Containerboard Market by Product Type (Clay Coated Linerboard, Kraft Linerboard, Test Linerboard), Material (Mixed Containerboard, Recycled Containerboard, Virgin Containerboard), Board Grade, Basis Weight, End-Use Industry - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Containerboard Market was valued at USD 106.69 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 113.13 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.94%, reaching USD 182.25 billion by 2032.
Strategic introduction to containerboard market dynamics emphasizing supply chain pressures, shifting demand drivers, sustainability priorities and risks
The containerboard sector sits at the intersection of packaging demand, fiber economics and operational intensity, and this introduction frames the forces that are redefining competitive priorities across the value chain. Manufacturers, converters and brand owners are navigating a complex environment where supply chain friction, shifting consumer channels and heightened sustainability requirements converge. The immediate operational focus has moved from mere volume fulfillment to resilience planning, where raw material access, production flexibility and route-to-market capabilities determine commercial agility.
Taken together, these dynamics drive a reassessment of capital allocation, sourcing strategies and product portfolios. Stakeholders are moving from one-off tactical responses toward structured programs that emphasize circularity, traceability and process automation. At the same time, the interplay of regulatory signals and end-user expectations means that packaging performance must harmonize cost, recyclability and brand experience. This introduction establishes the foundational context for deeper analysis by anchoring subsequent sections in the real-world pressures that shape procurement decisions, capacity deployment and product innovation across the containerboard ecosystem.
Comprehensive analysis of transformative shifts reshaping containerboard value chains including automation, fiber circularity, digital ordering, and novel packaging formats
The landscape for containerboard is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological adoption, changing fiber economics and evolving customer requirements. Automation and digital ordering platforms are streamlining order-to-delivery cycles, enabling converters and distributors to shorten lead times and reduce inventory exposure. Simultaneously, investments in process control and asset modernization are improving yield and reducing variability, which in turn relieves pressure on tight fiber availability and drives more consistent product performance for downstream customers.
On the materials front, the shift toward fiber circularity is shaping procurement and design choices; increased uptake of recycled content and upgraded pulping technologies are redefining quality trade-offs and influencing product development. At the customer interface, e-commerce fulfillment continues to elevate demand for protective, lightweight and right-sized solutions, prompting experimentation with multi-layer constructions and innovative liner treatments. Regulatory expectations and brand sustainability commitments are accelerating adoption of traceability mechanisms and recycled content targets, prompting new supplier qualification standards and collaborative initiatives across the value chain. These shifts are not isolated; they interact to create systemic change in how value is delivered and captured in the containerboard market.
Assessment of cumulative impacts from United States tariff measures in 2025 on sourcing geographies, logistics flows, procurement strategies and supplier collaboration
United States tariff actions introduced in 2025 have created a cumulative impact across procurement, logistics and commercial strategies that merits careful operational diagnosis. Tariffs alter the effective cost of imported raw materials and finished goods, and their cumulative effect has prompted a re-evaluation of sourcing geographies and bilateral supplier relationships. Buyers with global sourcing footprints have responded by diversifying supply partners, increasing local sourcing where feasible, and recalibrating inventory buffers to absorb short-term cost volatility while preserving service levels for key customers.
Logistics patterns have adjusted as stakeholders seek to avoid tariff exposure through transshipment, inland sourcing or nearshoring. These adjustments produce secondary effects: shifts in lead times, changes in landed cost profiles and increased administrative complexity in customs compliance. Converters and brands are also revisiting contract terms and passing through partial cost increases in negotiated commercial agreements, while investing in design-to-cost initiatives that reduce material intensity. In aggregate, the 2025 tariff environment has reinforced the premium on supply chain visibility, contract flexibility and scenario planning, and it has accelerated collaboration among buyers, suppliers and logistics partners to mitigate cumulative financial and operational strain.
Actionable segmentation insights revealing how product types, material choices, board grades, basis weights and end-use industries shape demand dynamics, priorities
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated demand characteristics and operational implications across product, material, board grade, basis weight and end-use axes. Product types such as clay coated linerboard, kraft linerboard, test linerboard and waveline paper each carry distinct performance trade-offs that influence window-of-use, finishing processes and pricing dynamics; clay-coated surfaces support high-graphic applications while kraft variants prioritize strength under load. Material composition decisions between mixed containerboard, recycled containerboard and virgin containerboard control both input cost sensitivity and compliance profiles, with recycled-content systems demanding greater attention to variability management and sorting sophistication.
