Biodegradable Plastic Packaging Market by Form (Coating & Laminate, Film & Bag, Rigid Container), Application (Agriculture, Beverage Packaging, Consumer Goods Packaging), Product Type, Sales Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Biodegradable Plastic Packaging Market was valued at USD 3.45 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 3.74 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.77%, reaching USD 6.78 billion by 2032.
A comprehensive orientation to the forces shaping biodegradable plastic packaging and how stakeholders are aligning strategy with material and regulatory realities
Biodegradable plastic packaging has transitioned from niche experimentation to a mainstream priority for manufacturers, brand owners, regulators, and consumers seeking reduced environmental impact. This introduction outlines the converging forces shaping the sector: heightened regulatory scrutiny on single-use plastics, evolving consumer preferences toward transparent sustainability claims, advances in polymer science that expand performance parity with conventional plastics, and the maturation of end-of-life infrastructure including industrial composting and anaerobic digestion. Taken together, these dynamics are influencing material selection, product design, and value chain partnerships across multiple packaging formats.
Transitioning from awareness to application requires pragmatic alignment between environmental objectives and commercial realities. Industry leaders must weigh material properties such as barrier performance, mechanical strength, and processability against operational constraints including production throughput and recycling stream contamination risks. Meanwhile, procurement and innovation teams are increasingly focused on traceability, certification and the ability to demonstrate cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-grave pathways. As a result, strategies that combine material innovation with supply chain coordination and transparent communication are gaining traction as effective levers for scalable adoption.
How recent advances in polymer science, regulatory clarity, and consumer transparency are fundamentally reconfiguring production, procurement, and innovation strategies
The landscape of biodegradable plastic packaging is experiencing transformative shifts driven by technology, policy, and evolving consumer expectations. Advances in polymer chemistry and processing have produced higher-performance alternatives that close the gap with traditional plastics in barrier properties, clarity, and thermo-mechanical stability. In parallel, design-for-composting and design-for-recycling principles are being codified into product development roadmaps, forcing cross-functional collaboration between R&D, design, and operations teams.
Policy change is another accelerator of transformation, with regulators instituting clearer definitions for compostability and biodegradability, tightening labeling requirements, and incentivizing infrastructure investments for organics processing. These measures create both compliance obligations and market opportunities for manufacturers that can align product attributes with documented end-of-life pathways. Concurrently, brand owners are responding to more sophisticated consumer expectations for transparency by adopting digital traceability tools and third-party certification to validate sustainability claims. Taken together, these technological and institutional shifts are reconfiguring procurement criteria, enhancing supply chain scrutiny, and elevating sustainability from a marketing differentiator to a core operational imperative.
Understanding how the 2025 United States tariff adjustments reoriented sourcing, cost structures, and supplier relationships across biodegradable plastic packaging supply chains
The cumulative effects of U.S. tariff policy changes enacted in 2025 introduced a new layer of complexity across import-dependent segments of the biodegradable plastic packaging ecosystem. Tariff adjustments influenced cost structures for feedstocks, intermediates such as biopolymer resins, and finished packaging imported from key manufacturing hubs. As a consequence, manufacturers and brand owners recalibrated supplier sourcing strategies to mitigate exposure to tariff-driven price volatility while also assessing total landed costs that incorporate logistics, duties, and compliance overhead.
In response, several procurement teams adopted a dual approach: near-term tactical adjustments to supply chains to preserve continuity, and mid-term strategic repositioning that prioritizes supplier diversity and regional manufacturing partnerships. The tariff changes also prompted more robust contractual provisions around force majeure, cost escalation clauses, and longer-term supplier performance guarantees. On the demand side, some downstream value chain actors accelerated local sourcing and private-label production to maintain margin resilience. Importantly, the tariff environment catalyzed conversations with policymakers about harmonized standards that could reduce non-tariff barriers and support interoperable certification for biodegradable materials. Collectively, these responses illustrate how trade policy can rapidly reorient commercial and strategic priorities without undermining the sector’s long-term sustainability trajectory.
