Brewery Equipment Market by Equipment Type (Brewhouse Equipment, Fermentation Equipment, Conditioning & Storage Equipment), Mode of Operation (Automatic, Manual, Semi-Automatic), Brewery Type, Material Type, Product Condition, End User, Distribution Chann
Description
The Brewery Equipment Market was valued at USD 25.18 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 26.65 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.00%, reaching USD 37.88 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to the evolving brewery equipment ecosystem that frames technological priorities, operational objectives, and partnership trends for strategic decision-makers
The brewery equipment landscape is experiencing a period of accelerated transformation driven by technological progress, changing consumer preferences, and an elevated emphasis on operational resilience. This executive summary opens with a focused introduction to the forces reshaping equipment selection, factory design, and supplier relationships across the US brewing ecosystem. Attention to cleaning efficiency, thermal management, fermentation control, filtration precision, and packaging reliability now compete with demands for modularity, energy efficiency, and digital integration. Consequently, capital planners and plant managers find themselves balancing the imperatives of product quality, throughput, and sustainability against constrained timelines and evolving regulatory expectations.
Across the production continuum, decision-makers are prioritizing systems that reduce downtime, simplify validation, and integrate with enterprise resource planning and manufacturing execution systems. The interplay between equipment vendors, integrators, and end users is shifting from transactional procurement toward long-term service partnerships that include predictive maintenance, spare parts optimization, and remote performance monitoring. As the industry advances, a clearer picture is emerging: success will favor operators who adopt a systems-oriented approach that aligns process engineering, automation, and lifecycle services with brand strategy and customer expectations.
How automation, sustainability priorities, supply-chain resilience, and service-driven supplier models are jointly reshaping brewery equipment procurement and operations
The brewery equipment landscape is undergoing several transformative shifts that are redefining investment priorities and operational models. First, digitalization and automation are moving from pilot projects into mainstream deployment, enabling more consistent product quality and more efficient labor allocation. Secondly, sustainability drivers are catalyzing equipment choices that minimize water and energy consumption while supporting waste valorization and carbon footprint reduction. Thirdly, the supply chain paradigm has changed; lead-time variability and component scarcity are prompting buyers to prefer modular, standardized subsystems that can be sourced from multiple suppliers and quickly installed with minimal rework.
Additionally, the competitive environment is encouraging faster time-to-market for seasonal and small-batch releases, which in turn fuels demand for flexible fermentation, filtration, and packaging solutions. Technology convergence is also notable, as advancements in process sensors, control algorithms, and remote diagnostics are integrated directly into vessels, chillers, and packaging lines. Finally, service models are evolving from warranty-limited offerings to subscription and outcome-based contracts that align vendor incentives with plant uptime and throughput, creating a more collaborative supplier-buyer dynamic that rewards continuous improvement and strategic alignment.
Strategic procurement, nearshoring, and supply resilience responses prompted by tariff changes and their operational implications for brewery equipment sourcing
The introduction of new tariff measures in 2025 has injected an additional strategic consideration into equipment sourcing decisions for US brewers. Firms are now reassessing supplier footprints, exploring nearshoring options, and re-evaluating total landed cost assumptions in project plans. The immediate implications include tighter procurement windows, renegotiation of contractual terms to account for duty exposure, and a renewed focus on domestic engineering and fabrication capabilities to hedge against external trade-policy fluctuations.
In response, many operators are accelerating vendor diversification, increasing inventory buffers for long-lead components, and expanding collaboration with local fabricators for bespoke tanks and structural elements. These adjustments are not merely tactical; they are reshaping capital planning horizons and driving closer integration between procurement, engineering, and finance teams. Over time, the policy shift will likely incentivize greater investment in local supply capabilities and aftermarket services, which can improve responsiveness and reduce exposure to tariff-induced cost volatility. Consequently, successful operators will be those that translate short-term mitigation measures into medium-term supply-chain resilience and capability-building initiatives.
