Car Tracking System Market by Type (Active Car Tracking System, Passive Car Tracking System), Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Technology, Application, End User, Sales Channel, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Car Tracking System Market was valued at USD 13.87 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 15.90 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 15.60%, reaching USD 44.25 billion by 2032.
A strategic orientation to contemporary car tracking system developments and the converging technology trends that matter to fleet operators and mobility leaders
This executive summary opens with a concise orientation to contemporary car tracking systems, positioning them as a convergence of connectivity, telematics, and analytics that is reshaping mobility operations and asset protection. The introduction frames the subject through the lens of decision makers: technology officers, fleet managers, insurers, and government planners who must reconcile operational needs with regulatory, privacy, and infrastructure constraints.
The narrative establishes three foundational themes that run through the remainder of the document. First, the maturation of telematics has rendered tracking systems more than location devices by embedding performance diagnostics and behavioral analytics into vehicle life cycles. Second, market participants are negotiating new trade and tariff realities that influence supply chains and cost structures. Third, the pace of innovation is accelerating as service layers, software platforms, and sensor suites become differentiators. By outlining these themes up front, readers gain a structured vantage point from which to interpret subsequent sections and evaluate strategic options.
How advances in embedded connectivity, edge processing, and platform modularity are transforming procurement priorities and competitive dynamics in car tracking
The landscape for car tracking systems is undergoing transformative shifts driven by several converging forces that extend beyond product features to reshape business models and stakeholder relationships. Advances in embedded connectivity and edge computing are enabling devices to process telemetry locally and transmit higher‑value events, which reduces network costs and improves response times for critical applications such as vehicle recovery and emergency intervention.
Concurrently, software platforms are evolving from single‑function offerings into modular ecosystems that integrate fleet management, predictive maintenance, and driver behavior analytics. This shift is increasing the value of recurring subscription models and elevating the importance of data interoperability. At the same time, regulatory attention to data privacy and cross‑border data flows is prompting vendors to adopt stronger governance practices and to offer configurable data residency options. Collectively, these shifts are altering procurement criteria for buyers, prioritizing open standards, security certifications, and the ability to demonstrate tangible operational outcomes.
The cascading effects of the United States trade measures in 2025 on component sourcing, regional assembly strategies, and supplier contracting approaches across the tracking ecosystem
The imposition of new tariff measures in 2025 has introduced a layer of complexity for manufacturers, distributors, and integrators within the car tracking systems ecosystem. Tariffs exert pressure on component sourcing strategies, particularly for hardware elements such as GPS modules, sensors, and cellular communication chips that are commonly part of global supply chains. In response, many suppliers have accelerated supplier diversification, regionalized assembly, or sought alternative component architectures to mitigate cost exposure and maintain margin stability.
Beyond direct cost implications, tariffs are catalyzing strategic shifts in go‑to‑market approaches. Vendors with regional manufacturing or assembly capabilities are better positioned to preserve price competitiveness, while service providers are increasingly emphasizing software differentiation and managed services to protect revenue streams from hardware commoditization. Moreover, procurement teams are rethinking long‑term supplier contracts to include tariff pass‑through clauses and to strengthen contingency plans for logistical disruption. These adaptations reflect a broader trend: as trade policy evolves, resilience and flexibility in product design and supply operations become strategic priorities.
Detailed segmentation insights mapping type, component, technology, application, end user, sales channel, and distribution channel to product strategy and commercial design
A granular understanding of segmentation is essential for tailoring product roadmaps and commercial strategies across different use cases and buyer archetypes. Based on type, product designers must distinguish between active car tracking systems that provide continuous, real‑time telemetry and passive systems that capture trip data for later download; this distinction influences connectivity architecture, battery management, and service models. Based on component, the market splits into hardware, services, and software. Within hardware, GPS devices and sensors remain the physical interface with vehicles and determine installation complexity, while services encompass installation and maintenance offerings that sustain long‑term device performance and customer satisfaction. Software components range from fleet management suites to performance measurement tools and vehicle diagnostics platforms, which together create layered value propositions that shift focus from one‑time sales to recurring revenue.