A nuanced segmentation-driven perspective revealing how form, application, polymer type, and channel dynamics determine prioritized investments and adoption pathways
Segment analysis reveals differentiated dynamics across form, application, product type, and sales channels that shape adoption pathways and investment priorities. Within form, coating and laminate formats-segmented into solvent based and water based subtypes-are often prioritized for high-barrier applications that require tailored surface treatments and adhesive strategies, while film and bag formats-distinguished between bag and film-are central to flexible packaging strategies that emphasize lightweighting and reduced material use. Rigid containers, subdivided into blow molded and injection molded types, remain critical for applications demanding mechanical strength and reclosure performance, and they drive investment in processing equipment and material stabilization technologies.
Across application segments, agriculture, beverage packaging, consumer goods packaging, food packaging, and medical and pharmaceutical packaging each impose unique performance, regulatory, and traceability requirements. Product type differentiation-spanning cellulose acetate, polybutylene adipate terephthalate, polybutylene succinate, polyhydroxyalkanoates, polylactic acid, and starch blend formulations-creates a matrix of trade-offs between biodegradability, processability, cost, and functional properties. Finally, sales channel dynamics subdivide into direct sales, online retail, specialty store, and supermarket and hypermarket pathways, with each channel exerting distinct influences on packaging format preferences, required certifications, and end-consumer expectations. Integrated consideration of these segmentation dimensions clarifies where technical innovation, commercial partnerships, and certification efforts will have the largest payoff for scale and market acceptance.
Regional contrasts in policy, infrastructure, and manufacturing capacity that dictate differentiated commercial strategies across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional perspectives reveal heterogeneous maturity, regulatory approaches, and infrastructure readiness across the global marketplace. In the Americas, regulatory focus and private sector initiatives converge around reducing single-use waste and expanding composting infrastructure, which fosters market opportunities for materials compatible with industrial and municipal organic processing. The Americas also exhibit strong collaboration between brand owners and waste management providers to pilot circular systems that link packaging design with collect-and-process capabilities.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, policy frameworks and extended producer responsibility mechanisms create a more prescriptive environment that necessitates compliance-oriented product development and detailed documentation of end-of-life performance. Within this region, certification regimes and standardized labeling have become influential in shaping cross-border trade and consumer trust. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid industrialization and large-scale manufacturing capacity coexist with significant investment in material innovation and logistics optimization. While infrastructure gaps remain in certain markets, the Asia-Pacific region is notable for its role in scaling production and process innovation that can improve cost competitiveness and availability of biodegradable alternatives. Each region’s distinct policy priorities, infrastructure development trajectories, and market channels inform tailored commercialization strategies.
How leadership in materials science, processing scale, and collaborative partnerships determines competitive advantage and accelerates market acceptance
Competitive dynamics in the biodegradable plastic packaging sector are characterized by differentiated capabilities across materials expertise, processing technologies, certification track records, and supply chain integration. Leading firms typically demonstrate cross-functional strengths that combine advanced polymer development, scalable compounding and conversion capabilities, and a documented history of successful supply chain collaborations spanning feedstock providers to waste management partners. In addition, companies investing in application engineering to customize barrier properties, sealing performance, and finishing treatments tend to accelerate adoption among brand owners who require minimal redesign of existing packaging machinery.
Strategic alliances, joint ventures, and targeted acquisitions are common mechanisms to acquire complementary capabilities, whether that is access to novel biopolymers, expanded regional manufacturing footprints, or certification expertise. Similarly, firms that invest in pilot lines, third-party validation studies, and end-of-life trials with municipal composting partners gain credibility with procurement teams and regulatory stakeholders. For emerging entrants, differentiation is achieved by focusing on niche applications or proprietary formulations that address specific performance gaps, whereas incumbent players often leverage scale and distribution networks to offer integrated product-plus-service propositions.
Practical strategic actions for executives to secure supply continuity, validate end-of-life claims, and accelerate commercial adoption through collaboration and targeted investments
Industry leaders should prioritize a portfolio of actions that balance near-term commercial viability with long-term resilience. First, aligning product development with verified end-of-life pathways and third-party certification reduces reputational and regulatory risk while enabling clearer communication with customers. Second, diversifying supply chains by integrating regional suppliers and establishing contingency inventories helps cushion exposure to trade policy shocks and logistics disruptions. Prioritizing modular investments in converting equipment and retrofittable processing lines preserves flexibility and lowers capital intensity for pilots and scale-up.
