the value proposition of curing adhesives has extended beyond bond strength to include service life under environmental stress, compatibility with advanced substrates, and integration with automation. These shifts have elevated the role of adhesives teams from incremental suppliers to strategic collaborators in product development, influencing material selection, assembly sequencing, and in-line quality assurance practices. At the same time, supply chain dynamics and raw material availability have introduced new constraints and choices for formulators and buyers.
Consequently, technology roadmaps for curing adhesives now prioritize cross-cutting objectives: achieving reliable cure in constrained process windows, reducing volatile organic compounds, enabling lower-temperature processing, and designing for end-of-life considerations. This introduction establishes the context for deeper analysis by outlining the key technical drivers and organizational implications that shape adoption and innovation across sectors.
Transformative forces reshaping the curing adhesives landscape through sustainability mandates, digital integration, novel chemistries, and agile production
The landscape for curing adhesives is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging forces in sustainability, digitalization, and materials science. Sustainability mandates are compelling formulators to reduce solvent dependence, increase use of low-emission chemistries, and explore recyclability-aware adhesive strategies. Concurrently, digital process integration-spanning sensor-enabled curing stations, predictive process controls, and digital twins-has enabled more consistent cure outcomes and shorter qualification cycles, altering how teams validate assemblies.
In parallel, advances in polymer chemistry and photoinitiators have expanded options for low-temperature or rapid-cure processes that align with sensitive substrates and high-throughput lines. These novel chemistries reduce thermal stress on components and enable new assembly architectures. Moreover, supply chain decentralization and localized manufacturing are prompting suppliers to rethink distribution and formulation flexibility to serve variable production footprints.
As a result of these forces, business models are shifting toward service-led propositions where technical support, co-development, and lifecycle management become differentiators. Regulatory complexity is accelerating product stewardship programs and compliance-driven innovation, creating a feedback loop between end users and adhesive developers. Together, these trends are redefining how curing adhesive solutions are specified, validated, and scaled across industrial and medical applications.
Cumulative impact of U.S. tariff measures on curing adhesive supply chains, raw material sourcing, cost structures, and strategic supplier reconfiguration
Recent U.S. tariff measures have introduced a sequence of operational and strategic responses across the curing adhesive ecosystem without altering the underlying technical requirements of formulations. At the most immediate level, tariffs influence the economics of raw material sourcing and the relative attractiveness of regional suppliers. In response, procurement teams are increasingly mapping supplier risk, diversifying source lists, and engaging in longer-term supply agreements to create predictable input streams. These responses are reshaping negotiation dynamics and supplier selection criteria.
Moreover, tariffs have amplified incentives for domestic production and local formulation adaptation. Chemical manufacturers and formulators evaluate re-shoring or near-shoring of key intermediate processes to mitigate tariff exposure and shorten lead times. This reconfiguration of supply chains is rarely immediate; it involves capital allocation, regulatory approvals, and workforce development, yet it alters long-term strategic planning and portfolio prioritization.
Finally, the cumulative policy environment influences product strategy and pricing discussions across value chains. Brands and OEMs re-evaluate total cost of ownership, specification flexibility, and alternative chemistries that rely on more readily available feedstocks. While tariffs do not change performance requirements, they do change the calculus around supplier partnerships, inventory strategies, and technical trade-offs. Consequently, organizations must consider policy-driven supply risk as part of technology roadmaps and procurement governance without assuming it will permanently substitute technical judgment.
Segmentation-driven insights into adhesive chemistries, curing technologies, form factors, end use verticals, and application routes to guide R&D and go-to-market
A rigorous segmentation lens clarifies where technical priorities and commercial strategies intersect across adhesive types, curing technologies, form factors, end use industries, and applications. When considering adhesive type, analysts observe distinct development paths for acrylics, cyanoacrylates, epoxies, silicones, and urethanes. Acrylics deserve attention for their division between solvent based and water based formulations, each addressing different regulatory and performance constraints. Cyanoacrylates are characterized by variations such as modified and standard grades, with modified versions engineered for enhanced impact or temperature resistance. Silicone technology is nuanced by cure chemistry, notably acid cure and neutral cure variants that influence substrate compatibility and odor or corrosion considerations.
Curing technology is another critical axis, encompassing anaerobic, heat, moisture, radiation, and UV processes. These modalities impose specific process controls and equipment footprints, and they determine which substrates and assembly environments are viable. Form factor plays an equally central role; adhesives delivered as film, liquid, paste, or powder create different material handling, dispensing, and storage requirements that affect line design and quality assurance.
End use industry segmentation spans aerospace, automotive, construction, electronics and electrical, medical devices, and packaging. Within electronics and electrical, further distinctions are useful between consumer electronics, industrial electronics, and telecommunications due to differing reliability and thermal management expectations. Finally, application segmentation-bonding, coating, encapsulating, laminating, and sealing-links directly to functional specification, testing protocols, and lifecycle performance criteria. Taken together, these segmentation axes provide a multi-dimensional framework for prioritizing product development and go-to-market decisions.
