Container Leasing Market by Container Type (Dry Container, Reefer Container, Tank Container), Lease Duration (Long Term, Short Term), Lease Model, End User, Contract Type - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Container Leasing Market was valued at USD 5.33 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 5.61 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.37%, reaching USD 8.10 billion by 2032.
A concise introduction framing the strategic crossroads of container leasing driven by trade dynamics, asset optimization and contractual innovation
This executive introduction frames the complex and rapidly evolving container leasing environment, emphasizing the strategic choices facing asset owners, lessors, and end users. The sector now sits at the intersection of shifting global trade flows, capital markets dynamics, and technological advances in asset tracking and condition monitoring, all of which influence leasing terms, fleet composition, and residual value expectations. Decision-makers must weigh operational flexibility against capital efficiency while navigating regulatory and tariff-related headwinds that affect cross-border cargo economics.
Within this context, the leasing community has moved beyond simple capacity provisioning to offer differentiated services that embed risk management, maintenance, and digital traceability into lease agreements. Lessees increasingly demand tailored solutions that align with temperature-controlled supply chains, short-haul modal shifts, and just-in-time inventory strategies. Consequently, lessors refine their product mix and contract structures to capture new revenue streams while preserving asset utilization. The introduction concludes by underscoring the need for integrated intelligence that connects container type, lease duration, contractual model, and end-user requirements to support resilient fleet planning and commercially sustainable lease portfolios.
How technological advances, sustainability imperatives and customer-centric contract design are reshaping the global container leasing landscape
The landscape for container leasing has undergone transformative shifts shaped by technology adoption, sustainability priorities, and evolving customer expectations. Electrification of port equipment and investments in cold-chain infrastructure have elevated the strategic importance of reefer containers, particularly multi-temperature configurations that support complex, perishable supply chains. Simultaneously, digital platforms that enable real-time condition monitoring, predictive maintenance, and automated billing have reduced operational friction and created opportunities for usage-based and outcome-oriented leasing models.
These technological changes coincide with an increased emphasis on environmental performance, prompting lessors and lessees to consider lifecycle emissions and end-of-life recycling when selecting container types and lease tenors. The capital markets response to environmental, social, and governance criteria has also influenced funding costs and investor appetite for container assets, encouraging firms to design contracts that transfer certain sustainability risks and rewards. As a result, industry participants who integrate digital capabilities with sustainability commitments and flexible contract terms position themselves to capture value from both operational efficiency gains and differentiated client propositions.
Comprehensive analysis of how 2025 tariff adjustments by the United States reshaped trade flows, repositioning costs and leasing preferences across the supply chain
An assessment of the cumulative impact of United States tariff changes introduced in 2025 reveals multifaceted effects spanning cost structures, routing decisions, and leasing demand patterns. Elevated duties and adjusted trade barriers have increased landed import costs for a range of commodities, prompting shippers and freight forwarders to revisit sourcing strategies and modal choices. In response, some supply chains shortened or shifted to lower-duty jurisdictions, reducing transit distances and altering container flows on key east-west lanes. These route adjustments affected container repositioning cycles and created localized variations in container availability, with knock-on consequences for utilization and short-term lease demand.
Tariff-related cost pressures also encouraged cargo owners to prioritize flexibility in working capital and asset commitments. Longer-term commitments became less attractive for businesses facing unpredictable duty regimes, while short-term or adaptive lease structures grew in appeal for companies seeking to hedge against policy volatility. For reefer operators handling high-value perishables, tariff-induced margin compression led to tighter cost control and greater collaboration with lessors on service level agreements that protect cold chain integrity. Across the board, financiers and lessors reassessed residual value risk assumptions, adjusting underwriting criteria to reflect the increased likelihood of route reconfiguration and commodity substitution driven by tariff dynamics.
