Caps & Closure Market by Material (Composite, Metal, Plastic), Type (Cork, Flip Top, Screw), Application, End Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Caps & Closure Market was valued at USD 3.71 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.00 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.06%, reaching USD 7.43 billion by 2032.
Framing the current caps and closures environment with context on material innovation, regulatory pressures, and shifting brand and consumer priorities across sectors
The caps and closures arena is experiencing a period of rapid technical refinement and shifting commercial priorities as brands, converters, and material suppliers respond to sustainability goals, regulatory developments, and evolving consumer expectations. This introduction lays out the critical context that frames the subsequent analysis: it highlights how material science, design innovations, and supply chain disruptions are interacting to reshape decision-making across packaging value chains.
In the face of rising environmental scrutiny and heightened quality demands from end-use categories such as beverages, personal care, and pharmaceuticals, industry participants are re-evaluating legacy approaches to closure selection. Concurrently, manufacturers are prioritizing modularity and compatibility while seeking cost-effective transitions to recyclable and recycled content. These themes thread through the report, setting the stage for strategic trade-offs between performance, compliance, and brand positioning. As you proceed through the executive summary, these opening observations will help contextualize specific insights, enabling a clearer view of where to concentrate investment and operational focus over the near to medium term.
How material science breakthroughs, regulatory momentum, and sustainability imperatives are jointly reshaping design, sourcing, and commercialization strategies for caps and closures
The landscape for caps and closures is being transformed by a convergence of technological, regulatory, and commercial shifts that together are redefining competitive advantage. Advances in polymer science and metal finishing are enabling closures with enhanced barrier properties, tamper-evidence, and lightweighting potential, while digital printing and smart-label integration are opening new avenues for traceability and brand engagement. These technological changes are not isolated; they interact with broader supply chain trends and sustainability commitments to influence investment and sourcing strategies.
Moreover, regulatory shifts and consumer expectations are accelerating demand for recyclable, reusable, and compostable solutions, forcing manufacturers to innovate across the entire product lifecycle rather than solely at the point of sale. As a result, corporate sustainability targets now play a central role in R&D prioritization and procurement decisions. Meanwhile, tariff adjustments and shifting trade flows are compelling organizations to develop more geographically resilient supplier networks. Together, these dynamics are prompting strategic realignment across design, procurement, and commercialization functions, with successful players balancing speed-to-market with a disciplined approach to qualification and validation.
Assessing the 2025 United States tariff developments and their compound effects on sourcing, cost structures, compliance, and supply chain strategy for closures
Tariff policy developments in the United States during 2025 have introduced new variables into the commercial calculus for manufacturers and brand owners that source components globally. Changes in duty rates and classification practices have heightened the importance of tariff engineering, making material selection and country-of-origin planning essential components of cost management and supply chain resilience. These tariff dynamics have also amplified the need for detailed customs and regulatory expertise during new product introductions and supplier onboarding processes.
In practical terms, firms are increasingly evaluating nearshoring, dual-sourcing, and strategic inventory positioning to mitigate exposure to tariff volatility. Legal and customs teams are now collaborating more closely with procurement and R&D to ensure that material substitutions or component redesigns do not inadvertently increase duty liabilities. Additionally, tariff-driven cost pressure is prompting manufacturers to accelerate efficiency programs and pursue value-engineering initiatives that preserve functional performance while optimizing landed cost. As a consequence, commercial agreements and supplier relationships are being renegotiated with a sharper focus on total cost of ownership, compliance risk, and flexibility under evolving trade regimes.
Comprehensive segmentation framework linking materials, closure types, application subcategories, and end-use demands to reveal where technical innovation and commercial focus converge
A nuanced segmentation framework is essential to understand performance drivers, qualification requirements, and commercial pathways within the caps and closures market. Based on material, the market is studied across composite, metal, and plastic; metal is further differentiated into aluminum and tinplate, while plastic encompasses high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polypropylene (PP). Each material class brings distinct mechanical, barrier, and recyclability attributes that inform both design decisions and end-use suitability, requiring manufacturers to align material choice with regulatory demands and recyclability infrastructure.
