Barley Market by Type (Hull Less, Six Row, Two Row), Form (Flakes, Flour, Pearled), Cultivation, Application, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Barley Market was valued at USD 23.08 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 24.14 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.90%, reaching USD 33.85 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction explaining barley’s multifaceted role across agriculture, supply chains, and end-use industries that shape strategic commercial decisions
Barley occupies a foundational role in global agriculture, serving dual functions as both a critical input for animal feed and a versatile ingredient for human food and beverage production. Historically cultivated across diverse climatic zones, barley has evolved from a subsistence crop to a strategic commodity that links farm-level agronomy with complex value chains including malting, brewing, distilling, and processed foods. This evolution has been shaped by breeding advances, shifting consumer preferences, and the intensification of livestock systems that rely on cereal grains for nutrition.
As stakeholders evaluate barley’s contemporary relevance, it becomes apparent that interdependencies between growers, processors, and end users determine how value is created and captured. On-farm decisions about varietal selection and cultivation practices have downstream effects on malting quality, feed conversion efficiency, and food processing characteristics. Meanwhile, processors and buyers increasingly demand traceability, consistent quality, and sustainable credentials, which in turn influence agronomic choices and investment priorities.
Consequently, decision-makers must approach barley not merely as a commodity but as an engineered input whose attributes are shaped by genetics, agronomy, and post-harvest handling. This introduction frames the subsequent analysis by situating barley within contemporary supply chain dynamics, regulatory considerations, and consumption trends that are collectively redefining both strategic risk and opportunity across the value chain.
Exploration of the major transformative forces reshaping the barley sector including climate stress, technological adoption, consumer preferences, and regulatory evolution
The barley landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by climate variability, technological innovation, and evolving consumer expectations that span sustainability and product quality. Rising climatic pressures are altering yield stability and regional suitability, prompting breeders and seed companies to prioritize traits such as drought tolerance, disease resistance, and end-use quality. Simultaneously, precision agriculture and remote-sensing technologies are enabling growers to intensify productivity while managing resource inputs more judiciously, thereby reducing costs and environmental footprint.
On the demand side, consumers’ interest in functional foods and craft beverages is stimulating product innovation, encouraging malters and food processors to differentiate on flavor profiles, nutritional benefits, and provenance. Meanwhile, regulatory and trade policy shifts are exerting a substantial influence on procurement patterns and contractual relationships, prompting commercial actors to diversify sourcing and enhance contractual flexibility. In parallel, sustainability and traceability requirements emerging from retailers and institutional buyers are accelerating investments in certification, carbon accounting, and supply chain transparency tools.
Taken together, these shifts are producing a more dynamic, risk-aware ecosystem in which collaboration among breeders, producers, processors, and distributors becomes essential. Organizations that align technological adoption with market-facing differentiation and robust risk management will be better positioned to capture value and mitigate disruption across the barley value chain.
Assessment of how the 2025 United States tariff adjustments reshaped global barley procurement, supply chain resilience, and downstream industry sourcing strategies
The cumulative effect of new tariff measures imposed by the United States in 2025 has reverberated across global barley trade and downstream industries, reshaping procurement logic and supply chain design. Tariff implementation prompted immediate contractual renegotiations among exporters and buyers, encouraging importers in affected markets to source from alternative regions while incentivizing domestic processors to re-evaluate upstream supplier relationships. This reorientation increased logistical complexity and placed a premium on supply chain agility and alternative sourcing channels.
Consequently, maltsters and brewers that previously relied on established import corridors began exploring regional or domestically grown varieties that meet quality specifications. Procurement teams adapted by incorporating contingency clauses and shorter-term purchasing commitments to accommodate fluctuating trade costs and to preserve margin integrity. At the farm level, growers who supplied export-oriented contracts faced price uncertainty and demand volatility, which influenced planting decisions and risk aversion toward long-term varietal investments.
In response to heightened trade barriers, stakeholders intensified collaboration with logistics providers and engaged in more granular quality assurance to maintain value capture under shifting cost structures. Financial actors and insurers also adjusted underwriting criteria for trade exposure and crop revenue protection. Ultimately, the 2025 tariff changes underscored the need for diversified sourcing, enhanced contract flexibility, and investment in value preservation mechanisms across the barley ecosystem.
