Crowdsourced Security Market by Security Testing Type (Bug Bounty Programs, Code Review, Mobile Application Pentesting), Deployment Model (Cloud, On Premises), Organization Size, Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Crowdsourced Security Market was valued at USD 218.58 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 242.53 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 11.14%, reaching USD 508.94 million by 2032.
Framing the strategic necessity of crowdsourced testing as a core component of resilient digital risk management for executive decision-makers
The executive introduction establishes the imperative for modern organizations to integrate crowdsourced security into their broader risk management strategies, emphasizing the dual objectives of rapid vulnerability discovery and continuous assurance. Crowdsourced programs are now a strategic lever, not merely a tactical supplement, enabling security teams to extend testing capacity, surface high-impact findings earlier in the software lifecycle, and benchmark program maturity against evolving threat dynamics.
Across industries, security leaders are balancing the need to accelerate digital transformation while maintaining robust control frameworks. As a result, programs that combine bug bounty initiatives, structured code review, red teaming, and continuous vulnerability assessment are gaining prominence. These hybrid approaches foster collaboration between internal teams and vetted external researchers, amplifying coverage across web, mobile, and infrastructure attack surfaces.
Transitioning from siloed seasonal testing to an always-on crowdsourced model requires leadership commitment, tailored incentives, and integration with secure development and incident response workflows. This introduction therefore frames the narrative for decision-makers who must prioritize investments that enhance detection velocity, reduce mean time to remediation, and align with compliance and procurement expectations.
How automation, regulatory shifts, and evolving researcher specialization are forcing program redesigns and governance modernization across organizations
The landscape of crowdsourced security is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological innovation, regulatory evolution, and changing attacker economics. Emerging automation and orchestration tools are enabling program managers to triage and validate submissions faster, while integrations with developer pipelines are converting vulnerability intelligence into prioritized remediation tasks. These changes are altering the relationship between external researchers and internal engineering teams, pushing organizations to formalize program governance and escalation pathways.
Simultaneously, regulatory focus on software security and critical infrastructure is prompting more rigorous program documentation and evidence-driven assurance. This regulatory pressure, paired with rising litigation and contractual security expectations, is increasing demand for demonstrable testing breadth and repeatable processes. In turn, service providers and internal security teams are adapting delivery models that emphasize transparent scopes, standardized vulnerability taxonomies, and measurable remediation SLAs.
Moreover, the skill distribution of external researcher communities is maturing; specialized expertise in mobile application pentesting, cloud configuration assessment, and advanced red teaming is more accessible, prompting organizations to refine scopes and reward structures to attract high-quality contributions. As a result, leaders must reassess program design to capture these capabilities while maintaining control over exposure and compliance risks.
Understanding how 2025 United States tariff adjustments reshape procurement, vendor selection, and deployment strategies for crowdsourced security programs
The cumulative policy shifts affecting cross-border trade and supply chains have a material influence on the operational calculus of crowdsourced security programs, particularly through the lens of tariff changes enacted by the United States in 2025. These trade measures have altered procurement cost structures for hardware, third-party testing platforms, and managed services, prompting security leaders to reassess vendor selection and deployment strategies. In response, some organizations are optimizing for local sourcing or renegotiating service terms to offset increased import costs.
Consequently, program owners are recalibrating budgets and prioritizing investments that yield higher assurance per dollar spent. This is accelerating the adoption of cloud-based testing platforms, which can reduce dependence on imported physical tools and enable on-demand scaling of researcher participation. At the same time, tariffs have encouraged some enterprises to localize portions of their security operations or select vendors with regional delivery models to minimize exposure to cross-border cost volatility.
Transitioning through these dynamics requires careful contract management, an emphasis on total cost of ownership, and closer collaboration between security, procurement, and legal functions. Organizations that proactively map tariff impacts to program design options can maintain momentum in vulnerability discovery while preserving fiscal discipline and supply chain resilience.
