1,2-Bis ethane Market by Product Type (Liquid, Powder, Solid), Purity Level (Industrial Grade, Laboratory Grade, Technical Grade), Application, End Use Industry, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The 1,2-Bis ethane Market was valued at USD 2.47 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 2.58 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.53%, reaching USD 3.61 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction synthesizing the chemical profile, operational relevance, and strategic context for stakeholders engaged with 1,2-Bis ethane
1,2-Bis ethane occupies a distinctive position as a multifunctional intermediate and solvent analogue across multiple industrial processes. Its chemical attributes underpin roles in formulations ranging from adhesives and coatings to plasticizers and select lubricant additive chemistries, and these end uses drive its strategic relevance for manufacturers, formulators, and downstream converters. In parallel, production and distribution nodes for this class of compounds have become more tightly coupled to broader petrochemical and commodity chemical cycles, rendering supply dynamics sensitive to feedstock price swings, feedstock sourcing strategies, and logistics constraints.
Stakeholders should understand that the compound’s utility derives not only from intrinsic performance characteristics but also from compatibility with production equipment, regulatory acceptance in target geographies, and handling considerations tied to purity levels. As a result, decisions about sourcing, specification, and substitution are increasingly informed by cross-functional evaluation that spans R&D, procurement, regulatory affairs, and commercial operations. This introduction sets the stage for deeper analysis by framing the technical, operational, and strategic contexts that shape how organizations approach opportunities and risks associated with 1,2-Bis ethane.
Analysis of converging technological, regulatory, and supply chain forces that are redefining competitive advantage and product pathways in the 1,2-Bis ethane landscape
The landscape for 1,2-Bis ethane is being reshaped by a set of transformative shifts that are altering both supply behavior and demand composition. Accelerating decarbonization commitments and tighter environmental regulations are steering formulators toward lower-emissions feedstocks and solvents with favorable lifecycle footprints, prompting technical teams to prioritize processes and chemistries that lower overall carbon intensity. At the same time, advancements in catalysis and separation technologies are enabling more consistent control over purity grades, which in turn is expanding the feasible application space for higher-performance segments.
Concurrently, procurement strategies are evolving: buying organizations display greater emphasis on supplier resilience, traceability, and contingency planning, leading to longer-term partnerships and dual-sourcing approaches. Geopolitical tensions and trade policy volatility have incentivized regionalization, accelerating nearshoring of both upstream intermediates and downstream formulation activities. Digital tools, including advanced analytics and real-time logistics tracking, are improving visibility across complex supply chains and enabling faster reaction to disruptions. Collectively, these shifts are producing a landscape in which innovation, regulatory alignment, and supply chain agility determine competitive advantage more than simple cost metrics.
Evaluation of how United States tariff measures through 2025 reshaped sourcing decisions, landed-cost calculus, and trade compliance practices across the chemical value chain
The cumulative impact of United States tariffs implemented through 2025 has materially affected procurement strategies and industry behavior across the value chain for chemical intermediates including compounds like 1,2-Bis ethane. Tariff actions increased landed cost volatility for certain supply corridors, prompting buyers to reassess sourcing footprints and to accelerate qualification of alternate suppliers in tariff-exempt jurisdictions. As a result, many firms prioritized tariff risk mitigation by diversifying supplier lists and increasing regional inventory buffers to maintain production continuity despite customs friction.
Tariff-driven cost pressures also intensified supplier-customer negotiations around contractual terms, with more frequent requests for cost pass-through mechanisms, longer-term fixed-price agreements, and shared risk clauses. Logistics routing adjusted as firms evaluated the net landed cost after tariffs and duties, often shifting volumes to ports and overland routes with lower tariff exposure or more favorable trade arrangements. In addition, the tariff environment catalyzed innovation in trade compliance and customs optimization, as companies invested in classification accuracy, tariff engineering where compliant, and deeper trade policy analytics to reduce unnecessary duty exposure. These adaptive behaviors demonstrate that policy shifts have an enduring influence on sourcing, inventory strategy, and commercial contracting across the chemical supply chain.