From a technology perspective, buyers evaluate cellular‑based, GPS‑based, and radio frequency identification tracking systems against criteria such as coverage, latency, and power consumption, with hybrid designs increasingly common to blend strengths. Application segmentation further clarifies value: driver behavior monitoring and predictive maintenance drive safety and cost reduction, real‑time location tracking and vehicle recovery prioritize security and operational visibility, and fleet management ties these functions into workflow orchestration. End user distinctions are critical as well; government and public transport customers emphasize regulatory compliance and scale, individual consumers prioritize ease of use and affordability, insurance companies seek data that supports risk modeling and telematics discounts, and transportation and logistics businesses demand integrations with broader supply chain systems. Sales channel dynamics separate aftermarket opportunities from original equipment manufacturer (OEM) partnerships, each with distinct margin profiles and lifecycle implications, and distribution channels across offline and online routes influence installability and aftercare commitments. Together, these segmentation layers inform product feature sets, pricing strategies, service level definitions, and commercialization pathways.
How regional distinctions across the Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia Pacific shape solution design, compliance, and go to market strategies
Regional variation drives not only demand patterns but also regulatory expectations, partner ecosystems, and operational constraints. In the Americas, adoption often reflects a mix of fleet optimization goals and consumer interest in anti‑theft solutions; the region places a premium on mobile network coverage and integration with insurance telematics programs. Companies operating there must navigate federal and state privacy frameworks while leveraging mature automotive aftermarket channels for distribution and installation.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory diversity and infrastructure heterogeneity require adaptable solutions. European buyers frequently demand strict data protection measures and interoperability with national emergency response systems, while markets in the Middle East and Africa emphasize ruggedized hardware and resilient connectivity options. In the Asia‑Pacific region, rapid urbanization and expanding e‑commerce logistics create robust demand for fleet management and real‑time tracking, with a notable emphasis on cost‑effective aftermarket solutions and mobile‑first user experiences. As a result, successful market participants tailor product configurations, pricing, and partnership models to regional priorities, balancing global platform efficiencies with local customization and compliance.
Key competitive dynamics and strategic behaviors that define leadership, partnership models, and differentiation in the car tracking systems industry
Competitive dynamics in the car tracking systems space are defined by a combination of product breadth, distribution reach, and the ability to extract actionable insights from telemetry. Leading players increasingly emphasize software‑led differentiation, embedding analytics and predictive capabilities into their platforms to move beyond simple tracking toward decision support. Strategic partnerships with telecommunications providers, automotive OEMs, and logistics integrators create amplified go‑to‑market channels and offer bundled propositions that enhance customer retention.
At the same time, several market entrants focus on vertical specialization-delivering tailored solutions for insurance telematics, municipal fleets, or last‑mile logistics-thereby competing on domain expertise and service level depth. Investment in aftersales networks and certified installer programs strengthens customer adherence where physical installation and maintenance matter. Additionally, the maturation of cloud platforms and API ecosystems has lowered integration barriers, making interoperability a key competitive factor; vendors that provide open, well‑documented interfaces capture a disproportionate share of complex fleet accounts that require multi‑vendor orchestration. Finally, companies that demonstrate robust security practices and transparent data governance tend to win larger institutional contracts, where compliance and risk management drive procurement decisions.
Actionable strategic priorities and operational moves that technology vendors, fleet operators, and service providers should implement to capture value and mitigate supply chain risks
Industry leaders should adopt a multi‑pronged approach that aligns product architecture, commercial models, and operational resilience to capture long‑term value. First, prioritize platform interoperability and modular product architectures to enable seamless integration with fleet management systems, insurance platforms, and third‑party logistics solutions. By doing so, vendors can support a range of customer requirements while reducing the time and cost of bespoke integrations. Second, accelerate investment in analytics capabilities that convert raw telematics into prescriptive insights for maintenance scheduling, driver coaching, and route optimization; this capability will anchor subscription revenue and deepen customer relationships.
Third, build supply chain flexibility through diversified sourcing and regional assembly options to minimize exposure to trade disruptions and tariff shifts. Fourth, refine go‑to‑market strategies by balancing OEM partnerships with aftermarket channels; OEM integration can lock in long‑term installed bases, while a robust aftermarket program ensures access to retrofit and consumer segments. Fifth, establish transparent data governance and security certifications as commercial differentiators, communicating these commitments clearly to institutional buyers. Finally, deploy a customer success function that focuses on outcome realization, using pilot programs and evidence‑based case studies to reduce buyer friction and accelerate adoption.
