Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market by Product Type (Films, Gels, Patches), Drug Class (Analgesics, Cardiovascular, Central Nervous System), Application, End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market was valued at USD 2.43 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.61 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.68%, reaching USD 5.10 billion by 2032.
An evolving clinical and technological foundation for buccal drug delivery that accelerates therapeutic onset while enhancing patient acceptance and formulation control
Buccal drug delivery has emerged as a practical and increasingly preferred route for a broad range of therapeutics, combining the advantages of rapid onset, noninvasive administration, and partial avoidance of first-pass hepatic metabolism. Clinicians and developers appreciate the route for its applicability to pain management agents, hormones, certain cardiovascular therapies, and select central nervous system compounds. Over the past decade, improvements in mucoadhesive polymers, thin-film technologies, and patient-centric dosage forms have expanded the therapeutic window for both small molecules and some biologic fragments, enabling more convenient dosing paradigms and improved adherence profiles.
At the same time, regulatory authorities have clarified expectations for bioequivalence, local safety, and excipient compatibility, which has increased confidence among developers contemplating buccal as a primary or secondary route of administration. Advances in formulation science have reduced variability in mucosal absorption and enhanced taste-masking, while device and packaging innovations have improved dose accuracy and transport resilience. Taken together, these technical and regulatory shifts make buccal delivery a strategic choice for organizations seeking to differentiate products on the basis of speed to therapeutic effect, ease of use, and patient experience.
Converging formulation science, device integration, and patient-centric commercialization that together redefine realistic applications for buccal therapeutics
The landscape for buccal drug delivery is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging technological, clinical, and commercial forces. Formulation science has moved beyond traditional matrix systems toward engineered films and adhesive platforms that precisely tune residence time and release kinetics, enabling therapies that once required parenteral administration to be reconsidered for transmucosal delivery. Concurrently, polymer science innovations such as advanced cellulose derivatives and synthetic mucoadhesives have improved robustness across variable salivary and mucosal conditions, reducing interpatient variability and facilitating regulatory submissions backed by reproducible in vivo performance.
Commercially, there is a stronger emphasis on patient-centric design: thin, discreet films and single-actuation sprays appeal to ambulatory and home-care settings, while chewable tablets and lozenges retain appeal for specific patient cohorts. Digital enablement and adherence support are emerging as differentiators, with integrated sensors and companion apps being piloted to track usage and support outcomes. Strategically, partnerships between specialty pharmaceutical firms, contract development and manufacturing organizations, and device innovators are accelerating time-to-market and spreading technical risk. Taken together, these shifts are expanding the range of viable active molecules, pushing regulatory pathways toward greater clarity, and creating new commercial channels for buccal therapies.
How shifting trade costs and tariff measures have accelerated supply chain resilience planning and input rationalization across buccal pharmaceutical manufacturing
The cumulative impact of tariff actions implemented through 2025 has reshaped supply chain economics and sourcing strategies for manufacturers that rely on cross-border flows of active pharmaceutical ingredients, specialty polymers, and primary packaging materials. Increased import duties and associated administrative costs have raised landed input costs, prompting procurement teams to reassess supplier portfolios and logistics models. In response, many organizations accelerated nearshoring initiatives to mitigate exposure to tariff volatility and to compress lead times for critical excipients such as advanced cellulose derivatives, adhesive components, and unit-dose packaging substrates.
At the same time, higher import costs have intensified scrutiny of formulation design to reduce reliance on exotic or single-source inputs. Developers have prioritized formulation simplification and local qualification of substitute excipients while investing in robust supplier qualification programs. Regulatory teams have been required to support controlled change management and comparability studies where substitutions were made, increasing the volume of technical documentation submitted to health authorities. Commercial teams have explored pricing strategies and promotional support to offset margin pressure, while strategic sourcing has leaned more heavily on multi-sourcing and longer-term contracts to stabilize supply. Overall, tariff-driven pressure has accelerated structural shifts toward supply chain resilience, input rationalization, and tighter integration between R&D, regulatory, and procurement functions.