Holistic segmentation analysis revealing application-driven technical thresholds, distribution models, product formats, and purity-level implications for commercialization
Insight into market segmentation for 1,2-Bis ethane highlights distinct performance and commercialization pathways tied to application, industry end use, distribution, product type, and purity specification. Based on Application, the market is studied across Adhesives, Coatings, Lubricant Additives, Plasticizers, and Solvents, and these application buckets each impose unique technical specifications, processing constraints, and regulatory requirements on procurers and formulators. Based on End Use Industry, the market is studied across Automotive, Construction, Electrical & Electronics, and Packaging, with Automotive further examined across Aftermarket and OEM and Packaging further differentiated between Flexible Packaging and Rigid Packaging; this framing demonstrates how end-industry procurement cycles, approval protocols, and volume fluctuations directly influence demand patterns for specific product variants.
Based on Distribution Channel, the market is studied across Direct Sales, Distributors, and Online, and within distribution the Distributors segment is further analyzed across Retail Distributors, Value-Added Distributors, and Wholesale Distributors, reflecting varying service levels, inventory strategies, and technical support expectations. Based on Product Type, the market is studied across Liquid, Powder, and Solid formats, revealing how handling considerations and formulation methods affect logistics and storage. Based on Purity Level, the market is studied across Industrial Grade, Laboratory Grade, and Technical Grade, highlighting how purity thresholds drive downstream acceptance in regulated industries and laboratory environments. Together, these segmentation lenses clarify where value accrues, where technical investments are required, and how commercial models must adapt to meet end-user expectations.
Regional dynamics and comparative operating conditions across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine supply, compliance, and go-to-market strategies
Regional dynamics markedly influence competitive positioning, risk exposure, and regulatory compliance for stakeholders dealing with 1,2-Bis ethane. In the Americas, supply chain flexibility and proximity to North American petrochemical hubs support rapid response to industrial demand, while regulatory regimes at federal and subnational levels create nuanced compliance landscapes that require active management. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment places a premium on environmental compliance and sustainability credentials, and geopolitical considerations across EMEA introduce complexity in cross-border logistics and trade arrangements. In Asia-Pacific, dense manufacturing ecosystems and feedstock integration offer scale advantages, but they also present logistical and quality-control challenges as supply chains lengthen and geographies diversify.
Across these regions, differences in energy costs, feedstock availability, and regulatory intensity influence decisions about where to site production, how to design supplier networks, and which innovation investments yield the greatest return. Additionally, regional customer expectations-whether emphasizing technical support, rapid delivery, or sustainability credentials-shape go-to-market approaches. Firms that align regional operating models with local regulatory and commercial realities, while preserving global consistency in quality and compliance systems, will be better positioned to capitalize on cross-regional demand shifts and to mitigate exposure to localized disruptions.
Competitive company behaviors showing technical service, multi-tier purity control, and distribution partnerships as the primary differentiators shaping supplier advantage
Key company insights point to a competitive environment in which capabilities beyond scale matter: technical support, regulatory expertise, and resilient logistics are increasingly differentiators. Leading suppliers demonstrate disciplined product stewardship, rigorous purity control across industrial, laboratory, and technical grades, and structured customer-engagement models that align distribution channels to end-user needs. Companies that have invested in downstream application support for adhesives, coatings, and lubricant additive formulators tend to see stronger retention among OEMs and aftermarket purchasers, where qualification cycles are lengthy and technical validation is critical.
Strategic partnerships between producers and value-added distributors are becoming more common, as distributors provide localized inventory, formulation services, and faster order fulfillment for segments such as flexible and rigid packaging customers. In addition, several manufacturers have prioritized investments in sustainability reporting, product lifecycle assessments, and certifications to meet the expectations of environmentally focused customers and regulators. Competitive advantage accrues to firms that combine reliable supply, adaptable product formats (liquid, powder, solid), and multiple purity tiers, while also offering compliance documentation and rapid technical troubleshooting to accelerate customer approval timelines.
