Coronavirus Test Kits Market by Product Type (Antibody, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Rapid Antigen), Sample Type (Blood, Nasopharyngeal Swabs, Oropharyngeal Swabs), Application, End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Coronavirus Test Kits Market was valued at USD 22.24 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 25.45 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 14.84%, reaching USD 67.29 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to current diagnostic modalities, operational realities, and strategic priorities shaping the coronavirus test kit environment for decision-makers
The global response to infectious disease testing continues to evolve rapidly, driven by advances in diagnostics, regulatory shifts, and changing patterns of healthcare utilization. This executive summary frames the current landscape of coronavirus test kits with a focus on practical implications for manufacturers, distributors, clinicians, and health system planners. It synthesizes core dynamics shaping demand, competitive behavior, and operational considerations while highlighting where strategic attention will yield the highest returns.
Beginning with a clear view of product modalities, distribution pathways, and end-user settings, the narrative connects technological capability with real-world implementation challenges. Throughout the sections that follow, the analysis links evidence on sensitivity, usability, and supply chain resilience to operational decisions such as portfolio rationalization, channel prioritization, and sample handling protocols. Ultimately, the introduction positions readers to interpret subsequent insights in a way that supports immediate action and medium-term planning.
How technological advances, regulatory agility, and supply chain resilience are reshaping diagnostic strategies, care pathways, and competitive positioning across the testing ecosystem
The testing landscape has undergone transformative shifts that extend beyond simple changes in demand volumes. Technological maturation has advanced the performance envelope of antigen, antibody, and nucleic acid assays, while parallel improvements in sample collection methods and point-of-care platforms have altered where and how testing is delivered. At the same time, regulatory frameworks have moved toward more agile pathways for emergency use and accelerated approvals, prompting manufacturers to design evidence packages that balance speed with clinical rigor.
Concurrently, supply chain resilience has become a strategic differentiator; firms that invest in diversified sourcing, regional manufacturing capabilities, and validated alternate suppliers are better positioned to withstand episodic disruptions. In addition, digital integration-ranging from electronic result reporting to telehealth-enabled test supervision-has transformed patient pathways and created new expectations for interoperability with electronic health records and public health surveillance systems. Together, these shifts require organizations to rethink product roadmaps, channel strategies, and value propositions in order to remain competitive and clinically relevant.
Understanding how 2025 tariff measures have reconfigured sourcing strategies, regional production incentives, and procurement priorities across diagnostic supply chains
Recent tariff policies implemented by the United States in 2025 have introduced new layers of cost and logistical complexity across global diagnostic supply chains. While tariffs are applied to specific imported goods, the downstream effects cascade through manufacturing inputs, contract manufacturing relationships, and distribution economics. Manufacturers that rely on cross-border component flows have faced increased unit costs and intermittent delays as sourcing strategies are reassessed and cost pass-through decisions are debated.
In response, several firms have accelerated near-shoring and regionalization efforts to mitigate exposure to tariff volatility and to secure continuity of supply. These strategic adjustments often involve capital reallocation to regional production lines, renegotiation of supplier contracts, and reassessment of product configurations to prioritize locally available components. For distributors and end users, the tariffs have heightened the importance of transparent supply chain documentation and contractual protections, with procurement teams emphasizing total landed cost analysis over unit price alone. Ultimately, the policy environment has shifted strategic attention from short-term price competition to longer-term supply resilience and contractual agility.
