Combat Management Systems Market by Component (Hardware, Software), System Architecture (Hybrid, Open Architecture, Proprietary), Platform, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Combat Management Systems Market was valued at USD 410.05 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 436.04 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.45%, reaching USD 676.58 million by 2032.
A concise operational primer describing why combat management systems are pivotal for maritime mission success and procurement decision-making across naval forces
Naval forces and maritime security stakeholders operate in an environment characterized by accelerating technological complexity, contested littorals, and evolving mission sets. Modern combat management systems sit at the convergence of sensors, weapons, data fusion, and human decision loops, requiring an integrated approach to architecture, platform fit, and lifecycle support. This introduction outlines the operational drivers, procurement constraints, and integration imperatives that shape how defense organizations evaluate and adopt combat management solutions.
Decision-makers must weigh interoperability, resilience, and upgradeability alongside tactical performance. As platforms evolve to incorporate unmanned systems, distributed sensors, and networked effects, combat management systems become the central node that orchestrates mission execution. The remainder of this executive summary provides a structured synthesis of landscape shifts, tariff implications, segmentation insights, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, actionable recommendations, research methods, and a concise closing assessment to support informed executive decisions.
How modular architectures, data-centric operations, and unmanned integrations are reshaping procurement preferences and operational requirements for maritime combat systems
The past five years have seen transformative shifts in the combat management landscape driven by modular design philosophies, growing demand for open interfaces, and the operational imperative to integrate unmanned assets. Hybrid system architectures that blend legacy proprietary stacks with open components have emerged as a pragmatic bridge between sustainment continuity and upgrade flexibility. At the same time, pure open architecture approaches are gaining traction where rapid third-party integration, cyber resiliency, and rapid iteration are prioritized by program offices.
Technological trends are converging with doctrinal change: distributed lethality, networked sensors, and collaborative engagement concepts require data-centric systems that can orchestrate multi-domain effects. Sensor suites are being fused more tightly with decision support and tactical data processing software, shortening the sensor-to-shooter cycle. In parallel, the industry is responding to lifecycle economics by designing systems that support incremental upgrades and software-defined capabilities, reducing the need for disruptive platform overhauls. As a result, acquisition strategies are shifting to modular procurements, increased use of integration testbeds, and contractual models that emphasize continuous capability insertion and long-term sustainment partnerships.
Assessing how tariff measures introduced through 2025 are altering supply chain strategies, procurement priorities, and industrial resilience decisions for defense integrators
Trade policy developments and tariff measures implemented through 2025 have introduced new considerations for procurement planners, integrators, and supply chain managers. Tariff-driven cost pressures can influence component sourcing decisions, accelerate localization efforts for critical subsystems, and prompt program offices to reassess vendor footprints to mitigate exposure to trade volatility. For systems that rely on specialized sensors, high-reliability communications equipment, or custom consoles, tariff actions can create procurement friction that ripples through qualification, testing, and sustainment timelines.
In response, suppliers are recalibrating supply chains to prioritize dual-source strategies and regional manufacturing nodes, thereby reducing single-country dependencies. Program managers are also placing greater emphasis on validated domestic manufacturing capability for mission-critical modules, as well as on contractual provisions that address tariff-related escalation. Importantly, these shifts are producing broader strategic implications: alliances and procurement partnerships are being weighed not only on technical merit but also on supply chain resilience, sovereign industrial base considerations, and the ability to provide long-term in-country support for deployed systems.
Integrated segmentation analysis highlighting how architecture, platform class, component composition, and application domains shape procurement and integration choices
Segmentation insights reveal where tactical prioritization and architectural choice intersect with platform demands and component-level integration. Based on System Architecture, the market is studied across Hybrid, Open Architecture, and Proprietary, which highlights the tension between legacy continuity and the need for modular, upgradeable solutions. Hybrid approaches often serve as transitional solutions that enable incremental modernization without abandoning installed bases, while open architectures accelerate third-party innovation and reduce long-term integration risk.