Moreover, leaders should embed data-driven traceability into product labeling and customer communications to build trust and differentiate premium offerings. Investing in collaborative pilots with waste management and composting operators will deliver critical real-world performance data that can validate claims and inform iterative design improvements. Finally, proactive engagement with policymakers to harmonize definitions and standards can reduce compliance complexity and open new market channels, while targeted consumer education campaigns will help manage end-user expectations around disposal and performance.
A detailed explanation of the multi-method research approach combining expert interviews, technical literature synthesis, and data triangulation to underpin actionable insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined multiple qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, triangulated insights. Primary research included structured interviews with materials scientists, packaging engineers, procurement leaders, and waste management operators to capture operational realities and innovation trajectories. Secondary research involved a systematic review of peer-reviewed technical literature, regulatory texts, standards documents, and corporate disclosures to validate material properties, certification criteria, and policy trends.
Data synthesis followed a triangulation approach where findings from primary interviews were cross-checked against documented case studies and technical performance data. Scenario analysis was used to explore plausible strategic responses to trade and regulatory shifts without projecting specific market sizes or forecasts. Limitations included variability in regional infrastructure reporting and the proprietary nature of certain conversion performance metrics, which were mitigated by seeking multiple independent expert confirmations and noting areas where additional primary testing would enhance confidence. Ethical research practices governed sourcing and attribution throughout the study.
A conclusive synthesis of how technical validation, supply chain resilience, and transparent stakeholder engagement will determine long-term success in biodegradable packaging
In summary, biodegradable plastic packaging is at an inflection point where material innovation, regulatory clarity, and commercial pragmatism are converging to create scalable opportunities. The sector’s near-term trajectory will be shaped by the ability of manufacturers and brand owners to align product performance with verified end-of-life systems, absorb and adapt to trade policy changes, and communicate credible sustainability narratives to consumers. Those organizations that invest in cross-functional capabilities-spanning polymer development, converting processes, supply chain resiliency, and stakeholder engagement-will be best positioned to capture emerging opportunities while managing operational risks.
Looking ahead, success will require a balanced approach that integrates technical validation with commercial readiness. Strategic pilots that pair new materials with real-world waste management trials, coupled with rigorous certification and transparent reporting, will accelerate trust and adoption. Ultimately, the most resilient strategies will be those that recognize the interdependence of design, processing, policy, and end-of-life infrastructure and that commit resources to building collaborative ecosystems rather than pursuing isolated technical solutions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A comprehensive orientation to the forces shaping biodegradable plastic packaging and how stakeholders are aligning strategy with material and regulatory realities
Biodegradable plastic packaging has transitioned from niche experimentation to a mainstream priority for manufacturers, brand owners, regulators, and consumers seeking reduced environmental impact. This introduction outlines the converging forces shaping the sector: heightened regulatory scrutiny on single-use plastics, evolving consumer preferences toward transparent sustainability claims, advances in polymer science that expand performance parity with conventional plastics, and the maturation of end-of-life infrastructure including industrial composting and anaerobic digestion. Taken together, these dynamics are influencing material selection, product design, and value chain partnerships across multiple packaging formats.
Transitioning from awareness to application requires pragmatic alignment between environmental objectives and commercial realities. Industry leaders must weigh material properties such as barrier performance, mechanical strength, and processability against operational constraints including production throughput and recycling stream contamination risks. Meanwhile, procurement and innovation teams are increasingly focused on traceability, certification and the ability to demonstrate cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-grave pathways. As a result, strategies that combine material innovation with supply chain coordination and transparent communication are gaining traction as effective levers for scalable adoption.
