Concierge Medicine Market by Service Offering (Chronic Disease Management, Diagnostics, Preventive Care), Provider Type (Group Practice, Multi Specialty Clinic, Solo Practitioner), Service Model, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Concierge Medicine Market was valued at USD 21.25 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 23.07 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 11.00%, reaching USD 49.00 billion by 2032.
An authoritative orientation to the contemporary concierge medicine environment clarifying core drivers that shape patient expectations and provider strategies
The concierge medicine sector is undergoing a period of purposeful reinvention as expectations among high-value patients, providers, and payers converge toward more personalized, outcomes-focused care. This executive summary opens by framing the contemporary landscape in which time-poor patients demand seamless access, clinicians seek sustainable practice models, and technology enables new modalities of care delivery. By articulating the core drivers-consumer preference for convenience, clinician workforce pressures, and the maturation of virtual care platforms-this introduction establishes the context for deeper analysis.
As we proceed, the narrative emphasizes how concierge models are differentiating along service scope, membership economics, and integration with broader healthcare ecosystems. The following sections synthesize structural shifts, regulatory and trade headwinds, segmentation dynamics, and regional nuances that together shape strategic options for market participants. Stakeholders will find a balanced appraisal that highlights opportunities to enhance patient value while maintaining operational and financial resilience.
How converging technological advances, demographic pressures, and payment innovations are reshaping the delivery and economics of personalized primary care
Transformations in the concierge medicine landscape are driven by converging technological, demographic, and behavioral forces that are reshaping both demand and supply. Digital triage, remote monitoring, and teleconsultation have lowered the friction for virtual-first interactions, while providers increasingly adopt hybrid practice structures that blend in-person continuity with digital touchpoints. Simultaneously, aging populations and the rising prevalence of chronic conditions have intensified demand for longitudinal care models that emphasize prevention and management over episodic interventions.
Concurrently, payment innovations and alternative membership tiers are enabling a wider set of practices to adopt concierge approaches, thereby broadening the addressable patient base beyond high-net-worth individuals. Regulatory attention to data security and interoperability imposes design constraints but also creates incentives for platform standardization and partnership. Together, these shifts create a landscape where nimble providers who integrate virtual offerings, chronic disease management protocols, and differentiated membership tiers can capture durable competitive advantage. Transitional coordination between care delivery and technology vendors will be decisive in accelerating value realization across the sector.
Assessing how changes in trade policy and tariffs create procurement cost pressure and drive strategic vendor selection and operational redesign across practices
Recent tariff dynamics affecting imported medical devices, diagnostic equipment, and certain biopharmaceutical supplies have introduced cost variability that ripples through practice operations. For concierge medicine providers that rely on a mix of in-clinic diagnostics, imaging services, and remote monitoring devices, increased import costs can elevate capital expenditures and recurring supply prices. This environment incentivizes procurement diversification and stronger supplier negotiations to protect margin integrity without compromising clinical capability.
Practices are responding by reassessing equipment lifecycles, expanding partnerships with domestic manufacturers, and selectively localizing procurement for high-utilization items. In parallel, there is a rising emphasis on optimizing clinical workflows to reduce dependence on high-cost imported consumables; expanding point-of-care testing and leveraging telehealth where clinically appropriate are examples of how operational redesign can mitigate tariff exposure. Over time, providers that embed tariff sensitivity into budgeting and vendor selection will preserve service quality while maintaining membership value propositions, and payers and employers seeking to partner with concierge providers will increasingly evaluate supply chain robustness as part of contracting criteria.
Deep segmentation insights revealing how service model, membership pricing, clinical scope, provider structure, and distribution choices determine competitive positioning
Segmentation reveals meaningful differentiation in how services are delivered, priced, and consumed, and these distinctions inform tailored competitive strategies. Practices organized by service model demonstrate divergent operational profiles: hybrid models blend traditional face-to-face continuity with telehealth touchpoints and typically concentrate on scalability and integrated care pathways, whereas traditional models emphasize in-person relationships and may prioritize bespoke patient experiences over high-volume throughput. Each approach has implications for staff mix, space utilization, and technology investment.
