Biorefinery Market by Feedstock Type (Algae, Lignocellulosic Biomass, Sugar & Starch Crops), Process (Biochemical, Physicochemical Conversion, Thermochemical), Generation, Products, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Biorefinery Market was valued at USD 161.79 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 175.11 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.65%, reaching USD 314.40 billion by 2032.
An incisive introduction to how converging policy, technology, and supply chain forces are shaping integrated biorefinery systems and long‑term strategic priorities
Biorefinery systems are redefining how societies convert biological resources into energy, materials, and specialty chemicals, driven by converging environmental, economic, and technological forces. Stakeholders across value chains are responding to mandates for decarbonization, corporate sustainability commitments, and consumer preferences for bio-based solutions, which together create a persistent premium on low-carbon feedstocks and circular production models. At the same time, advances in biotechnology, catalysis, and process intensification are reducing technical barriers, enabling a wider array of feedstocks to be processed with higher yields and lower environmental footprints.
Transitioning from legacy petrochemical-centric paradigms to integrated biorefinery platforms requires coordinated progress on policy, finance, technology, and skills. Public incentives and regulatory clarity create a predictable horizon for capital deployment, while private sector collaboration and off-take agreements underwrite scale-up risk. As a result, the sector is evolving from isolated demonstration projects to connected networks of regional facilities that optimize local feedstock streams and energy integration. This introductory framing highlights why strategic leaders must adopt systems thinking and prioritize resilient supply chains, adaptive processing technology, and stakeholder alignment to capitalize on the emerging value pools.
A clear synthesis of the structural, regulatory, and technological transformations redefining competitive positioning and capital allocation across the biorefinery sector
The landscape of the biorefinery sector is undergoing transformative shifts that redefine competitive advantage and investment rationale. Regulatory frameworks oriented toward greenhouse gas reduction and circularity have increased the relative value of bio-based outputs, while expanding carbon accounting practices are changing procurement criteria across transportation, packaging, and specialty chemical markets. Concurrently, feedstock diversification is emerging as a strategic necessity: the ability to process algae, lignocellulosic residues, and conventional sugar and starch crops in a flexible manner mitigates volatility and supports resilience in feedstock supply.
Technological maturation in both biochemical and thermochemical pathways is accelerating deployment at scale. Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation platforms are benefiting from improved enzymes and microbial strains, whereas gasification and pyrolysis routes are seeing gains through advanced syngas cleanup and catalytic upgrading. Digitalization is further transforming plant operations through predictive maintenance, process optimization, and integrated logistics planning. Taken together, these shifts demand new commercial models and cross-sector partnerships that can mobilize capital, manage regulatory complexity, and match product portfolios to evolving end-user demands.
A thorough analysis of how 2025 trade measures have reshaped procurement dynamics, technology transfer, and project viability across the biorefinery value chain
The imposition of trade measures and tariff adjustments in 2025 has produced a layer of commercial complexity that ripples across procurement strategies, technology sourcing, and regional competitiveness. Tariffs influencing feedstock import costs and equipment procurement can raise the landed price of critical inputs for facilities that rely on cross-border supply chains, prompting firms to reassess sourcing footprints and consider greater onshoring or nearshoring of materials and components. Consequently, companies with vertically integrated supply chains or established domestic feedstock relationships have gained resilience, while those dependent on long-distance imports face near-term margin pressure.
Beyond direct cost impacts, tariffs affect the cadence of technology transfer and collaborative R&D. Higher duties on specific hardware or catalyst components can slow the diffusion of advanced processing units, encouraging investment in domestic manufacturing capacity or joint ventures with local suppliers. Financial stakeholders are consequently repricing project risk, placing a premium on demonstrable local content and supply chain transparency. In response, pragmatic mitigation approaches have included diversifying feedstock baskets, increasing modularization to simplify cross-border logistics, and renegotiating offtake contracts to include price indexation and shared risk mechanisms. These adaptive strategies help preserve project viability while navigating evolving trade policy dynamics.
