Cumene Market by Production Method (Zeolite Cumene, Solid Phosphoric Acid Cumene, Aluminum Chloride Cumene), Form (Solid, Liquid), Grade, Application, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Cumene Market was valued at USD 21.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 22.40 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.36%, reaching USD 34.55 billion by 2032.
An authoritative overview of cumene fundamentals linking feedstock dependencies, downstream applications, and operational priorities shaping producer strategies
Cumene, an aromatic hydrocarbon commonly produced by the alkylation of benzene with propylene, occupies a foundational position in many chemical value chains owing to its role as the primary feedstock for phenol and acetone production. The upstream relationships between benzene availability, propylene streams from refining and steam crackers, and the economics of alkylation units exert continuous pressure on operational decisions at production sites. Downstream, phenol and acetone serve diverse industrial functions, linking cumene dynamics to end uses such as resins, coatings, solvents, and pharmaceutical intermediates. Consequently, shifts in feedstock sourcing, process configurations, and end-use demand resonate throughout the chain.
Operational priorities for producers increasingly emphasize flexibility, environmental compliance, and product quality differentiation. Investment in catalytic performance, energy efficiency, and on-purpose production routes reflects an industry response to feedstock volatility and evolving regulatory expectations. At the same time, downstream buyers are raising specifications for higher-purity grades, shorter lead times, and sustainability credentials, prompting producers to reconsider asset utilization and portfolio strategies. This introduction sets the stage for an analyst’s lens on how raw material linkages, technology, and end-use demand collectively shape strategic choices and competitive positioning across the cumene ecosystem.
A detailed analysis of the pivotal structural and technological shifts reshaping cumene supply chains, production practices, and downstream demand dynamics
Over recent years the cumene landscape has experienced transformative shifts driven by both structural and tactical factors that are redefining how stakeholders create and capture value. Volatility in propylene and benzene streams, partly due to refinery turnarounds and shifting naphtha cracker configurations, has heightened the premium on feedstock flexibility and access. Simultaneously, the acceleration of sustainability objectives across value chains has prompted investment in lower-emission process routes and greater scrutiny of cradle-to-gate carbon intensity, altering capital allocation and product positioning.
Technological advances in catalysis and process intensification have improved selectivity and energy profiles for alkylation units, enabling producers to extract more value from existing assets. Digitalization initiatives are increasingly applied to maintenance and process optimization, reducing downtime and improving yield stability. On the demand side, evolving end-use requirements for phenol and acetone-driven by innovations in resins, high-performance coatings, and pharmaceutical intermediates-are prompting differentiated supply arrangements and long-term offtake agreements. Regulatory tightening around emissions and chemical stewardship is further catalyzing a shift toward traceability and supplier transparency, creating new commercial dynamics between raw material suppliers, producers, and downstream manufacturers.
An in-depth review of how 2025 tariff actions have reshaped imports, sourcing decisions, capacity planning, and commercial risk management across the cumene value chain
The cumulative effects of tariff actions introduced in 2025 have materially changed trade flows and commercial calculus across the cumene value chain, prompting a reassessment of sourcing strategies and contractual arrangements. Tariff burdens increased landed costs for certain imported feedstocks and finished intermediates, which encouraged buyers to seek alternative sourcing, renegotiate long-term supply contracts, and lean more heavily on regional suppliers. In several instances this trade-policy environment accelerated nearshoring trends, as firms prioritized continuity of supply and reduced exposure to transpacific and interregional transit risks.
Beyond immediate cost implications, tariffs have influenced investment decisions and capacity planning. Producers and integrated chemical firms re-evaluated the economics of expanding local alkylation capacity versus relying on imported intermediates. Trade policy complexity also raised administrative compliance burdens and lengthened procurement lead times, incentivizing larger safety stocks and more robust logistics planning. For downstream manufacturers, the tariffs amplified pressure to optimize feedstock utilization and to engage in collaborative approaches with suppliers to mitigate cost transmission. Over time, these shifts have fostered greater regional self-reliance, diversified supplier networks, and a more proactive approach to policy risk assessment across the cumene ecosystem.
