Beer Packaging Market by Packaging Type (Bottles, Cans, Draught), Material (Aluminum, Glass, Plastic), Package Size, Closure Type - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Beer Packaging Market was valued at USD 56.59 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 60.59 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.74%, reaching USD 95.40 billion by 2032.
A clear and authoritative overview of how evolving consumer expectations and operational realities are reshaping strategic packaging decisions in the beer industry
The beer packaging landscape is undergoing a period of strategic reinvention driven by consumer preference shifts, sustainability commitments, and rapid innovation in materials and formats. As consumer expectations evolve, brand owners and packagers are rethinking how packaging contributes to product differentiation, shelf appeal, and lifecycle costs. Packaging decisions now intersect with marketing imperatives, regulatory considerations, and operational realities in ways that require coordinated cross-functional responses.
This introductory analysis frames the principal dynamics shaping contemporary packaging strategy for beer producers. It highlights the interplay between design, functionality, and supply chain resilience while emphasizing the importance of aligning packaging choices with broader corporate objectives. By focusing on tangible factors such as material characteristics, closure types, and package formats, this section prepares the reader for deeper exploration of transformation drivers and practical implications addressed in subsequent sections.
How sustainability mandates, e-commerce growth, and digital innovations are collectively reconfiguring packaging priorities and operational models across the beer sector
The beer packaging sector is experiencing transformative shifts that extend well beyond cosmetic changes, as sustainability, convenience, and omnichannel retailing converge to redefine value creation. Advances in material science are enabling lighter, more recyclable formats, and these technical gains are being matched by marketing strategies that use packaging as a credibility signal for environmental commitments. Meanwhile, the acceleration of e-commerce and direct-to-consumer distribution has elevated the importance of transit resilience and unboxing experience, which in turn influences format selection and protective design.
Concurrently, regulatory landscapes and extended producer responsibility initiatives are prompting firms to reassess end-of-life pathways for packaging, driving investment into circular systems and recycled-content sourcing. Technology is also playing an enabling role: digital printing, smart labeling, and traceability solutions provide new routes for personalization and supply chain transparency. Taken together, these shifts are prompting both gradual incrementalism in incumbent portfolios and bold experimentation among agile brewers and packaging innovators.
Assessment of how tariff changes are reshaping sourcing decisions, procurement resilience, and packaging design priorities across the beer supply chain
Policy changes in 2025 related to tariffs and trade measures have created a complex set of cumulative impacts across materials sourcing, manufacturing schedules, and procurement strategies for beverage packagers. Tariff adjustments on key inputs such as aluminum and certain specialty glass can raise landed costs and encourage buyers to reconsider supplier geographies, contractual terms, and inventory buffering strategies. In response, organizations are increasingly diversifying supplier bases, accelerating qualification of regional suppliers, and reassessing make-versus-buy decisions to preserve continuity and cost competitiveness.
Beyond direct cost implications, tariffs amplify supply chain volatility, prompting firms to invest in scenario planning and to seek longer-term agreements or price pass-through mechanisms. The effect on packaging design choices is also notable: higher input costs can incentivize light-weighting, substitution between materials, or shifts to formats that minimize raw material intensity. Ultimately, the cumulative effect of tariffs is to heighten the premium on operational agility and to prioritize strategies that insulate the value chain from trade-induced perturbations while preserving brand integrity.
Comprehensive segmentation-driven perspective explaining how packaging type, material subcategories, size tiers, and closure choices determine strategic priorities and trade-offs
A nuanced segmentation framework illuminates where commercial opportunities and operational trade-offs are most pronounced, enabling more focused strategy development for packagers and brewers. Based on Packaging Type, market is studied across Bottles, Cans, Draught, and Kegs, and each format carries distinct implications for branding, distribution, and refillability. Bottles remain a staple for heritage positioning and on-premise presentation, cans excel for portability and barrier performance, draught enables on-tap freshness for the hospitality channel, and kegs continue to serve large-format dispensing needs with economies of scale.