Membership fee tiers shape the expectation set for access and service depth. High-fee tiers commonly offer expanded care coordination, longer appointment times, and additional ancillary services, while mid and low tiers often streamline offerings while preserving core preventive and chronic care management. Service offering segmentation highlights where providers can differentiate clinically: chronic disease management encompassing cancer follow-up, cardiovascular management, and diabetes management requires sophisticated care pathways and coordination with specialists; diagnostics that incorporate imaging services and lab testing support timely decision-making; preventive care centered on annual physicals, health screenings, and immunizations underpins long-term population health; and wellness services spanning fitness planning, mental health counseling, and nutrition counseling extend care beyond pathology into sustained wellbeing. Mental health counseling itself is evolving to include both in-person therapy and teletherapy modalities, delivering accessibility and scalability.
Provider type influences organizational culture, referral patterns, and capital structure. Group practices and multi-specialty clinics often leverage scale to offer a broader set of services and invest in integrated data systems, whereas solo practitioners can differentiate through hyper-personalized relationships and flexible fee arrangements. Distribution channel choices-ranging from in-person to integrated offerings that combine clinic visits or house calls with telehealth, and fully virtual models enabled by mobile health apps, remote monitoring, and teleconsultation-determine the patient journey and the nature of ongoing engagement. Mobile health apps themselves bifurcate into disease management apps and wellness tracking apps, each serving distinct use cases that feed back into membership value and clinical outcomes. Understanding these layered segmentation axes allows leaders to align service design with target patient cohorts and operational capabilities.
Comparative regional analysis underscoring how regulatory regimes, payer structures, and cultural preferences shape adoption and scaling opportunities across major global markets
Regional dynamics materially influence adoption patterns, regulatory considerations, and partnership opportunities across key global markets. In the Americas, patient willingness to pay for convenience and continuity has fostered a mature market where private pay models and employer-sponsored concierge offerings coexist; this region also exhibits concentrated innovation in telehealth reimbursement and integrated care pilots. Europe, the Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where national health systems, private markets, and regulatory variance create pockets of rapid adoption alongside more cautious expansion; cross-border partnerships and accreditation standards inform how providers scale while adapting to local patient expectations.
The Asia-Pacific region is notable for fast adoption of digital-first solutions and an expanding middle class that seeks premium, accessible care. Provider networks in these markets often emphasize partnerships with technology platforms and insurers to broaden reach, and local regulatory evolution around telemedicine and data governance is shaping the speed and form of market entry. Across regions, cultural preferences for in-person versus virtual interactions, differential provider supply constraints, and the pace of reimbursement reform create a patchwork of strategic opportunities. Effective regional strategies therefore require nuanced market entry plans that balance standardization of core offerings with local customization of service delivery and pricing.
Critical corporate behaviors and partnerships that define market leaders, emerging disruptors, and the strategic levers that drive sustainable competitive advantage in healthcare delivery
Company-level dynamics reveal a spectrum of strategic postures from integrated multi-specialty platforms to boutique practices that emphasize high-touch relationships. Leading providers are investing in interoperable clinical platforms, advanced scheduling and patient engagement tools, and data-driven care pathways that codify best practices for chronic disease management and preventive care. Strategic partnerships with diagnostics providers and digital health vendors are increasingly common as organizations seek to expand service breadth without incurring disproportionate capital commitments.
Concurrently, newer entrants are differentiating through membership design, offering tiered access and value-added services such as in-home visits, personalized wellness coaching, and rapid diagnostic access. Talent strategies vary, with some companies centralizing clinical oversight and others enabling distributed clinician autonomy to preserve the intimacy of the physician-patient relationship. Competitive advantage is increasingly derived from the ability to demonstrate measurable improvements in patient experience and continuity of care, to operationalize data security and compliance, and to scale repeatable workflows that preserve clinical quality while managing cost. Observing competitor moves in technology adoption, alliance formation, and membership innovation provides a practical playbook for incumbents and newcomers alike.
Actionable strategic imperatives for providers to align membership design, digital infrastructure, supply resilience, and clinician models to sustain growth and quality
Industry leaders must prioritize coherent strategies that align clinical excellence with scalable operational design. This begins with a disciplined evaluation of the service model and membership tiering to ensure that offerings match target patient segments while enabling predictable revenue and capacity planning. Investing in interoperable digital infrastructure and standardized chronic disease management pathways will reduce variability in outcomes and support care coordination with specialist networks and diagnostic partners. By integrating point-of-care testing and remote monitoring where clinically justified, practices can reduce friction for patients and enhance diagnostic velocity.
