Bio-based Coatings Market by Technology (Powder Coating, Radiation-Curable, Solvent-Borne), Resin Type (Acrylic, Alkyd, Epoxy), Form, Application, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Bio-based Coatings Market was valued at USD 15.30 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 16.75 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.58%, reaching USD 31.81 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to bio-based coatings that frames evolving sustainability expectations, technical trade-offs, supply chain realities, and commercial drivers
Bio-based coatings have moved from niche formulations to a focal point of innovation across multiple industrial value chains. Rising environmental mandates, heightened customer expectations for sustainable products, and advances in polymer chemistry have collectively driven formulators and brand owners to reconsider raw material selection and production methods. At the same time, manufacturers balance performance demands such as durability, abrasion resistance, and UV stability with lifecycle considerations including renewability and end-of-life impacts, prompting a rethinking of conventional coating strategies.
In response, research and development teams increasingly pair traditional resins with bio-derived monomers, explore waterborne and radiation-curable platforms for lower emissions, and evaluate powder-based systems to reduce solvent use. As supply chains recover from earlier disruptions, procurement leaders prioritize supplier diversification and raw material traceability. Regulatory frameworks continue to shape choices, where certification claims and compliance with chemical reporting regimes have become critical commercial differentiators. Consequently, decision-makers must navigate a landscape where technical performance, sustainability credentials, and supply chain resilience interact dynamically to determine competitive positioning.
How technological advances, regulatory pressure, and buyer expectations are redefining competitive advantage in the bio-based coatings ecosystem
The bio-based coatings landscape has experienced several transformative shifts driven by technology, policy, and buyer preferences. Advances in resin chemistry and curing technologies have reduced historical trade-offs between performance and sustainability, enabling new formulations to meet stringent industrial specifications while lowering fossil-derived content. Concurrently, policy interventions and procurement standards have accelerated adoption, prompting enterprises to internalize lifecycle criteria and expand sustainability metrics beyond simple raw material origin.
Moreover, digital tools and material science platforms have improved formulation agility, allowing rapid prototyping and accelerated validation of novel bio-based chemistries. These capabilities have shortened development cycles and encouraged collaboration between material suppliers, OEMs, and end-users. At the same time, market participants face increasing scrutiny over origin claims and carbon accounting, leading to greater emphasis on transparent supply chains and third-party verification. Together, these forces have redefined competitive advantage: the ability to combine demonstrable environmental benefits with robust application performance now determines market acceptance and long-term brand value.
The 2025 tariff environment prompted rapid shifts in sourcing, nearshoring initiatives, and formulation strategies to protect margins and preserve lead times
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 altered strategic sourcing and commercial planning across the coatings value chain, generating both immediate operational impacts and longer-term strategic adjustments. Procurement teams responded by re-evaluating supplier portfolios to mitigate cost exposure and potential delivery disruptions, while manufacturers pursued nearshoring and regional partnerships to preserve lead times and reduce tariff-related costs. As a result, supply chain resilience became a primary objective, influencing supplier selection criteria beyond price alone.
In practical terms, product roadmaps adjusted to reflect shifting input costs and logistics dynamics. R&D groups prioritized substitutable raw materials and process efficiencies that could dampen the sensitivity of formulations to tariff fluctuations. Concurrently, trade compliance and legal teams intensified scenario planning to understand duty implications across tariff codes, helping commercial teams craft pricing strategies that balanced margin preservation with market competitiveness. Ultimately, the tariffs prompted a structural reassessment of how organizations manage cross-border value chains, accelerating moves toward diversified sourcing and localized production footprints to reduce exposure to future trade volatility.
