Butyric Acid Market by Grade (Food Grade, Industrial Grade, Pharmaceutical Grade), Form (Liquid, Powder), Process, Application, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Butyric Acid Market was valued at USD 427.24 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 454.12 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.33%, reaching USD 698.46 million by 2032.
Foundational framing of butyric acid’s functional roles across industrial and commercial value chains and the implications for strategic sourcing
Butyric acid occupies a distinct position at the intersection of chemical functionality and end-market versatility. As a short-chain fatty acid, its physicochemical properties underpin a range of applications from feed additives that modulate gut health in livestock to niche roles in pharmaceutical formulation and tablet coating. The value proposition of butyric acid extends beyond its intrinsic properties to include formulation flexibility and compatibility with a variety of carriers and delivery systems, which supports its uptake across multiple industrial value chains.
Recent years have seen heightened interest from manufacturers and formulators who value butyric acid’s multifunctional profile. In animal nutrition, its role as a gut-health promoter links directly to productivity and animal welfare objectives. In food and beverage contexts, its contribution as a flavoring agent and preservative requires careful balancing of sensory profiles and regulatory compliance. Additionally, producers supplying cosmetic formulators and polymerists are increasingly focused on purity grades and form factors that influence downstream processing. Consequently, stakeholders must align sourcing strategies with technical specifications, regulatory pathways, and evolving sustainability preferences as they assess butyric acid’s fit within product roadmaps.
How production innovation, regulatory tightening, and shifting end-use demand are jointly reconfiguring supplier strategies and product offerings in the butyric acid landscape
The landscape for butyric acid is experiencing transformative shifts driven by advances in production techniques, regulatory scrutiny, and changing demand signals across end-use sectors. Technological progress in fermentation processes has improved yields and reduced impurity burdens, enabling processors to compete more effectively with synthetic routes that historically dominated large-volume supply. Parallel to this, incremental innovations in downstream purification and formulation have broadened the range of viable product forms, enabling suppliers to offer liquid and powder presentations tailored to specific processing and handling requirements.
Concurrently, regulatory frameworks governing feed additives, food-grade ingredients, and pharmaceutical excipients are evolving to emphasize safety profiles, traceability, and documentation. This regulatory tightening creates differentiation for suppliers that can demonstrate consistent quality, comprehensive dossiers, and transparent supply chains. On the demand side, trends in animal health, nutraceutical interest in gut-modulating compounds, and rising clean-label expectations in food processing are reshaping appetite for different grades and delivery formats. As a result, market participants are compelled to adapt their manufacturing footprints and commercial strategies to capture growth pockets while managing compliance and cost-to-serve metrics.
Assessing the multifaceted operational and procurement consequences of United States tariff adjustments on butyric acid supply chains and sourcing strategies
Tariff developments have introduced a new layer of complexity for stakeholders in the butyric acid supply chain, influencing supplier selection, pricing negotiations, and geographic sourcing strategies. The imposition of tariffs modifies landed cost dynamics and can incentivize nearshoring or supplier diversification to mitigate exposure to tariff-sensitive routes. Firms with integrated manufacturing footprints or access to multiple supply origins gain flexibility to reallocate volumes in response to tariff changes, while buyers dependent on single-source imports face elevated procurement risk.
Moreover, tariffs interact with other trade policy instruments and logistics constraints, potentially affecting inventory policies and contract terms. Procurement teams are increasingly evaluating short-term tactical measures such as staggered shipments and hedged purchasing to smooth cost volatility, alongside longer-term strategic actions like qualifying alternate suppliers in tariff-favorable jurisdictions. Importantly, tariff impacts extend beyond direct cost increases; they also alter the calculus for investments in local processing capabilities, as higher import barriers can strengthen the business case for domestic capacity expansions that reduce dependence on externally sourced intermediates.
Deep segmentation-driven implications highlighting how application, grade, form, process, and distribution choices determine commercial fit and competitive positioning
Segment-driven analysis reveals differentiated demand drivers and technical requirements that inform product strategy and commercialization. When considering application segmentation, butyric acid is evaluated across Animal Feed Additives where subsegments include aquaculture, poultry, ruminants, and swine; Cosmetic Formulations focused on emolliency and preservative synergism; Food and Beverage where functionality encompasses flavoring agents, nutraceuticals, and preservatives; Pharmaceutical Manufacturing where roles include use as a drug solvent and in tablet coating; and Plastic Additives where compatibility with polymer matrices matters. Each application imposes distinct purity, form, and documentation expectations, prompting suppliers to develop targeted grades and supply-chain assurances.