Segmentation-driven insights explaining how container type, lease duration, model, end-user profile and contract structure determine value and risk allocation
Key segmentation insights reveal how container type, lease duration, lease model, end user and contract type converge to define differentiated commercial outcomes and operational risk profiles. When examining container type, distinct demand patterns emerge among dry containers, reefer containers and tank containers; reefer demand further bifurcates between multi-temperature and single-temperature requirements, with multi-temperature units increasingly preferred by complex perishable logistics that require simultaneous cold chain zones. Lease duration segmentation highlights divergent operational imperatives: long-term tenors, broken into more than five years and intermediate bands of one to three years and three to five years, serve core fleet planning and capital efficiency objectives, whereas short-term arrangements, spanning less than three months, three to six months, and six to twelve months, deliver tactical capacity and seasonal flexibility.
Within lease model segmentation, finance leases including capital leases and sale-and-lease-back structures appeal to lessees seeking balance sheet ownership or working capital relief, while operating leases, encompassing direct leases and synthetic lease constructs, support off-balance-sheet flexibility and service-oriented propositions. End-user segmentation shows differentiated needs among freight forwarders, logistics companies and shipping lines, each of which values different combinations of asset control, maintenance support and contractual duration. Contract type segmentation separates fixed-rate arrangements-single rate or tiered rate- from floating-rate structures indexed to benchmarks such as LIBOR or SOFR, with each structure influencing cashflow predictability and interest rate exposure for both lessor and lessee. Understanding these interdependencies enables stakeholders to tailor product offerings and risk transfer mechanisms to specific customer profiles and operational rhythms.
Regional dynamics and infrastructure realities that influence container leasing strategies across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics display pronounced differences in demand drivers, regulatory environments and infrastructure maturity that materially affect leasing strategies across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, trade flows oriented to intra-regional supply chains and nearshoring trends stimulate demand for short-term and flexible leasing solutions, particularly for dry containers supporting manufacturing hubs and reefer units servicing agricultural exports. Port congestion mitigation and inland freight connectivity investments in several countries influence repositioning costs and the attractiveness of localized fleet basing strategies.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex mosaic of high regulatory oversight, environmental targets, and well-developed cold-chain networks that drive interest in higher-specification reefers and longer-term leasing arrangements backed by service packages. In contrast, Asia-Pacific remains the largest source and receiver of containerized trade and demonstrates strong demand for both long-term fleet commitments and agile short-term leasing to accommodate seasonal peaks and rapid growth corridors. Across regions, infrastructure investments, tariff regimes, and trade agreements shape strategic decisions around where to base fleets, how to structure multi-jurisdictional leases, and which contract types best balance predictability and flexibility.
How leading lessors and specialist operators differentiate through fleet focus, partnerships, and digital operational excellence to secure durable competitive advantage
A review of key company-level trends highlights how leading lessors, asset managers and specialist operators differentiate through fleet composition, service bundling and capital structuring. Market participants increasingly pursue strategic partnerships with maintenance providers, technology firms, and port operators to enhance asset uptime and provide integrated logistics solutions. Some firms adopt targeted fleet segmentation strategies, concentrating on reefers for temperature-sensitive supply chains while others focus on tank containers for chemical and bulk liquid logistics, thereby aligning operational capabilities with sectoral end-user needs.
At the corporate level, several trajectories stand out: alliances that secure long-term cargo volumes through contractual commitments, financing innovations that optimize balance sheet treatment and liquidity, and investment in telematics and predictive maintenance to substantively reduce downtime and unplanned repair costs. Competitive differentiation now rests on the ability to deliver contract flexibility, transparent pricing and value-added services that reduce total landed cost for lessees. Companies that embed digital performance metrics and clear service-level agreements into their lease propositions tend to achieve superior client retention and higher utilization rates over time.
Practical strategic actions to build portfolio resilience, enhance contractual flexibility and monetize digital and sustainability capabilities across leasing operations
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders emphasize strategic moves that balance resilience, customer-centricity, and financial discipline. First, lessors should prioritize modular lease design that permits rapid transition between short-term and long-term commitments without excessive administrative burden, enabling responsiveness to tariff shifts, seasonal demand, and route changes. Second, integrating predictive maintenance and telematics into standard contracts reduces downtime and improves transparency; firms should adopt common data standards to facilitate interoperability with customers and port systems. Third, align fleet investment with sustainability goals by selecting materials and end-of-life pathways that minimize lifecycle emissions and by offering green lease options that pass through incentives or credits to lessees.
