Construction Repair Composites Market by Material Type (Cementitious Composites, Ceramic Matrix Composites, Metal Matrix Composites), Reinforcement (Aramid Fiber, Basalt Fiber, Carbon Fiber), Resin Type, Manufacturing Process, Form, Application, End Use -
Description
The Construction Repair Composites Market was valued at USD 479.23 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 528.19 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 10.29%, reaching USD 1,049.15 million by 2032.
A concise orientation to the evolving construction repair composites sector highlighting technological advances supply chain dynamics and specification implications
The construction repair composites sector sits at the intersection of accelerating infrastructure needs, material innovation, and evolving regulatory regimes. Advances in fiber and resin chemistry, combined with new manufacturing techniques, are expanding the functional scope of composites used for structural strengthening, joint sealing, surface repair, and crack remediation. These developments are occurring alongside rising expectations for durability, life-cycle performance, and reduced environmental impact, prompting procurement teams and engineering firms to reassess specifications and supplier relationships.
In practice, asset owners and contractors are prioritizing repair solutions that reduce downtime, improve long-term resilience, and integrate more predictably into existing construction workflows. Consequently, composite manufacturers and system integrators are pursuing product formulations and application methodologies that simplify on-site deployment while delivering measurable structural benefits. At the same time, material substitution dynamics and supply chain risk considerations are reshaping sourcing strategies across the ecosystem.
This introduction frames the remainder of the executive summary by outlining the major technological and commercial vectors affecting the sector. It emphasizes the practical implications for specification writers, contract managers, and strategic procurement leads, while preparing the reader for deeper treatment of policy, segmentation, regional dynamics, and actionable recommendations that follow.
How material innovation application-driven performance demands and trade realignment are jointly redefining specification practices procurement and long-term asset resilience
The landscape for construction repair composites is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three converging forces: material innovation, application-driven performance demands, and regulatory and trade realignments. Advancements in polymer chemistries and composite architectures are enabling materials that offer higher strength-to-weight ratios, greater chemical resistance, and enhanced adhesion to aged substrates. As a result, engineers are now specifying composites not merely as temporary patches but as integral, load-bearing components that extend service life and reduce whole-life costs.
Simultaneously, application demands have broadened beyond traditional crack injection toward integrated structural strengthening and system-level restoration, requiring composites that perform under dynamic loading and variable environmental exposure. This shift is fostering closer collaboration between material suppliers, applicators, and design engineers to validate performance through standardized testing protocols and case-study documentation.
Trade policy adjustments, procurement digitization, and the rising emphasis on sustainability further accelerate change. Supply chain diversification, nearshoring, and alternative resin systems are being evaluated to hedge against tariff volatility and raw material shortages. Taken together, these dynamics are not incremental; they fundamentally reshape how projects are specified, how suppliers compete, and how owners judge repair outcomes over multi-decade horizons.
A focused analysis of how 2025 tariff changes reshape sourcing, inventory, and supplier development strategies across composite material families
Tariff shifts announced for 2025 have introduced a new layer of commercial complexity that reverberates across sourcing, pricing, and supplier strategy. The imposition of tariffs on key upstream inputs and finished composite products has prompted buyers to reassess vendor footprints and raw material sourcing strategies to maintain competitive pricing and schedule certainty. For manufacturers with vertically integrated operations, the immediate response has centered on reallocating production, qualifying alternative resin suppliers, and accelerating supplier development programs in tariff-favored jurisdictions.
In parallel, distributors and applicators are evaluating contract clauses and inventory policies to mitigate margin erosion. Longer lead-time items and specialty resins have attracted particular attention, leading to changes in safety stock practices and an uptick in strategic forward purchasing. Importantly, tariff effects have not been uniform across material types; polymer composites reliant on specific thermoset chemistries have experienced different procurement pressures compared with cementitious or ceramic matrix systems, which shifts competitive dynamics among product families.