Strategic segmentation insights linking product form factors, drug classes, clinical applications, end-user preferences, and distribution channels to commercialization choices
A granular understanding of product-type segmentation is central to commercial and technical prioritization. Products across films, gels, patches, sprays, and tablets each present distinct formulation and manufacturing considerations; within films, cellulose derivatives, natural polymers, and synthetic polymers each require different casting, drying, and quality control approaches, while the cellulose derivative family itself includes materials such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and microcrystalline cellulose that influence mechanical properties and drug-release profiles. Gel systems divide into hydrogels and organogels, each suited to different active molecule solubility and mucosal compatibility characteristics. Patches present choices between adhesive patch designs and matrix patch designs that drive back-end lamination and adhesive transfer processes, while sprays must reconcile single-actuation versus multi-actuation delivery for dose precision and patient convenience. Tablets span chewable forms, lozenges, and mucoadhesive tablets, each with distinct compression, disintegration, and residence-time attributes.
Drug-class segmentation further refines development priorities: analgesics such as buprenorphine and fentanyl require stringent dose accuracy and tamper-resistance considerations, cardiovascular agents like nitroglycerin prioritize rapid onset and consistent mucosal absorption, and hormones such as estradiol and testosterone necessitate precise bioavailability control and local tolerability data. Application-driven segmentation-cardiovascular treatment, hormone therapy, pain management, and psychiatry-aligns clinical needs with dosage form choices and end-user settings. End users including clinics, home-care environments, and hospitals exert different demands on packaging, dosing simplicity, and storage. Finally, distribution dynamics from hospital pharmacies to online and retail pharmacies shape go-to-market strategies, reimbursement complexities, and patient access pathways.
Regional regulatory, manufacturing, and commercial dynamics that determine adoption pathways and evidence needs across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics materially influence development priorities, regulatory strategy, and commercial execution. In the Americas, clinical familiarity with buccal options for pain management and hormone therapy supports rapid uptake in ambulatory and home-care segments, while regulatory pathways emphasize bioequivalence and post-marketing surveillance. The region’s distribution channels favor integrated hospital and retail pharmacy strategies, and payer debates increasingly focus on value-based outcomes and adherence measures.
Europe, the Middle East & Africa present a complex mosaic of regulatory regimes and reimbursement landscapes, where harmonization efforts coexist with country-level variability. In parts of Europe, well-established regulatory frameworks and patient acceptance of noninvasive alternatives facilitate adoption of films and patches, whereas markets in the Middle East and Africa require targeted approaches to cold chain, packaging durability, and healthcare infrastructure alignment. Collaboration with regional partners and tailored evidence generation often proves decisive in these territories.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid adoption of novel dosage forms, a strong manufacturing base for polymers and primary packaging, and a growing emphasis on locally driven innovation. Regulatory agility in select APAC markets and the presence of large patient populations with unmet needs in pain management and hormone therapy create fertile ground for pilot projects and scale-up. Across regions, successful commercialization depends on aligning regulatory dossiers, supply chain footprint, and channel strategies with local health system realities and patient preferences.
Competitive and collaborative dynamics emphasizing platform ownership, manufacturing partnerships, and regulatory execution as decisive differentiators in buccal therapeutics
Competitive dynamics in the buccal space are defined by innovation in formulation platforms, strategic partnerships, and differentiated go-to-market capabilities. Leading developers invest in proprietary mucoadhesive chemistries, thin-film manufacturing know-how, and integrated device solutions that enable precise dosing. Contract development and manufacturing organizations play a pivotal role in scaling thin films, adhesive patches, and spray systems, offering specialized capabilities that de-risk capital investment for smaller innovators. Licensing and co-development deals frequently pair molecule owners with formulation specialists to bridge therapeutic intent and delivery capability.
Companies that combine formulation expertise with robust regulatory and clinical operations gain advantage, particularly when they can demonstrate consistent mucosal absorption, minimal local irritation, and simplified patient handling. There is also a growing bifurcation between premium, device-integrated branded products and more cost-sensitive generic equivalents that emphasize manufacturing efficiency and supply chain reliability. Intellectual property strategies increasingly focus on platform protections, excipient combinations, and manufacturing processes rather than solely on active moiety claims, shaping M&A and partnership activity across the sector.
Practical strategic actions to strengthen formulation resilience, clinical differentiation, manufacturing scale-up, and channel alignment for sustained commercial success
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of coordinated actions that protect development timelines while opening commercial optionality. First, invest in robust polymer and excipient qualification programs that allow for rapid substitution and local sourcing without compromising comparability; doing so reduces exposure to trade volatility and short-term supply shocks. Second, design clinical programs that combine local tolerability endpoints with surrogate pharmacokinetic markers to streamline regulatory acceptance and to demonstrate consistent mucosal performance across patient subgroups. Third, develop differentiated patient experiences through thin films, single-actuation sprays, and adhesive patches while pairing products with adherence-support tools and clear educational materials that facilitate outpatient use.