Leaders must also refine risk underwriting by stress-testing residual value and repositioning costs under multiple trade-policy scenarios, and they should diversify funding sources to smooth capital cost volatility. Strengthen go-to-market approaches by bundling value-added services-such as maintenance, insurance overlays, and logistics coordination-into tiered product offerings that match specific end-user profiles. Finally, cultivate collaborative relationships with freight forwarders, logistics companies and shipping lines to co-design solutions that reduce total supply chain cost and increase asset utilization, thereby creating durable, mutually beneficial commercial arrangements.
A rigorous mixed-methods approach describing the primary and secondary research processes, validation steps and analytical techniques used to derive findings
The research methodology combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robust, verifiable insights and transparent analytical logic. Primary research comprises structured interviews and workshops with a cross-section of industry stakeholders, including lessors, logistics providers, freight forwarders, shipping lines and maintenance specialists, to capture operational realities, contract preferences, and contemporary risk perceptions. Secondary research involved the systematic review of public financial disclosures, trade flow datasets, port throughput statistics and industry publications to corroborate themes identified during interviews and to map structural drivers at the intersection of demand and asset management.
Analytical procedures included segmentation mapping to align container types, lease durations, lease models, contract structures and end-user behaviors, supplemented by sensitivity analysis to examine the effects of tariff shifts, route reconfigurations and interest rate variations on utilization and residual risk. Validation rounds with industry practitioners refined assumptions and interpretations. The methodology emphasizes reproducibility, and appendices document data sources, interview frameworks, and definitions used to ensure that conclusions follow logically from the underlying evidence base.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the imperative for agility, contractual innovation and digital-enabled service models to secure sustainable competitive advantage
In conclusion, the container leasing sector stands at a strategic inflection point where operational agility, contractual innovation, and digital-enabled service delivery determine competitive success. The interplay of container type specialization, tailored lease durations, and adaptable contract models allows lessors and lessees to manage risk while capturing new commercial opportunities. Tariff developments and regional infrastructure variations continue to influence routing and repositioning costs, reinforcing the need for scenario planning and flexible asset deployment.
Companies that invest in predictive maintenance, interoperable data platforms and sustainability-aligned fleet choices will improve utilization and client retention. Simultaneously, those that diversify funding structures and refine underwriting to reflect policy and trade volatility will better manage residual value exposure. The combined effect is a marketplace where differentiated service offerings, close customer collaboration and disciplined capital management create durable advantages. Stakeholders that act decisively on these priorities will be best positioned to convert market complexity into profitable, resilient growth trajectories.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise introduction framing the strategic crossroads of container leasing driven by trade dynamics, asset optimization and contractual innovation
This executive introduction frames the complex and rapidly evolving container leasing environment, emphasizing the strategic choices facing asset owners, lessors, and end users. The sector now sits at the intersection of shifting global trade flows, capital markets dynamics, and technological advances in asset tracking and condition monitoring, all of which influence leasing terms, fleet composition, and residual value expectations. Decision-makers must weigh operational flexibility against capital efficiency while navigating regulatory and tariff-related headwinds that affect cross-border cargo economics.
Within this context, the leasing community has moved beyond simple capacity provisioning to offer differentiated services that embed risk management, maintenance, and digital traceability into lease agreements. Lessees increasingly demand tailored solutions that align with temperature-controlled supply chains, short-haul modal shifts, and just-in-time inventory strategies. Consequently, lessors refine their product mix and contract structures to capture new revenue streams while preserving asset utilization. The introduction concludes by underscoring the need for integrated intelligence that connects container type, lease duration, contractual model, and end-user requirements to support resilient fleet planning and commercially sustainable lease portfolios.
How technological advances, sustainability imperatives and customer-centric contract design are reshaping the global container leasing landscape
The landscape for container leasing has undergone transformative shifts shaped by technology adoption, sustainability priorities, and evolving customer expectations. Electrification of port equipment and investments in cold-chain infrastructure have elevated the strategic importance of reefer containers, particularly multi-temperature configurations that support complex, perishable supply chains. Simultaneously, digital platforms that enable real-time condition monitoring, predictive maintenance, and automated billing have reduced operational friction and created opportunities for usage-based and outcome-oriented leasing models.
