Corrosion Monitoring Market by Type (Intrusive Monitoring, Non-Intrusive Monitoring), Offering (Hardware, Services, Software), Technique, End-Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Corrosion Monitoring Market was valued at USD 498.20 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 532.20 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.19%, reaching USD 868.30 million by 2032.
A strategic introduction to how corrosion monitoring transforms asset integrity programs by combining instrumentation and analytics for safer, more reliable operations
Corrosion monitoring sits at the intersection of materials science, instrumentation engineering, and operational risk management, offering asset owners a pragmatic way to detect degradation before it becomes catastrophic. In recent years, industrial operators have moved from periodic, manual inspection toward continuous, data-driven monitoring that supports predictive maintenance, extended asset life, and safer operations. This shift reflects broader industrial priorities: enhanced uptime, regulatory compliance, and the efficient allocation of scarce maintenance budgets. As organizations confront aging infrastructure, stricter safety oversight, and the need to optimize emissions and energy performance, corrosion monitoring has become a strategic capability rather than a tactical expense.
Introduction to modern corrosion monitoring must therefore emphasize both the hardware that captures environmental and electrochemical signals and the analytics layers that transform sensor outputs into actionable insights. Practitioners increasingly expect integrated solutions that combine robust field instruments with service offerings and software platforms capable of contextualizing trends and recommending interventions. From high-risk process streams in chemical and petrochemical facilities to asset-intensive sectors such as oil and gas and power generation, the ability to detect localized pitting, uniform corrosion, or underdeposit corrosion early materially reduces the probability of unplanned outages. As a result, investment in condition awareness is often benchmarked against its ability to defer capital expenditure while enhancing safety and regulatory standing.
How technological advancements and service model evolution are redefining corrosion monitoring into proactive, integrated, outcomes-focused asset integrity systems
The landscape for corrosion monitoring is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, digitization of industrial operations, and evolving regulatory expectations. Advances in sensor design, materials science, and low-power electronics have expanded the range of deployable monitoring options, making intrusive probes more robust and non-intrusive methods more sensitive and practical for continuous use. Simultaneously, edge computing and cloud-native analytics allow real-time processing of electrochemical signals, enabling anomaly detection and automated alerts that were previously constrained by manual interpretation.
At the same time, service models are evolving from transactional maintenance tasks toward outcome-based agreements where vendors and service providers take on performance risk and guarantee levels of asset availability. This shift incentivizes better data quality and standardized reporting, which, in turn, accelerates broader adoption. Moreover, integration of corrosion monitoring into digital asset management and enterprise maintenance systems is becoming the expectation rather than the exception, helping bridge gaps between corrosion specialists, operations teams, and executive stakeholders. Collectively, these shifts are making monitoring programs more proactive, transparent, and directly tied to operational metrics that matter to senior leadership.
Analyzing how United States tariff measures in 2025 reshape procurement strategies, supplier portfolios, and inventory practices across corrosion monitoring programs
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures can create complex downstream effects on supply chains for sensors, probes, and instrumentation components used in corrosion monitoring programs. Since many precision components, specialized alloys, and electronic subsystems are traded globally, tariff changes in 2025 have implications for capital procurement cycles, sourcing strategies, and total landed cost for hardware. Procurement managers are responding by re-evaluating supplier portfolios, increasing emphasis on regional sourcing, and accelerating qualification of alternative manufacturers to maintain procurement agility.
Beyond direct cost impacts, tariffs influence inventory policies and lead times, prompting facilities to reassess spare parts strategies and to invest more heavily in predictive diagnostics that reduce emergency sourcing needs. In parallel, some organizations are shifting toward service contracts that bundle hardware with long-term maintenance and calibration, thereby transferring inventory risk and smoothing budgetary exposure to trade-driven price volatility. Additionally, tariffs can accelerate localization of manufacturing for key components, which benefits regional supply resilience but may alter the innovation pipeline if specialized suppliers face constrained market access. Ultimately, trade policy changes underscore the importance of flexible procurement, diversified supplier bases, and stronger contractual protections to preserve program continuity.