Based on Platform, the market is studied across Coastal Stations, Surface Vessels, and Underwater Vessels. The Surface Vessels is further studied across Aircraft Carriers, Corvettes, Destroyers, Frigates, and Offshore Patrol Vessels, reflecting the diversity of operational profiles that combat management systems must support. Large-deck platforms demand scalability and multi-domain orchestration, whereas corvettes and offshore patrol vessels prioritize compact, mission-focused suites with rapid reaction times. Underwater vessels require specialized sensor fusion and acoustic processing tailored to sub-surface environments.
Based on Component, the market is studied across Hardware and Software. The Hardware is further studied across Communication Equipment, Consoles, and Sensors. The Sensors is further studied across Electronic Warfare, Radar, and Sonar. The Software is further studied across Decision Support, Fire Control, and Tactical Data Processing, illustrating the layered nature of capability delivery where hardware performance and software algorithms jointly determine tactical effectiveness. Based on Application, the market is studied across Air Defense, Anti-Ship Warfare, Anti-Submarine Warfare, C4I, and Electronic Warfare. The C4I is further studied across Command And Control, Communications, and Intelligence, underscoring the role of integrated command layers that coordinate forces, enable secure communications, and deliver actionable intelligence for time-sensitive targeting and situational awareness.
Taken together, these segmentation axes demonstrate that effective system selection and modernization planning require an integrated view of architecture alignment, platform constraints, component interoperability, and the specific mission applications driving capability requirements.
Distinct regional priorities and industrial considerations across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine procurement approaches and capability mixes
Regional dynamics influence procurement preferences, industrial partnerships, and the configuration of support networks in ways that are often rooted in geopolitical context, industrial policy, and operational doctrine. In the Americas, procurement programs emphasize interoperability with allied systems, sustainment within domestic supply chains, and capabilities that support expeditionary operations and maritime security missions. This region’s industrial base often focuses on high-reliability components, rapid logistics chains, and integration with air and space assets to enable multi-domain operations.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits heterogeneous demand driven by a mix of legacy fleet modernization, territorial defense priorities, and expeditionary force requirements. Nations in this region frequently prioritize adaptable solutions that can be integrated across existing platforms while meeting evolving interoperability and cybersecurity standards. Collaborative procurement and industrial cooperation play a significant role in program design, with several countries favoring cooperative development to share costs and align capability roadmaps.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by a combination of large-scale fleet expansion, investments in anti-access/area denial solutions, and a strong focus on maritime domain awareness. Naval programs here emphasize scalable architectures, rapid sensor integration, and capabilities tailored to contested littorals. Regional supply chain diversification and localized production of critical subsystems are increasingly prominent as nations seek to balance capability acquisition with sovereign industrial development.
Competitive dynamics and supplier strategies that determine which integrators and technology providers will lead system deployments and sustainment partnerships
Competitive dynamics among prime integrators, specialized subsystem suppliers, and software providers are evolving as firms balance legacy program commitments with investments in modular, data-driven architectures. Established primes continue to leverage deep systems integration experience and end-to-end lifecycle offerings, while a growing cohort of mid-sized specialists and software-focused firms is pushing innovation in decision support, tactical data processing, and sensor fusion algorithms. This interplay creates opportunities for collaboration, subcontracting models, and technology transfer arrangements that can accelerate capability insertion.
Companies that prioritize open interfaces, rigorous systems engineering, and comprehensive test and evaluation capabilities are positioned to win programs that require rapid integration of third-party modules and iterative capability upgrades. Meanwhile, suppliers that can demonstrate hardened hardware for maritime environments, certified cyber protections, and proven interoperability with coalition systems will maintain competitive advantage on major platform programs. Strategic partnerships, long-term sustainment guarantees, and the ability to support complex qualification regimes remain decisive factors for procurement authorities when selecting industry partners.