These technological changes coincide with an increased emphasis on environmental performance, prompting lessors and lessees to consider lifecycle emissions and end-of-life recycling when selecting container types and lease tenors. The capital markets response to environmental, social, and governance criteria has also influenced funding costs and investor appetite for container assets, encouraging firms to design contracts that transfer certain sustainability risks and rewards. As a result, industry participants who integrate digital capabilities with sustainability commitments and flexible contract terms position themselves to capture value from both operational efficiency gains and differentiated client propositions.
Comprehensive analysis of how 2025 tariff adjustments by the United States reshaped trade flows, repositioning costs and leasing preferences across the supply chain
An assessment of the cumulative impact of United States tariff changes introduced in 2025 reveals multifaceted effects spanning cost structures, routing decisions, and leasing demand patterns. Elevated duties and adjusted trade barriers have increased landed import costs for a range of commodities, prompting shippers and freight forwarders to revisit sourcing strategies and modal choices. In response, some supply chains shortened or shifted to lower-duty jurisdictions, reducing transit distances and altering container flows on key east-west lanes. These route adjustments affected container repositioning cycles and created localized variations in container availability, with knock-on consequences for utilization and short-term lease demand.
Tariff-related cost pressures also encouraged cargo owners to prioritize flexibility in working capital and asset commitments. Longer-term commitments became less attractive for businesses facing unpredictable duty regimes, while short-term or adaptive lease structures grew in appeal for companies seeking to hedge against policy volatility. For reefer operators handling high-value perishables, tariff-induced margin compression led to tighter cost control and greater collaboration with lessors on service level agreements that protect cold chain integrity. Across the board, financiers and lessors reassessed residual value risk assumptions, adjusting underwriting criteria to reflect the increased likelihood of route reconfiguration and commodity substitution driven by tariff dynamics.
Segmentation-driven insights explaining how container type, lease duration, model, end-user profile and contract structure determine value and risk allocation
Key segmentation insights reveal how container type, lease duration, lease model, end user and contract type converge to define differentiated commercial outcomes and operational risk profiles. When examining container type, distinct demand patterns emerge among dry containers, reefer containers and tank containers; reefer demand further bifurcates between multi-temperature and single-temperature requirements, with multi-temperature units increasingly preferred by complex perishable logistics that require simultaneous cold chain zones. Lease duration segmentation highlights divergent operational imperatives: long-term tenors, broken into more than five years and intermediate bands of one to three years and three to five years, serve core fleet planning and capital efficiency objectives, whereas short-term arrangements, spanning less than three months, three to six months, and six to twelve months, deliver tactical capacity and seasonal flexibility.
Within lease model segmentation, finance leases including capital leases and sale-and-lease-back structures appeal to lessees seeking balance sheet ownership or working capital relief, while operating leases, encompassing direct leases and synthetic lease constructs, support off-balance-sheet flexibility and service-oriented propositions. End-user segmentation shows differentiated needs among freight forwarders, logistics companies and shipping lines, each of which values different combinations of asset control, maintenance support and contractual duration. Contract type segmentation separates fixed-rate arrangements-single rate or tiered rate- from floating-rate structures indexed to benchmarks such as LIBOR or SOFR, with each structure influencing cashflow predictability and interest rate exposure for both lessor and lessee. Understanding these interdependencies enables stakeholders to tailor product offerings and risk transfer mechanisms to specific customer profiles and operational rhythms.
Regional dynamics and infrastructure realities that influence container leasing strategies across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics display pronounced differences in demand drivers, regulatory environments and infrastructure maturity that materially affect leasing strategies across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, trade flows oriented to intra-regional supply chains and nearshoring trends stimulate demand for short-term and flexible leasing solutions, particularly for dry containers supporting manufacturing hubs and reefer units servicing agricultural exports. Port congestion mitigation and inland freight connectivity investments in several countries influence repositioning costs and the attractiveness of localized fleet basing strategies.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex mosaic of high regulatory oversight, environmental targets, and well-developed cold-chain networks that drive interest in higher-specification reefers and longer-term leasing arrangements backed by service packages. In contrast, Asia-Pacific remains the largest source and receiver of containerized trade and demonstrates strong demand for both long-term fleet commitments and agile short-term leasing to accommodate seasonal peaks and rapid growth corridors. Across regions, infrastructure investments, tariff regimes, and trade agreements shape strategic decisions around where to base fleets, how to structure multi-jurisdictional leases, and which contract types best balance predictability and flexibility.