A comprehensive segmentation-driven perspective showing how testing type, deployment model, organization scale, and vertical nuances determine program design and outcomes
A nuanced segmentation framework illuminates where program design choices and outcomes diverge across testing modalities, deployment preferences, organizational scale, and industry-specific risk profiles. Based on Security Testing Type, practitioners are balancing programs that include Bug Bounty Programs, Code Review, Mobile Application Pentesting, Network Infrastructure Pentesting, Penetration Testing, Red Teaming, Security Audits, Threat Hunting, Vulnerability Assessment, and Web Application Pentesting to achieve complementary coverage and expertise. Programs that combine continuous external discovery with targeted red team engagements and structured code review tend to identify systemic weaknesses earlier and support developer remediation workflows more effectively.
Based on Deployment Model, organizations must weigh Cloud and On Premises options, with cloud choices further subdivided into Private Cloud and Public Cloud approaches; public cloud deployment offers scalability and reduced capital exposure, whereas private cloud or on-premises setups provide tighter control for regulated environments. Based on Organization Size, the program architecture varies markedly between Large Enterprises and Small And Medium Enterprises, with Small And Medium Enterprises further categorized into Medium Enterprises and Small Enterprises; larger organizations often require multi-tiered governance and vendor management, while smaller entities benefit from curated, platform-led experiences that reduce administrative overhead.
Based on Industry Vertical, the program requirements reflect distinct regulatory and operational imperatives across Banking Financial Services And Insurance, Government Public Sector, Healthcare, IT And Telecommunications, and Retail E Commerce. Banking Financial Services And Insurance subdivides into Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance, each demanding high assurance and auditability. Government Public Sector splits into Federal Government and State And Local Government, where procurement rules and transparency obligations shape program scope. Healthcare’s subsegments of Hospitals, Medical Devices, and Pharmaceuticals impose patient-safety considerations and data privacy constraints. IT And Telecommunications’ IT Services And Consulting and Telecom Operators require resilience at scale, and Retail E Commerce’s Brick And Mortar Retail and E Commerce channels emphasize customer-facing application security and transaction integrity. By aligning program modalities to these segmentation axes, leaders can design testing regimens that are proportionate to both risk and operational realities.
How regional legal frameworks, talent availability, and cloud adoption patterns across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape program execution and governance
Regional dynamics materially influence the adoption, governance, and operational execution of crowdsourced security initiatives. In the Americas, mature commercial ecosystems and a dense vendor landscape support a wide range of program models from public-facing bug bounties to enterprise-grade managed services, while legal and procurement frameworks vary significantly between jurisdictions, shaping contractual safeguards and researcher disclosure policies. Transitioning across national boundaries within this region often requires harmonizing program rules with local data protection and export control considerations.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization efforts and heightened privacy regimes drive demand for privacy-preserving testing approaches and more stringent researcher vetting. Market maturity varies across subregions, with leading European markets emphasizing formal assurance frameworks and continental regulatory alignment, whereas some Middle Eastern and African markets are rapidly adopting cloud-enabled platforms to accelerate capability building. Consequently, program architects need to balance global consistency with local compliance and talent availability.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid digital adoption and a diverse threat landscape motivate aggressive uptake of crowdsourced testing, particularly across mobile and e-commerce use cases. The region’s mix of established and emerging markets encourages hybrid deployment strategies that align public cloud scalability with localized delivery models. As a result, organizations operating across these regions must design interoperable policies that respect regional legal regimes while enabling coordinated vulnerability management efforts.
Insights into how platform innovation, managed orchestration, and community governance are differentiating vendors and reshaping enterprise buying criteria
Key company insights focus on how vendors, platform providers, and service integrators are evolving to meet enterprise requirements for scale, compliance, and measurable remediation outcomes. Leading platforms are investing in automation to accelerate triage and integrate seamlessly with developer toolchains, while managed service partners are differentiating through verticalized expertise and evidence-based reporting that aligns to regulatory and audit needs. Strategic partnerships between platform providers and specialized testing firms enable deeper coverage across mobile, web, and infrastructure attack surfaces without imposing excessive vendor management burdens on customers.