Based on Material, market is studied across Aluminum, Glass, and Plastic. The Aluminum is further studied across Slim and Standard. The Glass is further studied across Amber and Clear. The Plastic is further studied across Hdpe and Pet. Material choices influence recyclability, weight, and barrier properties, and the subdivisions within each material category reflect divergent performance and consumer perception trade-offs. Based on Package Size, market is studied across 331 To 500 Ml, 501 To 750 Ml, Above 750 Ml, and Up To 330 Ml, and these size tiers correspond to consumption occasions, price positioning, and channel preferences. Finally, based on Closure Type, market is studied across Crown Cap, Pull Tab, and Screw Cap, and closure selection affects resealability, dispensing behavior, and production line complexity. Together, these segmentation lenses provide a structured way to evaluate product-market fit and to prioritize investments where both consumer demand and operational feasibility intersect.
Regionally differentiated strategic imperatives highlighting how distinct regulatory, logistical, and consumer dynamics influence packaging strategies across global beer markets
Regional dynamics vary materially and shape both sourcing strategies and product positioning, so an integrated geographic perspective is essential for global brands and regional players alike. Americas exhibit a combination of mature consumption patterns, strong craft and premium segments, and significant investment in packaging innovations that enhance convenience and single-serve portability. The region's logistics infrastructure and retailing evolution also create opportunities for format experimentation and private-label initiatives.
Europe, Middle East & Africa encompasses highly differentiated submarkets where regulatory frameworks, recycling infrastructure, and consumer environmental expectations exert varying degrees of influence on packaging design. In parts of Europe, extended producer responsibility schemes and high recycling rates incentivize recycled-content and refillable models, whereas other markets in the region are characterized by supply constraints or evolving retail channels. Asia-Pacific demonstrates rapid modernization of packaging ecosystems, with intense competition on price and functionality, a growing appetite for premiumization in certain urban centers, and significant investments in lightweighting and material substitution to address cost and logistics considerations. These regional contrasts underscore the importance of tailoring approaches to regulatory context, consumption occasions, and retailer requirements.
Insightful benchmarking of industry participants illustrating how sustainability leadership, production flexibility, and commercial alignment differentiate successful packaging strategies
Leading firms in the packaging ecosystem demonstrate a range of strategic behaviors that provide useful benchmarks for peers. Some companies are prioritizing integrated sustainability programs that combine recycled-content commitments, supply chain transparency, and investments in closed-loop systems to reduce dependency on virgin feedstocks. Others are focusing on manufacturing flexibility, upgrading lines to handle multiple formats and closure types to meet rapid SKU proliferation and omnichannel distribution demands.
Additionally, collaboration between brand owners and converters is becoming more sophisticated, with co-development projects around sleeve labeling, lightweight glass formulations, and aluminum alloy optimization. The competitive landscape is characterized less by single-innovation dominance and more by portfolios of incremental improvements across design, materials, and logistics. Firms that pair technical capability with strong commercial alignment-ensuring that packaging choices reinforce pricing strategy and channel mix-tend to navigate disruption more effectively than those pursuing isolated technological upgrades.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for leadership teams to build resilient sourcing, accelerate sustainable design, and align packaging with commercial imperatives
Industry leaders should adopt a proactive posture that balances near-term resilience with long-term transformation, prioritizing investments that yield operational flexibility and environmental benefit. Companies should begin by stress-testing supply chains against trade disruptions and material-specific shocks, using scenario planning to identify critical suppliers and to develop contingency sourcing or inventory approaches. Following this, organizations should accelerate material innovation pilots that target reduced material intensity and enhanced recyclability, and they should align these pilots with go-to-market tests to validate consumer acceptance.
Moreover, commercial teams must embed packaging considerations into portfolio and pricing decisions, ensuring that format and closure choices reinforce positioning while managing cost-to-serve. Cross-functional governance structures will be critical, enabling procurement, R&D, sustainability, and marketing to make coordinated trade-off decisions. Finally, leaders should pursue partnerships with collection and recycling stakeholders to secure feedstock access and to demonstrate credible end-of-life solutions, thereby strengthening brand trust and regulatory preparedness.
Transparent explanation of the mixed-methods research approach that combines interviews, secondary analysis, segmentation rigor, and scenario exploration to ensure actionable findings
This research is grounded in a mixed-methods approach that integrates qualitative interviews, primary stakeholder engagement, and secondary synthesis of publicly available regulatory and technical data. Primary inputs were gathered through structured discussions with packaging engineers, procurement leaders, and brand strategists, enabling triangulation of observed practices against stated priorities. Secondary analysis focused on material science developments, trade policy announcements, and documented changes in retail channel behavior to provide contextual depth.