A multilayered segmentation framework clarifying product modalities, distribution dynamics, and end-user demands to guide product design and channel investment decisions
Insightful segmentation reveals which product types, channels, end-user settings, sample types, and applications are most influential in shaping commercial and clinical choices. Based on product type, the market is studied across Antibody, Polymerase Chain Reaction, and Rapid Antigen, with antibody methods further delineated into chemiluminescence immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay platforms, PCR approaches separated into isothermal amplification and real-time PCR formats, and rapid antigen diagnostics distinguished between fluorescent immunoassay and lateral flow immunoassay techniques; this layered view clarifies where performance, throughput, and operational footprint intersect with buyer preferences. Based on distribution channel, the market is studied across diagnostic laboratories, hospital pharmacy, online pharmacies, and retail pharmacies, revealing divergent fulfillment models, margin structures, and regulatory touchpoints that influence channel strategy and commercial investments. Based on end user, the market is studied across diagnostic centers, home care settings, and hospitals, which helps prioritize product design for ease of use, clinical oversight, and integration with existing workflows. Based on sample type, the market is studied across blood, nasopharyngeal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, and saliva, underlining how sample selection affects sensitivity, patient experience, and supply chain needs for collection materials. Based on application, the market is studied across clinical diagnosis, home testing, and research, which highlights distinct evidentiary requirements and commercialization paths; clinical diagnosis demands validated clinical performance, home testing emphasizes user instructions and disposal, and research applications prioritize flexibility and reagent-level transparency. Synthesizing these segment dimensions indicates where to invest in product differentiation, regulatory evidence, and channel enablement to match end-user priorities.
How regional regulatory diversity, manufacturing footprints, and healthcare delivery models across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific demand tailored commercialization and production strategies
Regional dynamics are central to understanding adoption patterns, regulatory pathways, and supply chain topology. In the Americas, healthcare systems vary from highly centralized to decentralized purchasing models, with large integrated health networks and robust private channels shaping procurement and rapid adoption of point-of-care solutions. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory heterogeneity and complex reimbursement landscapes require tailored market entry strategies and close engagement with regional regulatory advisors; supply chain diversity in this region also creates opportunities for regional manufacturing hubs that reduce lead times. In Asia-Pacific, manufacturing capability, regulatory modernization, and rapidly expanding point-of-care networks have combined to accelerate deployment, while diverse population health needs demand flexible product portfolios that address both centralized laboratory testing and decentralized screening programs. Taken together, these regional characteristics indicate that a one-size-fits-all approach will underperform, and that regionalized go-to-market models and local partnerships are essential for scaling presence and minimizing operational risk.
Competitive positioning pivots on validated performance, scalable manufacturing, and value-added services such as digital integration and supply resilience
Competitive dynamics are driven by firms that combine technical proficiency with scalable manufacturing, agile regulatory navigation, and channel reach. Organizations that emphasize quality systems, robust clinical validation, and post-market surveillance establish durable trust with clinicians and procurement agents. At the same time, companies that invest in modular manufacturing and flexible contract arrangements are able to respond to demand spikes and component shortages more effectively than those with rigid production lines. Strategic partnerships between diagnostic developers and distribution networks have become increasingly important to accelerate market access and to provide bundled services that include training, logistics, and data integration.
Moreover, differentiation increasingly rests on non-product capabilities such as digital reporting, data security, and interoperability with electronic health records. Companies that create seamless result transmission and analytics offerings can influence purchasing decisions in settings where public health reporting and institutional oversight are priorities. For smaller entrants, focusing on niche indications, specialized sample types, or novel user interfaces can create defensible positions without committing to broad manufacturing scale. Ultimately, the competitive landscape rewards operators that combine clinical credibility with operational resilience and customer-centric service models.
Actionable measures to secure supply chains, elevate clinical validation, and align distribution models for resilient market leadership in diagnostic testing
Industry leaders should prioritize strategic initiatives that enhance supply continuity, clinical credibility, and channel efficacy. First, investing in diversified sourcing and regional manufacturing capacity will reduce exposure to trade policy shifts and logistical disruptions while shortening time-to-delivery for key geographies. Second, strengthening clinical evidence through targeted validation studies and real-world evidence programs will build clinician trust and support institutional adoption, especially in hospital and diagnostic center settings. Third, optimizing distribution by aligning product formats with channel needs-making certain products pharmacy-friendly while ensuring laboratory-grade versions meet diagnostic center requirements-will improve market fit and commercial efficiency.