Actionable strategic moves for suppliers to build resilience, differentiate technically, and accelerate adoption across regulated and high-performance end-use industries
Industry leaders should take decisive steps to strengthen resilience, capture product differentiation, and align with evolving regulatory expectations. First, invest in diversification of feedstock sources and dual-sourcing strategies to reduce vulnerability to trade policy and logistics disruptions, while establishing contractual frameworks that enable transparent cost-sharing and contingency activation. Second, differentiate offerings through enhanced technical service levels tied to application validation, especially for adhesives, coatings, and lubricant additive customers that require rigorous qualification. This includes pre-formulation support, co-development trials, and comprehensive documentation packages for various purity grades.
Third, prioritize sustainability credentials by conducting lifecycle assessments and improving traceability across the supply chain, as procurement teams increasingly require environmental evidence during supplier selection. Fourth, optimize distribution strategies by partnering with value-added distributors to improve last-mile responsiveness in critical end-use industries such as automotive and packaging, and by enhancing digital ordering and inventory visibility. Finally, bolster trade compliance capabilities and scenario planning to respond rapidly to tariff changes and customs uncertainties. These combined actions will fortify market position and enable faster capture of opportunities as end-users shift toward higher-performance and better-documented chemical inputs.
Transparent mixed-method research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, secondary regulatory and technical synthesis, and triangulation for robust validation
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines primary qualitative engagement with secondary synthesis to ensure relevance and rigour. Primary inputs include structured interviews with technical leads, procurement managers, and distribution partners to capture first-hand intelligence on specification requirements, approval cycle timelines, and logistical constraints. These engagements provide context for how product formats and purity tiers affect downstream acceptance in industries such as automotive, construction, electrical and electronics, and packaging.
Secondary work involved a systematic review of public regulatory texts, trade policy announcements, industry technical literature, and supply chain case studies to map the interaction between policy change and commercial responses. Triangulation techniques were applied to reconcile differing viewpoints and to identify consistent patterns across regions and distribution channels. Quality assurance included cross-validation of technical claims with independent subject-matter experts and verification of trade compliance trends through customs and tariff documentation. The methodology prioritizes transparency and reproducibility, with clearly documented assumptions, interview protocols, and source citations available in the full report appendix.
Concise conclusion synthesizing strategic implications of technical requirements, regulatory pressures, and supply chain evolution for decision-makers
In conclusion, the strategic landscape for 1,2-Bis ethane is defined by the interplay of technical specificity, regulatory pressure, and evolving supply chain design. Its relevance across adhesives, coatings, lubricant additives, plasticizers, and solvent applications ensures continuing demand from diverse industrial sectors, while shifts in trade policy and regional sourcing strategies are prompting more sophisticated procurement and supplier engagement practices. Firms that prioritize multi-tier purity control, invest in technical customer support, and align distribution strategies to regional customer expectations will be best equipped to manage disruption and to capture value as product requirements evolve.
The cumulative effects of regulatory and policy shifts underscore the importance of proactive compliance, advanced trade analytics, and sustainability proof points. Organizations that adopt integrated strategies-balancing resilience in sourcing, investment in application-level services, and a clear sustainability narrative-will achieve a durable competitive edge. This executive synthesis offers a foundation for decision-makers to refine their strategic priorities and to identify where additional, targeted intelligence is most beneficial.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction synthesizing the chemical profile, operational relevance, and strategic context for stakeholders engaged with 1,2-Bis ethane
1,2-Bis ethane occupies a distinctive position as a multifunctional intermediate and solvent analogue across multiple industrial processes. Its chemical attributes underpin roles in formulations ranging from adhesives and coatings to plasticizers and select lubricant additive chemistries, and these end uses drive its strategic relevance for manufacturers, formulators, and downstream converters. In parallel, production and distribution nodes for this class of compounds have become more tightly coupled to broader petrochemical and commodity chemical cycles, rendering supply dynamics sensitive to feedstock price swings, feedstock sourcing strategies, and logistics constraints.