Critical segmentation insights that illuminate how grade differentiation, application routes, and diverse end-use industries drive production choices and commercial positioning
Segment-level dynamics reveal divergent pressures and opportunities across grade, application, and end-use dimensions that inform product strategy and operational design. Based on Grade, market is studied across High Purity Grade and Standard Grade; this bifurcation reflects differing downstream tolerances for impurities and variable margin potential. High purity product lines demand tighter process controls and enhanced quality assurance protocols but command strategic positioning with specialty downstream users, while standard grades support broad-volume industrial applications where cost and availability are primary considerations.
Based on Application, market is studied across Acetone and Phenol; the relative health of these two derivative streams strongly influences producer allocation decisions and product routing. Acetone demand is sensitive to solvent and coating cycles, whereas phenol underpins resin technologies and numerous industrial intermediates. Based on End Use Industry, market is studied across Chemical Manufacturing, Coatings, Pharmaceutical, and Plastics & Resins; each of these end-use segments presents distinct requirements for supply continuity, regulatory compliance, and quality specification. Chemical manufacturing and plastics & resins sectors typically emphasize throughput and cost efficiency, coatings demand tighter specification control and sustainability attributes, and the pharmaceutical sector imposes the most rigorous purity and traceability standards, prompting tailored production and logistics approaches.
A region-by-region appraisal of feedstock availability, regulatory differences, and downstream demand patterns shaping cumene supply chains across global markets
Regional dynamics in the cumene ecosystem reflect differences in feedstock endowments, regulatory environments, and downstream industrial composition that shape strategic priorities for both producers and buyers. In the Americas, proximity to feedstock sources from refinery and petrochemical streams, a mature downstream chemicals sector, and growing interest in nearshoring have created an environment where logistical agility and local integration are highly valued. Producers in this region have concentrated on optimizing existing assets and improving supply-chain resilience to serve key resin and coatings markets.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a heterogeneous landscape in which regulatory rigor, emissions targets, and diverse feedstock access produce differentiated regional strategies. In Western Europe, strict environmental standards and strong demand for specialty grades encourage investments in cleaner processes and higher-purity offerings. The Middle East benefits from advantaged hydrocarbon feedstocks that support cost-competitive production, while Africa presents both emerging demand and logistical challenges that require tailored commercial approaches. Asia-Pacific remains the largest hub for downstream consumption and production complexity, driven by expansive polymer manufacturing, a dense coatings industry, and rapidly evolving pharmaceutical capabilities. The region’s emphasis on scale, cost optimization, and incremental technology adoption has significant implications for global trade flows and competitive dynamics.
Strategic and operational company-level practices that reveal how producers use integration, specialization, and technology to navigate volatility and differentiate offerings
Leading firms and integrated chemical players are adopting a combination of strategic levers to maintain competitiveness and manage risk across the cumene value chain. Many are pursuing vertical integration strategies that link feedstock supply to downstream phenol and acetone production, thereby smoothing input volatility and capturing more value across the chain. Others prioritize portfolio differentiation by investing in high-purity production lines, specialty-grade offerings, and enhanced quality systems to serve the most demanding downstream customers.
Partnerships, joint ventures, and offtake arrangements have become common tools to secure reliable propylene and benzene streams and to underpin investment in capacity upgrades. Technology investments, including advanced catalysts, process analytics, and energy-efficiency projects, are widely used to improve yields and reduce operating intensity. At the same time, firms are expanding sustainability programs-focusing on emissions reduction, process water management, and transparent supply-chain disclosures-to meet customer expectations and regulatory requirements. Operational excellence initiatives aimed at reliability, safety, and compliance continue to be foundational priorities, with several companies leveraging digital operations and condition-based maintenance to reduce downtime and optimize asset utilization.
High-impact recommendations for executives to strengthen supply resilience, diversify product capability, and align commercial strategy with regulatory and sustainability priorities
Industry leaders should pursue a set of practical, prioritized actions to strengthen resilience, unlock margin opportunities, and align with evolving downstream requirements. First, diversify feedstock sourcing and establish flexible procurement frameworks that blend long-term contracts with spot and regional suppliers, thereby reducing exposure to single-point disruptions while retaining negotiating leverage. Second, invest selectively in capacity and process improvements that enable production of both high-purity and standard grades, creating the capability to shift output in response to changing end-use demand and specification requirements.
