Caprolactam Market by Form (Liquid, Solid), Grade (Industrial, Specialty, Technical), Technology, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Caprolactam Market was valued at USD 15.34 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 16.12 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.62%, reaching USD 23.76 billion by 2032.
A clear, concise introduction that situates caprolactam within global chemical value chains and highlights its strategic importance to downstream industries
Caprolactam is a foundational intermediate in the production of nylon-6 and a critical input for diverse downstream applications that range from automotive components to high-performance engineering plastics. Its role as both a feedstock and an enabler of polymer properties places it at the intersection of commodity chemical manufacturing and advanced materials engineering. Over recent years, evolving feedstock economics, process technology improvements, and shifting regulatory and sustainability expectations have amplified the strategic importance of caprolactam in corporate planning and national industrial policy.
Understanding caprolactam requires attention to the entire value chain, including upstream raw material sourcing, process pathways such as the cyclohexanone route and phenol-based alternatives, and downstream conversion into fibers, films, and molded components. These linkages determine cost exposure, supply risk, and the potential for differentiation through specialty grades or technical formulations. As firms evaluate investment and sourcing decisions, they must balance near-term supply continuity with longer-term transitions toward lower-carbon production pathways and circularity initiatives.
This introductory perspective frames the subsequent analysis by highlighting the chemical’s functional attributes, the diversity of end uses it supports, and the strategic trade-offs companies face when optimizing production footprint, contractual frameworks, and product portfolios. It also sets expectations that policy shifts and technological advances will continue to reshape competitive dynamics across regions and along the supply chain.
Transformative shifts reshaping caprolactam supply chains driven by sustainability mandates technological innovation and evolving feedstock economics
The caprolactam landscape is undergoing several transformative shifts that will influence supply, demand, and strategic positioning across the value chain. First, sustainability imperatives are accelerating investments in lower-emission production pathways and feedstock diversification. Producers are increasingly evaluating carbon intensity across upstream processes and considering electrification, heat integration, and alternative hydrogen sources to reduce lifecycle emissions. These initiatives are influencing capital allocation decisions and priorities for retrofit versus greenfield projects.
Second, technological innovation in both process chemistry and catalyst design is enhancing yield and impurity control, enabling producers to offer differentiated product grades that meet stringent performance or regulatory standards. Improvements in process economics for cyclohexanone-route technologies and refinements in solvent recovery and wastewater treatment are lowering operating costs and environmental footprints simultaneously. Consequently, incumbents with technical depth can create margins through specialty grades and tailored formulations for demanding applications.
Third, supply chain resiliency is becoming a core competency as geopolitical tensions and trade policy shifts create episodic disruptions. Companies are re-evaluating sourcing strategies, considering flexible offtake arrangements, and expanding regional manufacturing capacity to shorten lead times. Finally, downstream demand patterns are shifting as automotive electrification, evolving textile sustainability expectations, and growth in engineered plastics for consumer electronics change product specifications and volumes. Together, these forces are prompting a strategic realignment that rewards agility, technical innovation, and proactive regulatory engagement.
Assessment of the cumulative implications of recent and proposed United States tariff measures on caprolactam trade flows and sourcing dynamics
United States tariff measures announced or implemented in recent policy cycles have exerted a compound effect on caprolactam trade dynamics, influencing sourcing decisions, cost structures, and the redistribution of supply across regions. Tariff adjustments have increased the premium on secure, near-shore supply options and accelerated conversations about reshoring and regional integration. As a result, procurement teams are recalibrating long-term supplier portfolios to manage tariff exposure and to maintain continuity in feedstock availability.
Tariffs have also affected downstream manufacturers differently based on their integration level and product mix. Vertically integrated producers with captive upstream assets have had greater insulation from tariff volatility and can leverage internal transfers to smooth cost pass-throughs. Independent converters and specialty producers that rely heavily on imported intermediates have faced margin compression where tariff levels became a significant component of landed cost. This dynamic prompted contract renegotiations and the exploration of alternate inputs or process modifications to preserve competitive positioning.
In parallel, trade measures have catalyzed investment in logistical capabilities and customs expertise as firms seek to optimize tariff classifications, duty drawback opportunities, and free-trade zone utilization. The cumulative impact has been an increase in operational complexity and a premium on agility, as tariff-induced cost changes are rarely uniform across subsegments or timeframes. Stakeholders are responding by strengthening scenario planning, stress-testing supply routes, and prioritizing supplier relationships that offer flexibility and shared risk mitigation approaches.
