Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate Market by Feedstock (Cassava, Corn, Sugarcane), Resin Type (Fully Bio-based PET, Partially Bio-based PET), Purity Grade, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate Market was valued at USD 936.98 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1,054.99 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 13.76%, reaching USD 2,628.41 million by 2032.
An integrative perspective on bio-based PET that frames renewable feedstocks, processing compatibility, and circular system requirements for strategic decision-makers
Bio-based polyethylene terephthalate has emerged as a focal point in the intersection of materials science, commercial packaging, and sustainable feedstock innovation. This introduction situates the material within a broader value chain transformation where renewable carbon sources and circular design principles are reshaping how stakeholders define performance, cost, and environmental credentials. Rather than a simple substitution for conventional petrochemical-derived PET, bio-based PET represents a systems-level shift that touches agriculture, polymer processing, consumer brands, and waste-management infrastructures.
As such, the conversation about bio-based PET must frame technical attributes alongside supply chain resilience and policy alignment. Stakeholders are increasingly evaluating resin pathways against feedstock availability, processing compatibility, and end-of-life outcomes. In many contexts, regulatory momentum and corporate sustainability pledges are accelerating adoption, while manufacturing scale-up and certification frameworks continue to evolve. This introduction therefore prepares the reader to consider bio-based PET as an integrated solution that requires coordinated strategies across sourcing, production, product design, and market activation.
How feedstock diversification, polymerization breakthroughs, and circular economy strategies are reshaping competitiveness and adoption trajectories across the bio-based PET value chain
The landscape for bio-based PET is undergoing several transformative shifts that are redefining competitive positioning and technology roadmaps across the value chain. Advances in feedstock conversion, coupled with greater diversity of agricultural inputs and biochemical pathways, are expanding the raw-material palette available to resin producers. At the same time, innovations in catalyst design and polymerization techniques are narrowing performance gaps between bio-based and conventional PET, enabling broader application parity without sacrificing mechanical or optical properties.
Concurrently, regulatory narratives and corporate net-zero commitments are prompting faster integration of verifiable sustainability credentials into procurement specifications. This has produced new commercial relationships between agribusinesses, resin manufacturers, brand owners, and recyclers where feedstock traceability and certification play increasingly prominent roles. Transitioning technologies such as chemical recycling are also influencing how bio-based solutions are positioned; instead of being viewed solely as primary-material replacements, these materials are being considered within hybrid circular strategies that combine renewable input and advanced reclamation to close material loops.
Evaluating the multifaceted consequences of updated United States trade measures on supply chain resilience, sourcing strategies, and commercial contracting within the bio-based PET ecosystem
The introduction of new tariff measures in the United States has exerted a multifaceted influence on supply chains, sourcing decisions, and strategic priorities for market participants in 2025. Tariff-driven cost differentials have prompted brands and converters to reassess inbound material strategies, with a noticeable shift toward higher domestic content in procurement specifications and strengthened bilateral sourcing relationships with low-risk suppliers. As a result, suppliers with integrated upstream capabilities or regional production footprints are positioned to capture reallocated demand that once flowed across borders.
These trade policy changes have also amplified the focus on supply chain resilience. Companies are placing greater emphasis on dual sourcing, buffer inventories, and supplier development programs to hedge against tariff fluctuation and administrative uncertainty. In parallel, the tariffs have accelerated conversations about nearshoring and investment in local processing assets, since proximity can mitigate the combined impacts of duty, logistics delays, and regulatory friction. Finally, the trade environment has influenced contract terms and risk-sharing arrangements between buyers and suppliers, with more explicit clauses addressing tariff pass-through, force majeure, and adjustment mechanisms to preserve commercial continuity.
