Converted Flexible Packaging Market by Material Type (Glass, Metal, Paper), Product Type (Bags, Cartons, Flexible Films), End Use Industry, Process Type, Barrier Level - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Converted Flexible Packaging Market was valued at USD 235.93 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 249.88 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.67%, reaching USD 395.71 billion by 2032.
A concise introduction to the evolving converted flexible packaging landscape driven by material innovation, regulatory pressures, and sustainability imperatives
The converted flexible packaging sector is experiencing a period of rapid redefinition as material innovation, consumer preferences, and regulatory pressures converge. At its core, the industry’s evolution is driven by manufacturers’ efforts to balance functionality with sustainability while maintaining cost efficiency and supply chain resilience. This introduction synthesizes the critical drivers shaping conversion practices, the operational complexities that continue to challenge producers, and the strategic imperatives for stakeholders across value chains.
As consumer demand for higher performance and more environmentally considerate packaging grows, converters are investing in new substrates and hybrid constructions that preserve product integrity while offering improved recyclability or reduced carbon intent. Concurrently, brands are prioritizing clarity in labeling and enhanced barrier performance that extend shelf life and minimize waste. These market realities are driving investments in process upgrades, cross-functional collaboration between material suppliers and brand owners, and progressive compliance planning to address evolving regulatory expectations.
Looking forward, successful players will be those that embed agility in procurement, maintain close alignment with downstream brand needs, and continuously evaluate process innovations that lower lifecycle impacts. By placing an operational emphasis on scalable technologies and transparent sourcing practices, converters can unlock differentiated value and respond effectively to accelerating sustainability mandates and shifting consumer expectations.
Transformative industry shifts reshaping material selection, production flexibility, and supply chain strategies across converted flexible packaging operations
The industry is undergoing transformative shifts that extend well beyond incremental product tweaks; these changes are systemic and multifaceted. One key shift is the reconfiguration of material hierarchies as brands and converters reassess the trade-offs between traditional substrates such as glass, metal, paper, and conventional plastics, and next-generation alternatives that promise lower environmental footprints or enhanced recyclability. This material rebalancing is prompting novel laminate architectures and a renewed focus on mono-material solutions that simplify end-of-life management.
Another important movement is the acceleration of digital and on-demand production models, which are altering order sizes, turnarounds, and inventory strategies. Digital printing and automated finishing processes are enabling shorter runs with variable designs while preserving cost efficiencies that previously required large production volumes. At the same time, regulatory and consumer scrutiny around recyclability and chemical safety is intensifying, forcing the adoption of cleaner coating chemistries, solvent alternatives, and barrier technologies that meet both performance and compliance thresholds.
Finally, supply chain strategies are being reimagined to emphasize nearshoring, strategic stocking points, and supplier partnerships that provide visibility and continuity. Taken together, these shifts suggest a trajectory where competitive advantage accrues to converters that can integrate material science, process flexibility, and robust supplier ecosystems into a coherent strategic framework.
Assessing the cumulative impact of recent United States tariff actions on input sourcing, supply chain design, and innovation timelines within converted packaging
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in recent policy cycles has introduced a new layer of strategic complexity for converters and brand owners operating in and with the United States. Tariff adjustments influence input costs, sourcing rationales, and the geographic logic of production footprints. In response, many stakeholders have revisited their supplier networks and procurement strategies to mitigate exposure and preserve margin integrity while maintaining product quality.
Beyond immediate cost effects, tariffs drive behavioral adaptations across the value chain. Suppliers in affected trade lanes explore alternative markets or localize production, which can lengthen qualification cycles but ultimately enhance resilience. Brands may shift product specifications to accommodate available materials or prioritize local suppliers to avoid tariff-induced variability. These responses often catalyze investments in dual-sourcing strategies, increased inventory buffers for critical substrates, and contractual protections that share tariff risk between buyers and suppliers.
