Boat & Ship MRO Market by Service Type (Inspection & Diagnostics, Maintenance, Overhaul & Refit), Maintenance Type (Dry Dock Maintenance, In-Situ Maintenance), Component, Maintenance Strategy, Vessel Type, Service Provider, End User - Global Forecast 2026
Description
The Boat & Ship MRO Market was valued at USD 124.57 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 131.46 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.69%, reaching USD 183.62 billion by 2032.
An authoritative framing of the boat and ship MRO operating environment that highlights intersecting forces redefining maintenance priorities across fleets and facilities
The contemporary boat and ship maintenance, repair, and overhaul environment is undergoing a rapid evolution driven by technological, regulatory, and commercial forces that demand a fresh executive perspective. This introduction frames the operational and strategic context in which maintenance decisions are being made, highlighting the convergence of digital enablement, sustainability priorities, and changing supply chain dynamics that are reshaping repair workflows and vendor relationships.
Leaders must consider how their maintenance strategies align with broader fleet objectives, including lifecycle extension, regulatory compliance, and operational readiness. Moving forward, organizations will need to reconcile traditional dry dock cycles with increasing demands for in-situ interventions while balancing cost, safety, and downtime. This introduction sets the stage for deeper analysis by outlining the principal vectors of change and by clarifying why timely, evidence-based decisions now yield disproportionately better outcomes for fleet operators, shipyards, and maintenance service providers.
How digitalization, electrification, regulatory pressures, and workforce transformation are jointly reshaping repair modalities and commercial models in maritime maintenance
The landscape is experiencing transformative shifts that go beyond incremental improvement; these changes are altering how maintenance is planned, executed, and monetized. Digitalization has moved from experimental pilots to operational expectations, with condition monitoring and predictive analytics enabling maintenance regimes that minimize unplanned downtime and prioritize asset availability. At the same time, electrification and alternative propulsion technologies are altering component lifecycles and service skill sets, requiring new diagnostic tools and parts inventories.
Concurrently, sustainability and regulatory compliance are imposing more rigorous inspection cycles and documentation standards, prompting integration of traceability and reporting capabilities into maintenance workflows. Workforce dynamics are shifting as well, with a premium on cross-disciplinary technicians who can operate digital diagnostic systems alongside traditional mechanical tasks. Together, these shifts are forcing organizations to rethink supplier relationships, training programs, and capital allocation to ensure resilience and competitiveness in a rapidly evolving market.
Assessing the cumulative operational and procurement consequences of United States tariff measures implemented in 2025 and their strategic implications for supply chain resilience
Policy interventions and trade measures introduced in 2025 have had an observable ripple effect across procurement, inventory planning, and supplier selection. Tariffs have increased the cost sensitivity of imported spare parts and specialized equipment, prompting operators to reevaluate total landed costs and to accelerate localization of critical supply chains where possible. As a result, buyers are placing higher value on supplier reliability, lead time certainty, and availability of certified aftermarket alternatives.
In response, maintenance planners are adjusting sourcing strategies to include greater dual-sourcing, increased buffer inventories for high-criticality components, and longer-term contracts that embed service-level assurances. These adaptations are reshaping the commercial contracting landscape and elevating the importance of parts certification and interoperability. Moving forward, decision-makers will need to weigh the trade-offs between short-term cost impacts and medium-term operational resilience when designing maintenance and procurement strategies.
Deep segmentation insights revealing how service type, maintenance modality, component specialization, and vessel class drive distinct operational and commercial requirements
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated demand patterns and capability requirements that should guide investment and go-to-market strategies. Based on Service Type, market behavior distinguishes between Corrective Maintenance and Predictive Maintenance, with corrective interventions remaining essential for unplanned failures while predictive approaches gain traction through condition-based monitoring and data analytics. Based on Maintenance Type, choices between Dry Dock Maintenance and In-Situ Maintenance influence capital planning, logistical coordination, and the configuration of onsite teams, with each modality offering distinct cost and downtime profiles.
