Cloud Access Security Brokers Market by Service Type (Api Protection, Compliance Management, Data Protection), Industry Vertical (BFSI, Government, Healthcare), Organization Size, Deployment Model - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Cloud Access Security Brokers Market was valued at USD 16.41 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 19.64 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 19.84%, reaching USD 69.83 billion by 2032.
An essential primer on how modern cloud access security brokers reconcile enterprise risk management with accelerated cloud adoption and operational agility
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) have moved from a niche security control to a central component of enterprise cloud governance, serving as a critical bridge between on-premises controls and the dynamic cloud environment. As organizations accelerate cloud adoption across SaaS, IaaS and PaaS, CASBs deliver policy enforcement, data protection, and threat detection capabilities that align security posture with business agility. This introduction outlines the strategic role CASBs play in enabling secure digital transformation while highlighting the operational and policy challenges that demand sophisticated broker solutions.
Enterprises increasingly view CASBs as a strategic investment rather than a tactical tool. Beyond visibility and basic access control, modern CASBs embed advanced features such as context-aware access, integrated encryption and tokenization, and automated compliance workflows. These capabilities reduce friction for legitimate users while strengthening defenses against data exfiltration and account compromise. Consequently, security leaders must evaluate CASBs not only for functional fit but also for their capacity to integrate with identity platforms, threat intelligence feeds, and broader security operations frameworks.
In summary, CASBs have evolved into multifunctional platforms that balance security, usability, and compliance in cloud-first environments. This introduction frames the subsequent analysis by emphasizing the need for a holistic strategy that aligns technical controls, organizational policies, and vendor capabilities to mitigate risk and enable cloud innovation.
Key industry shifts driving a new era of identity-centric controls, data-centric protection, and compliance automation across hybrid and cloud-native environments
The landscape surrounding cloud access security brokers is undergoing several transformative shifts that reshape how organizations approach cloud security and governance. First, the convergence of identity-centric security models with CASB functionality is redefining access control. As a result, adaptive access decisions based on contextual signals such as device posture, user behavior and geolocation are becoming central to threat prevention strategies. This shift reduces reliance on static rules and elevates real-time orchestration across identity providers and policy engines.
Second, data-centric protection mechanisms are advancing within CASBs, with encryption and tokenization integrated more tightly into data flows to preserve confidentiality while enabling cloud-native analytics. This evolution complements threat protection capabilities that increasingly leverage behavioral analytics and machine learning to detect anomalies at scale. Together, these developments support finer-grained enforcement and faster incident response.
Third, regulatory and compliance pressures are catalyzing the adoption of compliance automation features within CASBs. Security teams are prioritizing platforms that can map controls to regulatory frameworks and generate audit-ready evidence. Finally, deployment flexibility is expanding as organizations balance public cloud adoption with hybrid and on-premises requirements, driving demand for solutions that can operate consistently across heterogeneous environments. Collectively, these shifts compel leaders to reassess vendor strategies, integration roadmaps and the organizational processes that enable effective cloud governance.
How 2025 United States tariff adjustments are reshaping procurement, supplier consolidation, and the shift toward cloud-native delivery models for security infrastructure
United States tariff policy changes announced in 2025 have introduced a set of cumulative impacts that reverberate through global technology supply chains and procurement decisions relevant to cloud security infrastructure. For organizations sourcing hardware-dependent CASB components or appliances, tariffs have elevated the total cost of ownership for on-premises and hybrid deployments, encouraging a reexamination of architecture trade-offs. Consequently, many security teams and procurement functions are prioritizing cloud-native and SaaS-delivered CASB offerings to sidestep import-related cost volatility and to accelerate time-to-value.
Beyond procurement, the tariffs contribute to strategic supplier consolidation as buyers seek to mitigate exposure to future trade policy shifts. This dynamic increases the value of vendors with broad, geographically distributed operations and local delivery options. It also heightens the importance of transparent supply chain practices, including the provenance of embedded hardware and third-party components.
Moreover, tariff-induced cost pressures influence budget allocation across security portfolios. Security leaders are reconsidering the balance between preventative investments and detection-response capabilities, often shifting incremental spend toward cloud-based threat protection and managed detection services that offer operational scalability without capital-intensive purchases. In sum, tariff changes in the United States have accelerated cloud-first procurement behaviors, reinforced supplier risk management, and prompted a reallocation of security investments toward more flexible delivery models.