Integrated segmentation insights that map feedstock pathways, conversion technologies, product portfolios, and end-use applications to strategic investment priorities and risk profiles
Segment-level understanding is essential to evaluate where value creation will concentrate as the industry scales. Based on Feedstock Type the industry spans algae, lignocellulosic biomass, and sugar and starch crops, each presenting different collection logistics, conversion efficiencies, and coproduct opportunities. Algae offers high productivity per unit area and desirable biochemical profiles for specialty compounds, whereas lignocellulosic residues unlock low-cost carbon streams from agricultural and forestry operations and demand robust pretreatment strategies. Sugar and starch crops retain an important role where infrastructure and agronomic systems are well established, but they require careful management to avoid land‑use tradeoffs.
Based on Process the competitive landscape differentiates across biochemical, physicochemical conversion, and thermochemical routes; the biochemical route further splits into enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, while thermochemical processes bifurcate into gasification and pyrolysis, each pathway yielding distinct product slates and capital intensity profiles. Based on Generation technologies progress through Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III maturity bands, which influences risk appetite and financing structures. Based on Products the output set includes biochemicals, biofuels, and biomaterials; biofuels are further categorized into biodiesel, bioethanol, and biogas, and biomaterials encompass biocomposites and fibers that serve higher‑value, differentiated applications. Based on Application demand spans energy generation, food and feed, household and personal care, industrial applications, pharmaceuticals, and transportation, each requiring tailored quality specifications and regulatory compliance. Integrating these segmentation lenses reveals where technological improvements, policy support, and supply chain innovation will most strongly affect competitive outcomes.
A nuanced regional assessment highlighting comparative strengths, policy drivers, and execution pathways across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics define execution feasibility and strategic emphasis for biorefinery programs. In the Americas, strong agricultural supply chains, established biofuel infrastructures, and active corporate sustainability programs create fertile ground for both incremental scaling and novel feedstock trials, while the depth of venture and project finance markets supports a range of demonstration to commercialization pathways. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a mosaic of policy intensities and resource endowments: Europe is characterized by stringent environmental standards and ambitious circularity mandates that favor advanced biochemical and biomaterial applications, whereas parts of the Middle East and Africa are prioritizing value addition to agricultural residues and integrating bio-based production with broader energy transitions.
Asia-Pacific presents rapid adoption potential driven by high energy demand growth, dense industrial clusters, and active government programs targeting circular economy outcomes; the region also offers abundant feedstock diversity from agriculture and aquaculture, enabling both large-scale biofuel projects and specialized biochemical production. Across all regions, cross-border cooperation on standards, harmonized sustainability criteria, and logistics optimization will accelerate project bankability. Moreover, regional comparative advantages in feedstock availability, technical talent, and policy incentives should guide where companies prioritize piloting versus scaling strategies.
Strategic corporate behaviors and partnership models that drive technology adoption, feedstock security, and commercialization pathways for biorefinery leaders and new entrants
Leading companies are adapting their commercial playbooks to capture emerging value pools across the biorefinery ecosystem. Where incumbents pursue vertical integration, they focus on securing feedstock access, locking in offtake agreements, and investing in modular processing units that can be deployed close to resource hubs. New entrants and technology developers concentrate on de‑risking unit operations through multi‑partner pilots, leveraging partnerships with established players for scale and access to distribution channels. Across both cohorts, emphasis on intellectual property around biocatalysts, pretreatment chemistries, and process control software has become a differentiator, attracting strategic investors seeking defensible technical moats.
Corporate strategies increasingly blend project-level execution with ecosystem building: firms form consortia with feedstock suppliers, utilities, and logistics providers to align incentives and share up‑front capital burdens. Strategic alliances with end-users in transportation, consumer goods, and specialty chemicals secure demand pull for new products, enabling investment in capacity expansion. In parallel, corporate venturing and targeted acquisitions accelerate capabilities in niche conversion technologies and biomaterials formulation. Taken together, these approaches reveal a pragmatic mix of build, buy, and partner tactics that navigate technical uncertainty while preserving optionality for diverse product outcomes.
A prioritized set of pragmatic, high‑impact actions for executives to improve feedstock resilience, accelerate scalable deployment, and secure long‑term commercial viability
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions to convert strategic intent into operational results. First, diversify feedstock portfolios to include algae, lignocellulosic residues, and conventional crops where feasible, thereby reducing exposure to single‑source shocks and preserving flexibility to shift between higher‑value products. Second, invest in modular, scalable process architectures that allow incremental capacity expansion and reduce time to revenue, while pairing these investments with digital optimization tools to improve yield and uptime. Third, engage proactively with policy makers to help shape predictable incentive structures and sustainability standards that support long‑term project bankability.
