Barrier Shrink Films Market by Material (Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol, Polyethylene, Polypropylene), Packaging Type (Bundle Wrap, Collation Wrap, Label & Unit Load), Product, Application, End User Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Barrier Shrink Films Market was valued at USD 1.06 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1.23 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 17.52%, reaching USD 3.87 billion by 2032.
A strategic orientation to barrier shrink film fundamentals, functional trade-offs, and the commercial value drivers shaping specification choices across supply chains
Barrier shrink films sit at the intersection of materials science, packaging engineering, and evolving supply chain expectations. This report opens with a concise orientation to the technology and commercial drivers that shape how barrier films are specified, sourced, and deployed across end-use sectors. The introduction frames the material distinctions that influence barrier performance, machinability, and sustainability credentials, and explains why these factors matter to brand owners, converters, and packaging engineers alike.
Beyond technical definitions, the introduction highlights practical trade-offs between oxygen and moisture barrier, clarity and toughness, and the manufacturing modalities that enable high-throughput converting. It also situates barrier shrink films within broader packaging strategies such as shelf life extension, product protection in transit, and consumer-facing aesthetics. By establishing this foundation, the introduction ensures readers understand how materials, product types, applications, and commercial imperatives interrelate in shaping adoption and innovation.
How regulatory pressure, sustainability demands, manufacturing innovation, and evolving retail channels are collectively reshaping barrier shrink film design and sourcing
The landscape for barrier shrink films is undergoing rapid, transformative change driven by converging forces of regulation, consumer expectation, and technological progress. Sustainability mandates and extended producer responsibility schemes are accelerating the search for lower-carbon feedstocks, higher recycled-content formulations, and designs that enable circularity without compromising barrier integrity. At the same time, brands are demanding packaging that balances protection with shelf appeal, prompting innovations in film clarity, printability, and tactile finish that do not sacrifice gas and moisture barrier performance.
Concurrently, advancements in coextrusion, multilayer laminates, and nanocomposite additives are enabling thinner constructions that maintain barrier performance while reducing resin use and transport weight. E-commerce growth and omnichannel distribution patterns are reshaping mechanical performance requirements, with increased emphasis on puncture resistance and load stability. Digital printing and smarter label integration are loosening constraints on short-run customization, creating opportunities for regional converters to deliver differentiated solutions. Taken together, these shifts are redefining supplier value propositions and accelerating the reconfiguration of supply networks toward resilient, sustainability-aligned models.
The compounded supply chain, sourcing, capital, and cost management consequences of the United States tariff measures taking effect in 2025
The introduction of United States tariffs scheduled for 2025 has introduced significant strategic consequences across procurement, manufacturing footprint decisions, and supply chain timing. Firms that previously relied on certain international suppliers are reassessing total landed costs to account for tariff-driven input price variability, leading many to re-evaluate long-standing sourcing relationships and to accelerate nearshoring or dual-sourcing strategies to mitigate exposure. This recalibration affects not only resin procurement but also specialty additives and multilayer film laminates which often cross borders multiple times during conversion.
Tariff policy has a ripple effect on converter investment decisions, with some firms deferring capital projects in regions where cost pass-through is uncertain while others accelerate automation and efficiency projects to offset margin pressure. Brand owners face decisions between absorbing higher packaging costs and redesigning packaging to use less tariff-sensitive materials or domestically sourced resin streams. In parallel, increased tariff volatility heightens the value of flexible supply agreements and inventory management tactics such as strategic safety stocks and more dynamic freight routing. The overall consequence is a more defensive, diversification-oriented posture across the value chain that privileges agility, contractual flexibility, and supplier transparency.
Deep segmentation-driven insights that map material families, packaging formats, product types, application clusters, and end-user industry requirements to commercial priorities
Segmentation analysis reveals where technical needs and commercial priorities converge in barrier shrink film selection and application. Based on material, performance tiers vary across Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol, Polyethylene, Polypropylene, Polyvinyl Chloride, and Polyvinylidene Chloride, with Polyethylene further differentiated into HDPE, LDPE, and LLDPE variants to address distinct balance points between stiffness, clarity, and seal strength. Each material family presents its own processing windows and compatibility considerations for multilayer coextrusion and lamination.