Looking forward, the tariff environment has catalyzed investment in supply chain visibility tools and scenario planning capabilities. Organizations are increasing cross-functional coordination between procurement, commercial teams, and technical functions to balance cost, availability, and performance objectives, while seeking contractual mechanisms to allocate tariff-related risk across the value chain.
Segment-driven clarity on how material types, application needs, end-use demands, reinforcement choices, resin chemistry, manufacturing processes and form factors interact
Understanding the market through precise segmentation illuminates where technical advances and commercial pressure points converge. When analyzed by material type, the landscape includes cementitious composites, ceramic matrix composites, metal matrix composites, and polymer composites, with the polymer cohort further differentiated into thermoplastic and thermoset categories; within thermoplastics, polyethylene, polypropylene, and PVC exhibit divergent processing windows and field performance, while thermosets such as epoxy, polyester, and vinyl ester differ significantly in cure behavior and environmental resistance. Each material family leads to varying installer skillsets, equipment needs, and specification pathways.
Examining application categories reveals that crack injection, crack stitching, joint sealing, structural strengthening, and surface repair each impose distinct performance and application constraints. Crack injection and joint sealing prioritize flowability and adhesion under tight tolerances, whereas structural strengthening demands consistent mechanical properties and proven long-term behavior under cyclic loads. Surface repair focuses on substrate compatibility and finish characteristics, influencing choice of both form and resin type.
End-use segmentation-commercial, industrial, infrastructure, residential, and transportation-highlights divergent procurement drivers: commercial and residential projects may emphasize cost-efficiency and aesthetics, industrial sites prioritize chemical resistance and rapid return-to-service, infrastructure clients demand documented durability and regulatory compliance, and transportation applications require resistance to dynamic loads and environmental exposure. Reinforcement choices, spanning aramid, basalt, carbon, glass, and natural fibers, in combination with resin type selection-epoxy, polyester, polyurethane, and vinyl ester-define the composite’s mechanical envelope and lifecycle considerations, while manufacturing processes such as filament winding, hand layup, pultrusion, spray-up, and vacuum infusion determine scalability, repeatability, and on-site adaptability. Finally, the form factor-liquid, paste, powder, or sheet-shapes logistics, application methods, and installer training requirements, making form a critical determinant of field adoption rates.
How regional procurement mandates climatic conditions regulatory variation and localized manufacturing capabilities shape composite selection and commercialization strategies
Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on material preferences, regulatory drivers, and commercial models across the global repair composites landscape. In the Americas, procurement decisions are increasingly shaped by life-cycle cost analysis and a strong focus on infrastructure renewal, which favors solutions that demonstrate long-term performance and demonstrable maintenance savings. This environment has encouraged manufacturers to offer technical support packages and warranty frameworks that align with owner risk profiles.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory complexity and diverse climatic conditions create a patchwork of specification drivers. European markets often emphasize environmental credentials and recyclability, pushing players to explore lower-emission resins and circular economy-aligned offerings, while Middle Eastern projects prioritize materials that withstand high temperature and UV exposure. African markets, with emerging infrastructure needs, present opportunities for cost-effective, robust solutions that can be deployed with limited on-site resources.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization and large-scale infrastructure programs are major demand catalysts, but the regional supply base is also advancing rapidly in manufacturing capability and process innovation. Localized production, coupled with government procurement policies and regional trade agreements, influences sourcing choices and encourages foreign and domestic suppliers to pursue strategic partnerships and technology transfers. These regional differentiators shape product roadmaps, commercial approaches, and go-to-market priorities for firms operating globally.
An examination of competitive strategies demonstrating how portfolio depth, technical services, partnerships, and targeted M&A activity determine market positioning
Competitive dynamics within the construction repair composites sector reflect an interplay of scale, application expertise, and technical service capabilities. Leading players differentiate through breadth of material portfolios combined with application-specific system validation and installer training programs, while niche innovators gain traction by focusing on high-performance chemistries or specialized reinforcement systems. Strategic partnerships between material developers and applicators have emerged as a recurring model to accelerate adoption and reduce deployment risk for end users.