Actionable steps for systems integrators and defense buyers to strengthen modularity, supply chain resilience, testing regimes, and collaborative development for sustained advantage
Industry leaders should adopt pragmatic pathways to balance immediate operational needs with strategic modernization objectives. First, embrace modularity where feasible by defining clear interface standards and allocating capability blocks to enable phased upgrades and third-party innovation. This reduces program risk and allows for rapid insertion of advanced signal processing, decision support, or electronic warfare modules without wholesale system replacement. Second, strengthen supply chain resilience by qualifying multiple suppliers for critical subsystems, investing in regional manufacturing partnerships, and incorporating contractual clauses that address tariff and trade disruptions.
Third, invest in robust testing and validation regimes that simulate contested electromagnetic and cyber environments to ensure systems perform under realistic operational stress. Fourth, prioritize human-centered design and training pathways so operators can exploit advanced automation and decision aids while retaining essential manual override capabilities. Finally, pursue collaborative development models with allies and trusted partners to share development costs, harmonize interoperability standards, and create mutually reinforcing industrial capabilities that support long-term sustainment and upgrades.
A robust research approach combining direct expert engagement, technical literature synthesis, and program-level comparative analysis to ensure actionable and validated insights
This research synthesis was constructed through a multi-pronged methodology that combined expert interviews, technical literature review, and structured analysis of program-level procurement practices. Primary insights were derived from engagements with program managers, systems engineers, and industry executives who manage integration, qualification, and sustainment of maritime combat suites. Secondary sources included open-source technical papers, white papers, and standards documentation that informed assessment of architecture trends, sensor evolutions, and software capability taxonomies.
Analytical rigor was maintained by aligning qualitative findings with documented program requirements, public procurement announcements, and validated descriptions of platform mix and component types. Comparative analysis across regions and vendor typologies helped surface differences in procurement approaches and industrial constraints. Throughout the methodology, care was taken to verify claims, triangulate viewpoints, and synthesize implications that are operationally relevant for decision-makers, program offices, and industry strategists.
A concise closing synthesis emphasizing integration, resilience, and human-centered validation as foundations for successful combat management modernization
The evolving combat management landscape demands a holistic approach that integrates architectural flexibility, platform-specific optimization, and supply chain foresight. Modernization success hinges on the ability to combine modular hardware, agile software practices, and rigorous integration testing to deliver reliable capabilities under operational stress. As force structures adapt to multi-domain threats and dispersed operations, combat management systems must not only meet immediate tactical requirements but also provide pathways for incremental enhancement and coalition interoperability.
Leaders that align acquisition strategies with industrial policy, invest in resilient supplier networks, and adopt rigorous human-centered validation will be better positioned to field systems that are both effective and sustainable. The synthesis presented here provides a strategic foundation for leaders seeking to reconcile near-term readiness with longer-term modernization goals while managing the complex interplay of technology, policy, and industrial capability.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise operational primer describing why combat management systems are pivotal for maritime mission success and procurement decision-making across naval forces
Naval forces and maritime security stakeholders operate in an environment characterized by accelerating technological complexity, contested littorals, and evolving mission sets. Modern combat management systems sit at the convergence of sensors, weapons, data fusion, and human decision loops, requiring an integrated approach to architecture, platform fit, and lifecycle support. This introduction outlines the operational drivers, procurement constraints, and integration imperatives that shape how defense organizations evaluate and adopt combat management solutions.
Decision-makers must weigh interoperability, resilience, and upgradeability alongside tactical performance. As platforms evolve to incorporate unmanned systems, distributed sensors, and networked effects, combat management systems become the central node that orchestrates mission execution. The remainder of this executive summary provides a structured synthesis of landscape shifts, tariff implications, segmentation insights, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, actionable recommendations, research methods, and a concise closing assessment to support informed executive decisions.
How modular architectures, data-centric operations, and unmanned integrations are reshaping procurement preferences and operational requirements for maritime combat systems
The past five years have seen transformative shifts in the combat management landscape driven by modular design philosophies, growing demand for open interfaces, and the operational imperative to integrate unmanned assets. Hybrid system architectures that blend legacy proprietary stacks with open components have emerged as a pragmatic bridge between sustainment continuity and upgrade flexibility. At the same time, pure open architecture approaches are gaining traction where rapid third-party integration, cyber resiliency, and rapid iteration are prioritized by program offices.