Importantly, the cumulative effect of tariff policies extends to innovation timelines. When tariffs create uncertainty, capital allocation decisions for equipment upgrades, new substrate trials, and sustainability pilots can be delayed or reprioritized. Consequently, market participants planning significant change in the near term should model multiple policy scenarios, solidify supplier relationships that offer flexibility, and embed tariff contingency clauses into sourcing agreements to reduce execution risk.
Comprehensive segmentation insights connecting material subgroups, product variants, end-use categories, process specializations, and barrier performance to strategic priorities
A nuanced understanding of segmentation is essential to interpret competitive dynamics and prioritize investment opportunities. Material type segmentation highlights glass, metal, paper, and plastic as core substrate families, with metal dividing into aluminum and steel, paper separating into folding boxboard and kraft paper, and plastic encompassing PET, polyethylene, and polypropylene. These distinctions matter because each substrate family and subgroup drives different functional attributes, cost structures, and end-of-life pathways, which in turn shape converter choices and brand communications.
When considering product types, the landscape includes bags, cartons, flexible films, labels, and pouches, each with specialized variants such as barrier bags, carry and shopping bags; box and tuck end cartons; multi-layer and single-layer films; pressure sensitive and wrap-around labels; and flat, spouted, and stand-up pouches. Product selection directly influences required process capabilities, from lamination and extrusion platforms to finishing and printing technologies, and informs capital allocation decisions for converters seeking to broaden their service portfolios.
End-use segmentation across food and beverage, industrial, personal care, and pharmaceutical sectors-and further distinctions such as beverages, confectionery, dairy, snacks; automotive, chemicals, electronics; cosmetics, hair care, skin care; and injectable, oral, topical pharmaceuticals-clarifies demand drivers and regulatory obligations. Process-oriented segmentation into coating, extrusion, lamination, and printing, with deeper breakdowns like solvent-based, UV, and water-based coatings; blown and cast film extrusion; dry and wet lamination; and digital, flexography, gravure, and offset printing, underscores the capital intensity and skill specialization required. Finally, barrier-level segmentation into high, medium, and low barrier classes ties directly to product protection needs and influences material selection and processing complexity. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables stakeholders to pinpoint where technical differentiation, sustainability gains, or supply chain optimization will yield the greatest commercial return.
Regional dynamics and strategic implications across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that inform capability investments and market approaches
Regional dynamics exert strong influence on raw material access, regulatory regimes, consumer expectations, and logistics costs, which in turn shape strategic choices for converters and brand owners. In the Americas, proximity to large consumer markets, a mature retail ecosystem, and evolving sustainability legislation are driving demand for recyclable and lightweight packaging solutions as well as investments in nearshore capabilities to reduce exposure to international supply chain shocks.
Within Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, extended producer responsibility programs, and a heightened public focus on circularity are prompting accelerated adoption of mono-materials and certified recycling streams, while geographic diversity across the region necessitates differentiated go-to-market approaches. Industry actors operating here increasingly prioritize traceability, chemical compliance, and proof points around recycled content to meet both regulatory and retailer requirements.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, rising per-capita consumption, and dynamic manufacturing capabilities are fostering innovation in cost-effective, high-performance films and pouches. Localized supply chains and significant investment in extrusion and lamination capacity are creating competitive advantages, and manufacturers in the region are scaling advanced process automation and digital print solutions to serve both domestic and export markets. Taken together, these regional observations reveal where investments in capability, compliance, and customer engagement are most likely to unlock value.
Key company-level insights revealing how technical capability, sustainability leadership, and commercial agility shape competitive advantage in converted packaging
Competitive positioning within converted flexible packaging is increasingly defined by the interplay of technical capabilities, sustainability credentials, and go-to-market agility. Leading companies are differentiating through advanced process portfolios that include high-performance lamination, versatile extrusion platforms, and a range of printing technologies that support short runs and rapid SKU proliferation. These operational strengths allow converters to meet diverse brand specifications while maintaining responsiveness to changing consumer trends.