Based on packaging type, design choices must juggle the mechanical demands of bundle wrap, collation wrap, label and unit load functions, pallet wrap, and sleeve wrap, while sleeve designs split into cold-shrink sleeve and heat-shrink sleeve processes that influence film composition and conversion equipment. Based on product, consumer and industrial requirements drive the choice between cling and non-cling films; cling films subdivide into hand wrap and machine wrap use cases, while non-cling options may be plain or printed depending on branding and traceability needs. Based on application, diverse end uses such as food packaging, industrial packaging, pharmaceutical packaging, and retail packaging impose bespoke barrier, clarity, and regulatory demands; food packaging itself breaks down into bakery and confectionery, dairy, fresh produce, and meat and poultry applications, each with particular shelf-life and safety requirements. Industrial packaging further organizes around bundle wrap, collation wrap, and pallet wrap needs, whereas pharmaceutical packaging emphasizes blister film and bottle wrap integrity and traceability. Based on end user industry, adoption patterns differ across automotive, consumer electronics, food and beverage, and pharmaceuticals, with the latter two driving especially stringent safety, hygiene, and regulatory documentation requirements.
Integrating these segmentation dimensions reveals where innovation and commercial opportunity intersect, and it clarifies which material and conversion pathways are most attractive for specific application clusters and downstream buyer requirements.
How regional regulatory priorities, manufacturing capacity centers, and distribution dynamics globally influence material choices, supply chains, and product strategies
Regional dynamics materially shape supply chain design, regulatory compliance, and growth opportunity for barrier shrink films. In the Americas, proximity to large consumer markets and a strong converter base places a premium on supply chain resilience and quick-turn customization. The region’s regulatory landscape is increasingly focused on recyclability standards and labeling transparency, which drives demand for recyclable-compatible barrier solutions and clear chain-of-custody documentation from resin suppliers and converters.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor and ambitious circularity goals push manufacturers toward higher recycled content and advanced sorting compatibility, while the breadth of economic conditions across the region creates differentiated adoption curves; some economies spearhead high-performance, sustainability-forward materials while others prioritize cost-effective, robust packaging for industrial distribution. Asia-Pacific remains the largest hub for film manufacturing capacity and resin production, and it is also an innovation center for material blends and high-speed conversion technologies. Rapid growth in retail infrastructure and e-commerce fulfillment in parts of the region has driven demand for films optimized for automated lines and long-distance transport protection. Taken together, regional forces influence who invests in new capacity, which technologies scale first, and how global firms design regional product portfolios to meet localized regulatory and customer demands.
Competitive and collaborative company strategies that drive R&D, capacity siting, and commercial differentiation through sustainability and service excellence
Competitive dynamics in the barrier shrink film space are marked by a balance of scale-based incumbents and innovative challengers that specialize in sustainable formulations, specialty barrier layers, or advanced converting services. Leading players typically invest heavily in R&D to improve barrier-to-weight ratios, expand recyclable or chemically recyclable constructions, and reduce the reliance on virgin petrochemical feedstocks. Partnerships between resin producers, additive specialists, and converters are increasingly common; these collaborations aim to accelerate commercialization of new film technologies and to smooth the path from lab-scale formulation to high-speed production runs.
Strategic moves by companies include targeted capacity additions in regions with favorable feedstock economics, alliances with converters to co-develop application-specific films, and investments in downstream finishing capabilities such as printing and laser scoring. Firms that differentiate through customer service tend to offer technical support for line trials, co-engineering for shrink profiles, and robust regulatory documentation to assist in food contact approvals. Companies that integrate sustainability metrics into product portfolios and that can demonstrate measurable reductions in carbon intensity or improved recyclability gain a competitive edge among brand owners and retailers who must meet evolving ESG commitments.
Practical strategic priorities and execution levers that leaders can adopt to align product innovation, supply resilience, and customer collaboration for sustainable growth
Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged strategy that aligns innovation with risk mitigation and customer intimacy. First, prioritize materials and formulations that enable high barrier performance while improving recyclability or enabling chemical recovery; investments in coextruded, thinner constructions and compatibilizing additives can reduce material use without compromising protection. Second, reinforce supply chain flexibility by diversifying supplier bases and incorporating dual sourcing for critical resins and specialty additives; contractual frameworks that allow rapid volume shifts reduce exposure to tariff and logistics shocks.