How recent advances in polymer science, regulatory clarity, and consumer transparency are fundamentally reconfiguring production, procurement, and innovation strategies
The landscape of biodegradable plastic packaging is experiencing transformative shifts driven by technology, policy, and evolving consumer expectations. Advances in polymer chemistry and processing have produced higher-performance alternatives that close the gap with traditional plastics in barrier properties, clarity, and thermo-mechanical stability. In parallel, design-for-composting and design-for-recycling principles are being codified into product development roadmaps, forcing cross-functional collaboration between R&D, design, and operations teams.
Policy change is another accelerator of transformation, with regulators instituting clearer definitions for compostability and biodegradability, tightening labeling requirements, and incentivizing infrastructure investments for organics processing. These measures create both compliance obligations and market opportunities for manufacturers that can align product attributes with documented end-of-life pathways. Concurrently, brand owners are responding to more sophisticated consumer expectations for transparency by adopting digital traceability tools and third-party certification to validate sustainability claims. Taken together, these technological and institutional shifts are reconfiguring procurement criteria, enhancing supply chain scrutiny, and elevating sustainability from a marketing differentiator to a core operational imperative.
Understanding how the 2025 United States tariff adjustments reoriented sourcing, cost structures, and supplier relationships across biodegradable plastic packaging supply chains
The cumulative effects of U.S. tariff policy changes enacted in 2025 introduced a new layer of complexity across import-dependent segments of the biodegradable plastic packaging ecosystem. Tariff adjustments influenced cost structures for feedstocks, intermediates such as biopolymer resins, and finished packaging imported from key manufacturing hubs. As a consequence, manufacturers and brand owners recalibrated supplier sourcing strategies to mitigate exposure to tariff-driven price volatility while also assessing total landed costs that incorporate logistics, duties, and compliance overhead.
In response, several procurement teams adopted a dual approach: near-term tactical adjustments to supply chains to preserve continuity, and mid-term strategic repositioning that prioritizes supplier diversity and regional manufacturing partnerships. The tariff changes also prompted more robust contractual provisions around force majeure, cost escalation clauses, and longer-term supplier performance guarantees. On the demand side, some downstream value chain actors accelerated local sourcing and private-label production to maintain margin resilience. Importantly, the tariff environment catalyzed conversations with policymakers about harmonized standards that could reduce non-tariff barriers and support interoperable certification for biodegradable materials. Collectively, these responses illustrate how trade policy can rapidly reorient commercial and strategic priorities without undermining the sector’s long-term sustainability trajectory.
A nuanced segmentation-driven perspective revealing how form, application, polymer type, and channel dynamics determine prioritized investments and adoption pathways
Segment analysis reveals differentiated dynamics across form, application, product type, and sales channels that shape adoption pathways and investment priorities. Within form, coating and laminate formats-segmented into solvent based and water based subtypes-are often prioritized for high-barrier applications that require tailored surface treatments and adhesive strategies, while film and bag formats-distinguished between bag and film-are central to flexible packaging strategies that emphasize lightweighting and reduced material use. Rigid containers, subdivided into blow molded and injection molded types, remain critical for applications demanding mechanical strength and reclosure performance, and they drive investment in processing equipment and material stabilization technologies.
Across application segments, agriculture, beverage packaging, consumer goods packaging, food packaging, and medical and pharmaceutical packaging each impose unique performance, regulatory, and traceability requirements. Product type differentiation-spanning cellulose acetate, polybutylene adipate terephthalate, polybutylene succinate, polyhydroxyalkanoates, polylactic acid, and starch blend formulations-creates a matrix of trade-offs between biodegradability, processability, cost, and functional properties. Finally, sales channel dynamics subdivide into direct sales, online retail, specialty store, and supermarket and hypermarket pathways, with each channel exerting distinct influences on packaging format preferences, required certifications, and end-consumer expectations. Integrated consideration of these segmentation dimensions clarifies where technical innovation, commercial partnerships, and certification efforts will have the largest payoff for scale and market acceptance.