In-depth segmentation insights showing how type, technique, offering, and end-use considerations dictate technology selection and deployment strategies across industrial sectors
Segment-level insights reveal that market adoption and technology selection are influenced by application requirements, deployment constraints, and operational priorities. Based on Type, the distinction between Intrusive Monitoring and Non-Intrusive Monitoring often dictates acceptable installation windows, maintenance burdens, and the degree of direct electrochemical measurement achievable. Intrusive techniques provide direct contact with the process environment and typically deliver high-resolution, localized degradation data, while non-intrusive approaches offer reduced process disruption and are frequently preferred where tapping the process is impractical or prohibited.
Based on Technique, operators choose among Corrosion Coupons, Electrical Resistance (ER) Probes, Galvanic Monitoring, and Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR) Probes depending on the failure mode of concern, the need for cumulative loss measurement versus instantaneous corrosion rate, and compatibility with process chemistry. Corrosion coupons remain a simple reference for cumulative damage but require manual retrieval, whereas ER probes and LPR probes support more continuous data streams and can better inform condition-based decisions. Galvanic monitoring offers a lower-cost route for trend detection in specific environments.
Based on Offering, the ecosystem comprises Hardware, Services, and Software that together deliver an end-to-end integrity solution. Hardware must be ruggedized and materials-compatible, services include installation, calibration, and interpretation, and software is increasingly central to turning raw signals into risk-ranked recommendations. Based on End-Use, industry sectors such as Chemical & Petrochemical, Oil & Gas, and Power Generation each present unique exposure profiles, regulatory scrutiny, and operational tolerances that influence the selection of monitoring modalities and the acceptable cadence of inspection and intervention.
Comparative regional analysis underscoring how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics govern adoption, procurement, and implementation approaches
Regional dynamics shape the adoption curves and procurement logic for corrosion monitoring systems, often reflecting local industrial structure, regulatory regimes, and supply chain maturity. In the Americas, end users commonly face a combination of aging infrastructure and stringent safety oversight that drives demand for continuous monitoring and advanced analytics. Domestic manufacturing capability for sensors and instrumentation is strong, which supports rapid rollouts but also concentrates competition and drives differentiation toward service layers and software integration.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape where regulatory regimes and investment appetites vary widely. Mature economies in Europe emphasize environmental compliance and digital integration, encouraging sophisticated analytics and lifecycle management approaches, while markets across the Middle East are often led by large-scale capital projects where corrosion monitoring is integrated early into design and construction. Africa features pockets of demand centered on extractive industries, where resilient, low-maintenance solutions are prized.
Asia-Pacific combines high-volume industrial expansion with a broad range of facility vintages, creating demand both for retrofit monitoring of older assets and for integrated monitoring in new megaprojects. Manufacturing capacity in the region increasingly supports localized supply, and rapid digitization initiatives are accelerating adoption of connected sensors and cloud-based analytics. Across all regions, cross-border supply considerations and local service ecosystems substantially influence implementation timelines and total program effectiveness.
Key competitive and partnership insights revealing how manufacturers, service specialists, software providers, and integrators drive differentiation in corrosion monitoring
Competitive dynamics in the corrosion monitoring domain are defined by the interplay among established instrumentation manufacturers, specialized service providers, software analytics firms, and integrators that bring these capabilities together into turnkey programs. Established manufacturers typically compete on robustness, long-term reliability, and regulatory pedigree, while newer entrants emphasize digital platforms, cloud-native analytics, and flexible deployment models that reduce time to insight. Service providers add value through domain expertise, offering interpretive services, on-site calibration, and lifecycle support that convert instrument readings into prioritized maintenance actions.
Interoperability and open communication standards have become important differentiators, allowing customers to integrate monitoring outputs with enterprise asset management systems and to standardize reporting across multi-site operations. Strategic partnerships between hardware vendors and software analytics firms are increasingly common, as vendors seek to offer bundled solutions that lower the barrier to entry for operations teams. In parallel, specialist consultancies and independent labs maintain relevance by validating methodologies and assisting with regulatory documentation and root cause analysis. For buyers, vendor selection increasingly hinges on demonstrated field performance, quality of after-sales service, and the ability to deliver cross-disciplinary insights that align corrosion metrics with operational KPIs.