In-depth segmentation analysis outlining application, varietal, form, cultivation, and distribution distinctions that drive differentiated strategies across the barley value chain
A robust segmentation framework reveals nuanced demand drivers and operational imperatives across application, type, form, cultivation, and distribution channels that together shape competitive strategy and product development. Based on Application, market is studied across Feed, Food, and Malting with Feed further dissected into aquaculture feed, cattle feed, poultry feed, and swine feed, Food subdivided into bakery, breakfast cereals, snacks, and soups & stews, and Malting segmented into brewing and distilling; these distinctions highlight divergent quality specifications, logistical priorities, and value capture opportunities for each end use. Feed applications emphasize nutritional consistency and cost-efficiency, whereas food uses demand functional and sensory attributes, and malting imposes strict quality thresholds for enzyme activity and protein composition.
Based on Type, market is studied across hull less, six row, and two row, each presenting different agronomic profiles and suitability for specific end uses; hull less varieties can reduce processing costs for food producers, while six row and two row types retain historical relevance for distinct brewing traditions and feed mixes. Based on Form, market is studied across flakes, flour, pearled, and whole grain, and these formats influence processing pathways, shelf life, and nutritional labeling strategies; processors must align milling and thermal treatments to desired product claims.
Based on Cultivation, market is studied across conventional and organic which carry different input models, certification burdens, and price dynamics, and require distinct traceability and agronomic management. Based on Distribution Channel, market is studied across offline and online with offline further studied across grocery stores, hypermarkets, and supermarkets and online further studied across direct sales and e-commerce platforms; channel choices affect packaging, lead times, and buyer relationships, necessitating tailored marketing and inventory approaches to optimize reach and margin retention.
Key regional perspectives on how geographic production strengths, consumer preferences, and trade dynamics interact to shape barley value creation across major world regions
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on barley production systems, trade flows, and end-use specializations, demanding region-specific strategies and cross-border collaboration. In the Americas, broad-acre production systems combined with integrated livestock operations emphasize feed demand and export-orientated malting hubs; logistical infrastructure and scale advantages support competitive positioning, yet climatic variability and evolving input costs require adaptive risk management. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex mosaic where traditional malting regions coexist with emerging demand centers, regulatory frameworks focus heavily on food safety and sustainability, and logistics fragmentation in some areas elevates the importance of near-source processing and consolidation.
Asia-Pacific exhibits diverse demand drivers, from growing food industry sophistication and rising craft beverage consumption in urban markets to significant feed demand linked to aquaculture and intensive livestock systems. Import dependency in certain economies reinforces the strategic importance of securing high-quality malting barley and optimizing cold-chain and storage solutions. Across regions, trade policy shifts and localized consumer preferences influence how value is realized, while investments in agritech, infrastructure, and certification can unlock new market access.
Therefore, successful regional strategies balance local agronomic capability with targeted investments in processing, traceability, and logistics, while remaining cognizant of cross-regional dependencies that can either amplify risk or provide diversification opportunities.
Critical company-level insights into how strategic breeding, vertical integration, and sustainability investments determine competitive advantage and supply stability
Competitive dynamics within the barley industry are shaped by a combination of innovation, supply chain integration, and strategic partnerships that transcend traditional producer-processor boundaries. Leading firms and value chain integrators are increasingly investing in breeding programs aimed at quality traits that satisfy malting and food processors, while simultaneously collaborating with growers to secure consistent supply through contract farming and agronomic support. Such vertical coordination reduces quality variability and enables forward planning for processors dependent on specific grain attributes.
At the same time, companies are differentiating through investments in sustainability credentials, traceability systems, and product innovation that respond to health-conscious and provenance-seeking consumers. Partnerships between technology providers and agricultural stakeholders are facilitating data-driven yield optimization and input efficiency, which can translate into more reliable raw-material quality. Financial players and off-takers have expanded risk management offerings, including hedging and bespoke insurance solutions, to stabilize revenues in the face of policy and climate volatility.
Collectively, these strategic moves highlight the importance of coordinated investment across breeding, cultivation, processing, and distribution. Firms that combine product differentiation with resilient sourcing arrangements and digital-enabled transparency will capture disproportionate value and reduce exposure to external shocks.
Actionable, pragmatic recommendations focused on sourcing diversification, varietal investment, traceability, and channel optimization to strengthen resilience and competitive positioning
Industry leaders must execute a set of pragmatic, forward-looking initiatives to bolster resilience and unlock new growth pathways across the barley value chain. First, diversification of sourcing and the development of alternative procurement corridors can diminish exposure to tariff-driven disruptions and climate shocks, while longer-term partnerships with growers support varietal consistency and supply security. Second, targeted investments in breeding for abiotic stress tolerance and end-use quality will help align on-farm outputs with processor specifications, thereby reducing processing losses and enhancing product premiums.