Moreover, leaders should strengthen supply chain resilience by diversifying vendors and building contractual protections against cost volatility. A proactive regulatory engagement agenda will help anticipate policy shifts and influence standards for telehealth reimbursement and data governance. Talent strategies that combine clinician flexibility with centralized quality assurance will protect the therapeutic relationship while enabling scale. Finally, industry players should develop outcome-oriented metrics for membership value, linking patient experience and clinical indicators to retention and referral economics. These actions collectively enable sustainable growth while preserving the core promise of concierge medicine: superior access and personalized care.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach combining practitioner interviews, document synthesis, and scenario analysis to ensure robust and actionable conclusions
This research synthesizes primary and secondary evidence to construct a comprehensive view of the concierge medicine landscape. Primary qualitative inputs include structured interviews with practicing clinicians, practice managers, and payor representatives, complemented by observational studies of care pathways in representative practices. These firsthand perspectives were used to validate thematic trends, identify operational best practices, and reveal practitioner responses to procurement and tariff pressures. Secondary sources encompassed peer-reviewed literature on care models and chronic disease management, regulatory guidance on telehealth and data protection, and technology adoption studies relevant to remote monitoring and mobile health applications.
Analytical methods incorporated thematic coding of interview transcripts, cross-sectional comparison of service models, and scenario-based sensitivity analysis to explore tactical responses to cost and regulatory changes. Care was taken to triangulate findings across multiple data sources to reduce bias and to ensure that recommendations are grounded in observable practitioner behavior and documented policy frameworks. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions and reproducibility of analytic steps so that readers can trace how conclusions were derived and adapt the approach to bespoke market inquiries.
A synthesis of strategic priorities that reconcile patient-centric care with operational resilience and regulatory adaptability to guide executive decision-making
In conclusion, the concierge medicine sector is at an inflection point where technological enablement, demographic demand, and evolving payment structures are creating both opportunity and complexity. Providers that thoughtfully calibrate their service model-balancing hybrid and traditional delivery approaches-while designing membership tiers that reflect patient willingness to pay and clinical intensity will be best positioned to capture long-term value. Embedding robust chronic disease management, accessible diagnostics, preventive services, and comprehensive wellness programs will strengthen patient retention and clinical outcomes over time.
At the same time, external pressures such as trade policy shifts and regional regulatory divergence require practices to maintain procurement agility and regulatory foresight. Companies that invest in interoperable systems, cultivate strategic partnerships, and measure outcomes rigorously will be able to scale without eroding the personalized experience that defines concierge care. Taken together, these priorities form a pragmatic roadmap for leaders seeking to translate insights into sustainable business models and improved patient health.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative orientation to the contemporary concierge medicine environment clarifying core drivers that shape patient expectations and provider strategies
The concierge medicine sector is undergoing a period of purposeful reinvention as expectations among high-value patients, providers, and payers converge toward more personalized, outcomes-focused care. This executive summary opens by framing the contemporary landscape in which time-poor patients demand seamless access, clinicians seek sustainable practice models, and technology enables new modalities of care delivery. By articulating the core drivers-consumer preference for convenience, clinician workforce pressures, and the maturation of virtual care platforms-this introduction establishes the context for deeper analysis.
As we proceed, the narrative emphasizes how concierge models are differentiating along service scope, membership economics, and integration with broader healthcare ecosystems. The following sections synthesize structural shifts, regulatory and trade headwinds, segmentation dynamics, and regional nuances that together shape strategic options for market participants. Stakeholders will find a balanced appraisal that highlights opportunities to enhance patient value while maintaining operational and financial resilience.
How converging technological advances, demographic pressures, and payment innovations are reshaping the delivery and economics of personalized primary care
Transformations in the concierge medicine landscape are driven by converging technological, demographic, and behavioral forces that are reshaping both demand and supply. Digital triage, remote monitoring, and teleconsultation have lowered the friction for virtual-first interactions, while providers increasingly adopt hybrid practice structures that blend in-person continuity with digital touchpoints. Simultaneously, aging populations and the rising prevalence of chronic conditions have intensified demand for longitudinal care models that emphasize prevention and management over episodic interventions.