Actionable recommendations for asset owners and vendors to align monitoring deployment, procurement, workforce capability, and supplier resilience with operational priorities
Industry leaders should prioritize an integrated approach that combines durable field instrumentation, robust service contracts, and sophisticated analytics to convert measurements into tangible risk reduction. First, asset owners should adopt a risk-based deployment strategy that aligns monitoring density with consequence and likelihood matrices; this approach concentrates investment where failure impacts are greatest and avoids costly over-instrumentation. Second, procurement practices must evolve to emphasize total cost of ownership; evaluating suppliers on service responsiveness, calibration regimes, and spare parts availability is as important as upfront hardware price.
Third, organizations should accelerate integration of corrosion monitoring outputs with enterprise maintenance systems and operational dashboards to ensure that data results in timely work orders and root cause investigations. Fourth, investing in workforce capability-both in corrosion science and in data analytics-will be essential for translating signals into interventions and for building confidence among frontline operators. Fifth, leaders should consider outcome-based service models where appropriate, shifting some performance risk to providers while leveraging service-level agreements to guarantee response times and measurement fidelity. Finally, diversification of suppliers and geographic sourcing can mitigate tariff-driven supply shocks and help preserve program continuity in volatile trade environments.
A transparent, practitioner-informed research methodology combining interviews, technical validation, and standards review to support actionable, reproducible insights
This research relied on a multi-method approach combining primary qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, technical validation by subject-matter experts, and a structured review of standards and regulatory guidance relevant to corrosion monitoring and asset integrity management. Primary inputs included discussions with corrosion engineers, maintenance managers, and procurement professionals across multiple industrial sectors, providing ground-level perspectives on deployment barriers, performance expectations, and service preferences. These practitioner insights were triangulated with technical literature, vendor product documentation, and publicly available case studies to ensure that device-level claims were validated against real-world operational constraints.
Analytical steps included mapping common deployment architectures, comparing technique suitability against failure modes, and assessing the implications of supply chain and trade dynamics on procurement practices. Wherever possible, the methodology emphasized reproducibility and transparency: assumptions underlying qualitative synthesis are documented, and areas where evidence was limited are identified as topics for follow-up inquiry. The research therefore supports both strategic decision-making and tactical program design by blending practitioner experience with technical validation and supply chain awareness.
Concluding synthesis emphasizing the strategic value of integrated corrosion monitoring and the operational steps needed to sustain effective asset integrity programs
In conclusion, corrosion monitoring has evolved from a periodic inspection practice into a strategic asset integrity capability that blends instrumentation, services, and analytics to deliver measurable reductions in unplanned downtime and regulatory risk. Technological advances in sensors and analytics, shifting service models, and changing trade dynamics are collectively shaping how organizations design and sustain monitoring programs. The most successful implementations are those that align monitoring density with risk, integrate outputs into enterprise maintenance workflows, and prioritize supplier relationships that balance innovation with operational reliability.
Looking forward, organizations that invest in interoperable systems, skilled personnel, and contractual structures that mitigate supply chain volatility will be best positioned to capture the full value of condition-aware maintenance. Effective corrosion monitoring programs are not static investments; they evolve as process conditions change, new failure modes emerge, and analytics techniques mature. Therefore, a measured, risk-informed approach that combines technical rigor with operational pragmatism will yield the strongest outcomes for safety, uptime, and lifecycle cost control.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction to how corrosion monitoring transforms asset integrity programs by combining instrumentation and analytics for safer, more reliable operations
Corrosion monitoring sits at the intersection of materials science, instrumentation engineering, and operational risk management, offering asset owners a pragmatic way to detect degradation before it becomes catastrophic. In recent years, industrial operators have moved from periodic, manual inspection toward continuous, data-driven monitoring that supports predictive maintenance, extended asset life, and safer operations. This shift reflects broader industrial priorities: enhanced uptime, regulatory compliance, and the efficient allocation of scarce maintenance budgets. As organizations confront aging infrastructure, stricter safety oversight, and the need to optimize emissions and energy performance, corrosion monitoring has become a strategic capability rather than a tactical expense.