Grade segmentation further differentiates buyer requirements into food grade, industrial grade, and pharmaceutical grade, with progressive increases in documentation, analytical rigor, and manufacturing controls. Form considerations separate liquid and powder presentations, which have divergent handling, stability, and dosing implications for formulators. Process segmentation contrasts fermentation and synthetic production routes, each with its own profile in terms of impurity spectra, carbon footprint characteristics, and raw material dependencies. Distribution channel segmentation distinguishes between direct sales and distributor-mediated supply, influencing unit economics, lead times, and customer service models. Taken together, these segmentation lenses reveal that commercial success hinges on aligning technical specifications and service models with the prioritized needs of distinct end users.
How regional demand profiles and regulatory frameworks across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape procurement priorities and supplier footprints
Regional dynamics shape both demand patterns and the competitive landscape for butyric acid, reflecting divergent end-use compositions and policy environments across major geographies. In the Americas, demand is heavily influenced by mature animal husbandry sectors and established food processing industries that demand consistent supply of feed additives and food-grade ingredients. Infrastructure capacity and proximity to key raw material sources also affect logistics economics and supplier footprints within this region.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous picture where regulatory rigor and sustainability considerations often act as differentiators. European markets place premium value on traceability and compliance documentation, while some Middle Eastern and African markets are characterized by rapid industrialization and growing demand for feed and food additives. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific exhibits a combination of large-scale agricultural demand, rapid expansion in aquaculture and poultry sectors, and an active manufacturing base that emphasizes both cost competitiveness and scale. Regional variations in process preferences, grade demand, and distribution channel maturity demand tailored commercial approaches and localized technical support from suppliers.
Competitive landscape characteristics emphasizing technological differentiation, regulatory compliance, and adaptive commercial models that drive supplier advantage
Competitive dynamics in the butyric acid landscape are characterized by a mix of vertically integrated chemical producers, specialized fermentative manufacturers, and regional formulators that supply tailored grades and presentations. Leading participants differentiate through investments in production technology, purification capability, and regulatory compliance infrastructure. Firms that excel in analytical characterization and quality management systems secure advantaged access to pharmaceutical and food-grade segments where documentation and consistency are non-negotiable.
Strategic partnerships and co-development arrangements are also evident, particularly where end users seek formulations that simplify dosage or improve stability in downstream applications. Companies with flexible manufacturing assets can respond more rapidly to shifts in form preference, such as demand for powder versus liquid presentations. Additionally, distribution strategies vary; some producers emphasize direct sales to strategic accounts to provide technical support and co-development, while others leverage distributor networks to extend reach into fragmented regional markets. Overall, competitive advantage accrues to those who combine technical competence with responsive commercial models and robust supply-chain resilience.
Action-oriented guidance for industry leaders to strengthen supply resilience, align technical capabilities with customer needs, and leverage sourcing flexibility for strategic advantage
Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged approach that balances near-term resilience with long-term capability building. First, prioritize supplier qualification protocols that assess not only price but also production route, impurity profiles, and documentation readiness for higher-grade applications. Investing time in technical due diligence reduces formulation risk and accelerates regulatory approvals downstream. Second, diversify sourcing geographies and consider dual-sourcing arrangements that preserve continuity of supply in the face of tariff shifts, logistics disruptions, or raw material constraints.
Additionally, explore strategic investment in fermentation capabilities or partnerships with biotechnology providers to secure more sustainable and potentially lower-impurity inputs. Enhancing traceability and sustainability disclosures will strengthen commercial positioning with buyers that demand provenance and lifecycle transparency. Finally, optimize distribution strategies by aligning direct sales efforts to large, technically demanding accounts while using distributor partnerships to achieve broader market coverage and responsiveness in regional pockets. Executing these actions will improve operational flexibility and create defensible differentiation in a market where technical credibility and service excellence matter most.
Robust mixed-methods research approach blending primary interviews, technical dossier review, and secondary validation to ensure actionable and technically grounded insights
The research underpinning this analysis combined primary stakeholder interviews, technical dossier reviews, and secondary literature synthesis to triangulate market dynamics and technological trends. Primary engagements included structured conversations with formulators, procurement professionals, and production technologists to surface real-world constraints and preferences related to grade, form, and production route. Technical dossier reviews focused on impurity profiles, stability data, and compliance documentation that differentiate food, industrial, and pharmaceutical grades.
Secondary sources were analyzed to validate regulatory trajectories, trade policy developments, and reported innovations in fermentation and synthetic production. Emphasis was placed on cross-validating claims about process performance with independent laboratory reports and patent activity where available. Where direct commercial data were proprietary, scenario analysis and qualitative assessments were employed to reflect plausible operational responses without relying on specific market-sizing figures. The methodological approach therefore blends qualitative richness with technical verification to produce insights that are actionable for procurement, R&D, and strategic planning functions.