Sustainability leadership is a second axis of competition. Companies that have established clear pathways toward recyclable or reusable packaging, invested in solvent-free coatings or water-based chemistries, and engaged in verified recycled content sourcing are better positioned to win long-term partnerships with brand owners prioritizing circularity. In parallel, firms that offer integrated services-such as design-for-recyclability consultations, barrier optimization, and packaging life-cycle assessments-are capturing incremental value and strengthening customer retention.
Finally, commercial agility-manifested in flexible contract structures, localized service hubs, and data-driven customer insights-distinguishes high-performing suppliers. Firms that combine technical depth with consultative sales approaches and transparent supply chain practices tend to secure strategic, multi-year engagements with brand partners seeking to de-risk product launches and sustainability transitions.
Actionable recommendations for converting operations, investing in flexible capabilities, and strengthening supply chain resilience to sustain competitive differentiation
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of coordinated actions that align technological investments with commercial objectives and regulatory developments. First, convert operations toward mono-material constructions where feasible to simplify recycling streams and reduce end-of-life complexity, while retaining multi-layer solutions only for applications where barrier performance is non-negotiable. Aligning materials strategy with circularity goals will strengthen brand partnerships and future-proof product portfolios.
Second, invest in process modularity and digital finishing capabilities to serve increasing demand for shorter production runs and SKU variability. Upgrading to flexible extrusion platforms and expanding digital printing capacity will reduce lead times and enable premiumization through personalization and rapid design changes. Concurrently, adopt cleaner coating technologies and solvent alternatives to meet tightening chemical and recyclability standards and to reduce environmental compliance risks.
Third, enhance supply chain resilience through a combination of nearshoring, strategic dual sourcing, and tariff contingency planning. Strengthen supplier relationships with collaborative qualification processes and contractual mechanisms that share policy-driven cost volatility. Finally, develop consultative service offerings-such as design-for-recyclability workshops and barrier optimization studies-that position converters as strategic partners rather than commodity suppliers, thereby protecting margin and deepening customer engagement.
Research methodology detailing primary interviews, secondary evidence, and capability mapping employed to generate practical, validated insights for decision-makers
This analysis synthesizes qualitative benchmarking, supplier and brand interviews, operational capability assessments, and secondary industry research to ensure a robust, triangulated view of the converted flexible packaging landscape. Primary research included structured interviews with converters, brand procurement leads, and material suppliers to capture real-world responses to regulatory change, process innovation, and commercial pressures. These conversations informed the interpretation of technology adoption curves and commercial best practices.
Secondary research drew on industry publications, regulatory documentation, and trade association outputs to contextualize shifts in material policy, recycling infrastructure developments, and regional compliance regimes. Process capability mapping relied on site-level descriptions, vendor specifications, and technology roadmaps to determine the interplay between extrusion, lamination, coating, and printing investments. Throughout, the methodology emphasized cross-validation between primary feedback and documented industry trends to minimize bias and increase applicability across geographies and end-use segments.
Finally, the research prioritized actionable insight by focusing on operational levers, procurement adaptations, and design interventions that decision-makers can implement in the near to medium term. Limitations of the approach and opportunities for bespoke follow-up analyses are noted for readers seeking deeper, company-specific modeling or hands-on operational audits.
Conclusive synthesis of strategic priorities that combine material innovation, processing agility, and supply chain resilience to drive long-term competitive advantage
In conclusion, the converted flexible packaging sector stands at an inflection point where material innovation, process flexibility, regulatory evolution, and commercial strategy converge. Companies that proactively align substrate choices, invest in adaptable processing platforms, and integrate sustainability into product design will be better positioned to meet growing brand and consumer expectations. Moreover, firms that fortify their supply chains through localized capacity and intelligent sourcing will reduce exposure to policy and trade disruptions.