Deep segmentation insights reveal how service specialization, deployment flexibility, organizational scale, and vertical-specific priorities shape CASB selection and implementation
Understanding demand across distinct segments is essential for tailoring CASB strategies and selecting solutions that align with technical and business requirements. Based on service type, the market categories include API protection, compliance management, data protection, and threat protection, with data protection further differentiated by encryption and tokenization techniques. This segmentation underscores that some buyers prioritize API-level controls to secure integrations and machine-to-machine traffic, while others emphasize compliance automation and comprehensive data protection frameworks that combine cryptographic safeguards with tokenization to protect sensitive payloads.
Considering deployment model, organizations evaluate offerings across cloud, hybrid, and on premises configurations, and within cloud deployments choices span private cloud and public cloud variants. Deployment considerations hinge on data residency, latency, integration complexity and existing infrastructure investments. Large enterprises and small and medium enterprises represent organizational size segments, each exhibiting distinct acquisition patterns: large enterprises favor deep integrations, customization and global support, while small and medium enterprises emphasize turnkey solutions, ease of management and predictable operational costs.
Industry vertical segmentation includes BFSI, government, healthcare, IT and telecom, and retail and ecommerce. Each vertical brings unique regulatory, sensitivity and traffic patterns that influence policy configuration, encryption key management, and threat detection priorities. Taken together, these segmentation dimensions inform procurement criteria, implementation roadmaps and vendor selection processes that security and procurement leaders must navigate.
Regional adoption patterns and regulatory pressures that drive differentiated CASB strategies across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics materially influence adoption patterns, regulatory expectations and vendor strategies across the CASB landscape. In the Americas, organizations often prioritize integration with large cloud providers and advanced threat analytics, driven by a combination of regulatory scrutiny and high cloud adoption rates. Procurement decisions here frequently favor solutions that can demonstrate seamless interoperability with identity platforms and established security operations tooling.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, heightened regulatory emphasis on data protection and cross-border data transfer restrictions steers buyers toward solutions offering robust encryption, tokenization and localized processing options. Vendors operating in this region must navigate a mosaic of compliance regimes and demonstrate strong data residency controls to earn enterprise trust. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid digital transformation and diverse maturity levels create a spectrum of needs: some markets demand advanced API protection and threat analytics, while others prioritize straightforward deployments and managed offerings that reduce operational burden.
Across regions, geopolitical considerations, local vendor ecosystems and talent availability shape deployment preferences and partnership models. Accordingly, vendors and buyers should adopt differentiated regional strategies that reflect local compliance requirements, channel dynamics and customer expectations in order to maximize relevance and adoption.
Strategic competitive dynamics focused on integration depth, architectural choices, managed services, and commercial flexibility that influence vendor selection and customer outcomes
Competitive dynamics in the CASB domain center on product breadth, integration depth and operational model. Leading vendors differentiate by bundling core functionality-such as API protection, data protection, compliance management and threat protection-with complementary capabilities like identity orchestration and cloud security posture management. Integration with identity providers and SIEM or SOAR platforms represents a significant table-stakes requirement for enterprise buyers seeking end-to-end visibility and streamlined incident response.
Product architecture also distinguishes vendors: those that deliver cloud-native, API-first solutions reduce deployment friction and operational overhead, whereas vendors offering hybrid or appliance-based options appeal to organizations with strict data residency or latency constraints. Vendor strategies increasingly emphasize managed services and co-managed models to address talent shortages and to accelerate time-to-value for customers that lack extensive security operations capacity.
From a commercial standpoint, subscription flexibility and transparent licensing models are decisive factors during procurement. Vendors that provide clear, consumption-based pricing and modular add-ons tend to align better with procurement cycles and budgetary constraints. Finally, strategic partnerships with cloud providers, systems integrators and managed service providers expand vendor reach and provide buyers with implementation pathways that reduce project risk and expedite adoption.
Practical, high-impact recommendations for security leaders to integrate identity-driven controls, data-centric protection, and flexible deployment strategies while strengthening operational readiness
Industry leaders must translate insight into action to maintain security posture while enabling cloud initiatives. First, prioritize identity integration as the foundation for adaptive access controls. This requires establishing consistent identity signals across cloud and on-premises systems and configuring CASB policies to leverage contextual attributes such as device health and behavioral baselines. Doing so improves risk-based access decisions and reduces false positives in threat detection.