Segment-driven clarity on feedstock choices, resin configurations, purity distinctions, and application-specific performance demands that shape commercialization priorities for bio-based PET
Parsing the market through segmentation lenses clarifies where commercial and technical attention is most concentrated and where differentiated value propositions emerge. When the market is studied by feedstock, attention falls on cassava, corn, and sugarcane as each pathway presents distinct agronomic footprints, geographic concentrations, and upstream logistics considerations that influence feedstock risk profiles and cost volatility. These differences matter for long-term sourcing agreements and for companies seeking to demonstrate low indirect land-use impacts or to secure region-specific sustainability credits.
Examining resin type highlights a key commercial dynamic between fully bio-based PET and partially bio-based PET, as manufacturers balance purity, blend compatibility, and cost-to-performance trade-offs. From a purity grade perspective, distinctions between food grade and industrial grade determine the regulatory pathways, certification needs, and end-market acceptability across highly regulated segments such as beverages and pharmaceuticals. Application segmentation illuminates product-level drivers: bottles, fiber, film and sheet, and strapping each demand tailored resin formulations and processing conditions. Within bottles, the split between carbonated drinks and water bottles informs gas-barrier considerations and clarity requirements; within fiber, the divergence between filament fiber and staple fiber frames tensile and dyeing behavior; within film and sheet, the technical contrast between biaxial and monoaxial orientations shapes formability and strength; and within strapping, the operational differentiation between machine and manual formats guides thickness, elongation, and seam performance. Together, these segmentation dimensions reveal where technical innovation, certification pathways, and customer specification alignment will determine commercial traction.
How distinct regional resource endowments, regulatory frameworks, and recycling infrastructures across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dictate differentiated adoption and supply strategies
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on feedstock accessibility, policy incentives, and downstream adoption rates across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, agricultural scale and existing logistics corridors enable relatively predictable supply of certain starch- and sugar-derived feedstocks, while domestic policy frameworks and corporate sustainability programs drive localized investment in processing and supply-chain integration. These factors make regional partnerships and contract manufacturing especially consequential for market entry.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigour, extended producer responsibility schemes, and consumer expectations about recyclability and lifecycle impacts shape demand for certified bio-based solutions. Certification frameworks and circularity requirements in these markets require manufacturers to provide robust environmental declarations and to align with regional recycling infrastructures. In Asia-Pacific, the story is one of feedstock abundance in several jurisdictions and rapidly expanding manufacturing capacity, which together accelerate both upstream feedstock integration and downstream conversion scale-up. However, the region also exhibits wide heterogeneity in regulatory maturity and collection systems, meaning that local market strategies must adapt to variable recycling performance and differing procurement priorities.
Competitive and collaborative strategies among upstream suppliers, specialty resin developers, and end-users that determine which players capture value as bio-based PET matures commercially
Competitive dynamics in the bio-based PET arena are being shaped by a mix of incumbent chemical producers, specialty resin innovators, and vertically integrated value chain participants that pursue distinct routes to market. Many firms are focusing on securing feedstock supply through long-term contracts or strategic investments in agricultural partnerships to reduce upstream volatility and to improve traceability. Others are orienting around technological differentiation, investing in proprietary conversion processes or catalyst systems to improve yield, quality, and production efficiency.
Strategic collaboration is a recurring theme; alliances between resin producers, packaging converters, brand owners, and recycling companies are becoming a primary mechanism to validate circular claims and to scale closed-loop systems. At the same time, companies are calibrating their go-to-market approaches between white-label supply to converters and co-branded propositions aimed at premium segments willing to pay for verified sustainability credentials. These choices shape where companies invest in quality systems, certification, and marketing, and they inform the partnerships needed to secure both upstream feedstock continuity and downstream end-market acceptance.
Concrete strategic steps for procurement, processing validation, collaborative partnerships, and communication protocols to accelerate reliable scale-up of bio-based PET solutions
Industry leaders preparing to scale bio-based PET should adopt a sequence of actionable measures that align procurement, technology, and customer engagement. First, prioritize feedstock diversification and transparent traceability systems to limit exposure to single-source risks while demonstrating verifiable sustainability attributes. Second, invest in processing trials and compatibility testing to ensure new resin grades integrate with existing converters’ equipment and maintain product performance, particularly for sensitive applications like carbonated beverage containers and textile fibers.