Stakeholders should understand that the compound’s utility derives not only from intrinsic performance characteristics but also from compatibility with production equipment, regulatory acceptance in target geographies, and handling considerations tied to purity levels. As a result, decisions about sourcing, specification, and substitution are increasingly informed by cross-functional evaluation that spans R&D, procurement, regulatory affairs, and commercial operations. This introduction sets the stage for deeper analysis by framing the technical, operational, and strategic contexts that shape how organizations approach opportunities and risks associated with 1,2-Bis ethane.
Analysis of converging technological, regulatory, and supply chain forces that are redefining competitive advantage and product pathways in the 1,2-Bis ethane landscape
The landscape for 1,2-Bis ethane is being reshaped by a set of transformative shifts that are altering both supply behavior and demand composition. Accelerating decarbonization commitments and tighter environmental regulations are steering formulators toward lower-emissions feedstocks and solvents with favorable lifecycle footprints, prompting technical teams to prioritize processes and chemistries that lower overall carbon intensity. At the same time, advancements in catalysis and separation technologies are enabling more consistent control over purity grades, which in turn is expanding the feasible application space for higher-performance segments.
Concurrently, procurement strategies are evolving: buying organizations display greater emphasis on supplier resilience, traceability, and contingency planning, leading to longer-term partnerships and dual-sourcing approaches. Geopolitical tensions and trade policy volatility have incentivized regionalization, accelerating nearshoring of both upstream intermediates and downstream formulation activities. Digital tools, including advanced analytics and real-time logistics tracking, are improving visibility across complex supply chains and enabling faster reaction to disruptions. Collectively, these shifts are producing a landscape in which innovation, regulatory alignment, and supply chain agility determine competitive advantage more than simple cost metrics.
Evaluation of how United States tariff measures through 2025 reshaped sourcing decisions, landed-cost calculus, and trade compliance practices across the chemical value chain
The cumulative impact of United States tariffs implemented through 2025 has materially affected procurement strategies and industry behavior across the value chain for chemical intermediates including compounds like 1,2-Bis ethane. Tariff actions increased landed cost volatility for certain supply corridors, prompting buyers to reassess sourcing footprints and to accelerate qualification of alternate suppliers in tariff-exempt jurisdictions. As a result, many firms prioritized tariff risk mitigation by diversifying supplier lists and increasing regional inventory buffers to maintain production continuity despite customs friction.
Tariff-driven cost pressures also intensified supplier-customer negotiations around contractual terms, with more frequent requests for cost pass-through mechanisms, longer-term fixed-price agreements, and shared risk clauses. Logistics routing adjusted as firms evaluated the net landed cost after tariffs and duties, often shifting volumes to ports and overland routes with lower tariff exposure or more favorable trade arrangements. In addition, the tariff environment catalyzed innovation in trade compliance and customs optimization, as companies invested in classification accuracy, tariff engineering where compliant, and deeper trade policy analytics to reduce unnecessary duty exposure. These adaptive behaviors demonstrate that policy shifts have an enduring influence on sourcing, inventory strategy, and commercial contracting across the chemical supply chain.
Holistic segmentation analysis revealing application-driven technical thresholds, distribution models, product formats, and purity-level implications for commercialization
Insight into market segmentation for 1,2-Bis ethane highlights distinct performance and commercialization pathways tied to application, industry end use, distribution, product type, and purity specification. Based on Application, the market is studied across Adhesives, Coatings, Lubricant Additives, Plasticizers, and Solvents, and these application buckets each impose unique technical specifications, processing constraints, and regulatory requirements on procurers and formulators. Based on End Use Industry, the market is studied across Automotive, Construction, Electrical & Electronics, and Packaging, with Automotive further examined across Aftermarket and OEM and Packaging further differentiated between Flexible Packaging and Rigid Packaging; this framing demonstrates how end-industry procurement cycles, approval protocols, and volume fluctuations directly influence demand patterns for specific product variants.