Based on Component, service requirements vary across Electrical Systems, Engine, and Hull, where Electrical Systems include Communication Systems and Navigation Equipment that increasingly require software and firmware upkeep; Engine work spans Diesel Engine, Electric Propulsion, and Gas Turbine Engine, each presenting unique parts and skills considerations; and Hull maintenance includes Fabrication and Structural Repair that demand specialized welding, coating, and inspection capabilities. Based on Vessel Type, client needs differ among Commercial Vessel, Leisure Boat, and Military Vessel, with Commercial Vessel work covering Bulk Carrier, Container Ship, and Tanker classes that prioritize throughput and regulatory inspection readiness, while Leisure Boat work across Fishing Boat, Sailboat, and Yacht segments often emphasizes owner experience and aesthetics. Understanding these segmentation vectors enables providers to tailor service bundles, warranty structures, and training programs to the technical and commercial realities of each subsegment.
Regional intelligence that contrasts procurement, compliance, and service delivery priorities across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific to inform investment choices
Regional dynamics produce distinct priorities for maintenance providers and fleet operators that reflect regulatory regimes, shipbuilding concentrations, and logistical infrastructures. In the Americas, emphasis often lies on optimizing long-haul commercial operations and supporting leisure boating ecosystems with flexible in-situ capabilities and vendor networks that can respond to seasonal demand swings. Operators and suppliers in the Americas increasingly prioritize rapid turnaround, certification compliance, and integration of digital diagnostic tools to sustain transcontinental logistics flows.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, fragmentation of regulatory frameworks and the density of legacy ports create an environment where harmonized inspection standards and interoperability of parts are particularly valuable. In this region, sustainability mandates and emissions targets have heightened demand for propulsion retrofits and alternative fuels readiness. In Asia-Pacific, the concentration of shipbuilding and a vast commercial fleet drive scale advantages in component manufacturing and aftermarket services, while growth in leisure boating and regional naval modernization programs raise demand for specialized dockyard capabilities and advanced repair techniques. Recognizing the differentiated drivers in each region is essential for tailoring commercial models, inventory strategies, and training investments.
How competitive strategies and partner ecosystems among leading service providers and specialists are redefining capability stacks and geographic delivery models
Competitive and collaborative behaviors among key companies are reshaping service portfolios, partnership models, and technology adoption in maintenance ecosystems. Leading providers are investing in integrated service platforms that combine diagnostics, predictive analytics, and field execution to reduce mean time to repair and to increase visibility across multi-vessel fleets. Strategic partnerships between OEMs, software vendors, and tiered service suppliers are becoming more common as a way to combine deep component expertise with scalable delivery networks.
At the same time, smaller specialized providers are capitalizing on niche capabilities such as advanced hull fabrication, high-voltage electrical work, and propulsion conversions, often forming alliances with larger firms to extend geographic reach. The competitive landscape is therefore characterized by both consolidation around full-service offerings and continued demand for specialized expertise, making collaboration and capability mapping critical for companies that wish to defend or expand their market positions.
Actionable strategic priorities for maintenance leaders to accelerate digital adoption, secure supply chains, and realign workforce capabilities for resilient operations
Industry leaders should take decisive actions to align their operational models with changing technology, regulatory, and supply chain realities. Prioritize the adoption of condition-based maintenance systems and invest in data integration platforms that consolidate diagnostics, inventory, and workflow management, thereby enabling more accurate scheduling and reduced unscheduled downtime. Simultaneously, enhance supply chain resilience by diversifying supplier bases for critical spares, formalizing second-source agreements, and negotiating service-level commitments that include lead-time penalties and parts traceability.
