Container Glass Market by Product Type (Bottles, Containers, Jars), Material (Borosilicate Glass, Lead Glass, Soda-Lime Glass), Manufacturing Process, Capacity Range, Container Shape, End Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Container Glass Market was valued at USD 97.84 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 106.36 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.31%, reaching USD 199.56 billion by 2032.
A concise contextual framing that connects supply chain dynamics, evolving end-use demand, and regulatory drivers to practical decisions for container glass leaders
The container glass industry operates at the intersection of materials science, consumer behavior, and global supply chain dynamics. As demand patterns shift and regulatory landscapes evolve, stakeholders across manufacturing, packaging, and end-use sectors must reassess traditional assumptions about material selection, production methods, and market access. This executive summary synthesizes core developments affecting competitive positioning, operational resilience, and product innovation for firms engaged with container glass across applications.
In the following sections, the analysis highlights transformative shifts reshaping the landscape, considerations arising from evolving trade policies, and segmentation and regional perspectives that underpin strategic decision-making. The aim is to provide a focused, pragmatic narrative that equips executives and functional leaders with the context needed to prioritize investments, manage risk, and capture emergent opportunities within the broader packaging ecosystem. By connecting technical, commercial, and regulatory threads, this summary frames next steps for leadership teams seeking to strengthen market position and accelerate sustainable growth.
An overview of material innovation, circularity mandates, and digital manufacturing advances that are redefining competitive advantage in container glass
The container glass sector is undergoing rapid transformation driven by material innovation, sustainability mandates, and shifting consumer preferences. Advances in glass composition and furnace technologies are improving thermal and chemical resistance while enabling lighter-weight designs, which in turn affect logistics economics and carbon footprints. Concurrently, brand owners and retailers are intensifying commitments to circularity, prompting greater emphasis on recyclability, refillable systems, and closed-loop initiatives that influence procurement decisions and product specifications.
Technological changes in forming and finishing processes are also altering cost structures and quality outcomes. Modernization of manufacturing lines, adoption of more efficient melt furnaces, and process controls that reduce variability are allowing producers to respond more nimbly to premiumization trends in categories such as specialty beverages and cosmetics. At the same time, digitalization across operations, from predictive maintenance to advanced process analytics, is enabling better yield management and energy optimization, reinforcing competitive differentiation for facilities that invest in modernization. As a result, stakeholders must balance investments in operational excellence with strategic partnerships that accelerate access to circular supply streams and high-value product segments.
How evolving tariff regimes and trade barriers are prompting supply chain restructuring, procurement renegotiation, and strategic moves toward localization and resilience
Recent tariff actions and trade policy adjustments have introduced new complexities to cross-border sourcing and pricing structures within the container glass value chain. Tariffs affect raw material flows, semi-finished import patterns, and the competitive calculus for exporting producers. As companies reassess supplier maps and cost pass-through strategies, the implications extend beyond immediate landed cost increases to broader choices about localization, vertical integration, and inventory policy.
In response to tariff-induced volatility, several manufacturers and brand owners are diversifying their sourcing strategies and increasing onshore capacity where feasible to mitigate exposure to sudden cost shifts. Others are renegotiating long-term supply agreements to include contingency clauses and cost-sharing mechanisms. Importantly, these adjustments are prompting a re-evaluation of strategic footprints: firms are weighing the benefits of proximity to key end markets against the capital intensity of establishing local production. Consequently, trade barriers are catalyzing a shift toward more resilient supply models that emphasize redundancy, nearshoring, and flexible contract structures to preserve service continuity and protect margins under fluctuating policy regimes.
Detailed segmentation analysis connecting material types, product forms, process technologies, and end-use applications to commercial and operational implications
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated demand drivers and margin pools that are essential for segment-focused strategy. Based on Material, the market distinguishes between borosilicate glass, known for high thermal and chemical resistance and strong suitability for laboratory and pharmaceutical applications; lead glass, valued for optical clarity in specialty niches; and soda-lime glass, which represents the dominant commodity grade for bottles and jars across consumer categories. Each material class carries unique processing requirements and end-use expectations, influencing capital intensity and downstream finishing needs.