Segment-level perspectives revealing application form grade and process distinctions that determine demand patterns and value capture across the value chain
Segment-level dynamics in the caprolactam ecosystem reveal distinct demand drivers and risk profiles across application, form, grade, and technology distinctions. Based on Application, market is studied across Automotive, Carpets, Engineering Plastics, Films, and Textiles. The Engineering Plastics is further studied across Automotive Components, Consumer Goods, and Electrical & Electronics. Each application imposes different purity, pelletization, and additive requirements, creating opportunities for premiumization in high-performance niches while compressing margins in commoditized fiber markets.
Based on Form, market is studied across Liquid and Solid. Liquid intermediates tend to favor integrated polymerization sites and specialty downstream processes, whereas solid forms facilitate global trading and long-term storage strategies. Based on Grade, market is studied across Industrial, Specialty, and Technical. Industrial grades typically meet broad spec requirements for high-volume textile and carpet applications, while specialty and technical grades command higher value by addressing rigorous mechanical, thermal, or regulatory standards for engineering plastics and films.
Based on Technology, market is studied across Cyclohexanone Process and Phenol Process. The cyclohexanone route remains dominant in many regions due to established infrastructure and feedstock compatibility, but phenol-route variations offer pathways to different cost and impurity profiles, which can be advantageous for certain high-end applications. Understanding how these segmentation vectors interact is essential for manufacturers and buyers seeking to align product development, sourcing strategies, and investment priorities with evolving downstream requirements and environmental constraints.
Regional dynamics and competitive positioning across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia-Pacific that influence caprolactam production and consumption
Regional patterns in production capability, feedstock access, regulatory context, and downstream demand shape the competitive landscape for caprolactam across the major global regions. In the Americas, integrated chemical complexes and proximity to automotive and textile converters create strong interdependencies, with logistics and energy costs playing a significant role in competitiveness. Policy incentives and growing interest in localized supply chains have encouraged investments aimed at reducing import dependence and shortening lead times to key converters.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, stringent environmental regulation, recycling mandates, and commitments to decarbonization are influencing plant operations and capital investment priorities. Producers in this region face higher compliance costs but also enjoy demand for differentiated low-carbon and certified products, which can command price premiums in certain supply chains. The presence of technology providers and engineering firms supports decarbonization retrofits and process optimization projects.
Asia-Pacific remains the largest production and consumption hub, underpinned by dense downstream manufacturing clusters, integrated petrochemical complexes, and a broad range of upstream feedstock sources. Competitive energy pricing in some economies and proximity to major textile and engineering plastics manufacturers sustain high throughput volumes. Across all regions, the interplay between regulatory pressures, trade policy, and customer specification trends determines which investments and strategic moves will yield the greatest long-term advantage.
Corporate strategies and capabilities of leading caprolactam producers and derivatives players shaping competition and collaboration in the sector
Companies active in caprolactam and its derivative segments are pursuing a mix of strategies to secure feedstock, differentiate product offerings, and manage regulatory risk. Leading producers are differentiating through technical capabilities that improve yield, lower impurities, and enable the supply of specialty grades for demanding engineering applications. These capabilities are often supported by targeted R&D investments and collaborations with converter customers to co-develop formulations that meet precise performance or sustainability criteria.
Strategic partnerships and joint ventures continue to be attractive mechanisms for sharing risk on large capital projects and for accessing regional distribution networks. Firms with integrated upstream and downstream footprints maintain advantages when supply volatility spikes, but they must also navigate internal transfer pricing and the operational complexity of multi-site coordination. Conversely, nimble independent converters focus on customer intimacy and product innovation to defend margins where vertical integration is not feasible.
A secondary axis of competition revolves around sustainability credentials and traceability. Companies that can reliably demonstrate lower carbon intensity, closed-loop initiatives, or compliance with evolving regulatory standards position themselves favorably with global brands and procurement teams that increasingly prioritize environmental performance. In summary, organizational success is tied to a balanced approach that blends technical excellence, supply chain flexibility, and proactive regulatory engagement.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience optimize supply and align with sustainability and customer requirements
To strengthen resilience and capitalize on evolving opportunities, industry leaders should pursue a set of practical priorities that align operational performance with strategic outcomes. First, invest in modular and flexible process capabilities that allow rapid adjustments to feedstock sources and product grades; this reduces exposure to single-supplier risks and tariff-driven cost swings while enabling swift responses to customer specification changes.