Additionally, some companies are developing managed vulnerability orchestration capabilities that convert crowdsourced findings into prioritized remediation backlogs and verified fixes. This shift reduces the operational lift for internal security teams and helps ensure that high-severity findings translate into measurable risk reduction. Market leaders are also formalizing researcher communities with clear onboarding, code of conduct frameworks, and structured incentives to cultivate high-quality contributions and improve signal-to-noise ratios.
For procurement and legal teams, vendor selection increasingly hinges on the ability to demonstrate robust data handling, SLAs for validation, and transparent pricing models. Companies that can articulate a defensible governance model, strong remediation support, and alignment with industry-specific compliance expectations are best positioned to win enterprise-level engagements.
Practical governance, platform selection, and integration strategies to convert crowdsourced vulnerability findings into prioritized remediation and lasting risk reduction
Actionable recommendations for leaders focus on pragmatic steps to strengthen program outcomes while containing risk and cost. Begin by establishing clear program objectives linked to business risk, defining acceptable scope boundaries and escalation pathways that map to incident response and executive reporting. Integrate crowdsourced findings into CI/CD pipelines and change management processes so that validated vulnerabilities become prioritized development work items rather than isolated tickets.
Next, rationalize vendor ecosystems by selecting platforms that offer native workflow integrations and proven triage automation, while relying on specialized partners for high-skill engagements such as red teaming or medical device analysis. Strengthen contractual terms to cover validation SLAs, data protection obligations, and IP clarity. Invest in community governance by setting transparent researcher eligibility and reward frameworks that attract higher-caliber contributors while reducing duplicate or low-value submissions.
Finally, align program funding with expected operational outcomes rather than transactional metrics. Build cross-functional governance with procurement, legal, and engineering, and pilot tiered program approaches that calibrate scope and incentives based on application criticality. These steps will help organizations derive predictable assurance from crowdsourced testing while minimizing management overhead and exposure.
A transparent, practitioner-driven research approach combining primary interviews, secondary standards analysis, and vendor capability triangulation to produce actionable program insights
This research relies on a structured methodology that combines primary qualitative interviews with practitioners, secondary literature review of industry standards and regulatory guidance, and synthesis of vendor capability statements to produce actionable insights. Primary engagements included conversations with security leaders, program managers, procurement specialists, and researcher community representatives to capture operational realities, program design trade-offs, and common barriers to adoption. These firsthand perspectives were triangulated with public regulatory guidance and well-established security frameworks to ensure alignment with compliance expectations.
The secondary analysis focused on identifying capability trends across platforms and managed service providers, examining how automation, orchestration, and developer integrations are being operationalized. Care was taken to validate claims regarding program practices and delivery models through cross-validation with multiple practitioner sources and anonymized program artifacts where available. Throughout the analysis, attention was paid to contextual factors such as regional regulatory regimes, procurement constraints, and the evolving skills distribution of external researcher communities.
Finally, findings were synthesized into practical recommendations, segmentation insights, and regionally informed observations intended to help leaders design defensible, effective crowdsourced security programs that integrate with broader enterprise risk management practices.
A strategic synthesis emphasizing integration of crowdsourced findings into continuous assurance, governance, and cross-functional execution to reduce enterprise exposure
In conclusion, crowdsourced security has matured into a strategic capability that complements internal testing and accelerates vulnerability discovery while demanding disciplined governance, integration, and vendor management. Organizations that embrace hybrid testing portfolios-combining bug bounties, code review, red teaming, and continuous vulnerability assessment-are better positioned to surface complex vulnerabilities and ensure remediation is operationalized through developer workflows. Regional and tariff-driven procurement dynamics further underscore the importance of flexible deployment options and vendor contracts that accommodate supply chain variability.
