Carbon Capture & Storage Market by Service (Capture, Monitoring & Verification, Operations & Maintenance), Technology (Oxy-Fuel Combustion, Post-Combustion, Pre-Combustion), End-Use Industry, Storage Formation - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Carbon Capture & Storage Market was valued at USD 7.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 7.73 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.91%, reaching USD 15.11 billion by 2032.
A strategic introduction outlining why integrated carbon capture and storage systems are now essential for industrial decarbonization and investor confidence
Carbon capture and storage represents a pivotal set of technologies and service models poised to reduce emissions intensity across multiple carbon-intensive sectors. As policymakers deepen decarbonization commitments and companies face increasingly stringent reporting and investor scrutiny, the industry has shifted from isolated pilot projects to integrated systems thinking that links capture units to transport infrastructure, verified storage formations, and ongoing site stewardship.
In recent years, the narrative has broadened beyond technology performance to include lifecycle accountability, cost-to-deploy considerations, and societal acceptance. Consequently, project sponsors now prioritize interoperable solutions that can scale within existing industrial footprints while meeting transparent monitoring and verification standards. This shift has increased collaboration among licensors, engineering contractors, storage specialists, and third-party verifiers, creating new commercial pathways for shared infrastructure and risk allocation.
Looking ahead, the ecosystem’s maturation will increasingly depend on clear regulatory frameworks, credible long-term liability regimes for storage, and continued advances in measurement technologies. These elements will determine how effectively capture, transportation, storage, and post-closure stewardship are coordinated to deliver durable emissions reductions while preserving operational safety and community trust.
An analysis of the converging technological, policy, and commercial shifts that are accelerating infrastructure-centric deployment of carbon capture and storage
The carbon capture and storage landscape has entered a phase defined by transformative shifts in technology maturation, policy alignment, and commercial structuring. Initially driven by demonstration projects and selective policy incentives, the market now exhibits a stronger orientation toward standardized project development pathways, bankable monitoring protocols, and cross-sector alliances that de-risk capital deployment.
Technological evolution has been notable across capture modalities, where solvent, sorbent, and process-integrated approaches are refining energy and cost performance. At the same time, advances in transport logistics and storage characterization have lowered uncertainty around reservoir selection and long-term containment. Policy mechanisms have become more sophisticated, tying financial support to measurable, auditable outcomes and encouraging shared-use pipelines and storage hubs.
As a result, stakeholders are recalibrating their strategies: industrial offtakers are pursuing hub-and-cluster models to spread fixed costs; technology providers are offering integrated service agreements that combine capture with monitoring and operations; and financiers are developing tailored instruments that reflect phased risk transfer. These convergent trends signal a transition from isolated deployments to an infrastructure-centric paradigm that promises to accelerate commercialization when regulatory clarity and permitting practices keep pace with technological capability.
A focused examination of the 2025 United States tariff implications that reshaped supply chain strategies and sourcing decisions across carbon management value chains
The introduction of new tariff measures in 2025 by the United States has introduced a consequential layer of trade policy risk for equipment manufacturers, materials suppliers, and service providers operating across supply chains for carbon management systems. Tariffs on specific components and capital goods can alter procurement calculus, affecting manufacturers who rely on cross-border supply chains for specialized membranes, turbine modifications, or modular capture units. This has prompted firms to revisit sourcing strategies and assess the trade-offs between domestic manufacturing investments and international partnerships.
In response, several stakeholders accelerated localization efforts, pursuing regional supply agreements and increased inventory buffers to mitigate lead-time effects. At the same time, engineering and construction firms sought to reoptimize project timelines to account for potential price shifts and customs uncertainties. For multinational developers, the tariff environment emphasized the need to diversify procurement risk and to evaluate total landed costs rather than headline equipment pricing alone.
Crucially, tariff-driven cost pressures have intensified interest in design-for-manufacture approaches and modularization that reduce dependence on specialty imported assemblies. Meanwhile, policy observers noted an increasing role for trade policy dialogue in bilateral climate discussions, as harmonized standards and reciprocal tariff relief on low-carbon technologies could materially influence deployment pace. Collectively, the 2025 tariffs underline how trade policy dynamics are now an integral consideration for strategic planning across the carbon capture and storage value chain.