Synthesis of technical and commercial dynamics underscoring the importance of specification alignment, supply resilience, and supplier capability in the butyric acid ecosystem
Butyric acid stands at the confluence of technical utility and evolving commercial expectations. Across animal nutrition, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and polymer additives, its adoption is shaped by nuanced requirements for purity, form, and documentation. Supply-side evolution-driven by fermentation improvements and downstream purification advances-has expanded supplier options, while regulatory developments and tariff movements continue to influence procurement calculus and geographic sourcing strategies.
For stakeholders, the imperative is to match technical specification to application needs while building procurement strategies that mitigate trade and logistics risk. Suppliers that invest in analytical capabilities, quality systems, and flexible production will be best positioned to serve higher-margin, compliance-sensitive segments. Buyers that combine rigorous supplier qualification with diversified sourcing and a focus on sustainability disclosures will secure both continuity and reputational advantage in an environment where traceability and regulatory readiness are increasingly important.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Foundational framing of butyric acid’s functional roles across industrial and commercial value chains and the implications for strategic sourcing
Butyric acid occupies a distinct position at the intersection of chemical functionality and end-market versatility. As a short-chain fatty acid, its physicochemical properties underpin a range of applications from feed additives that modulate gut health in livestock to niche roles in pharmaceutical formulation and tablet coating. The value proposition of butyric acid extends beyond its intrinsic properties to include formulation flexibility and compatibility with a variety of carriers and delivery systems, which supports its uptake across multiple industrial value chains.
Recent years have seen heightened interest from manufacturers and formulators who value butyric acid’s multifunctional profile. In animal nutrition, its role as a gut-health promoter links directly to productivity and animal welfare objectives. In food and beverage contexts, its contribution as a flavoring agent and preservative requires careful balancing of sensory profiles and regulatory compliance. Additionally, producers supplying cosmetic formulators and polymerists are increasingly focused on purity grades and form factors that influence downstream processing. Consequently, stakeholders must align sourcing strategies with technical specifications, regulatory pathways, and evolving sustainability preferences as they assess butyric acid’s fit within product roadmaps.
How production innovation, regulatory tightening, and shifting end-use demand are jointly reconfiguring supplier strategies and product offerings in the butyric acid landscape
The landscape for butyric acid is experiencing transformative shifts driven by advances in production techniques, regulatory scrutiny, and changing demand signals across end-use sectors. Technological progress in fermentation processes has improved yields and reduced impurity burdens, enabling processors to compete more effectively with synthetic routes that historically dominated large-volume supply. Parallel to this, incremental innovations in downstream purification and formulation have broadened the range of viable product forms, enabling suppliers to offer liquid and powder presentations tailored to specific processing and handling requirements.
Concurrently, regulatory frameworks governing feed additives, food-grade ingredients, and pharmaceutical excipients are evolving to emphasize safety profiles, traceability, and documentation. This regulatory tightening creates differentiation for suppliers that can demonstrate consistent quality, comprehensive dossiers, and transparent supply chains. On the demand side, trends in animal health, nutraceutical interest in gut-modulating compounds, and rising clean-label expectations in food processing are reshaping appetite for different grades and delivery formats. As a result, market participants are compelled to adapt their manufacturing footprints and commercial strategies to capture growth pockets while managing compliance and cost-to-serve metrics.
Assessing the multifaceted operational and procurement consequences of United States tariff adjustments on butyric acid supply chains and sourcing strategies
Tariff developments have introduced a new layer of complexity for stakeholders in the butyric acid supply chain, influencing supplier selection, pricing negotiations, and geographic sourcing strategies. The imposition of tariffs modifies landed cost dynamics and can incentivize nearshoring or supplier diversification to mitigate exposure to tariff-sensitive routes. Firms with integrated manufacturing footprints or access to multiple supply origins gain flexibility to reallocate volumes in response to tariff changes, while buyers dependent on single-source imports face elevated procurement risk.
Moreover, tariffs interact with other trade policy instruments and logistics constraints, potentially affecting inventory policies and contract terms. Procurement teams are increasingly evaluating short-term tactical measures such as staggered shipments and hedged purchasing to smooth cost volatility, alongside longer-term strategic actions like qualifying alternate suppliers in tariff-favorable jurisdictions. Importantly, tariff impacts extend beyond direct cost increases; they also alter the calculus for investments in local processing capabilities, as higher import barriers can strengthen the business case for domestic capacity expansions that reduce dependence on externally sourced intermediates.