Leaders should therefore prioritize initiatives that embed crowdsourced outputs into continuous assurance cycles, shore up contractual protections and evidence trails, and invest in community governance to attract higher-quality contributions. By doing so, enterprises can reduce exposure, demonstrate due diligence to regulators and customers, and convert external testing into a repeatable source of actionable intelligence. These imperatives require cross-functional leadership, measurable governance, and a commitment to integrating external insights with internal engineering velocity and incident response capabilities.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the strategic necessity of crowdsourced testing as a core component of resilient digital risk management for executive decision-makers
The executive introduction establishes the imperative for modern organizations to integrate crowdsourced security into their broader risk management strategies, emphasizing the dual objectives of rapid vulnerability discovery and continuous assurance. Crowdsourced programs are now a strategic lever, not merely a tactical supplement, enabling security teams to extend testing capacity, surface high-impact findings earlier in the software lifecycle, and benchmark program maturity against evolving threat dynamics.
Across industries, security leaders are balancing the need to accelerate digital transformation while maintaining robust control frameworks. As a result, programs that combine bug bounty initiatives, structured code review, red teaming, and continuous vulnerability assessment are gaining prominence. These hybrid approaches foster collaboration between internal teams and vetted external researchers, amplifying coverage across web, mobile, and infrastructure attack surfaces.
Transitioning from siloed seasonal testing to an always-on crowdsourced model requires leadership commitment, tailored incentives, and integration with secure development and incident response workflows. This introduction therefore frames the narrative for decision-makers who must prioritize investments that enhance detection velocity, reduce mean time to remediation, and align with compliance and procurement expectations.
How automation, regulatory shifts, and evolving researcher specialization are forcing program redesigns and governance modernization across organizations
The landscape of crowdsourced security is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological innovation, regulatory evolution, and changing attacker economics. Emerging automation and orchestration tools are enabling program managers to triage and validate submissions faster, while integrations with developer pipelines are converting vulnerability intelligence into prioritized remediation tasks. These changes are altering the relationship between external researchers and internal engineering teams, pushing organizations to formalize program governance and escalation pathways.
Simultaneously, regulatory focus on software security and critical infrastructure is prompting more rigorous program documentation and evidence-driven assurance. This regulatory pressure, paired with rising litigation and contractual security expectations, is increasing demand for demonstrable testing breadth and repeatable processes. In turn, service providers and internal security teams are adapting delivery models that emphasize transparent scopes, standardized vulnerability taxonomies, and measurable remediation SLAs.
Moreover, the skill distribution of external researcher communities is maturing; specialized expertise in mobile application pentesting, cloud configuration assessment, and advanced red teaming is more accessible, prompting organizations to refine scopes and reward structures to attract high-quality contributions. As a result, leaders must reassess program design to capture these capabilities while maintaining control over exposure and compliance risks.
Understanding how 2025 United States tariff adjustments reshape procurement, vendor selection, and deployment strategies for crowdsourced security programs
The cumulative policy shifts affecting cross-border trade and supply chains have a material influence on the operational calculus of crowdsourced security programs, particularly through the lens of tariff changes enacted by the United States in 2025. These trade measures have altered procurement cost structures for hardware, third-party testing platforms, and managed services, prompting security leaders to reassess vendor selection and deployment strategies. In response, some organizations are optimizing for local sourcing or renegotiating service terms to offset increased import costs.
Consequently, program owners are recalibrating budgets and prioritizing investments that yield higher assurance per dollar spent. This is accelerating the adoption of cloud-based testing platforms, which can reduce dependence on imported physical tools and enable on-demand scaling of researcher participation. At the same time, tariffs have encouraged some enterprises to localize portions of their security operations or select vendors with regional delivery models to minimize exposure to cross-border cost volatility.