Second, prioritize decarbonization and water-efficiency projects that deliver measurable reductions in lifecycle environmental impacts. Targeting interventions that also improve energy efficiency can create dual benefits of lower operating costs and enhanced market access where buyers require documented sustainability credentials. Third, deepen collaboration with downstream customers by offering application-specific technical support and co-development programs. This customer-centric approach can convert commodity relationships into partnerships characterized by longer contracts and value-sharing arrangements.
Fourth, enhance commercial agility through improved tariff and trade analytics, customs optimization, and logistics redundancy planning. Firms that can proactively manage duties and border processes will sustain more stable supply and pricing for their customers. Finally, build governance frameworks for rapid scenario planning and capital prioritization, ensuring that investment decisions are resilient across a range of regulatory, feedstock, and demand outcomes. Executing these recommendations will require cross-functional coordination, but the resulting strategic optionality will be a significant competitive differentiator.
A transparent description of research methods data sources and analytical approaches used to develop actionable insights on the caprolactam landscape
The analysis underpinning this report integrates primary and secondary research with rigorous data validation and qualitative expert interviews. Primary engagement included structured consultations with industry executives, process engineers, and procurement leaders across the value chain to capture operational realities, commercial priorities, and technology trajectories. These primary inputs were used to contextualize and challenge findings drawn from peer-reviewed literature, regulatory filings, and technical white papers.
Secondary research encompassed corporate disclosures, plant-level process descriptions, patent landscapes, and energy input profiles to map production footprints and technology adoption patterns. Analytical approaches included scenario analysis to examine tariff and supply shock implications, sensitivity testing for feedstock and energy cost variations, and comparative assessments of process pathways to evaluate environmental and economic trade-offs. Triangulation across multiple sources ensured coherence between qualitative insights and documented evidence.
Throughout the research process, data quality controls and plausibility checks were applied to detect anomalies and to reconcile conflicting inputs. Expert review sessions validated key assumptions and refined narratives around technology diffusion and policy impacts. The resulting methodology combines robust empirical grounding with forward-looking scenario work to provide stakeholders with actionable intelligence that supports operational planning and strategic investment decisions.
Concluding synthesis that crystallizes strategic takeaways and future considerations for stakeholders across the caprolactam value chain
The concluding synthesis distills core implications for stakeholders navigating the caprolactam ecosystem. The interplay of sustainability expectations, evolving process technologies, and trade policy creates a dynamic environment in which technical capability and supply chain agility determine competitive advantage. Producers that align capital deployment with decarbonization priorities while maintaining flexibility to shift feedstock and product mixes will be best positioned to meet customer needs and regulatory requirements.
Downstream converters and brands should engage more proactively with upstream suppliers to secure low-risk access to tailored grades and to participate in circularity initiatives that respond to end-market preferences. Meanwhile, procurement and supply chain teams must strengthen scenario planning capabilities to handle tariff-related volatility and episodic supply disruptions, leveraging customs optimization and regional diversification where strategically justified.
Looking ahead, the most successful organizations will integrate technological upgrading, sustainability performance, and commercial innovation into a cohesive strategy. This integrated posture reduces exposure to external shocks and creates the conditions for premium positioning in segments that value performance, traceability, and environmental stewardship. The synthesis underscores that deliberate, technically informed choices taken today will shape resilience and opportunity capture over the medium to long term.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A clear, concise introduction that situates caprolactam within global chemical value chains and highlights its strategic importance to downstream industries
Caprolactam is a foundational intermediate in the production of nylon-6 and a critical input for diverse downstream applications that range from automotive components to high-performance engineering plastics. Its role as both a feedstock and an enabler of polymer properties places it at the intersection of commodity chemical manufacturing and advanced materials engineering. Over recent years, evolving feedstock economics, process technology improvements, and shifting regulatory and sustainability expectations have amplified the strategic importance of caprolactam in corporate planning and national industrial policy.
Understanding caprolactam requires attention to the entire value chain, including upstream raw material sourcing, process pathways such as the cyclohexanone route and phenol-based alternatives, and downstream conversion into fibers, films, and molded components. These linkages determine cost exposure, supply risk, and the potential for differentiation through specialty grades or technical formulations. As firms evaluate investment and sourcing decisions, they must balance near-term supply continuity with longer-term transitions toward lower-carbon production pathways and circularity initiatives.