Supply-side consolidation and targeted acquisitions are evident as firms seek to control critical upstream inputs or to add complementary application expertise. At the same time, smaller technology-driven companies are carving out positions by delivering demonstrable performance improvements or by offering lower-carbon resin alternatives. Channel dynamics vary by region; in some markets distributors play a crucial role in technical training and specification advocacy, whereas in others direct manufacturer engagement with owners and engineering firms is more common.
Across the competitive landscape, the ability to provide robust technical documentation, case studies, and service-level commitments is increasingly decisive. Buyers are awarding contracts not solely on material properties but on the total offering: technical support, certification compliance, and the capacity to scale field operations reliably and safely.
Practical and prioritized strategic actions for manufacturers, applicators, and owners to build resilience, capture value, and accelerate specification uptake in repair composites
Industry leaders should adopt a dual-track approach that balances near-term commercial resilience with medium-term capability investments. In the immediate term, firms must prioritize supply chain diversification and nearshoring options to mitigate tariff exposure and material volatility, while implementing contractual mechanisms to allocate cost risks transparently. Simultaneously, accelerating installer training and certifying application crews will reduce variability in field outcomes and strengthen customer confidence, thereby supporting premium positioning for higher-margin system solutions.
For the medium term, companies ought to invest in advanced resin research, low-carbon formulation development, and reinforcement optimization to meet evolving regulatory and sustainability expectations. Strategic partnerships with engineering firms and infrastructure owners can de-risk product validation and generate early-adopter case studies that expedite broader specification uptake. Additionally, firms should enhance digital tools for specification management, inventory forecasting, and scenario-based supplier planning to improve responsiveness and to enable data-driven commercial negotiations.
Implementation of these recommendations requires cross-functional alignment between R&D, commercial, and operations teams, and a disciplined program management approach to ensure that capability investments translate into measurable improvements in market access and margin performance.
A transparent research approach combining primary interviews, technical documentation, patent analysis and scenario-based validation to ensure actionable insights
This research synthesizes primary interviews with technical leaders, procurement executives, and application specialists, supplemented by detailed vendor documentation, patent analyses, and regulatory guidance. Primary inputs were collected through structured interviews and follow-up validation sessions to ensure technical assertions were corroborated by practitioners with direct project experience. Vendor- and project-level documentation provided verification of material formulations, application methodologies, and performance claims, while patent landscape reviews offered visibility into directional innovation trends.
Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-validation across multiple evidence streams. Technical performance claims were assessed against third-party standards where available and compared with documented field outcomes to evaluate real-world durability. Supply chain and policy impacts were analyzed using scenario-based modeling and sensitivity checks to assess implications for procurement strategies and inventory management. Where gaps existed, conservative assumptions were applied and explicitly noted in internal working models to preserve analytical integrity.
Ethical research practices were observed throughout, with interview participants engaged under non-attribution conditions when requested, and commercial data treated with strict confidentiality. The methodology prioritizes transparency and traceability of insights to support robust decision-making by industry stakeholders.
A concise synthesis emphasizing the strategic choices that determine leadership as innovations, policy shifts and procurement behaviors reshape repair composite adoption
The construction repair composites sector stands at an inflection point where material innovation, application sophistication, and external policy forces converge to reshape competitive dynamics and specification behavior. Stakeholders who proactively adapt procurement practices, invest in supply chain resilience, and prioritize evidence-based product validation will be best positioned to convert the changing landscape into durable commercial advantage. Conversely, organizations that delay addressing tariff-induced supply risks, installer competency gaps, and evolving environmental expectations will face increased cost and specification headwinds.