Insightful segmentation framing that links equipment types, material choices, brewery scale, automation levels, and distribution pathways to procurement and operational outcomes
A nuanced segmentation approach reveals where value and risk concentrate across equipment types, materials, brewery scales, automation levels, and distribution pathways. Equipment-level differentiation spans Brewing System, Cleaning System, Cooling System, Fermentation Equipment, Filtration System, Packaging System, and Storage Tanks, and attention to subcomponents matters: Cleaning System choices distinguish between CIP systems and sterilization systems, Cooling System options include chillers, glycol systems, and heat exchangers, Filtration System selections range from cartridge filters, centrifuges, diatomaceous earth filters, to membrane filters, and Packaging System assemblies encompass capping machines, conveyors, filling machines, and labeling machines. Materials remain a core driver of durability and process compatibility, with copper, glass-lined, plastic, and stainless steel each presenting trade-offs among longevity, sanitary properties, corrosion resistance, and capital intensity.
Scale-focused segmentation highlights divergent priorities among large breweries, medium breweries, and small breweries. Large breweries prioritize automation, redundancy, and throughput while integrating advanced MES and CBM capabilities. Medium breweries often seek modular, scalable equipment that supports mixed production profiles and seasonal peaks without overcommitting capital. Small breweries favor flexibility and lower up-front costs, opting for equipment that simplifies cleaning and changeover. Automation-level segmentation-fully automated, semi-automated, and manual systems-clarifies where labor savings, consistency, and upskilling are most impactful. Finally, distribution channels such as offline and online influence how equipment vendors present service propositions, technical documentation, and spare parts logistics, shaping buyer experience and post-sale support expectations.
These intersecting segments inform product development, aftermarket service design, and commercial strategies. For suppliers, aligning technical roadmaps and service portfolios to specific material-technology combinations and brewery scales creates differentiated value. For operators, mapping capital projects to the most relevant segments reduces integration risk and accelerates return on operational improvements.
Regional supply, engineering capability, and service network contrasts across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence sourcing strategy and project risk
Regional dynamics shape equipment availability, service ecosystems, and regulatory expectations across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, creating distinct operational horizons for US stakeholders. The Americas region supports robust domestic manufacturing and a mature aftersales network, enabling relatively short lead times for fabricated tanks, control cabinets, and field services. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa offers deep engineering expertise in specialized process equipment and advanced refrigeration technologies, which can complement domestic capabilities for high-precision installations and sustainability-focused retrofits.
Asia-Pacific continues to be a critical source of cost-competitive components and complete packaging lines, presenting attractive options for standardized modules but also requiring careful validation for compatibility and serviceability. Geographic considerations also affect compliance standards, spare parts pipelines, and the density of certified integrators, which in turn influence total project risk. For US operators, the optimal regional mix often blends domestic fabrication for lead-time-sensitive and customized elements with selected international suppliers for standardized, cost-effective subsystems, all while ensuring robust service agreements that mitigate long-distance logistical and maintenance exposure.
How leading equipment providers are competing through integrated platforms, expanded service footprints, and lifecycle-focused commercial models to win brewery customers
Competitive positioning among leading equipment providers is driven by product breadth, standards compliance, aftermarket capabilities, and the ability to offer digital services that demonstrably reduce downtime. Key companies differentiate through platform-based solutions that integrate control hardware, analytics, and remote diagnostics with service-level commitments, thereby aligning commercial incentives with operational outcomes. Strategic moves such as forming OEM partnerships, expanding local manufacturing footprints, and developing certified installer networks are common as vendors seek to lower implementation friction and accelerate adoption.
Moreover, top-tier suppliers increasingly present bundled propositions that combine equipment, spare parts agreements, training programs, and performance-based service options. These bundled approaches simplify procurement and place greater emphasis on lifecycle economics rather than first cost alone. In addition, niche suppliers specializing in filtration, heat exchange, or specialized fermentation vessels continue to thrive by offering highly engineered solutions for specific quality or process requirements. For buyers, supplier selection now requires a rigorous assessment of technical fit, service capability, integration experience, and the vendor’s capacity to support long-term process improvements and regulatory compliance.
Practical and prioritized actions for brewery equipment buyers to strengthen resilience, accelerate automation, and align vendor partnerships with operational outcomes
Industry leaders should prioritize a strategic agenda that balances short-term resilience with long-term capability building. Begin by formalizing supply-chain contingency plans that combine diversified sourcing, qualified local fabrication partners, and prioritized inventory for critical long-lead items. Concurrently, accelerate investment in automation modules and digital monitoring to reduce variability and improve labor productivity while structuring technology deployments around modularity and interoperability to protect future flexibility.