Furthermore, leaders should expand digital capabilities to streamline result reporting and to offer analytics that inform disease surveillance. In parallel, workforce and training investments are essential to ensure correct sample collection and test administration across settings, particularly for home testing and point-of-care deployments. Finally, scenario planning and flexible contracting will help organizations respond to policy shifts and demand variability without compromising service levels. These recommendations collectively enhance resilience, accelerate uptake, and protect margins in a rapidly evolving market.
A transparent mixed-methods approach combining primary interviews, operational observation, and regulatory document analysis to underpin evidence-based recommendations
This report’s findings are synthesized from a rigorous mixed-methods approach designed to ensure objectivity and relevance. Primary research included structured interviews with clinicians, laboratory directors, procurement officers, and industry executives, complemented by site visits to diagnostic laboratories and manufacturing facilities to observe operational realities. Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed literature, regulatory guidance documents, and publicly disclosed technical data to validate performance claims and to contextualize regulatory pathways.
Qualitative insights were triangulated with operational indicators gathered from supply chain partners and distribution networks. The methodology emphasized reproducibility and transparency: protocols for interview selection, data collection instruments, and criteria for technology classification were documented to enable consistent interpretation. Analytical techniques included cross-segmentation mapping and sensitivity analyses for risk factors, which helped identify strategic inflection points without relying on quantitative market sizing. Together, these methods provide a robust evidentiary base for the recommendations and conclusions presented herein.
Key takeaways emphasizing the necessity of aligning product capabilities, regional strategies, and operational resilience to achieve sustained impact in diagnostic testing
The evolving diagnostic environment demands that stakeholders balance technological innovation with operational rigor and regional nuance. Advances across antibody, PCR, and antigen modalities, coupled with shifts in regulatory pathways and trade policy, have elevated the importance of supply chain resilience and clinical evidence. Decision-makers who adapt by regionalizing manufacturing, investing in flexible distribution channels, and building data-enabled service offerings will be better positioned to meet clinician and patient expectations while managing risk.
As implementation becomes more decentralized, emphasis on sample collection standards, user training, and digital result integration will determine real-world effectiveness. Strategic engagement with regional regulatory authorities and channel partners will accelerate access and uptake. The overarching imperative is clear: align product capabilities with the operational realities of end users and regional systems to achieve sustainable impact and commercial success.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to current diagnostic modalities, operational realities, and strategic priorities shaping the coronavirus test kit environment for decision-makers
The global response to infectious disease testing continues to evolve rapidly, driven by advances in diagnostics, regulatory shifts, and changing patterns of healthcare utilization. This executive summary frames the current landscape of coronavirus test kits with a focus on practical implications for manufacturers, distributors, clinicians, and health system planners. It synthesizes core dynamics shaping demand, competitive behavior, and operational considerations while highlighting where strategic attention will yield the highest returns.
Beginning with a clear view of product modalities, distribution pathways, and end-user settings, the narrative connects technological capability with real-world implementation challenges. Throughout the sections that follow, the analysis links evidence on sensitivity, usability, and supply chain resilience to operational decisions such as portfolio rationalization, channel prioritization, and sample handling protocols. Ultimately, the introduction positions readers to interpret subsequent insights in a way that supports immediate action and medium-term planning.
How technological advances, regulatory agility, and supply chain resilience are reshaping diagnostic strategies, care pathways, and competitive positioning across the testing ecosystem
The testing landscape has undergone transformative shifts that extend beyond simple changes in demand volumes. Technological maturation has advanced the performance envelope of antigen, antibody, and nucleic acid assays, while parallel improvements in sample collection methods and point-of-care platforms have altered where and how testing is delivered. At the same time, regulatory frameworks have moved toward more agile pathways for emergency use and accelerated approvals, prompting manufacturers to design evidence packages that balance speed with clinical rigor.