Board grade segmentation between multi-layer and single-layer constructions impacts converting throughput and adhesive or fluting choices, and basis weight differentiation across high basis weight and low basis weight segments drives packaging design decisions, shipping density and storage economics. End-use industry characteristics further shape adoption patterns: automotive customers emphasize dimensional stability and protection under vibration, e-commerce channels prioritize right-sizing and cushioning, electronics applications require electrostatic and moisture considerations, and food & beverage demand hygienic surfaces and regulatory traceability. Understanding how these segmentation layers intersect is essential for tailoring product portfolios, allocating capacity, and aligning commercial propositions to the nuanced requirements of each downstream sector.
Regional insights comparing Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific on logistics bottlenecks, shifting demand profiles, regulatory impact and supply resilience
Regional dynamics produce materially different operational and commercial imperatives across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific markets. In the Americas, integrated supply chains and proximity to large consumer markets create an emphasis on rapid replenishment, flexible mill schedules and service-oriented distribution networks; infrastructure investments and logistics optimization are central to maintaining cost competitiveness. Regulatory drivers and extended producer responsibility frameworks in Europe, Middle East & Africa add complexity to product specification and end-of-life considerations, prompting greater emphasis on recyclability, material traceability and cross-border compliance programs.
Asia-Pacific markets combine high-volume manufacturing capability with raw material sourcing advantages, yet they also present variability in sustainability standards and logistics complexity that require tailored supplier qualification and risk management. Across all regions, trade flows and energy cost baselines influence where capacity is expanded or curtailed, while regional customer preferences determine the pace of innovation adoption. Companies that adapt commercial models to regional nuances-balancing centralized standards with localized execution-achieve better alignment between supply capabilities and customer expectations, and reduce the friction that often accompanies cross-market expansion.
Company-level insights on strategic positioning, capacity allocation, sustainability actions, competitive responses and alliances driving market positions
Company-level dynamics reflect divergent strategic postures that influence competitive positioning across the containerboard value chain. Some manufacturers prioritize capacity optimization, deploying brownfield upgrades and process controls to improve yield and reduce variability, while others emphasize vertical integration or long-term supply agreements to secure fiber access. Converters and packaging specialists are differentiating through service models, value-added finishing and digital ordering capabilities that reduce time-to-market for their brand customers. Across the board, sustainability commitments are shaping capital allocation, with leaders investing in recycled-content technologies, water stewardship and energy efficiency to align with buyer expectations and regulatory trends.
Competitive responses also manifest in partnership models: alliances with logistics providers, joint ventures on fiber recovery and collaborative innovation programs with major brands are becoming common routes to mitigate risk and share the cost of transition. Corporate actions such as targeted M&A, selective divestitures and strategic capacity redeployment reflect an emphasis on portfolio rationalization and the pursuit of higher-margin niches. Understanding these company-level choices provides clarity on where consolidation, alliance formation and differentiated service propositions are likely to influence market structure and supplier selection criteria.
Targeted recommendations enabling industry leaders to enhance resilience via procurement agility, capacity efficiency, sustainability integration and alliances
Industry leaders should adopt a set of prioritized, actionable moves that increase resilience and capture emerging commercial value. First, strengthening procurement agility through multi-sourcing, flexible contracting and closer supplier collaboration reduces exposure to single-point disruptions and tariff volatility. Second, optimizing capacity utilization and investing selectively in yield-improving upgrades creates discretionary throughput that can be allocated to higher-value products or used to smooth supply shocks. Third, integrating sustainability into product design and supplier selection-by aligning recycled content goals with quality controls and end-of-life considerations-protects brand relationships and responds to regulatory expectations.
Leaders should also accelerate digital enablement across ordering, inventory visibility and demand-sensing to shorten lead times and drive better alignment between production and customer demand. Finally, pursuing collaborative commercial models such as co-development partnerships, pooled logistics or shared recovery programs can spread transition costs and unlock efficiencies across the value chain. Prioritizing these actions according to company capability and exposure will enable faster realization of operational benefits and reduce cost-to-serve over medium-term planning horizons.
Rigorous research methodology detailing primary and secondary sources, stakeholder interviews, supply-chain mapping, validation protocols and analytical tools
The research approach integrates a rigorous blend of primary engagement and secondary evidence, combining interviews with senior procurement, operations and commercial executives, structured supplier assessments, and detailed supply-chain mapping with comprehensive review of public filings and technical literature. Primary interviews provided context on decision drivers, risk tolerances and tactical responses, while supplier assessments clarified capability differences and quality control practices. Supply-chain mapping illuminated lead-time drivers, modal dependencies and single-source exposures that are critical to understanding where operational risk concentrates.