Based on Product Type, the industry spans bottles, containers, jars, and vials, with bottles further segmented into alcohol bottles, beverage bottles, and pharmaceutical bottles. Alcohol bottles frequently emphasize premium aesthetics and heavier-weight formats that support brand differentiation, whereas beverage bottles balance cost, weight optimization, and oxygen/barrier performance. Pharmaceutical bottles and vials demand rigorous compliance, traceability, and contaminant control, driving investment in cleanroom-compatible production and serialization capabilities. Containers and jars serve diverse packaging roles across food and personal care, where closure systems, glass-to-plastic interactions, and secondary packaging considerations influence design choices.
Based on Manufacturing Process, production technologies include blow & blow, narrow neck press & blow, and press & blow methods, each offering trade-offs between speed, dimensional control, and wall thickness uniformity. Blow & blow remains prevalent for certain bottle forms, while press & blow and narrow neck press & blow enable tighter tolerances and are often preferred for specialty pharmaceutical and cosmetic containers. Process selection directly affects tooling costs, changeover time, and achievable cosmetic quality, thereby informing commercial segmentation and pricing strategies.
Based on End Use, applications span chemicals, cosmetics & personal care, food & beverages, and pharmaceuticals, with food & beverages subdivided into alcoholic beverages, food packaging, and non-alcoholic beverages. Chemical containers require compatibility with aggressive chemistries and often prioritize safety features. Cosmetics and personal care demand premium finishing and surface treatments to meet brand specifications. Food and beverage applications balance regulatory safety, shelf-life considerations, and visual merchandising needs, while pharmaceutical uses impose the strictest regulatory and quality-control regimes. These end-use distinctions influence R&D priorities, production validation protocols, and the commercial approach toward account management and regulatory support.
Comparative regional perspectives highlighting infrastructure, regulatory frameworks, and consumption trends that shape strategic choices across global markets
Regional patterns in demand, regulation, and infrastructure investment create distinct strategic landscapes that companies must navigate. The Americas market demonstrates a mix of mature demand segments and pockets of premiumization, with logistics networks supporting both large-scale beverage production and niche specialty glass producers. North American regulatory emphasis on recycling targets and extended producer responsibility frameworks is shaping packaging choices and incentivizing investment in closed-loop systems and recycled cullet integration.
The Europe, Middle East & Africa region features a diverse set of market conditions, where stringent environmental regulations, high consumer expectations for sustainability, and well-developed premium beverage markets drive demand for high-quality, recyclable glass solutions. Infrastructure for collection and recycling varies across countries, leading to different adoption rates for refillable and lightweighting initiatives, and necessitating localized strategies that align with national regulatory priorities and cultural consumption patterns.
Asia-Pacific remains a growth hotspot characterized by rapid urbanization, expanding middle-class consumption, and dynamic beverage and personal-care sectors. Production capacity investment in several countries has increased to meet domestic demand and regional export flows, while government policies and energy considerations influence technology choices in new plants. Across all regions, transportation costs, access to quality recycled cullet, and local regulatory frameworks will determine the optimal mix of centralized versus localized manufacturing footprints.
Competitive and partnership patterns where manufacturing excellence, circularity initiatives, and value-added services determine market positioning and customer retention
Competitive dynamics in the container glass space hinge on a combination of manufacturing scale, technological capability, and go-to-market specialization. Leading producers that invest in energy-efficient furnaces, advanced forming lines, and automation capture cost advantages and can offer a broader range of high-quality formats. In contrast, smaller, specialized manufacturers often compete on technical mastery for niche products such as borosilicate laboratory ware or premium decorative bottles, where craftsmanship and tight tolerances command higher margins.
Partnerships between glassmakers and brand owners are becoming more strategic, with co-development agreements for lightweighting, barrier treatments, and bespoke finishes. Companies that integrate circularity into their business models by securing consistent sources of recycled cullet or establishing take-back schemes strengthen customer relationships and reduce exposure to raw material volatility. Finally, third-party service providers offering fill-and-finish, labeling, or secondary packaging capabilities play an increasingly important role in value chains, enabling glass producers to offer end-to-end solutions that meet customer demand for turn-key packaging systems.
Actionable strategic moves focusing on energy efficiency, circular supply chains, precision production, and targeted localization to enhance resilience and margin
Industry leaders should prioritize strategic investments that balance short-term resilience with long-term competitiveness. First, accelerate decarbonization and energy-efficiency projects for furnaces and process lines to reduce operating costs and align with increasingly stringent regulatory expectations. This includes retrofitting existing assets where feasible and evaluating next-generation melting technologies that lower energy intensity. Second, develop robust recycled cullet sourcing strategies and collaborate with downstream stakeholders to increase collection rates and improve cullet quality, thereby reducing dependency on virgin raw materials.