Technological trends are converging with doctrinal change: distributed lethality, networked sensors, and collaborative engagement concepts require data-centric systems that can orchestrate multi-domain effects. Sensor suites are being fused more tightly with decision support and tactical data processing software, shortening the sensor-to-shooter cycle. In parallel, the industry is responding to lifecycle economics by designing systems that support incremental upgrades and software-defined capabilities, reducing the need for disruptive platform overhauls. As a result, acquisition strategies are shifting to modular procurements, increased use of integration testbeds, and contractual models that emphasize continuous capability insertion and long-term sustainment partnerships.
Assessing how tariff measures introduced through 2025 are altering supply chain strategies, procurement priorities, and industrial resilience decisions for defense integrators
Trade policy developments and tariff measures implemented through 2025 have introduced new considerations for procurement planners, integrators, and supply chain managers. Tariff-driven cost pressures can influence component sourcing decisions, accelerate localization efforts for critical subsystems, and prompt program offices to reassess vendor footprints to mitigate exposure to trade volatility. For systems that rely on specialized sensors, high-reliability communications equipment, or custom consoles, tariff actions can create procurement friction that ripples through qualification, testing, and sustainment timelines.
In response, suppliers are recalibrating supply chains to prioritize dual-source strategies and regional manufacturing nodes, thereby reducing single-country dependencies. Program managers are also placing greater emphasis on validated domestic manufacturing capability for mission-critical modules, as well as on contractual provisions that address tariff-related escalation. Importantly, these shifts are producing broader strategic implications: alliances and procurement partnerships are being weighed not only on technical merit but also on supply chain resilience, sovereign industrial base considerations, and the ability to provide long-term in-country support for deployed systems.
Integrated segmentation analysis highlighting how architecture, platform class, component composition, and application domains shape procurement and integration choices
Segmentation insights reveal where tactical prioritization and architectural choice intersect with platform demands and component-level integration. Based on System Architecture, the market is studied across Hybrid, Open Architecture, and Proprietary, which highlights the tension between legacy continuity and the need for modular, upgradeable solutions. Hybrid approaches often serve as transitional solutions that enable incremental modernization without abandoning installed bases, while open architectures accelerate third-party innovation and reduce long-term integration risk.
Based on Platform, the market is studied across Coastal Stations, Surface Vessels, and Underwater Vessels. The Surface Vessels is further studied across Aircraft Carriers, Corvettes, Destroyers, Frigates, and Offshore Patrol Vessels, reflecting the diversity of operational profiles that combat management systems must support. Large-deck platforms demand scalability and multi-domain orchestration, whereas corvettes and offshore patrol vessels prioritize compact, mission-focused suites with rapid reaction times. Underwater vessels require specialized sensor fusion and acoustic processing tailored to sub-surface environments.
Based on Component, the market is studied across Hardware and Software. The Hardware is further studied across Communication Equipment, Consoles, and Sensors. The Sensors is further studied across Electronic Warfare, Radar, and Sonar. The Software is further studied across Decision Support, Fire Control, and Tactical Data Processing, illustrating the layered nature of capability delivery where hardware performance and software algorithms jointly determine tactical effectiveness. Based on Application, the market is studied across Air Defense, Anti-Ship Warfare, Anti-Submarine Warfare, C4I, and Electronic Warfare. The C4I is further studied across Command And Control, Communications, and Intelligence, underscoring the role of integrated command layers that coordinate forces, enable secure communications, and deliver actionable intelligence for time-sensitive targeting and situational awareness.
Taken together, these segmentation axes demonstrate that effective system selection and modernization planning require an integrated view of architecture alignment, platform constraints, component interoperability, and the specific mission applications driving capability requirements.