Next, establish strategic partnerships across the supply chain to share risk and accelerate commercialization; these partnerships can include joint sourcing agreements, shared investments in pilot facilities, and coordinated approaches to certification and claims substantiation. In parallel, develop clear labeling and communication protocols that align with regional regulatory frameworks to avoid ambiguous sustainability claims and to build consumer trust. Finally, incorporate scenario-driven procurement strategies and contract clauses that explicitly address trade-policy volatility and cost pass-through mechanisms, while allocating resources for continuous monitoring of recycling infrastructure developments and emerging reclamation technologies to preserve long-term material value.
An evidence-driven, mixed-methods research design using expert interviews, supply chain mapping, lifecycle assessment, and scenario analysis to ensure robust strategic guidance
The research approach combines qualitative and quantitative methods designed to triangulate technical, commercial, and policy perspectives. Primary research included structured interviews with material scientists, supply-chain managers, brand sustainability leads, and waste-management operators to capture operational realities and adoption constraints. Secondary research drew upon peer-reviewed literature, technical standards, and public policy documents to contextualize innovation trajectories and regulatory drivers, while avoiding proprietary market-sizing sources.
Analytical methods incorporated supply chain mapping to identify critical nodes and choke points, lifecycle assessment frameworks to compare cradle-to-gate and end-of-life outcomes across feedstock pathways, and scenario analysis to assess the implications of policy shifts and trade measures. Data validation relied on cross-referencing interview insights with technical specifications and published certification criteria. This mixed-methods approach ensures that strategic recommendations are grounded in both stakeholder perspectives and technical feasibility assessments, enabling robust guidance for executives and technical teams alike.
A strategic synthesis emphasizing traceability, technical validation, and cross-sector alignment as the foundational elements for sustainable commercialization of bio-based PET
In conclusion, bio-based PET occupies a strategic nexus between renewable feedstocks, polymer innovation, and circular-economy imperatives. The pathway to broader adoption entails coordinated progress on feedstock sourcing, resin performance parity, certification transparency, and integration with recycling infrastructures. Market participants that proactively align sourcing strategies, invest in compatibility testing, and build cross-sector partnerships will be better positioned to navigate policy shifts and trade disruptions while capturing first-mover advantages in specification-driven markets.
Ultimately, the transition is not solely a technical substitution but a systemic transformation that requires synchronized actions from agricultural suppliers, technology providers, converters, brands, and waste-management stakeholders. By emphasizing traceability, rigorous performance validation, and adaptable commercial contracts, organizations can translate sustainability ambitions into operational realities and sustainable competitive differentiation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An integrative perspective on bio-based PET that frames renewable feedstocks, processing compatibility, and circular system requirements for strategic decision-makers
Bio-based polyethylene terephthalate has emerged as a focal point in the intersection of materials science, commercial packaging, and sustainable feedstock innovation. This introduction situates the material within a broader value chain transformation where renewable carbon sources and circular design principles are reshaping how stakeholders define performance, cost, and environmental credentials. Rather than a simple substitution for conventional petrochemical-derived PET, bio-based PET represents a systems-level shift that touches agriculture, polymer processing, consumer brands, and waste-management infrastructures.
As such, the conversation about bio-based PET must frame technical attributes alongside supply chain resilience and policy alignment. Stakeholders are increasingly evaluating resin pathways against feedstock availability, processing compatibility, and end-of-life outcomes. In many contexts, regulatory momentum and corporate sustainability pledges are accelerating adoption, while manufacturing scale-up and certification frameworks continue to evolve. This introduction therefore prepares the reader to consider bio-based PET as an integrated solution that requires coordinated strategies across sourcing, production, product design, and market activation.
