Bio-Alcohols Market by Product Type (Biobutanol, Bioethanol, Biojet Fuel), Feedstock (Cellulosic Biomass, Corn, Starch), Technology, Application, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Bio-Alcohols Market was valued at USD 10.60 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 11.33 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.59%, reaching USD 19.04 billion by 2032.
An incisive introduction to how technological advances regulatory pressure and sustainability priorities are redefining the strategic importance of bio-derived alcohols
The bio-alcohols landscape is reshaping energy and chemical value chains as sustainability and decarbonization imperatives converge with technological progress. Advances in fermentation processes, catalytic pathways, and feedstock utilization have expanded the practical scope of biobutanol, bioethanol, biojet fuel, and biomethanol beyond niche applications into mainstream industrial and transportation roles. Regulatory momentum aimed at reducing lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, alongside corporate net-zero commitments, continues to elevate the strategic priority of bio-derived alcohols for corporate procurement and national energy planning.
Transitioning from fossil-derived molecules to bio-based alternatives introduces complex cross-sector dynamics. Feedstock sourcing strategies, supply chain resilience, and conversion pathway efficiencies all influence relative competitiveness. As stakeholders evaluate lower-carbon fuel options and renewable feedstocks, they must weigh trade-offs between land-use implications, feedstock logistics, and end-use performance. In addition, evolving standards for fuel blending, aviation certifications for sustainable aviation fuel, and solvent specifications for industrial processes create new technical and commercial thresholds that innovation must meet. These developments are prompting companies to reassess capital allocation, partnerships, and policy engagement to capture emerging opportunities.
How converging technology policy and demand-side changes are accelerating commercialization and reshaping investment priorities across bio-alcohol value chains
The industry is experiencing transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, policy realignment, and shifting end-use requirements that together are altering competitive dynamics. Fermentation and catalytic conversion platforms are becoming more efficient and flexible, enabling a broader array of feedstocks to be processed with higher yields and lower energy intensity. This technical evolution reduces barriers to entry for novel players while enabling incumbent chemical and fuel producers to retrofit assets and diversify portfolios. Simultaneously, certification frameworks for sustainable fuels and solvent applications are pushing supply chains to document lifecycle performance, which in turn raises the bar for product traceability and verification.
Policy instruments and corporate procurement standards are reinforcing the commercial case for bio-alcohols. Incentives, blending mandates, and procurement commitments for low-carbon fuels and chemicals are changing demand patterns across automotive, aviation, marine, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical applications. Consequently, companies are shifting from pilots and demonstrations to scaled deployments, prioritizing feedstock security and offtake agreements. These converging forces are also altering investment rhythms: capital is moving toward projects that combine technology resilience with scalable feedstock strategies and robust offtake structures, while collaborative models and consortium-based investments are becoming more common to share risk and accelerate commercialization.
Assessing how changes in United States tariff policy in 2025 are likely to reconfigure trade flows procurement strategies and competitive positioning in the bio-alcohol sector
United States tariff policies in 2025 will influence trade flows, feedstock sourcing choices, and competitive positioning for manufacturers and traders operating across global bio-alcohol networks. Tariff adjustments can alter relative economics between domestically produced and imported products, prompting buyers to reassess supplier mixes and long-term procurement strategies. In response to elevated trade costs, vertically integrated players may prioritize onshore feedstock processing and downstream conversion to retain margin and ensure supply reliability, while import-reliant firms may accelerate hedging strategies or seek tariff relief mechanisms where possible.
Beyond direct price impacts, tariff shifts can stimulate secondary effects such as changes in logistics patterns, warehouse footprint optimization, and renegotiation of supply contracts to incorporate tariff contingencies. Firms will need enhanced tariff modeling capabilities and agile commercial playbooks to respond to rapid policy changes. At the same time, diplomatic and multilateral trade dialogues will matter more for stakeholders seeking predictable market access. Consequently, market participants should increase engagement with trade associations and policy advisors to anticipate regulatory movements and to identify opportunities for tariff mitigation or strategic realignment that preserve access to critical feedstocks and end markets.