This introductory perspective frames the subsequent analysis by highlighting the chemical’s functional attributes, the diversity of end uses it supports, and the strategic trade-offs companies face when optimizing production footprint, contractual frameworks, and product portfolios. It also sets expectations that policy shifts and technological advances will continue to reshape competitive dynamics across regions and along the supply chain.
Transformative shifts reshaping caprolactam supply chains driven by sustainability mandates technological innovation and evolving feedstock economics
The caprolactam landscape is undergoing several transformative shifts that will influence supply, demand, and strategic positioning across the value chain. First, sustainability imperatives are accelerating investments in lower-emission production pathways and feedstock diversification. Producers are increasingly evaluating carbon intensity across upstream processes and considering electrification, heat integration, and alternative hydrogen sources to reduce lifecycle emissions. These initiatives are influencing capital allocation decisions and priorities for retrofit versus greenfield projects.
Second, technological innovation in both process chemistry and catalyst design is enhancing yield and impurity control, enabling producers to offer differentiated product grades that meet stringent performance or regulatory standards. Improvements in process economics for cyclohexanone-route technologies and refinements in solvent recovery and wastewater treatment are lowering operating costs and environmental footprints simultaneously. Consequently, incumbents with technical depth can create margins through specialty grades and tailored formulations for demanding applications.
Third, supply chain resiliency is becoming a core competency as geopolitical tensions and trade policy shifts create episodic disruptions. Companies are re-evaluating sourcing strategies, considering flexible offtake arrangements, and expanding regional manufacturing capacity to shorten lead times. Finally, downstream demand patterns are shifting as automotive electrification, evolving textile sustainability expectations, and growth in engineered plastics for consumer electronics change product specifications and volumes. Together, these forces are prompting a strategic realignment that rewards agility, technical innovation, and proactive regulatory engagement.
Assessment of the cumulative implications of recent and proposed United States tariff measures on caprolactam trade flows and sourcing dynamics
United States tariff measures announced or implemented in recent policy cycles have exerted a compound effect on caprolactam trade dynamics, influencing sourcing decisions, cost structures, and the redistribution of supply across regions. Tariff adjustments have increased the premium on secure, near-shore supply options and accelerated conversations about reshoring and regional integration. As a result, procurement teams are recalibrating long-term supplier portfolios to manage tariff exposure and to maintain continuity in feedstock availability.
Tariffs have also affected downstream manufacturers differently based on their integration level and product mix. Vertically integrated producers with captive upstream assets have had greater insulation from tariff volatility and can leverage internal transfers to smooth cost pass-throughs. Independent converters and specialty producers that rely heavily on imported intermediates have faced margin compression where tariff levels became a significant component of landed cost. This dynamic prompted contract renegotiations and the exploration of alternate inputs or process modifications to preserve competitive positioning.
In parallel, trade measures have catalyzed investment in logistical capabilities and customs expertise as firms seek to optimize tariff classifications, duty drawback opportunities, and free-trade zone utilization. The cumulative impact has been an increase in operational complexity and a premium on agility, as tariff-induced cost changes are rarely uniform across subsegments or timeframes. Stakeholders are responding by strengthening scenario planning, stress-testing supply routes, and prioritizing supplier relationships that offer flexibility and shared risk mitigation approaches.
Segment-level perspectives revealing application form grade and process distinctions that determine demand patterns and value capture across the value chain
Segment-level dynamics in the caprolactam ecosystem reveal distinct demand drivers and risk profiles across application, form, grade, and technology distinctions. Based on Application, market is studied across Automotive, Carpets, Engineering Plastics, Films, and Textiles. The Engineering Plastics is further studied across Automotive Components, Consumer Goods, and Electrical & Electronics. Each application imposes different purity, pelletization, and additive requirements, creating opportunities for premiumization in high-performance niches while compressing margins in commoditized fiber markets.
Based on Form, market is studied across Liquid and Solid. Liquid intermediates tend to favor integrated polymerization sites and specialty downstream processes, whereas solid forms facilitate global trading and long-term storage strategies. Based on Grade, market is studied across Industrial, Specialty, and Technical. Industrial grades typically meet broad spec requirements for high-volume textile and carpet applications, while specialty and technical grades command higher value by addressing rigorous mechanical, thermal, or regulatory standards for engineering plastics and films.