Third, deepen engagement with brand owners and converters through joint development programs that shorten commercialization timelines and ensure manufacturability at scale. Fourth, deploy targeted regional strategies that reflect local regulatory landscapes and customer expectations-invest in automation and digital quality controls in regions where high-speed converting is essential, while prioritizing cost-competitive, robust constructions in markets where cost sensitivity predominates. Finally, build measurable sustainability narratives supported by lifecycle data and third-party verification to capture procurement preference from sustainability-conscious customers and to satisfy increasingly stringent regulatory reporting requirements.
A mixed-method research approach combining industry interviews, technical validation, production data synthesis, and scenario analysis to ensure robust, actionable findings
The research methodology applies a blended, evidence-driven approach to ensure analytical rigor and practical relevance. Primary research included structured interviews with packaging engineers, procurement leads, converter operations managers, and brand-side sustainability officers to capture first-hand perspectives on performance trade-offs, procurement constraints, and innovation adoption barriers. These qualitative insights were triangulated with technical documentation, supplier white papers, and publicly available regulatory filings to validate material properties and application suitability.
Quantitative synthesis relied on a combination of converter production data, resin and additive input trends, and logistics indicators to understand capacity distributions and supply chain flows. Scenario analysis was used to model the implications of tariff shocks, feedstock price volatility, and regulatory tightening on sourcing strategies and capital planning. Throughout the methodology, attention to data provenance and cross-validation ensured that conclusions are grounded in verifiable operational realities and reflect the practical considerations that govern specification and procurement decisions across the value chain.
A synthesized outlook that ties technical innovation, circularity imperatives, and supply chain resilience into clear priorities for manufacturers, converters, and brand owners
The cumulative analysis underscores that barrier shrink films are at a strategic inflection point where material science, circularity demands, and supply chain resilience converge. Innovation will continue to be driven by the need to maintain or improve barrier performance while reducing environmental impact and adapting to shifting trade policies. Companies that succeed will be those that integrate material innovation with commercial agility-aligning product engineering, supply chain strategy, and customer co-development to capture value and reduce vulnerability to policy shocks.
Decision-makers should view current market dynamics as an opportunity to reconfigure portfolios, strengthen supplier relationships, and invest selectively in capabilities that accelerate time to market for sustainable and high-performing film solutions. By doing so, manufacturers, converters, and brand owners can simultaneously meet regulatory expectations, satisfy consumer preferences for sustainability and convenience, and protect product integrity across increasingly complex distribution networks.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic orientation to barrier shrink film fundamentals, functional trade-offs, and the commercial value drivers shaping specification choices across supply chains
Barrier shrink films sit at the intersection of materials science, packaging engineering, and evolving supply chain expectations. This report opens with a concise orientation to the technology and commercial drivers that shape how barrier films are specified, sourced, and deployed across end-use sectors. The introduction frames the material distinctions that influence barrier performance, machinability, and sustainability credentials, and explains why these factors matter to brand owners, converters, and packaging engineers alike.
Beyond technical definitions, the introduction highlights practical trade-offs between oxygen and moisture barrier, clarity and toughness, and the manufacturing modalities that enable high-throughput converting. It also situates barrier shrink films within broader packaging strategies such as shelf life extension, product protection in transit, and consumer-facing aesthetics. By establishing this foundation, the introduction ensures readers understand how materials, product types, applications, and commercial imperatives interrelate in shaping adoption and innovation.
How regulatory pressure, sustainability demands, manufacturing innovation, and evolving retail channels are collectively reshaping barrier shrink film design and sourcing
The landscape for barrier shrink films is undergoing rapid, transformative change driven by converging forces of regulation, consumer expectation, and technological progress. Sustainability mandates and extended producer responsibility schemes are accelerating the search for lower-carbon feedstocks, higher recycled-content formulations, and designs that enable circularity without compromising barrier integrity. At the same time, brands are demanding packaging that balances protection with shelf appeal, prompting innovations in film clarity, printability, and tactile finish that do not sacrifice gas and moisture barrier performance.