A transparent research approach combining targeted primary interviews, technical literature review, and data triangulation to validate segmentation and industry hypotheses
The research underpinning this summary combines primary interviews with industry stakeholders and secondary analysis of technical literature, standards documentation, and publicly available regulatory materials to ensure comprehensive coverage and triangulation. Primary inputs include structured discussions with fleet operators, systems integrators, technology vendors, and channel partners to validate use cases, procurement criteria, and service expectations. Secondary sources focus on technical specifications, telecommunications standards, and regulatory texts relevant to data protection and cross‑border data transfer.
Quantitative inputs were cross‑checked across multiple datasets where available, and qualitative findings were synthesized through thematic analysis to surface recurring patterns in product adoption and buyer behavior. The segmentation framework was validated by mapping product capabilities to distinct buyer needs and testing hypotheses in targeted interviews. Limitations of the methodology include variable data availability across private operators and emerging markets, and the evolving nature of trade policies which may alter cost dynamics after fieldwork. To mitigate these constraints, the research includes sensitivity checks and documents key assumptions so that readers can adapt the insights to their own operating contexts.
A conclusive synthesis that underscores strategic imperatives for stakeholders to treat telematics as a data asset and build resilience into product and supply strategies
In conclusion, car tracking systems have transitioned from single‑purpose devices to integrated platforms that deliver operational visibility, safety improvements, and predictive maintenance capabilities. Technology evolution, regulatory scrutiny, and trade policy developments are collectively influencing how vendors design products, structure commercial offerings, and execute supply chain strategies. Enterprises that succeed will be those that treat telematics as a strategic data asset, invest in modular software architectures, and cultivate resilient supplier relationships.
Moving forward, stakeholders should monitor shifts in connectivity standards, prioritize data governance frameworks, and pursue partnerships that extend platform functionality into adjacent workflows such as route planning and insurance risk modeling. By aligning technological investments with measurable operational outcomes and by maintaining flexibility in sourcing and go‑to‑market approaches, organizations can both navigate uncertainty and realize tangible improvements in cost efficiency, safety, and service quality.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic orientation to contemporary car tracking system developments and the converging technology trends that matter to fleet operators and mobility leaders
This executive summary opens with a concise orientation to contemporary car tracking systems, positioning them as a convergence of connectivity, telematics, and analytics that is reshaping mobility operations and asset protection. The introduction frames the subject through the lens of decision makers: technology officers, fleet managers, insurers, and government planners who must reconcile operational needs with regulatory, privacy, and infrastructure constraints.
The narrative establishes three foundational themes that run through the remainder of the document. First, the maturation of telematics has rendered tracking systems more than location devices by embedding performance diagnostics and behavioral analytics into vehicle life cycles. Second, market participants are negotiating new trade and tariff realities that influence supply chains and cost structures. Third, the pace of innovation is accelerating as service layers, software platforms, and sensor suites become differentiators. By outlining these themes up front, readers gain a structured vantage point from which to interpret subsequent sections and evaluate strategic options.
How advances in embedded connectivity, edge processing, and platform modularity are transforming procurement priorities and competitive dynamics in car tracking
The landscape for car tracking systems is undergoing transformative shifts driven by several converging forces that extend beyond product features to reshape business models and stakeholder relationships. Advances in embedded connectivity and edge computing are enabling devices to process telemetry locally and transmit higher‑value events, which reduces network costs and improves response times for critical applications such as vehicle recovery and emergency intervention.
Concurrently, software platforms are evolving from single‑function offerings into modular ecosystems that integrate fleet management, predictive maintenance, and driver behavior analytics. This shift is increasing the value of recurring subscription models and elevating the importance of data interoperability. At the same time, regulatory attention to data privacy and cross‑border data flows is prompting vendors to adopt stronger governance practices and to offer configurable data residency options. Collectively, these shifts are altering procurement criteria for buyers, prioritizing open standards, security certifications, and the ability to demonstrate tangible operational outcomes.