Transitioning through these dynamics requires careful contract management, an emphasis on total cost of ownership, and closer collaboration between security, procurement, and legal functions. Organizations that proactively map tariff impacts to program design options can maintain momentum in vulnerability discovery while preserving fiscal discipline and supply chain resilience.
A comprehensive segmentation-driven perspective showing how testing type, deployment model, organization scale, and vertical nuances determine program design and outcomes
A nuanced segmentation framework illuminates where program design choices and outcomes diverge across testing modalities, deployment preferences, organizational scale, and industry-specific risk profiles. Based on Security Testing Type, practitioners are balancing programs that include Bug Bounty Programs, Code Review, Mobile Application Pentesting, Network Infrastructure Pentesting, Penetration Testing, Red Teaming, Security Audits, Threat Hunting, Vulnerability Assessment, and Web Application Pentesting to achieve complementary coverage and expertise. Programs that combine continuous external discovery with targeted red team engagements and structured code review tend to identify systemic weaknesses earlier and support developer remediation workflows more effectively.
Based on Deployment Model, organizations must weigh Cloud and On Premises options, with cloud choices further subdivided into Private Cloud and Public Cloud approaches; public cloud deployment offers scalability and reduced capital exposure, whereas private cloud or on-premises setups provide tighter control for regulated environments. Based on Organization Size, the program architecture varies markedly between Large Enterprises and Small And Medium Enterprises, with Small And Medium Enterprises further categorized into Medium Enterprises and Small Enterprises; larger organizations often require multi-tiered governance and vendor management, while smaller entities benefit from curated, platform-led experiences that reduce administrative overhead.
Based on Industry Vertical, the program requirements reflect distinct regulatory and operational imperatives across Banking Financial Services And Insurance, Government Public Sector, Healthcare, IT And Telecommunications, and Retail E Commerce. Banking Financial Services And Insurance subdivides into Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance, each demanding high assurance and auditability. Government Public Sector splits into Federal Government and State And Local Government, where procurement rules and transparency obligations shape program scope. Healthcare’s subsegments of Hospitals, Medical Devices, and Pharmaceuticals impose patient-safety considerations and data privacy constraints. IT And Telecommunications’ IT Services And Consulting and Telecom Operators require resilience at scale, and Retail E Commerce’s Brick And Mortar Retail and E Commerce channels emphasize customer-facing application security and transaction integrity. By aligning program modalities to these segmentation axes, leaders can design testing regimens that are proportionate to both risk and operational realities.
How regional legal frameworks, talent availability, and cloud adoption patterns across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape program execution and governance
Regional dynamics materially influence the adoption, governance, and operational execution of crowdsourced security initiatives. In the Americas, mature commercial ecosystems and a dense vendor landscape support a wide range of program models from public-facing bug bounties to enterprise-grade managed services, while legal and procurement frameworks vary significantly between jurisdictions, shaping contractual safeguards and researcher disclosure policies. Transitioning across national boundaries within this region often requires harmonizing program rules with local data protection and export control considerations.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization efforts and heightened privacy regimes drive demand for privacy-preserving testing approaches and more stringent researcher vetting. Market maturity varies across subregions, with leading European markets emphasizing formal assurance frameworks and continental regulatory alignment, whereas some Middle Eastern and African markets are rapidly adopting cloud-enabled platforms to accelerate capability building. Consequently, program architects need to balance global consistency with local compliance and talent availability.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid digital adoption and a diverse threat landscape motivate aggressive uptake of crowdsourced testing, particularly across mobile and e-commerce use cases. The region’s mix of established and emerging markets encourages hybrid deployment strategies that align public cloud scalability with localized delivery models. As a result, organizations operating across these regions must design interoperable policies that respect regional legal regimes while enabling coordinated vulnerability management efforts.