In parallel, cultivate integrated partnerships that link supply chain actors, technology providers, and end-users through pre-competitive data sharing and shared risk mechanisms. Prioritize workforce development programs to build operator and R&D capabilities, and adopt circular design principles to maximize coproduct valorization and waste minimization. Finally, align financing strategies with technology readiness by blending grant funding, strategic equity, and project finance to match risk with appropriate capital instruments. These combined actions reduce execution risk, accelerate commercialization, and improve the probability of sustained value capture.
A transparent, multi-method research framework combining stakeholder engagement, technical evaluation, and scenario-based sensitivity analysis to validate conclusions and recommendations
The research approach blends primary engagement with stakeholders, rigorous technical assessment, and multi-method validation to ensure robust findings and actionable recommendations. Primary research included structured interviews with senior executives, process engineers, policy experts, and supply chain operators to capture real-world constraints and emerging best practices. Complementing these conversations, technology-level evaluations drew on peer-reviewed literature, patent analysis, and demonstration project reports to assess performance trends across enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, gasification, and pyrolysis routes.
Quantitative methods included scenario-driven sensitivity analyses and comparative techno-economic assessments that explore how feedstock variability, capital intensity, and policy instruments influence project outcomes. Data triangulation and cross-validation with independent expert panels ensured that assumptions were defensible and that conclusions reflected a synthesis of practical experience and technical evidence. The methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions, a clear chain of evidence for key judgments, and iterative validation steps with domain experts to refine findings and reduce uncertainty.
A concise conclusion highlighting the decisive actions and collaborative frameworks required to translate biorefinery innovation into durable commercial and environmental outcomes
The cumulative evidence underscores a decisive inflection in the biorefinery sector toward integrated, resilient, and application-focused systems. Advances in conversion technologies and process integration, combined with evolving regulatory and procurement preferences, are expanding the commercial horizon for bio-based fuels, chemicals, and materials. Nevertheless, realizing this potential requires deliberate orchestration of supply chains, policy engagement, and blended financing to bridge the valley between demonstration and consistent commercial performance.
Going forward, organizations that align technological choices with realistic feedstock strategies, secure demand through offtake and partnership structures, and adopt modular approaches to scaling will be best positioned to capture value. Collaboration across industry, government, and financial institutions will accelerate deployment, reduce technology risk, and create the systemic conditions necessary for durable growth. The conclusion reiterates that targeted, coordinated action today unlocks the broader societal and economic benefits of a sustainable biorefinery transition.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An incisive introduction to how converging policy, technology, and supply chain forces are shaping integrated biorefinery systems and long‑term strategic priorities
Biorefinery systems are redefining how societies convert biological resources into energy, materials, and specialty chemicals, driven by converging environmental, economic, and technological forces. Stakeholders across value chains are responding to mandates for decarbonization, corporate sustainability commitments, and consumer preferences for bio-based solutions, which together create a persistent premium on low-carbon feedstocks and circular production models. At the same time, advances in biotechnology, catalysis, and process intensification are reducing technical barriers, enabling a wider array of feedstocks to be processed with higher yields and lower environmental footprints.
Transitioning from legacy petrochemical-centric paradigms to integrated biorefinery platforms requires coordinated progress on policy, finance, technology, and skills. Public incentives and regulatory clarity create a predictable horizon for capital deployment, while private sector collaboration and off-take agreements underwrite scale-up risk. As a result, the sector is evolving from isolated demonstration projects to connected networks of regional facilities that optimize local feedstock streams and energy integration. This introductory framing highlights why strategic leaders must adopt systems thinking and prioritize resilient supply chains, adaptive processing technology, and stakeholder alignment to capitalize on the emerging value pools.