A granular segmentation analysis revealing how service lines, distinctive capture technologies, sectoral demands, and storage formation attributes shape deployment feasibility and priorities
Segment-level insights reveal discrete opportunities and operational priorities across the service, technology, end-use, and storage formation dimensions of carbon capture and storage activity. When examining the service landscape, capture functions remain central, but monitoring and verification have grown into distinct revenue and risk management areas with specialized instrumentation and data analytics; operations and maintenance practices increasingly emphasize long-term stewardship, while transport and storage services demand coordination across commercial and regulatory interfaces.
From a technology lens, oxy-fuel combustion, post-combustion methods, and pre-combustion pathways continue to navigate performance and integration trade-offs. Post-combustion solutions are notably bifurcating between solvent-based and sorbent-based approaches, each with unique retrofit profiles and utility impacts that influence where they fit within existing industrial sites. In parallel, end-use industry dynamics shape deployment pragmatics: cement producers and iron and steel makers require capture solutions that tolerate high-temperature and clinker chemistries, chemical and petrochemical facilities pursue integration with process heat streams, oil and gas operators focus on enhanced value from CO2 for subsurface management, power generation assets prioritize minimal efficiency penalties, and refineries weigh feedstock variability against capture system flexibility.
Storage formation considerations further refine project design: basalt and mineralization pathways present a route for permanent trapping through mineral formation, coal seam storage leverages existing porosity and adsorption behavior, depleted oil and gas reservoirs offer known containment characteristics and existing infrastructure that can reduce upfront characterization needs, and saline aquifers deliver large capacity but require extensive appraisal to define injectivity and long-term integrity. Taken together, these segmentation perspectives inform which combinations of services and technologies are most viable for particular industrial contexts and regional settings, guiding investors and operators in matching technical solutions to site-specific constraints and strategic goals.
A comprehensive regional perspective explaining how policy structures, industrial clusters, and geological endowments drive differentiated deployment strategies across global regions
Regional dynamics have a decisive impact on the pace and configuration of carbon capture and storage initiatives, reflecting differences in policy frameworks, existing industrial bases, and subsurface endowments. In the Americas, a combination of industrial clusters, existing hydrocarbon infrastructure, and evolving federal incentives has fostered cluster-oriented approaches that link capture projects to shared transport corridors and storage hubs. This region’s strengths include sizable storage prospects in certain basins and a pragmatic orientation toward commercial models that can leverage existing oil and gas project experience.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a diverse mosaic where advanced regulatory systems and ambitious climate targets in parts of Europe coexist with Gulf markets that combine significant storage potential and deep industrial demand. The region’s interplay of rigorous monitoring standards and large-scale resource ownership has enabled novel public-private partnerships and state-led initiatives to accelerate hub development, particularly where policy signals support cost-sharing for first-of-a-kind projects.
Asia-Pacific demonstrates rapid industrial expansion alongside varying degrees of policy maturity, with several economies prioritizing decarbonization in hard-to-abate sectors while exploring cross-border cooperation on infrastructure. The region’s complex geography and varied subsurface characteristics encourage experimentation with a mix of saline aquifer appraisal, depleted reservoir reuse, and nascent mineralization projects. Across all three regional clusters, the optimal deployment pathway will hinge on harmonizing regulatory expectations, creating viable commercial frameworks for shared infrastructure, and aligning financing instruments with project risk profiles.
An assessment of corporate strategies showing how integrated contractors, specialized technology vendors, and storage operators are structuring offerings to capture value and manage project risks
Key company dynamics reflect a market where integrated service providers, specialized technology firms, and storage-focused operators each play distinct roles in the evolving value chain. Integrated contractors and licensors are competing to offer end-to-end packages that bundle capture equipment with engineering, procurement, and long-term operations capabilities, responding to offtaker demand for single-point accountability. Meanwhile, specialized technology firms concentrate on performance improvements for solvent and sorbent systems, membrane developments, and process optimization, bringing incremental efficiency gains that influence retrofit feasibility.
Operators with subsurface expertise are positioning to offer storage-as-a-service propositions, combining reservoir characterization, injection management, and monitoring capabilities under contractual regimes that transfer defined liabilities. Additionally, a cohort of data and sensing companies is establishing the technical backbone for high-fidelity monitoring and verification, enabling independent auditing and supporting regulatory compliance. Across these company types, successful strategies emphasize strategic partnerships, modular product designs that simplify deployment, and commercial models that align incentives across project stages, from early feasibility to long-term stewardship.