Third, implementing robust traceability and sustainability frameworks will respond to buyer expectations and regulatory pressures, providing tangible differentiation in food and beverage markets. Fourth, channel strategies should balance offline retail presence with scalable online and direct-sales models to capture changing consumption patterns and to reduce inventory obsolescence. Fifth, operational players should prioritize collaborative risk management, including contract design that accommodates policy shifts and flexible logistics arrangements that enable rapid rerouting when trade conditions change.
Finally, leaders should embed scenario planning and regular stress-testing into corporate governance to ensure strategic adaptability. By combining supply-side investments with market-facing differentiation and proactive risk governance, organizations can strengthen their competitive position and respond effectively to rapidly evolving conditions.
Transparent mixed-methods research methodology combining primary stakeholder engagement, secondary synthesis, and scenario analysis to ensure credible, actionable findings
The research employs a mixed-methods approach centered on primary engagement with industry stakeholders, comprehensive secondary literature synthesis, and rigorous triangulation to ensure analytic robustness and practical relevance. Primary inputs included structured interviews and consultations with growers, processors, malting specialists, feed formulators, and supply chain managers to capture qualitative insights into operational constraints, quality requirements, and strategic priorities. These direct engagements were complemented by systematic review of publicly available agronomic studies, technical breeding publications, and regulatory documentation to contextualize field-level observations within broader industry trends.
Data triangulation combined production practice evidence with trade flow analysis and supply chain mapping to illuminate points of vulnerability and resilience. Scenario exercises and sensitivity checks were used to explore alternative outcomes under different policy and climatic assumptions, while methodological safeguards-such as cross-validation with multiple respondent categories and iterative fact-checking-ensured consistency and credibility. Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on transparent documentation of assumptions, a clear delineation between observed behavior and inferred implications, and an iterative feedback loop with subject matter experts to refine interpretations.
This layered methodology produces actionable insights grounded in stakeholder realities and supported by cross-verified evidence, providing a solid foundation for strategic decision-making across the barley value chain.
Conclusive synthesis emphasizing resilience, cross-sector collaboration, and strategic investments as the core imperatives to navigate evolving barley market challenges
Barley’s strategic importance spans food security, industrial inputs, and regional economic activity, but its future trajectory will depend on the sector’s capacity to adapt to policy shifts, climatic variability, and evolving consumer demands. Recent trade policy changes and shifting end-use preferences have highlighted the fragility of tightly coupled supply chains and the premium associated with quality, traceability, and adaptability. As a result, stakeholders across the value chain must adopt integrated strategies that reconcile agronomic realities with market requirements and regulatory expectations.
Resilience will be built through diversified sourcing, concerted varietal and agronomic investment, and adoption of digital tools that enhance transparency and operational efficiency. Concurrently, product innovation and targeted channel strategies can create premium opportunities that reward quality and sustainability commitments. Ultimately, collaboration between growers, processors, technology providers, and institutional buyers will be the defining factor in converting systemic risks into competitive advantage.
In summary, the barley sector stands at an inflection point where proactive strategy, cross-sector cooperation, and disciplined implementation can preserve value and enable new growth paths despite external uncertainties.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction explaining barley’s multifaceted role across agriculture, supply chains, and end-use industries that shape strategic commercial decisions
Barley occupies a foundational role in global agriculture, serving dual functions as both a critical input for animal feed and a versatile ingredient for human food and beverage production. Historically cultivated across diverse climatic zones, barley has evolved from a subsistence crop to a strategic commodity that links farm-level agronomy with complex value chains including malting, brewing, distilling, and processed foods. This evolution has been shaped by breeding advances, shifting consumer preferences, and the intensification of livestock systems that rely on cereal grains for nutrition.
As stakeholders evaluate barley’s contemporary relevance, it becomes apparent that interdependencies between growers, processors, and end users determine how value is created and captured. On-farm decisions about varietal selection and cultivation practices have downstream effects on malting quality, feed conversion efficiency, and food processing characteristics. Meanwhile, processors and buyers increasingly demand traceability, consistent quality, and sustainable credentials, which in turn influence agronomic choices and investment priorities.
Consequently, decision-makers must approach barley not merely as a commodity but as an engineered input whose attributes are shaped by genetics, agronomy, and post-harvest handling. This introduction frames the subsequent analysis by situating barley within contemporary supply chain dynamics, regulatory considerations, and consumption trends that are collectively redefining both strategic risk and opportunity across the value chain.