Second, adopt a data-centric protection strategy that combines selective encryption with tokenization where appropriate. Leaders should classify high-value data flows and apply cryptographic controls that preserve analytic utility while enforcing stringent confidentiality. Alongside cryptography, implement automated compliance workflows to generate audit-ready evidence and to reduce manual overhead.
Third, embrace hybrid deployment flexibility by mapping workloads to the optimal execution environment; favor cloud-native CASB capabilities for SaaS workloads and consider hybrid or on-premises options for latency-sensitive or highly regulated assets. Additionally, develop vendor selection criteria that emphasize integration with identity and security operations tooling, transparent licensing and the availability of managed or co-managed service options. Finally, invest in operational readiness through tabletop exercises, runbooks and cross-functional governance to ensure policies translate into effective enforcement and incident response.
A multi-method research approach combining practitioner interviews, technical documentation review, and scenario analysis to produce validated and actionable CASB insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and structured primary research with rigorous secondary-source validation to ensure relevance and accuracy. Primary inputs included interviews with security leaders, architects and procurement professionals across multiple sectors, designed to capture real-world deployment challenges, procurement preferences and integration priorities. These conversations informed pattern recognition around adoption drivers, operational constraints and strategic trade-offs.
Secondary research involved a systematic review of technical literature, vendor documentation and regulatory guidance to map functional capabilities, deployment models and compliance considerations. Cross-validation steps reconciled practitioner insights with documented product features and industry trends, ensuring that conclusions reflect both operational reality and technical capability. The methodology also incorporated scenario analysis to explore how external shocks-such as tariff changes and regulatory updates-alter procurement behavior and architectural choices.
Data quality and objectivity were maintained through triangulation, anonymized respondent summaries and iterative feedback loops with domain experts. This multi-method approach produced findings that are actionable for executives and practitioners seeking to align security investments with cloud transformation objectives.
Synthesis of findings that underscore the strategic role of integrated CASB platforms in securing cloud transformation while aligning governance, operations, and procurement
The cumulative analysis highlights a clear imperative: organizations must evolve CASB adoption from point solutions to integral components of cloud security and governance frameworks. Modern demands for identity-driven access, data-centric protection and regulatory compliance require platforms that integrate deeply with identity services, embrace encryption and tokenization, and scale across hybrid landscapes. This evolution reduces risk exposure while enabling secure business initiatives that depend on cloud capabilities.
Operationalizing these insights requires coordinated investment in people, processes and technology. Security leaders should prioritize vendor integrations that reduce friction, adopt deployment models that align with data residency and latency needs, and develop governance practices that translate policy into measurable controls. Additionally, procurement teams should seek transparent commercial terms and partners that offer managed services to bridge operational capability gaps.
In closing, the future of cloud access security brokers lies in their ability to deliver cohesive protection that supports business agility while meeting regulatory and operational constraints. Organizations that adopt a strategic, integrated approach will realize stronger security posture and greater confidence as they scale cloud initiatives.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An essential primer on how modern cloud access security brokers reconcile enterprise risk management with accelerated cloud adoption and operational agility
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) have moved from a niche security control to a central component of enterprise cloud governance, serving as a critical bridge between on-premises controls and the dynamic cloud environment. As organizations accelerate cloud adoption across SaaS, IaaS and PaaS, CASBs deliver policy enforcement, data protection, and threat detection capabilities that align security posture with business agility. This introduction outlines the strategic role CASBs play in enabling secure digital transformation while highlighting the operational and policy challenges that demand sophisticated broker solutions.
Enterprises increasingly view CASBs as a strategic investment rather than a tactical tool. Beyond visibility and basic access control, modern CASBs embed advanced features such as context-aware access, integrated encryption and tokenization, and automated compliance workflows. These capabilities reduce friction for legitimate users while strengthening defenses against data exfiltration and account compromise. Consequently, security leaders must evaluate CASBs not only for functional fit but also for their capacity to integrate with identity platforms, threat intelligence feeds, and broader security operations frameworks.
In summary, CASBs have evolved into multifunctional platforms that balance security, usability, and compliance in cloud-first environments. This introduction frames the subsequent analysis by emphasizing the need for a holistic strategy that aligns technical controls, organizational policies, and vendor capabilities to mitigate risk and enable cloud innovation.