How feedstock diversification, polymerization breakthroughs, and circular economy strategies are reshaping competitiveness and adoption trajectories across the bio-based PET value chain
The landscape for bio-based PET is undergoing several transformative shifts that are redefining competitive positioning and technology roadmaps across the value chain. Advances in feedstock conversion, coupled with greater diversity of agricultural inputs and biochemical pathways, are expanding the raw-material palette available to resin producers. At the same time, innovations in catalyst design and polymerization techniques are narrowing performance gaps between bio-based and conventional PET, enabling broader application parity without sacrificing mechanical or optical properties.
Concurrently, regulatory narratives and corporate net-zero commitments are prompting faster integration of verifiable sustainability credentials into procurement specifications. This has produced new commercial relationships between agribusinesses, resin manufacturers, brand owners, and recyclers where feedstock traceability and certification play increasingly prominent roles. Transitioning technologies such as chemical recycling are also influencing how bio-based solutions are positioned; instead of being viewed solely as primary-material replacements, these materials are being considered within hybrid circular strategies that combine renewable input and advanced reclamation to close material loops.
Evaluating the multifaceted consequences of updated United States trade measures on supply chain resilience, sourcing strategies, and commercial contracting within the bio-based PET ecosystem
The introduction of new tariff measures in the United States has exerted a multifaceted influence on supply chains, sourcing decisions, and strategic priorities for market participants in 2025. Tariff-driven cost differentials have prompted brands and converters to reassess inbound material strategies, with a noticeable shift toward higher domestic content in procurement specifications and strengthened bilateral sourcing relationships with low-risk suppliers. As a result, suppliers with integrated upstream capabilities or regional production footprints are positioned to capture reallocated demand that once flowed across borders.
These trade policy changes have also amplified the focus on supply chain resilience. Companies are placing greater emphasis on dual sourcing, buffer inventories, and supplier development programs to hedge against tariff fluctuation and administrative uncertainty. In parallel, the tariffs have accelerated conversations about nearshoring and investment in local processing assets, since proximity can mitigate the combined impacts of duty, logistics delays, and regulatory friction. Finally, the trade environment has influenced contract terms and risk-sharing arrangements between buyers and suppliers, with more explicit clauses addressing tariff pass-through, force majeure, and adjustment mechanisms to preserve commercial continuity.
Segment-driven clarity on feedstock choices, resin configurations, purity distinctions, and application-specific performance demands that shape commercialization priorities for bio-based PET
Parsing the market through segmentation lenses clarifies where commercial and technical attention is most concentrated and where differentiated value propositions emerge. When the market is studied by feedstock, attention falls on cassava, corn, and sugarcane as each pathway presents distinct agronomic footprints, geographic concentrations, and upstream logistics considerations that influence feedstock risk profiles and cost volatility. These differences matter for long-term sourcing agreements and for companies seeking to demonstrate low indirect land-use impacts or to secure region-specific sustainability credits.
Examining resin type highlights a key commercial dynamic between fully bio-based PET and partially bio-based PET, as manufacturers balance purity, blend compatibility, and cost-to-performance trade-offs. From a purity grade perspective, distinctions between food grade and industrial grade determine the regulatory pathways, certification needs, and end-market acceptability across highly regulated segments such as beverages and pharmaceuticals. Application segmentation illuminates product-level drivers: bottles, fiber, film and sheet, and strapping each demand tailored resin formulations and processing conditions. Within bottles, the split between carbonated drinks and water bottles informs gas-barrier considerations and clarity requirements; within fiber, the divergence between filament fiber and staple fiber frames tensile and dyeing behavior; within film and sheet, the technical contrast between biaxial and monoaxial orientations shapes formability and strength; and within strapping, the operational differentiation between machine and manual formats guides thickness, elongation, and seam performance. Together, these segmentation dimensions reveal where technical innovation, certification pathways, and customer specification alignment will determine commercial traction.