Deep segmentation-driven implications highlighting how application, grade, form, process, and distribution choices determine commercial fit and competitive positioning
Segment-driven analysis reveals differentiated demand drivers and technical requirements that inform product strategy and commercialization. When considering application segmentation, butyric acid is evaluated across Animal Feed Additives where subsegments include aquaculture, poultry, ruminants, and swine; Cosmetic Formulations focused on emolliency and preservative synergism; Food and Beverage where functionality encompasses flavoring agents, nutraceuticals, and preservatives; Pharmaceutical Manufacturing where roles include use as a drug solvent and in tablet coating; and Plastic Additives where compatibility with polymer matrices matters. Each application imposes distinct purity, form, and documentation expectations, prompting suppliers to develop targeted grades and supply-chain assurances.
Grade segmentation further differentiates buyer requirements into food grade, industrial grade, and pharmaceutical grade, with progressive increases in documentation, analytical rigor, and manufacturing controls. Form considerations separate liquid and powder presentations, which have divergent handling, stability, and dosing implications for formulators. Process segmentation contrasts fermentation and synthetic production routes, each with its own profile in terms of impurity spectra, carbon footprint characteristics, and raw material dependencies. Distribution channel segmentation distinguishes between direct sales and distributor-mediated supply, influencing unit economics, lead times, and customer service models. Taken together, these segmentation lenses reveal that commercial success hinges on aligning technical specifications and service models with the prioritized needs of distinct end users.
How regional demand profiles and regulatory frameworks across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape procurement priorities and supplier footprints
Regional dynamics shape both demand patterns and the competitive landscape for butyric acid, reflecting divergent end-use compositions and policy environments across major geographies. In the Americas, demand is heavily influenced by mature animal husbandry sectors and established food processing industries that demand consistent supply of feed additives and food-grade ingredients. Infrastructure capacity and proximity to key raw material sources also affect logistics economics and supplier footprints within this region.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous picture where regulatory rigor and sustainability considerations often act as differentiators. European markets place premium value on traceability and compliance documentation, while some Middle Eastern and African markets are characterized by rapid industrialization and growing demand for feed and food additives. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific exhibits a combination of large-scale agricultural demand, rapid expansion in aquaculture and poultry sectors, and an active manufacturing base that emphasizes both cost competitiveness and scale. Regional variations in process preferences, grade demand, and distribution channel maturity demand tailored commercial approaches and localized technical support from suppliers.
Competitive landscape characteristics emphasizing technological differentiation, regulatory compliance, and adaptive commercial models that drive supplier advantage
Competitive dynamics in the butyric acid landscape are characterized by a mix of vertically integrated chemical producers, specialized fermentative manufacturers, and regional formulators that supply tailored grades and presentations. Leading participants differentiate through investments in production technology, purification capability, and regulatory compliance infrastructure. Firms that excel in analytical characterization and quality management systems secure advantaged access to pharmaceutical and food-grade segments where documentation and consistency are non-negotiable.
Strategic partnerships and co-development arrangements are also evident, particularly where end users seek formulations that simplify dosage or improve stability in downstream applications. Companies with flexible manufacturing assets can respond more rapidly to shifts in form preference, such as demand for powder versus liquid presentations. Additionally, distribution strategies vary; some producers emphasize direct sales to strategic accounts to provide technical support and co-development, while others leverage distributor networks to extend reach into fragmented regional markets. Overall, competitive advantage accrues to those who combine technical competence with responsive commercial models and robust supply-chain resilience.
Action-oriented guidance for industry leaders to strengthen supply resilience, align technical capabilities with customer needs, and leverage sourcing flexibility for strategic advantage
Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged approach that balances near-term resilience with long-term capability building. First, prioritize supplier qualification protocols that assess not only price but also production route, impurity profiles, and documentation readiness for higher-grade applications. Investing time in technical due diligence reduces formulation risk and accelerates regulatory approvals downstream. Second, diversify sourcing geographies and consider dual-sourcing arrangements that preserve continuity of supply in the face of tariff shifts, logistics disruptions, or raw material constraints.
Additionally, explore strategic investment in fermentation capabilities or partnerships with biotechnology providers to secure more sustainable and potentially lower-impurity inputs. Enhancing traceability and sustainability disclosures will strengthen commercial positioning with buyers that demand provenance and lifecycle transparency. Finally, optimize distribution strategies by aligning direct sales efforts to large, technically demanding accounts while using distributor partnerships to achieve broader market coverage and responsiveness in regional pockets. Executing these actions will improve operational flexibility and create defensible differentiation in a market where technical credibility and service excellence matter most.