Key industry shifts driving a new era of identity-centric controls, data-centric protection, and compliance automation across hybrid and cloud-native environments
The landscape surrounding cloud access security brokers is undergoing several transformative shifts that reshape how organizations approach cloud security and governance. First, the convergence of identity-centric security models with CASB functionality is redefining access control. As a result, adaptive access decisions based on contextual signals such as device posture, user behavior and geolocation are becoming central to threat prevention strategies. This shift reduces reliance on static rules and elevates real-time orchestration across identity providers and policy engines.
Second, data-centric protection mechanisms are advancing within CASBs, with encryption and tokenization integrated more tightly into data flows to preserve confidentiality while enabling cloud-native analytics. This evolution complements threat protection capabilities that increasingly leverage behavioral analytics and machine learning to detect anomalies at scale. Together, these developments support finer-grained enforcement and faster incident response.
Third, regulatory and compliance pressures are catalyzing the adoption of compliance automation features within CASBs. Security teams are prioritizing platforms that can map controls to regulatory frameworks and generate audit-ready evidence. Finally, deployment flexibility is expanding as organizations balance public cloud adoption with hybrid and on-premises requirements, driving demand for solutions that can operate consistently across heterogeneous environments. Collectively, these shifts compel leaders to reassess vendor strategies, integration roadmaps and the organizational processes that enable effective cloud governance.
How 2025 United States tariff adjustments are reshaping procurement, supplier consolidation, and the shift toward cloud-native delivery models for security infrastructure
United States tariff policy changes announced in 2025 have introduced a set of cumulative impacts that reverberate through global technology supply chains and procurement decisions relevant to cloud security infrastructure. For organizations sourcing hardware-dependent CASB components or appliances, tariffs have elevated the total cost of ownership for on-premises and hybrid deployments, encouraging a reexamination of architecture trade-offs. Consequently, many security teams and procurement functions are prioritizing cloud-native and SaaS-delivered CASB offerings to sidestep import-related cost volatility and to accelerate time-to-value.
Beyond procurement, the tariffs contribute to strategic supplier consolidation as buyers seek to mitigate exposure to future trade policy shifts. This dynamic increases the value of vendors with broad, geographically distributed operations and local delivery options. It also heightens the importance of transparent supply chain practices, including the provenance of embedded hardware and third-party components.
Moreover, tariff-induced cost pressures influence budget allocation across security portfolios. Security leaders are reconsidering the balance between preventative investments and detection-response capabilities, often shifting incremental spend toward cloud-based threat protection and managed detection services that offer operational scalability without capital-intensive purchases. In sum, tariff changes in the United States have accelerated cloud-first procurement behaviors, reinforced supplier risk management, and prompted a reallocation of security investments toward more flexible delivery models.
Deep segmentation insights reveal how service specialization, deployment flexibility, organizational scale, and vertical-specific priorities shape CASB selection and implementation
Understanding demand across distinct segments is essential for tailoring CASB strategies and selecting solutions that align with technical and business requirements. Based on service type, the market categories include API protection, compliance management, data protection, and threat protection, with data protection further differentiated by encryption and tokenization techniques. This segmentation underscores that some buyers prioritize API-level controls to secure integrations and machine-to-machine traffic, while others emphasize compliance automation and comprehensive data protection frameworks that combine cryptographic safeguards with tokenization to protect sensitive payloads.
Considering deployment model, organizations evaluate offerings across cloud, hybrid, and on premises configurations, and within cloud deployments choices span private cloud and public cloud variants. Deployment considerations hinge on data residency, latency, integration complexity and existing infrastructure investments. Large enterprises and small and medium enterprises represent organizational size segments, each exhibiting distinct acquisition patterns: large enterprises favor deep integrations, customization and global support, while small and medium enterprises emphasize turnkey solutions, ease of management and predictable operational costs.
Industry vertical segmentation includes BFSI, government, healthcare, IT and telecom, and retail and ecommerce. Each vertical brings unique regulatory, sensitivity and traffic patterns that influence policy configuration, encryption key management, and threat detection priorities. Taken together, these segmentation dimensions inform procurement criteria, implementation roadmaps and vendor selection processes that security and procurement leaders must navigate.