A pragmatic set of actionable recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate deployment through modular design, clustered infrastructure, and robust monitoring and policy engagement
Industry leaders should adopt an action-oriented playbook that balances technological choice, commercial structuring, and stakeholder engagement to accelerate viable carbon management pathways. First, prioritize modularity and design-for-deployment to reduce lead times and to mitigate cross-border tariff shocks by enabling localized manufacturing and assembly. Second, pursue cluster-based development models that allocate transport and storage costs across multiple offtakers to improve project bankability while preserving operational flexibility.
Third, invest in rigorous monitoring and verification capabilities early in project design to build regulatory confidence and social license; transparent data practices will reduce permitting friction and strengthen investor trust. Fourth, cultivate strategic partnerships that align the capabilities of technology providers, engineering firms, and subsurface specialists, thereby distributing technical risk and clarifying liability over a project’s lifecycle. Fifth, engage proactively with policymakers to shape clear frameworks for long-term storage liability, permitting timelines, and incentives that reward measurable outcomes. Finally, integrate scenario-based financial planning to stress-test projects against trade policy shifts, supply-chain constraints, and evolving carbon accounting standards, ensuring responsiveness to a dynamic policy and commercial environment.
A transparent explanation of the multi-source methodology combining technical literature, expert interviews, regulatory analysis, and scenario mapping to validate findings and insights
This research synthesizes publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, patent landscapes, company disclosures, and primary interviews with industry practitioners, technology developers, and subsurface specialists to construct a multidimensional view of deployment dynamics. The methodological approach balances qualitative insights from subject-matter experts with granular analysis of technology readiness, service delivery models, and regional policy frameworks. Triangulation of data sources ensures that findings reflect operational realities as well as strategic considerations relevant to investors and project developers.
Where primary interviews informed interpretation, anonymity was offered to enable frank discussion of commercial sensitivities. Technical assumptions and comparative evaluations of capture modalities were derived from peer-reviewed engineering studies and independent validation reports to maintain analytical rigor. The study also employed scenario mapping to assess how varying policy and trade environments could influence procurement and project structuring choices, with iterative peer review ensuring consistency and internal validity across thematic chapters.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the critical enablers and strategic adjustments required to translate carbon capture capabilities into scalable decarbonization solutions
In conclusion, carbon capture and storage is transitioning from fragmented demonstrations to system-level initiatives that require coordinated financing, standardized monitoring, and aligned public policy. The critical enablers of this transition include modular technology adoption, hub-and-cluster commercial models, and credible long-term stewardship frameworks that together reduce deployment risk and improve investor confidence. As supply chains adjust to new trade dynamics and tariffs, pragmatic sourcing strategies and regional manufacturing investments will further shape project feasibility.
Moreover, the alignment of industry players around interoperable standards for monitoring and verification will be essential to secure regulatory approval and societal acceptance. Stakeholders that proactively adapt to these structural dynamics-by investing in partnerships, embracing modular designs, and engaging constructively with policymakers-will be better positioned to translate technical capability into durable decarbonization outcomes. Ultimately, a coordinated approach across capture, transport, storage, and monitoring domains can unlock scalable solutions that materially reduce emissions from the world’s most challenging industrial sources.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction outlining why integrated carbon capture and storage systems are now essential for industrial decarbonization and investor confidence
Carbon capture and storage represents a pivotal set of technologies and service models poised to reduce emissions intensity across multiple carbon-intensive sectors. As policymakers deepen decarbonization commitments and companies face increasingly stringent reporting and investor scrutiny, the industry has shifted from isolated pilot projects to integrated systems thinking that links capture units to transport infrastructure, verified storage formations, and ongoing site stewardship.
In recent years, the narrative has broadened beyond technology performance to include lifecycle accountability, cost-to-deploy considerations, and societal acceptance. Consequently, project sponsors now prioritize interoperable solutions that can scale within existing industrial footprints while meeting transparent monitoring and verification standards. This shift has increased collaboration among licensors, engineering contractors, storage specialists, and third-party verifiers, creating new commercial pathways for shared infrastructure and risk allocation.
Looking ahead, the ecosystem’s maturation will increasingly depend on clear regulatory frameworks, credible long-term liability regimes for storage, and continued advances in measurement technologies. These elements will determine how effectively capture, transportation, storage, and post-closure stewardship are coordinated to deliver durable emissions reductions while preserving operational safety and community trust.
An analysis of the converging technological, policy, and commercial shifts that are accelerating infrastructure-centric deployment of carbon capture and storage
The carbon capture and storage landscape has entered a phase defined by transformative shifts in technology maturation, policy alignment, and commercial structuring. Initially driven by demonstration projects and selective policy incentives, the market now exhibits a stronger orientation toward standardized project development pathways, bankable monitoring protocols, and cross-sector alliances that de-risk capital deployment.