Methodologically, the study employed a segmentation-first framework to ensure insights are actionable across packaging types, material subcategories, package sizes, and closure formats. Scenario analysis was used to explore the implications of policy shifts and supply chain disruptions, while comparative case reviews identified replicable tactics among early movers. Throughout, emphasis was placed on sourcing verifiable evidence and on framing implications in terms of strategic options rather than prescriptive solutions.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing integrated strategies across sustainability, sourcing, and production to transform packaging into a strategic competitive advantage
In conclusion, beer packaging is at the nexus of consumer desire, regulatory pressure, and operational constraint, making it a strategic lever for growth and differentiation. The interplay between material innovation, format suitability, and supply chain resilience will determine which companies can both meet evolving consumer expectations and protect margins under shifting trade conditions. Organizations that adopt an integrated approach-combining sustainability commitments, supplier diversification, and production flexibility-are best positioned to convert disruption into competitive advantage.
As the industry progresses, continuous learning will be essential: pilot programs, measured rollouts, and iterative design adjustments will enable firms to refine choices based on real-world performance. Ultimately, packaging decisions should be framed as strategic investments that influence brand perception, cost structure, and environmental footprint, and leaders must act decisively to align packaging direction with overall corporate strategy.
A clear and authoritative overview of how evolving consumer expectations and operational realities are reshaping strategic packaging decisions in the beer industry
The beer packaging landscape is undergoing a period of strategic reinvention driven by consumer preference shifts, sustainability commitments, and rapid innovation in materials and formats. As consumer expectations evolve, brand owners and packagers are rethinking how packaging contributes to product differentiation, shelf appeal, and lifecycle costs. Packaging decisions now intersect with marketing imperatives, regulatory considerations, and operational realities in ways that require coordinated cross-functional responses.
This introductory analysis frames the principal dynamics shaping contemporary packaging strategy for beer producers. It highlights the interplay between design, functionality, and supply chain resilience while emphasizing the importance of aligning packaging choices with broader corporate objectives. By focusing on tangible factors such as material characteristics, closure types, and package formats, this section prepares the reader for deeper exploration of transformation drivers and practical implications addressed in subsequent sections.
How sustainability mandates, e-commerce growth, and digital innovations are collectively reconfiguring packaging priorities and operational models across the beer sector
The beer packaging sector is experiencing transformative shifts that extend well beyond cosmetic changes, as sustainability, convenience, and omnichannel retailing converge to redefine value creation. Advances in material science are enabling lighter, more recyclable formats, and these technical gains are being matched by marketing strategies that use packaging as a credibility signal for environmental commitments. Meanwhile, the acceleration of e-commerce and direct-to-consumer distribution has elevated the importance of transit resilience and unboxing experience, which in turn influences format selection and protective design.
Concurrently, regulatory landscapes and extended producer responsibility initiatives are prompting firms to reassess end-of-life pathways for packaging, driving investment into circular systems and recycled-content sourcing. Technology is also playing an enabling role: digital printing, smart labeling, and traceability solutions provide new routes for personalization and supply chain transparency. Taken together, these shifts are prompting both gradual incrementalism in incumbent portfolios and bold experimentation among agile brewers and packaging innovators.
Assessment of how tariff changes are reshaping sourcing decisions, procurement resilience, and packaging design priorities across the beer supply chain
Policy changes in 2025 related to tariffs and trade measures have created a complex set of cumulative impacts across materials sourcing, manufacturing schedules, and procurement strategies for beverage packagers. Tariff adjustments on key inputs such as aluminum and certain specialty glass can raise landed costs and encourage buyers to reconsider supplier geographies, contractual terms, and inventory buffering strategies. In response, organizations are increasingly diversifying supplier bases, accelerating qualification of regional suppliers, and reassessing make-versus-buy decisions to preserve continuity and cost competitiveness.
Beyond direct cost implications, tariffs amplify supply chain volatility, prompting firms to invest in scenario planning and to seek longer-term agreements or price pass-through mechanisms. The effect on packaging design choices is also notable: higher input costs can incentivize light-weighting, substitution between materials, or shifts to formats that minimize raw material intensity. Ultimately, the cumulative effect of tariffs is to heighten the premium on operational agility and to prioritize strategies that insulate the value chain from trade-induced perturbations while preserving brand integrity.