Develop an upskilling roadmap for technicians that blends digital diagnostics, safety protocols, and advanced repair techniques, and embed certification pathways to retain skilled labor. Finally, reconfigure contracting approaches to offer modular service packages tailored to vessel class and component complexity, while piloting commercial models that align incentives between operators and service providers for availability and lifecycle performance.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, documentary analysis, and scenario-based supply chain stress testing to validate operational insights
This research synthesizes qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, technical SMEs, and procurement leaders alongside a systematic review of regulatory documents, industry standards, and public trade measures. Primary inputs were triangulated with secondary evidence such as supplier catalogs, technical whitepapers, and case studies of recent retrofit and repair programs to ensure a comprehensive understanding of operational practices and commercial arrangements.
Analytical methods combined thematic coding of interview transcripts with capability mapping and scenario-based supply chain stress testing to evaluate vulnerability points and adaptive strategies. Wherever possible, findings were corroborated by multiple independent sources to reduce bias and to ensure that recommendations are grounded in observable behavior rather than anecdote. Limitations are acknowledged where proprietary data or confidential contractual terms constrained full visibility, and recommended next steps include targeted vendor diligence and region-specific operational audits to refine applicability.
A strategic synthesis emphasizing the imperative to integrate technology, supply chain resilience, and workforce development to convert disruption into competitive advantage
In conclusion, the boat and ship MRO environment is at an inflection point where technological adoption, regulatory shifts, and trade policy developments intersect to create both risk and opportunity. Firms that proactively integrate predictive maintenance capabilities, reinforce supply chain continuity, and cultivate a digitally skilled workforce will be best positioned to preserve operational availability and to capture growing demand for advanced repair services. The strategic choices made now will determine whether organizations achieve sustainable cost reductions and superior fleet readiness or simply respond reactively to disruptions.
Decision-makers should therefore prioritize investments that deliver near-term resilience while building the foundations for longer-term transformation. By aligning procurement, training, and technology strategies, operators and service providers can convert disruption into competitive advantage and ensure that fleets remain safe, compliant, and mission-capable.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative framing of the boat and ship MRO operating environment that highlights intersecting forces redefining maintenance priorities across fleets and facilities
The contemporary boat and ship maintenance, repair, and overhaul environment is undergoing a rapid evolution driven by technological, regulatory, and commercial forces that demand a fresh executive perspective. This introduction frames the operational and strategic context in which maintenance decisions are being made, highlighting the convergence of digital enablement, sustainability priorities, and changing supply chain dynamics that are reshaping repair workflows and vendor relationships.
Leaders must consider how their maintenance strategies align with broader fleet objectives, including lifecycle extension, regulatory compliance, and operational readiness. Moving forward, organizations will need to reconcile traditional dry dock cycles with increasing demands for in-situ interventions while balancing cost, safety, and downtime. This introduction sets the stage for deeper analysis by outlining the principal vectors of change and by clarifying why timely, evidence-based decisions now yield disproportionately better outcomes for fleet operators, shipyards, and maintenance service providers.
How digitalization, electrification, regulatory pressures, and workforce transformation are jointly reshaping repair modalities and commercial models in maritime maintenance
The landscape is experiencing transformative shifts that go beyond incremental improvement; these changes are altering how maintenance is planned, executed, and monetized. Digitalization has moved from experimental pilots to operational expectations, with condition monitoring and predictive analytics enabling maintenance regimes that minimize unplanned downtime and prioritize asset availability. At the same time, electrification and alternative propulsion technologies are altering component lifecycles and service skill sets, requiring new diagnostic tools and parts inventories.
Concurrently, sustainability and regulatory compliance are imposing more rigorous inspection cycles and documentation standards, prompting integration of traceability and reporting capabilities into maintenance workflows. Workforce dynamics are shifting as well, with a premium on cross-disciplinary technicians who can operate digital diagnostic systems alongside traditional mechanical tasks. Together, these shifts are forcing organizations to rethink supplier relationships, training programs, and capital allocation to ensure resilience and competitiveness in a rapidly evolving market.