Based on type, the market is studied across cork, flip top, screw, and snap on, and each closure type entails particular functional priorities such as resealability, tamper evidence, or pour control that affect manufacturing tolerances and validation timelines. Based on application, the market is studied across Cosmetics & Personal Care, Food & Beverage, and Pharmaceuticals; Cosmetics & Personal Care is further studied across Hair Care and Skin Care, Food & Beverage is further studied across Alcoholic Beverages, Carbonated Drinks, and Water, and Pharmaceuticals is further studied across Injectable and Oral Solid with the Oral Solid category further studied across Capsules and Tablets. These application-specific subdivisions highlight how hygiene, compatibility, and regulatory testing differ substantially across end markets. Based on end use, the market is studied across Bottled Water, Edible Oils, Soft Drinks, and Wine & Spirits, each of which places unique demands on closure performance, aesthetic expectations, and supply chain cadence. Taken together, this segmentation clarifies where technical investment is most likely to yield commercial advantage and where cross-functional coordination will be required to meet certification and quality standards.
Regional dynamics shaping materials selection, regulatory compliance, and go-to-market approaches across major global regions with diverse recycling and commercial realities
Regional dynamics exert a decisive influence on material availability, regulatory requirements, recycling infrastructure, and consumer preferences. In the Americas, regulatory focus and sustainability commitments are driving strong demand for recyclable plastics and lightweight metal solutions, while manufacturing capacity shifts are influencing sourcing patterns and lead times. Within this region, beverage and personal care categories are prioritizing closures that reconcile mass-market cost sensitivity with recyclability targets, prompting close collaboration between brands and converters on material trials and collection scheme alignment.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks and extended producer responsibility schemes are more advanced in many markets, accelerating adoption of circular packaging models and incentivizing design for disassembly. In these geographies, premium end uses such as wine and spirits emphasize heritage materials like cork alongside modern tamper-evident metal and plastic solutions, creating a bifurcated landscape of heritage aesthetics and sustainability-driven innovation. In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization and expanding middle-class consumption are increasing demand for single-serve beverages and personal care products, which places a premium on high-speed closure systems, cost-efficient materials, and local supplier agility. Collectively, these regional distinctions underscore the need for differentiated go-to-market approaches and region-specific qualification programs.
Key competitive dynamics among global manufacturers, specialized suppliers, and vertically integrated enterprises driving innovation, partnership models, and service differentiation
Competitive dynamics in the caps and closures space are shaped by a mix of global conglomerates, specialized regional producers, and vertically integrated beverage and personal care manufacturers that control significant in-house closure capacity. Leading players are investing in advanced tooling, automation, and proprietary sealing technologies to secure customer relationships and reduce per-unit variability during high-speed filling operations. In parallel, there is notable activity among specialist suppliers that focus on high-performance polymers, barrier coatings, and post-consumer recycled content solutions, which allows brand owners to access niche capabilities without compromising on scale.
Strategic partnerships between converters and resin suppliers are increasingly common, as are alliances with testing laboratories and recyclers to validate material claims and accelerate circularity roadmaps. Contract manufacturing and co-packing relationships are being leveraged by brands to manage episodic demand while maintaining rigorous quality standards. Additionally, service differentiation is emerging through digital offerings-such as traceability systems and predictive maintenance for tooling-that enhance uptime and reduce risk. Together, these competitive forces create a landscape where technical differentiation, supply chain transparency, and collaborative qualification processes determine which companies capture long-term value.
Actionable strategic initiatives for leaders to accelerate material transitions, diversify sourcing, and embed circularity and digital resilience into operations and product design
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic, high-impact actions to align product portfolios, procurement practices, and innovation pipelines with evolving market realities. First, prioritize modular design and material interchangeability to reduce qualification cycles and enable faster transitions to recycled or alternative materials when regulatory or tariff conditions change. Investing in standardized tooling interfaces and cross-compatible sealing systems reduces requalification cost and accelerates time-to-market for new SKUs.