Third, build closer commercial partnerships with downstream customers through collaborative demand planning, joint quality improvement programs, and shared sustainability initiatives to secure stable offtake and justify premium product positioning. Fourth, implement comprehensive tariff and policy scenario planning to assess the implications of trade measures on sourcing, pricing, and logistics, and develop responsive contingency plans. Fifth, accelerate digital adoption across operations and supply-chain functions to improve forecasting accuracy, reduce maintenance-related downtime, and optimize inventory profiles. Finally, embed sustainability into capital allocation decisions by prioritizing emissions-reduction projects, lifecycle transparency, and circular-economy initiatives that enhance reputational value and meet emerging regulatory expectations.
A transparent explanation of the mixed-methods research approach that combines primary stakeholder interviews with rigorous secondary validation and data triangulation
The research approach combined structured primary engagement with secondary evidence synthesis to ensure balanced, verifiable conclusions. Primary research comprised targeted interviews with producers, downstream manufacturers, procurement leaders, and subject matter experts across the value chain to capture first-hand perspectives on operational challenges, quality requirements, and commercial strategies. These conversations informed hypothesis development and provided qualitative context for observed trends. Secondary research drew on company public disclosures, industry journals, trade publications, and regulatory filings to corroborate primary inputs and to surface historical and policy-related drivers.
Data triangulation was applied throughout, matching interview insights with documented practices and available operational data to validate key findings and to identify areas of divergence. The methodology emphasized transparency on data provenance, and sensitivity checks were conducted for assertions that depended on evolving policy or commodity dynamics. Limitations included variability in disclosure practices across firms and the time-lag inherent to certain public filings; where appropriate, caveats are provided and qualitative confidence levels are stated for key observations. Quality controls included peer review by technical analysts and cross-functional validation to ensure the research yields actionable, defensible insights.
A concise summation of strategic imperatives showing how operational flexibility, technological investment, and stakeholder alignment create sustained advantage in the cumene ecosystem
In synthesis, the cumene value chain stands at the intersection of feedstock volatility, technological evolution, regulatory pressure, and shifting end-use requirements, creating both risks and avenues for strategic advantage. Producers that prioritize feedstock flexibility, invest in selective capacity and purity differentiation, and deepen commercial alignment with downstream partners will be better positioned to navigate policy shifts and demand-side changes. At the same time, tariffs and trade policy adjustments have introduced a new layer of complexity to sourcing decisions, prompting heightened attention to regional supply resilience and logistics optimization.
Looking forward, successful stakeholders will combine operational discipline with adaptive strategy: leveraging process innovations to improve yield and environmental performance, expanding product portfolios to meet diverse specification needs, and deploying digital and procurement capabilities to reduce volatility exposure. By integrating these elements into capital planning and commercial engagement, firms can convert uncertainty into opportunity and strengthen their competitive stance across multiple downstream value chains.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative overview of cumene fundamentals linking feedstock dependencies, downstream applications, and operational priorities shaping producer strategies
Cumene, an aromatic hydrocarbon commonly produced by the alkylation of benzene with propylene, occupies a foundational position in many chemical value chains owing to its role as the primary feedstock for phenol and acetone production. The upstream relationships between benzene availability, propylene streams from refining and steam crackers, and the economics of alkylation units exert continuous pressure on operational decisions at production sites. Downstream, phenol and acetone serve diverse industrial functions, linking cumene dynamics to end uses such as resins, coatings, solvents, and pharmaceutical intermediates. Consequently, shifts in feedstock sourcing, process configurations, and end-use demand resonate throughout the chain.
Operational priorities for producers increasingly emphasize flexibility, environmental compliance, and product quality differentiation. Investment in catalytic performance, energy efficiency, and on-purpose production routes reflects an industry response to feedstock volatility and evolving regulatory expectations. At the same time, downstream buyers are raising specifications for higher-purity grades, shorter lead times, and sustainability credentials, prompting producers to reconsider asset utilization and portfolio strategies. This introduction sets the stage for an analyst’s lens on how raw material linkages, technology, and end-use demand collectively shape strategic choices and competitive positioning across the cumene ecosystem.