How leading lessors and specialist operators differentiate through fleet focus, partnerships, and digital operational excellence to secure durable competitive advantage
A review of key company-level trends highlights how leading lessors, asset managers and specialist operators differentiate through fleet composition, service bundling and capital structuring. Market participants increasingly pursue strategic partnerships with maintenance providers, technology firms, and port operators to enhance asset uptime and provide integrated logistics solutions. Some firms adopt targeted fleet segmentation strategies, concentrating on reefers for temperature-sensitive supply chains while others focus on tank containers for chemical and bulk liquid logistics, thereby aligning operational capabilities with sectoral end-user needs.
At the corporate level, several trajectories stand out: alliances that secure long-term cargo volumes through contractual commitments, financing innovations that optimize balance sheet treatment and liquidity, and investment in telematics and predictive maintenance to substantively reduce downtime and unplanned repair costs. Competitive differentiation now rests on the ability to deliver contract flexibility, transparent pricing and value-added services that reduce total landed cost for lessees. Companies that embed digital performance metrics and clear service-level agreements into their lease propositions tend to achieve superior client retention and higher utilization rates over time.
Practical strategic actions to build portfolio resilience, enhance contractual flexibility and monetize digital and sustainability capabilities across leasing operations
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders emphasize strategic moves that balance resilience, customer-centricity, and financial discipline. First, lessors should prioritize modular lease design that permits rapid transition between short-term and long-term commitments without excessive administrative burden, enabling responsiveness to tariff shifts, seasonal demand, and route changes. Second, integrating predictive maintenance and telematics into standard contracts reduces downtime and improves transparency; firms should adopt common data standards to facilitate interoperability with customers and port systems. Third, align fleet investment with sustainability goals by selecting materials and end-of-life pathways that minimize lifecycle emissions and by offering green lease options that pass through incentives or credits to lessees.
Leaders must also refine risk underwriting by stress-testing residual value and repositioning costs under multiple trade-policy scenarios, and they should diversify funding sources to smooth capital cost volatility. Strengthen go-to-market approaches by bundling value-added services-such as maintenance, insurance overlays, and logistics coordination-into tiered product offerings that match specific end-user profiles. Finally, cultivate collaborative relationships with freight forwarders, logistics companies and shipping lines to co-design solutions that reduce total supply chain cost and increase asset utilization, thereby creating durable, mutually beneficial commercial arrangements.
A rigorous mixed-methods approach describing the primary and secondary research processes, validation steps and analytical techniques used to derive findings
The research methodology combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robust, verifiable insights and transparent analytical logic. Primary research comprises structured interviews and workshops with a cross-section of industry stakeholders, including lessors, logistics providers, freight forwarders, shipping lines and maintenance specialists, to capture operational realities, contract preferences, and contemporary risk perceptions. Secondary research involved the systematic review of public financial disclosures, trade flow datasets, port throughput statistics and industry publications to corroborate themes identified during interviews and to map structural drivers at the intersection of demand and asset management.
Analytical procedures included segmentation mapping to align container types, lease durations, lease models, contract structures and end-user behaviors, supplemented by sensitivity analysis to examine the effects of tariff shifts, route reconfigurations and interest rate variations on utilization and residual risk. Validation rounds with industry practitioners refined assumptions and interpretations. The methodology emphasizes reproducibility, and appendices document data sources, interview frameworks, and definitions used to ensure that conclusions follow logically from the underlying evidence base.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the imperative for agility, contractual innovation and digital-enabled service models to secure sustainable competitive advantage
In conclusion, the container leasing sector stands at a strategic inflection point where operational agility, contractual innovation, and digital-enabled service delivery determine competitive success. The interplay of container type specialization, tailored lease durations, and adaptable contract models allows lessors and lessees to manage risk while capturing new commercial opportunities. Tariff developments and regional infrastructure variations continue to influence routing and repositioning costs, reinforcing the need for scenario planning and flexible asset deployment.