Second, strengthen cross-functional collaboration between R&D, procurement, and regulatory affairs to ensure that material substitutions are evaluated holistically for performance, compliance, and customs implications. Third, pursue diversified sourcing strategies that blend nearshoring with vetted offshore partners to mitigate tariff exposure and logistical disruption while preserving cost flexibility. Fourth, build measurable circularity pathways by partnering with recyclers, investing in compatible materials, and transparently reporting lifecycle progress to stakeholders. Finally, leverage digital capabilities for predictive maintenance, quality analytics, and traceability to improve operational resilience and create commercial differentiation. By implementing these recommendations in a phased manner, organizations can balance short-term cost pressures with medium-term sustainability and innovation goals.
Robust mixed-methods research approach combining industry interviews, technical validation, supply chain mapping, and scenario analysis to ensure actionable and defensible conclusions
The research methodology underpinning this executive summary combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, reproducible insights. Primary research consisted of structured interviews with packaging technologists, procurement leads, and regulatory specialists across brands, converters, and testing bodies to capture experiential knowledge about material performance, qualification timelines, and tariff-related decision frameworks. Secondary research involved a disciplined review of peer-reviewed materials science literature, trade association guidance, and regulatory documentation to validate emerging technical trends and compliance requirements.
Analytical techniques included comparative material property analysis, failure-mode and effects assessments for closure types, and scenario planning to explore the operational impact of tariff shifts. Supply chain mapping was used to identify critical nodes and single-source dependencies, while stakeholder impact assessments clarified where investment would most effectively reduce risk. The methodology emphasized triangulation, ensuring that claims are supported by multiple independent data points and practical validation through industry practitioner feedback. Ethical research practices and transparency in data provenance were maintained throughout to ensure actionable and defensible conclusions.
Synthesis of strategic conclusions emphasizing cross-functional alignment, resilient sourcing, and treating closures as strategic assets to navigate regulatory and tariff complexities
In conclusion, the caps and closures sector is at an inflection point where material innovation, regional regulatory pressure, and trade policy developments are collectively shaping strategic priorities for manufacturers and brand owners. Success in this environment requires balancing immediate operational imperatives with investments that enable long-term circularity and product performance. Companies that integrate cross-functional decision-making-aligning R&D, procurement, regulatory, and commercial teams-will be better positioned to respond to tariff volatility, capitalize on material advancements, and meet evolving sustainability expectations.
Looking ahead, the most successful players will be those that treat closure design as a strategic asset rather than a commoditized input. By investing in adaptable tooling, validated recyclable materials, and resilient supplier networks, organizations can both protect margins and strengthen brand reputation. The path forward will demand disciplined project governance, clear metrics for circularity and quality, and a willingness to pursue collaborative partnerships that accelerate technical validation and infrastructure development. This conclusion synthesizes the report’s themes and provides a strategic anchor for implementation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the current caps and closures environment with context on material innovation, regulatory pressures, and shifting brand and consumer priorities across sectors
The caps and closures arena is experiencing a period of rapid technical refinement and shifting commercial priorities as brands, converters, and material suppliers respond to sustainability goals, regulatory developments, and evolving consumer expectations. This introduction lays out the critical context that frames the subsequent analysis: it highlights how material science, design innovations, and supply chain disruptions are interacting to reshape decision-making across packaging value chains.
In the face of rising environmental scrutiny and heightened quality demands from end-use categories such as beverages, personal care, and pharmaceuticals, industry participants are re-evaluating legacy approaches to closure selection. Concurrently, manufacturers are prioritizing modularity and compatibility while seeking cost-effective transitions to recyclable and recycled content. These themes thread through the report, setting the stage for strategic trade-offs between performance, compliance, and brand positioning. As you proceed through the executive summary, these opening observations will help contextualize specific insights, enabling a clearer view of where to concentrate investment and operational focus over the near to medium term.
How material science breakthroughs, regulatory momentum, and sustainability imperatives are jointly reshaping design, sourcing, and commercialization strategies for caps and closures
The landscape for caps and closures is being transformed by a convergence of technological, regulatory, and commercial shifts that together are redefining competitive advantage. Advances in polymer science and metal finishing are enabling closures with enhanced barrier properties, tamper-evidence, and lightweighting potential, while digital printing and smart-label integration are opening new avenues for traceability and brand engagement. These technological changes are not isolated; they interact with broader supply chain trends and sustainability commitments to influence investment and sourcing strategies.