Regional adoption patterns and regulatory pressures that drive differentiated CASB strategies across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics materially influence adoption patterns, regulatory expectations and vendor strategies across the CASB landscape. In the Americas, organizations often prioritize integration with large cloud providers and advanced threat analytics, driven by a combination of regulatory scrutiny and high cloud adoption rates. Procurement decisions here frequently favor solutions that can demonstrate seamless interoperability with identity platforms and established security operations tooling.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, heightened regulatory emphasis on data protection and cross-border data transfer restrictions steers buyers toward solutions offering robust encryption, tokenization and localized processing options. Vendors operating in this region must navigate a mosaic of compliance regimes and demonstrate strong data residency controls to earn enterprise trust. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid digital transformation and diverse maturity levels create a spectrum of needs: some markets demand advanced API protection and threat analytics, while others prioritize straightforward deployments and managed offerings that reduce operational burden.
Across regions, geopolitical considerations, local vendor ecosystems and talent availability shape deployment preferences and partnership models. Accordingly, vendors and buyers should adopt differentiated regional strategies that reflect local compliance requirements, channel dynamics and customer expectations in order to maximize relevance and adoption.
Strategic competitive dynamics focused on integration depth, architectural choices, managed services, and commercial flexibility that influence vendor selection and customer outcomes
Competitive dynamics in the CASB domain center on product breadth, integration depth and operational model. Leading vendors differentiate by bundling core functionality-such as API protection, data protection, compliance management and threat protection-with complementary capabilities like identity orchestration and cloud security posture management. Integration with identity providers and SIEM or SOAR platforms represents a significant table-stakes requirement for enterprise buyers seeking end-to-end visibility and streamlined incident response.
Product architecture also distinguishes vendors: those that deliver cloud-native, API-first solutions reduce deployment friction and operational overhead, whereas vendors offering hybrid or appliance-based options appeal to organizations with strict data residency or latency constraints. Vendor strategies increasingly emphasize managed services and co-managed models to address talent shortages and to accelerate time-to-value for customers that lack extensive security operations capacity.
From a commercial standpoint, subscription flexibility and transparent licensing models are decisive factors during procurement. Vendors that provide clear, consumption-based pricing and modular add-ons tend to align better with procurement cycles and budgetary constraints. Finally, strategic partnerships with cloud providers, systems integrators and managed service providers expand vendor reach and provide buyers with implementation pathways that reduce project risk and expedite adoption.
Practical, high-impact recommendations for security leaders to integrate identity-driven controls, data-centric protection, and flexible deployment strategies while strengthening operational readiness
Industry leaders must translate insight into action to maintain security posture while enabling cloud initiatives. First, prioritize identity integration as the foundation for adaptive access controls. This requires establishing consistent identity signals across cloud and on-premises systems and configuring CASB policies to leverage contextual attributes such as device health and behavioral baselines. Doing so improves risk-based access decisions and reduces false positives in threat detection.
Second, adopt a data-centric protection strategy that combines selective encryption with tokenization where appropriate. Leaders should classify high-value data flows and apply cryptographic controls that preserve analytic utility while enforcing stringent confidentiality. Alongside cryptography, implement automated compliance workflows to generate audit-ready evidence and to reduce manual overhead.
Third, embrace hybrid deployment flexibility by mapping workloads to the optimal execution environment; favor cloud-native CASB capabilities for SaaS workloads and consider hybrid or on-premises options for latency-sensitive or highly regulated assets. Additionally, develop vendor selection criteria that emphasize integration with identity and security operations tooling, transparent licensing and the availability of managed or co-managed service options. Finally, invest in operational readiness through tabletop exercises, runbooks and cross-functional governance to ensure policies translate into effective enforcement and incident response.
A multi-method research approach combining practitioner interviews, technical documentation review, and scenario analysis to produce validated and actionable CASB insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and structured primary research with rigorous secondary-source validation to ensure relevance and accuracy. Primary inputs included interviews with security leaders, architects and procurement professionals across multiple sectors, designed to capture real-world deployment challenges, procurement preferences and integration priorities. These conversations informed pattern recognition around adoption drivers, operational constraints and strategic trade-offs.
Secondary research involved a systematic review of technical literature, vendor documentation and regulatory guidance to map functional capabilities, deployment models and compliance considerations. Cross-validation steps reconciled practitioner insights with documented product features and industry trends, ensuring that conclusions reflect both operational reality and technical capability. The methodology also incorporated scenario analysis to explore how external shocks-such as tariff changes and regulatory updates-alter procurement behavior and architectural choices.