Leaders should also renegotiate service contracts to emphasize uptime metrics and access to remote diagnostics, shifting vendor relationships toward outcome-based frameworks. From a capital perspective, adopt phased upgrade approaches that allow medium and small breweries to scale functionality over time while enabling larger operations to deploy redundancy where it yields the most return. Finally, invest in workforce development and cross-functional teams that link production, maintenance, procurement, and finance to ensure decisions reflect both process engineering realities and commercial constraints. By executing on these priorities, organizations can transform short-term policy and supply shocks into permanent advantages in uptime, cost control, and product consistency.
A transparent, triangulated research approach combining practitioner interviews, technical review, and supply-chain diagnostics to underpin practical and reproducible conclusions
This research is grounded in a triangulated methodology combining primary interviews, technical literature review, and supply-chain diagnostic analysis to ensure robust, actionable conclusions. Primary inputs were obtained through structured interviews with plant engineers, procurement leaders, OEM product managers, and integration specialists to capture real-world implementation challenges and supplier performance feedback. These qualitative inputs were supplemented by technical documentation, standards guidance, and observed case studies to verify equipment capabilities, service model evolution, and interoperability constraints.
Supply-chain diagnostic analysis examined lead-time patterns, component criticality, and regional fabrication capacities to identify practical mitigation steps and sourcing alternatives. Throughout the process, findings were validated through cross-checks with multiple practitioner sources to reduce bias and ensure representativeness. The approach emphasizes transparency and reproducibility, documenting assumptions about technological capability, service model structures, and regulatory contexts so that readers can adapt conclusions to their own operational parameters and capital planning processes.
A conclusive synthesis of strategic imperatives for brewery operators to capture technology benefits while managing supply-chain and policy-driven complexities
The cumulative picture for US breweries and their equipment partners is one of opportunity tempered by complexity. Technological trends-automation, digital analytics, and modular engineering-offer clear pathways to improved product quality, throughput, and sustainability. At the same time, trade policy shifts, supply-chain variability, and diverse regional capabilities require a more sophisticated sourcing playbook that balances domestic fabrication with selective international procurement. Operators that adopt modular designs, deepen supplier relationships through outcome-based service models, and invest in workforce capability will gain sustained operational advantage.
In closing, success in this environment will come from disciplined execution: define clear equipment performance objectives, match vendor capabilities to those objectives, and protect project timelines through contingency planning and local capability development. By doing so, breweries can convert current headwinds into competitive differentiation and reliable production platforms that support brand growth and innovation.
A concise orientation to the evolving brewery equipment ecosystem that frames technological priorities, operational objectives, and partnership trends for strategic decision-makers
The brewery equipment landscape is experiencing a period of accelerated transformation driven by technological progress, changing consumer preferences, and an elevated emphasis on operational resilience. This executive summary opens with a focused introduction to the forces reshaping equipment selection, factory design, and supplier relationships across the US brewing ecosystem. Attention to cleaning efficiency, thermal management, fermentation control, filtration precision, and packaging reliability now compete with demands for modularity, energy efficiency, and digital integration. Consequently, capital planners and plant managers find themselves balancing the imperatives of product quality, throughput, and sustainability against constrained timelines and evolving regulatory expectations.
Across the production continuum, decision-makers are prioritizing systems that reduce downtime, simplify validation, and integrate with enterprise resource planning and manufacturing execution systems. The interplay between equipment vendors, integrators, and end users is shifting from transactional procurement toward long-term service partnerships that include predictive maintenance, spare parts optimization, and remote performance monitoring. As the industry advances, a clearer picture is emerging: success will favor operators who adopt a systems-oriented approach that aligns process engineering, automation, and lifecycle services with brand strategy and customer expectations.
How automation, sustainability priorities, supply-chain resilience, and service-driven supplier models are jointly reshaping brewery equipment procurement and operations
The brewery equipment landscape is undergoing several transformative shifts that are redefining investment priorities and operational models. First, digitalization and automation are moving from pilot projects into mainstream deployment, enabling more consistent product quality and more efficient labor allocation. Secondly, sustainability drivers are catalyzing equipment choices that minimize water and energy consumption while supporting waste valorization and carbon footprint reduction. Thirdly, the supply chain paradigm has changed; lead-time variability and component scarcity are prompting buyers to prefer modular, standardized subsystems that can be sourced from multiple suppliers and quickly installed with minimal rework.