Additionally, pursue strategic partnerships with specialized manufacturers and device developers to accelerate scale-up and to secure manufacturing redundancy. Align commercial channels with end-user realities by tailoring packaging and dosing instructions for hospitals, clinics, and home-care settings, and create distribution strategies that reflect the nuances of hospital pharmacies, online platforms, and retail networks. Finally, maintain proactive pricing and contracting strategies that address payers’ focus on outcomes and adherence, and invest in post-market surveillance to capture real-world evidence that supports long-term uptake and formulary inclusion.
A multi-source research framework combining literature review, expert interviews, regulatory analysis, and supply chain mapping to produce validated buccal delivery insights
The research approach combined systematic evidence gathering with expert validation to ensure actionable insights. Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed literature, clinical trial registries, patent filings, and regulatory guidance documents to create a technical foundation for formulation, safety, and bioavailability considerations. Primary inputs were collected via structured interviews with formulation scientists, regulatory professionals, contract manufacturers, clinicians, and procurement leads, supplemented by an expert advisory review to resolve technical trade-offs and region-specific nuances.
Data triangulation reconciled disparate sources, aligning technical feasibility, clinical acceptability, and commercial viability. Supply chain mapping identified critical nodes for polymers, adhesives, APIs, and packaging, and sensitivity checks examined how sourcing shifts and tariff dynamics affect operational decisions. Where substitution of excipients was considered, comparability frameworks and regulatory pathways were referenced to ensure change management strategies were robust. Finally, limitations were acknowledged: emerging technologies and proprietary platform data can evolve rapidly, so recommendations emphasize adaptable roadmaps and staged validation rather than fixed prescriptions.
Synthesis of technological, regulatory, and commercial imperatives that determine which organizations will successfully translate buccal delivery potential into market-ready therapies
Buccal drug delivery stands at an inflection point where formulation maturity, regulatory clarity, and shifting commercial expectations converge to create tangible opportunities for patient-centered therapeutics. Advances in polymer science, thin-film engineering, and device integration have expanded the range of feasible actives and improved patient acceptability, while regional adoption patterns and supply chain realities shape where and how those opportunities can be executed. The sector will increasingly reward organizations that couple technical capability with agile sourcing, rigorous regulatory planning, and thoughtful channel strategies.
In closing, stakeholders that adopt a systems view-aligning R&D, regulatory, procurement, and commercial teams-will be better positioned to translate buccal delivery’s intrinsic advantages into differentiated products and sustainable market presence. Continued investment in evidence generation, manufacturing partnerships, and adherence-focused commercial models will be decisive in determining winners in the evolving buccal therapeutics landscape.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An evolving clinical and technological foundation for buccal drug delivery that accelerates therapeutic onset while enhancing patient acceptance and formulation control
Buccal drug delivery has emerged as a practical and increasingly preferred route for a broad range of therapeutics, combining the advantages of rapid onset, noninvasive administration, and partial avoidance of first-pass hepatic metabolism. Clinicians and developers appreciate the route for its applicability to pain management agents, hormones, certain cardiovascular therapies, and select central nervous system compounds. Over the past decade, improvements in mucoadhesive polymers, thin-film technologies, and patient-centric dosage forms have expanded the therapeutic window for both small molecules and some biologic fragments, enabling more convenient dosing paradigms and improved adherence profiles.
At the same time, regulatory authorities have clarified expectations for bioequivalence, local safety, and excipient compatibility, which has increased confidence among developers contemplating buccal as a primary or secondary route of administration. Advances in formulation science have reduced variability in mucosal absorption and enhanced taste-masking, while device and packaging innovations have improved dose accuracy and transport resilience. Taken together, these technical and regulatory shifts make buccal delivery a strategic choice for organizations seeking to differentiate products on the basis of speed to therapeutic effect, ease of use, and patient experience.