The cascading effects of the United States trade measures in 2025 on component sourcing, regional assembly strategies, and supplier contracting approaches across the tracking ecosystem
The imposition of new tariff measures in 2025 has introduced a layer of complexity for manufacturers, distributors, and integrators within the car tracking systems ecosystem. Tariffs exert pressure on component sourcing strategies, particularly for hardware elements such as GPS modules, sensors, and cellular communication chips that are commonly part of global supply chains. In response, many suppliers have accelerated supplier diversification, regionalized assembly, or sought alternative component architectures to mitigate cost exposure and maintain margin stability.
Beyond direct cost implications, tariffs are catalyzing strategic shifts in go‑to‑market approaches. Vendors with regional manufacturing or assembly capabilities are better positioned to preserve price competitiveness, while service providers are increasingly emphasizing software differentiation and managed services to protect revenue streams from hardware commoditization. Moreover, procurement teams are rethinking long‑term supplier contracts to include tariff pass‑through clauses and to strengthen contingency plans for logistical disruption. These adaptations reflect a broader trend: as trade policy evolves, resilience and flexibility in product design and supply operations become strategic priorities.
Detailed segmentation insights mapping type, component, technology, application, end user, sales channel, and distribution channel to product strategy and commercial design
A granular understanding of segmentation is essential for tailoring product roadmaps and commercial strategies across different use cases and buyer archetypes. Based on type, product designers must distinguish between active car tracking systems that provide continuous, real‑time telemetry and passive systems that capture trip data for later download; this distinction influences connectivity architecture, battery management, and service models. Based on component, the market splits into hardware, services, and software. Within hardware, GPS devices and sensors remain the physical interface with vehicles and determine installation complexity, while services encompass installation and maintenance offerings that sustain long‑term device performance and customer satisfaction. Software components range from fleet management suites to performance measurement tools and vehicle diagnostics platforms, which together create layered value propositions that shift focus from one‑time sales to recurring revenue.
From a technology perspective, buyers evaluate cellular‑based, GPS‑based, and radio frequency identification tracking systems against criteria such as coverage, latency, and power consumption, with hybrid designs increasingly common to blend strengths. Application segmentation further clarifies value: driver behavior monitoring and predictive maintenance drive safety and cost reduction, real‑time location tracking and vehicle recovery prioritize security and operational visibility, and fleet management ties these functions into workflow orchestration. End user distinctions are critical as well; government and public transport customers emphasize regulatory compliance and scale, individual consumers prioritize ease of use and affordability, insurance companies seek data that supports risk modeling and telematics discounts, and transportation and logistics businesses demand integrations with broader supply chain systems. Sales channel dynamics separate aftermarket opportunities from original equipment manufacturer (OEM) partnerships, each with distinct margin profiles and lifecycle implications, and distribution channels across offline and online routes influence installability and aftercare commitments. Together, these segmentation layers inform product feature sets, pricing strategies, service level definitions, and commercialization pathways.
How regional distinctions across the Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia Pacific shape solution design, compliance, and go to market strategies
Regional variation drives not only demand patterns but also regulatory expectations, partner ecosystems, and operational constraints. In the Americas, adoption often reflects a mix of fleet optimization goals and consumer interest in anti‑theft solutions; the region places a premium on mobile network coverage and integration with insurance telematics programs. Companies operating there must navigate federal and state privacy frameworks while leveraging mature automotive aftermarket channels for distribution and installation.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory diversity and infrastructure heterogeneity require adaptable solutions. European buyers frequently demand strict data protection measures and interoperability with national emergency response systems, while markets in the Middle East and Africa emphasize ruggedized hardware and resilient connectivity options. In the Asia‑Pacific region, rapid urbanization and expanding e‑commerce logistics create robust demand for fleet management and real‑time tracking, with a notable emphasis on cost‑effective aftermarket solutions and mobile‑first user experiences. As a result, successful market participants tailor product configurations, pricing, and partnership models to regional priorities, balancing global platform efficiencies with local customization and compliance.
Key competitive dynamics and strategic behaviors that define leadership, partnership models, and differentiation in the car tracking systems industry
Competitive dynamics in the car tracking systems space are defined by a combination of product breadth, distribution reach, and the ability to extract actionable insights from telemetry. Leading players increasingly emphasize software‑led differentiation, embedding analytics and predictive capabilities into their platforms to move beyond simple tracking toward decision support. Strategic partnerships with telecommunications providers, automotive OEMs, and logistics integrators create amplified go‑to‑market channels and offer bundled propositions that enhance customer retention.