In-depth segmentation framing that links end-use demands, curing technologies, resin chemistries, application roles, and product form factors to strategic priorities
Segmentation insights clarify where technical innovation and commercial opportunity intersect across diverse end-use requirements, technology platforms, resin chemistries, application functions, and product forms. End use industries span Automotive & Transportation, Buildings & Construction, General Industrial, Marine, Packaging, and Wood & Furniture, each imposing distinct performance and regulatory demands that shape formulation priorities and sales strategies. Technology platforms include Powder Coating, Radiation-Curable, Solvent-Borne, and Waterborne approaches, with Powder Coating further differentiated into Epoxy Powder, Epoxy-Polyester Hybrid, and Polyester Powder, and Radiation-Curable subdivided into EB-Curable and UV-Curable pathways that influence cure speed, equipment needs, and substrate compatibility.
Resin type segmentation covers Acrylic, Alkyd, Epoxy, Polyester, Polyurethane, and Silicone systems, with Alkyds differentiated into Natural Oil-Based and Synthetic options, and Polyesters classified as Saturated and Unsaturated variants; these distinctions determine properties such as flexibility, chemical resistance, and compatibility with bio-based monomers. Application-focused distinctions include Adhesive & Sealant, Clear Coat, Primer, and Topcoat uses, each with unique adhesion, transparency, and substrate protection criteria. Finally, the form factor-whether Liquid or Powder-shapes supply chain considerations, VOC exposure, and application equipment requirements. Taken together, these segment layers enable nuanced portfolio planning, targeted R&D investment, and tailored go-to-market approaches that align performance attributes with customer needs.
Regional dynamics and regulatory landscapes that compel tailored commercialization approaches across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics shape demand patterns, regulatory constraints, and competitive landscapes in ways that create distinct strategic imperatives across the globe. In the Americas, manufacturers often balance strong automotive and industrial demand with an increasing focus on sustainability procurement and supply-chain transparency, prompting investments in lower-VOC technologies and bio-derived resin integration. Collaboration between suppliers and regional OEMs supports co-development that addresses local performance standards and application conventions.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory pressures and ambitious decarbonization targets substantially influence product specifications, while mature industrial and construction sectors demand high-performance solutions with traceable sustainability credentials. This region drives early adoption of certification and circularity initiatives, thereby setting benchmarks that influence global buyers. The Asia-Pacific region combines rapid industrialization with strong manufacturing scale, creating both opportunities and challenges: rapid production capacity supports innovation diffusion, yet heterogeneous regulatory regimes and varied procurement behaviors require adaptable commercial models. In response, companies calibrate regional strategies to balance centralized R&D strengths with local production and regulatory compliance mechanisms.
Corporate landscape insights showing how scale, specialization, and collaborative models are reshaping R&D, commercialization, and competitive advantage
Company-level dynamics reveal a bifurcated competitive landscape where global formulators compete with specialized innovators and regional players. Large vertically integrated suppliers leverage scale, broad distribution networks, and established application expertise to support industrial programs and major OEM partnerships, while smaller specialty companies capitalize on agile development cycles and niche chemistries to serve high-value, performance-sensitive applications. Strategic collaboration between these types of companies-through licensing, joint development, or tailored supply agreements-has become an efficient route to combine scale with technical novelty.
Moreover, new entrants and startups focused on bio-derived intermediates and sustainable resin platforms are accelerating the pace of innovation, forcing incumbents to invest in R&D and inorganically expand capabilities. Sales and commercial teams increasingly emphasize proof points such as independent sustainability verification, application case studies, and shortened development timelines to win customer confidence. Internally, successful companies align procurement, R&D, and regulatory functions to reduce time-to-market for bio-based offerings and to ensure claims are substantiated across jurisdictional compliance regimes.
Actionable strategic imperatives for senior executives to align R&D, procurement, and commercial functions for resilient and sustainable growth
Leaders must adopt a multi-pronged approach to capitalize on the transition toward bio-based coatings while protecting margins and satisfying performance expectations. First, align product roadmaps with both technical targets and procurement constraints by prioritizing platform technologies that offer the best trade-offs between environmental attributes and durability. Invest in modular formulation architectures that allow substitution of bio-derived inputs without fundamentally changing application processes, which reduces time to commercialization and preserves existing customer relationships.