Based on Technology, market is studied across Cyclohexanone Process and Phenol Process. The cyclohexanone route remains dominant in many regions due to established infrastructure and feedstock compatibility, but phenol-route variations offer pathways to different cost and impurity profiles, which can be advantageous for certain high-end applications. Understanding how these segmentation vectors interact is essential for manufacturers and buyers seeking to align product development, sourcing strategies, and investment priorities with evolving downstream requirements and environmental constraints.
Regional dynamics and competitive positioning across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia-Pacific that influence caprolactam production and consumption
Regional patterns in production capability, feedstock access, regulatory context, and downstream demand shape the competitive landscape for caprolactam across the major global regions. In the Americas, integrated chemical complexes and proximity to automotive and textile converters create strong interdependencies, with logistics and energy costs playing a significant role in competitiveness. Policy incentives and growing interest in localized supply chains have encouraged investments aimed at reducing import dependence and shortening lead times to key converters.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, stringent environmental regulation, recycling mandates, and commitments to decarbonization are influencing plant operations and capital investment priorities. Producers in this region face higher compliance costs but also enjoy demand for differentiated low-carbon and certified products, which can command price premiums in certain supply chains. The presence of technology providers and engineering firms supports decarbonization retrofits and process optimization projects.
Asia-Pacific remains the largest production and consumption hub, underpinned by dense downstream manufacturing clusters, integrated petrochemical complexes, and a broad range of upstream feedstock sources. Competitive energy pricing in some economies and proximity to major textile and engineering plastics manufacturers sustain high throughput volumes. Across all regions, the interplay between regulatory pressures, trade policy, and customer specification trends determines which investments and strategic moves will yield the greatest long-term advantage.
Corporate strategies and capabilities of leading caprolactam producers and derivatives players shaping competition and collaboration in the sector
Companies active in caprolactam and its derivative segments are pursuing a mix of strategies to secure feedstock, differentiate product offerings, and manage regulatory risk. Leading producers are differentiating through technical capabilities that improve yield, lower impurities, and enable the supply of specialty grades for demanding engineering applications. These capabilities are often supported by targeted R&D investments and collaborations with converter customers to co-develop formulations that meet precise performance or sustainability criteria.
Strategic partnerships and joint ventures continue to be attractive mechanisms for sharing risk on large capital projects and for accessing regional distribution networks. Firms with integrated upstream and downstream footprints maintain advantages when supply volatility spikes, but they must also navigate internal transfer pricing and the operational complexity of multi-site coordination. Conversely, nimble independent converters focus on customer intimacy and product innovation to defend margins where vertical integration is not feasible.
A secondary axis of competition revolves around sustainability credentials and traceability. Companies that can reliably demonstrate lower carbon intensity, closed-loop initiatives, or compliance with evolving regulatory standards position themselves favorably with global brands and procurement teams that increasingly prioritize environmental performance. In summary, organizational success is tied to a balanced approach that blends technical excellence, supply chain flexibility, and proactive regulatory engagement.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience optimize supply and align with sustainability and customer requirements
To strengthen resilience and capitalize on evolving opportunities, industry leaders should pursue a set of practical priorities that align operational performance with strategic outcomes. First, invest in modular and flexible process capabilities that allow rapid adjustments to feedstock sources and product grades; this reduces exposure to single-supplier risks and tariff-driven cost swings while enabling swift responses to customer specification changes.
Second, prioritize decarbonization and water-efficiency projects that deliver measurable reductions in lifecycle environmental impacts. Targeting interventions that also improve energy efficiency can create dual benefits of lower operating costs and enhanced market access where buyers require documented sustainability credentials. Third, deepen collaboration with downstream customers by offering application-specific technical support and co-development programs. This customer-centric approach can convert commodity relationships into partnerships characterized by longer contracts and value-sharing arrangements.
Fourth, enhance commercial agility through improved tariff and trade analytics, customs optimization, and logistics redundancy planning. Firms that can proactively manage duties and border processes will sustain more stable supply and pricing for their customers. Finally, build governance frameworks for rapid scenario planning and capital prioritization, ensuring that investment decisions are resilient across a range of regulatory, feedstock, and demand outcomes. Executing these recommendations will require cross-functional coordination, but the resulting strategic optionality will be a significant competitive differentiator.