Assessing the cumulative operational and procurement consequences of United States tariff measures implemented in 2025 and their strategic implications for supply chain resilience
Policy interventions and trade measures introduced in 2025 have had an observable ripple effect across procurement, inventory planning, and supplier selection. Tariffs have increased the cost sensitivity of imported spare parts and specialized equipment, prompting operators to reevaluate total landed costs and to accelerate localization of critical supply chains where possible. As a result, buyers are placing higher value on supplier reliability, lead time certainty, and availability of certified aftermarket alternatives.
In response, maintenance planners are adjusting sourcing strategies to include greater dual-sourcing, increased buffer inventories for high-criticality components, and longer-term contracts that embed service-level assurances. These adaptations are reshaping the commercial contracting landscape and elevating the importance of parts certification and interoperability. Moving forward, decision-makers will need to weigh the trade-offs between short-term cost impacts and medium-term operational resilience when designing maintenance and procurement strategies.
Deep segmentation insights revealing how service type, maintenance modality, component specialization, and vessel class drive distinct operational and commercial requirements
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated demand patterns and capability requirements that should guide investment and go-to-market strategies. Based on Service Type, market behavior distinguishes between Corrective Maintenance and Predictive Maintenance, with corrective interventions remaining essential for unplanned failures while predictive approaches gain traction through condition-based monitoring and data analytics. Based on Maintenance Type, choices between Dry Dock Maintenance and In-Situ Maintenance influence capital planning, logistical coordination, and the configuration of onsite teams, with each modality offering distinct cost and downtime profiles.
Based on Component, service requirements vary across Electrical Systems, Engine, and Hull, where Electrical Systems include Communication Systems and Navigation Equipment that increasingly require software and firmware upkeep; Engine work spans Diesel Engine, Electric Propulsion, and Gas Turbine Engine, each presenting unique parts and skills considerations; and Hull maintenance includes Fabrication and Structural Repair that demand specialized welding, coating, and inspection capabilities. Based on Vessel Type, client needs differ among Commercial Vessel, Leisure Boat, and Military Vessel, with Commercial Vessel work covering Bulk Carrier, Container Ship, and Tanker classes that prioritize throughput and regulatory inspection readiness, while Leisure Boat work across Fishing Boat, Sailboat, and Yacht segments often emphasizes owner experience and aesthetics. Understanding these segmentation vectors enables providers to tailor service bundles, warranty structures, and training programs to the technical and commercial realities of each subsegment.
Regional intelligence that contrasts procurement, compliance, and service delivery priorities across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific to inform investment choices
Regional dynamics produce distinct priorities for maintenance providers and fleet operators that reflect regulatory regimes, shipbuilding concentrations, and logistical infrastructures. In the Americas, emphasis often lies on optimizing long-haul commercial operations and supporting leisure boating ecosystems with flexible in-situ capabilities and vendor networks that can respond to seasonal demand swings. Operators and suppliers in the Americas increasingly prioritize rapid turnaround, certification compliance, and integration of digital diagnostic tools to sustain transcontinental logistics flows.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, fragmentation of regulatory frameworks and the density of legacy ports create an environment where harmonized inspection standards and interoperability of parts are particularly valuable. In this region, sustainability mandates and emissions targets have heightened demand for propulsion retrofits and alternative fuels readiness. In Asia-Pacific, the concentration of shipbuilding and a vast commercial fleet drive scale advantages in component manufacturing and aftermarket services, while growth in leisure boating and regional naval modernization programs raise demand for specialized dockyard capabilities and advanced repair techniques. Recognizing the differentiated drivers in each region is essential for tailoring commercial models, inventory strategies, and training investments.
How competitive strategies and partner ecosystems among leading service providers and specialists are redefining capability stacks and geographic delivery models
Competitive and collaborative behaviors among key companies are reshaping service portfolios, partnership models, and technology adoption in maintenance ecosystems. Leading providers are investing in integrated service platforms that combine diagnostics, predictive analytics, and field execution to reduce mean time to repair and to increase visibility across multi-vessel fleets. Strategic partnerships between OEMs, software vendors, and tiered service suppliers are becoming more common as a way to combine deep component expertise with scalable delivery networks.