Regional dynamics across Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific focusing on supply resilience, regulatory divergence, innovation, and demand
Regional dynamics strongly influence where curing adhesive innovation, production, and adoption concentrate, each region presenting distinct regulatory, logistical, and commercial characteristics. In the Americas, supply chain resilience and proximity to automotive and aerospace hubs shape procurement choices and incentivize formulations that meet varied climatic and regulatory regimes. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency and a pronounced focus on sustainability elevate demand for low-emission chemistries, while regional industrial diversity fosters both specialized high-performance solutions and cost-sensitive products.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization, strong electronics manufacturing clusters, and significant capacity in chemical production create both demand and supply advantages. This region often leads in process innovation geared toward high-volume consumer electronics and telecommunications assemblies. Transitional dynamics are common: manufacturing footprints shift in response to labor cost pressures, trade policies, and regional investments in advanced manufacturing capabilities.
Taken together, these regional distinctions guide strategic decisions around inventory allocation, technical support networks, and local formulation variants. Companies that align product portfolios and service models with the operational realities and regulatory frameworks of each region gain advantages in rollout speed, customer trust, and long-term resilience.
Corporate insights into strategies of adhesive manufacturers and suppliers emphasizing portfolio evolution, partnerships, consolidation, and R&D priorities
Company-level strategies reflect an interplay between technological leadership and commercial execution. Market participants increasingly differentiate by integrating formulation expertise with application engineering, offering not just adhesive products but also process optimization services and qualification support. This combination positions suppliers to co-develop solutions with OEMs, accelerating adoption when technical alignment is achieved early in product lifecycles. Strategic moves such as portfolio rationalization, targeted acquisitions, and collaborations with equipment providers are visible as firms seek to offer end-to-end solution packages that reduce customer friction.
Investment in R&D remains a primary vector of competitive advantage, with emphasis on low-temperature cures, hybrid chemistries, and photoinitiator systems that expand substrate compatibility. Organizations are also deploying tiered product strategies that balance high-performance grades for mission-critical applications with cost-effective variants tailored for volume manufacturing. In parallel, improvements in application equipment, dispensing accuracy, and inline cure monitoring are becoming value propositions that complement chemical offerings.
Additionally, corporate responses to regulatory trends and supply chain uncertainty include greater transparency on raw material provenance, increased use of secondary sourcing strategies, and the development of region-specific formulations. These shifts underscore the importance of nimble commercialization, robust technical service, and proactive stakeholder engagement in sustaining competitive positioning.
Practical recommendations for industry leaders to adopt advanced curing solutions, fortify supply chains, embed sustainability, and accelerate strategic collaborations
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions that translate emerging trends into competitive advantage. First, align product development roadmaps with sustainability requirements and process constraints by accelerating the shift toward low-solvent or water-based systems where feasible, while preserving key performance attributes. Second, strengthen supply chain resilience by mapping critical intermediates, diversifying supplier relationships, and evaluating near-shore manufacturing or toll-processing arrangements to reduce geopolitical exposure.
Third, invest in digital process integration to achieve consistent cure outcomes; sensor-equipped cure stations, data analytics, and predictive maintenance reduce variability and shorten qualification cycles. Fourth, pursue partnerships across the value chain-co-development with OEMs, alliances with equipment vendors, and collaborations with material suppliers-to accelerate time-to-market for new chemistries and application systems. Fifth, build flexible go-to-market strategies that account for regional regulatory differences and customer service expectations, enabling localized formulation variants and technical support models.
Finally, embed rigorous product stewardship and regulatory monitoring into commercial processes to anticipate compliance risks and position innovations as solutions to policy-driven constraints. These recommendations are actionable and interdependent; successful implementation requires coordinated investment across R&D, procurement, and commercial teams.
Methodological framework combining expert interviews, laboratory validation, supply chain mapping, and qualitative synthesis to ensure analytical rigor, relevance
The research underpinning this analysis combines qualitative and technical approaches to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary engagements with industry experts, formulators, process engineers, and procurement leaders provided context on technology adoption, validation practices, and supplier selection criteria. Laboratory validation and technical reviews complemented these interviews, enabling the assessment of cure modalities, substrate compatibility, and handling constraints under controlled conditions.
Supply chain mapping and material flow analysis were used to trace vulnerability points and to identify strategic sourcing alternatives without relying on numerical estimations. Secondary sources and peer-reviewed literature informed the understanding of regulatory trends and material science advances, while anonymized case studies illustrated practical deployment challenges and mitigation tactics. Throughout, findings were synthesized with attention to cross-sectoral applicability and operational feasibility.