Robust mixed-methods research approach blending primary interviews, technical dossier review, and secondary validation to ensure actionable and technically grounded insights
The research underpinning this analysis combined primary stakeholder interviews, technical dossier reviews, and secondary literature synthesis to triangulate market dynamics and technological trends. Primary engagements included structured conversations with formulators, procurement professionals, and production technologists to surface real-world constraints and preferences related to grade, form, and production route. Technical dossier reviews focused on impurity profiles, stability data, and compliance documentation that differentiate food, industrial, and pharmaceutical grades.
Secondary sources were analyzed to validate regulatory trajectories, trade policy developments, and reported innovations in fermentation and synthetic production. Emphasis was placed on cross-validating claims about process performance with independent laboratory reports and patent activity where available. Where direct commercial data were proprietary, scenario analysis and qualitative assessments were employed to reflect plausible operational responses without relying on specific market-sizing figures. The methodological approach therefore blends qualitative richness with technical verification to produce insights that are actionable for procurement, R&D, and strategic planning functions.
Synthesis of technical and commercial dynamics underscoring the importance of specification alignment, supply resilience, and supplier capability in the butyric acid ecosystem
Butyric acid stands at the confluence of technical utility and evolving commercial expectations. Across animal nutrition, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and polymer additives, its adoption is shaped by nuanced requirements for purity, form, and documentation. Supply-side evolution-driven by fermentation improvements and downstream purification advances-has expanded supplier options, while regulatory developments and tariff movements continue to influence procurement calculus and geographic sourcing strategies.
For stakeholders, the imperative is to match technical specification to application needs while building procurement strategies that mitigate trade and logistics risk. Suppliers that invest in analytical capabilities, quality systems, and flexible production will be best positioned to serve higher-margin, compliance-sensitive segments. Buyers that combine rigorous supplier qualification with diversified sourcing and a focus on sustainability disclosures will secure both continuity and reputational advantage in an environment where traceability and regulatory readiness are increasingly important.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
195 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Surging demand for microencapsulated butyric acid feed additives in monogastric livestock nutrition driven by antibiotic reduction policies
- 5.2. Scaling up cell-free synthetic biology platforms for cost-effective bio-based butyric acid production from agricultural waste biomass
- 5.3. Regulatory harmonization in the EU and US boosting investment in high-purity butyric acid for human gut health supplements
- 5.4. Development of innovative butyric acid-derived monomers for sustainable bio-polyester applications in packaging industries
- 5.5. Emergence of precision fermentation techniques enabling high-yield microbial synthesis of butyric acid at industrial scale
- 5.6. Integration of butyric acid in functional food formulations to address microbiome-mediated metabolic disorders and glycemic control
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Butyric Acid Market, by Grade
- 8.1. Food Grade
- 8.2. Industrial Grade
- 8.3. Pharmaceutical Grade
- 9. Butyric Acid Market, by Form
- 9.1. Liquid
- 9.2. Powder
- 10. Butyric Acid Market, by Process
- 10.1. Fermentation
- 10.2. Synthetic
- 11. Butyric Acid Market, by Application
- 11.1. Animal Feed Additives
- 11.1.1. Aquaculture
- 11.1.2. Poultry
- 11.1.3. Ruminants
- 11.1.4. Swine
- 11.2. Cosmetic Formulations
- 11.3. Food And Beverage
- 11.3.1. Flavoring Agents
- 11.3.2. Nutraceuticals
- 11.3.3. Preservatives
- 11.4. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
- 11.4.1. Drug Solvent
- 11.4.2. Tablet Coating
- 11.5. Plastic Additives
- 12. Butyric Acid Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Offline
- 12.2. Online
- 13. Butyric Acid Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Butyric Acid Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Butyric Acid Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Advanced Biotech
- 16.3.2. Axxence Aromatic GmbH
- 16.3.3. BASF SE
- 16.3.4. Blue Marble Biomaterials, LLC
- 16.3.5. Celanese Corporation
- 16.3.6. Eastman Chemical Company
- 16.3.7. Ennolys SAS
- 16.3.8. Green Biologics Limited
- 16.3.9. Hefei TNJ Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.10. Jinan Yuxin Butyric Acid Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.11. Kemin Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.12. Merck KGaA
- 16.3.13. OQ Chemicals GmbH
- 16.3.14. Palital Feed Additives B.V.
- 16.3.15. Perstorp Holding AB
- 16.3.16. Snowco Industrial Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.17. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 16.3.18. Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.19. Vigon International, LLC
- 16.3.20. Yufeng International Group Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