Concurrently, supply chain resilience has become a strategic differentiator; firms that invest in diversified sourcing, regional manufacturing capabilities, and validated alternate suppliers are better positioned to withstand episodic disruptions. In addition, digital integration-ranging from electronic result reporting to telehealth-enabled test supervision-has transformed patient pathways and created new expectations for interoperability with electronic health records and public health surveillance systems. Together, these shifts require organizations to rethink product roadmaps, channel strategies, and value propositions in order to remain competitive and clinically relevant.
Understanding how 2025 tariff measures have reconfigured sourcing strategies, regional production incentives, and procurement priorities across diagnostic supply chains
Recent tariff policies implemented by the United States in 2025 have introduced new layers of cost and logistical complexity across global diagnostic supply chains. While tariffs are applied to specific imported goods, the downstream effects cascade through manufacturing inputs, contract manufacturing relationships, and distribution economics. Manufacturers that rely on cross-border component flows have faced increased unit costs and intermittent delays as sourcing strategies are reassessed and cost pass-through decisions are debated.
In response, several firms have accelerated near-shoring and regionalization efforts to mitigate exposure to tariff volatility and to secure continuity of supply. These strategic adjustments often involve capital reallocation to regional production lines, renegotiation of supplier contracts, and reassessment of product configurations to prioritize locally available components. For distributors and end users, the tariffs have heightened the importance of transparent supply chain documentation and contractual protections, with procurement teams emphasizing total landed cost analysis over unit price alone. Ultimately, the policy environment has shifted strategic attention from short-term price competition to longer-term supply resilience and contractual agility.
A multilayered segmentation framework clarifying product modalities, distribution dynamics, and end-user demands to guide product design and channel investment decisions
Insightful segmentation reveals which product types, channels, end-user settings, sample types, and applications are most influential in shaping commercial and clinical choices. Based on product type, the market is studied across Antibody, Polymerase Chain Reaction, and Rapid Antigen, with antibody methods further delineated into chemiluminescence immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay platforms, PCR approaches separated into isothermal amplification and real-time PCR formats, and rapid antigen diagnostics distinguished between fluorescent immunoassay and lateral flow immunoassay techniques; this layered view clarifies where performance, throughput, and operational footprint intersect with buyer preferences. Based on distribution channel, the market is studied across diagnostic laboratories, hospital pharmacy, online pharmacies, and retail pharmacies, revealing divergent fulfillment models, margin structures, and regulatory touchpoints that influence channel strategy and commercial investments. Based on end user, the market is studied across diagnostic centers, home care settings, and hospitals, which helps prioritize product design for ease of use, clinical oversight, and integration with existing workflows. Based on sample type, the market is studied across blood, nasopharyngeal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, and saliva, underlining how sample selection affects sensitivity, patient experience, and supply chain needs for collection materials. Based on application, the market is studied across clinical diagnosis, home testing, and research, which highlights distinct evidentiary requirements and commercialization paths; clinical diagnosis demands validated clinical performance, home testing emphasizes user instructions and disposal, and research applications prioritize flexibility and reagent-level transparency. Synthesizing these segment dimensions indicates where to invest in product differentiation, regulatory evidence, and channel enablement to match end-user priorities.
How regional regulatory diversity, manufacturing footprints, and healthcare delivery models across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific demand tailored commercialization and production strategies
Regional dynamics are central to understanding adoption patterns, regulatory pathways, and supply chain topology. In the Americas, healthcare systems vary from highly centralized to decentralized purchasing models, with large integrated health networks and robust private channels shaping procurement and rapid adoption of point-of-care solutions. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory heterogeneity and complex reimbursement landscapes require tailored market entry strategies and close engagement with regional regulatory advisors; supply chain diversity in this region also creates opportunities for regional manufacturing hubs that reduce lead times. In Asia-Pacific, manufacturing capability, regulatory modernization, and rapidly expanding point-of-care networks have combined to accelerate deployment, while diverse population health needs demand flexible product portfolios that address both centralized laboratory testing and decentralized screening programs. Taken together, these regional characteristics indicate that a one-size-fits-all approach will underperform, and that regionalized go-to-market models and local partnerships are essential for scaling presence and minimizing operational risk.