The path forward requires coordinated investments across technical, commercial, and organizational dimensions. By prioritizing mono-material solutions where appropriate, expanding digital and modular process capabilities, and embedding tariff-aware procurement strategies, stakeholders can both mitigate near-term risk and capture long-term value. Ultimately, the companies that translate these strategic priorities into executable roadmaps will lead in innovation, win premium partnerships, and secure durable competitive advantage in a rapidly evolving marketplace.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise introduction to the evolving converted flexible packaging landscape driven by material innovation, regulatory pressures, and sustainability imperatives
The converted flexible packaging sector is experiencing a period of rapid redefinition as material innovation, consumer preferences, and regulatory pressures converge. At its core, the industry’s evolution is driven by manufacturers’ efforts to balance functionality with sustainability while maintaining cost efficiency and supply chain resilience. This introduction synthesizes the critical drivers shaping conversion practices, the operational complexities that continue to challenge producers, and the strategic imperatives for stakeholders across value chains.
As consumer demand for higher performance and more environmentally considerate packaging grows, converters are investing in new substrates and hybrid constructions that preserve product integrity while offering improved recyclability or reduced carbon intent. Concurrently, brands are prioritizing clarity in labeling and enhanced barrier performance that extend shelf life and minimize waste. These market realities are driving investments in process upgrades, cross-functional collaboration between material suppliers and brand owners, and progressive compliance planning to address evolving regulatory expectations.
Looking forward, successful players will be those that embed agility in procurement, maintain close alignment with downstream brand needs, and continuously evaluate process innovations that lower lifecycle impacts. By placing an operational emphasis on scalable technologies and transparent sourcing practices, converters can unlock differentiated value and respond effectively to accelerating sustainability mandates and shifting consumer expectations.
Transformative industry shifts reshaping material selection, production flexibility, and supply chain strategies across converted flexible packaging operations
The industry is undergoing transformative shifts that extend well beyond incremental product tweaks; these changes are systemic and multifaceted. One key shift is the reconfiguration of material hierarchies as brands and converters reassess the trade-offs between traditional substrates such as glass, metal, paper, and conventional plastics, and next-generation alternatives that promise lower environmental footprints or enhanced recyclability. This material rebalancing is prompting novel laminate architectures and a renewed focus on mono-material solutions that simplify end-of-life management.
Another important movement is the acceleration of digital and on-demand production models, which are altering order sizes, turnarounds, and inventory strategies. Digital printing and automated finishing processes are enabling shorter runs with variable designs while preserving cost efficiencies that previously required large production volumes. At the same time, regulatory and consumer scrutiny around recyclability and chemical safety is intensifying, forcing the adoption of cleaner coating chemistries, solvent alternatives, and barrier technologies that meet both performance and compliance thresholds.
Finally, supply chain strategies are being reimagined to emphasize nearshoring, strategic stocking points, and supplier partnerships that provide visibility and continuity. Taken together, these shifts suggest a trajectory where competitive advantage accrues to converters that can integrate material science, process flexibility, and robust supplier ecosystems into a coherent strategic framework.
Assessing the cumulative impact of recent United States tariff actions on input sourcing, supply chain design, and innovation timelines within converted packaging
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in recent policy cycles has introduced a new layer of strategic complexity for converters and brand owners operating in and with the United States. Tariff adjustments influence input costs, sourcing rationales, and the geographic logic of production footprints. In response, many stakeholders have revisited their supplier networks and procurement strategies to mitigate exposure and preserve margin integrity while maintaining product quality.
Beyond immediate cost effects, tariffs drive behavioral adaptations across the value chain. Suppliers in affected trade lanes explore alternative markets or localize production, which can lengthen qualification cycles but ultimately enhance resilience. Brands may shift product specifications to accommodate available materials or prioritize local suppliers to avoid tariff-induced variability. These responses often catalyze investments in dual-sourcing strategies, increased inventory buffers for critical substrates, and contractual protections that share tariff risk between buyers and suppliers.
Importantly, the cumulative effect of tariff policies extends to innovation timelines. When tariffs create uncertainty, capital allocation decisions for equipment upgrades, new substrate trials, and sustainability pilots can be delayed or reprioritized. Consequently, market participants planning significant change in the near term should model multiple policy scenarios, solidify supplier relationships that offer flexibility, and embed tariff contingency clauses into sourcing agreements to reduce execution risk.