Forward-looking firms have an opportunity to lead by integrating low-carbon and high-performance material options into validated system offerings, supporting adoption through rigorous case studies and installer certification programs. Such investments not only mitigate near-term commercial risk but also align with broader public- and private-sector objectives around infrastructure longevity and sustainability. Ultimately, the strategic choices made today regarding sourcing architecture, product portfolios, and go-to-market models will determine market leadership as the sector evolves.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to the evolving construction repair composites sector highlighting technological advances supply chain dynamics and specification implications
The construction repair composites sector sits at the intersection of accelerating infrastructure needs, material innovation, and evolving regulatory regimes. Advances in fiber and resin chemistry, combined with new manufacturing techniques, are expanding the functional scope of composites used for structural strengthening, joint sealing, surface repair, and crack remediation. These developments are occurring alongside rising expectations for durability, life-cycle performance, and reduced environmental impact, prompting procurement teams and engineering firms to reassess specifications and supplier relationships.
In practice, asset owners and contractors are prioritizing repair solutions that reduce downtime, improve long-term resilience, and integrate more predictably into existing construction workflows. Consequently, composite manufacturers and system integrators are pursuing product formulations and application methodologies that simplify on-site deployment while delivering measurable structural benefits. At the same time, material substitution dynamics and supply chain risk considerations are reshaping sourcing strategies across the ecosystem.
This introduction frames the remainder of the executive summary by outlining the major technological and commercial vectors affecting the sector. It emphasizes the practical implications for specification writers, contract managers, and strategic procurement leads, while preparing the reader for deeper treatment of policy, segmentation, regional dynamics, and actionable recommendations that follow.
How material innovation application-driven performance demands and trade realignment are jointly redefining specification practices procurement and long-term asset resilience
The landscape for construction repair composites is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three converging forces: material innovation, application-driven performance demands, and regulatory and trade realignments. Advancements in polymer chemistries and composite architectures are enabling materials that offer higher strength-to-weight ratios, greater chemical resistance, and enhanced adhesion to aged substrates. As a result, engineers are now specifying composites not merely as temporary patches but as integral, load-bearing components that extend service life and reduce whole-life costs.
Simultaneously, application demands have broadened beyond traditional crack injection toward integrated structural strengthening and system-level restoration, requiring composites that perform under dynamic loading and variable environmental exposure. This shift is fostering closer collaboration between material suppliers, applicators, and design engineers to validate performance through standardized testing protocols and case-study documentation.
Trade policy adjustments, procurement digitization, and the rising emphasis on sustainability further accelerate change. Supply chain diversification, nearshoring, and alternative resin systems are being evaluated to hedge against tariff volatility and raw material shortages. Taken together, these dynamics are not incremental; they fundamentally reshape how projects are specified, how suppliers compete, and how owners judge repair outcomes over multi-decade horizons.
A focused analysis of how 2025 tariff changes reshape sourcing, inventory, and supplier development strategies across composite material families
Tariff shifts announced for 2025 have introduced a new layer of commercial complexity that reverberates across sourcing, pricing, and supplier strategy. The imposition of tariffs on key upstream inputs and finished composite products has prompted buyers to reassess vendor footprints and raw material sourcing strategies to maintain competitive pricing and schedule certainty. For manufacturers with vertically integrated operations, the immediate response has centered on reallocating production, qualifying alternative resin suppliers, and accelerating supplier development programs in tariff-favored jurisdictions.
In parallel, distributors and applicators are evaluating contract clauses and inventory policies to mitigate margin erosion. Longer lead-time items and specialty resins have attracted particular attention, leading to changes in safety stock practices and an uptick in strategic forward purchasing. Importantly, tariff effects have not been uniform across material types; polymer composites reliant on specific thermoset chemistries have experienced different procurement pressures compared with cementitious or ceramic matrix systems, which shifts competitive dynamics among product families.
Looking forward, the tariff environment has catalyzed investment in supply chain visibility tools and scenario planning capabilities. Organizations are increasing cross-functional coordination between procurement, commercial teams, and technical functions to balance cost, availability, and performance objectives, while seeking contractual mechanisms to allocate tariff-related risk across the value chain.