Data validation protocols included cross-referencing interview findings with documented asset configurations, production process descriptions, and observable shipping patterns to ensure internal consistency. Analytical tools applied ranged from scenario sensitivity checks to qualitative coding of strategic themes, enabling a coherent synthesis of operational priorities and commercial implications. Together, these methods form a transparent foundation for the conclusions and recommendations presented in this executive summary.
Concluding synthesis presenting strategic actions for industry participants to fortify supply resilience, advance sustainability and respond to evolving policy
The concluding synthesis crystallizes the strategic imperatives that industry participants must address to remain competitive and resilient in a changing environment. Emphasis on supply resilience requires focused investments in sourcing diversification and process reliability, while sustainability goals demand material innovation and tighter controls on recycled content quality. Regulatory and policy shifts add a layer of complexity that benefits from proactive engagement with trade bodies and collaborative industry initiatives to shape practical, implementable standards.
Taken together, the analysis highlights the need for integrated strategies that combine operational improvements, targeted capital deployment and stronger commercial partnerships. Companies that align product portfolios to segmentation realities, adopt digital tools for demand alignment, and pursue pragmatic sustainability investments will be better positioned to manage volatility and capture differentiated value. This synthesis underlines that purposeful, coordinated action across procurement, operations and commercial teams is the most reliable pathway to durable competitive advantage in the containerboard arena.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Strategic introduction to containerboard market dynamics emphasizing supply chain pressures, shifting demand drivers, sustainability priorities and risks
The containerboard sector sits at the intersection of packaging demand, fiber economics and operational intensity, and this introduction frames the forces that are redefining competitive priorities across the value chain. Manufacturers, converters and brand owners are navigating a complex environment where supply chain friction, shifting consumer channels and heightened sustainability requirements converge. The immediate operational focus has moved from mere volume fulfillment to resilience planning, where raw material access, production flexibility and route-to-market capabilities determine commercial agility.
Taken together, these dynamics drive a reassessment of capital allocation, sourcing strategies and product portfolios. Stakeholders are moving from one-off tactical responses toward structured programs that emphasize circularity, traceability and process automation. At the same time, the interplay of regulatory signals and end-user expectations means that packaging performance must harmonize cost, recyclability and brand experience. This introduction establishes the foundational context for deeper analysis by anchoring subsequent sections in the real-world pressures that shape procurement decisions, capacity deployment and product innovation across the containerboard ecosystem.
Comprehensive analysis of transformative shifts reshaping containerboard value chains including automation, fiber circularity, digital ordering, and novel packaging formats
The landscape for containerboard is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological adoption, changing fiber economics and evolving customer requirements. Automation and digital ordering platforms are streamlining order-to-delivery cycles, enabling converters and distributors to shorten lead times and reduce inventory exposure. Simultaneously, investments in process control and asset modernization are improving yield and reducing variability, which in turn relieves pressure on tight fiber availability and drives more consistent product performance for downstream customers.
On the materials front, the shift toward fiber circularity is shaping procurement and design choices; increased uptake of recycled content and upgraded pulping technologies are redefining quality trade-offs and influencing product development. At the customer interface, e-commerce fulfillment continues to elevate demand for protective, lightweight and right-sized solutions, prompting experimentation with multi-layer constructions and innovative liner treatments. Regulatory expectations and brand sustainability commitments are accelerating adoption of traceability mechanisms and recycled content targets, prompting new supplier qualification standards and collaborative initiatives across the value chain. These shifts are not isolated; they interact to create systemic change in how value is delivered and captured in the containerboard market.
Assessment of cumulative impacts from United States tariff measures in 2025 on sourcing geographies, logistics flows, procurement strategies and supplier collaboration
United States tariff actions introduced in 2025 have created a cumulative impact across procurement, logistics and commercial strategies that merits careful operational diagnosis. Tariffs alter the effective cost of imported raw materials and finished goods, and their cumulative effect has prompted a re-evaluation of sourcing geographies and bilateral supplier relationships. Buyers with global sourcing footprints have responded by diversifying supply partners, increasing local sourcing where feasible, and recalibrating inventory buffers to absorb short-term cost volatility while preserving service levels for key customers.