Comprehensive segmentation insights connecting material subgroups, product variants, end-use categories, process specializations, and barrier performance to strategic priorities
A nuanced understanding of segmentation is essential to interpret competitive dynamics and prioritize investment opportunities. Material type segmentation highlights glass, metal, paper, and plastic as core substrate families, with metal dividing into aluminum and steel, paper separating into folding boxboard and kraft paper, and plastic encompassing PET, polyethylene, and polypropylene. These distinctions matter because each substrate family and subgroup drives different functional attributes, cost structures, and end-of-life pathways, which in turn shape converter choices and brand communications.
When considering product types, the landscape includes bags, cartons, flexible films, labels, and pouches, each with specialized variants such as barrier bags, carry and shopping bags; box and tuck end cartons; multi-layer and single-layer films; pressure sensitive and wrap-around labels; and flat, spouted, and stand-up pouches. Product selection directly influences required process capabilities, from lamination and extrusion platforms to finishing and printing technologies, and informs capital allocation decisions for converters seeking to broaden their service portfolios.
End-use segmentation across food and beverage, industrial, personal care, and pharmaceutical sectors-and further distinctions such as beverages, confectionery, dairy, snacks; automotive, chemicals, electronics; cosmetics, hair care, skin care; and injectable, oral, topical pharmaceuticals-clarifies demand drivers and regulatory obligations. Process-oriented segmentation into coating, extrusion, lamination, and printing, with deeper breakdowns like solvent-based, UV, and water-based coatings; blown and cast film extrusion; dry and wet lamination; and digital, flexography, gravure, and offset printing, underscores the capital intensity and skill specialization required. Finally, barrier-level segmentation into high, medium, and low barrier classes ties directly to product protection needs and influences material selection and processing complexity. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables stakeholders to pinpoint where technical differentiation, sustainability gains, or supply chain optimization will yield the greatest commercial return.
Regional dynamics and strategic implications across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that inform capability investments and market approaches
Regional dynamics exert strong influence on raw material access, regulatory regimes, consumer expectations, and logistics costs, which in turn shape strategic choices for converters and brand owners. In the Americas, proximity to large consumer markets, a mature retail ecosystem, and evolving sustainability legislation are driving demand for recyclable and lightweight packaging solutions as well as investments in nearshore capabilities to reduce exposure to international supply chain shocks.
Within Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, extended producer responsibility programs, and a heightened public focus on circularity are prompting accelerated adoption of mono-materials and certified recycling streams, while geographic diversity across the region necessitates differentiated go-to-market approaches. Industry actors operating here increasingly prioritize traceability, chemical compliance, and proof points around recycled content to meet both regulatory and retailer requirements.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, rising per-capita consumption, and dynamic manufacturing capabilities are fostering innovation in cost-effective, high-performance films and pouches. Localized supply chains and significant investment in extrusion and lamination capacity are creating competitive advantages, and manufacturers in the region are scaling advanced process automation and digital print solutions to serve both domestic and export markets. Taken together, these regional observations reveal where investments in capability, compliance, and customer engagement are most likely to unlock value.
Key company-level insights revealing how technical capability, sustainability leadership, and commercial agility shape competitive advantage in converted packaging
Competitive positioning within converted flexible packaging is increasingly defined by the interplay of technical capabilities, sustainability credentials, and go-to-market agility. Leading companies are differentiating through advanced process portfolios that include high-performance lamination, versatile extrusion platforms, and a range of printing technologies that support short runs and rapid SKU proliferation. These operational strengths allow converters to meet diverse brand specifications while maintaining responsiveness to changing consumer trends.
Sustainability leadership is a second axis of competition. Companies that have established clear pathways toward recyclable or reusable packaging, invested in solvent-free coatings or water-based chemistries, and engaged in verified recycled content sourcing are better positioned to win long-term partnerships with brand owners prioritizing circularity. In parallel, firms that offer integrated services-such as design-for-recyclability consultations, barrier optimization, and packaging life-cycle assessments-are capturing incremental value and strengthening customer retention.