Distinct regional priorities and industrial considerations across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine procurement approaches and capability mixes
Regional dynamics influence procurement preferences, industrial partnerships, and the configuration of support networks in ways that are often rooted in geopolitical context, industrial policy, and operational doctrine. In the Americas, procurement programs emphasize interoperability with allied systems, sustainment within domestic supply chains, and capabilities that support expeditionary operations and maritime security missions. This region’s industrial base often focuses on high-reliability components, rapid logistics chains, and integration with air and space assets to enable multi-domain operations.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits heterogeneous demand driven by a mix of legacy fleet modernization, territorial defense priorities, and expeditionary force requirements. Nations in this region frequently prioritize adaptable solutions that can be integrated across existing platforms while meeting evolving interoperability and cybersecurity standards. Collaborative procurement and industrial cooperation play a significant role in program design, with several countries favoring cooperative development to share costs and align capability roadmaps.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by a combination of large-scale fleet expansion, investments in anti-access/area denial solutions, and a strong focus on maritime domain awareness. Naval programs here emphasize scalable architectures, rapid sensor integration, and capabilities tailored to contested littorals. Regional supply chain diversification and localized production of critical subsystems are increasingly prominent as nations seek to balance capability acquisition with sovereign industrial development.
Competitive dynamics and supplier strategies that determine which integrators and technology providers will lead system deployments and sustainment partnerships
Competitive dynamics among prime integrators, specialized subsystem suppliers, and software providers are evolving as firms balance legacy program commitments with investments in modular, data-driven architectures. Established primes continue to leverage deep systems integration experience and end-to-end lifecycle offerings, while a growing cohort of mid-sized specialists and software-focused firms is pushing innovation in decision support, tactical data processing, and sensor fusion algorithms. This interplay creates opportunities for collaboration, subcontracting models, and technology transfer arrangements that can accelerate capability insertion.
Companies that prioritize open interfaces, rigorous systems engineering, and comprehensive test and evaluation capabilities are positioned to win programs that require rapid integration of third-party modules and iterative capability upgrades. Meanwhile, suppliers that can demonstrate hardened hardware for maritime environments, certified cyber protections, and proven interoperability with coalition systems will maintain competitive advantage on major platform programs. Strategic partnerships, long-term sustainment guarantees, and the ability to support complex qualification regimes remain decisive factors for procurement authorities when selecting industry partners.
Actionable steps for systems integrators and defense buyers to strengthen modularity, supply chain resilience, testing regimes, and collaborative development for sustained advantage
Industry leaders should adopt pragmatic pathways to balance immediate operational needs with strategic modernization objectives. First, embrace modularity where feasible by defining clear interface standards and allocating capability blocks to enable phased upgrades and third-party innovation. This reduces program risk and allows for rapid insertion of advanced signal processing, decision support, or electronic warfare modules without wholesale system replacement. Second, strengthen supply chain resilience by qualifying multiple suppliers for critical subsystems, investing in regional manufacturing partnerships, and incorporating contractual clauses that address tariff and trade disruptions.
Third, invest in robust testing and validation regimes that simulate contested electromagnetic and cyber environments to ensure systems perform under realistic operational stress. Fourth, prioritize human-centered design and training pathways so operators can exploit advanced automation and decision aids while retaining essential manual override capabilities. Finally, pursue collaborative development models with allies and trusted partners to share development costs, harmonize interoperability standards, and create mutually reinforcing industrial capabilities that support long-term sustainment and upgrades.
A robust research approach combining direct expert engagement, technical literature synthesis, and program-level comparative analysis to ensure actionable and validated insights
This research synthesis was constructed through a multi-pronged methodology that combined expert interviews, technical literature review, and structured analysis of program-level procurement practices. Primary insights were derived from engagements with program managers, systems engineers, and industry executives who manage integration, qualification, and sustainment of maritime combat suites. Secondary sources included open-source technical papers, white papers, and standards documentation that informed assessment of architecture trends, sensor evolutions, and software capability taxonomies.