A clear synthesis of the structural, regulatory, and technological transformations redefining competitive positioning and capital allocation across the biorefinery sector
The landscape of the biorefinery sector is undergoing transformative shifts that redefine competitive advantage and investment rationale. Regulatory frameworks oriented toward greenhouse gas reduction and circularity have increased the relative value of bio-based outputs, while expanding carbon accounting practices are changing procurement criteria across transportation, packaging, and specialty chemical markets. Concurrently, feedstock diversification is emerging as a strategic necessity: the ability to process algae, lignocellulosic residues, and conventional sugar and starch crops in a flexible manner mitigates volatility and supports resilience in feedstock supply.
Technological maturation in both biochemical and thermochemical pathways is accelerating deployment at scale. Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation platforms are benefiting from improved enzymes and microbial strains, whereas gasification and pyrolysis routes are seeing gains through advanced syngas cleanup and catalytic upgrading. Digitalization is further transforming plant operations through predictive maintenance, process optimization, and integrated logistics planning. Taken together, these shifts demand new commercial models and cross-sector partnerships that can mobilize capital, manage regulatory complexity, and match product portfolios to evolving end-user demands.
A thorough analysis of how 2025 trade measures have reshaped procurement dynamics, technology transfer, and project viability across the biorefinery value chain
The imposition of trade measures and tariff adjustments in 2025 has produced a layer of commercial complexity that ripples across procurement strategies, technology sourcing, and regional competitiveness. Tariffs influencing feedstock import costs and equipment procurement can raise the landed price of critical inputs for facilities that rely on cross-border supply chains, prompting firms to reassess sourcing footprints and consider greater onshoring or nearshoring of materials and components. Consequently, companies with vertically integrated supply chains or established domestic feedstock relationships have gained resilience, while those dependent on long-distance imports face near-term margin pressure.
Beyond direct cost impacts, tariffs affect the cadence of technology transfer and collaborative R&D. Higher duties on specific hardware or catalyst components can slow the diffusion of advanced processing units, encouraging investment in domestic manufacturing capacity or joint ventures with local suppliers. Financial stakeholders are consequently repricing project risk, placing a premium on demonstrable local content and supply chain transparency. In response, pragmatic mitigation approaches have included diversifying feedstock baskets, increasing modularization to simplify cross-border logistics, and renegotiating offtake contracts to include price indexation and shared risk mechanisms. These adaptive strategies help preserve project viability while navigating evolving trade policy dynamics.
Integrated segmentation insights that map feedstock pathways, conversion technologies, product portfolios, and end-use applications to strategic investment priorities and risk profiles
Segment-level understanding is essential to evaluate where value creation will concentrate as the industry scales. Based on Feedstock Type the industry spans algae, lignocellulosic biomass, and sugar and starch crops, each presenting different collection logistics, conversion efficiencies, and coproduct opportunities. Algae offers high productivity per unit area and desirable biochemical profiles for specialty compounds, whereas lignocellulosic residues unlock low-cost carbon streams from agricultural and forestry operations and demand robust pretreatment strategies. Sugar and starch crops retain an important role where infrastructure and agronomic systems are well established, but they require careful management to avoid land‑use tradeoffs.
Based on Process the competitive landscape differentiates across biochemical, physicochemical conversion, and thermochemical routes; the biochemical route further splits into enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, while thermochemical processes bifurcate into gasification and pyrolysis, each pathway yielding distinct product slates and capital intensity profiles. Based on Generation technologies progress through Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III maturity bands, which influences risk appetite and financing structures. Based on Products the output set includes biochemicals, biofuels, and biomaterials; biofuels are further categorized into biodiesel, bioethanol, and biogas, and biomaterials encompass biocomposites and fibers that serve higher‑value, differentiated applications. Based on Application demand spans energy generation, food and feed, household and personal care, industrial applications, pharmaceuticals, and transportation, each requiring tailored quality specifications and regulatory compliance. Integrating these segmentation lenses reveals where technological improvements, policy support, and supply chain innovation will most strongly affect competitive outcomes.
A nuanced regional assessment highlighting comparative strengths, policy drivers, and execution pathways across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics define execution feasibility and strategic emphasis for biorefinery programs. In the Americas, strong agricultural supply chains, established biofuel infrastructures, and active corporate sustainability programs create fertile ground for both incremental scaling and novel feedstock trials, while the depth of venture and project finance markets supports a range of demonstration to commercialization pathways. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a mosaic of policy intensities and resource endowments: Europe is characterized by stringent environmental standards and ambitious circularity mandates that favor advanced biochemical and biomaterial applications, whereas parts of the Middle East and Africa are prioritizing value addition to agricultural residues and integrating bio-based production with broader energy transitions.