Third, differentiate through product innovation and production flexibility by expanding capabilities in precision forming methods such as narrow neck press & blow for high-value pharmaceutical and cosmetic containers. Fourth, pursue targeted localization or nearshoring initiatives to mitigate trade policy exposure while preserving access to growth markets, using flexible contracts and shared investments to limit upfront capital risk. Finally, strengthen commercial partnerships with brand owners by offering integrated solutions-combining design, regulatory support, and logistics-to capture higher-value engagements and shorten sales cycles. These actions, taken together, will improve margins, minimize policy risk, and position companies to capitalize on shifting consumer and regulatory priorities.
A robust methodological approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and policy analysis to underpin practical and verifiable recommendations
The analysis behind this executive summary synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs across supply chain actors, technical literature, and regulatory publications. Structured interviews were conducted with industry stakeholders including manufacturing leaders, packaging engineers, and procurement executives to validate operational impacts and strategic responses. Technical assessments of production methods and material classes were informed by peer-reviewed engineering studies and manufacturer technical documentation to ensure accuracy in describing process trade-offs and performance characteristics.
Additionally, policy reviews examined recent trade measures and environmental regulations to identify implications for sourcing and compliance. Cross-regional comparisons drew on logistics and infrastructure data to contextualize investment and localization decisions. Throughout, the methodology emphasized triangulation: corroborating observations from interviews with technical sources and policy analysis to build a robust narrative while avoiding speculative projections. This approach ensures recommendations are grounded in verifiable practice and current regulatory realities.
A succinct synthesis underscoring the need for coordinated investments in sustainability, precision production, and strategic flexibility to secure durable competitive advantage
In conclusion, the container glass sector stands at a strategic inflection point where operational modernization, circularity commitments, and trade policy responses will determine winners and laggards. Companies that act decisively on energy efficiency and recycled input strategies will reduce cost volatility and meet rising sustainability expectations. Simultaneously, targeted investments in precision forming and quality systems will unlock higher-value segments in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and premium beverages, supporting margin expansion and customer retention.
To succeed, leadership teams must adopt a coordinated approach that aligns engineering investments, procurement strategies, and commercial partnerships. By doing so, firms will be better positioned to respond to regulatory shifts and capture differentiated demand driven by brand owners seeking sustainable, high-quality packaging. The coming years will reward organizations that combine disciplined execution with strategic flexibility, enabling them to convert industry transition into enduring competitive advantage.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise contextual framing that connects supply chain dynamics, evolving end-use demand, and regulatory drivers to practical decisions for container glass leaders
The container glass industry operates at the intersection of materials science, consumer behavior, and global supply chain dynamics. As demand patterns shift and regulatory landscapes evolve, stakeholders across manufacturing, packaging, and end-use sectors must reassess traditional assumptions about material selection, production methods, and market access. This executive summary synthesizes core developments affecting competitive positioning, operational resilience, and product innovation for firms engaged with container glass across applications.
In the following sections, the analysis highlights transformative shifts reshaping the landscape, considerations arising from evolving trade policies, and segmentation and regional perspectives that underpin strategic decision-making. The aim is to provide a focused, pragmatic narrative that equips executives and functional leaders with the context needed to prioritize investments, manage risk, and capture emergent opportunities within the broader packaging ecosystem. By connecting technical, commercial, and regulatory threads, this summary frames next steps for leadership teams seeking to strengthen market position and accelerate sustainable growth.
An overview of material innovation, circularity mandates, and digital manufacturing advances that are redefining competitive advantage in container glass
The container glass sector is undergoing rapid transformation driven by material innovation, sustainability mandates, and shifting consumer preferences. Advances in glass composition and furnace technologies are improving thermal and chemical resistance while enabling lighter-weight designs, which in turn affect logistics economics and carbon footprints. Concurrently, brand owners and retailers are intensifying commitments to circularity, prompting greater emphasis on recyclability, refillable systems, and closed-loop initiatives that influence procurement decisions and product specifications.