Concurrently, advancements in coextrusion, multilayer laminates, and nanocomposite additives are enabling thinner constructions that maintain barrier performance while reducing resin use and transport weight. E-commerce growth and omnichannel distribution patterns are reshaping mechanical performance requirements, with increased emphasis on puncture resistance and load stability. Digital printing and smarter label integration are loosening constraints on short-run customization, creating opportunities for regional converters to deliver differentiated solutions. Taken together, these shifts are redefining supplier value propositions and accelerating the reconfiguration of supply networks toward resilient, sustainability-aligned models.
The compounded supply chain, sourcing, capital, and cost management consequences of the United States tariff measures taking effect in 2025
The introduction of United States tariffs scheduled for 2025 has introduced significant strategic consequences across procurement, manufacturing footprint decisions, and supply chain timing. Firms that previously relied on certain international suppliers are reassessing total landed costs to account for tariff-driven input price variability, leading many to re-evaluate long-standing sourcing relationships and to accelerate nearshoring or dual-sourcing strategies to mitigate exposure. This recalibration affects not only resin procurement but also specialty additives and multilayer film laminates which often cross borders multiple times during conversion.
Tariff policy has a ripple effect on converter investment decisions, with some firms deferring capital projects in regions where cost pass-through is uncertain while others accelerate automation and efficiency projects to offset margin pressure. Brand owners face decisions between absorbing higher packaging costs and redesigning packaging to use less tariff-sensitive materials or domestically sourced resin streams. In parallel, increased tariff volatility heightens the value of flexible supply agreements and inventory management tactics such as strategic safety stocks and more dynamic freight routing. The overall consequence is a more defensive, diversification-oriented posture across the value chain that privileges agility, contractual flexibility, and supplier transparency.
Deep segmentation-driven insights that map material families, packaging formats, product types, application clusters, and end-user industry requirements to commercial priorities
Segmentation analysis reveals where technical needs and commercial priorities converge in barrier shrink film selection and application. Based on material, performance tiers vary across Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol, Polyethylene, Polypropylene, Polyvinyl Chloride, and Polyvinylidene Chloride, with Polyethylene further differentiated into HDPE, LDPE, and LLDPE variants to address distinct balance points between stiffness, clarity, and seal strength. Each material family presents its own processing windows and compatibility considerations for multilayer coextrusion and lamination.
Based on packaging type, design choices must juggle the mechanical demands of bundle wrap, collation wrap, label and unit load functions, pallet wrap, and sleeve wrap, while sleeve designs split into cold-shrink sleeve and heat-shrink sleeve processes that influence film composition and conversion equipment. Based on product, consumer and industrial requirements drive the choice between cling and non-cling films; cling films subdivide into hand wrap and machine wrap use cases, while non-cling options may be plain or printed depending on branding and traceability needs. Based on application, diverse end uses such as food packaging, industrial packaging, pharmaceutical packaging, and retail packaging impose bespoke barrier, clarity, and regulatory demands; food packaging itself breaks down into bakery and confectionery, dairy, fresh produce, and meat and poultry applications, each with particular shelf-life and safety requirements. Industrial packaging further organizes around bundle wrap, collation wrap, and pallet wrap needs, whereas pharmaceutical packaging emphasizes blister film and bottle wrap integrity and traceability. Based on end user industry, adoption patterns differ across automotive, consumer electronics, food and beverage, and pharmaceuticals, with the latter two driving especially stringent safety, hygiene, and regulatory documentation requirements.
Integrating these segmentation dimensions reveals where innovation and commercial opportunity intersect, and it clarifies which material and conversion pathways are most attractive for specific application clusters and downstream buyer requirements.