Second, strengthen supply chain resilience by qualifying multiple raw material sources, exploring regional feedstock partnerships, and implementing robust traceability systems. This reduces exposure to trade fluctuations and input scarcity. Third, enhance go-to-market differentiation through third-party verification of sustainability claims, rigorous performance validation in customer-specific environments, and transparent communication of lifecycle benefits. Fourth, cultivate cross-functional teams that integrate R&D, regulatory affairs, procurement, and commercial leadership to accelerate decision-making and ensure compliance. Finally, evaluate selective partnerships with innovators to access novel chemistries or processing capabilities, thereby complementing internal development and maintaining competitive agility as the market evolves.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach that integrates stakeholder interviews, technical literature, and regulatory review to produce actionable insights
The research methodology combines primary interviews with industry stakeholders, technical literature review, and systematic synthesis of publicly available regulatory and standards documentation to produce a rigorous, reproducible analysis. Primary engagement included conversations with formulators, purchasing leads, OEM technical teams, and coatings application specialists to capture first-hand perspectives on performance priorities, supply chain constraints, and product acceptance criteria. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with technical papers and patent activity to validate technology trajectories and identify emergent chemistries.
Secondary analysis encompassed a structured review of industry standards, certification schemes, and regulatory notices that influence product development and market access. The methodology also incorporated comparative assessment of process and equipment implications across technology platforms to ensure practical relevance. Throughout, the approach emphasized transparency in source attribution, clear articulation of assumptions, and scenario-oriented thinking to illustrate how variable conditions could influence strategic choices. This combination of methods supports actionable insights while protecting against single-source bias and ensuring applicability to real-world decision-making contexts.
Why integrated product, supply chain, and commercial strategies are critical to winning in the era of high-performance bio-based coatings
The move toward bio-based coatings represents both a technical evolution and a market-driven imperative. Organizations that successfully integrate bio-derived inputs while retaining or enhancing functional performance will secure durable advantages in regulated segments and among sustainability-minded customers. Those that delay will face mounting regulatory constraints and potential reputational exposure as supply chains and procurement policies shift in favor of verifiable sustainability credentials. Therefore, the transition demands coordinated action across product development, procurement, and commercial teams to align capabilities and claims.
In closing, the industry is at an inflection point where material innovation, regulatory frameworks, and customer expectations converge to favor adaptable, well-documented, high-performance bio-based solutions. Firms that combine disciplined R&D investment with supply chain diversification and credible sustainability communication will be best positioned to capture long-term value. Timely, integrated responses to these drivers will determine which companies lead the next phase of coatings innovation and which struggle to adapt to the new market realities.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to bio-based coatings that frames evolving sustainability expectations, technical trade-offs, supply chain realities, and commercial drivers
Bio-based coatings have moved from niche formulations to a focal point of innovation across multiple industrial value chains. Rising environmental mandates, heightened customer expectations for sustainable products, and advances in polymer chemistry have collectively driven formulators and brand owners to reconsider raw material selection and production methods. At the same time, manufacturers balance performance demands such as durability, abrasion resistance, and UV stability with lifecycle considerations including renewability and end-of-life impacts, prompting a rethinking of conventional coating strategies.
In response, research and development teams increasingly pair traditional resins with bio-derived monomers, explore waterborne and radiation-curable platforms for lower emissions, and evaluate powder-based systems to reduce solvent use. As supply chains recover from earlier disruptions, procurement leaders prioritize supplier diversification and raw material traceability. Regulatory frameworks continue to shape choices, where certification claims and compliance with chemical reporting regimes have become critical commercial differentiators. Consequently, decision-makers must navigate a landscape where technical performance, sustainability credentials, and supply chain resilience interact dynamically to determine competitive positioning.
How technological advances, regulatory pressure, and buyer expectations are redefining competitive advantage in the bio-based coatings ecosystem
The bio-based coatings landscape has experienced several transformative shifts driven by technology, policy, and buyer preferences. Advances in resin chemistry and curing technologies have reduced historical trade-offs between performance and sustainability, enabling new formulations to meet stringent industrial specifications while lowering fossil-derived content. Concurrently, policy interventions and procurement standards have accelerated adoption, prompting enterprises to internalize lifecycle criteria and expand sustainability metrics beyond simple raw material origin.