Finally, commercial agility-manifested in flexible contract structures, localized service hubs, and data-driven customer insights-distinguishes high-performing suppliers. Firms that combine technical depth with consultative sales approaches and transparent supply chain practices tend to secure strategic, multi-year engagements with brand partners seeking to de-risk product launches and sustainability transitions.
Actionable recommendations for converting operations, investing in flexible capabilities, and strengthening supply chain resilience to sustain competitive differentiation
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of coordinated actions that align technological investments with commercial objectives and regulatory developments. First, convert operations toward mono-material constructions where feasible to simplify recycling streams and reduce end-of-life complexity, while retaining multi-layer solutions only for applications where barrier performance is non-negotiable. Aligning materials strategy with circularity goals will strengthen brand partnerships and future-proof product portfolios.
Second, invest in process modularity and digital finishing capabilities to serve increasing demand for shorter production runs and SKU variability. Upgrading to flexible extrusion platforms and expanding digital printing capacity will reduce lead times and enable premiumization through personalization and rapid design changes. Concurrently, adopt cleaner coating technologies and solvent alternatives to meet tightening chemical and recyclability standards and to reduce environmental compliance risks.
Third, enhance supply chain resilience through a combination of nearshoring, strategic dual sourcing, and tariff contingency planning. Strengthen supplier relationships with collaborative qualification processes and contractual mechanisms that share policy-driven cost volatility. Finally, develop consultative service offerings-such as design-for-recyclability workshops and barrier optimization studies-that position converters as strategic partners rather than commodity suppliers, thereby protecting margin and deepening customer engagement.
Research methodology detailing primary interviews, secondary evidence, and capability mapping employed to generate practical, validated insights for decision-makers
This analysis synthesizes qualitative benchmarking, supplier and brand interviews, operational capability assessments, and secondary industry research to ensure a robust, triangulated view of the converted flexible packaging landscape. Primary research included structured interviews with converters, brand procurement leads, and material suppliers to capture real-world responses to regulatory change, process innovation, and commercial pressures. These conversations informed the interpretation of technology adoption curves and commercial best practices.
Secondary research drew on industry publications, regulatory documentation, and trade association outputs to contextualize shifts in material policy, recycling infrastructure developments, and regional compliance regimes. Process capability mapping relied on site-level descriptions, vendor specifications, and technology roadmaps to determine the interplay between extrusion, lamination, coating, and printing investments. Throughout, the methodology emphasized cross-validation between primary feedback and documented industry trends to minimize bias and increase applicability across geographies and end-use segments.
Finally, the research prioritized actionable insight by focusing on operational levers, procurement adaptations, and design interventions that decision-makers can implement in the near to medium term. Limitations of the approach and opportunities for bespoke follow-up analyses are noted for readers seeking deeper, company-specific modeling or hands-on operational audits.
Conclusive synthesis of strategic priorities that combine material innovation, processing agility, and supply chain resilience to drive long-term competitive advantage
In conclusion, the converted flexible packaging sector stands at an inflection point where material innovation, process flexibility, regulatory evolution, and commercial strategy converge. Companies that proactively align substrate choices, invest in adaptable processing platforms, and integrate sustainability into product design will be better positioned to meet growing brand and consumer expectations. Moreover, firms that fortify their supply chains through localized capacity and intelligent sourcing will reduce exposure to policy and trade disruptions.