Deep segmentation-driven insights that reveal where product feedstock and technology align with end-use demands to create resilient commercial advantages
Segmentation analysis exposes where value creation and technical differentiation are emerging across product, application, feedstock, technology, and end-use vectors. Product-type differentiation captures a spectrum from biobutanol and biomethanol to bioethanol and biojet fuel, with bioethanol further divided into fuel grade and industrial grade, each meeting distinct specification and regulatory requirements. Application segmentation distinguishes chemical intermediate roles from fuel and solvent uses, where fuel applications branch into automotive fuel, aviation fuel, and marine fuel and require tailored performance characteristics and certification pathways.
Feedstock segmentation highlights the strategic importance of cellulosic biomass, corn, starch, and sugarcane; within cellulosic options, agricultural residue and forestry residue present differing collection logistics and carbon profile considerations that affect conversion pathway choices. Technology segmentation clarifies competitive positioning among catalytic conversion, fermentation, and gasification platforms, where capital intensity, scalability, and feedstock flexibility determine suitability for specific feedstocks and end uses. End-use industry segmentation underscores the cross-sector relevance of bio-alcohols across automotive, aviation, cosmetics, marine, and pharmaceuticals, each bringing unique quality, regulatory, and supply chain constraints. Integrating these segmentation axes reveals where margin pools concentrate, where technical innovation can unlock new demand, and where alignment between feedstock availability and conversion capability creates the most resilient commercial propositions.
Regional dynamics and infrastructure realities in the Americas Europe Middle East and Africa and Asia-Pacific that determine where bio-alcohol initiatives will scale most effectively
Regional dynamics shape the strategic calculus for producers, buyers, and investors, with each geography presenting distinct regulatory regimes, feedstock endowments, and infrastructure profiles. In the Americas, policymakers and private-sector actors are advancing low-carbon fuel mandates and incentive programs while leveraging extensive agricultural residues and corn infrastructures to support both fuel-grade and industrial bioethanol and to scale conversion technologies closer to feedstock sources. This creates opportunities for vertically integrated models and for partnerships that align agricultural supply chains with conversion capacity.
In Europe, Middle East and Africa, regulatory rigor around lifecycle emissions, coupled with a growing emphasis on sustainable aviation fuel pathways, is accelerating demand for certified low-carbon alternatives and for feedstock transparency. Infrastructure constraints and feedstock variability across the region mean that project design must balance centralized conversion capacity with distributed sourcing. Asia-Pacific presents heterogenous markets where sugarcane- and starch-based feedstocks coexist with rapidly developing cellulosic initiatives; strong downstream demand from automotive and marine sectors, combined with large-scale industrial supply chains, encourages both domestic scaling and strategic import relationships to meet quality and volume requirements.
Key company-level strategies and collaborative models that are defining competitive advantage through technology ownership feedstock integration and verified sustainability credentials
Corporate strategies among leading players reflect a mix of technology specialization, integrated feedstock strategies, and offtake-driven commercialization models. Some companies focus on developing proprietary catalytic or fermentation platforms, seeking efficiency gains and patent-protected advantages that underpin premium positioning in high-value chemical intermediate and specialty solvent markets. Others pursue vertically integrated approaches, securing feedstock supplies through agricultural partnerships or by co-locating conversion assets near high-density residues to lower logistics costs and improve lifecycle footprints.
Strategic collaboration has become a recurrent theme, with alliances between technology developers, energy companies, aviation partners, and chemical manufacturers enabling faster route-to-market for sustainable aviation fuel and advanced bio-alcohol products. Investors and corporate procurers increasingly evaluate partners on demonstrated feedstock traceability, certification readiness, and the ability to deliver consistent product quality at scale. As a result, firms that combine technical credibility with robust commercial contracting and clear sustainability documentation gain preferential access to strategic offtake and financing, creating a virtuous cycle of investment and market trust.