Additionally, the competitive environment is encouraging faster time-to-market for seasonal and small-batch releases, which in turn fuels demand for flexible fermentation, filtration, and packaging solutions. Technology convergence is also notable, as advancements in process sensors, control algorithms, and remote diagnostics are integrated directly into vessels, chillers, and packaging lines. Finally, service models are evolving from warranty-limited offerings to subscription and outcome-based contracts that align vendor incentives with plant uptime and throughput, creating a more collaborative supplier-buyer dynamic that rewards continuous improvement and strategic alignment.
Strategic procurement, nearshoring, and supply resilience responses prompted by tariff changes and their operational implications for brewery equipment sourcing
The introduction of new tariff measures in 2025 has injected an additional strategic consideration into equipment sourcing decisions for US brewers. Firms are now reassessing supplier footprints, exploring nearshoring options, and re-evaluating total landed cost assumptions in project plans. The immediate implications include tighter procurement windows, renegotiation of contractual terms to account for duty exposure, and a renewed focus on domestic engineering and fabrication capabilities to hedge against external trade-policy fluctuations.
In response, many operators are accelerating vendor diversification, increasing inventory buffers for long-lead components, and expanding collaboration with local fabricators for bespoke tanks and structural elements. These adjustments are not merely tactical; they are reshaping capital planning horizons and driving closer integration between procurement, engineering, and finance teams. Over time, the policy shift will likely incentivize greater investment in local supply capabilities and aftermarket services, which can improve responsiveness and reduce exposure to tariff-induced cost volatility. Consequently, successful operators will be those that translate short-term mitigation measures into medium-term supply-chain resilience and capability-building initiatives.
Insightful segmentation framing that links equipment types, material choices, brewery scale, automation levels, and distribution pathways to procurement and operational outcomes
A nuanced segmentation approach reveals where value and risk concentrate across equipment types, materials, brewery scales, automation levels, and distribution pathways. Equipment-level differentiation spans Brewing System, Cleaning System, Cooling System, Fermentation Equipment, Filtration System, Packaging System, and Storage Tanks, and attention to subcomponents matters: Cleaning System choices distinguish between CIP systems and sterilization systems, Cooling System options include chillers, glycol systems, and heat exchangers, Filtration System selections range from cartridge filters, centrifuges, diatomaceous earth filters, to membrane filters, and Packaging System assemblies encompass capping machines, conveyors, filling machines, and labeling machines. Materials remain a core driver of durability and process compatibility, with copper, glass-lined, plastic, and stainless steel each presenting trade-offs among longevity, sanitary properties, corrosion resistance, and capital intensity.
Scale-focused segmentation highlights divergent priorities among large breweries, medium breweries, and small breweries. Large breweries prioritize automation, redundancy, and throughput while integrating advanced MES and CBM capabilities. Medium breweries often seek modular, scalable equipment that supports mixed production profiles and seasonal peaks without overcommitting capital. Small breweries favor flexibility and lower up-front costs, opting for equipment that simplifies cleaning and changeover. Automation-level segmentation-fully automated, semi-automated, and manual systems-clarifies where labor savings, consistency, and upskilling are most impactful. Finally, distribution channels such as offline and online influence how equipment vendors present service propositions, technical documentation, and spare parts logistics, shaping buyer experience and post-sale support expectations.
These intersecting segments inform product development, aftermarket service design, and commercial strategies. For suppliers, aligning technical roadmaps and service portfolios to specific material-technology combinations and brewery scales creates differentiated value. For operators, mapping capital projects to the most relevant segments reduces integration risk and accelerates return on operational improvements.
Regional supply, engineering capability, and service network contrasts across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence sourcing strategy and project risk
Regional dynamics shape equipment availability, service ecosystems, and regulatory expectations across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, creating distinct operational horizons for US stakeholders. The Americas region supports robust domestic manufacturing and a mature aftersales network, enabling relatively short lead times for fabricated tanks, control cabinets, and field services. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa offers deep engineering expertise in specialized process equipment and advanced refrigeration technologies, which can complement domestic capabilities for high-precision installations and sustainability-focused retrofits.
Asia-Pacific continues to be a critical source of cost-competitive components and complete packaging lines, presenting attractive options for standardized modules but also requiring careful validation for compatibility and serviceability. Geographic considerations also affect compliance standards, spare parts pipelines, and the density of certified integrators, which in turn influence total project risk. For US operators, the optimal regional mix often blends domestic fabrication for lead-time-sensitive and customized elements with selected international suppliers for standardized, cost-effective subsystems, all while ensuring robust service agreements that mitigate long-distance logistical and maintenance exposure.