A detailed analysis of the pivotal structural and technological shifts reshaping cumene supply chains, production practices, and downstream demand dynamics
Over recent years the cumene landscape has experienced transformative shifts driven by both structural and tactical factors that are redefining how stakeholders create and capture value. Volatility in propylene and benzene streams, partly due to refinery turnarounds and shifting naphtha cracker configurations, has heightened the premium on feedstock flexibility and access. Simultaneously, the acceleration of sustainability objectives across value chains has prompted investment in lower-emission process routes and greater scrutiny of cradle-to-gate carbon intensity, altering capital allocation and product positioning.
Technological advances in catalysis and process intensification have improved selectivity and energy profiles for alkylation units, enabling producers to extract more value from existing assets. Digitalization initiatives are increasingly applied to maintenance and process optimization, reducing downtime and improving yield stability. On the demand side, evolving end-use requirements for phenol and acetone-driven by innovations in resins, high-performance coatings, and pharmaceutical intermediates-are prompting differentiated supply arrangements and long-term offtake agreements. Regulatory tightening around emissions and chemical stewardship is further catalyzing a shift toward traceability and supplier transparency, creating new commercial dynamics between raw material suppliers, producers, and downstream manufacturers.
An in-depth review of how 2025 tariff actions have reshaped imports, sourcing decisions, capacity planning, and commercial risk management across the cumene value chain
The cumulative effects of tariff actions introduced in 2025 have materially changed trade flows and commercial calculus across the cumene value chain, prompting a reassessment of sourcing strategies and contractual arrangements. Tariff burdens increased landed costs for certain imported feedstocks and finished intermediates, which encouraged buyers to seek alternative sourcing, renegotiate long-term supply contracts, and lean more heavily on regional suppliers. In several instances this trade-policy environment accelerated nearshoring trends, as firms prioritized continuity of supply and reduced exposure to transpacific and interregional transit risks.
Beyond immediate cost implications, tariffs have influenced investment decisions and capacity planning. Producers and integrated chemical firms re-evaluated the economics of expanding local alkylation capacity versus relying on imported intermediates. Trade policy complexity also raised administrative compliance burdens and lengthened procurement lead times, incentivizing larger safety stocks and more robust logistics planning. For downstream manufacturers, the tariffs amplified pressure to optimize feedstock utilization and to engage in collaborative approaches with suppliers to mitigate cost transmission. Over time, these shifts have fostered greater regional self-reliance, diversified supplier networks, and a more proactive approach to policy risk assessment across the cumene ecosystem.
Critical segmentation insights that illuminate how grade differentiation, application routes, and diverse end-use industries drive production choices and commercial positioning
Segment-level dynamics reveal divergent pressures and opportunities across grade, application, and end-use dimensions that inform product strategy and operational design. Based on Grade, market is studied across High Purity Grade and Standard Grade; this bifurcation reflects differing downstream tolerances for impurities and variable margin potential. High purity product lines demand tighter process controls and enhanced quality assurance protocols but command strategic positioning with specialty downstream users, while standard grades support broad-volume industrial applications where cost and availability are primary considerations.
Based on Application, market is studied across Acetone and Phenol; the relative health of these two derivative streams strongly influences producer allocation decisions and product routing. Acetone demand is sensitive to solvent and coating cycles, whereas phenol underpins resin technologies and numerous industrial intermediates. Based on End Use Industry, market is studied across Chemical Manufacturing, Coatings, Pharmaceutical, and Plastics & Resins; each of these end-use segments presents distinct requirements for supply continuity, regulatory compliance, and quality specification. Chemical manufacturing and plastics & resins sectors typically emphasize throughput and cost efficiency, coatings demand tighter specification control and sustainability attributes, and the pharmaceutical sector imposes the most rigorous purity and traceability standards, prompting tailored production and logistics approaches.