How regional regulatory priorities, manufacturing capacity centers, and distribution dynamics globally influence material choices, supply chains, and product strategies
Regional dynamics materially shape supply chain design, regulatory compliance, and growth opportunity for barrier shrink films. In the Americas, proximity to large consumer markets and a strong converter base places a premium on supply chain resilience and quick-turn customization. The region’s regulatory landscape is increasingly focused on recyclability standards and labeling transparency, which drives demand for recyclable-compatible barrier solutions and clear chain-of-custody documentation from resin suppliers and converters.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor and ambitious circularity goals push manufacturers toward higher recycled content and advanced sorting compatibility, while the breadth of economic conditions across the region creates differentiated adoption curves; some economies spearhead high-performance, sustainability-forward materials while others prioritize cost-effective, robust packaging for industrial distribution. Asia-Pacific remains the largest hub for film manufacturing capacity and resin production, and it is also an innovation center for material blends and high-speed conversion technologies. Rapid growth in retail infrastructure and e-commerce fulfillment in parts of the region has driven demand for films optimized for automated lines and long-distance transport protection. Taken together, regional forces influence who invests in new capacity, which technologies scale first, and how global firms design regional product portfolios to meet localized regulatory and customer demands.
Competitive and collaborative company strategies that drive R&D, capacity siting, and commercial differentiation through sustainability and service excellence
Competitive dynamics in the barrier shrink film space are marked by a balance of scale-based incumbents and innovative challengers that specialize in sustainable formulations, specialty barrier layers, or advanced converting services. Leading players typically invest heavily in R&D to improve barrier-to-weight ratios, expand recyclable or chemically recyclable constructions, and reduce the reliance on virgin petrochemical feedstocks. Partnerships between resin producers, additive specialists, and converters are increasingly common; these collaborations aim to accelerate commercialization of new film technologies and to smooth the path from lab-scale formulation to high-speed production runs.
Strategic moves by companies include targeted capacity additions in regions with favorable feedstock economics, alliances with converters to co-develop application-specific films, and investments in downstream finishing capabilities such as printing and laser scoring. Firms that differentiate through customer service tend to offer technical support for line trials, co-engineering for shrink profiles, and robust regulatory documentation to assist in food contact approvals. Companies that integrate sustainability metrics into product portfolios and that can demonstrate measurable reductions in carbon intensity or improved recyclability gain a competitive edge among brand owners and retailers who must meet evolving ESG commitments.
Practical strategic priorities and execution levers that leaders can adopt to align product innovation, supply resilience, and customer collaboration for sustainable growth
Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged strategy that aligns innovation with risk mitigation and customer intimacy. First, prioritize materials and formulations that enable high barrier performance while improving recyclability or enabling chemical recovery; investments in coextruded, thinner constructions and compatibilizing additives can reduce material use without compromising protection. Second, reinforce supply chain flexibility by diversifying supplier bases and incorporating dual sourcing for critical resins and specialty additives; contractual frameworks that allow rapid volume shifts reduce exposure to tariff and logistics shocks.
Third, deepen engagement with brand owners and converters through joint development programs that shorten commercialization timelines and ensure manufacturability at scale. Fourth, deploy targeted regional strategies that reflect local regulatory landscapes and customer expectations-invest in automation and digital quality controls in regions where high-speed converting is essential, while prioritizing cost-competitive, robust constructions in markets where cost sensitivity predominates. Finally, build measurable sustainability narratives supported by lifecycle data and third-party verification to capture procurement preference from sustainability-conscious customers and to satisfy increasingly stringent regulatory reporting requirements.
A mixed-method research approach combining industry interviews, technical validation, production data synthesis, and scenario analysis to ensure robust, actionable findings
The research methodology applies a blended, evidence-driven approach to ensure analytical rigor and practical relevance. Primary research included structured interviews with packaging engineers, procurement leads, converter operations managers, and brand-side sustainability officers to capture first-hand perspectives on performance trade-offs, procurement constraints, and innovation adoption barriers. These qualitative insights were triangulated with technical documentation, supplier white papers, and publicly available regulatory filings to validate material properties and application suitability.
Quantitative synthesis relied on a combination of converter production data, resin and additive input trends, and logistics indicators to understand capacity distributions and supply chain flows. Scenario analysis was used to model the implications of tariff shocks, feedstock price volatility, and regulatory tightening on sourcing strategies and capital planning. Throughout the methodology, attention to data provenance and cross-validation ensured that conclusions are grounded in verifiable operational realities and reflect the practical considerations that govern specification and procurement decisions across the value chain.