Segment-driven clarity on how material types, application needs, end-use demands, reinforcement choices, resin chemistry, manufacturing processes and form factors interact
Understanding the market through precise segmentation illuminates where technical advances and commercial pressure points converge. When analyzed by material type, the landscape includes cementitious composites, ceramic matrix composites, metal matrix composites, and polymer composites, with the polymer cohort further differentiated into thermoplastic and thermoset categories; within thermoplastics, polyethylene, polypropylene, and PVC exhibit divergent processing windows and field performance, while thermosets such as epoxy, polyester, and vinyl ester differ significantly in cure behavior and environmental resistance. Each material family leads to varying installer skillsets, equipment needs, and specification pathways.
Examining application categories reveals that crack injection, crack stitching, joint sealing, structural strengthening, and surface repair each impose distinct performance and application constraints. Crack injection and joint sealing prioritize flowability and adhesion under tight tolerances, whereas structural strengthening demands consistent mechanical properties and proven long-term behavior under cyclic loads. Surface repair focuses on substrate compatibility and finish characteristics, influencing choice of both form and resin type.
End-use segmentation-commercial, industrial, infrastructure, residential, and transportation-highlights divergent procurement drivers: commercial and residential projects may emphasize cost-efficiency and aesthetics, industrial sites prioritize chemical resistance and rapid return-to-service, infrastructure clients demand documented durability and regulatory compliance, and transportation applications require resistance to dynamic loads and environmental exposure. Reinforcement choices, spanning aramid, basalt, carbon, glass, and natural fibers, in combination with resin type selection-epoxy, polyester, polyurethane, and vinyl ester-define the composite’s mechanical envelope and lifecycle considerations, while manufacturing processes such as filament winding, hand layup, pultrusion, spray-up, and vacuum infusion determine scalability, repeatability, and on-site adaptability. Finally, the form factor-liquid, paste, powder, or sheet-shapes logistics, application methods, and installer training requirements, making form a critical determinant of field adoption rates.
How regional procurement mandates climatic conditions regulatory variation and localized manufacturing capabilities shape composite selection and commercialization strategies
Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on material preferences, regulatory drivers, and commercial models across the global repair composites landscape. In the Americas, procurement decisions are increasingly shaped by life-cycle cost analysis and a strong focus on infrastructure renewal, which favors solutions that demonstrate long-term performance and demonstrable maintenance savings. This environment has encouraged manufacturers to offer technical support packages and warranty frameworks that align with owner risk profiles.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory complexity and diverse climatic conditions create a patchwork of specification drivers. European markets often emphasize environmental credentials and recyclability, pushing players to explore lower-emission resins and circular economy-aligned offerings, while Middle Eastern projects prioritize materials that withstand high temperature and UV exposure. African markets, with emerging infrastructure needs, present opportunities for cost-effective, robust solutions that can be deployed with limited on-site resources.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization and large-scale infrastructure programs are major demand catalysts, but the regional supply base is also advancing rapidly in manufacturing capability and process innovation. Localized production, coupled with government procurement policies and regional trade agreements, influences sourcing choices and encourages foreign and domestic suppliers to pursue strategic partnerships and technology transfers. These regional differentiators shape product roadmaps, commercial approaches, and go-to-market priorities for firms operating globally.
An examination of competitive strategies demonstrating how portfolio depth, technical services, partnerships, and targeted M&A activity determine market positioning
Competitive dynamics within the construction repair composites sector reflect an interplay of scale, application expertise, and technical service capabilities. Leading players differentiate through breadth of material portfolios combined with application-specific system validation and installer training programs, while niche innovators gain traction by focusing on high-performance chemistries or specialized reinforcement systems. Strategic partnerships between material developers and applicators have emerged as a recurring model to accelerate adoption and reduce deployment risk for end users.