Analytical rigor was maintained by aligning qualitative findings with documented program requirements, public procurement announcements, and validated descriptions of platform mix and component types. Comparative analysis across regions and vendor typologies helped surface differences in procurement approaches and industrial constraints. Throughout the methodology, care was taken to verify claims, triangulate viewpoints, and synthesize implications that are operationally relevant for decision-makers, program offices, and industry strategists.
A concise closing synthesis emphasizing integration, resilience, and human-centered validation as foundations for successful combat management modernization
The evolving combat management landscape demands a holistic approach that integrates architectural flexibility, platform-specific optimization, and supply chain foresight. Modernization success hinges on the ability to combine modular hardware, agile software practices, and rigorous integration testing to deliver reliable capabilities under operational stress. As force structures adapt to multi-domain threats and dispersed operations, combat management systems must not only meet immediate tactical requirements but also provide pathways for incremental enhancement and coalition interoperability.
Leaders that align acquisition strategies with industrial policy, invest in resilient supplier networks, and adopt rigorous human-centered validation will be better positioned to field systems that are both effective and sustainable. The synthesis presented here provides a strategic foundation for leaders seeking to reconcile near-term readiness with longer-term modernization goals while managing the complex interplay of technology, policy, and industrial capability.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Implementation of artificial intelligence–driven decision support tools in combat management systems to reduce operator workload and improve threat response time
- 5.2. Adoption of secure cloud-based architectures for real-time data sharing and collaboration among distributed naval combat platforms
- 5.3. Enhancement of cyber resilience features in combat management systems to protect against advanced persistent threats in maritime operations
- 5.4. Integration of multi-domain data fusion capabilities combining air, surface, undersea, and space sensor inputs for comprehensive battlespace awareness
- 5.5. Development of open architecture standards and modular plug-and-play components to accelerate upgrades and interoperability across vessel fleets
- 5.6. Deployment of augmented reality-assisted tactical displays for bridge operators to visualize layered sensor data and threat vectors intuitively
- 5.7. Advancement of quantum-resistant encryption protocols within combat management communications to safeguard classified maritime data transmissions
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Combat Management Systems Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Communication Equipment
- 8.1.2. Consoles
- 8.1.3. Sensors
- 8.1.3.1. Electronic Warfare
- 8.1.3.2. Radar
- 8.1.3.3. Sonar
- 8.2. Software
- 8.2.1. Decision Support
- 8.2.2. Fire Control
- 8.2.3. Tactical Data Processing
- 9. Combat Management Systems Market, by System Architecture
- 9.1. Hybrid
- 9.2. Open Architecture
- 9.3. Proprietary
- 10. Combat Management Systems Market, by Platform
- 10.1. Coastal Stations
- 10.2. Surface Vessels
- 10.2.1. Aircraft Carriers
- 10.2.2. Corvettes
- 10.2.3. Destroyers
- 10.2.4. Frigates
- 10.2.5. Offshore Patrol Vessels
- 10.3. Underwater Vessels
- 11. Combat Management Systems Market, by Application
- 11.1. Air Defense
- 11.2. Anti-Ship Warfare
- 11.3. Anti-Submarine Warfare
- 11.4. Electronic Warfare
- 12. Combat Management Systems Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Combat Management Systems Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Combat Management Systems Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Aselsan A.Ş.
- 15.3.2. Atlas Elektronik
- 15.3.3. Atos SE
- 15.3.4. BAE Systems PLC
- 15.3.5. Bharat Electronics Limited
- 15.3.6. ECA Group
- 15.3.7. Elbit Systems Ltd.
- 15.3.8. General Dynamics Corp
- 15.3.9. Hanwha Group
- 15.3.10. Hensoldt AG
- 15.3.11. Israel Aerospace Industries
- 15.3.12. Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
- 15.3.13. Larsen & Toubro Ltd
- 15.3.14. Leonardo S.p.A.
- 15.3.15. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 15.3.16. Naval Group
- 15.3.17. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 15.3.18. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- 15.3.19. Rheinmetall AG
- 15.3.20. Saab AB
- 15.3.21. Safran S.A.
- 15.3.22. Terma A/S by Thrige Holding A/S
- 15.3.23. Thales Group
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