Actionable recommendations for executives to align technology feedstock commercial and policy strategies in order to accelerate adoption and mitigate execution risk
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of actionable moves to capture near-term opportunities while building resilience for longer-term transitions. First, companies need to align R&D and capital deployment toward conversion platforms that demonstrate feedstock flexibility and favorable lifecycle performance, focusing on modular designs and retrofit pathways that reduce execution risk. Second, firms should secure diversified feedstock contracts that balance availability with sustainability criteria, incorporating agricultural residue and forestry residue options alongside traditional corn, starch, and sugarcane sources to hedge supply disruption and policy shifts.
Third, commercial teams must structure offtake agreements to include quality specifications and tariff contingency clauses while pursuing strategic partnerships across automotive, aviation, marine, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical segments to anchor demand. Fourth, organizations should invest in traceability systems and verification protocols to meet evolving certification standards and to enhance access to incentive programs. Finally, executives should engage proactively with policymakers and industry consortia to shape workable certification frameworks, trade arrangements, and incentive designs that enable scalable, low-carbon deployments while protecting investment returns.
A transparent mixed-methods approach combining expert interviews technical synthesis supply chain validation and scenario-driven policy analysis to underpin the findings
The research methodology integrates primary interviews, technical literature review, and supply chain validation to produce robust qualitative insights. Primary interviews include conversations with technology providers, feedstock aggregators, end-use buyers, and regulatory stakeholders to capture on-the-ground perspectives on technology readiness, contractual norms, and certification challenges. These interviews are complemented by a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications, standards documentation, and patent filings to triangulate claims about conversion efficiencies and process innovations.
Supply chain validation involves mapping feedstock logistics, conversion footprints, and downstream distribution channels to understand bottlenecks and cost drivers. The methodology also employs scenario-based policy analysis to interpret how tariff changes, incentive mechanisms, and certification regimes could alter commercial priorities, using sensitivity checks and expert elicitation to ensure conclusions remain grounded in practical constraints. Throughout, transparency about assumptions and the inclusion of methodological appendices enable readers to assess how qualitative judgments were reached and to replicate key analytical steps where necessary.
A concise conclusion emphasizing the critical role of integrated feedstock technology and certification strategies in determining which bio-alcohol value chains will scale successfully
In sum, the bio-alcohols landscape is moving from demonstration toward strategic scaling as technological improvements, regulatory drivers, and evolving end-use demand coalesce. The interplay between feedstock availability, conversion technology choice, and certification requirements will determine which value chains achieve resilient commercial scale. Market participants that integrate technical capability with secure feedstock arrangements, credible sustainability documentation, and adaptive commercial contracts will be best positioned to capture emerging opportunities across fuel and industrial segments.
As stakeholders navigate tariff shifts, regional infrastructure constraints, and certification complexities, success will depend on proactive risk management, collaborative partnerships, and targeted investments in modular, feedstock-flexible technologies. By focusing resources on areas where feedstock and technology advantages align with high-value end-use demand, companies can accelerate deployment while preserving optionality for future pathways.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An incisive introduction to how technological advances regulatory pressure and sustainability priorities are redefining the strategic importance of bio-derived alcohols
The bio-alcohols landscape is reshaping energy and chemical value chains as sustainability and decarbonization imperatives converge with technological progress. Advances in fermentation processes, catalytic pathways, and feedstock utilization have expanded the practical scope of biobutanol, bioethanol, biojet fuel, and biomethanol beyond niche applications into mainstream industrial and transportation roles. Regulatory momentum aimed at reducing lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, alongside corporate net-zero commitments, continues to elevate the strategic priority of bio-derived alcohols for corporate procurement and national energy planning.
Transitioning from fossil-derived molecules to bio-based alternatives introduces complex cross-sector dynamics. Feedstock sourcing strategies, supply chain resilience, and conversion pathway efficiencies all influence relative competitiveness. As stakeholders evaluate lower-carbon fuel options and renewable feedstocks, they must weigh trade-offs between land-use implications, feedstock logistics, and end-use performance. In addition, evolving standards for fuel blending, aviation certifications for sustainable aviation fuel, and solvent specifications for industrial processes create new technical and commercial thresholds that innovation must meet. These developments are prompting companies to reassess capital allocation, partnerships, and policy engagement to capture emerging opportunities.