Moreover, regulatory shifts and consumer expectations are accelerating demand for recyclable, reusable, and compostable solutions, forcing manufacturers to innovate across the entire product lifecycle rather than solely at the point of sale. As a result, corporate sustainability targets now play a central role in R&D prioritization and procurement decisions. Meanwhile, tariff adjustments and shifting trade flows are compelling organizations to develop more geographically resilient supplier networks. Together, these dynamics are prompting strategic realignment across design, procurement, and commercialization functions, with successful players balancing speed-to-market with a disciplined approach to qualification and validation.
Assessing the 2025 United States tariff developments and their compound effects on sourcing, cost structures, compliance, and supply chain strategy for closures
Tariff policy developments in the United States during 2025 have introduced new variables into the commercial calculus for manufacturers and brand owners that source components globally. Changes in duty rates and classification practices have heightened the importance of tariff engineering, making material selection and country-of-origin planning essential components of cost management and supply chain resilience. These tariff dynamics have also amplified the need for detailed customs and regulatory expertise during new product introductions and supplier onboarding processes.
In practical terms, firms are increasingly evaluating nearshoring, dual-sourcing, and strategic inventory positioning to mitigate exposure to tariff volatility. Legal and customs teams are now collaborating more closely with procurement and R&D to ensure that material substitutions or component redesigns do not inadvertently increase duty liabilities. Additionally, tariff-driven cost pressure is prompting manufacturers to accelerate efficiency programs and pursue value-engineering initiatives that preserve functional performance while optimizing landed cost. As a consequence, commercial agreements and supplier relationships are being renegotiated with a sharper focus on total cost of ownership, compliance risk, and flexibility under evolving trade regimes.
Comprehensive segmentation framework linking materials, closure types, application subcategories, and end-use demands to reveal where technical innovation and commercial focus converge
A nuanced segmentation framework is essential to understand performance drivers, qualification requirements, and commercial pathways within the caps and closures market. Based on material, the market is studied across composite, metal, and plastic; metal is further differentiated into aluminum and tinplate, while plastic encompasses high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polypropylene (PP). Each material class brings distinct mechanical, barrier, and recyclability attributes that inform both design decisions and end-use suitability, requiring manufacturers to align material choice with regulatory demands and recyclability infrastructure.
Based on type, the market is studied across cork, flip top, screw, and snap on, and each closure type entails particular functional priorities such as resealability, tamper evidence, or pour control that affect manufacturing tolerances and validation timelines. Based on application, the market is studied across Cosmetics & Personal Care, Food & Beverage, and Pharmaceuticals; Cosmetics & Personal Care is further studied across Hair Care and Skin Care, Food & Beverage is further studied across Alcoholic Beverages, Carbonated Drinks, and Water, and Pharmaceuticals is further studied across Injectable and Oral Solid with the Oral Solid category further studied across Capsules and Tablets. These application-specific subdivisions highlight how hygiene, compatibility, and regulatory testing differ substantially across end markets. Based on end use, the market is studied across Bottled Water, Edible Oils, Soft Drinks, and Wine & Spirits, each of which places unique demands on closure performance, aesthetic expectations, and supply chain cadence. Taken together, this segmentation clarifies where technical investment is most likely to yield commercial advantage and where cross-functional coordination will be required to meet certification and quality standards.
Regional dynamics shaping materials selection, regulatory compliance, and go-to-market approaches across major global regions with diverse recycling and commercial realities
Regional dynamics exert a decisive influence on material availability, regulatory requirements, recycling infrastructure, and consumer preferences. In the Americas, regulatory focus and sustainability commitments are driving strong demand for recyclable plastics and lightweight metal solutions, while manufacturing capacity shifts are influencing sourcing patterns and lead times. Within this region, beverage and personal care categories are prioritizing closures that reconcile mass-market cost sensitivity with recyclability targets, prompting close collaboration between brands and converters on material trials and collection scheme alignment.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks and extended producer responsibility schemes are more advanced in many markets, accelerating adoption of circular packaging models and incentivizing design for disassembly. In these geographies, premium end uses such as wine and spirits emphasize heritage materials like cork alongside modern tamper-evident metal and plastic solutions, creating a bifurcated landscape of heritage aesthetics and sustainability-driven innovation. In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization and expanding middle-class consumption are increasing demand for single-serve beverages and personal care products, which places a premium on high-speed closure systems, cost-efficient materials, and local supplier agility. Collectively, these regional distinctions underscore the need for differentiated go-to-market approaches and region-specific qualification programs.