Converging formulation science, device integration, and patient-centric commercialization that together redefine realistic applications for buccal therapeutics
The landscape for buccal drug delivery is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging technological, clinical, and commercial forces. Formulation science has moved beyond traditional matrix systems toward engineered films and adhesive platforms that precisely tune residence time and release kinetics, enabling therapies that once required parenteral administration to be reconsidered for transmucosal delivery. Concurrently, polymer science innovations such as advanced cellulose derivatives and synthetic mucoadhesives have improved robustness across variable salivary and mucosal conditions, reducing interpatient variability and facilitating regulatory submissions backed by reproducible in vivo performance.
Commercially, there is a stronger emphasis on patient-centric design: thin, discreet films and single-actuation sprays appeal to ambulatory and home-care settings, while chewable tablets and lozenges retain appeal for specific patient cohorts. Digital enablement and adherence support are emerging as differentiators, with integrated sensors and companion apps being piloted to track usage and support outcomes. Strategically, partnerships between specialty pharmaceutical firms, contract development and manufacturing organizations, and device innovators are accelerating time-to-market and spreading technical risk. Taken together, these shifts are expanding the range of viable active molecules, pushing regulatory pathways toward greater clarity, and creating new commercial channels for buccal therapies.
How shifting trade costs and tariff measures have accelerated supply chain resilience planning and input rationalization across buccal pharmaceutical manufacturing
The cumulative impact of tariff actions implemented through 2025 has reshaped supply chain economics and sourcing strategies for manufacturers that rely on cross-border flows of active pharmaceutical ingredients, specialty polymers, and primary packaging materials. Increased import duties and associated administrative costs have raised landed input costs, prompting procurement teams to reassess supplier portfolios and logistics models. In response, many organizations accelerated nearshoring initiatives to mitigate exposure to tariff volatility and to compress lead times for critical excipients such as advanced cellulose derivatives, adhesive components, and unit-dose packaging substrates.
At the same time, higher import costs have intensified scrutiny of formulation design to reduce reliance on exotic or single-source inputs. Developers have prioritized formulation simplification and local qualification of substitute excipients while investing in robust supplier qualification programs. Regulatory teams have been required to support controlled change management and comparability studies where substitutions were made, increasing the volume of technical documentation submitted to health authorities. Commercial teams have explored pricing strategies and promotional support to offset margin pressure, while strategic sourcing has leaned more heavily on multi-sourcing and longer-term contracts to stabilize supply. Overall, tariff-driven pressure has accelerated structural shifts toward supply chain resilience, input rationalization, and tighter integration between R&D, regulatory, and procurement functions.
Strategic segmentation insights linking product form factors, drug classes, clinical applications, end-user preferences, and distribution channels to commercialization choices
A granular understanding of product-type segmentation is central to commercial and technical prioritization. Products across films, gels, patches, sprays, and tablets each present distinct formulation and manufacturing considerations; within films, cellulose derivatives, natural polymers, and synthetic polymers each require different casting, drying, and quality control approaches, while the cellulose derivative family itself includes materials such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and microcrystalline cellulose that influence mechanical properties and drug-release profiles. Gel systems divide into hydrogels and organogels, each suited to different active molecule solubility and mucosal compatibility characteristics. Patches present choices between adhesive patch designs and matrix patch designs that drive back-end lamination and adhesive transfer processes, while sprays must reconcile single-actuation versus multi-actuation delivery for dose precision and patient convenience. Tablets span chewable forms, lozenges, and mucoadhesive tablets, each with distinct compression, disintegration, and residence-time attributes.
Drug-class segmentation further refines development priorities: analgesics such as buprenorphine and fentanyl require stringent dose accuracy and tamper-resistance considerations, cardiovascular agents like nitroglycerin prioritize rapid onset and consistent mucosal absorption, and hormones such as estradiol and testosterone necessitate precise bioavailability control and local tolerability data. Application-driven segmentation-cardiovascular treatment, hormone therapy, pain management, and psychiatry-aligns clinical needs with dosage form choices and end-user settings. End users including clinics, home-care environments, and hospitals exert different demands on packaging, dosing simplicity, and storage. Finally, distribution dynamics from hospital pharmacies to online and retail pharmacies shape go-to-market strategies, reimbursement complexities, and patient access pathways.
Regional regulatory, manufacturing, and commercial dynamics that determine adoption pathways and evidence needs across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics materially influence development priorities, regulatory strategy, and commercial execution. In the Americas, clinical familiarity with buccal options for pain management and hormone therapy supports rapid uptake in ambulatory and home-care segments, while regulatory pathways emphasize bioequivalence and post-marketing surveillance. The region’s distribution channels favor integrated hospital and retail pharmacy strategies, and payer debates increasingly focus on value-based outcomes and adherence measures.