The path forward requires coordinated investments across technical, commercial, and organizational dimensions. By prioritizing mono-material solutions where appropriate, expanding digital and modular process capabilities, and embedding tariff-aware procurement strategies, stakeholders can both mitigate near-term risk and capture long-term value. Ultimately, the companies that translate these strategic priorities into executable roadmaps will lead in innovation, win premium partnerships, and secure durable competitive advantage in a rapidly evolving marketplace.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
198 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Accelerated adoption of recyclable mono-layer polyethylene films in snack packaging markets
- 5.2. Integration of printed QR codes on flexible pouches for enhanced consumer engagement and tracking
- 5.3. Increasing demand for compostable barrier coatings in pet food flexible packaging to meet sustainability goals
- 5.4. Shift towards digital flexible packaging solutions with variable data printing for personalized promotions
- 5.5. Emergence of nanocomposite films improving oxygen and moisture barrier in beverage pouch applications
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Converted Flexible Packaging Market, by Material Type
- 8.1. Glass
- 8.2. Metal
- 8.2.1. Aluminum
- 8.2.2. Steel
- 8.3. Paper
- 8.3.1. Folding Boxboard
- 8.3.2. Kraft Paper
- 8.4. Plastic
- 8.4.1. Pet
- 8.4.2. Polyethylene
- 8.4.3. Polypropylene
- 9. Converted Flexible Packaging Market, by Product Type
- 9.1. Bags
- 9.1.1. Barrier Bags
- 9.1.2. Carry Bags
- 9.1.3. Shopping Bags
- 9.2. Cartons
- 9.2.1. Box Cartons
- 9.2.2. Tuck End Cartons
- 9.3. Flexible Films
- 9.4. Labels
- 9.5. Pouches
- 10. Converted Flexible Packaging Market, by End Use Industry
- 10.1. Food And Beverage
- 10.1.1. Beverages
- 10.1.2. Confectionery
- 10.1.3. Dairy
- 10.1.4. Snacks
- 10.2. Industrial
- 10.2.1. Automotive
- 10.2.2. Chemicals
- 10.2.3. Electronics
- 10.3. Personal Care
- 10.3.1. Cosmetics
- 10.3.2. Hair Care
- 10.3.3. Skin Care
- 10.4. Pharmaceutical
- 10.4.1. Injectable
- 10.4.2. Oral
- 10.4.3. Topical
- 11. Converted Flexible Packaging Market, by Process Type
- 11.1. Coating
- 11.1.1. Solvent Based
- 11.1.2. Uv
- 11.1.3. Water Based
- 11.2. Extrusion
- 11.2.1. Blown Film Extrusion
- 11.2.2. Cast Film Extrusion
- 11.3. Lamination
- 11.3.1. Dry Lamination
- 11.3.2. Wet Lamination
- 11.4. Printing
- 11.4.1. Digital
- 11.4.2. Flexography
- 11.4.3. Gravure
- 11.4.4. Offset
- 12. Converted Flexible Packaging Market, by Barrier Level
- 12.1. High Barrier
- 12.2. Low Barrier
- 12.3. Medium Barrier
- 13. Converted Flexible Packaging Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Converted Flexible Packaging Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Converted Flexible Packaging Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. ACTEGA GmbH
- 16.3.2. Aluflexpack AG
- 16.3.3. Amcor PLC
- 16.3.4. BBC CELLPACK Packaging Illfurth SAS
- 16.3.5. Berry Global Group, Inc.
- 16.3.6. C-P Flexible Packaging, Inc.
- 16.3.7. Clondalkin Group
- 16.3.8. Constantia Flexibles International GmbH
- 16.3.9. Coveris Management GmbH
- 16.3.10. Goglio S.p.A.
- 16.3.11. Graphic Packaging Holding Company
- 16.3.12. Hood Packaging Corporation
- 16.3.13. Huhtamäki Oyj
- 16.3.14. Microplast – Coldeplast
- 16.3.15. Mondi PLC
- 16.3.16. Pactiv Evergreen Inc.
- 16.3.17. PPC Flexible Packaging LLC
- 16.3.18. ProAmpac Intermediate, Inc.
- 16.3.19. Schur Flexibles Holding GesmbH
- 16.3.20. Sealed Air Corporation
- 16.3.21. Sonoco Products Company
- 16.3.22. Südpack Holding GmbH
- 16.3.23. UFlex Limited
- 16.3.24. WestRock Company
- 16.3.25. Wipak Group
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