At the same time, several market entrants focus on vertical specialization-delivering tailored solutions for insurance telematics, municipal fleets, or last‑mile logistics-thereby competing on domain expertise and service level depth. Investment in aftersales networks and certified installer programs strengthens customer adherence where physical installation and maintenance matter. Additionally, the maturation of cloud platforms and API ecosystems has lowered integration barriers, making interoperability a key competitive factor; vendors that provide open, well‑documented interfaces capture a disproportionate share of complex fleet accounts that require multi‑vendor orchestration. Finally, companies that demonstrate robust security practices and transparent data governance tend to win larger institutional contracts, where compliance and risk management drive procurement decisions.
Actionable strategic priorities and operational moves that technology vendors, fleet operators, and service providers should implement to capture value and mitigate supply chain risks
Industry leaders should adopt a multi‑pronged approach that aligns product architecture, commercial models, and operational resilience to capture long‑term value. First, prioritize platform interoperability and modular product architectures to enable seamless integration with fleet management systems, insurance platforms, and third‑party logistics solutions. By doing so, vendors can support a range of customer requirements while reducing the time and cost of bespoke integrations. Second, accelerate investment in analytics capabilities that convert raw telematics into prescriptive insights for maintenance scheduling, driver coaching, and route optimization; this capability will anchor subscription revenue and deepen customer relationships.
Third, build supply chain flexibility through diversified sourcing and regional assembly options to minimize exposure to trade disruptions and tariff shifts. Fourth, refine go‑to‑market strategies by balancing OEM partnerships with aftermarket channels; OEM integration can lock in long‑term installed bases, while a robust aftermarket program ensures access to retrofit and consumer segments. Fifth, establish transparent data governance and security certifications as commercial differentiators, communicating these commitments clearly to institutional buyers. Finally, deploy a customer success function that focuses on outcome realization, using pilot programs and evidence‑based case studies to reduce buyer friction and accelerate adoption.
A transparent research approach combining targeted primary interviews, technical literature review, and data triangulation to validate segmentation and industry hypotheses
The research underpinning this summary combines primary interviews with industry stakeholders and secondary analysis of technical literature, standards documentation, and publicly available regulatory materials to ensure comprehensive coverage and triangulation. Primary inputs include structured discussions with fleet operators, systems integrators, technology vendors, and channel partners to validate use cases, procurement criteria, and service expectations. Secondary sources focus on technical specifications, telecommunications standards, and regulatory texts relevant to data protection and cross‑border data transfer.
Quantitative inputs were cross‑checked across multiple datasets where available, and qualitative findings were synthesized through thematic analysis to surface recurring patterns in product adoption and buyer behavior. The segmentation framework was validated by mapping product capabilities to distinct buyer needs and testing hypotheses in targeted interviews. Limitations of the methodology include variable data availability across private operators and emerging markets, and the evolving nature of trade policies which may alter cost dynamics after fieldwork. To mitigate these constraints, the research includes sensitivity checks and documents key assumptions so that readers can adapt the insights to their own operating contexts.
A conclusive synthesis that underscores strategic imperatives for stakeholders to treat telematics as a data asset and build resilience into product and supply strategies
In conclusion, car tracking systems have transitioned from single‑purpose devices to integrated platforms that deliver operational visibility, safety improvements, and predictive maintenance capabilities. Technology evolution, regulatory scrutiny, and trade policy developments are collectively influencing how vendors design products, structure commercial offerings, and execute supply chain strategies. Enterprises that succeed will be those that treat telematics as a strategic data asset, invest in modular software architectures, and cultivate resilient supplier relationships.