Europe, the Middle East & Africa present a complex mosaic of regulatory regimes and reimbursement landscapes, where harmonization efforts coexist with country-level variability. In parts of Europe, well-established regulatory frameworks and patient acceptance of noninvasive alternatives facilitate adoption of films and patches, whereas markets in the Middle East and Africa require targeted approaches to cold chain, packaging durability, and healthcare infrastructure alignment. Collaboration with regional partners and tailored evidence generation often proves decisive in these territories.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid adoption of novel dosage forms, a strong manufacturing base for polymers and primary packaging, and a growing emphasis on locally driven innovation. Regulatory agility in select APAC markets and the presence of large patient populations with unmet needs in pain management and hormone therapy create fertile ground for pilot projects and scale-up. Across regions, successful commercialization depends on aligning regulatory dossiers, supply chain footprint, and channel strategies with local health system realities and patient preferences.
Competitive and collaborative dynamics emphasizing platform ownership, manufacturing partnerships, and regulatory execution as decisive differentiators in buccal therapeutics
Competitive dynamics in the buccal space are defined by innovation in formulation platforms, strategic partnerships, and differentiated go-to-market capabilities. Leading developers invest in proprietary mucoadhesive chemistries, thin-film manufacturing know-how, and integrated device solutions that enable precise dosing. Contract development and manufacturing organizations play a pivotal role in scaling thin films, adhesive patches, and spray systems, offering specialized capabilities that de-risk capital investment for smaller innovators. Licensing and co-development deals frequently pair molecule owners with formulation specialists to bridge therapeutic intent and delivery capability.
Companies that combine formulation expertise with robust regulatory and clinical operations gain advantage, particularly when they can demonstrate consistent mucosal absorption, minimal local irritation, and simplified patient handling. There is also a growing bifurcation between premium, device-integrated branded products and more cost-sensitive generic equivalents that emphasize manufacturing efficiency and supply chain reliability. Intellectual property strategies increasingly focus on platform protections, excipient combinations, and manufacturing processes rather than solely on active moiety claims, shaping M&A and partnership activity across the sector.
Practical strategic actions to strengthen formulation resilience, clinical differentiation, manufacturing scale-up, and channel alignment for sustained commercial success
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of coordinated actions that protect development timelines while opening commercial optionality. First, invest in robust polymer and excipient qualification programs that allow for rapid substitution and local sourcing without compromising comparability; doing so reduces exposure to trade volatility and short-term supply shocks. Second, design clinical programs that combine local tolerability endpoints with surrogate pharmacokinetic markers to streamline regulatory acceptance and to demonstrate consistent mucosal performance across patient subgroups. Third, develop differentiated patient experiences through thin films, single-actuation sprays, and adhesive patches while pairing products with adherence-support tools and clear educational materials that facilitate outpatient use.
Additionally, pursue strategic partnerships with specialized manufacturers and device developers to accelerate scale-up and to secure manufacturing redundancy. Align commercial channels with end-user realities by tailoring packaging and dosing instructions for hospitals, clinics, and home-care settings, and create distribution strategies that reflect the nuances of hospital pharmacies, online platforms, and retail networks. Finally, maintain proactive pricing and contracting strategies that address payers’ focus on outcomes and adherence, and invest in post-market surveillance to capture real-world evidence that supports long-term uptake and formulary inclusion.
A multi-source research framework combining literature review, expert interviews, regulatory analysis, and supply chain mapping to produce validated buccal delivery insights
The research approach combined systematic evidence gathering with expert validation to ensure actionable insights. Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed literature, clinical trial registries, patent filings, and regulatory guidance documents to create a technical foundation for formulation, safety, and bioavailability considerations. Primary inputs were collected via structured interviews with formulation scientists, regulatory professionals, contract manufacturers, clinicians, and procurement leads, supplemented by an expert advisory review to resolve technical trade-offs and region-specific nuances.