Key competitive dynamics among global manufacturers, specialized suppliers, and vertically integrated enterprises driving innovation, partnership models, and service differentiation
Competitive dynamics in the caps and closures space are shaped by a mix of global conglomerates, specialized regional producers, and vertically integrated beverage and personal care manufacturers that control significant in-house closure capacity. Leading players are investing in advanced tooling, automation, and proprietary sealing technologies to secure customer relationships and reduce per-unit variability during high-speed filling operations. In parallel, there is notable activity among specialist suppliers that focus on high-performance polymers, barrier coatings, and post-consumer recycled content solutions, which allows brand owners to access niche capabilities without compromising on scale.
Strategic partnerships between converters and resin suppliers are increasingly common, as are alliances with testing laboratories and recyclers to validate material claims and accelerate circularity roadmaps. Contract manufacturing and co-packing relationships are being leveraged by brands to manage episodic demand while maintaining rigorous quality standards. Additionally, service differentiation is emerging through digital offerings-such as traceability systems and predictive maintenance for tooling-that enhance uptime and reduce risk. Together, these competitive forces create a landscape where technical differentiation, supply chain transparency, and collaborative qualification processes determine which companies capture long-term value.
Actionable strategic initiatives for leaders to accelerate material transitions, diversify sourcing, and embed circularity and digital resilience into operations and product design
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic, high-impact actions to align product portfolios, procurement practices, and innovation pipelines with evolving market realities. First, prioritize modular design and material interchangeability to reduce qualification cycles and enable faster transitions to recycled or alternative materials when regulatory or tariff conditions change. Investing in standardized tooling interfaces and cross-compatible sealing systems reduces requalification cost and accelerates time-to-market for new SKUs.
Second, strengthen cross-functional collaboration between R&D, procurement, and regulatory affairs to ensure that material substitutions are evaluated holistically for performance, compliance, and customs implications. Third, pursue diversified sourcing strategies that blend nearshoring with vetted offshore partners to mitigate tariff exposure and logistical disruption while preserving cost flexibility. Fourth, build measurable circularity pathways by partnering with recyclers, investing in compatible materials, and transparently reporting lifecycle progress to stakeholders. Finally, leverage digital capabilities for predictive maintenance, quality analytics, and traceability to improve operational resilience and create commercial differentiation. By implementing these recommendations in a phased manner, organizations can balance short-term cost pressures with medium-term sustainability and innovation goals.
Robust mixed-methods research approach combining industry interviews, technical validation, supply chain mapping, and scenario analysis to ensure actionable and defensible conclusions
The research methodology underpinning this executive summary combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, reproducible insights. Primary research consisted of structured interviews with packaging technologists, procurement leads, and regulatory specialists across brands, converters, and testing bodies to capture experiential knowledge about material performance, qualification timelines, and tariff-related decision frameworks. Secondary research involved a disciplined review of peer-reviewed materials science literature, trade association guidance, and regulatory documentation to validate emerging technical trends and compliance requirements.
Analytical techniques included comparative material property analysis, failure-mode and effects assessments for closure types, and scenario planning to explore the operational impact of tariff shifts. Supply chain mapping was used to identify critical nodes and single-source dependencies, while stakeholder impact assessments clarified where investment would most effectively reduce risk. The methodology emphasized triangulation, ensuring that claims are supported by multiple independent data points and practical validation through industry practitioner feedback. Ethical research practices and transparency in data provenance were maintained throughout to ensure actionable and defensible conclusions.