How distinct regional resource endowments, regulatory frameworks, and recycling infrastructures across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dictate differentiated adoption and supply strategies
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on feedstock accessibility, policy incentives, and downstream adoption rates across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, agricultural scale and existing logistics corridors enable relatively predictable supply of certain starch- and sugar-derived feedstocks, while domestic policy frameworks and corporate sustainability programs drive localized investment in processing and supply-chain integration. These factors make regional partnerships and contract manufacturing especially consequential for market entry.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigour, extended producer responsibility schemes, and consumer expectations about recyclability and lifecycle impacts shape demand for certified bio-based solutions. Certification frameworks and circularity requirements in these markets require manufacturers to provide robust environmental declarations and to align with regional recycling infrastructures. In Asia-Pacific, the story is one of feedstock abundance in several jurisdictions and rapidly expanding manufacturing capacity, which together accelerate both upstream feedstock integration and downstream conversion scale-up. However, the region also exhibits wide heterogeneity in regulatory maturity and collection systems, meaning that local market strategies must adapt to variable recycling performance and differing procurement priorities.
Competitive and collaborative strategies among upstream suppliers, specialty resin developers, and end-users that determine which players capture value as bio-based PET matures commercially
Competitive dynamics in the bio-based PET arena are being shaped by a mix of incumbent chemical producers, specialty resin innovators, and vertically integrated value chain participants that pursue distinct routes to market. Many firms are focusing on securing feedstock supply through long-term contracts or strategic investments in agricultural partnerships to reduce upstream volatility and to improve traceability. Others are orienting around technological differentiation, investing in proprietary conversion processes or catalyst systems to improve yield, quality, and production efficiency.
Strategic collaboration is a recurring theme; alliances between resin producers, packaging converters, brand owners, and recycling companies are becoming a primary mechanism to validate circular claims and to scale closed-loop systems. At the same time, companies are calibrating their go-to-market approaches between white-label supply to converters and co-branded propositions aimed at premium segments willing to pay for verified sustainability credentials. These choices shape where companies invest in quality systems, certification, and marketing, and they inform the partnerships needed to secure both upstream feedstock continuity and downstream end-market acceptance.
Concrete strategic steps for procurement, processing validation, collaborative partnerships, and communication protocols to accelerate reliable scale-up of bio-based PET solutions
Industry leaders preparing to scale bio-based PET should adopt a sequence of actionable measures that align procurement, technology, and customer engagement. First, prioritize feedstock diversification and transparent traceability systems to limit exposure to single-source risks while demonstrating verifiable sustainability attributes. Second, invest in processing trials and compatibility testing to ensure new resin grades integrate with existing converters’ equipment and maintain product performance, particularly for sensitive applications like carbonated beverage containers and textile fibers.
Next, establish strategic partnerships across the supply chain to share risk and accelerate commercialization; these partnerships can include joint sourcing agreements, shared investments in pilot facilities, and coordinated approaches to certification and claims substantiation. In parallel, develop clear labeling and communication protocols that align with regional regulatory frameworks to avoid ambiguous sustainability claims and to build consumer trust. Finally, incorporate scenario-driven procurement strategies and contract clauses that explicitly address trade-policy volatility and cost pass-through mechanisms, while allocating resources for continuous monitoring of recycling infrastructure developments and emerging reclamation technologies to preserve long-term material value.
An evidence-driven, mixed-methods research design using expert interviews, supply chain mapping, lifecycle assessment, and scenario analysis to ensure robust strategic guidance
The research approach combines qualitative and quantitative methods designed to triangulate technical, commercial, and policy perspectives. Primary research included structured interviews with material scientists, supply-chain managers, brand sustainability leads, and waste-management operators to capture operational realities and adoption constraints. Secondary research drew upon peer-reviewed literature, technical standards, and public policy documents to contextualize innovation trajectories and regulatory drivers, while avoiding proprietary market-sizing sources.
Analytical methods incorporated supply chain mapping to identify critical nodes and choke points, lifecycle assessment frameworks to compare cradle-to-gate and end-of-life outcomes across feedstock pathways, and scenario analysis to assess the implications of policy shifts and trade measures. Data validation relied on cross-referencing interview insights with technical specifications and published certification criteria. This mixed-methods approach ensures that strategic recommendations are grounded in both stakeholder perspectives and technical feasibility assessments, enabling robust guidance for executives and technical teams alike.