Data triangulation reconciled disparate sources, aligning technical feasibility, clinical acceptability, and commercial viability. Supply chain mapping identified critical nodes for polymers, adhesives, APIs, and packaging, and sensitivity checks examined how sourcing shifts and tariff dynamics affect operational decisions. Where substitution of excipients was considered, comparability frameworks and regulatory pathways were referenced to ensure change management strategies were robust. Finally, limitations were acknowledged: emerging technologies and proprietary platform data can evolve rapidly, so recommendations emphasize adaptable roadmaps and staged validation rather than fixed prescriptions.
Synthesis of technological, regulatory, and commercial imperatives that determine which organizations will successfully translate buccal delivery potential into market-ready therapies
Buccal drug delivery stands at an inflection point where formulation maturity, regulatory clarity, and shifting commercial expectations converge to create tangible opportunities for patient-centered therapeutics. Advances in polymer science, thin-film engineering, and device integration have expanded the range of feasible actives and improved patient acceptability, while regional adoption patterns and supply chain realities shape where and how those opportunities can be executed. The sector will increasingly reward organizations that couple technical capability with agile sourcing, rigorous regulatory planning, and thoughtful channel strategies.
In closing, stakeholders that adopt a systems view-aligning R&D, regulatory, procurement, and commercial teams-will be better positioned to translate buccal delivery’s intrinsic advantages into differentiated products and sustainable market presence. Continued investment in evidence generation, manufacturing partnerships, and adherence-focused commercial models will be decisive in determining winners in the evolving buccal therapeutics landscape.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
199 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Advancement in mucoadhesive nanoparticle formulations for enhanced buccal drug bioavailability
- 5.2. Application of 3D printing technologies to customize buccal film dosage forms for personalized therapy
- 5.3. Exploration of permeation enhancers to optimize drug absorption through buccal mucosa membranes
- 5.4. Development of sustained-release buccal adhesive gels for chronic pain management therapies
- 5.5. Use of wireless sensors in buccal patches for real-time monitoring of patient drug compliance
- 5.6. Implementation of cyclic peptide-based carriers to improve stability of buccal vaccine delivery
- 5.7. Regulatory challenges and harmonization efforts impacting novel buccal drug delivery approvals
- 5.8. Growth in chronic disease management using transbuccal delivery of peptide and small molecule drugs
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Films
- 8.1.1. Cellulose Derivatives
- 8.1.2. Natural Polymers
- 8.1.3. Synthetic Polymers
- 8.2. Gels
- 8.2.1. Hydrogels
- 8.2.2. Organogels
- 8.3. Patches
- 8.3.1. Adhesive Patches
- 8.3.2. Matrix Patches
- 8.4. Sprays
- 8.4.1. Multi Actuation
- 8.4.2. Single Actuation
- 8.5. Tablets
- 8.5.1. Chewable Tablets
- 8.5.2. Lozenges
- 8.5.3. Mucoadhesive Tablets
- 9. Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market, by Drug Class
- 9.1. Analgesics
- 9.1.1. Buprenorphine
- 9.1.2. Fentanyl
- 9.2. Cardiovascular
- 9.3. Central Nervous System
- 9.4. Hormones
- 9.4.1. Estradiol
- 9.4.2. Testosterone
- 10. Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market, by Application
- 10.1. Cardiovascular Treatment
- 10.2. Hormone Therapy
- 10.3. Pain Management
- 10.4. Psychiatry
- 11. Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market, by End User
- 11.1. Clinics
- 11.2. Home Care
- 11.3. Hospitals
- 12. Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Hospital Pharmacy
- 12.2. Online Pharmacy
- 12.3. Retail Pharmacy
- 13. Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Buccal Drug Delivery Systems Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Adare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
- 16.3.2. Applied Pharma Research SA
- 16.3.3. AstraZeneca plc
- 16.3.4. Bausch Health Companies Inc.
- 16.3.5. Bayer AG
- 16.3.6. BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.
- 16.3.7. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd.
- 16.3.8. Endo International plc
- 16.3.9. Ethypharm SAS
- 16.3.10. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
- 16.3.11. GlaxoSmithKline plc
- 16.3.12. Johnson & Johnson
- 16.3.13. Medlab Clinical Ltd.
- 16.3.14. NAPP Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
- 16.3.15. Novartis AG
- 16.3.16. Novo Nordisk A/S
- 16.3.17. Perrigo Company plc
- 16.3.18. Pfizer Inc.
- 16.3.19. Roche Holding AG
- 16.3.20. Sanofi SA
- 16.3.21. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
- 16.3.22. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
- 16.3.23. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
- 16.3.24. Viatris Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