At the same time, smaller specialized providers are capitalizing on niche capabilities such as advanced hull fabrication, high-voltage electrical work, and propulsion conversions, often forming alliances with larger firms to extend geographic reach. The competitive landscape is therefore characterized by both consolidation around full-service offerings and continued demand for specialized expertise, making collaboration and capability mapping critical for companies that wish to defend or expand their market positions.
Actionable strategic priorities for maintenance leaders to accelerate digital adoption, secure supply chains, and realign workforce capabilities for resilient operations
Industry leaders should take decisive actions to align their operational models with changing technology, regulatory, and supply chain realities. Prioritize the adoption of condition-based maintenance systems and invest in data integration platforms that consolidate diagnostics, inventory, and workflow management, thereby enabling more accurate scheduling and reduced unscheduled downtime. Simultaneously, enhance supply chain resilience by diversifying supplier bases for critical spares, formalizing second-source agreements, and negotiating service-level commitments that include lead-time penalties and parts traceability.
Develop an upskilling roadmap for technicians that blends digital diagnostics, safety protocols, and advanced repair techniques, and embed certification pathways to retain skilled labor. Finally, reconfigure contracting approaches to offer modular service packages tailored to vessel class and component complexity, while piloting commercial models that align incentives between operators and service providers for availability and lifecycle performance.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, documentary analysis, and scenario-based supply chain stress testing to validate operational insights
This research synthesizes qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, technical SMEs, and procurement leaders alongside a systematic review of regulatory documents, industry standards, and public trade measures. Primary inputs were triangulated with secondary evidence such as supplier catalogs, technical whitepapers, and case studies of recent retrofit and repair programs to ensure a comprehensive understanding of operational practices and commercial arrangements.
Analytical methods combined thematic coding of interview transcripts with capability mapping and scenario-based supply chain stress testing to evaluate vulnerability points and adaptive strategies. Wherever possible, findings were corroborated by multiple independent sources to reduce bias and to ensure that recommendations are grounded in observable behavior rather than anecdote. Limitations are acknowledged where proprietary data or confidential contractual terms constrained full visibility, and recommended next steps include targeted vendor diligence and region-specific operational audits to refine applicability.
A strategic synthesis emphasizing the imperative to integrate technology, supply chain resilience, and workforce development to convert disruption into competitive advantage
In conclusion, the boat and ship MRO environment is at an inflection point where technological adoption, regulatory shifts, and trade policy developments intersect to create both risk and opportunity. Firms that proactively integrate predictive maintenance capabilities, reinforce supply chain continuity, and cultivate a digitally skilled workforce will be best positioned to preserve operational availability and to capture growing demand for advanced repair services. The strategic choices made now will determine whether organizations achieve sustainable cost reductions and superior fleet readiness or simply respond reactively to disruptions.