Exploration of the major transformative forces reshaping the barley sector including climate stress, technological adoption, consumer preferences, and regulatory evolution
The barley landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by climate variability, technological innovation, and evolving consumer expectations that span sustainability and product quality. Rising climatic pressures are altering yield stability and regional suitability, prompting breeders and seed companies to prioritize traits such as drought tolerance, disease resistance, and end-use quality. Simultaneously, precision agriculture and remote-sensing technologies are enabling growers to intensify productivity while managing resource inputs more judiciously, thereby reducing costs and environmental footprint.
On the demand side, consumers’ interest in functional foods and craft beverages is stimulating product innovation, encouraging malters and food processors to differentiate on flavor profiles, nutritional benefits, and provenance. Meanwhile, regulatory and trade policy shifts are exerting a substantial influence on procurement patterns and contractual relationships, prompting commercial actors to diversify sourcing and enhance contractual flexibility. In parallel, sustainability and traceability requirements emerging from retailers and institutional buyers are accelerating investments in certification, carbon accounting, and supply chain transparency tools.
Taken together, these shifts are producing a more dynamic, risk-aware ecosystem in which collaboration among breeders, producers, processors, and distributors becomes essential. Organizations that align technological adoption with market-facing differentiation and robust risk management will be better positioned to capture value and mitigate disruption across the barley value chain.
Assessment of how the 2025 United States tariff adjustments reshaped global barley procurement, supply chain resilience, and downstream industry sourcing strategies
The cumulative effect of new tariff measures imposed by the United States in 2025 has reverberated across global barley trade and downstream industries, reshaping procurement logic and supply chain design. Tariff implementation prompted immediate contractual renegotiations among exporters and buyers, encouraging importers in affected markets to source from alternative regions while incentivizing domestic processors to re-evaluate upstream supplier relationships. This reorientation increased logistical complexity and placed a premium on supply chain agility and alternative sourcing channels.
Consequently, maltsters and brewers that previously relied on established import corridors began exploring regional or domestically grown varieties that meet quality specifications. Procurement teams adapted by incorporating contingency clauses and shorter-term purchasing commitments to accommodate fluctuating trade costs and to preserve margin integrity. At the farm level, growers who supplied export-oriented contracts faced price uncertainty and demand volatility, which influenced planting decisions and risk aversion toward long-term varietal investments.
In response to heightened trade barriers, stakeholders intensified collaboration with logistics providers and engaged in more granular quality assurance to maintain value capture under shifting cost structures. Financial actors and insurers also adjusted underwriting criteria for trade exposure and crop revenue protection. Ultimately, the 2025 tariff changes underscored the need for diversified sourcing, enhanced contract flexibility, and investment in value preservation mechanisms across the barley ecosystem.
In-depth segmentation analysis outlining application, varietal, form, cultivation, and distribution distinctions that drive differentiated strategies across the barley value chain
A robust segmentation framework reveals nuanced demand drivers and operational imperatives across application, type, form, cultivation, and distribution channels that together shape competitive strategy and product development. Based on Application, market is studied across Feed, Food, and Malting with Feed further dissected into aquaculture feed, cattle feed, poultry feed, and swine feed, Food subdivided into bakery, breakfast cereals, snacks, and soups & stews, and Malting segmented into brewing and distilling; these distinctions highlight divergent quality specifications, logistical priorities, and value capture opportunities for each end use. Feed applications emphasize nutritional consistency and cost-efficiency, whereas food uses demand functional and sensory attributes, and malting imposes strict quality thresholds for enzyme activity and protein composition.
Based on Type, market is studied across hull less, six row, and two row, each presenting different agronomic profiles and suitability for specific end uses; hull less varieties can reduce processing costs for food producers, while six row and two row types retain historical relevance for distinct brewing traditions and feed mixes. Based on Form, market is studied across flakes, flour, pearled, and whole grain, and these formats influence processing pathways, shelf life, and nutritional labeling strategies; processors must align milling and thermal treatments to desired product claims.
Based on Cultivation, market is studied across conventional and organic which carry different input models, certification burdens, and price dynamics, and require distinct traceability and agronomic management. Based on Distribution Channel, market is studied across offline and online with offline further studied across grocery stores, hypermarkets, and supermarkets and online further studied across direct sales and e-commerce platforms; channel choices affect packaging, lead times, and buyer relationships, necessitating tailored marketing and inventory approaches to optimize reach and margin retention.