A region-by-region appraisal of feedstock availability, regulatory differences, and downstream demand patterns shaping cumene supply chains across global markets
Regional dynamics in the cumene ecosystem reflect differences in feedstock endowments, regulatory environments, and downstream industrial composition that shape strategic priorities for both producers and buyers. In the Americas, proximity to feedstock sources from refinery and petrochemical streams, a mature downstream chemicals sector, and growing interest in nearshoring have created an environment where logistical agility and local integration are highly valued. Producers in this region have concentrated on optimizing existing assets and improving supply-chain resilience to serve key resin and coatings markets.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a heterogeneous landscape in which regulatory rigor, emissions targets, and diverse feedstock access produce differentiated regional strategies. In Western Europe, strict environmental standards and strong demand for specialty grades encourage investments in cleaner processes and higher-purity offerings. The Middle East benefits from advantaged hydrocarbon feedstocks that support cost-competitive production, while Africa presents both emerging demand and logistical challenges that require tailored commercial approaches. Asia-Pacific remains the largest hub for downstream consumption and production complexity, driven by expansive polymer manufacturing, a dense coatings industry, and rapidly evolving pharmaceutical capabilities. The region’s emphasis on scale, cost optimization, and incremental technology adoption has significant implications for global trade flows and competitive dynamics.
Strategic and operational company-level practices that reveal how producers use integration, specialization, and technology to navigate volatility and differentiate offerings
Leading firms and integrated chemical players are adopting a combination of strategic levers to maintain competitiveness and manage risk across the cumene value chain. Many are pursuing vertical integration strategies that link feedstock supply to downstream phenol and acetone production, thereby smoothing input volatility and capturing more value across the chain. Others prioritize portfolio differentiation by investing in high-purity production lines, specialty-grade offerings, and enhanced quality systems to serve the most demanding downstream customers.
Partnerships, joint ventures, and offtake arrangements have become common tools to secure reliable propylene and benzene streams and to underpin investment in capacity upgrades. Technology investments, including advanced catalysts, process analytics, and energy-efficiency projects, are widely used to improve yields and reduce operating intensity. At the same time, firms are expanding sustainability programs-focusing on emissions reduction, process water management, and transparent supply-chain disclosures-to meet customer expectations and regulatory requirements. Operational excellence initiatives aimed at reliability, safety, and compliance continue to be foundational priorities, with several companies leveraging digital operations and condition-based maintenance to reduce downtime and optimize asset utilization.
High-impact recommendations for executives to strengthen supply resilience, diversify product capability, and align commercial strategy with regulatory and sustainability priorities
Industry leaders should pursue a set of practical, prioritized actions to strengthen resilience, unlock margin opportunities, and align with evolving downstream requirements. First, diversify feedstock sourcing and establish flexible procurement frameworks that blend long-term contracts with spot and regional suppliers, thereby reducing exposure to single-point disruptions while retaining negotiating leverage. Second, invest selectively in capacity and process improvements that enable production of both high-purity and standard grades, creating the capability to shift output in response to changing end-use demand and specification requirements.
Third, build closer commercial partnerships with downstream customers through collaborative demand planning, joint quality improvement programs, and shared sustainability initiatives to secure stable offtake and justify premium product positioning. Fourth, implement comprehensive tariff and policy scenario planning to assess the implications of trade measures on sourcing, pricing, and logistics, and develop responsive contingency plans. Fifth, accelerate digital adoption across operations and supply-chain functions to improve forecasting accuracy, reduce maintenance-related downtime, and optimize inventory profiles. Finally, embed sustainability into capital allocation decisions by prioritizing emissions-reduction projects, lifecycle transparency, and circular-economy initiatives that enhance reputational value and meet emerging regulatory expectations.
A transparent explanation of the mixed-methods research approach that combines primary stakeholder interviews with rigorous secondary validation and data triangulation
The research approach combined structured primary engagement with secondary evidence synthesis to ensure balanced, verifiable conclusions. Primary research comprised targeted interviews with producers, downstream manufacturers, procurement leaders, and subject matter experts across the value chain to capture first-hand perspectives on operational challenges, quality requirements, and commercial strategies. These conversations informed hypothesis development and provided qualitative context for observed trends. Secondary research drew on company public disclosures, industry journals, trade publications, and regulatory filings to corroborate primary inputs and to surface historical and policy-related drivers.