Technological changes in forming and finishing processes are also altering cost structures and quality outcomes. Modernization of manufacturing lines, adoption of more efficient melt furnaces, and process controls that reduce variability are allowing producers to respond more nimbly to premiumization trends in categories such as specialty beverages and cosmetics. At the same time, digitalization across operations, from predictive maintenance to advanced process analytics, is enabling better yield management and energy optimization, reinforcing competitive differentiation for facilities that invest in modernization. As a result, stakeholders must balance investments in operational excellence with strategic partnerships that accelerate access to circular supply streams and high-value product segments.
How evolving tariff regimes and trade barriers are prompting supply chain restructuring, procurement renegotiation, and strategic moves toward localization and resilience
Recent tariff actions and trade policy adjustments have introduced new complexities to cross-border sourcing and pricing structures within the container glass value chain. Tariffs affect raw material flows, semi-finished import patterns, and the competitive calculus for exporting producers. As companies reassess supplier maps and cost pass-through strategies, the implications extend beyond immediate landed cost increases to broader choices about localization, vertical integration, and inventory policy.
In response to tariff-induced volatility, several manufacturers and brand owners are diversifying their sourcing strategies and increasing onshore capacity where feasible to mitigate exposure to sudden cost shifts. Others are renegotiating long-term supply agreements to include contingency clauses and cost-sharing mechanisms. Importantly, these adjustments are prompting a re-evaluation of strategic footprints: firms are weighing the benefits of proximity to key end markets against the capital intensity of establishing local production. Consequently, trade barriers are catalyzing a shift toward more resilient supply models that emphasize redundancy, nearshoring, and flexible contract structures to preserve service continuity and protect margins under fluctuating policy regimes.
Detailed segmentation analysis connecting material types, product forms, process technologies, and end-use applications to commercial and operational implications
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated demand drivers and margin pools that are essential for segment-focused strategy. Based on Material, the market distinguishes between borosilicate glass, known for high thermal and chemical resistance and strong suitability for laboratory and pharmaceutical applications; lead glass, valued for optical clarity in specialty niches; and soda-lime glass, which represents the dominant commodity grade for bottles and jars across consumer categories. Each material class carries unique processing requirements and end-use expectations, influencing capital intensity and downstream finishing needs.
Based on Product Type, the industry spans bottles, containers, jars, and vials, with bottles further segmented into alcohol bottles, beverage bottles, and pharmaceutical bottles. Alcohol bottles frequently emphasize premium aesthetics and heavier-weight formats that support brand differentiation, whereas beverage bottles balance cost, weight optimization, and oxygen/barrier performance. Pharmaceutical bottles and vials demand rigorous compliance, traceability, and contaminant control, driving investment in cleanroom-compatible production and serialization capabilities. Containers and jars serve diverse packaging roles across food and personal care, where closure systems, glass-to-plastic interactions, and secondary packaging considerations influence design choices.
Based on Manufacturing Process, production technologies include blow & blow, narrow neck press & blow, and press & blow methods, each offering trade-offs between speed, dimensional control, and wall thickness uniformity. Blow & blow remains prevalent for certain bottle forms, while press & blow and narrow neck press & blow enable tighter tolerances and are often preferred for specialty pharmaceutical and cosmetic containers. Process selection directly affects tooling costs, changeover time, and achievable cosmetic quality, thereby informing commercial segmentation and pricing strategies.
Based on End Use, applications span chemicals, cosmetics & personal care, food & beverages, and pharmaceuticals, with food & beverages subdivided into alcoholic beverages, food packaging, and non-alcoholic beverages. Chemical containers require compatibility with aggressive chemistries and often prioritize safety features. Cosmetics and personal care demand premium finishing and surface treatments to meet brand specifications. Food and beverage applications balance regulatory safety, shelf-life considerations, and visual merchandising needs, while pharmaceutical uses impose the strictest regulatory and quality-control regimes. These end-use distinctions influence R&D priorities, production validation protocols, and the commercial approach toward account management and regulatory support.
Comparative regional perspectives highlighting infrastructure, regulatory frameworks, and consumption trends that shape strategic choices across global markets
Regional patterns in demand, regulation, and infrastructure investment create distinct strategic landscapes that companies must navigate. The Americas market demonstrates a mix of mature demand segments and pockets of premiumization, with logistics networks supporting both large-scale beverage production and niche specialty glass producers. North American regulatory emphasis on recycling targets and extended producer responsibility frameworks is shaping packaging choices and incentivizing investment in closed-loop systems and recycled cullet integration.