Concurrently, payment innovations and alternative membership tiers are enabling a wider set of practices to adopt concierge approaches, thereby broadening the addressable patient base beyond high-net-worth individuals. Regulatory attention to data security and interoperability imposes design constraints but also creates incentives for platform standardization and partnership. Together, these shifts create a landscape where nimble providers who integrate virtual offerings, chronic disease management protocols, and differentiated membership tiers can capture durable competitive advantage. Transitional coordination between care delivery and technology vendors will be decisive in accelerating value realization across the sector.
Assessing how changes in trade policy and tariffs create procurement cost pressure and drive strategic vendor selection and operational redesign across practices
Recent tariff dynamics affecting imported medical devices, diagnostic equipment, and certain biopharmaceutical supplies have introduced cost variability that ripples through practice operations. For concierge medicine providers that rely on a mix of in-clinic diagnostics, imaging services, and remote monitoring devices, increased import costs can elevate capital expenditures and recurring supply prices. This environment incentivizes procurement diversification and stronger supplier negotiations to protect margin integrity without compromising clinical capability.
Practices are responding by reassessing equipment lifecycles, expanding partnerships with domestic manufacturers, and selectively localizing procurement for high-utilization items. In parallel, there is a rising emphasis on optimizing clinical workflows to reduce dependence on high-cost imported consumables; expanding point-of-care testing and leveraging telehealth where clinically appropriate are examples of how operational redesign can mitigate tariff exposure. Over time, providers that embed tariff sensitivity into budgeting and vendor selection will preserve service quality while maintaining membership value propositions, and payers and employers seeking to partner with concierge providers will increasingly evaluate supply chain robustness as part of contracting criteria.
Deep segmentation insights revealing how service model, membership pricing, clinical scope, provider structure, and distribution choices determine competitive positioning
Segmentation reveals meaningful differentiation in how services are delivered, priced, and consumed, and these distinctions inform tailored competitive strategies. Practices organized by service model demonstrate divergent operational profiles: hybrid models blend traditional face-to-face continuity with telehealth touchpoints and typically concentrate on scalability and integrated care pathways, whereas traditional models emphasize in-person relationships and may prioritize bespoke patient experiences over high-volume throughput. Each approach has implications for staff mix, space utilization, and technology investment.
Membership fee tiers shape the expectation set for access and service depth. High-fee tiers commonly offer expanded care coordination, longer appointment times, and additional ancillary services, while mid and low tiers often streamline offerings while preserving core preventive and chronic care management. Service offering segmentation highlights where providers can differentiate clinically: chronic disease management encompassing cancer follow-up, cardiovascular management, and diabetes management requires sophisticated care pathways and coordination with specialists; diagnostics that incorporate imaging services and lab testing support timely decision-making; preventive care centered on annual physicals, health screenings, and immunizations underpins long-term population health; and wellness services spanning fitness planning, mental health counseling, and nutrition counseling extend care beyond pathology into sustained wellbeing. Mental health counseling itself is evolving to include both in-person therapy and teletherapy modalities, delivering accessibility and scalability.
Provider type influences organizational culture, referral patterns, and capital structure. Group practices and multi-specialty clinics often leverage scale to offer a broader set of services and invest in integrated data systems, whereas solo practitioners can differentiate through hyper-personalized relationships and flexible fee arrangements. Distribution channel choices-ranging from in-person to integrated offerings that combine clinic visits or house calls with telehealth, and fully virtual models enabled by mobile health apps, remote monitoring, and teleconsultation-determine the patient journey and the nature of ongoing engagement. Mobile health apps themselves bifurcate into disease management apps and wellness tracking apps, each serving distinct use cases that feed back into membership value and clinical outcomes. Understanding these layered segmentation axes allows leaders to align service design with target patient cohorts and operational capabilities.
Comparative regional analysis underscoring how regulatory regimes, payer structures, and cultural preferences shape adoption and scaling opportunities across major global markets
Regional dynamics materially influence adoption patterns, regulatory considerations, and partnership opportunities across key global markets. In the Americas, patient willingness to pay for convenience and continuity has fostered a mature market where private pay models and employer-sponsored concierge offerings coexist; this region also exhibits concentrated innovation in telehealth reimbursement and integrated care pilots. Europe, the Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where national health systems, private markets, and regulatory variance create pockets of rapid adoption alongside more cautious expansion; cross-border partnerships and accreditation standards inform how providers scale while adapting to local patient expectations.