Comprehensive segmentation-driven perspective explaining how packaging type, material subcategories, size tiers, and closure choices determine strategic priorities and trade-offs
A nuanced segmentation framework illuminates where commercial opportunities and operational trade-offs are most pronounced, enabling more focused strategy development for packagers and brewers. Based on Packaging Type, market is studied across Bottles, Cans, Draught, and Kegs, and each format carries distinct implications for branding, distribution, and refillability. Bottles remain a staple for heritage positioning and on-premise presentation, cans excel for portability and barrier performance, draught enables on-tap freshness for the hospitality channel, and kegs continue to serve large-format dispensing needs with economies of scale.
Based on Material, market is studied across Aluminum, Glass, and Plastic. The Aluminum is further studied across Slim and Standard. The Glass is further studied across Amber and Clear. The Plastic is further studied across Hdpe and Pet. Material choices influence recyclability, weight, and barrier properties, and the subdivisions within each material category reflect divergent performance and consumer perception trade-offs. Based on Package Size, market is studied across 331 To 500 Ml, 501 To 750 Ml, Above 750 Ml, and Up To 330 Ml, and these size tiers correspond to consumption occasions, price positioning, and channel preferences. Finally, based on Closure Type, market is studied across Crown Cap, Pull Tab, and Screw Cap, and closure selection affects resealability, dispensing behavior, and production line complexity. Together, these segmentation lenses provide a structured way to evaluate product-market fit and to prioritize investments where both consumer demand and operational feasibility intersect.
Regionally differentiated strategic imperatives highlighting how distinct regulatory, logistical, and consumer dynamics influence packaging strategies across global beer markets
Regional dynamics vary materially and shape both sourcing strategies and product positioning, so an integrated geographic perspective is essential for global brands and regional players alike. Americas exhibit a combination of mature consumption patterns, strong craft and premium segments, and significant investment in packaging innovations that enhance convenience and single-serve portability. The region's logistics infrastructure and retailing evolution also create opportunities for format experimentation and private-label initiatives.
Europe, Middle East & Africa encompasses highly differentiated submarkets where regulatory frameworks, recycling infrastructure, and consumer environmental expectations exert varying degrees of influence on packaging design. In parts of Europe, extended producer responsibility schemes and high recycling rates incentivize recycled-content and refillable models, whereas other markets in the region are characterized by supply constraints or evolving retail channels. Asia-Pacific demonstrates rapid modernization of packaging ecosystems, with intense competition on price and functionality, a growing appetite for premiumization in certain urban centers, and significant investments in lightweighting and material substitution to address cost and logistics considerations. These regional contrasts underscore the importance of tailoring approaches to regulatory context, consumption occasions, and retailer requirements.
Insightful benchmarking of industry participants illustrating how sustainability leadership, production flexibility, and commercial alignment differentiate successful packaging strategies
Leading firms in the packaging ecosystem demonstrate a range of strategic behaviors that provide useful benchmarks for peers. Some companies are prioritizing integrated sustainability programs that combine recycled-content commitments, supply chain transparency, and investments in closed-loop systems to reduce dependency on virgin feedstocks. Others are focusing on manufacturing flexibility, upgrading lines to handle multiple formats and closure types to meet rapid SKU proliferation and omnichannel distribution demands.
Additionally, collaboration between brand owners and converters is becoming more sophisticated, with co-development projects around sleeve labeling, lightweight glass formulations, and aluminum alloy optimization. The competitive landscape is characterized less by single-innovation dominance and more by portfolios of incremental improvements across design, materials, and logistics. Firms that pair technical capability with strong commercial alignment-ensuring that packaging choices reinforce pricing strategy and channel mix-tend to navigate disruption more effectively than those pursuing isolated technological upgrades.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for leadership teams to build resilient sourcing, accelerate sustainable design, and align packaging with commercial imperatives
Industry leaders should adopt a proactive posture that balances near-term resilience with long-term transformation, prioritizing investments that yield operational flexibility and environmental benefit. Companies should begin by stress-testing supply chains against trade disruptions and material-specific shocks, using scenario planning to identify critical suppliers and to develop contingency sourcing or inventory approaches. Following this, organizations should accelerate material innovation pilots that target reduced material intensity and enhanced recyclability, and they should align these pilots with go-to-market tests to validate consumer acceptance.