Technological evolution has been notable across capture modalities, where solvent, sorbent, and process-integrated approaches are refining energy and cost performance. At the same time, advances in transport logistics and storage characterization have lowered uncertainty around reservoir selection and long-term containment. Policy mechanisms have become more sophisticated, tying financial support to measurable, auditable outcomes and encouraging shared-use pipelines and storage hubs.
As a result, stakeholders are recalibrating their strategies: industrial offtakers are pursuing hub-and-cluster models to spread fixed costs; technology providers are offering integrated service agreements that combine capture with monitoring and operations; and financiers are developing tailored instruments that reflect phased risk transfer. These convergent trends signal a transition from isolated deployments to an infrastructure-centric paradigm that promises to accelerate commercialization when regulatory clarity and permitting practices keep pace with technological capability.
A focused examination of the 2025 United States tariff implications that reshaped supply chain strategies and sourcing decisions across carbon management value chains
The introduction of new tariff measures in 2025 by the United States has introduced a consequential layer of trade policy risk for equipment manufacturers, materials suppliers, and service providers operating across supply chains for carbon management systems. Tariffs on specific components and capital goods can alter procurement calculus, affecting manufacturers who rely on cross-border supply chains for specialized membranes, turbine modifications, or modular capture units. This has prompted firms to revisit sourcing strategies and assess the trade-offs between domestic manufacturing investments and international partnerships.
In response, several stakeholders accelerated localization efforts, pursuing regional supply agreements and increased inventory buffers to mitigate lead-time effects. At the same time, engineering and construction firms sought to reoptimize project timelines to account for potential price shifts and customs uncertainties. For multinational developers, the tariff environment emphasized the need to diversify procurement risk and to evaluate total landed costs rather than headline equipment pricing alone.
Crucially, tariff-driven cost pressures have intensified interest in design-for-manufacture approaches and modularization that reduce dependence on specialty imported assemblies. Meanwhile, policy observers noted an increasing role for trade policy dialogue in bilateral climate discussions, as harmonized standards and reciprocal tariff relief on low-carbon technologies could materially influence deployment pace. Collectively, the 2025 tariffs underline how trade policy dynamics are now an integral consideration for strategic planning across the carbon capture and storage value chain.
A granular segmentation analysis revealing how service lines, distinctive capture technologies, sectoral demands, and storage formation attributes shape deployment feasibility and priorities
Segment-level insights reveal discrete opportunities and operational priorities across the service, technology, end-use, and storage formation dimensions of carbon capture and storage activity. When examining the service landscape, capture functions remain central, but monitoring and verification have grown into distinct revenue and risk management areas with specialized instrumentation and data analytics; operations and maintenance practices increasingly emphasize long-term stewardship, while transport and storage services demand coordination across commercial and regulatory interfaces.
From a technology lens, oxy-fuel combustion, post-combustion methods, and pre-combustion pathways continue to navigate performance and integration trade-offs. Post-combustion solutions are notably bifurcating between solvent-based and sorbent-based approaches, each with unique retrofit profiles and utility impacts that influence where they fit within existing industrial sites. In parallel, end-use industry dynamics shape deployment pragmatics: cement producers and iron and steel makers require capture solutions that tolerate high-temperature and clinker chemistries, chemical and petrochemical facilities pursue integration with process heat streams, oil and gas operators focus on enhanced value from CO2 for subsurface management, power generation assets prioritize minimal efficiency penalties, and refineries weigh feedstock variability against capture system flexibility.
Storage formation considerations further refine project design: basalt and mineralization pathways present a route for permanent trapping through mineral formation, coal seam storage leverages existing porosity and adsorption behavior, depleted oil and gas reservoirs offer known containment characteristics and existing infrastructure that can reduce upfront characterization needs, and saline aquifers deliver large capacity but require extensive appraisal to define injectivity and long-term integrity. Taken together, these segmentation perspectives inform which combinations of services and technologies are most viable for particular industrial contexts and regional settings, guiding investors and operators in matching technical solutions to site-specific constraints and strategic goals.