How leading equipment providers are competing through integrated platforms, expanded service footprints, and lifecycle-focused commercial models to win brewery customers
Competitive positioning among leading equipment providers is driven by product breadth, standards compliance, aftermarket capabilities, and the ability to offer digital services that demonstrably reduce downtime. Key companies differentiate through platform-based solutions that integrate control hardware, analytics, and remote diagnostics with service-level commitments, thereby aligning commercial incentives with operational outcomes. Strategic moves such as forming OEM partnerships, expanding local manufacturing footprints, and developing certified installer networks are common as vendors seek to lower implementation friction and accelerate adoption.
Moreover, top-tier suppliers increasingly present bundled propositions that combine equipment, spare parts agreements, training programs, and performance-based service options. These bundled approaches simplify procurement and place greater emphasis on lifecycle economics rather than first cost alone. In addition, niche suppliers specializing in filtration, heat exchange, or specialized fermentation vessels continue to thrive by offering highly engineered solutions for specific quality or process requirements. For buyers, supplier selection now requires a rigorous assessment of technical fit, service capability, integration experience, and the vendor’s capacity to support long-term process improvements and regulatory compliance.
Practical and prioritized actions for brewery equipment buyers to strengthen resilience, accelerate automation, and align vendor partnerships with operational outcomes
Industry leaders should prioritize a strategic agenda that balances short-term resilience with long-term capability building. Begin by formalizing supply-chain contingency plans that combine diversified sourcing, qualified local fabrication partners, and prioritized inventory for critical long-lead items. Concurrently, accelerate investment in automation modules and digital monitoring to reduce variability and improve labor productivity while structuring technology deployments around modularity and interoperability to protect future flexibility.
Leaders should also renegotiate service contracts to emphasize uptime metrics and access to remote diagnostics, shifting vendor relationships toward outcome-based frameworks. From a capital perspective, adopt phased upgrade approaches that allow medium and small breweries to scale functionality over time while enabling larger operations to deploy redundancy where it yields the most return. Finally, invest in workforce development and cross-functional teams that link production, maintenance, procurement, and finance to ensure decisions reflect both process engineering realities and commercial constraints. By executing on these priorities, organizations can transform short-term policy and supply shocks into permanent advantages in uptime, cost control, and product consistency.
A transparent, triangulated research approach combining practitioner interviews, technical review, and supply-chain diagnostics to underpin practical and reproducible conclusions
This research is grounded in a triangulated methodology combining primary interviews, technical literature review, and supply-chain diagnostic analysis to ensure robust, actionable conclusions. Primary inputs were obtained through structured interviews with plant engineers, procurement leaders, OEM product managers, and integration specialists to capture real-world implementation challenges and supplier performance feedback. These qualitative inputs were supplemented by technical documentation, standards guidance, and observed case studies to verify equipment capabilities, service model evolution, and interoperability constraints.
Supply-chain diagnostic analysis examined lead-time patterns, component criticality, and regional fabrication capacities to identify practical mitigation steps and sourcing alternatives. Throughout the process, findings were validated through cross-checks with multiple practitioner sources to reduce bias and ensure representativeness. The approach emphasizes transparency and reproducibility, documenting assumptions about technological capability, service model structures, and regulatory contexts so that readers can adapt conclusions to their own operational parameters and capital planning processes.
A conclusive synthesis of strategic imperatives for brewery operators to capture technology benefits while managing supply-chain and policy-driven complexities
The cumulative picture for US breweries and their equipment partners is one of opportunity tempered by complexity. Technological trends-automation, digital analytics, and modular engineering-offer clear pathways to improved product quality, throughput, and sustainability. At the same time, trade policy shifts, supply-chain variability, and diverse regional capabilities require a more sophisticated sourcing playbook that balances domestic fabrication with selective international procurement. Operators that adopt modular designs, deepen supplier relationships through outcome-based service models, and invest in workforce capability will gain sustained operational advantage.
In closing, success in this environment will come from disciplined execution: define clear equipment performance objectives, match vendor capabilities to those objectives, and protect project timelines through contingency planning and local capability development. By doing so, breweries can convert current headwinds into competitive differentiation and reliable production platforms that support brand growth and innovation.