Supply-side consolidation and targeted acquisitions are evident as firms seek to control critical upstream inputs or to add complementary application expertise. At the same time, smaller technology-driven companies are carving out positions by delivering demonstrable performance improvements or by offering lower-carbon resin alternatives. Channel dynamics vary by region; in some markets distributors play a crucial role in technical training and specification advocacy, whereas in others direct manufacturer engagement with owners and engineering firms is more common.
Across the competitive landscape, the ability to provide robust technical documentation, case studies, and service-level commitments is increasingly decisive. Buyers are awarding contracts not solely on material properties but on the total offering: technical support, certification compliance, and the capacity to scale field operations reliably and safely.
Practical and prioritized strategic actions for manufacturers, applicators, and owners to build resilience, capture value, and accelerate specification uptake in repair composites
Industry leaders should adopt a dual-track approach that balances near-term commercial resilience with medium-term capability investments. In the immediate term, firms must prioritize supply chain diversification and nearshoring options to mitigate tariff exposure and material volatility, while implementing contractual mechanisms to allocate cost risks transparently. Simultaneously, accelerating installer training and certifying application crews will reduce variability in field outcomes and strengthen customer confidence, thereby supporting premium positioning for higher-margin system solutions.
For the medium term, companies ought to invest in advanced resin research, low-carbon formulation development, and reinforcement optimization to meet evolving regulatory and sustainability expectations. Strategic partnerships with engineering firms and infrastructure owners can de-risk product validation and generate early-adopter case studies that expedite broader specification uptake. Additionally, firms should enhance digital tools for specification management, inventory forecasting, and scenario-based supplier planning to improve responsiveness and to enable data-driven commercial negotiations.
Implementation of these recommendations requires cross-functional alignment between R&D, commercial, and operations teams, and a disciplined program management approach to ensure that capability investments translate into measurable improvements in market access and margin performance.
A transparent research approach combining primary interviews, technical documentation, patent analysis and scenario-based validation to ensure actionable insights
This research synthesizes primary interviews with technical leaders, procurement executives, and application specialists, supplemented by detailed vendor documentation, patent analyses, and regulatory guidance. Primary inputs were collected through structured interviews and follow-up validation sessions to ensure technical assertions were corroborated by practitioners with direct project experience. Vendor- and project-level documentation provided verification of material formulations, application methodologies, and performance claims, while patent landscape reviews offered visibility into directional innovation trends.
Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-validation across multiple evidence streams. Technical performance claims were assessed against third-party standards where available and compared with documented field outcomes to evaluate real-world durability. Supply chain and policy impacts were analyzed using scenario-based modeling and sensitivity checks to assess implications for procurement strategies and inventory management. Where gaps existed, conservative assumptions were applied and explicitly noted in internal working models to preserve analytical integrity.
Ethical research practices were observed throughout, with interview participants engaged under non-attribution conditions when requested, and commercial data treated with strict confidentiality. The methodology prioritizes transparency and traceability of insights to support robust decision-making by industry stakeholders.
A concise synthesis emphasizing the strategic choices that determine leadership as innovations, policy shifts and procurement behaviors reshape repair composite adoption
The construction repair composites sector stands at an inflection point where material innovation, application sophistication, and external policy forces converge to reshape competitive dynamics and specification behavior. Stakeholders who proactively adapt procurement practices, invest in supply chain resilience, and prioritize evidence-based product validation will be best positioned to convert the changing landscape into durable commercial advantage. Conversely, organizations that delay addressing tariff-induced supply risks, installer competency gaps, and evolving environmental expectations will face increased cost and specification headwinds.