Regional contrasts in policy, infrastructure, and manufacturing capacity that dictate differentiated commercial strategies across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional perspectives reveal heterogeneous maturity, regulatory approaches, and infrastructure readiness across the global marketplace. In the Americas, regulatory focus and private sector initiatives converge around reducing single-use waste and expanding composting infrastructure, which fosters market opportunities for materials compatible with industrial and municipal organic processing. The Americas also exhibit strong collaboration between brand owners and waste management providers to pilot circular systems that link packaging design with collect-and-process capabilities.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, policy frameworks and extended producer responsibility mechanisms create a more prescriptive environment that necessitates compliance-oriented product development and detailed documentation of end-of-life performance. Within this region, certification regimes and standardized labeling have become influential in shaping cross-border trade and consumer trust. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid industrialization and large-scale manufacturing capacity coexist with significant investment in material innovation and logistics optimization. While infrastructure gaps remain in certain markets, the Asia-Pacific region is notable for its role in scaling production and process innovation that can improve cost competitiveness and availability of biodegradable alternatives. Each region’s distinct policy priorities, infrastructure development trajectories, and market channels inform tailored commercialization strategies.
How leadership in materials science, processing scale, and collaborative partnerships determines competitive advantage and accelerates market acceptance
Competitive dynamics in the biodegradable plastic packaging sector are characterized by differentiated capabilities across materials expertise, processing technologies, certification track records, and supply chain integration. Leading firms typically demonstrate cross-functional strengths that combine advanced polymer development, scalable compounding and conversion capabilities, and a documented history of successful supply chain collaborations spanning feedstock providers to waste management partners. In addition, companies investing in application engineering to customize barrier properties, sealing performance, and finishing treatments tend to accelerate adoption among brand owners who require minimal redesign of existing packaging machinery.
Strategic alliances, joint ventures, and targeted acquisitions are common mechanisms to acquire complementary capabilities, whether that is access to novel biopolymers, expanded regional manufacturing footprints, or certification expertise. Similarly, firms that invest in pilot lines, third-party validation studies, and end-of-life trials with municipal composting partners gain credibility with procurement teams and regulatory stakeholders. For emerging entrants, differentiation is achieved by focusing on niche applications or proprietary formulations that address specific performance gaps, whereas incumbent players often leverage scale and distribution networks to offer integrated product-plus-service propositions.
Practical strategic actions for executives to secure supply continuity, validate end-of-life claims, and accelerate commercial adoption through collaboration and targeted investments
Industry leaders should prioritize a portfolio of actions that balance near-term commercial viability with long-term resilience. First, aligning product development with verified end-of-life pathways and third-party certification reduces reputational and regulatory risk while enabling clearer communication with customers. Second, diversifying supply chains by integrating regional suppliers and establishing contingency inventories helps cushion exposure to trade policy shocks and logistics disruptions. Prioritizing modular investments in converting equipment and retrofittable processing lines preserves flexibility and lowers capital intensity for pilots and scale-up.
Moreover, leaders should embed data-driven traceability into product labeling and customer communications to build trust and differentiate premium offerings. Investing in collaborative pilots with waste management and composting operators will deliver critical real-world performance data that can validate claims and inform iterative design improvements. Finally, proactive engagement with policymakers to harmonize definitions and standards can reduce compliance complexity and open new market channels, while targeted consumer education campaigns will help manage end-user expectations around disposal and performance.
A detailed explanation of the multi-method research approach combining expert interviews, technical literature synthesis, and data triangulation to underpin actionable insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined multiple qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, triangulated insights. Primary research included structured interviews with materials scientists, packaging engineers, procurement leaders, and waste management operators to capture operational realities and innovation trajectories. Secondary research involved a systematic review of peer-reviewed technical literature, regulatory texts, standards documents, and corporate disclosures to validate material properties, certification criteria, and policy trends.
Data synthesis followed a triangulation approach where findings from primary interviews were cross-checked against documented case studies and technical performance data. Scenario analysis was used to explore plausible strategic responses to trade and regulatory shifts without projecting specific market sizes or forecasts. Limitations included variability in regional infrastructure reporting and the proprietary nature of certain conversion performance metrics, which were mitigated by seeking multiple independent expert confirmations and noting areas where additional primary testing would enhance confidence. Ethical research practices governed sourcing and attribution throughout the study.