Introduction to modern corrosion monitoring must therefore emphasize both the hardware that captures environmental and electrochemical signals and the analytics layers that transform sensor outputs into actionable insights. Practitioners increasingly expect integrated solutions that combine robust field instruments with service offerings and software platforms capable of contextualizing trends and recommending interventions. From high-risk process streams in chemical and petrochemical facilities to asset-intensive sectors such as oil and gas and power generation, the ability to detect localized pitting, uniform corrosion, or underdeposit corrosion early materially reduces the probability of unplanned outages. As a result, investment in condition awareness is often benchmarked against its ability to defer capital expenditure while enhancing safety and regulatory standing.
How technological advancements and service model evolution are redefining corrosion monitoring into proactive, integrated, outcomes-focused asset integrity systems
The landscape for corrosion monitoring is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, digitization of industrial operations, and evolving regulatory expectations. Advances in sensor design, materials science, and low-power electronics have expanded the range of deployable monitoring options, making intrusive probes more robust and non-intrusive methods more sensitive and practical for continuous use. Simultaneously, edge computing and cloud-native analytics allow real-time processing of electrochemical signals, enabling anomaly detection and automated alerts that were previously constrained by manual interpretation.
At the same time, service models are evolving from transactional maintenance tasks toward outcome-based agreements where vendors and service providers take on performance risk and guarantee levels of asset availability. This shift incentivizes better data quality and standardized reporting, which, in turn, accelerates broader adoption. Moreover, integration of corrosion monitoring into digital asset management and enterprise maintenance systems is becoming the expectation rather than the exception, helping bridge gaps between corrosion specialists, operations teams, and executive stakeholders. Collectively, these shifts are making monitoring programs more proactive, transparent, and directly tied to operational metrics that matter to senior leadership.
Analyzing how United States tariff measures in 2025 reshape procurement strategies, supplier portfolios, and inventory practices across corrosion monitoring programs
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures can create complex downstream effects on supply chains for sensors, probes, and instrumentation components used in corrosion monitoring programs. Since many precision components, specialized alloys, and electronic subsystems are traded globally, tariff changes in 2025 have implications for capital procurement cycles, sourcing strategies, and total landed cost for hardware. Procurement managers are responding by re-evaluating supplier portfolios, increasing emphasis on regional sourcing, and accelerating qualification of alternative manufacturers to maintain procurement agility.
Beyond direct cost impacts, tariffs influence inventory policies and lead times, prompting facilities to reassess spare parts strategies and to invest more heavily in predictive diagnostics that reduce emergency sourcing needs. In parallel, some organizations are shifting toward service contracts that bundle hardware with long-term maintenance and calibration, thereby transferring inventory risk and smoothing budgetary exposure to trade-driven price volatility. Additionally, tariffs can accelerate localization of manufacturing for key components, which benefits regional supply resilience but may alter the innovation pipeline if specialized suppliers face constrained market access. Ultimately, trade policy changes underscore the importance of flexible procurement, diversified supplier bases, and stronger contractual protections to preserve program continuity.
In-depth segmentation insights showing how type, technique, offering, and end-use considerations dictate technology selection and deployment strategies across industrial sectors
Segment-level insights reveal that market adoption and technology selection are influenced by application requirements, deployment constraints, and operational priorities. Based on Type, the distinction between Intrusive Monitoring and Non-Intrusive Monitoring often dictates acceptable installation windows, maintenance burdens, and the degree of direct electrochemical measurement achievable. Intrusive techniques provide direct contact with the process environment and typically deliver high-resolution, localized degradation data, while non-intrusive approaches offer reduced process disruption and are frequently preferred where tapping the process is impractical or prohibited.
Based on Technique, operators choose among Corrosion Coupons, Electrical Resistance (ER) Probes, Galvanic Monitoring, and Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR) Probes depending on the failure mode of concern, the need for cumulative loss measurement versus instantaneous corrosion rate, and compatibility with process chemistry. Corrosion coupons remain a simple reference for cumulative damage but require manual retrieval, whereas ER probes and LPR probes support more continuous data streams and can better inform condition-based decisions. Galvanic monitoring offers a lower-cost route for trend detection in specific environments.
Based on Offering, the ecosystem comprises Hardware, Services, and Software that together deliver an end-to-end integrity solution. Hardware must be ruggedized and materials-compatible, services include installation, calibration, and interpretation, and software is increasingly central to turning raw signals into risk-ranked recommendations. Based on End-Use, industry sectors such as Chemical & Petrochemical, Oil & Gas, and Power Generation each present unique exposure profiles, regulatory scrutiny, and operational tolerances that influence the selection of monitoring modalities and the acceptable cadence of inspection and intervention.