Data quality and objectivity were maintained through triangulation, anonymized respondent summaries and iterative feedback loops with domain experts. This multi-method approach produced findings that are actionable for executives and practitioners seeking to align security investments with cloud transformation objectives.
Synthesis of findings that underscore the strategic role of integrated CASB platforms in securing cloud transformation while aligning governance, operations, and procurement
The cumulative analysis highlights a clear imperative: organizations must evolve CASB adoption from point solutions to integral components of cloud security and governance frameworks. Modern demands for identity-driven access, data-centric protection and regulatory compliance require platforms that integrate deeply with identity services, embrace encryption and tokenization, and scale across hybrid landscapes. This evolution reduces risk exposure while enabling secure business initiatives that depend on cloud capabilities.
Operationalizing these insights requires coordinated investment in people, processes and technology. Security leaders should prioritize vendor integrations that reduce friction, adopt deployment models that align with data residency and latency needs, and develop governance practices that translate policy into measurable controls. Additionally, procurement teams should seek transparent commercial terms and partners that offer managed services to bridge operational capability gaps.
In closing, the future of cloud access security brokers lies in their ability to deliver cohesive protection that supports business agility while meeting regulatory and operational constraints. Organizations that adopt a strategic, integrated approach will realize stronger security posture and greater confidence as they scale cloud initiatives.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven threat detection in CASB solutions to proactively identify insider threats
- 5.2. Convergence of cloud access security brokers and SASE frameworks for unified network security
- 5.3. Adoption of zero trust network access capabilities within CASB platforms for granular policy enforcement
- 5.4. Expansion of agentless CASB approaches for seamless protection of BYOD and unmanaged devices in hybrid work environments
- 5.5. Growing demand for API security integration in CASB to safeguard cloud-native microservices and DevOps pipelines
- 5.6. Implementation of homomorphic encryption and tokenization in CASB tools to secure multi-cloud data assets
- 5.7. Increased emphasis on user behavioral analytics and UEBA features within CASB for advanced anomaly detection
- 5.8. Demand for automated compliance reporting and audit readiness in CASB to meet GDPR and CCPA requirements
- 5.9. Integration of CWPP and CASB functionalities to provide end-to-end visibility across cloud workloads and data flows
- 5.10. Deployment of CASB for IoT and edge computing scenarios to extend security beyond traditional cloud perimeters
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Cloud Access Security Brokers Market, by Service Type
- 8.1. Api Protection
- 8.2. Compliance Management
- 8.3. Data Protection
- 8.3.1. Encryption
- 8.3.2. Tokenization
- 8.4. Threat Protection
- 9. Cloud Access Security Brokers Market, by Industry Vertical
- 9.1. BFSI
- 9.2. Government
- 9.3. Healthcare
- 9.4. IT & Telecom
- 9.5. Retail & eCommerce
- 10. Cloud Access Security Brokers Market, by Organization Size
- 10.1. Large Enterprises
- 10.2. Small & Medium Enterprises
- 11. Cloud Access Security Brokers Market, by Deployment Model
- 11.1. Cloud
- 11.1.1. Private Cloud
- 11.1.2. Public Cloud
- 11.2. Hybrid
- 11.3. On Premises
- 12. Cloud Access Security Brokers Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Cloud Access Security Brokers Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Cloud Access Security Brokers Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Akamai Technologies, Inc.
- 15.3.2. Bitglass, Inc.
- 15.3.3. Broadcom Inc.
- 15.3.4. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
- 15.3.5. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 15.3.6. Cloudflare, Inc.
- 15.3.7. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
- 15.3.8. CyberArk Software Ltd.
- 15.3.9. Forcepoint LLC
- 15.3.10. Fortinet, Inc.
- 15.3.11. Google Cloud
- 15.3.12. IBM Corporation
- 15.3.13. Imperva, Inc.
- 15.3.14. Lookout, Inc.
- 15.3.15. McAfee LLC
- 15.3.16. Microsoft Corporation
- 15.3.17. Netskope, Inc.
- 15.3.18. Oracle Corporation
- 15.3.19. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
- 15.3.20. Proofpoint, Inc.
- 15.3.21. Rapid7, Inc.
- 15.3.22. Skyhigh Security
- 15.3.23. Trend Micro Incorporated
- 15.3.24. Zscaler, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