A conclusive synthesis of how technical validation, supply chain resilience, and transparent stakeholder engagement will determine long-term success in biodegradable packaging
In summary, biodegradable plastic packaging is at an inflection point where material innovation, regulatory clarity, and commercial pragmatism are converging to create scalable opportunities. The sector’s near-term trajectory will be shaped by the ability of manufacturers and brand owners to align product performance with verified end-of-life systems, absorb and adapt to trade policy changes, and communicate credible sustainability narratives to consumers. Those organizations that invest in cross-functional capabilities-spanning polymer development, converting processes, supply chain resiliency, and stakeholder engagement-will be best positioned to capture emerging opportunities while managing operational risks.
Looking ahead, success will require a balanced approach that integrates technical validation with commercial readiness. Strategic pilots that pair new materials with real-world waste management trials, coupled with rigorous certification and transparent reporting, will accelerate trust and adoption. Ultimately, the most resilient strategies will be those that recognize the interdependence of design, processing, policy, and end-of-life infrastructure and that commit resources to building collaborative ecosystems rather than pursuing isolated technical solutions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Expansion of marine biodegradable polymer research to reduce ocean pollution
- 5.2. Integration of agricultural waste feedstocks for bio based packaging resin production
- 5.3. Consumer demand for transparent lifecycle labeling on biodegradable packaging materials
- 5.4. Collaboration between packaging manufacturers and e commerce platforms to reduce plastic waste
- 5.5. Advancements in enzyme based recycling systems to improve polymer breakdown efficiency
- 5.6. Implementation of industrial composting infrastructure to meet rising biodegradable packaging volumes
- 5.7. Development of bio based barrier coatings for extended shelf life of perishable goods
- 5.8. Regulatory harmonization of single use packaging bans across key global markets affecting industry practices
- 5.9. Investment in circular economy partnerships between brands and waste management service providers
- 5.10. Technical challenges in matching mechanical strength of biodegradable plastics with commodity polymers
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Biodegradable Plastic Packaging Market, by Form
- 8.1. Coating & Laminate
- 8.1.1. Solvent Based
- 8.1.2. Water Based
- 8.2. Film & Bag
- 8.2.1. Bag
- 8.2.2. Film
- 8.3. Rigid Container
- 8.3.1. Blow Molded
- 8.3.2. Injection Molded
- 9. Biodegradable Plastic Packaging Market, by Application
- 9.1. Agriculture
- 9.2. Beverage Packaging
- 9.3. Consumer Goods Packaging
- 9.4. Food Packaging
- 9.5. Medical & Pharmaceutical Packaging
- 10. Biodegradable Plastic Packaging Market, by Product Type
- 10.1. Cellulose Acetate
- 10.2. Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate
- 10.3. Polybutylene Succinate
- 10.4. Polyhydroxyalkanoates
- 10.5. Polylactic Acid
- 10.6. Starch Blend
- 11. Biodegradable Plastic Packaging Market, by Sales Channel
- 11.1. Online
- 11.2. Offline
- 11.2.1. Supermarket & Hypermarket
- 11.2.2. Specialty Store
- 12. Biodegradable Plastic Packaging Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Biodegradable Plastic Packaging Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Biodegradable Plastic Packaging Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Amcor plc
- 15.3.2. Arkema S.A.
- 15.3.3. Asahi Kasei Corporation
- 15.3.4. Avantium N.V.
- 15.3.5. BASF SE
- 15.3.6. BioBag International AS
- 15.3.7. Biome Bioplastics Limited
- 15.3.8. Cardia Bioplastics
- 15.3.9. Corbion N.V.
- 15.3.10. Cortec Corporation
- 15.3.11. Covestro AG
- 15.3.12. Danimer Scientific
- 15.3.13. Eastman Chemical Company
- 15.3.14. FKuR Kunststoff GmbH
- 15.3.15. Futamura Group
- 15.3.16. good natured Products Inc
- 15.3.17. Green Dot Bioplastics
- 15.3.18. Huhtamaki Oyj
- 15.3.19. Kuraray Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.20. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
- 15.3.21. Mondi plc
- 15.3.22. NatureWorks LLC
- 15.3.23. Novamont S.p.A.
- 15.3.24. Tetra Pak International S.A.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