Moreover, digital tools and material science platforms have improved formulation agility, allowing rapid prototyping and accelerated validation of novel bio-based chemistries. These capabilities have shortened development cycles and encouraged collaboration between material suppliers, OEMs, and end-users. At the same time, market participants face increasing scrutiny over origin claims and carbon accounting, leading to greater emphasis on transparent supply chains and third-party verification. Together, these forces have redefined competitive advantage: the ability to combine demonstrable environmental benefits with robust application performance now determines market acceptance and long-term brand value.
The 2025 tariff environment prompted rapid shifts in sourcing, nearshoring initiatives, and formulation strategies to protect margins and preserve lead times
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 altered strategic sourcing and commercial planning across the coatings value chain, generating both immediate operational impacts and longer-term strategic adjustments. Procurement teams responded by re-evaluating supplier portfolios to mitigate cost exposure and potential delivery disruptions, while manufacturers pursued nearshoring and regional partnerships to preserve lead times and reduce tariff-related costs. As a result, supply chain resilience became a primary objective, influencing supplier selection criteria beyond price alone.
In practical terms, product roadmaps adjusted to reflect shifting input costs and logistics dynamics. R&D groups prioritized substitutable raw materials and process efficiencies that could dampen the sensitivity of formulations to tariff fluctuations. Concurrently, trade compliance and legal teams intensified scenario planning to understand duty implications across tariff codes, helping commercial teams craft pricing strategies that balanced margin preservation with market competitiveness. Ultimately, the tariffs prompted a structural reassessment of how organizations manage cross-border value chains, accelerating moves toward diversified sourcing and localized production footprints to reduce exposure to future trade volatility.
In-depth segmentation framing that links end-use demands, curing technologies, resin chemistries, application roles, and product form factors to strategic priorities
Segmentation insights clarify where technical innovation and commercial opportunity intersect across diverse end-use requirements, technology platforms, resin chemistries, application functions, and product forms. End use industries span Automotive & Transportation, Buildings & Construction, General Industrial, Marine, Packaging, and Wood & Furniture, each imposing distinct performance and regulatory demands that shape formulation priorities and sales strategies. Technology platforms include Powder Coating, Radiation-Curable, Solvent-Borne, and Waterborne approaches, with Powder Coating further differentiated into Epoxy Powder, Epoxy-Polyester Hybrid, and Polyester Powder, and Radiation-Curable subdivided into EB-Curable and UV-Curable pathways that influence cure speed, equipment needs, and substrate compatibility.
Resin type segmentation covers Acrylic, Alkyd, Epoxy, Polyester, Polyurethane, and Silicone systems, with Alkyds differentiated into Natural Oil-Based and Synthetic options, and Polyesters classified as Saturated and Unsaturated variants; these distinctions determine properties such as flexibility, chemical resistance, and compatibility with bio-based monomers. Application-focused distinctions include Adhesive & Sealant, Clear Coat, Primer, and Topcoat uses, each with unique adhesion, transparency, and substrate protection criteria. Finally, the form factor-whether Liquid or Powder-shapes supply chain considerations, VOC exposure, and application equipment requirements. Taken together, these segment layers enable nuanced portfolio planning, targeted R&D investment, and tailored go-to-market approaches that align performance attributes with customer needs.