The Asia-Pacific region is notable for fast adoption of digital-first solutions and an expanding middle class that seeks premium, accessible care. Provider networks in these markets often emphasize partnerships with technology platforms and insurers to broaden reach, and local regulatory evolution around telemedicine and data governance is shaping the speed and form of market entry. Across regions, cultural preferences for in-person versus virtual interactions, differential provider supply constraints, and the pace of reimbursement reform create a patchwork of strategic opportunities. Effective regional strategies therefore require nuanced market entry plans that balance standardization of core offerings with local customization of service delivery and pricing.
Critical corporate behaviors and partnerships that define market leaders, emerging disruptors, and the strategic levers that drive sustainable competitive advantage in healthcare delivery
Company-level dynamics reveal a spectrum of strategic postures from integrated multi-specialty platforms to boutique practices that emphasize high-touch relationships. Leading providers are investing in interoperable clinical platforms, advanced scheduling and patient engagement tools, and data-driven care pathways that codify best practices for chronic disease management and preventive care. Strategic partnerships with diagnostics providers and digital health vendors are increasingly common as organizations seek to expand service breadth without incurring disproportionate capital commitments.
Concurrently, newer entrants are differentiating through membership design, offering tiered access and value-added services such as in-home visits, personalized wellness coaching, and rapid diagnostic access. Talent strategies vary, with some companies centralizing clinical oversight and others enabling distributed clinician autonomy to preserve the intimacy of the physician-patient relationship. Competitive advantage is increasingly derived from the ability to demonstrate measurable improvements in patient experience and continuity of care, to operationalize data security and compliance, and to scale repeatable workflows that preserve clinical quality while managing cost. Observing competitor moves in technology adoption, alliance formation, and membership innovation provides a practical playbook for incumbents and newcomers alike.
Actionable strategic imperatives for providers to align membership design, digital infrastructure, supply resilience, and clinician models to sustain growth and quality
Industry leaders must prioritize coherent strategies that align clinical excellence with scalable operational design. This begins with a disciplined evaluation of the service model and membership tiering to ensure that offerings match target patient segments while enabling predictable revenue and capacity planning. Investing in interoperable digital infrastructure and standardized chronic disease management pathways will reduce variability in outcomes and support care coordination with specialist networks and diagnostic partners. By integrating point-of-care testing and remote monitoring where clinically justified, practices can reduce friction for patients and enhance diagnostic velocity.
Moreover, leaders should strengthen supply chain resilience by diversifying vendors and building contractual protections against cost volatility. A proactive regulatory engagement agenda will help anticipate policy shifts and influence standards for telehealth reimbursement and data governance. Talent strategies that combine clinician flexibility with centralized quality assurance will protect the therapeutic relationship while enabling scale. Finally, industry players should develop outcome-oriented metrics for membership value, linking patient experience and clinical indicators to retention and referral economics. These actions collectively enable sustainable growth while preserving the core promise of concierge medicine: superior access and personalized care.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach combining practitioner interviews, document synthesis, and scenario analysis to ensure robust and actionable conclusions
This research synthesizes primary and secondary evidence to construct a comprehensive view of the concierge medicine landscape. Primary qualitative inputs include structured interviews with practicing clinicians, practice managers, and payor representatives, complemented by observational studies of care pathways in representative practices. These firsthand perspectives were used to validate thematic trends, identify operational best practices, and reveal practitioner responses to procurement and tariff pressures. Secondary sources encompassed peer-reviewed literature on care models and chronic disease management, regulatory guidance on telehealth and data protection, and technology adoption studies relevant to remote monitoring and mobile health applications.
Analytical methods incorporated thematic coding of interview transcripts, cross-sectional comparison of service models, and scenario-based sensitivity analysis to explore tactical responses to cost and regulatory changes. Care was taken to triangulate findings across multiple data sources to reduce bias and to ensure that recommendations are grounded in observable practitioner behavior and documented policy frameworks. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions and reproducibility of analytic steps so that readers can trace how conclusions were derived and adapt the approach to bespoke market inquiries.
A synthesis of strategic priorities that reconcile patient-centric care with operational resilience and regulatory adaptability to guide executive decision-making
In conclusion, the concierge medicine sector is at an inflection point where technological enablement, demographic demand, and evolving payment structures are creating both opportunity and complexity. Providers that thoughtfully calibrate their service model-balancing hybrid and traditional delivery approaches-while designing membership tiers that reflect patient willingness to pay and clinical intensity will be best positioned to capture long-term value. Embedding robust chronic disease management, accessible diagnostics, preventive services, and comprehensive wellness programs will strengthen patient retention and clinical outcomes over time.