How converging technology policy and demand-side changes are accelerating commercialization and reshaping investment priorities across bio-alcohol value chains
The industry is experiencing transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, policy realignment, and shifting end-use requirements that together are altering competitive dynamics. Fermentation and catalytic conversion platforms are becoming more efficient and flexible, enabling a broader array of feedstocks to be processed with higher yields and lower energy intensity. This technical evolution reduces barriers to entry for novel players while enabling incumbent chemical and fuel producers to retrofit assets and diversify portfolios. Simultaneously, certification frameworks for sustainable fuels and solvent applications are pushing supply chains to document lifecycle performance, which in turn raises the bar for product traceability and verification.
Policy instruments and corporate procurement standards are reinforcing the commercial case for bio-alcohols. Incentives, blending mandates, and procurement commitments for low-carbon fuels and chemicals are changing demand patterns across automotive, aviation, marine, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical applications. Consequently, companies are shifting from pilots and demonstrations to scaled deployments, prioritizing feedstock security and offtake agreements. These converging forces are also altering investment rhythms: capital is moving toward projects that combine technology resilience with scalable feedstock strategies and robust offtake structures, while collaborative models and consortium-based investments are becoming more common to share risk and accelerate commercialization.
Assessing how changes in United States tariff policy in 2025 are likely to reconfigure trade flows procurement strategies and competitive positioning in the bio-alcohol sector
United States tariff policies in 2025 will influence trade flows, feedstock sourcing choices, and competitive positioning for manufacturers and traders operating across global bio-alcohol networks. Tariff adjustments can alter relative economics between domestically produced and imported products, prompting buyers to reassess supplier mixes and long-term procurement strategies. In response to elevated trade costs, vertically integrated players may prioritize onshore feedstock processing and downstream conversion to retain margin and ensure supply reliability, while import-reliant firms may accelerate hedging strategies or seek tariff relief mechanisms where possible.
Beyond direct price impacts, tariff shifts can stimulate secondary effects such as changes in logistics patterns, warehouse footprint optimization, and renegotiation of supply contracts to incorporate tariff contingencies. Firms will need enhanced tariff modeling capabilities and agile commercial playbooks to respond to rapid policy changes. At the same time, diplomatic and multilateral trade dialogues will matter more for stakeholders seeking predictable market access. Consequently, market participants should increase engagement with trade associations and policy advisors to anticipate regulatory movements and to identify opportunities for tariff mitigation or strategic realignment that preserve access to critical feedstocks and end markets.
Deep segmentation-driven insights that reveal where product feedstock and technology align with end-use demands to create resilient commercial advantages
Segmentation analysis exposes where value creation and technical differentiation are emerging across product, application, feedstock, technology, and end-use vectors. Product-type differentiation captures a spectrum from biobutanol and biomethanol to bioethanol and biojet fuel, with bioethanol further divided into fuel grade and industrial grade, each meeting distinct specification and regulatory requirements. Application segmentation distinguishes chemical intermediate roles from fuel and solvent uses, where fuel applications branch into automotive fuel, aviation fuel, and marine fuel and require tailored performance characteristics and certification pathways.
Feedstock segmentation highlights the strategic importance of cellulosic biomass, corn, starch, and sugarcane; within cellulosic options, agricultural residue and forestry residue present differing collection logistics and carbon profile considerations that affect conversion pathway choices. Technology segmentation clarifies competitive positioning among catalytic conversion, fermentation, and gasification platforms, where capital intensity, scalability, and feedstock flexibility determine suitability for specific feedstocks and end uses. End-use industry segmentation underscores the cross-sector relevance of bio-alcohols across automotive, aviation, cosmetics, marine, and pharmaceuticals, each bringing unique quality, regulatory, and supply chain constraints. Integrating these segmentation axes reveals where margin pools concentrate, where technical innovation can unlock new demand, and where alignment between feedstock availability and conversion capability creates the most resilient commercial propositions.