Based on Distribution Channel, the market is studied across Direct Sales, Distributors, and Online, and within distribution the Distributors segment is further analyzed across Retail Distributors, Value-Added Distributors, and Wholesale Distributors, reflecting varying service levels, inventory strategies, and technical support expectations. Based on Product Type, the market is studied across Liquid, Powder, and Solid formats, revealing how handling considerations and formulation methods affect logistics and storage. Based on Purity Level, the market is studied across Industrial Grade, Laboratory Grade, and Technical Grade, highlighting how purity thresholds drive downstream acceptance in regulated industries and laboratory environments. Together, these segmentation lenses clarify where value accrues, where technical investments are required, and how commercial models must adapt to meet end-user expectations.
Regional dynamics and comparative operating conditions across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine supply, compliance, and go-to-market strategies
Regional dynamics markedly influence competitive positioning, risk exposure, and regulatory compliance for stakeholders dealing with 1,2-Bis ethane. In the Americas, supply chain flexibility and proximity to North American petrochemical hubs support rapid response to industrial demand, while regulatory regimes at federal and subnational levels create nuanced compliance landscapes that require active management. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment places a premium on environmental compliance and sustainability credentials, and geopolitical considerations across EMEA introduce complexity in cross-border logistics and trade arrangements. In Asia-Pacific, dense manufacturing ecosystems and feedstock integration offer scale advantages, but they also present logistical and quality-control challenges as supply chains lengthen and geographies diversify.
Across these regions, differences in energy costs, feedstock availability, and regulatory intensity influence decisions about where to site production, how to design supplier networks, and which innovation investments yield the greatest return. Additionally, regional customer expectations-whether emphasizing technical support, rapid delivery, or sustainability credentials-shape go-to-market approaches. Firms that align regional operating models with local regulatory and commercial realities, while preserving global consistency in quality and compliance systems, will be better positioned to capitalize on cross-regional demand shifts and to mitigate exposure to localized disruptions.
Competitive company behaviors showing technical service, multi-tier purity control, and distribution partnerships as the primary differentiators shaping supplier advantage
Key company insights point to a competitive environment in which capabilities beyond scale matter: technical support, regulatory expertise, and resilient logistics are increasingly differentiators. Leading suppliers demonstrate disciplined product stewardship, rigorous purity control across industrial, laboratory, and technical grades, and structured customer-engagement models that align distribution channels to end-user needs. Companies that have invested in downstream application support for adhesives, coatings, and lubricant additive formulators tend to see stronger retention among OEMs and aftermarket purchasers, where qualification cycles are lengthy and technical validation is critical.
Strategic partnerships between producers and value-added distributors are becoming more common, as distributors provide localized inventory, formulation services, and faster order fulfillment for segments such as flexible and rigid packaging customers. In addition, several manufacturers have prioritized investments in sustainability reporting, product lifecycle assessments, and certifications to meet the expectations of environmentally focused customers and regulators. Competitive advantage accrues to firms that combine reliable supply, adaptable product formats (liquid, powder, solid), and multiple purity tiers, while also offering compliance documentation and rapid technical troubleshooting to accelerate customer approval timelines.
Actionable strategic moves for suppliers to build resilience, differentiate technically, and accelerate adoption across regulated and high-performance end-use industries
Industry leaders should take decisive steps to strengthen resilience, capture product differentiation, and align with evolving regulatory expectations. First, invest in diversification of feedstock sources and dual-sourcing strategies to reduce vulnerability to trade policy and logistics disruptions, while establishing contractual frameworks that enable transparent cost-sharing and contingency activation. Second, differentiate offerings through enhanced technical service levels tied to application validation, especially for adhesives, coatings, and lubricant additive customers that require rigorous qualification. This includes pre-formulation support, co-development trials, and comprehensive documentation packages for various purity grades.
Third, prioritize sustainability credentials by conducting lifecycle assessments and improving traceability across the supply chain, as procurement teams increasingly require environmental evidence during supplier selection. Fourth, optimize distribution strategies by partnering with value-added distributors to improve last-mile responsiveness in critical end-use industries such as automotive and packaging, and by enhancing digital ordering and inventory visibility. Finally, bolster trade compliance capabilities and scenario planning to respond rapidly to tariff changes and customs uncertainties. These combined actions will fortify market position and enable faster capture of opportunities as end-users shift toward higher-performance and better-documented chemical inputs.