Regional dynamics and regulatory landscapes that compel tailored commercialization approaches across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics shape demand patterns, regulatory constraints, and competitive landscapes in ways that create distinct strategic imperatives across the globe. In the Americas, manufacturers often balance strong automotive and industrial demand with an increasing focus on sustainability procurement and supply-chain transparency, prompting investments in lower-VOC technologies and bio-derived resin integration. Collaboration between suppliers and regional OEMs supports co-development that addresses local performance standards and application conventions.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory pressures and ambitious decarbonization targets substantially influence product specifications, while mature industrial and construction sectors demand high-performance solutions with traceable sustainability credentials. This region drives early adoption of certification and circularity initiatives, thereby setting benchmarks that influence global buyers. The Asia-Pacific region combines rapid industrialization with strong manufacturing scale, creating both opportunities and challenges: rapid production capacity supports innovation diffusion, yet heterogeneous regulatory regimes and varied procurement behaviors require adaptable commercial models. In response, companies calibrate regional strategies to balance centralized R&D strengths with local production and regulatory compliance mechanisms.
Corporate landscape insights showing how scale, specialization, and collaborative models are reshaping R&D, commercialization, and competitive advantage
Company-level dynamics reveal a bifurcated competitive landscape where global formulators compete with specialized innovators and regional players. Large vertically integrated suppliers leverage scale, broad distribution networks, and established application expertise to support industrial programs and major OEM partnerships, while smaller specialty companies capitalize on agile development cycles and niche chemistries to serve high-value, performance-sensitive applications. Strategic collaboration between these types of companies-through licensing, joint development, or tailored supply agreements-has become an efficient route to combine scale with technical novelty.
Moreover, new entrants and startups focused on bio-derived intermediates and sustainable resin platforms are accelerating the pace of innovation, forcing incumbents to invest in R&D and inorganically expand capabilities. Sales and commercial teams increasingly emphasize proof points such as independent sustainability verification, application case studies, and shortened development timelines to win customer confidence. Internally, successful companies align procurement, R&D, and regulatory functions to reduce time-to-market for bio-based offerings and to ensure claims are substantiated across jurisdictional compliance regimes.
Actionable strategic imperatives for senior executives to align R&D, procurement, and commercial functions for resilient and sustainable growth
Leaders must adopt a multi-pronged approach to capitalize on the transition toward bio-based coatings while protecting margins and satisfying performance expectations. First, align product roadmaps with both technical targets and procurement constraints by prioritizing platform technologies that offer the best trade-offs between environmental attributes and durability. Invest in modular formulation architectures that allow substitution of bio-derived inputs without fundamentally changing application processes, which reduces time to commercialization and preserves existing customer relationships.
Second, strengthen supply chain resilience by qualifying multiple raw material sources, exploring regional feedstock partnerships, and implementing robust traceability systems. This reduces exposure to trade fluctuations and input scarcity. Third, enhance go-to-market differentiation through third-party verification of sustainability claims, rigorous performance validation in customer-specific environments, and transparent communication of lifecycle benefits. Fourth, cultivate cross-functional teams that integrate R&D, regulatory affairs, procurement, and commercial leadership to accelerate decision-making and ensure compliance. Finally, evaluate selective partnerships with innovators to access novel chemistries or processing capabilities, thereby complementing internal development and maintaining competitive agility as the market evolves.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach that integrates stakeholder interviews, technical literature, and regulatory review to produce actionable insights
The research methodology combines primary interviews with industry stakeholders, technical literature review, and systematic synthesis of publicly available regulatory and standards documentation to produce a rigorous, reproducible analysis. Primary engagement included conversations with formulators, purchasing leads, OEM technical teams, and coatings application specialists to capture first-hand perspectives on performance priorities, supply chain constraints, and product acceptance criteria. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with technical papers and patent activity to validate technology trajectories and identify emergent chemistries.
Secondary analysis encompassed a structured review of industry standards, certification schemes, and regulatory notices that influence product development and market access. The methodology also incorporated comparative assessment of process and equipment implications across technology platforms to ensure practical relevance. Throughout, the approach emphasized transparency in source attribution, clear articulation of assumptions, and scenario-oriented thinking to illustrate how variable conditions could influence strategic choices. This combination of methods supports actionable insights while protecting against single-source bias and ensuring applicability to real-world decision-making contexts.