The Europe, Middle East & Africa region features a diverse set of market conditions, where stringent environmental regulations, high consumer expectations for sustainability, and well-developed premium beverage markets drive demand for high-quality, recyclable glass solutions. Infrastructure for collection and recycling varies across countries, leading to different adoption rates for refillable and lightweighting initiatives, and necessitating localized strategies that align with national regulatory priorities and cultural consumption patterns.
Asia-Pacific remains a growth hotspot characterized by rapid urbanization, expanding middle-class consumption, and dynamic beverage and personal-care sectors. Production capacity investment in several countries has increased to meet domestic demand and regional export flows, while government policies and energy considerations influence technology choices in new plants. Across all regions, transportation costs, access to quality recycled cullet, and local regulatory frameworks will determine the optimal mix of centralized versus localized manufacturing footprints.
Competitive and partnership patterns where manufacturing excellence, circularity initiatives, and value-added services determine market positioning and customer retention
Competitive dynamics in the container glass space hinge on a combination of manufacturing scale, technological capability, and go-to-market specialization. Leading producers that invest in energy-efficient furnaces, advanced forming lines, and automation capture cost advantages and can offer a broader range of high-quality formats. In contrast, smaller, specialized manufacturers often compete on technical mastery for niche products such as borosilicate laboratory ware or premium decorative bottles, where craftsmanship and tight tolerances command higher margins.
Partnerships between glassmakers and brand owners are becoming more strategic, with co-development agreements for lightweighting, barrier treatments, and bespoke finishes. Companies that integrate circularity into their business models by securing consistent sources of recycled cullet or establishing take-back schemes strengthen customer relationships and reduce exposure to raw material volatility. Finally, third-party service providers offering fill-and-finish, labeling, or secondary packaging capabilities play an increasingly important role in value chains, enabling glass producers to offer end-to-end solutions that meet customer demand for turn-key packaging systems.
Actionable strategic moves focusing on energy efficiency, circular supply chains, precision production, and targeted localization to enhance resilience and margin
Industry leaders should prioritize strategic investments that balance short-term resilience with long-term competitiveness. First, accelerate decarbonization and energy-efficiency projects for furnaces and process lines to reduce operating costs and align with increasingly stringent regulatory expectations. This includes retrofitting existing assets where feasible and evaluating next-generation melting technologies that lower energy intensity. Second, develop robust recycled cullet sourcing strategies and collaborate with downstream stakeholders to increase collection rates and improve cullet quality, thereby reducing dependency on virgin raw materials.
Third, differentiate through product innovation and production flexibility by expanding capabilities in precision forming methods such as narrow neck press & blow for high-value pharmaceutical and cosmetic containers. Fourth, pursue targeted localization or nearshoring initiatives to mitigate trade policy exposure while preserving access to growth markets, using flexible contracts and shared investments to limit upfront capital risk. Finally, strengthen commercial partnerships with brand owners by offering integrated solutions-combining design, regulatory support, and logistics-to capture higher-value engagements and shorten sales cycles. These actions, taken together, will improve margins, minimize policy risk, and position companies to capitalize on shifting consumer and regulatory priorities.
A robust methodological approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and policy analysis to underpin practical and verifiable recommendations
The analysis behind this executive summary synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs across supply chain actors, technical literature, and regulatory publications. Structured interviews were conducted with industry stakeholders including manufacturing leaders, packaging engineers, and procurement executives to validate operational impacts and strategic responses. Technical assessments of production methods and material classes were informed by peer-reviewed engineering studies and manufacturer technical documentation to ensure accuracy in describing process trade-offs and performance characteristics.
Additionally, policy reviews examined recent trade measures and environmental regulations to identify implications for sourcing and compliance. Cross-regional comparisons drew on logistics and infrastructure data to contextualize investment and localization decisions. Throughout, the methodology emphasized triangulation: corroborating observations from interviews with technical sources and policy analysis to build a robust narrative while avoiding speculative projections. This approach ensures recommendations are grounded in verifiable practice and current regulatory realities.