Asia-Pacific presents rapid adoption potential driven by high energy demand growth, dense industrial clusters, and active government programs targeting circular economy outcomes; the region also offers abundant feedstock diversity from agriculture and aquaculture, enabling both large-scale biofuel projects and specialized biochemical production. Across all regions, cross-border cooperation on standards, harmonized sustainability criteria, and logistics optimization will accelerate project bankability. Moreover, regional comparative advantages in feedstock availability, technical talent, and policy incentives should guide where companies prioritize piloting versus scaling strategies.
Strategic corporate behaviors and partnership models that drive technology adoption, feedstock security, and commercialization pathways for biorefinery leaders and new entrants
Leading companies are adapting their commercial playbooks to capture emerging value pools across the biorefinery ecosystem. Where incumbents pursue vertical integration, they focus on securing feedstock access, locking in offtake agreements, and investing in modular processing units that can be deployed close to resource hubs. New entrants and technology developers concentrate on de‑risking unit operations through multi‑partner pilots, leveraging partnerships with established players for scale and access to distribution channels. Across both cohorts, emphasis on intellectual property around biocatalysts, pretreatment chemistries, and process control software has become a differentiator, attracting strategic investors seeking defensible technical moats.
Corporate strategies increasingly blend project-level execution with ecosystem building: firms form consortia with feedstock suppliers, utilities, and logistics providers to align incentives and share up‑front capital burdens. Strategic alliances with end-users in transportation, consumer goods, and specialty chemicals secure demand pull for new products, enabling investment in capacity expansion. In parallel, corporate venturing and targeted acquisitions accelerate capabilities in niche conversion technologies and biomaterials formulation. Taken together, these approaches reveal a pragmatic mix of build, buy, and partner tactics that navigate technical uncertainty while preserving optionality for diverse product outcomes.
A prioritized set of pragmatic, high‑impact actions for executives to improve feedstock resilience, accelerate scalable deployment, and secure long‑term commercial viability
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions to convert strategic intent into operational results. First, diversify feedstock portfolios to include algae, lignocellulosic residues, and conventional crops where feasible, thereby reducing exposure to single‑source shocks and preserving flexibility to shift between higher‑value products. Second, invest in modular, scalable process architectures that allow incremental capacity expansion and reduce time to revenue, while pairing these investments with digital optimization tools to improve yield and uptime. Third, engage proactively with policy makers to help shape predictable incentive structures and sustainability standards that support long‑term project bankability.
In parallel, cultivate integrated partnerships that link supply chain actors, technology providers, and end-users through pre-competitive data sharing and shared risk mechanisms. Prioritize workforce development programs to build operator and R&D capabilities, and adopt circular design principles to maximize coproduct valorization and waste minimization. Finally, align financing strategies with technology readiness by blending grant funding, strategic equity, and project finance to match risk with appropriate capital instruments. These combined actions reduce execution risk, accelerate commercialization, and improve the probability of sustained value capture.
A transparent, multi-method research framework combining stakeholder engagement, technical evaluation, and scenario-based sensitivity analysis to validate conclusions and recommendations
The research approach blends primary engagement with stakeholders, rigorous technical assessment, and multi-method validation to ensure robust findings and actionable recommendations. Primary research included structured interviews with senior executives, process engineers, policy experts, and supply chain operators to capture real-world constraints and emerging best practices. Complementing these conversations, technology-level evaluations drew on peer-reviewed literature, patent analysis, and demonstration project reports to assess performance trends across enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, gasification, and pyrolysis routes.
Quantitative methods included scenario-driven sensitivity analyses and comparative techno-economic assessments that explore how feedstock variability, capital intensity, and policy instruments influence project outcomes. Data triangulation and cross-validation with independent expert panels ensured that assumptions were defensible and that conclusions reflected a synthesis of practical experience and technical evidence. The methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions, a clear chain of evidence for key judgments, and iterative validation steps with domain experts to refine findings and reduce uncertainty.