A comprehensive regional perspective explaining how policy structures, industrial clusters, and geological endowments drive differentiated deployment strategies across global regions
Regional dynamics have a decisive impact on the pace and configuration of carbon capture and storage initiatives, reflecting differences in policy frameworks, existing industrial bases, and subsurface endowments. In the Americas, a combination of industrial clusters, existing hydrocarbon infrastructure, and evolving federal incentives has fostered cluster-oriented approaches that link capture projects to shared transport corridors and storage hubs. This region’s strengths include sizable storage prospects in certain basins and a pragmatic orientation toward commercial models that can leverage existing oil and gas project experience.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a diverse mosaic where advanced regulatory systems and ambitious climate targets in parts of Europe coexist with Gulf markets that combine significant storage potential and deep industrial demand. The region’s interplay of rigorous monitoring standards and large-scale resource ownership has enabled novel public-private partnerships and state-led initiatives to accelerate hub development, particularly where policy signals support cost-sharing for first-of-a-kind projects.
Asia-Pacific demonstrates rapid industrial expansion alongside varying degrees of policy maturity, with several economies prioritizing decarbonization in hard-to-abate sectors while exploring cross-border cooperation on infrastructure. The region’s complex geography and varied subsurface characteristics encourage experimentation with a mix of saline aquifer appraisal, depleted reservoir reuse, and nascent mineralization projects. Across all three regional clusters, the optimal deployment pathway will hinge on harmonizing regulatory expectations, creating viable commercial frameworks for shared infrastructure, and aligning financing instruments with project risk profiles.
An assessment of corporate strategies showing how integrated contractors, specialized technology vendors, and storage operators are structuring offerings to capture value and manage project risks
Key company dynamics reflect a market where integrated service providers, specialized technology firms, and storage-focused operators each play distinct roles in the evolving value chain. Integrated contractors and licensors are competing to offer end-to-end packages that bundle capture equipment with engineering, procurement, and long-term operations capabilities, responding to offtaker demand for single-point accountability. Meanwhile, specialized technology firms concentrate on performance improvements for solvent and sorbent systems, membrane developments, and process optimization, bringing incremental efficiency gains that influence retrofit feasibility.
Operators with subsurface expertise are positioning to offer storage-as-a-service propositions, combining reservoir characterization, injection management, and monitoring capabilities under contractual regimes that transfer defined liabilities. Additionally, a cohort of data and sensing companies is establishing the technical backbone for high-fidelity monitoring and verification, enabling independent auditing and supporting regulatory compliance. Across these company types, successful strategies emphasize strategic partnerships, modular product designs that simplify deployment, and commercial models that align incentives across project stages, from early feasibility to long-term stewardship.
A pragmatic set of actionable recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate deployment through modular design, clustered infrastructure, and robust monitoring and policy engagement
Industry leaders should adopt an action-oriented playbook that balances technological choice, commercial structuring, and stakeholder engagement to accelerate viable carbon management pathways. First, prioritize modularity and design-for-deployment to reduce lead times and to mitigate cross-border tariff shocks by enabling localized manufacturing and assembly. Second, pursue cluster-based development models that allocate transport and storage costs across multiple offtakers to improve project bankability while preserving operational flexibility.
Third, invest in rigorous monitoring and verification capabilities early in project design to build regulatory confidence and social license; transparent data practices will reduce permitting friction and strengthen investor trust. Fourth, cultivate strategic partnerships that align the capabilities of technology providers, engineering firms, and subsurface specialists, thereby distributing technical risk and clarifying liability over a project’s lifecycle. Fifth, engage proactively with policymakers to shape clear frameworks for long-term storage liability, permitting timelines, and incentives that reward measurable outcomes. Finally, integrate scenario-based financial planning to stress-test projects against trade policy shifts, supply-chain constraints, and evolving carbon accounting standards, ensuring responsiveness to a dynamic policy and commercial environment.
A transparent explanation of the multi-source methodology combining technical literature, expert interviews, regulatory analysis, and scenario mapping to validate findings and insights
This research synthesizes publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, patent landscapes, company disclosures, and primary interviews with industry practitioners, technology developers, and subsurface specialists to construct a multidimensional view of deployment dynamics. The methodological approach balances qualitative insights from subject-matter experts with granular analysis of technology readiness, service delivery models, and regional policy frameworks. Triangulation of data sources ensures that findings reflect operational realities as well as strategic considerations relevant to investors and project developers.