A succinct synthesis underscoring the need for coordinated investments in sustainability, precision production, and strategic flexibility to secure durable competitive advantage
In conclusion, the container glass sector stands at a strategic inflection point where operational modernization, circularity commitments, and trade policy responses will determine winners and laggards. Companies that act decisively on energy efficiency and recycled input strategies will reduce cost volatility and meet rising sustainability expectations. Simultaneously, targeted investments in precision forming and quality systems will unlock higher-value segments in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and premium beverages, supporting margin expansion and customer retention.
To succeed, leadership teams must adopt a coordinated approach that aligns engineering investments, procurement strategies, and commercial partnerships. By doing so, firms will be better positioned to respond to regulatory shifts and capture differentiated demand driven by brand owners seeking sustainable, high-quality packaging. The coming years will reward organizations that combine disciplined execution with strategic flexibility, enabling them to convert industry transition into enduring competitive advantage.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing adoption of advanced lightweight glass bottle designs to reduce shipping costs and carbon footprint
- 5.2. Implementation of closed-loop recycling systems by major producers to increase cullet utilization rates
- 5.3. Integration of digital printing technologies on glass containers for enhanced brand storytelling and customization
- 5.4. Development of energy efficient furnace technologies to lower production emissions in container glass plants
- 5.5. Expansion of circular economy initiatives through partnerships between glass manufacturers and packaging recyclers
- 5.6. Rising consumer demand for premium artisanal glass packaging driving small batch production innovations
- 5.7. Adoption of smart glass packaging with NFC tags for improved traceability and consumer engagement experiences
- 5.8. Stricter environmental regulations prompting investment in renewable energy sources for glass container manufacturing
- 5.9. Growth in online alcohol sales fueling demand for protective glass packaging with tamper evident closures
- 5.10. Shift towards bio-based glass coatings to enhance barrier properties while meeting sustainability targets
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Container Glass Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Bottles
- 8.1.1. Alcohol Bottles
- 8.1.2. Beverage Bottles
- 8.1.3. Pharmaceutical Bottles
- 8.2. Containers
- 8.3. Jars
- 8.4. Vials
- 9. Container Glass Market, by Material
- 9.1. Borosilicate Glass
- 9.2. Lead Glass
- 9.3. Soda-Lime Glass
- 10. Container Glass Market, by Manufacturing Process
- 10.1. Blow & Blow
- 10.2. Narrow Neck Press & Blow
- 10.3. Press & Blow
- 11. Container Glass Market, by Capacity Range
- 11.1. Less Than 30 Milliliters
- 11.2. 30 To 100 Milliliters
- 11.3. 101 To 250 Milliliters
- 11.4. 251 To 500 Milliliters
- 11.5. 501 Milliliters To 1 Liter
- 11.6. 1.1 To 3 Liters
- 11.7. Above 3 Liters
- 12. Container Glass Market, by Container Shape
- 12.1. Round Containers
- 12.1.1. Standard Round Containers
- 12.1.2. Boston Round Containers
- 12.2. Square Containers
- 12.3. Rectangular Containers
- 12.4. Oval Containers
- 12.5. Specialty And Custom Shapes
- 13. Container Glass Market, by End Use
- 13.1. Chemicals
- 13.2. Cosmetics & Personal Care
- 13.3. Food & Beverages
- 13.3.1. Alcoholic Beverages
- 13.3.2. Food Packaging
- 13.3.3. Non-Alcoholic Beverages
- 13.4. Pharmaceuticals
- 14. Container Glass Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Container Glass Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Container Glass Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Amcor PLC
- 17.3.2. Ardagh Group S.A.
- 17.3.3. Borosil Limited
- 17.3.4. Central Glass Co., Ltd. by Evotec SE
- 17.3.5. Corning Incorporated
- 17.3.6. FRIGOGLASS S.A.I.C.
- 17.3.7. Gerresheimer AG
- 17.3.8. O-I Glass, Inc. by Visy
- 17.3.9. PGP Glass Private Limited by The Blackstone Group
- 17.3.10. Saverglass SAS by Orora
- 17.3.11. Schott AG
- 17.3.12. SGD S.A.
- 17.3.13. Stevanato Group
- 17.3.14. Unitrade FZE
- 17.3.15. Vidrala S.A.
- 17.3.16. Vitro, S.A.B de C.V
- 17.3.17. AGI glaspac
- 17.3.18. Bundesverband Glasindustrie e.V.
- 17.3.19. British Glass Manufacturers' Confederation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