Table of Contents
183 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Brewery Equipment Market, by Equipment Type
- 8.1. Brewhouse Equipment
- 8.1.1. Mash Tun
- 8.1.2. Hot Liquor Tank
- 8.1.3. Cold Liquor Tank
- 8.1.4. Whirlpool
- 8.2. Fermentation Equipment
- 8.2.1. Fermentation Tanks
- 8.2.2. Unitanks
- 8.3. Conditioning & Storage Equipment
- 8.3.1. Bright Beer Tanks
- 8.3.2. Aging Tanks
- 8.3.3. Serving Tanks
- 8.4. Cooling Equipment
- 8.5. Filtration & Packaging Equipment
- 8.5.1. Bottling Lines
- 8.5.2. Canning Lines
- 8.5.3. Filtration Systems
- 8.5.4. Kegging Lines
- 8.6. Cleaning & Sanitation Equipment
- 9. Brewery Equipment Market, by Mode of Operation
- 9.1. Automatic
- 9.2. Manual
- 9.3. Semi-Automatic
- 10. Brewery Equipment Market, by Brewery Type
- 10.1. Macrobreweries
- 10.2. Microbreweries
- 10.3. Craft Breweries
- 10.4. Brewpubs
- 10.5. Farm Breweries
- 10.6. Regional Breweries
- 11. Brewery Equipment Market, by Material Type
- 11.1. Aluminum
- 11.2. Copper
- 11.3. Stainless Steel
- 12. Brewery Equipment Market, by Product Condition
- 12.1. New Equipment
- 12.2. Resale / Used Equipment
- 13. Brewery Equipment Market, by End User
- 13.1. Commercial Breweries
- 13.2. Home Breweries
- 13.3. Farm Breweries
- 13.4. Educational Institutions
- 14. Brewery Equipment Market, by Distribution Channel
- 14.1. Offline
- 14.2. Online
- 15. Brewery Equipment Market, by Region
- 15.1. Americas
- 15.1.1. North America
- 15.1.2. Latin America
- 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 15.2.1. Europe
- 15.2.2. Middle East
- 15.2.3. Africa
- 15.3. Asia-Pacific
- 16. Brewery Equipment Market, by Group
- 16.1. ASEAN
- 16.2. GCC
- 16.3. European Union
- 16.4. BRICS
- 16.5. G7
- 16.6. NATO
- 17. Brewery Equipment Market, by Country
- 17.1. United States
- 17.2. Canada
- 17.3. Mexico
- 17.4. Brazil
- 17.5. United Kingdom
- 17.6. Germany
- 17.7. France
- 17.8. Russia
- 17.9. Italy
- 17.10. Spain
- 17.11. China
- 17.12. India
- 17.13. Japan
- 17.14. Australia
- 17.15. South Korea
- 18. United States Brewery Equipment Market
- 19. China Brewery Equipment Market
- 20. Competitive Landscape
- 20.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 20.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 20.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 20.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 20.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 20.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 20.5. GEA Group AG
- 20.6. Alfa Laval AB
- 20.7. Krones AG
- 20.8. Praj Industries Limited
- 20.9. Paul Mueller Company
- 20.10. Omnia Della Toffola SpA
- 20.11. Meura S.A.
- 20.12. Shandong HG Machinery Co., Ltd.
- 20.13. Hypro Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
- 20.14. ABE Equipment by Norland International
- 20.15. Criveller Group
- 20.16. ANVIL BREWING
- 20.17. Blichmann Engineering
- 20.18. BrauKon GmbH
- 20.19. GW Kent Inc.
- 20.20. HERMANN
- 20.21. Kaspar Schulz Brauereimaschinenfabrik & Apparatebauanstalt Gmbh
- 20.22. Lehui Finnah India Engineering
- 20.23. Shanghai Hengcheng Beverage Equipment Co., Ltd.
- 20.24. TechniBlend, Inc.
- 20.25. Tiantai Beer Equipment Co., Ltd.
- 20.26. YoLong Brewtech
- 20.27. Yucheng Zeyu Machinery Co. Ltd.
- 20.28. Ziemann Holvrieka GmbH
- FIGURE 1. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 2. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
- FIGURE 3. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
- FIGURE 4. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 5. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY MODE OF OPERATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 6. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY BREWERY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 7. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 8. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT CONDITION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 9. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 10. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 11. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 12. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 13. GLOBAL BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 14. UNITED STATES BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 15. CHINA BREWERY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.