Where primary interviews informed interpretation, anonymity was offered to enable frank discussion of commercial sensitivities. Technical assumptions and comparative evaluations of capture modalities were derived from peer-reviewed engineering studies and independent validation reports to maintain analytical rigor. The study also employed scenario mapping to assess how varying policy and trade environments could influence procurement and project structuring choices, with iterative peer review ensuring consistency and internal validity across thematic chapters.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the critical enablers and strategic adjustments required to translate carbon capture capabilities into scalable decarbonization solutions
In conclusion, carbon capture and storage is transitioning from fragmented demonstrations to system-level initiatives that require coordinated financing, standardized monitoring, and aligned public policy. The critical enablers of this transition include modular technology adoption, hub-and-cluster commercial models, and credible long-term stewardship frameworks that together reduce deployment risk and improve investor confidence. As supply chains adjust to new trade dynamics and tariffs, pragmatic sourcing strategies and regional manufacturing investments will further shape project feasibility.
Moreover, the alignment of industry players around interoperable standards for monitoring and verification will be essential to secure regulatory approval and societal acceptance. Stakeholders that proactively adapt to these structural dynamics-by investing in partnerships, embracing modular designs, and engaging constructively with policymakers-will be better positioned to translate technical capability into durable decarbonization outcomes. Ultimately, a coordinated approach across capture, transport, storage, and monitoring domains can unlock scalable solutions that materially reduce emissions from the world’s most challenging industrial sources.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
199 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Government-led financing incentives accelerating large-scale carbon capture project deployment in industrial hubs
- 5.2. Advancements in solvent-based capture technology improving efficiency and lowering operational costs
- 5.3. Emergence of risk mitigation strategies in cross-border carbon transport and pipeline infrastructure development
- 5.4. Rising impact of international climate agreements in shaping carbon capture & storage risk frameworks
- 5.5. Development of underground saline aquifer storage capacity to secure long-term carbon sequestration
- 5.6. Emergence of carbon capture utilization in enhanced oil recovery and synthetic fuel production
- 5.7. Regulatory evolution of carbon credit markets boosting investment in measurement reporting and verification systems
- 5.8. Strategic partnerships between oil majors and technology startups to drive modular carbon capture solutions
- 5.9. Scaling cryogenic CO2 capture technologies for low‑concentration industrial off‑gas streams in chemical production
- 5.10. Integration of on‑site CO2 compression and liquefaction systems to streamline transport logistics to shared storage hubs
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by Service
- 8.1. Capture
- 8.2. Monitoring & Verification
- 8.3. Operations & Maintenance
- 8.4. Storage
- 8.5. Transport
- 9. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by Technology
- 9.1. Oxy-Fuel Combustion
- 9.2. Post-Combustion
- 9.2.1. Solvent Based
- 9.2.2. Sorbent Based
- 9.3. Pre-Combustion
- 10. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by End-Use Industry
- 10.1. Cement
- 10.2. Chemicals & Petrochemicals
- 10.3. Iron & Steel
- 10.4. Oil & Gas
- 10.5. Power Generation
- 10.6. Refining
- 11. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by Storage Formation
- 11.1. Basalt & Mineralization
- 11.2. Coal Seams
- 11.3. Depleted Oil & Gas Reservoirs
- 11.4. Saline Aquifers
- 12. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. ABB Ltd.
- 15.3.2. ArcelorMittal S.A.
- 15.3.3. Baker Hughes Company
- 15.3.4. Carbfix hf.
- 15.3.5. Carbon Clean Solutions Limited
- 15.3.6. Carbon Engineering Ltd. by Oxy Low Carbon Ventures, LLC
- 15.3.7. Chevron Corporation
- 15.3.8. Climeworks AG
- 15.3.9. COWI A/S
- 15.3.10. Eaton Corporation plc
- 15.3.11. Exxon Mobil Corporation
- 15.3.12. Fluor Corporation
- 15.3.13. GE Vernova Group
- 15.3.14. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
- 15.3.15. Hitachi, Ltd.
- 15.3.16. Honeywell International Inc.
- 15.3.17. Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.18. LanzaTech, Inc.
- 15.3.19. Linde PLC
- 15.3.20. MAN Energy Solutions SE by Volkswagen AG
- 15.3.21. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 15.3.22. PTT Exploration and Production Public Company Limited.
- 15.3.23. SAIPEM SpA
- 15.3.24. Santos Ltd.
- 15.3.25. Saudi Arabian Oil Company
- 15.3.26. Schlumberger Limited
- 15.3.27. Shell PLC
- 15.3.28. Siemens AG
- 15.3.29. Technip Energies N.V.
- 15.3.30. The EPCM Group
- 15.3.31. TotalEnergies SE
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