Transparent mixed-method research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, secondary regulatory and technical synthesis, and triangulation for robust validation
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines primary qualitative engagement with secondary synthesis to ensure relevance and rigour. Primary inputs include structured interviews with technical leads, procurement managers, and distribution partners to capture first-hand intelligence on specification requirements, approval cycle timelines, and logistical constraints. These engagements provide context for how product formats and purity tiers affect downstream acceptance in industries such as automotive, construction, electrical and electronics, and packaging.
Secondary work involved a systematic review of public regulatory texts, trade policy announcements, industry technical literature, and supply chain case studies to map the interaction between policy change and commercial responses. Triangulation techniques were applied to reconcile differing viewpoints and to identify consistent patterns across regions and distribution channels. Quality assurance included cross-validation of technical claims with independent subject-matter experts and verification of trade compliance trends through customs and tariff documentation. The methodology prioritizes transparency and reproducibility, with clearly documented assumptions, interview protocols, and source citations available in the full report appendix.
Concise conclusion synthesizing strategic implications of technical requirements, regulatory pressures, and supply chain evolution for decision-makers
In conclusion, the strategic landscape for 1,2-Bis ethane is defined by the interplay of technical specificity, regulatory pressure, and evolving supply chain design. Its relevance across adhesives, coatings, lubricant additives, plasticizers, and solvent applications ensures continuing demand from diverse industrial sectors, while shifts in trade policy and regional sourcing strategies are prompting more sophisticated procurement and supplier engagement practices. Firms that prioritize multi-tier purity control, invest in technical customer support, and align distribution strategies to regional customer expectations will be best equipped to manage disruption and to capture value as product requirements evolve.
The cumulative effects of regulatory and policy shifts underscore the importance of proactive compliance, advanced trade analytics, and sustainability proof points. Organizations that adopt integrated strategies-balancing resilience in sourcing, investment in application-level services, and a clear sustainability narrative-will achieve a durable competitive edge. This executive synthesis offers a foundation for decision-makers to refine their strategic priorities and to identify where additional, targeted intelligence is most beneficial.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
182 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. 1,2-Bis ethane Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Liquid
- 8.2. Powder
- 8.3. Solid
- 9. 1,2-Bis ethane Market, by Purity Level
- 9.1. Industrial Grade
- 9.2. Laboratory Grade
- 9.3. Technical Grade
- 10. 1,2-Bis ethane Market, by Application
- 10.1. Adhesives
- 10.2. Coatings
- 10.3. Lubricant Additives
- 10.4. Plasticizers
- 10.5. Solvents
- 11. 1,2-Bis ethane Market, by End Use Industry
- 11.1. Automotive
- 11.1.1. Aftermarket
- 11.1.2. Oem
- 11.2. Construction
- 11.3. Electrical & Electronics
- 11.4. Packaging
- 11.4.1. Flexible Packaging
- 11.4.2. Rigid Packaging
- 12. 1,2-Bis ethane Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Online
- 12.2. Offline
- 13. 1,2-Bis ethane Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. 1,2-Bis ethane Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. 1,2-Bis ethane Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. United States 1,2-Bis ethane Market
- 17. China 1,2-Bis ethane Market
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 18.5. Borealis AG
- 18.6. Braskem S.A.
- 18.7. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC
- 18.8. China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC)
- 18.9. Dow Inc.
- 18.10. ExxonMobil Chemical Company
- 18.11. Formosa Plastics Corporation
- 18.12. Hanwha Solutions Corporation
- 18.13. Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.
- 18.14. INEOS Group Holdings S.A.
- 18.15. LG Chem Ltd.
- 18.16. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
- 18.17. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
- 18.18. Novatek PJSC
- 18.19. PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited
- 18.20. Qatar Chemical Company Ltd. (Q‑Chem)
- 18.21. Reliance Industries Limited
- 18.22. SABIC
- 18.23. Sasol Limited
- 18.24. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited
- 18.25. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 18.26. Tasnee Petrochemicals
- 18.27. TotalEnergies SE
- 18.28. Westlake Chemical Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