Moving forward, stakeholders should monitor shifts in connectivity standards, prioritize data governance frameworks, and pursue partnerships that extend platform functionality into adjacent workflows such as route planning and insurance risk modeling. By aligning technological investments with measurable operational outcomes and by maintaining flexibility in sourcing and go‑to‑market approaches, organizations can both navigate uncertainty and realize tangible improvements in cost efficiency, safety, and service quality.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
198 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven predictive maintenance and dynamic route optimization in fleet tracking systems
- 5.2. Adoption of 5G-enabled telematics for seamless high-speed vehicle location and status monitoring
- 5.3. Emergence of blockchain-based platforms to ensure secure and tamper-proof vehicle data exchange
- 5.4. Integration of advanced driver assistance systems data with tracking platforms for enhanced safety analytics
- 5.5. Growing implementation of geofencing and customizable alerting for regulatory compliance in fleet management
- 5.6. Rising demand for usage-based insurance telematics models leveraging real-time driving behavior metrics
- 5.7. Expansion of integrated IoT ecosystems linking vehicle tracking devices with smart city infrastructure services
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Car Tracking System Market, by Type
- 8.1. Active Car Tracking System
- 8.2. Passive Car Tracking System
- 9. Car Tracking System Market, by Component
- 9.1. Hardware
- 9.1.1. GPS Devices
- 9.1.2. Sensors
- 9.2. Services
- 9.2.1. Installation Services
- 9.2.2. Maintenance Services
- 9.3. Software
- 9.3.1. Fleet Management Software
- 9.3.2. Performance Measurement Software
- 9.3.3. Vehicle Diagnostics Software
- 10. Car Tracking System Market, by Technology
- 10.1. Cellular-Based Tracking Systems
- 10.2. GPS-Based Tracking Systems
- 10.3. Radio Frequency Identification Tracking Systems
- 11. Car Tracking System Market, by Application
- 11.1. Driver Behavior Monitoring
- 11.2. Fleet Management
- 11.3. Predictive Maintenance
- 11.4. Real-Time Location Tracking
- 11.5. Vehicle Recovery
- 12. Car Tracking System Market, by End User
- 12.1. Government & Public Transport
- 12.2. Individual Consumers
- 12.3. Insurance Companies
- 12.4. Transportation & Logistic
- 13. Car Tracking System Market, by Sales Channel
- 13.1. Aftermarket
- 13.2. Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)
- 14. Car Tracking System Market, by Distribution Channel
- 14.1. Offline
- 14.2. Online
- 15. Car Tracking System Market, by Region
- 15.1. Americas
- 15.1.1. North America
- 15.1.2. Latin America
- 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 15.2.1. Europe
- 15.2.2. Middle East
- 15.2.3. Africa
- 15.3. Asia-Pacific
- 16. Car Tracking System Market, by Group
- 16.1. ASEAN
- 16.2. GCC
- 16.3. European Union
- 16.4. BRICS
- 16.5. G7
- 16.6. NATO
- 17. Car Tracking System Market, by Country
- 17.1. United States
- 17.2. Canada
- 17.3. Mexico
- 17.4. Brazil
- 17.5. United Kingdom
- 17.6. Germany
- 17.7. France
- 17.8. Russia
- 17.9. Italy
- 17.10. Spain
- 17.11. China
- 17.12. India
- 17.13. Japan
- 17.14. Australia
- 17.15. South Korea
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 18.3. Competitive Analysis
- 18.3.1. AT&T Inc.
- 18.3.2. ATrack Technology Inc.
- 18.3.3. CalAmp Corporation
- 18.3.4. Cartrack Holdings Limited by Karooooo
- 18.3.5. Continental AG
- 18.3.6. Geotab Inc.
- 18.3.7. GPSWOX LTD.
- 18.3.8. Inseego Corp.
- 18.3.9. Laipac Technology Inc.
- 18.3.10. Lytx, Inc.
- 18.3.11. Meitrack Group
- 18.3.12. Motive Technologies, Inc.
- 18.3.13. ORBCOMM Inc.
- 18.3.14. Quartix Inc.
- 18.3.15. Queclink Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd.
- 18.3.16. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 18.3.17. Ruptela Group
- 18.3.18. Samsara Inc.
- 18.3.19. Sensata Technologies Inc.
- 18.3.20. Shenzhen Jimi IoT Co., Ltd
- 18.3.21. Sierra Wireless, Inc.
- 18.3.22. Spireon, LLC by Solera Inc.
- 18.3.23. Teletrac Navman US Ltd.
- 18.3.24. TELTONIKA TELEMATICS
- 18.3.25. TomTom N.V.
- 18.3.26. TrackingFox, Inc.
- 18.3.27. Uffizio
- 18.3.28. Verizon Communications Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