Key regional perspectives on how geographic production strengths, consumer preferences, and trade dynamics interact to shape barley value creation across major world regions
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on barley production systems, trade flows, and end-use specializations, demanding region-specific strategies and cross-border collaboration. In the Americas, broad-acre production systems combined with integrated livestock operations emphasize feed demand and export-orientated malting hubs; logistical infrastructure and scale advantages support competitive positioning, yet climatic variability and evolving input costs require adaptive risk management. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex mosaic where traditional malting regions coexist with emerging demand centers, regulatory frameworks focus heavily on food safety and sustainability, and logistics fragmentation in some areas elevates the importance of near-source processing and consolidation.
Asia-Pacific exhibits diverse demand drivers, from growing food industry sophistication and rising craft beverage consumption in urban markets to significant feed demand linked to aquaculture and intensive livestock systems. Import dependency in certain economies reinforces the strategic importance of securing high-quality malting barley and optimizing cold-chain and storage solutions. Across regions, trade policy shifts and localized consumer preferences influence how value is realized, while investments in agritech, infrastructure, and certification can unlock new market access.
Therefore, successful regional strategies balance local agronomic capability with targeted investments in processing, traceability, and logistics, while remaining cognizant of cross-regional dependencies that can either amplify risk or provide diversification opportunities.
Critical company-level insights into how strategic breeding, vertical integration, and sustainability investments determine competitive advantage and supply stability
Competitive dynamics within the barley industry are shaped by a combination of innovation, supply chain integration, and strategic partnerships that transcend traditional producer-processor boundaries. Leading firms and value chain integrators are increasingly investing in breeding programs aimed at quality traits that satisfy malting and food processors, while simultaneously collaborating with growers to secure consistent supply through contract farming and agronomic support. Such vertical coordination reduces quality variability and enables forward planning for processors dependent on specific grain attributes.
At the same time, companies are differentiating through investments in sustainability credentials, traceability systems, and product innovation that respond to health-conscious and provenance-seeking consumers. Partnerships between technology providers and agricultural stakeholders are facilitating data-driven yield optimization and input efficiency, which can translate into more reliable raw-material quality. Financial players and off-takers have expanded risk management offerings, including hedging and bespoke insurance solutions, to stabilize revenues in the face of policy and climate volatility.
Collectively, these strategic moves highlight the importance of coordinated investment across breeding, cultivation, processing, and distribution. Firms that combine product differentiation with resilient sourcing arrangements and digital-enabled transparency will capture disproportionate value and reduce exposure to external shocks.
Actionable, pragmatic recommendations focused on sourcing diversification, varietal investment, traceability, and channel optimization to strengthen resilience and competitive positioning
Industry leaders must execute a set of pragmatic, forward-looking initiatives to bolster resilience and unlock new growth pathways across the barley value chain. First, diversification of sourcing and the development of alternative procurement corridors can diminish exposure to tariff-driven disruptions and climate shocks, while longer-term partnerships with growers support varietal consistency and supply security. Second, targeted investments in breeding for abiotic stress tolerance and end-use quality will help align on-farm outputs with processor specifications, thereby reducing processing losses and enhancing product premiums.
Third, implementing robust traceability and sustainability frameworks will respond to buyer expectations and regulatory pressures, providing tangible differentiation in food and beverage markets. Fourth, channel strategies should balance offline retail presence with scalable online and direct-sales models to capture changing consumption patterns and to reduce inventory obsolescence. Fifth, operational players should prioritize collaborative risk management, including contract design that accommodates policy shifts and flexible logistics arrangements that enable rapid rerouting when trade conditions change.
Finally, leaders should embed scenario planning and regular stress-testing into corporate governance to ensure strategic adaptability. By combining supply-side investments with market-facing differentiation and proactive risk governance, organizations can strengthen their competitive position and respond effectively to rapidly evolving conditions.
Transparent mixed-methods research methodology combining primary stakeholder engagement, secondary synthesis, and scenario analysis to ensure credible, actionable findings
The research employs a mixed-methods approach centered on primary engagement with industry stakeholders, comprehensive secondary literature synthesis, and rigorous triangulation to ensure analytic robustness and practical relevance. Primary inputs included structured interviews and consultations with growers, processors, malting specialists, feed formulators, and supply chain managers to capture qualitative insights into operational constraints, quality requirements, and strategic priorities. These direct engagements were complemented by systematic review of publicly available agronomic studies, technical breeding publications, and regulatory documentation to contextualize field-level observations within broader industry trends.