Companies that invest in predictive maintenance, interoperable data platforms and sustainability-aligned fleet choices will improve utilization and client retention. Simultaneously, those that diversify funding structures and refine underwriting to reflect policy and trade volatility will better manage residual value exposure. The combined effect is a marketplace where differentiated service offerings, close customer collaboration and disciplined capital management create durable advantages. Stakeholders that act decisively on these priorities will be best positioned to convert market complexity into profitable, resilient growth trajectories.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of blockchain-enabled platforms for transparent container leasing transactions across global shipping networks
- 5.2. Integration of IoT sensor data to provide real-time tracking and condition monitoring for leased containers
- 5.3. Shift toward flexible short-term lease contracts driven by supply chain volatility and demand fluctuations
- 5.4. Increasing demand for refrigerated container leasing to support expansion of perishable goods trade in emerging markets
- 5.5. Growth of green leasing programs incentivizing energy-efficient reefer and dry containers to lower carbon footprint
- 5.6. Strategic partnerships between leasing firms and multimodal logistics providers aimed at optimizing container utilization rates
- 5.7. Rising use of big data analytics to forecast container availability and enable dynamic pricing during peak seasons
- 5.8. Digital transformation with AI-powered risk assessment tools for evaluating creditworthiness of leasing clients in container markets
- 5.9. Expansion of container leasing depots at inland rail hubs to reduce port congestion and improve cargo distribution efficiency
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Container Leasing Market, by Container Type
- 8.1. Dry Container
- 8.2. Reefer Container
- 8.2.1. Multi Temperature
- 8.2.2. Single Temperature
- 8.3. Tank Container
- 9. Container Leasing Market, by Lease Duration
- 9.1. Long Term
- 9.2. Short Term
- 10. Container Leasing Market, by Lease Model
- 10.1. Finance Lease
- 10.1.1. Capital Lease
- 10.1.2. Sale And Lease Back
- 10.2. Operating Lease
- 10.2.1. Direct Lease
- 10.2.2. Synthetic Lease
- 11. Container Leasing Market, by End User
- 11.1. Freight Forwarders
- 11.2. Logistic Companies
- 11.3. Shipping Lines
- 12. Container Leasing Market, by Contract Type
- 12.1. Fixed Rate
- 12.1.1. Single Rate
- 12.1.2. Tiered Rate
- 12.2. Floating Rate
- 12.2.1. LIBOR
- 12.2.2. SOFR
- 13. Container Leasing Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Container Leasing Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Container Leasing Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Textainer Group Holdings Limited
- 16.3.2. Triton International Limited
- 16.3.3. CAI International, Inc.
- 16.3.4. SeaCube Containers LLC
- 16.3.5. Hapag-Lloyd AG
- 16.3.6. Seaco Global LTD. by Global Sea Containers Ltd.
- 16.3.7. Oceanex Inc.
- 16.3.8. COSCO Shipping Development Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.9. Touax SCA
- 16.3.10. UES International (HK) Holdings Limited
- 16.3.11. Cronos Group
- 16.3.12. Blue Sky Intermodal Ltd.
- 16.3.13. Institute of International Container Lessors, Ltd.
- 16.3.14. Florens Asset Management Company Limited
- 16.3.15. Eurotainer SA
- 16.3.16. CARU Containers B.V.
- 16.3.17. W&K Containers, Inc.
- 16.3.18. Dong Fang International Asset Management Ltd.
- 16.3.19. VS&B CONTAINERS GROUP
- 16.3.20. SCF Group Pty Ltd
- 16.3.21. Raffles Lease Pte Ltd.
- 16.3.22. Matson, Inc.
- 16.3.23. Xines Container GmbH
- 16.3.24. Gateway Container International
- 16.3.25. K-Tainer BV
- 16.3.26. OEG Offshore LTD.
- 16.3.27. DCM Hyundai Limited
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