A synthesized outlook that ties technical innovation, circularity imperatives, and supply chain resilience into clear priorities for manufacturers, converters, and brand owners
The cumulative analysis underscores that barrier shrink films are at a strategic inflection point where material science, circularity demands, and supply chain resilience converge. Innovation will continue to be driven by the need to maintain or improve barrier performance while reducing environmental impact and adapting to shifting trade policies. Companies that succeed will be those that integrate material innovation with commercial agility-aligning product engineering, supply chain strategy, and customer co-development to capture value and reduce vulnerability to policy shocks.
Decision-makers should view current market dynamics as an opportunity to reconfigure portfolios, strengthen supplier relationships, and invest selectively in capabilities that accelerate time to market for sustainable and high-performing film solutions. By doing so, manufacturers, converters, and brand owners can simultaneously meet regulatory expectations, satisfy consumer preferences for sustainability and convenience, and protect product integrity across increasingly complex distribution networks.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising demand for recyclable multilayer barrier shrink films to meet global sustainability targets
- 5.2. Growing adoption of bio-based barrier shrink films derived from plant polymers in packaging design
- 5.3. Technological breakthroughs in nanocomposite coatings enhancing barrier shrink film performance and shelf life
- 5.4. Integration of active and intelligent packaging features within barrier shrink films for freshness monitoring and spoilage detection
- 5.5. Expansion of high-speed automated shrink wrapping systems compatible with advanced barrier films in logistics
- 5.6. Regulatory initiatives driving stricter migration limits and safety standards for barrier shrink film raw materials globally
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Barrier Shrink Films Market, by Material
- 8.1. Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol
- 8.2. Polyethylene
- 8.2.1. Hdpe
- 8.2.2. Ldpe
- 8.2.3. Lldpe
- 8.3. Polypropylene
- 8.4. Polyvinyl Chloride
- 8.5. Polyvinylidene Chloride
- 9. Barrier Shrink Films Market, by Packaging Type
- 9.1. Bundle Wrap
- 9.2. Collation Wrap
- 9.3. Label & Unit Load
- 9.4. Pallet Wrap
- 9.5. Sleeve Wrap
- 9.5.1. Cold-Shrink Sleeve
- 9.5.2. Heat-Shrink Sleeve
- 10. Barrier Shrink Films Market, by Product
- 10.1. Cling
- 10.1.1. Hand Wrap
- 10.1.2. Machine Wrap
- 10.2. Non-Cling
- 10.2.1. Plain
- 10.2.2. Printed
- 11. Barrier Shrink Films Market, by Application
- 11.1. Food Packaging
- 11.1.1. Bakery & Confectionery
- 11.1.2. Dairy
- 11.1.3. Fresh Produce
- 11.1.4. Meat & Poultry
- 11.2. Industrial Packaging
- 11.2.1. Bundle Wrap
- 11.2.2. Collation Wrap
- 11.2.3. Pallet Wrap
- 11.3. Pharmaceutical Packaging
- 11.3.1. Blister Film
- 11.3.2. Bottle Wrap
- 11.4. Retail Packaging
- 11.4.1. Bags
- 11.4.2. Pouches
- 12. Barrier Shrink Films Market, by End User Industry
- 12.1. Automotive
- 12.2. Consumer Electronics
- 12.3. Food & Beverage
- 12.4. Pharmaceuticals
- 13. Barrier Shrink Films Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Barrier Shrink Films Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Barrier Shrink Films Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Amcor plc
- 16.3.2. Berry Global Group, Inc.
- 16.3.3. CCL Industries Inc.
- 16.3.4. Constantia Flexibles GmbH
- 16.3.5. Cosmo Films Ltd.
- 16.3.6. Coveris Holdings S.A.
- 16.3.7. Huhtamaki Oyj
- 16.3.8. Innovia Films Ltd.
- 16.3.9. Jindal Poly Films Ltd.
- 16.3.10. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
- 16.3.11. Mondi plc
- 16.3.12. ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
- 16.3.13. Sealed Air Corporation
- 16.3.14. Toray Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.15. Uflex Limited
- 16.3.16. Winpak Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