Moreover, commercial teams must embed packaging considerations into portfolio and pricing decisions, ensuring that format and closure choices reinforce positioning while managing cost-to-serve. Cross-functional governance structures will be critical, enabling procurement, R&D, sustainability, and marketing to make coordinated trade-off decisions. Finally, leaders should pursue partnerships with collection and recycling stakeholders to secure feedstock access and to demonstrate credible end-of-life solutions, thereby strengthening brand trust and regulatory preparedness.
Transparent explanation of the mixed-methods research approach that combines interviews, secondary analysis, segmentation rigor, and scenario exploration to ensure actionable findings
This research is grounded in a mixed-methods approach that integrates qualitative interviews, primary stakeholder engagement, and secondary synthesis of publicly available regulatory and technical data. Primary inputs were gathered through structured discussions with packaging engineers, procurement leaders, and brand strategists, enabling triangulation of observed practices against stated priorities. Secondary analysis focused on material science developments, trade policy announcements, and documented changes in retail channel behavior to provide contextual depth.
Methodologically, the study employed a segmentation-first framework to ensure insights are actionable across packaging types, material subcategories, package sizes, and closure formats. Scenario analysis was used to explore the implications of policy shifts and supply chain disruptions, while comparative case reviews identified replicable tactics among early movers. Throughout, emphasis was placed on sourcing verifiable evidence and on framing implications in terms of strategic options rather than prescriptive solutions.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing integrated strategies across sustainability, sourcing, and production to transform packaging into a strategic competitive advantage
In conclusion, beer packaging is at the nexus of consumer desire, regulatory pressure, and operational constraint, making it a strategic lever for growth and differentiation. The interplay between material innovation, format suitability, and supply chain resilience will determine which companies can both meet evolving consumer expectations and protect margins under shifting trade conditions. Organizations that adopt an integrated approach-combining sustainability commitments, supplier diversification, and production flexibility-are best positioned to convert disruption into competitive advantage.
As the industry progresses, continuous learning will be essential: pilot programs, measured rollouts, and iterative design adjustments will enable firms to refine choices based on real-world performance. Ultimately, packaging decisions should be framed as strategic investments that influence brand perception, cost structure, and environmental footprint, and leaders must act decisively to align packaging direction with overall corporate strategy.
Table of Contents
191 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Beer Packaging Market, by Packaging Type
- 8.1. Bottles
- 8.2. Cans
- 8.3. Draught
- 8.4. Kegs
- 9. Beer Packaging Market, by Material
- 9.1. Aluminum
- 9.1.1. Slim
- 9.1.2. Standard
- 9.2. Glass
- 9.2.1. Amber
- 9.2.2. Clear
- 9.3. Plastic
- 9.3.1. Hdpe
- 9.3.2. Pet
- 10. Beer Packaging Market, by Package Size
- 10.1. 331 To 500 Ml
- 10.2. 501 To 750 Ml
- 10.3. Above 750 Ml
- 10.4. Up To 330 Ml
- 11. Beer Packaging Market, by Closure Type
- 11.1. Crown Cap
- 11.2. Pull Tab
- 11.3. Screw Cap
- 12. Beer Packaging Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Beer Packaging Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Beer Packaging Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. United States Beer Packaging Market
- 16. China Beer Packaging Market
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 17.5. Alpha Packaging
- 17.6. Amcor Plc
- 17.7. Ardagh Group S.A.
- 17.8. Avery Dennison Corporation
- 17.9. Ball Corporation
- 17.10. Berlin Packaging LLC
- 17.11. Berry Global Inc.
- 17.12. CCL Industries Inc.
- 17.13. Crown Holdings Inc.
- 17.14. DS Smith Plc
- 17.15. G3 Enterprises
- 17.16. Gerresheimer AG
- 17.17. Graphic Packaging Holding Company
- 17.18. International Paper Company
- 17.19. Krones AG
- 17.20. MULTIVAC Group
- 17.21. O-I Glass Inc.
- 17.22. Plastipak Holdings Inc.
- 17.23. SIG Combibloc Group AG
- 17.24. Silgan Holdings Inc.
- 17.25. Smurfit Kappa Group Plc
- 17.26. Tetra Pak International S.A.
- 17.27. TricorBraun Inc.
- 17.28. Vidrala S.A.
- 17.29. WestRock Company
- FIGURE 1. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 2. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
- FIGURE 3. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
- FIGURE 4. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 5. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 6. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGE SIZE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 7. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, BY CLOSURE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 8. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 9. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 10. GLOBAL BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 12. CHINA BEER PACKAGING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