Data triangulation was applied throughout, matching interview insights with documented practices and available operational data to validate key findings and to identify areas of divergence. The methodology emphasized transparency on data provenance, and sensitivity checks were conducted for assertions that depended on evolving policy or commodity dynamics. Limitations included variability in disclosure practices across firms and the time-lag inherent to certain public filings; where appropriate, caveats are provided and qualitative confidence levels are stated for key observations. Quality controls included peer review by technical analysts and cross-functional validation to ensure the research yields actionable, defensible insights.
A concise summation of strategic imperatives showing how operational flexibility, technological investment, and stakeholder alignment create sustained advantage in the cumene ecosystem
In synthesis, the cumene value chain stands at the intersection of feedstock volatility, technological evolution, regulatory pressure, and shifting end-use requirements, creating both risks and avenues for strategic advantage. Producers that prioritize feedstock flexibility, invest in selective capacity and purity differentiation, and deepen commercial alignment with downstream partners will be better positioned to navigate policy shifts and demand-side changes. At the same time, tariffs and trade policy adjustments have introduced a new layer of complexity to sourcing decisions, prompting heightened attention to regional supply resilience and logistics optimization.
Looking forward, successful stakeholders will combine operational discipline with adaptive strategy: leveraging process innovations to improve yield and environmental performance, expanding product portfolios to meet diverse specification needs, and deploying digital and procurement capabilities to reduce volatility exposure. By integrating these elements into capital planning and commercial engagement, firms can convert uncertainty into opportunity and strengthen their competitive stance across multiple downstream value chains.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising crude oil price volatility driving feedstock cost fluctuations in global cumene market
- 5.2. Expansion of integrated petrochemical complexes boosting cumene production capacity in Asia Pacific
- 5.3. Stringent environmental regulations on benzene emissions reshaping cumene manufacturing practices
- 5.4. Growing demand for phenolic resins in automotive and construction driving cumene derivative consumption
- 5.5. Shift towards shale gas derived benzene feedstock optimizing cost structures in North American cumene plants
- 5.6. Innovations in acid catalyst technology enhancing selectivity and yield in cumene alkylation processes
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Cumene Market, by Production Method
- 8.1. Zeolite Cumene
- 8.2. Solid Phosphoric Acid Cumene
- 8.3. Aluminum Chloride Cumene
- 9. Cumene Market, by Form
- 9.1. Solid
- 9.2. Liquid
- 10. Cumene Market, by Grade
- 10.1. High Purity Grade
- 10.2. Standard Grade
- 11. Cumene Market, by Application
- 11.1. Acetone
- 11.2. Phenol
- 11.3. Synthetic Detergents
- 12. Cumene Market, by End Use Industry
- 12.1. Chemical Manufacturing
- 12.2. Coatings
- 12.3. Pharmaceutical
- 12.4. Plastics & Resins
- 13. Cumene Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Cumene Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Cumene Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. BASF SE
- 16.3.2. Braskem SA
- 16.3.3. Cepsa Química, SA
- 16.3.4. Chang Chun Group
- 16.3.5. China Petrochemical Development Corporation
- 16.3.6. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
- 16.3.7. DOMO Chemicals GmbH
- 16.3.8. Exxon Mobil Corporation
- 16.3.9. Formosa Plastics Corporation
- 16.3.10. INEOS AG
- 16.3.11. Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.
- 16.3.12. Kishida Chemical Co.,Ltd.
- 16.3.13. Koch Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.14. Kumho P&B Chemicals.,Inc.
- 16.3.15. Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
- 16.3.16. Prasol Chemicals Limited
- 16.3.17. Royal Dutch Shell PLC
- 16.3.18. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 16.3.19. Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp.
- 16.3.20. Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd.
- 16.3.21. Taiwan Cement Corp.
- 16.3.22. The Dow Chemical Company
- 16.3.23. Toronto Research Chemicals
- 16.3.24. Versalis S.p.A. by Eni S.p.A.
- 16.3.25. Westlake Chemical Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