Logistics patterns have adjusted as stakeholders seek to avoid tariff exposure through transshipment, inland sourcing or nearshoring. These adjustments produce secondary effects: shifts in lead times, changes in landed cost profiles and increased administrative complexity in customs compliance. Converters and brands are also revisiting contract terms and passing through partial cost increases in negotiated commercial agreements, while investing in design-to-cost initiatives that reduce material intensity. In aggregate, the 2025 tariff environment has reinforced the premium on supply chain visibility, contract flexibility and scenario planning, and it has accelerated collaboration among buyers, suppliers and logistics partners to mitigate cumulative financial and operational strain.
Actionable segmentation insights revealing how product types, material choices, board grades, basis weights and end-use industries shape demand dynamics, priorities
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated demand characteristics and operational implications across product, material, board grade, basis weight and end-use axes. Product types such as clay coated linerboard, kraft linerboard, test linerboard and waveline paper each carry distinct performance trade-offs that influence window-of-use, finishing processes and pricing dynamics; clay-coated surfaces support high-graphic applications while kraft variants prioritize strength under load. Material composition decisions between mixed containerboard, recycled containerboard and virgin containerboard control both input cost sensitivity and compliance profiles, with recycled-content systems demanding greater attention to variability management and sorting sophistication.
Board grade segmentation between multi-layer and single-layer constructions impacts converting throughput and adhesive or fluting choices, and basis weight differentiation across high basis weight and low basis weight segments drives packaging design decisions, shipping density and storage economics. End-use industry characteristics further shape adoption patterns: automotive customers emphasize dimensional stability and protection under vibration, e-commerce channels prioritize right-sizing and cushioning, electronics applications require electrostatic and moisture considerations, and food & beverage demand hygienic surfaces and regulatory traceability. Understanding how these segmentation layers intersect is essential for tailoring product portfolios, allocating capacity, and aligning commercial propositions to the nuanced requirements of each downstream sector.
Regional insights comparing Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific on logistics bottlenecks, shifting demand profiles, regulatory impact and supply resilience
Regional dynamics produce materially different operational and commercial imperatives across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific markets. In the Americas, integrated supply chains and proximity to large consumer markets create an emphasis on rapid replenishment, flexible mill schedules and service-oriented distribution networks; infrastructure investments and logistics optimization are central to maintaining cost competitiveness. Regulatory drivers and extended producer responsibility frameworks in Europe, Middle East & Africa add complexity to product specification and end-of-life considerations, prompting greater emphasis on recyclability, material traceability and cross-border compliance programs.
Asia-Pacific markets combine high-volume manufacturing capability with raw material sourcing advantages, yet they also present variability in sustainability standards and logistics complexity that require tailored supplier qualification and risk management. Across all regions, trade flows and energy cost baselines influence where capacity is expanded or curtailed, while regional customer preferences determine the pace of innovation adoption. Companies that adapt commercial models to regional nuances-balancing centralized standards with localized execution-achieve better alignment between supply capabilities and customer expectations, and reduce the friction that often accompanies cross-market expansion.
Company-level insights on strategic positioning, capacity allocation, sustainability actions, competitive responses and alliances driving market positions
Company-level dynamics reflect divergent strategic postures that influence competitive positioning across the containerboard value chain. Some manufacturers prioritize capacity optimization, deploying brownfield upgrades and process controls to improve yield and reduce variability, while others emphasize vertical integration or long-term supply agreements to secure fiber access. Converters and packaging specialists are differentiating through service models, value-added finishing and digital ordering capabilities that reduce time-to-market for their brand customers. Across the board, sustainability commitments are shaping capital allocation, with leaders investing in recycled-content technologies, water stewardship and energy efficiency to align with buyer expectations and regulatory trends.
Competitive responses also manifest in partnership models: alliances with logistics providers, joint ventures on fiber recovery and collaborative innovation programs with major brands are becoming common routes to mitigate risk and share the cost of transition. Corporate actions such as targeted M&A, selective divestitures and strategic capacity redeployment reflect an emphasis on portfolio rationalization and the pursuit of higher-margin niches. Understanding these company-level choices provides clarity on where consolidation, alliance formation and differentiated service propositions are likely to influence market structure and supplier selection criteria.
Targeted recommendations enabling industry leaders to enhance resilience via procurement agility, capacity efficiency, sustainability integration and alliances
Industry leaders should adopt a set of prioritized, actionable moves that increase resilience and capture emerging commercial value. First, strengthening procurement agility through multi-sourcing, flexible contracting and closer supplier collaboration reduces exposure to single-point disruptions and tariff volatility. Second, optimizing capacity utilization and investing selectively in yield-improving upgrades creates discretionary throughput that can be allocated to higher-value products or used to smooth supply shocks. Third, integrating sustainability into product design and supplier selection-by aligning recycled content goals with quality controls and end-of-life considerations-protects brand relationships and responds to regulatory expectations.