Decision-makers should therefore prioritize investments that deliver near-term resilience while building the foundations for longer-term transformation. By aligning procurement, training, and technology strategies, operators and service providers can convert disruption into competitive advantage and ensure that fleets remain safe, compliant, and mission-capable.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
191 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by Service Type
- 8.1. Inspection & Diagnostics
- 8.1.1. Condition Monitoring
- 8.1.2. Non-Destructive Testing
- 8.2. Maintenance
- 8.3. Overhaul & Refit
- 8.4. Repair
- 8.5. Upgrades & Retrofits
- 9. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by Maintenance Type
- 9.1. Dry Dock Maintenance
- 9.2. In-Situ Maintenance
- 10. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by Component
- 10.1. Auxiliary Machinery
- 10.1.1. Generators
- 10.1.2. Pumps & Compressors
- 10.2. Electrical & Power
- 10.2.1. Batteries & Storage
- 10.2.2. Switchboards & Distribution
- 10.3. Hull & Structure
- 10.4. Navigation & Communication
- 10.4.1. Radar/ECDIS/AIS
- 10.4.2. Radio & Satcom
- 10.5. Propulsion
- 11. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by Maintenance Strategy
- 11.1. Condition-Based
- 11.2. Corrective
- 11.3. Predictive
- 11.4. Preventive
- 12. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by Vessel Type
- 12.1. Commercial Vessel
- 12.1.1. Bulk Carrier
- 12.1.2. Container Ship
- 12.1.3. Tanker
- 12.2. Fishing & Aquaculture
- 12.3. Military Vessel
- 12.4. Passenger
- 12.5. Recreational & Leisure
- 13. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by Service Provider
- 13.1. In-House Fleet Teams
- 13.2. Independent MRO Providers
- 13.3. OEM Service Networks
- 13.4. Shipyards & Dry Docks
- 14. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by End User
- 14.1. Charterers
- 14.2. Fleet Owners/Operators
- 14.3. Navies & Coast Guards
- 14.4. Offshore Energy Operators
- 14.5. Private Owners
- 15. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by Region
- 15.1. Americas
- 15.1.1. North America
- 15.1.2. Latin America
- 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 15.2.1. Europe
- 15.2.2. Middle East
- 15.2.3. Africa
- 15.3. Asia-Pacific
- 16. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by Group
- 16.1. ASEAN
- 16.2. GCC
- 16.3. European Union
- 16.4. BRICS
- 16.5. G7
- 16.6. NATO
- 17. Boat & Ship MRO Market, by Country
- 17.1. United States
- 17.2. Canada
- 17.3. Mexico
- 17.4. Brazil
- 17.5. United Kingdom
- 17.6. Germany
- 17.7. France
- 17.8. Russia
- 17.9. Italy
- 17.10. Spain
- 17.11. China
- 17.12. India
- 17.13. Japan
- 17.14. Australia
- 17.15. South Korea
- 18. United States Boat & Ship MRO Market
- 19. China Boat & Ship MRO Market
- 20. Competitive Landscape
- 20.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 20.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 20.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 20.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 20.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 20.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 20.5. 3GA Marine Ltd.
- 20.6. ABB Ltd.
- 20.7. Abu Dhabi Ship Building Pjsc
- 20.8. Atlas Marine Shipping LLC
- 20.9. Austal Ltd.
- 20.10. Babcock International Group PLC
- 20.11. BAE Systems PLC
- 20.12. Bender CCP, Inc.
- 20.13. Bollinger Shipyards LLC
- 20.14. Chantier Naval de Marseille
- 20.15. Chantiers de l'Atlantique
- 20.16. China Shipbuilding Trading Co., Ltd.
- 20.17. COSCO Shipping Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.
- 20.18. Damen Shipyards Group
- 20.19. Dynatron Services Pvt. Ltd.
- 20.20. Everllence
- 20.21. Fincantieri S.p.A.
- 20.22. General Dynamics Corporation
- 20.23. Goltens
- 20.24. HD Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.
- 20.25. HPI, LLC
- 20.26. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
- 20.27. Hydrex NV
- 20.28. International Maritime Industries
- 20.29. Keppel Offshore & Marine
- 20.30. Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
- 20.31. Larsen & Toubro Limited
- 20.32. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 20.33. Lürssen Werft GmbH & Co. KG
- 20.34. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 20.35. Mitsui E&S Co., Ltd.
- 20.36. NAVANTIA, S.A.
- 20.37. Neptune Marine Services Private Limited
- 20.38. Rhoads Industries Inc.
- 20.39. Saab AB
- 20.40. Seaspan Group of Companies
- 20.41. Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
- 20.42. Subsea Global Solutions
- 20.43. Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 20.44. Wärtsilä Corporation
- 20.45. Zamakona Yards Canarias, S.L.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