Comparative regional analysis underscoring how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics govern adoption, procurement, and implementation approaches
Regional dynamics shape the adoption curves and procurement logic for corrosion monitoring systems, often reflecting local industrial structure, regulatory regimes, and supply chain maturity. In the Americas, end users commonly face a combination of aging infrastructure and stringent safety oversight that drives demand for continuous monitoring and advanced analytics. Domestic manufacturing capability for sensors and instrumentation is strong, which supports rapid rollouts but also concentrates competition and drives differentiation toward service layers and software integration.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape where regulatory regimes and investment appetites vary widely. Mature economies in Europe emphasize environmental compliance and digital integration, encouraging sophisticated analytics and lifecycle management approaches, while markets across the Middle East are often led by large-scale capital projects where corrosion monitoring is integrated early into design and construction. Africa features pockets of demand centered on extractive industries, where resilient, low-maintenance solutions are prized.
Asia-Pacific combines high-volume industrial expansion with a broad range of facility vintages, creating demand both for retrofit monitoring of older assets and for integrated monitoring in new megaprojects. Manufacturing capacity in the region increasingly supports localized supply, and rapid digitization initiatives are accelerating adoption of connected sensors and cloud-based analytics. Across all regions, cross-border supply considerations and local service ecosystems substantially influence implementation timelines and total program effectiveness.
Key competitive and partnership insights revealing how manufacturers, service specialists, software providers, and integrators drive differentiation in corrosion monitoring
Competitive dynamics in the corrosion monitoring domain are defined by the interplay among established instrumentation manufacturers, specialized service providers, software analytics firms, and integrators that bring these capabilities together into turnkey programs. Established manufacturers typically compete on robustness, long-term reliability, and regulatory pedigree, while newer entrants emphasize digital platforms, cloud-native analytics, and flexible deployment models that reduce time to insight. Service providers add value through domain expertise, offering interpretive services, on-site calibration, and lifecycle support that convert instrument readings into prioritized maintenance actions.
Interoperability and open communication standards have become important differentiators, allowing customers to integrate monitoring outputs with enterprise asset management systems and to standardize reporting across multi-site operations. Strategic partnerships between hardware vendors and software analytics firms are increasingly common, as vendors seek to offer bundled solutions that lower the barrier to entry for operations teams. In parallel, specialist consultancies and independent labs maintain relevance by validating methodologies and assisting with regulatory documentation and root cause analysis. For buyers, vendor selection increasingly hinges on demonstrated field performance, quality of after-sales service, and the ability to deliver cross-disciplinary insights that align corrosion metrics with operational KPIs.
Actionable recommendations for asset owners and vendors to align monitoring deployment, procurement, workforce capability, and supplier resilience with operational priorities
Industry leaders should prioritize an integrated approach that combines durable field instrumentation, robust service contracts, and sophisticated analytics to convert measurements into tangible risk reduction. First, asset owners should adopt a risk-based deployment strategy that aligns monitoring density with consequence and likelihood matrices; this approach concentrates investment where failure impacts are greatest and avoids costly over-instrumentation. Second, procurement practices must evolve to emphasize total cost of ownership; evaluating suppliers on service responsiveness, calibration regimes, and spare parts availability is as important as upfront hardware price.
Third, organizations should accelerate integration of corrosion monitoring outputs with enterprise maintenance systems and operational dashboards to ensure that data results in timely work orders and root cause investigations. Fourth, investing in workforce capability-both in corrosion science and in data analytics-will be essential for translating signals into interventions and for building confidence among frontline operators. Fifth, leaders should consider outcome-based service models where appropriate, shifting some performance risk to providers while leveraging service-level agreements to guarantee response times and measurement fidelity. Finally, diversification of suppliers and geographic sourcing can mitigate tariff-driven supply shocks and help preserve program continuity in volatile trade environments.