Competitive positioning pivots on validated performance, scalable manufacturing, and value-added services such as digital integration and supply resilience
Competitive dynamics are driven by firms that combine technical proficiency with scalable manufacturing, agile regulatory navigation, and channel reach. Organizations that emphasize quality systems, robust clinical validation, and post-market surveillance establish durable trust with clinicians and procurement agents. At the same time, companies that invest in modular manufacturing and flexible contract arrangements are able to respond to demand spikes and component shortages more effectively than those with rigid production lines. Strategic partnerships between diagnostic developers and distribution networks have become increasingly important to accelerate market access and to provide bundled services that include training, logistics, and data integration.
Moreover, differentiation increasingly rests on non-product capabilities such as digital reporting, data security, and interoperability with electronic health records. Companies that create seamless result transmission and analytics offerings can influence purchasing decisions in settings where public health reporting and institutional oversight are priorities. For smaller entrants, focusing on niche indications, specialized sample types, or novel user interfaces can create defensible positions without committing to broad manufacturing scale. Ultimately, the competitive landscape rewards operators that combine clinical credibility with operational resilience and customer-centric service models.
Actionable measures to secure supply chains, elevate clinical validation, and align distribution models for resilient market leadership in diagnostic testing
Industry leaders should prioritize strategic initiatives that enhance supply continuity, clinical credibility, and channel efficacy. First, investing in diversified sourcing and regional manufacturing capacity will reduce exposure to trade policy shifts and logistical disruptions while shortening time-to-delivery for key geographies. Second, strengthening clinical evidence through targeted validation studies and real-world evidence programs will build clinician trust and support institutional adoption, especially in hospital and diagnostic center settings. Third, optimizing distribution by aligning product formats with channel needs-making certain products pharmacy-friendly while ensuring laboratory-grade versions meet diagnostic center requirements-will improve market fit and commercial efficiency.
Furthermore, leaders should expand digital capabilities to streamline result reporting and to offer analytics that inform disease surveillance. In parallel, workforce and training investments are essential to ensure correct sample collection and test administration across settings, particularly for home testing and point-of-care deployments. Finally, scenario planning and flexible contracting will help organizations respond to policy shifts and demand variability without compromising service levels. These recommendations collectively enhance resilience, accelerate uptake, and protect margins in a rapidly evolving market.
A transparent mixed-methods approach combining primary interviews, operational observation, and regulatory document analysis to underpin evidence-based recommendations
This report’s findings are synthesized from a rigorous mixed-methods approach designed to ensure objectivity and relevance. Primary research included structured interviews with clinicians, laboratory directors, procurement officers, and industry executives, complemented by site visits to diagnostic laboratories and manufacturing facilities to observe operational realities. Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed literature, regulatory guidance documents, and publicly disclosed technical data to validate performance claims and to contextualize regulatory pathways.
Qualitative insights were triangulated with operational indicators gathered from supply chain partners and distribution networks. The methodology emphasized reproducibility and transparency: protocols for interview selection, data collection instruments, and criteria for technology classification were documented to enable consistent interpretation. Analytical techniques included cross-segmentation mapping and sensitivity analyses for risk factors, which helped identify strategic inflection points without relying on quantitative market sizing. Together, these methods provide a robust evidentiary base for the recommendations and conclusions presented herein.
Key takeaways emphasizing the necessity of aligning product capabilities, regional strategies, and operational resilience to achieve sustained impact in diagnostic testing
The evolving diagnostic environment demands that stakeholders balance technological innovation with operational rigor and regional nuance. Advances across antibody, PCR, and antigen modalities, coupled with shifts in regulatory pathways and trade policy, have elevated the importance of supply chain resilience and clinical evidence. Decision-makers who adapt by regionalizing manufacturing, investing in flexible distribution channels, and building data-enabled service offerings will be better positioned to meet clinician and patient expectations while managing risk.