Why integrated product, supply chain, and commercial strategies are critical to winning in the era of high-performance bio-based coatings
The move toward bio-based coatings represents both a technical evolution and a market-driven imperative. Organizations that successfully integrate bio-derived inputs while retaining or enhancing functional performance will secure durable advantages in regulated segments and among sustainability-minded customers. Those that delay will face mounting regulatory constraints and potential reputational exposure as supply chains and procurement policies shift in favor of verifiable sustainability credentials. Therefore, the transition demands coordinated action across product development, procurement, and commercial teams to align capabilities and claims.
In closing, the industry is at an inflection point where material innovation, regulatory frameworks, and customer expectations converge to favor adaptable, well-documented, high-performance bio-based solutions. Firms that combine disciplined R&D investment with supply chain diversification and credible sustainability communication will be best positioned to capture long-term value. Timely, integrated responses to these drivers will determine which companies lead the next phase of coatings innovation and which struggle to adapt to the new market realities.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
193 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Development of lignin-based polyurethane coatings enhancing mechanical strength and biodegradability
- 5.2. Innovation in algae-derived polymer coatings reducing carbon footprint in industrial applications
- 5.3. Scaling up cellulose nanocrystal incorporation for high-performance bio-based protective coatings
- 5.4. Commercialization of soybean oil epoxidized coatings with improved corrosion resistance and durability
- 5.5. Adoption of microbial fermentation processes for cost-effective bio-resin production in coatings
- 5.6. Integration of waste-derived bio-fillers to improve thermal stability of eco-friendly coating systems
- 5.7. Regulatory incentives driving shift toward non-toxic bio-based resins in architectural coatings
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Bio-based Coatings Market, by Technology
- 8.1. Powder Coating
- 8.1.1. Epoxy Powder
- 8.1.2. Polyester Powder
- 8.2. Radiation-Curable
- 8.2.1. EB-Curable
- 8.2.2. UV-Curable
- 8.3. Solvent-Borne
- 8.4. Waterborne
- 9. Bio-based Coatings Market, by Resin Type
- 9.1. Acrylic
- 9.2. Alkyd
- 9.2.1. Natural Oil-Based
- 9.2.2. Synthetic
- 9.3. Epoxy
- 9.4. Polyester
- 9.4.1. Saturated
- 9.4.2. Unsaturated
- 9.5. Polyurethane
- 9.6. Silicone
- 10. Bio-based Coatings Market, by Form
- 10.1. Liquid
- 10.2. Powder
- 11. Bio-based Coatings Market, by Application
- 11.1. Adhesive & Sealant
- 11.2. Clear Coat
- 11.3. Primer
- 11.4. Topcoat
- 12. Bio-based Coatings Market, by End Use Industry
- 12.1. Automotive & Transportation
- 12.2. Buildings & Construction
- 12.3. General Industrial
- 12.4. Marine
- 12.5. Packaging
- 12.6. Wood & Furniture
- 13. Bio-based Coatings Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Bio-based Coatings Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Bio-based Coatings Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. AkzoNobel N.V.
- 16.3.2. Arkema S.A.
- 16.3.3. Axalta Coating Systems, LLC
- 16.3.4. BASF SE
- 16.3.5. Benjamin Moore & Co.
- 16.3.6. Cargill Incorporated
- 16.3.7. Chenyang Group
- 16.3.8. Ciranova by Blanchon Group
- 16.3.9. Copperant-Het Y Coatings B.V.
- 16.3.10. Cortec Corporation
- 16.3.11. Covestro AG
- 16.3.12. Eco Safety Products
- 16.3.13. Genomatica, Inc.
- 16.3.14. ICA SpA
- 16.3.15. Industrias Quimicas Masquelack S.A.
- 16.3.16. Jotun A/S
- 16.3.17. Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.18. Nippon Paint Holdings Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.19. PPG Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.20. Sherwin-Williams Company
- 16.3.21. Stahl Holdings B.V.
- 16.3.22. Stora Enso Oyj
- 16.3.23. The Dow Chemical Company
- 16.3.24. Tremco CPG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