Regional dynamics and infrastructure realities in the Americas Europe Middle East and Africa and Asia-Pacific that determine where bio-alcohol initiatives will scale most effectively
Regional dynamics shape the strategic calculus for producers, buyers, and investors, with each geography presenting distinct regulatory regimes, feedstock endowments, and infrastructure profiles. In the Americas, policymakers and private-sector actors are advancing low-carbon fuel mandates and incentive programs while leveraging extensive agricultural residues and corn infrastructures to support both fuel-grade and industrial bioethanol and to scale conversion technologies closer to feedstock sources. This creates opportunities for vertically integrated models and for partnerships that align agricultural supply chains with conversion capacity.
In Europe, Middle East and Africa, regulatory rigor around lifecycle emissions, coupled with a growing emphasis on sustainable aviation fuel pathways, is accelerating demand for certified low-carbon alternatives and for feedstock transparency. Infrastructure constraints and feedstock variability across the region mean that project design must balance centralized conversion capacity with distributed sourcing. Asia-Pacific presents heterogenous markets where sugarcane- and starch-based feedstocks coexist with rapidly developing cellulosic initiatives; strong downstream demand from automotive and marine sectors, combined with large-scale industrial supply chains, encourages both domestic scaling and strategic import relationships to meet quality and volume requirements.
Key company-level strategies and collaborative models that are defining competitive advantage through technology ownership feedstock integration and verified sustainability credentials
Corporate strategies among leading players reflect a mix of technology specialization, integrated feedstock strategies, and offtake-driven commercialization models. Some companies focus on developing proprietary catalytic or fermentation platforms, seeking efficiency gains and patent-protected advantages that underpin premium positioning in high-value chemical intermediate and specialty solvent markets. Others pursue vertically integrated approaches, securing feedstock supplies through agricultural partnerships or by co-locating conversion assets near high-density residues to lower logistics costs and improve lifecycle footprints.
Strategic collaboration has become a recurrent theme, with alliances between technology developers, energy companies, aviation partners, and chemical manufacturers enabling faster route-to-market for sustainable aviation fuel and advanced bio-alcohol products. Investors and corporate procurers increasingly evaluate partners on demonstrated feedstock traceability, certification readiness, and the ability to deliver consistent product quality at scale. As a result, firms that combine technical credibility with robust commercial contracting and clear sustainability documentation gain preferential access to strategic offtake and financing, creating a virtuous cycle of investment and market trust.
Actionable recommendations for executives to align technology feedstock commercial and policy strategies in order to accelerate adoption and mitigate execution risk
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of actionable moves to capture near-term opportunities while building resilience for longer-term transitions. First, companies need to align R&D and capital deployment toward conversion platforms that demonstrate feedstock flexibility and favorable lifecycle performance, focusing on modular designs and retrofit pathways that reduce execution risk. Second, firms should secure diversified feedstock contracts that balance availability with sustainability criteria, incorporating agricultural residue and forestry residue options alongside traditional corn, starch, and sugarcane sources to hedge supply disruption and policy shifts.
Third, commercial teams must structure offtake agreements to include quality specifications and tariff contingency clauses while pursuing strategic partnerships across automotive, aviation, marine, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical segments to anchor demand. Fourth, organizations should invest in traceability systems and verification protocols to meet evolving certification standards and to enhance access to incentive programs. Finally, executives should engage proactively with policymakers and industry consortia to shape workable certification frameworks, trade arrangements, and incentive designs that enable scalable, low-carbon deployments while protecting investment returns.
A transparent mixed-methods approach combining expert interviews technical synthesis supply chain validation and scenario-driven policy analysis to underpin the findings
The research methodology integrates primary interviews, technical literature review, and supply chain validation to produce robust qualitative insights. Primary interviews include conversations with technology providers, feedstock aggregators, end-use buyers, and regulatory stakeholders to capture on-the-ground perspectives on technology readiness, contractual norms, and certification challenges. These interviews are complemented by a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications, standards documentation, and patent filings to triangulate claims about conversion efficiencies and process innovations.
Supply chain validation involves mapping feedstock logistics, conversion footprints, and downstream distribution channels to understand bottlenecks and cost drivers. The methodology also employs scenario-based policy analysis to interpret how tariff changes, incentive mechanisms, and certification regimes could alter commercial priorities, using sensitivity checks and expert elicitation to ensure conclusions remain grounded in practical constraints. Throughout, transparency about assumptions and the inclusion of methodological appendices enable readers to assess how qualitative judgments were reached and to replicate key analytical steps where necessary.