At the same time, external pressures such as trade policy shifts and regional regulatory divergence require practices to maintain procurement agility and regulatory foresight. Companies that invest in interoperable systems, cultivate strategic partnerships, and measure outcomes rigorously will be able to scale without eroding the personalized experience that defines concierge care. Taken together, these priorities form a pragmatic roadmap for leaders seeking to translate insights into sustainable business models and improved patient health.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-powered health monitoring wearables into VIP concierge care models to enable real-time patient insights
- 5.2. Expansion of international wellness retreats with embedded telehealth follow-up services for affluent concierge patients
- 5.3. Adoption of genomic and biomarker-based personalized preventive protocols within high-end concierge medicine programs
- 5.4. Partnerships between concierge practices and boutique mental health startups offering on-demand therapy and neurofeedback sessions
- 5.5. Implementation of direct primary care lanes integrated with chronic disease management platforms in exclusive clientele networks
- 5.6. Deployment of mobile phlebotomy and diagnostic labs to affluent homes for expedited test results in concierge medicine
- 5.7. Use of blockchain-secured patient records to enhance privacy and data interoperability for premium healthcare subscribers
- 5.8. Integration of luxury lifestyle coaching with nutrition genomics in a bundled concierge health membership for executives
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Concierge Medicine Market, by Service Offering
- 8.1. Chronic Disease Management
- 8.1.1. Cancer Follow Up
- 8.1.2. Cardiovascular Management
- 8.1.3. Diabetes Management
- 8.2. Diagnostics
- 8.2.1. Imaging Services
- 8.2.2. Lab Testing
- 8.3. Preventive Care
- 8.3.1. Annual Physicals
- 8.3.2. Health Screenings
- 8.3.3. Immunizations
- 8.4. Wellness Services
- 8.4.1. Fitness Planning
- 8.4.2. Mental Health Counseling
- 8.4.2.1. In Person Therapy
- 8.4.2.2. Teletherapy
- 8.4.3. Nutrition Counseling
- 9. Concierge Medicine Market, by Provider Type
- 9.1. Group Practice
- 9.2. Multi Specialty Clinic
- 9.3. Solo Practitioner
- 10. Concierge Medicine Market, by Service Model
- 10.1. Retainer Only
- 10.1.1. Fixed Annual Retainer
- 10.1.2. Tiered Retainer
- 10.2. Direct Primary Care
- 10.2.1. Individual Membership
- 10.2.2. Family Membership
- 10.3. Episodic Concierge Services
- 10.3.1. Travel Medicine Programs
- 10.3.2. Executive Physical Programs
- 11. Concierge Medicine Market, by Distribution Channel
- 11.1. In Person
- 11.2. Integrated
- 11.2.1. Clinic Visits Plus Telehealth
- 11.2.2. House Calls Plus Telehealth
- 11.3. Virtual
- 11.3.1. Mobile Health Apps
- 11.3.1.1. Disease Management Apps
- 11.3.1.2. Wellness Tracking Apps
- 11.3.2. Remote Monitoring
- 11.3.3. Teleconsultation
- 12. Concierge Medicine Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Concierge Medicine Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Concierge Medicine Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Alliance Homecare
- 15.3.2. Cambell Family Medicine
- 15.3.3. Castle Connolly Private Health Partners, LLC
- 15.3.4. Concierge Choice Physicians
- 15.3.5. Concierge Consultants & Cardiology
- 15.3.6. Concierge Medicine Europe s.r.o.
- 15.3.7. Crossover Health Medical Group
- 15.3.8. Destination Health
- 15.3.9. European Wellness Retreat
- 15.3.10. HealthLynked
- 15.3.11. Jupiter Medical Center
- 15.3.12. LifeScape Premier
- 15.3.13. MDVIP, LLC
- 15.3.14. PartnerMD
- 15.3.15. Peninsula Doctor
- 15.3.16. Priority Physicians, Inc.
- 15.3.17. SignatureMD, Inc.
- 15.3.18. Specialdocs Consultants LLC
- 15.3.19. Texas Medical Concierge
- 15.3.20. WellcomeMD
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