Insights into how platform innovation, managed orchestration, and community governance are differentiating vendors and reshaping enterprise buying criteria
Key company insights focus on how vendors, platform providers, and service integrators are evolving to meet enterprise requirements for scale, compliance, and measurable remediation outcomes. Leading platforms are investing in automation to accelerate triage and integrate seamlessly with developer toolchains, while managed service partners are differentiating through verticalized expertise and evidence-based reporting that aligns to regulatory and audit needs. Strategic partnerships between platform providers and specialized testing firms enable deeper coverage across mobile, web, and infrastructure attack surfaces without imposing excessive vendor management burdens on customers.
Additionally, some companies are developing managed vulnerability orchestration capabilities that convert crowdsourced findings into prioritized remediation backlogs and verified fixes. This shift reduces the operational lift for internal security teams and helps ensure that high-severity findings translate into measurable risk reduction. Market leaders are also formalizing researcher communities with clear onboarding, code of conduct frameworks, and structured incentives to cultivate high-quality contributions and improve signal-to-noise ratios.
For procurement and legal teams, vendor selection increasingly hinges on the ability to demonstrate robust data handling, SLAs for validation, and transparent pricing models. Companies that can articulate a defensible governance model, strong remediation support, and alignment with industry-specific compliance expectations are best positioned to win enterprise-level engagements.
Practical governance, platform selection, and integration strategies to convert crowdsourced vulnerability findings into prioritized remediation and lasting risk reduction
Actionable recommendations for leaders focus on pragmatic steps to strengthen program outcomes while containing risk and cost. Begin by establishing clear program objectives linked to business risk, defining acceptable scope boundaries and escalation pathways that map to incident response and executive reporting. Integrate crowdsourced findings into CI/CD pipelines and change management processes so that validated vulnerabilities become prioritized development work items rather than isolated tickets.
Next, rationalize vendor ecosystems by selecting platforms that offer native workflow integrations and proven triage automation, while relying on specialized partners for high-skill engagements such as red teaming or medical device analysis. Strengthen contractual terms to cover validation SLAs, data protection obligations, and IP clarity. Invest in community governance by setting transparent researcher eligibility and reward frameworks that attract higher-caliber contributors while reducing duplicate or low-value submissions.
Finally, align program funding with expected operational outcomes rather than transactional metrics. Build cross-functional governance with procurement, legal, and engineering, and pilot tiered program approaches that calibrate scope and incentives based on application criticality. These steps will help organizations derive predictable assurance from crowdsourced testing while minimizing management overhead and exposure.
A transparent, practitioner-driven research approach combining primary interviews, secondary standards analysis, and vendor capability triangulation to produce actionable program insights
This research relies on a structured methodology that combines primary qualitative interviews with practitioners, secondary literature review of industry standards and regulatory guidance, and synthesis of vendor capability statements to produce actionable insights. Primary engagements included conversations with security leaders, program managers, procurement specialists, and researcher community representatives to capture operational realities, program design trade-offs, and common barriers to adoption. These firsthand perspectives were triangulated with public regulatory guidance and well-established security frameworks to ensure alignment with compliance expectations.
The secondary analysis focused on identifying capability trends across platforms and managed service providers, examining how automation, orchestration, and developer integrations are being operationalized. Care was taken to validate claims regarding program practices and delivery models through cross-validation with multiple practitioner sources and anonymized program artifacts where available. Throughout the analysis, attention was paid to contextual factors such as regional regulatory regimes, procurement constraints, and the evolving skills distribution of external researcher communities.
Finally, findings were synthesized into practical recommendations, segmentation insights, and regionally informed observations intended to help leaders design defensible, effective crowdsourced security programs that integrate with broader enterprise risk management practices.
A strategic synthesis emphasizing integration of crowdsourced findings into continuous assurance, governance, and cross-functional execution to reduce enterprise exposure
In conclusion, crowdsourced security has matured into a strategic capability that complements internal testing and accelerates vulnerability discovery while demanding disciplined governance, integration, and vendor management. Organizations that embrace hybrid testing portfolios-combining bug bounties, code review, red teaming, and continuous vulnerability assessment-are better positioned to surface complex vulnerabilities and ensure remediation is operationalized through developer workflows. Regional and tariff-driven procurement dynamics further underscore the importance of flexible deployment options and vendor contracts that accommodate supply chain variability.