Leaders should also accelerate digital enablement across ordering, inventory visibility and demand-sensing to shorten lead times and drive better alignment between production and customer demand. Finally, pursuing collaborative commercial models such as co-development partnerships, pooled logistics or shared recovery programs can spread transition costs and unlock efficiencies across the value chain. Prioritizing these actions according to company capability and exposure will enable faster realization of operational benefits and reduce cost-to-serve over medium-term planning horizons.
Rigorous research methodology detailing primary and secondary sources, stakeholder interviews, supply-chain mapping, validation protocols and analytical tools
The research approach integrates a rigorous blend of primary engagement and secondary evidence, combining interviews with senior procurement, operations and commercial executives, structured supplier assessments, and detailed supply-chain mapping with comprehensive review of public filings and technical literature. Primary interviews provided context on decision drivers, risk tolerances and tactical responses, while supplier assessments clarified capability differences and quality control practices. Supply-chain mapping illuminated lead-time drivers, modal dependencies and single-source exposures that are critical to understanding where operational risk concentrates.
Data validation protocols included cross-referencing interview findings with documented asset configurations, production process descriptions, and observable shipping patterns to ensure internal consistency. Analytical tools applied ranged from scenario sensitivity checks to qualitative coding of strategic themes, enabling a coherent synthesis of operational priorities and commercial implications. Together, these methods form a transparent foundation for the conclusions and recommendations presented in this executive summary.
Concluding synthesis presenting strategic actions for industry participants to fortify supply resilience, advance sustainability and respond to evolving policy
The concluding synthesis crystallizes the strategic imperatives that industry participants must address to remain competitive and resilient in a changing environment. Emphasis on supply resilience requires focused investments in sourcing diversification and process reliability, while sustainability goals demand material innovation and tighter controls on recycled content quality. Regulatory and policy shifts add a layer of complexity that benefits from proactive engagement with trade bodies and collaborative industry initiatives to shape practical, implementable standards.
Taken together, the analysis highlights the need for integrated strategies that combine operational improvements, targeted capital deployment and stronger commercial partnerships. Companies that align product portfolios to segmentation realities, adopt digital tools for demand alignment, and pursue pragmatic sustainability investments will be better positioned to manage volatility and capture differentiated value. This synthesis underlines that purposeful, coordinated action across procurement, operations and commercial teams is the most reliable pathway to durable competitive advantage in the containerboard arena.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Containerboard Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Clay Coated Linerboard
- 8.2. Kraft Linerboard
- 8.3. Test Linerboard
- 8.4. Waveline Paper
- 9. Containerboard Market, by Material
- 9.1. Mixed Containerboard
- 9.2. Recycled Containerboard
- 9.3. Virgin Containerboard
- 10. Containerboard Market, by Board Grade
- 10.1. Multi-Layer
- 10.2. Single-Layer
- 11. Containerboard Market, by Basis Weight
- 11.1. High Basis Weight
- 11.2. Low Basis Weight
- 12. Containerboard Market, by End-Use Industry
- 12.1. Automotive
- 12.2. E-Commerce
- 12.3. Electronics
- 12.4. Food & Beverage
- 13. Containerboard Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Containerboard Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Containerboard Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. United States Containerboard Market
- 17. China Containerboard Market
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 18.5. Astron Paper & Board Mill Limited
- 18.6. Canfor Corporation
- 18.7. Cascades Inc.
- 18.8. Cheng Loong Corporation
- 18.9. DS Smith Plc
- 18.10. European Packaging Team
- 18.11. Georgia-Pacific LLC
- 18.12. Graphic Packaging International, LLC
- 18.13. Green Bay Packaging Inc.
- 18.14. Hamburger Containerboard
- 18.15. Hood Container Corporation
- 18.16. Klabin S.A.
- 18.17. Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
- 18.18. Metro Paper Industries Inc.
- 18.19. Metsa Board Corporation
- 18.20. Mondi Group
- 18.21. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.
- 18.22. Packaging Corporation of America
- 18.23. PaperWorks Industries, Inc.
- 18.24. Rengo Co., Ltd.
- 18.25. Saica Group
- 18.26. Smurfit Westrock PLC
- 18.27. Sonoco Products Company
- 18.28. UPM-Kymmene Corporation
- 18.29. Victory Packaging
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