A transparent, practitioner-informed research methodology combining interviews, technical validation, and standards review to support actionable, reproducible insights
This research relied on a multi-method approach combining primary qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, technical validation by subject-matter experts, and a structured review of standards and regulatory guidance relevant to corrosion monitoring and asset integrity management. Primary inputs included discussions with corrosion engineers, maintenance managers, and procurement professionals across multiple industrial sectors, providing ground-level perspectives on deployment barriers, performance expectations, and service preferences. These practitioner insights were triangulated with technical literature, vendor product documentation, and publicly available case studies to ensure that device-level claims were validated against real-world operational constraints.
Analytical steps included mapping common deployment architectures, comparing technique suitability against failure modes, and assessing the implications of supply chain and trade dynamics on procurement practices. Wherever possible, the methodology emphasized reproducibility and transparency: assumptions underlying qualitative synthesis are documented, and areas where evidence was limited are identified as topics for follow-up inquiry. The research therefore supports both strategic decision-making and tactical program design by blending practitioner experience with technical validation and supply chain awareness.
Concluding synthesis emphasizing the strategic value of integrated corrosion monitoring and the operational steps needed to sustain effective asset integrity programs
In conclusion, corrosion monitoring has evolved from a periodic inspection practice into a strategic asset integrity capability that blends instrumentation, services, and analytics to deliver measurable reductions in unplanned downtime and regulatory risk. Technological advances in sensors and analytics, shifting service models, and changing trade dynamics are collectively shaping how organizations design and sustain monitoring programs. The most successful implementations are those that align monitoring density with risk, integrate outputs into enterprise maintenance workflows, and prioritize supplier relationships that balance innovation with operational reliability.
Looking forward, organizations that invest in interoperable systems, skilled personnel, and contractual structures that mitigate supply chain volatility will be best positioned to capture the full value of condition-aware maintenance. Effective corrosion monitoring programs are not static investments; they evolve as process conditions change, new failure modes emerge, and analytics techniques mature. Therefore, a measured, risk-informed approach that combines technical rigor with operational pragmatism will yield the strongest outcomes for safety, uptime, and lifecycle cost control.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
198 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. IoT enabled remote monitoring solutions accelerating real-time corrosion detection
- 5.2. Artificial intelligence and machine learning based predictive analytics for asset integrity management
- 5.3. Wireless sensor networks integrating edge computing for enhanced plant corrosion surveillance
- 5.4. Development of advanced nanocoatings enabling smart corrosion sensing and inhibitor release technologies
- 5.5. Cloud based big data platforms providing unified dashboards for multi asset corrosion insights
- 5.6. Fiber optic corrosion sensing deployed in subsea and offshore infrastructure for continuous monitoring
- 5.7. Adoption of guided wave ultrasonic testing for long range corrosion assessment in pipelines and tanks
- 5.8. Digital twin integration with corrosion monitoring data for proactive maintenance planning and risk mitigation
- 5.9. Use of autonomous drones equipped with corrosion detection sensors for remote inspections in hazardous zones
- 5.10. Increasing demand for eco friendly corrosion inhibitors and sustainable monitoring practices across industries
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Corrosion Monitoring Market, by Type
- 8.1. Intrusive Monitoring
- 8.2. Non-Intrusive Monitoring
- 9. Corrosion Monitoring Market, by Offering
- 9.1. Hardware
- 9.2. Services
- 9.3. Software
- 10. Corrosion Monitoring Market, by Technique
- 10.1. Corrosion Coupons
- 10.2. Electrical Resistance (ER) Probes
- 10.3. Galvanic Monitoring
- 10.4. Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR) Probes
- 11. Corrosion Monitoring Market, by End-Use
- 11.1. Chemical & Petrochemical
- 11.2. Oil & Gas
- 11.3. Power Generation
- 12. Corrosion Monitoring Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Corrosion Monitoring Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Corrosion Monitoring Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. ABB Ltd.
- 15.3.2. BAC Corrosion Control Ltd.
- 15.3.3. Denso Inc.
- 15.3.4. Emerson Electric Co.
- 15.3.5. Endress+Hauser AG
- 15.3.6. Honeywell International Inc.
- 15.3.7. Irth Solutions, L.L.C.
- 15.3.8. MISTRAS Group, Inc.
- 15.3.9. MKS Instruments, Inc.
- 15.3.10. Schneider Electric SE
- 15.3.11. Siemens AG
- 15.3.12. Teledyne Technologies, Inc.
- 15.3.13. Yokogawa Electric Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