Leaders should therefore prioritize initiatives that embed crowdsourced outputs into continuous assurance cycles, shore up contractual protections and evidence trails, and invest in community governance to attract higher-quality contributions. By doing so, enterprises can reduce exposure, demonstrate due diligence to regulators and customers, and convert external testing into a repeatable source of actionable intelligence. These imperatives require cross-functional leadership, measurable governance, and a commitment to integrating external insights with internal engineering velocity and incident response capabilities.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
188 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Increasing integration of artificial intelligence tools into bug bounty triage workflows to optimize vulnerability validation
- 5.2. Emergence of unified crowdsourced security platforms consolidating vulnerability reporting and remediation across enterprises
- 5.3. Growth of specialized IoT and OT bug bounty programs addressing critical infrastructure and connected device vulnerabilities
- 5.4. Evolution of monetary reward structures influencing researcher participation and retention in global crowdsecurity communities
- 5.5. Regulatory compliance pressures driving formalized crowdsourced vulnerability disclosure programs across finance and healthcare
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Crowdsourced Security Market, by Security Testing Type
- 8.1. Bug Bounty Programs
- 8.2. Code Review
- 8.3. Mobile Application Pentesting
- 8.4. Network Infrastructure Pentesting
- 8.5. Penetration Testing
- 8.6. Red Teaming
- 8.7. Security Audits
- 8.8. Threat Hunting
- 8.9. Vulnerability Assessment
- 8.10. Web Application Pentesting
- 9. Crowdsourced Security Market, by Deployment Model
- 9.1. Cloud
- 9.1.1. Private Cloud
- 9.1.2. Public Cloud
- 9.2. On Premises
- 10. Crowdsourced Security Market, by Organization Size
- 10.1. Large Enterprises
- 10.2. Small And Medium Enterprises
- 10.2.1. Medium Enterprises
- 10.2.2. Small Enterprises
- 11. Crowdsourced Security Market, by Industry Vertical
- 11.1. Banking Financial Services And Insurance
- 11.1.1. Banking
- 11.1.2. Financial Services
- 11.1.3. Insurance
- 11.2. Government Public Sector
- 11.2.1. Federal Government
- 11.2.2. State And Local Government
- 11.3. Healthcare
- 11.3.1. Hospitals
- 11.3.2. Medical Devices
- 11.3.3. Pharmaceuticals
- 11.4. IT And Telecommunications
- 11.4.1. IT Services And Consulting
- 11.4.2. Telecom Operators
- 11.5. Retail E Commerce
- 11.5.1. Brick And Mortar Retail
- 11.5.2. E Commerce
- 12. Crowdsourced Security Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Crowdsourced Security Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Crowdsourced Security Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Aqua Security Software Ltd.
- 15.3.2. Bugcrowd, Inc.
- 15.3.3. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
- 15.3.4. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 15.3.5. Cloudflare, Inc.
- 15.3.6. Cobalt Security, Inc.
- 15.3.7. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
- 15.3.8. Detectify AB
- 15.3.9. Fortinet, Inc.
- 15.3.10. Hacken OÜ
- 15.3.11. HackerOne, Inc.
- 15.3.12. International Business Machines Corporation
- 15.3.13. Intigriti BV
- 15.3.14. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
- 15.3.15. Qualys, Inc.
- 15.3.16. SentinelOne, Inc.
- 15.3.17. Synack, Inc.
- 15.3.18. Tenable Holdings, Inc.
- 15.3.19. Wiz, Ltd.
- 15.3.20. YesWeHack SAS
- 15.3.21. Yogosha SAS
- 15.3.22. Zerocopter NV
- 15.3.23. Zscaler, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