A concise conclusion highlighting the decisive actions and collaborative frameworks required to translate biorefinery innovation into durable commercial and environmental outcomes
The cumulative evidence underscores a decisive inflection in the biorefinery sector toward integrated, resilient, and application-focused systems. Advances in conversion technologies and process integration, combined with evolving regulatory and procurement preferences, are expanding the commercial horizon for bio-based fuels, chemicals, and materials. Nevertheless, realizing this potential requires deliberate orchestration of supply chains, policy engagement, and blended financing to bridge the valley between demonstration and consistent commercial performance.
Going forward, organizations that align technological choices with realistic feedstock strategies, secure demand through offtake and partnership structures, and adopt modular approaches to scaling will be best positioned to capture value. Collaboration across industry, government, and financial institutions will accelerate deployment, reduce technology risk, and create the systemic conditions necessary for durable growth. The conclusion reiterates that targeted, coordinated action today unlocks the broader societal and economic benefits of a sustainable biorefinery transition.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
183 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Expansion of integrated biochemical and thermochemical pathways for high-value bioproducts from agricultural residues
- 5.2. Adoption of precision fermentation techniques to enhance specialty chemical production from renewable substrates
- 5.3. Development of novel solid-state fermentation reactors for decentralized lignocellulosic biomass valorization
- 5.4. Implementation of continuous process intensification strategies to reduce energy consumption in biorefinery operations
- 5.5. Scale-up challenges in catalytic upgrading of bio-oils derived from fast pyrolysis of biomass feedstocks
- 5.6. Strategic partnerships between bioethanol producers and petrochemical firms for co-processing in existing refineries
- 5.7. Market entry of drop-in biofuels produced through hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids technology in aviation
- 5.8. Advancements in microbial consortia engineering for consolidated bioprocessing of mixed waste streams toward bio-based polymers
- 5.9. Policy-driven investments targeting carbon capture integration within large-scale biorefineries to achieve net-zero emissions
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Biorefinery Market, by Feedstock Type
- 8.1. Algae
- 8.2. Lignocellulosic Biomass
- 8.3. Sugar & Starch Crops
- 9. Biorefinery Market, by Process
- 9.1. Biochemical
- 9.1.1. Enzymatic Hydrolysis
- 9.1.2. Fermentation
- 9.2. Physicochemical Conversion
- 9.3. Thermochemical
- 9.3.1. Gasification
- 9.3.2. Pyrolysis
- 10. Biorefinery Market, by Generation
- 10.1. Phase I
- 10.2. Phase II
- 10.3. Phase III
- 11. Biorefinery Market, by Products
- 11.1. Biochemicals
- 11.2. Biofuels
- 11.2.1. Biodiesel
- 11.2.2. Bioethanol
- 11.2.3. Biogas
- 11.3. Biomaterials
- 11.3.1. Biocomposites
- 11.3.2. Fibers
- 12. Biorefinery Market, by Application
- 12.1. Energy Generation
- 12.2. Food & Feed
- 12.3. Household & Personal Care
- 12.4. Industrial Applications
- 12.5. Pharmaceuticals
- 12.6. Transportation
- 13. Biorefinery Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Biorefinery Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Biorefinery Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Archer Daniels Midland Company
- 16.3.2. Bangchak Corporation Public Company Limited
- 16.3.3. Borregaard AS
- 16.3.4. BP PLC
- 16.3.5. Cargill Incorporated
- 16.3.6. Chempolis Ltd.
- 16.3.7. China Petrochemical Corporation
- 16.3.8. Clariant AG
- 16.3.9. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 16.3.10. Eni S.p.A.
- 16.3.11. Godavari Biorefineries Ltd.
- 16.3.12. Green Plains Inc.
- 16.3.13. Honeywell International Inc.
- 16.3.14. IES Biogas by Snam SPA
- 16.3.15. LENZING AG
- 16.3.16. Neste Oyj
- 16.3.17. POET, LLC
- 16.3.18. Renewable Energy Group by Chevron Corporation
- 16.3.19. SEKAB Biofuels and Chemicals AB
- 16.3.20. TotalEnergies SE
- 16.3.21. UPM-Kymmene Corporation
- 16.3.22. Valero Marketing and Supply Company
- 16.3.23. Wilmar International Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