A concise conclusion emphasizing the critical role of integrated feedstock technology and certification strategies in determining which bio-alcohol value chains will scale successfully
In sum, the bio-alcohols landscape is moving from demonstration toward strategic scaling as technological improvements, regulatory drivers, and evolving end-use demand coalesce. The interplay between feedstock availability, conversion technology choice, and certification requirements will determine which value chains achieve resilient commercial scale. Market participants that integrate technical capability with secure feedstock arrangements, credible sustainability documentation, and adaptive commercial contracts will be best positioned to capture emerging opportunities across fuel and industrial segments.
As stakeholders navigate tariff shifts, regional infrastructure constraints, and certification complexities, success will depend on proactive risk management, collaborative partnerships, and targeted investments in modular, feedstock-flexible technologies. By focusing resources on areas where feedstock and technology advantages align with high-value end-use demand, companies can accelerate deployment while preserving optionality for future pathways.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
198 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Expansion of cellulosic bio-alcohol facilities leveraging agricultural waste for sustainable fuel production
- 5.2. Adoption of advanced enzymatic hydrolysis processes to improve yield in second generation bio-alcohol manufacturing
- 5.3. Integration of renewable biomass co-feedstocks to optimize bio-alcohol output and reduce carbon intensity metrics
- 5.4. Emergence of genetically engineered yeast strains to boost fermentation efficiency and product specificity
- 5.5. Development of on-site carbon capture systems in bio-alcohol plants to achieve net zero emission targets
- 5.6. Strategic partnerships between bio-alcohol producers and automotive companies for high performance fuel blends
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Bio-Alcohols Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Biobutanol
- 8.2. Bioethanol
- 8.2.1. Fuel Grade
- 8.2.2. Industrial Grade
- 8.3. Biojet Fuel
- 8.4. Biomethanol
- 9. Bio-Alcohols Market, by Feedstock
- 9.1. Cellulosic Biomass
- 9.1.1. Agricultural Residue
- 9.1.2. Forestry Residue
- 9.2. Corn
- 9.3. Starch
- 9.4. Sugarcane
- 10. Bio-Alcohols Market, by Technology
- 10.1. Catalytic Conversion
- 10.2. Fermentation
- 10.3. Gasification
- 11. Bio-Alcohols Market, by Application
- 11.1. Chemical Intermediate
- 11.2. Fuel
- 11.2.1. Automotive Fuel
- 11.2.2. Aviation Fuel
- 11.2.3. Marine Fuel
- 11.3. Solvent
- 12. Bio-Alcohols Market, by End Use Industry
- 12.1. Automotive
- 12.2. Aviation
- 12.3. Cosmetics
- 12.4. Marine
- 12.5. Pharmaceuticals
- 13. Bio-Alcohols Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Bio-Alcohols Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Bio-Alcohols Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Abengoa S.A.
- 16.3.2. Algenol Biofuels
- 16.3.3. Arkema SA
- 16.3.4. BASF SE
- 16.3.5. BP International Limited
- 16.3.6. Braskem
- 16.3.7. Cargill Inc.
- 16.3.8. Clariant AG
- 16.3.9. CREMER OLEO GmbH & Co. KG
- 16.3.10. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 16.3.11. EnviTec Biogas AG
- 16.3.12. ETIP-B-SABS
- 16.3.13. Fulcrum BioEnergy Inc.
- 16.3.14. Genomatica, Inc.
- 16.3.15. Gevo, Inc.
- 16.3.16. Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc.
- 16.3.17. Godavari Biorefineries Ltd.
- 16.3.18. Koninklijke DSM N.V.
- 16.3.19. Mascoma LLC
- 16.3.20. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
- 16.3.21. Prax Group
- 16.3.22. Raizen S.A.
- 16.3.23. Red Rock BioFuels
- 16.3.24. Valero Energy Corporation
- 16.3.25. VERBIO Vereinigte BioEnergie AG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