Quality controls included triangulation of findings across multiple expert inputs and verification of technical claims against laboratory evidence. The resulting methodology ensures that conclusions are grounded in observed practice, validated chemistry, and strategic considerations relevant to decision-makers across manufacturing and procurement functions.
Synthesis of curing adhesive landscape underscoring key strategic takeaways from technology trends, regulatory change, segmentation nuances, and regional dynamics
This analysis synthesizes the technical, commercial, and regional forces shaping the curing adhesives landscape and distills practical implications for stakeholders. Technological innovations are expanding the palette of cure mechanisms and formulations, enabling greater compatibility with modern substrates and low-energy process windows. At the same time, regulatory and supply chain pressures are incentivizing new approaches to formulation, sourcing, and product stewardship.
Segmentation analysis clarifies which combinations of chemistry, curing technology, form factor, and application are most relevant to particular industries, supporting more precise R&D prioritization and commercialization planning. Regional dynamics underline the importance of tailoring supply models and technical support to local regulatory regimes and manufacturing ecosystems. Company strategies that couple chemical innovation with service-led offerings and operational flexibility are better positioned to capture value across evolving end markets.
In short, the convergence of chemistry innovation, digital process control, and strategic supply management defines the next phase of curing adhesive evolution. Stakeholders that integrate these elements into coherent roadmaps will be better equipped to meet emerging performance demands while navigating systemic challenges.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
195 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Development of low-temperature UV-curable adhesives for heat-sensitive electronics assembly
- 5.2. Increasing demand for bio-based curing adhesives derived from renewable feedstocks
- 5.3. Integration of real-time monitoring sensors in curing adhesive processes for quality control
- 5.4. Advancements in dual-curing adhesives combining UV and epoxy mechanisms for complex assemblies
- 5.5. Rise of solvent-free and low-VOC curing adhesives to meet tightening environmental regulations
- 5.6. Adoption of LED-based UV curing systems to reduce energy consumption and extend lamp life in manufacturing lines
- 5.7. Emergence of conductive adhesives with curing profiles optimized for flexible printed electronics
- 5.8. Development of ultra-fast curing adhesives enabling high-speed production in packaging and labeling industries
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Curing Adhesives Market, by Adhesive Type
- 8.1. Acrylic
- 8.1.1. Solvent Based
- 8.1.2. Water Based
- 8.2. Cyanoacrylate
- 8.2.1. Modified
- 8.2.2. Standard
- 8.3. Epoxy
- 8.4. Silicone
- 8.4.1. Acid Cure
- 8.4.2. Neutral Cure
- 8.5. Urethane
- 9. Curing Adhesives Market, by Curing Technology
- 9.1. Anaerobic
- 9.2. Heat
- 9.3. Moisture
- 9.4. Radiation
- 9.5. UV
- 10. Curing Adhesives Market, by Form Factor
- 10.1. Film
- 10.2. Liquid
- 10.3. Paste
- 10.4. Powder
- 11. Curing Adhesives Market, by End Use Industry
- 11.1. Aerospace
- 11.2. Automotive
- 11.3. Construction
- 11.4. Electronics & Electrical
- 11.4.1. Consumer Electronics
- 11.4.2. Industrial Electronics
- 11.4.3. Telecommunications
- 11.5. Medical Devices
- 11.6. Packaging
- 12. Curing Adhesives Market, by Application
- 12.1. Bonding
- 12.2. Coating
- 12.3. Encapsulating
- 12.4. Laminating
- 12.5. Sealing
- 13. Curing Adhesives Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Curing Adhesives Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Curing Adhesives Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. 3M Company
- 16.3.2. Adhesives Research, Inc.
- 16.3.3. Avery Dennison Corporation
- 16.3.4. Bostik SA by Arkema Group
- 16.3.5. Cartell Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.6. Chase Corporation
- 16.3.7. DELO Industrie Klebstoffe GmbH & Co. KGaA
- 16.3.8. Dexerials Corporation
- 16.3.9. Dow Inc.
- 16.3.10. Dymax Corporation
- 16.3.11. Epoxy Technology Inc.
- 16.3.12. H.B. Fuller Company
- 16.3.13. Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
- 16.3.14. Hernon Manufacturing, Inc.
- 16.3.15. ITW
- 16.3.16. Master Bond Inc.
- 16.3.17. Nitto Denko Corporation
- 16.3.18. Norland Products Inc.
- 16.3.19. Novachem Corporation Ltd.
- 16.3.20. Panacol-Elosol GmbH
- 16.3.21. Parker Hannifin Corporation
- 16.3.22. Parson Adhesives, Inc.
- 16.3.23. Permabond LLC
- 16.3.24. SEKISUI CHEMICAL CO.,LTD
- 16.3.25. Thorlabs
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