Data triangulation combined production practice evidence with trade flow analysis and supply chain mapping to illuminate points of vulnerability and resilience. Scenario exercises and sensitivity checks were used to explore alternative outcomes under different policy and climatic assumptions, while methodological safeguards-such as cross-validation with multiple respondent categories and iterative fact-checking-ensured consistency and credibility. Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on transparent documentation of assumptions, a clear delineation between observed behavior and inferred implications, and an iterative feedback loop with subject matter experts to refine interpretations.
This layered methodology produces actionable insights grounded in stakeholder realities and supported by cross-verified evidence, providing a solid foundation for strategic decision-making across the barley value chain.
Conclusive synthesis emphasizing resilience, cross-sector collaboration, and strategic investments as the core imperatives to navigate evolving barley market challenges
Barley’s strategic importance spans food security, industrial inputs, and regional economic activity, but its future trajectory will depend on the sector’s capacity to adapt to policy shifts, climatic variability, and evolving consumer demands. Recent trade policy changes and shifting end-use preferences have highlighted the fragility of tightly coupled supply chains and the premium associated with quality, traceability, and adaptability. As a result, stakeholders across the value chain must adopt integrated strategies that reconcile agronomic realities with market requirements and regulatory expectations.
Resilience will be built through diversified sourcing, concerted varietal and agronomic investment, and adoption of digital tools that enhance transparency and operational efficiency. Concurrently, product innovation and targeted channel strategies can create premium opportunities that reward quality and sustainability commitments. Ultimately, collaboration between growers, processors, technology providers, and institutional buyers will be the defining factor in converting systemic risks into competitive advantage.
In summary, the barley sector stands at an inflection point where proactive strategy, cross-sector cooperation, and disciplined implementation can preserve value and enable new growth paths despite external uncertainties.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Surging consumer demand for barley protein isolates in plant-based nutrition markets
- 5.2. Integration of precision agriculture technologies to optimize barley yields and sustainability
- 5.3. Expansion of specialty malt barley varieties driven by rising demand from craft brewing sector
- 5.4. Development of barley-based functional ingredients targeting gut health and metabolic benefits
- 5.5. Adoption of ancient and heirloom barley varieties in premium bakery and artisan food products
- 5.6. Government incentives supporting barley cultivation for second-generation biofuel and ethanol production
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Barley Market, by Type
- 8.1. Hull Less
- 8.2. Six Row
- 8.3. Two Row
- 9. Barley Market, by Form
- 9.1. Flakes
- 9.2. Flour
- 9.3. Pearled
- 9.4. Whole Grain
- 10. Barley Market, by Cultivation
- 10.1. Conventional
- 10.2. Organic
- 11. Barley Market, by Application
- 11.1. Feed
- 11.1.1. Aquaculture Feed
- 11.1.2. Cattle Feed
- 11.1.3. Poultry Feed
- 11.1.4. Swine Feed
- 11.2. Food
- 11.2.1. Bakery
- 11.2.2. Breakfast Cereals
- 11.2.3. Snacks
- 11.2.4. Soups & Stews
- 11.3. Malting
- 11.3.1. Brewing
- 11.3.2. Distilling
- 12. Barley Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Offline
- 12.1.1. Grocery Stores
- 12.1.2. Hypermarkets
- 12.1.3. Supermarkets
- 12.2. Online
- 12.2.1. Direct Sales
- 12.2.2. E Commerce Platform
- 13. Barley Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Barley Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Barley Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
- 16.3.2. Boortmalt NV
- 16.3.3. Briess Malt & Ingredients Co.
- 16.3.4. Cargill, Incorporated
- 16.3.5. Coopers Brewery Limited
- 16.3.6. Crisp Malting Group Plc
- 16.3.7. GrainCorp Limited
- 16.3.8. Great River Organic Milling
- 16.3.9. Groupe Soufflet
- 16.3.10. Hometown Food Company
- 16.3.11. Imperial Malts Limited
- 16.3.12. Ireks Gmbh, Muntons Plc
- 16.3.13. Loar & Young, Inc.
- 16.3.14. Malteurop Groupe
- 16.3.15. Maltexco S.A
- 16.3.16. Montana Milling Inc.
- 16.3.17. Pramoda Exim Corporation
- 16.3.18. Simpsons Malt Group Limited
- 16.3.19. Soufflet Group
- 16.3.20. The Scoular Company
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.