As implementation becomes more decentralized, emphasis on sample collection standards, user training, and digital result integration will determine real-world effectiveness. Strategic engagement with regional regulatory authorities and channel partners will accelerate access and uptake. The overarching imperative is clear: align product capabilities with the operational realities of end users and regional systems to achieve sustainable impact and commercial success.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rapid at-home antigen test adoption driven by telehealth integration and user convenience
- 5.2. Emergence of multiplex PCR panels enabling simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants and respiratory pathogens for comprehensive diagnosis
- 5.3. Increasing regulatory approvals for combined COVID-19 and influenza test kits to streamline seasonal respiratory disease screening
- 5.4. Expansion of decentralized point-of-care molecular testing platforms with portable PCR devices for on-site results
- 5.5. Integration of smartphone-based AI analytics in antigen test readers for automated result interpretation and reporting
- 5.6. Growing demand for wastewater surveillance testing services as early outbreak warning systems in municipal settings
- 5.7. Shift towards environmental and surface testing solutions for continuous monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in public spaces
- 5.8. Development of CRISPR-based coronavirus diagnostics offering rapid, lab-quality sensitivity without the need for complex thermal cycling infrastructure
- 5.9. Adoption of saliva and other noninvasive self-collection methods to improve patient compliance and enable frequent population-level coronavirus screening
- 5.10. Expansion of corporate and institutional coronavirus screening programs as part of long-term occupational health and business continuity strategies
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Coronavirus Test Kits Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Antibody
- 8.1.1. Chemiluminescence Immunoassay
- 8.1.2. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
- 8.2. Polymerase Chain Reaction
- 8.2.1. Isothermal Amplification
- 8.2.2. Real-Time PCR
- 8.3. Rapid Antigen
- 8.3.1. Fluorescent Immunoassay
- 8.3.2. Lateral Flow Immunoassay
- 9. Coronavirus Test Kits Market, by Sample Type
- 9.1. Blood
- 9.2. Nasopharyngeal Swabs
- 9.3. Oropharyngeal Swabs
- 9.4. Saliva
- 10. Coronavirus Test Kits Market, by Application
- 10.1. Clinical Diagnosis
- 10.2. Home Testing
- 10.3. Research
- 11. Coronavirus Test Kits Market, by End User
- 11.1. Diagnostic Centers
- 11.2. Home Care Settings
- 11.3. Hospitals
- 12. Coronavirus Test Kits Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Diagnostic Laboratories
- 12.2. Hospital Pharmacy
- 12.3. Online Pharmacies
- 12.4. Retail Pharmacies
- 13. Coronavirus Test Kits Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Coronavirus Test Kits Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Coronavirus Test Kits Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. 1DROP Diagnostics
- 16.3.2. Abbott Laboratories
- 16.3.3. ADT Biotech Sdn Bhd
- 16.3.4. Aldatu Biosciences
- 16.3.5. altona Diagnostics GmbH
- 16.3.6. Avellino Lab USA, Inc.
- 16.3.7. bioMérieux SA
- 16.3.8. Co-Diagnostics, Inc.
- 16.3.9. Danaher Corporations
- 16.3.10. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc.
- 16.3.11. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
- 16.3.12. Curetis GmbH
- 16.3.13. Hologic, Inc.
- 16.3.14. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
- 16.3.15. Luminex Corporation
- 16.3.16. Mylab Discovery Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
- 16.3.17. Perkin Elmer, Inc.
- 16.3.18. Quidel Corporation
- 16.3.19. Randox Laboratories Ltd.
- 16.3.20. SD Biosensor, Inc.
- 16.3.21. Seegene, Inc.
- 16.3.22. Shenzhen Bioeasy Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.23. Siemens Healthineers AG
- 16.3.24. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 16.3.25. SolGent Co.,Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