Forward-looking firms have an opportunity to lead by integrating low-carbon and high-performance material options into validated system offerings, supporting adoption through rigorous case studies and installer certification programs. Such investments not only mitigate near-term commercial risk but also align with broader public- and private-sector objectives around infrastructure longevity and sustainability. Ultimately, the strategic choices made today regarding sourcing architecture, product portfolios, and go-to-market models will determine market leadership as the sector evolves.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
199 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising adoption of ecofriendly bio-based epoxy composites for structural repair in sustainable construction
- 5.2. Integration of 3D printed fiber reinforced polymers for rapid on-site concrete restoration and customization
- 5.3. Growing demand for high-performance carbon fiber wrap systems for seismic retrofit of aging infrastructure
- 5.4. Development of self-healing polymer composites with microencapsulated healing agents for crack repair
- 5.5. Use of nanotechnology-enhanced repair mortars with improved adhesion and durability in harsh environments
- 5.6. Shift toward prefabricated composite repair panels for faster building envelope rehabilitation
- 5.7. Emergence of digital twin integration for predictive maintenance using composite repair data analytics
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Construction Repair Composites Market, by Material Type
- 8.1. Cementitious Composites
- 8.2. Ceramic Matrix Composites
- 8.3. Metal Matrix Composites
- 8.4. Polymer Composites
- 8.4.1. Thermoplastic
- 8.4.1.1. Polyethylene
- 8.4.1.2. Polypropylene
- 8.4.1.3. PVC
- 8.4.2. Thermoset
- 8.4.2.1. Epoxy
- 8.4.2.2. Polyester
- 8.4.2.3. Vinyl Ester
- 9. Construction Repair Composites Market, by Reinforcement
- 9.1. Aramid Fiber
- 9.2. Basalt Fiber
- 9.3. Carbon Fiber
- 9.4. Glass Fiber
- 9.5. Natural Fiber
- 10. Construction Repair Composites Market, by Resin Type
- 10.1. Epoxy
- 10.2. Polyester
- 10.3. Polyurethane
- 10.4. Vinyl Ester
- 11. Construction Repair Composites Market, by Manufacturing Process
- 11.1. Filament Winding
- 11.2. Hand Layup
- 11.3. Pultrusion
- 11.4. Spray-Up
- 11.5. Vacuum Infusion
- 12. Construction Repair Composites Market, by Form
- 12.1. Liquid
- 12.2. Paste
- 12.3. Powder
- 12.4. Sheet
- 13. Construction Repair Composites Market, by Application
- 13.1. Crack Injection
- 13.2. Crack Stitching
- 13.3. Joint Sealing
- 13.4. Structural Strengthening
- 13.5. Surface Repair
- 14. Construction Repair Composites Market, by End Use
- 14.1. Commercial
- 14.2. Industrial
- 14.3. Infrastructure
- 14.4. Residential
- 14.5. Transportation
- 15. Construction Repair Composites Market, by Region
- 15.1. Americas
- 15.1.1. North America
- 15.1.2. Latin America
- 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 15.2.1. Europe
- 15.2.2. Middle East
- 15.2.3. Africa
- 15.3. Asia-Pacific
- 16. Construction Repair Composites Market, by Group
- 16.1. ASEAN
- 16.2. GCC
- 16.3. European Union
- 16.4. BRICS
- 16.5. G7
- 16.6. NATO
- 17. Construction Repair Composites Market, by Country
- 17.1. United States
- 17.2. Canada
- 17.3. Mexico
- 17.4. Brazil
- 17.5. United Kingdom
- 17.6. Germany
- 17.7. France
- 17.8. Russia
- 17.9. Italy
- 17.10. Spain
- 17.11. China
- 17.12. India
- 17.13. Japan
- 17.14. Australia
- 17.15. South Korea
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 18.3. Competitive Analysis
- 18.3.1. Sika AG
- 18.3.2. RPM International Inc.
- 18.3.3. BASF SE
- 18.3.4. The Dow Chemical Company
- 18.3.5. Arkema SA
- 18.3.6. W. R. Grace & Co.
- 18.3.7. MAPEI S.p.A.
- 18.3.8. Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A.
- 18.3.9. H.B. Fuller Company
- 18.3.10. Fosroc International Ltd
- 18.3.11. Hexcel Corporation
- 18.3.12. Toray Industries, Inc.
- 18.3.13. 3M Company
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