A strategic synthesis emphasizing traceability, technical validation, and cross-sector alignment as the foundational elements for sustainable commercialization of bio-based PET
In conclusion, bio-based PET occupies a strategic nexus between renewable feedstocks, polymer innovation, and circular-economy imperatives. The pathway to broader adoption entails coordinated progress on feedstock sourcing, resin performance parity, certification transparency, and integration with recycling infrastructures. Market participants that proactively align sourcing strategies, invest in compatibility testing, and build cross-sector partnerships will be better positioned to navigate policy shifts and trade disruptions while capturing first-mover advantages in specification-driven markets.
Ultimately, the transition is not solely a technical substitution but a systemic transformation that requires synchronized actions from agricultural suppliers, technology providers, converters, brands, and waste-management stakeholders. By emphasizing traceability, rigorous performance validation, and adaptable commercial contracts, organizations can translate sustainability ambitions into operational realities and sustainable competitive differentiation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
188 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Expansion of advanced bio-catalytic processes to enhance the yield of bio-PET feedstocks and reduce production costs
- 5.2. Strategic partnerships between petrochemical giants and biotech firms driving scale-up of bio-based PET manufacturing capacity
- 5.3. Emergence of next-generation sugar feedstock from agricultural residues for sustainable bio-PET production and cost optimization
- 5.4. Implementation of circular economy initiatives through enhanced chemical recycling integrated with bio-PET supply chains
- 5.5. Regulatory momentum from EU and US bioeconomy policies accelerating investments in bio-based PET innovation and infrastructure
- 5.6. Consumer demand for transparent sustainability certifications boosting adoption of certified bio-based polyethylene terephthalate in packaging
- 5.7. Development of tailor-made bio-based PET copolymers for high-barrier packaging applications in food and beverage industries
- 5.8. Advances in enzymatic depolymerization enabling closed-loop recycling of bio-based PET beverage bottles and textiles
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate Market, by Feedstock
- 8.1. Cassava
- 8.2. Corn
- 8.3. Sugarcane
- 9. Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate Market, by Resin Type
- 9.1. Fully Bio-based PET
- 9.2. Partially Bio-based PET
- 10. Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate Market, by Purity Grade
- 10.1. Food Grade
- 10.2. Industrial Grade
- 11. Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate Market, by Application
- 11.1. Bottles
- 11.1.1. Carbonated Drinks
- 11.1.2. Water Bottles
- 11.2. Fiber
- 11.2.1. Filament Fiber
- 11.2.2. Staple Fiber
- 11.3. Film & Sheet
- 11.3.1. Biaxial
- 11.3.2. Monoaxial
- 11.4. Strapping
- 11.4.1. Machine
- 11.4.2. Manual
- 12. Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Indorama Ventures Public Company Limited
- 15.3.2. Biokunststofftool
- 15.3.3. Alpek S.A.B. de C.V.
- 15.3.4. SUNTORY HOLDINGS LIMITED
- 15.3.5. Teijin Limited
- 15.3.6. Plastipak Holdings, Inc.
- 15.3.7. Anellotech, Inc.
- 15.3.8. PepsiCo, Inc.
- 15.3.9. Danone S.A.
- 15.3.10. The Coca-Cola Company
- 15.3.11. Braskem S.A.
- 15.3.12. Alpla Werke Alwin Lehner GmbH & Co. KG
- 15.3.13. Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
- 15.3.14. LyondellBasell Industries Holdings B.V.
- 15.3.15. TotalEnergies SE
- 15.3.16. Origin Materials, Inc.
- 15.3.17. FKuR Kunststoff GmbH
- 15.3.18. Novamont S.p.A.
- 15.3.19. NatureWorks LLC
- 15.3.20. Toyota Tsusho Corporation
- 15.3.21. PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited
- 15.3.22. BioAmber Inc.
- 15.3.23. Virent, Inc.
- 15.3.24. Avantium N.V.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