Synthesis of strategic conclusions emphasizing cross-functional alignment, resilient sourcing, and treating closures as strategic assets to navigate regulatory and tariff complexities
In conclusion, the caps and closures sector is at an inflection point where material innovation, regional regulatory pressure, and trade policy developments are collectively shaping strategic priorities for manufacturers and brand owners. Success in this environment requires balancing immediate operational imperatives with investments that enable long-term circularity and product performance. Companies that integrate cross-functional decision-making-aligning R&D, procurement, regulatory, and commercial teams-will be better positioned to respond to tariff volatility, capitalize on material advancements, and meet evolving sustainability expectations.
Looking ahead, the most successful players will be those that treat closure design as a strategic asset rather than a commoditized input. By investing in adaptable tooling, validated recyclable materials, and resilient supplier networks, organizations can both protect margins and strengthen brand reputation. The path forward will demand disciplined project governance, clear metrics for circularity and quality, and a willingness to pursue collaborative partnerships that accelerate technical validation and infrastructure development. This conclusion synthesizes the report’s themes and provides a strategic anchor for implementation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
189 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Increasing adoption of biodegradable screw caps in beverage packaging to reduce plastic waste
- 5.2. Development of antimicrobial closures for pharmaceutical vials to enhance patient safety and shelf life
- 5.3. Integration of smart caps with NFC technology for real time supply chain tracking in food industry
- 5.4. Surge in demand for child resistant caps in consumer chemicals and over the counter medicine packaging
- 5.5. Shift towards mono material closures to improve recyclability in the global packaging economy
- 5.6. Customization of closure tamper indicators leveraging laser scoring for brand differentiation and authenticity
- 5.7. Expansion of aseptic closure solutions for ready to drink dairy beverages under stringent hygiene regulations
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Caps & Closure Market, by Material
- 8.1. Composite
- 8.2. Metal
- 8.2.1. Aluminum
- 8.2.2. Tinplate
- 8.3. Plastic
- 8.3.1. High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE)
- 8.3.2. Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
- 8.3.3. Polypropylene (PP)
- 9. Caps & Closure Market, by Type
- 9.1. Cork
- 9.2. Flip Top
- 9.3. Screw
- 9.4. Snap On
- 10. Caps & Closure Market, by Application
- 10.1. Cosmetics & Personal Care
- 10.1.1. Hair Care
- 10.1.2. Skin Care
- 10.2. Food & Beverage
- 10.2.1. Alcoholic Beverages
- 10.2.2. Carbonated Drinks
- 10.2.3. Water
- 10.3. Pharmaceuticals
- 10.3.1. Injectable
- 10.3.2. Oral Solid
- 10.3.2.1. Capsules
- 10.3.2.2. Tablets
- 11. Caps & Closure Market, by End Use
- 11.1. Bottled Water
- 11.2. Edible Oils
- 11.3. Soft Drinks
- 11.4. Wine & Spirits
- 12. Caps & Closure Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Caps & Closure Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Caps & Closure Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Albea SA.
- 15.3.2. Alpla Holdings GmbH
- 15.3.3. Amcor Ltd.
- 15.3.4. AptarGroup Inc.
- 15.3.5. BERICAP Holding GmbH
- 15.3.6. Berlin Packaging UK
- 15.3.7. Berry Global, Inc.
- 15.3.8. Blue Ocean Closures
- 15.3.9. Borealis AG
- 15.3.10. Caps and Closures Pty Ltd
- 15.3.11. Chemco Group
- 15.3.12. Closure Systems International Inc.
- 15.3.13. Crown Holdings, Inc.
- 15.3.14. Duravant LLC
- 15.3.15. Hoffer Plastics Corporation
- 15.3.16. Jokey Group
- 15.3.17. MOCAP, LLC
- 15.3.18. MRP Solutions
- 15.3.19. O.Berk Company, LLC
- 15.3.20. Pact Group Holdings Ltd.
- 15.3.21. Phoenix Closures, Inc. by Sonoco Products Company
- 15.3.22. Silgan Holdings Inc.
- 15.3.23. Tetra Laval International S.A.
- 15.3.24. TotalEnergies SE
- 15.3.25. United Caps Luxembourg S.A.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