A transparent description of research methods data sources and analytical approaches used to develop actionable insights on the caprolactam landscape
The analysis underpinning this report integrates primary and secondary research with rigorous data validation and qualitative expert interviews. Primary engagement included structured consultations with industry executives, process engineers, and procurement leaders across the value chain to capture operational realities, commercial priorities, and technology trajectories. These primary inputs were used to contextualize and challenge findings drawn from peer-reviewed literature, regulatory filings, and technical white papers.
Secondary research encompassed corporate disclosures, plant-level process descriptions, patent landscapes, and energy input profiles to map production footprints and technology adoption patterns. Analytical approaches included scenario analysis to examine tariff and supply shock implications, sensitivity testing for feedstock and energy cost variations, and comparative assessments of process pathways to evaluate environmental and economic trade-offs. Triangulation across multiple sources ensured coherence between qualitative insights and documented evidence.
Throughout the research process, data quality controls and plausibility checks were applied to detect anomalies and to reconcile conflicting inputs. Expert review sessions validated key assumptions and refined narratives around technology diffusion and policy impacts. The resulting methodology combines robust empirical grounding with forward-looking scenario work to provide stakeholders with actionable intelligence that supports operational planning and strategic investment decisions.
Concluding synthesis that crystallizes strategic takeaways and future considerations for stakeholders across the caprolactam value chain
The concluding synthesis distills core implications for stakeholders navigating the caprolactam ecosystem. The interplay of sustainability expectations, evolving process technologies, and trade policy creates a dynamic environment in which technical capability and supply chain agility determine competitive advantage. Producers that align capital deployment with decarbonization priorities while maintaining flexibility to shift feedstock and product mixes will be best positioned to meet customer needs and regulatory requirements.
Downstream converters and brands should engage more proactively with upstream suppliers to secure low-risk access to tailored grades and to participate in circularity initiatives that respond to end-market preferences. Meanwhile, procurement and supply chain teams must strengthen scenario planning capabilities to handle tariff-related volatility and episodic supply disruptions, leveraging customs optimization and regional diversification where strategically justified.
Looking ahead, the most successful organizations will integrate technological upgrading, sustainability performance, and commercial innovation into a cohesive strategy. This integrated posture reduces exposure to external shocks and creates the conditions for premium positioning in segments that value performance, traceability, and environmental stewardship. The synthesis underscores that deliberate, technically informed choices taken today will shape resilience and opportunity capture over the medium to long term.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising investments in bio-based caprolactam production technologies to reduce carbon footprint
- 5.2. Strategic capacity expansions of integrated nylon 6 plants in Asia Pacific driven by domestic demand surge
- 5.3. Fluctuating benzene feedstock prices impacting global caprolactam manufacturing cost structures
- 5.4. Stringent environmental regulations driving adoption of cleaner process catalysts in caprolactam plants
- 5.5. Emerging partnerships between caprolactam producers and automotive manufacturers for sustainable nylon materials
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Caprolactam Market, by Form
- 8.1. Liquid
- 8.2. Solid
- 9. Caprolactam Market, by Grade
- 9.1. Industrial
- 9.2. Specialty
- 9.3. Technical
- 10. Caprolactam Market, by Technology
- 10.1. Cyclohexanone Process
- 10.2. Phenol Process
- 11. Caprolactam Market, by Application
- 11.1. Automotive
- 11.2. Carpets
- 11.3. Engineering Plastics
- 11.3.1. Automotive Components
- 11.3.2. Consumer Goods
- 11.3.3. Electrical & Electronics
- 11.4. Films
- 11.5. Textiles
- 12. Caprolactam Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Caprolactam Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Caprolactam Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation
- 15.3.2. BASF SE
- 15.3.3. Invista Holdings Inc
- 15.3.4. LANXESS AG
- 15.3.5. Koninklijke DSM N.V.
- 15.3.6. Asahi Kasei Corporation
- 15.3.7. Toray Industries, Inc.
- 15.3.8. Perstorp Holding AB
- 15.3.9. Grupa Azoty S.A.
- 15.3.10. RadiciGroup Chemical S.p.A.
- 15.3.11. KuibyshevAzot PJSC
- 15.3.12. Highsun Holding Group
- 15.3.13. UBE Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
