B2B Payments Market by Type (Cross-Border, Domestic), Payment Method (ACH Payments, Credit Cards, Cryptocurrency), Organization Size, End-User Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The B2B Payments Market was valued at USD 4.66 trillion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.97 trillion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.24%, reaching USD 8.15 trillion by 2032.
Framing the modern B2B payments environment with a focus on resilience, interoperability, and strategic modernization for finance and treasury leaders
The B2B payments domain stands at a pivotal juncture where technological innovation, regulatory recalibration, and global trade dynamics converge to reshape how organizations move value. Amid accelerated digitization, treasuries and finance teams are under pressure to modernize legacy rails, reduce reconciliation complexity, and improve working capital efficiency while maintaining rigorous controls. This introduction sets the stage by clarifying the scope of contemporary challenges and the practical levers that business leaders can apply to meet them.
Over the past several years, shifts in customer expectations and enterprise priorities have increased the need for real-time visibility and seamless integration across ERP and banking systems. As a result, finance leaders are reprioritizing investments toward interoperability, data standardization, and vendor consolidation. Moreover, evolving compliance regimes and heightened scrutiny around AML and sanctions screening make resilience and auditability non-negotiable elements of any payments roadmap.
In light of these pressures, this analysis focuses on the intersection of operational resilience, cost-to-serve optimization, and strategic adaptability. Consequently, readers can expect a balanced perspective that synthesizes regulatory trends, payments infrastructure advances, and commercial realities to inform judicious decision-making by executives and practitioners alike.
How rapid adoption of instant rails, tokenization, and payment orchestration is reshaping cross-border flows, compliance demands, and vendor models
Transformative shifts are redefining the payments landscape across infrastructure, instruments, and governance frameworks. First, the maturation of real-time and instant payment rails has reduced settlement latency, enabling improved cash forecasting and dynamic working capital strategies. At the same time, tokenization and advanced authentication reduce fraud exposure while adding layers of complexity for legacy reconciliation processes. Consequently, organisations must reconcile gains in speed and security with the operational demands of integration and exception handling.
Simultaneously, cross-border payments are undergoing structural change driven by new clearing models, regulatory harmonization efforts, and the increasing adoption of alternative rails such as ledger-based settlement systems. These developments are lowering some traditional frictions but also introducing new interoperability challenges that require institutions to redesign correspondent relationships and vendor arrangements. Furthermore, payment orchestration platforms and embedded finance solutions are accelerating the digitization of payment experiences, enabling software vendors and marketplaces to offer native payment flows that blur the lines between banking and commerce.
Finally, the regulatory environment is evolving with greater emphasis on transparency, data protection, and AML controls. This trend compels organizations to prioritize robust governance, invest in analytics for anomaly detection, and adopt flexible pricing models. Taken together, these shifts create both opportunities for competitive differentiation and responsibilities to manage technological and compliance complexity proactively.
Assessing how United States tariff adjustments for 2025 will influence payment timing, supplier negotiations, and treasury responses across global trade corridors
United States tariff changes announced for 2025 create a new layer of complexity for B2B payments by altering cost structures across global supply chains and injecting volatility into cross-border settlement priorities. As tariff adjustments affect landed costs and supplier margins, procurement and finance teams must revisit payment terms, working capital strategies, and currency hedging approaches. In practice, this means more frequent renegotiation of payment schedules and increased attention to payment timing as a lever to manage cash flow under shifting cost assumptions.
Moreover, tariff-driven shifts tend to concentrate risk on trade corridors most affected by rate changes, prompting firms to reassess their correspondent banking networks and to evaluate alternative payment rails that offer more predictable settlement mechanics. In addition, the administrative burden associated with compliance documentation, customs reconciliation, and tariff classification intensifies, requiring tighter integration between ERP systems, trade compliance platforms, and payments operations. Consequently, organizations that fail to align operational workflows risk greater exception rates, longer days sales outstanding, and strained supplier relationships.
Importantly, tariff impacts also cascade into strategic sourcing decisions: firms may accelerate supplier diversification, onshoring, or nearshoring initiatives to mitigate exposure, which in turn alters the topology of payment flows and treasury concentration risk. Therefore, treasury leaders should view tariff dynamics not as an isolated trade policy issue but as a driver of payments architecture, liquidity strategy, and cross-functional coordination.
Tailoring payment strategies through layered segmentation across transaction type, payment rails, pricing models, industries, and organization size to drive alignment
Understanding segmentation is essential for tailoring payments solutions to distinct operational and commercial needs. Based on Type, the market is studied across Cross-Border and Domestic, which requires different routing logic, FX handling, and compliance controls depending on whether transactions traverse multiple jurisdictions or remain within a single regulatory domain. Based on Payment Method, the market is studied across ACH Payments, Credit Cards, Cryptocurrency, Paper Checks, and Wire Transfers, each presenting unique cost profiles, settlement characteristics, and reconciliation demands that must align with corporate policy and liquidity targets. Based on Pricing Models, the market is studied across Subscription-Based and Transactional Fees, and these pricing architectures influence vendor selection criteria and total cost of ownership assessments by shifting incentives between predictable spend and usage-linked costs.
Continuing, based on End-User Industry, the market is studied across Banking, Financial Services, & Insurance, Energy & Utilities, Healthcare, IT & Telecom, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, and Transportation & Logistics, where sector-specific workflows, regulatory constraints, and payment volumes dictate different priorities for speed, auditability, and integration. Based on Organization Size, the market is studied across Large Enterprises and Small & Medium Enterprises, reflecting divergent resource availability, internal capabilities, and appetite for bespoke integrations versus out-of-the-box solutions. Together, these segmentation lenses illuminate how tactical choices about rails, partners, and security controls must be aligned with strategic objectives, operational realities, and the unique risk profiles of different buyer cohorts.
As a result, finance leaders should apply segmentation-driven decision frameworks to prioritize investments, ensuring that payment architectures are fit for purpose and scalable as organizational needs evolve.
Navigating corridor-specific realities across the Americas, Europe-Middle East-Africa, and Asia-Pacific to align payments architecture with regional regulatory and commercial priorities
Regional dynamics materially shape operational choices, regulatory obligations, and vendor ecosystems. In the Americas, innovation in instant payments and corporate treasury modernization is widespread, and businesses increasingly focus on liquidity optimization tools and cross-border connectivity with Latin American partners. Consequently, corporates must balance investments in speed against reconciliation complexity and prioritize partnerships that provide robust FX hedging and predictable settlement pathways. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a mosaic of regulatory regimes and interoperability initiatives that influence correspondent banking relationships and AML screening practices, making data standardization and regulatory reporting capabilities central to regional readiness.
Across Asia-Pacific, high adoption of mobile and alternative payment methods, coupled with dense trade networks, creates both opportunities for seamless integrated payables and unique compliance considerations related to cross-border data flows and local clearing requirements. Therefore, multinationals operating across these regions should design payments architectures that accommodate regional idiosyncrasies while maintaining centralized oversight. Additionally, differing regional priorities for instant settlement, open banking initiatives, and fintech ecosystem maturity mean that global program leaders must adopt a hybrid approach: combining centralized policy and risk frameworks with localized operational execution.
Ultimately, regional strategy should be informed by corridor-level analysis, regulatory monitoring, and vendor capability mapping to ensure that treasury and payments operations remain resilient, compliant, and efficient across disparate jurisdictions.
Evaluating how incumbents, fintech challengers, and orchestration vendors are reshaping vendor selection criteria through integration, transparency, and automation capabilities
Company-level dynamics reveal how competitive advantage emerges from the interplay of technology, scale, and service orchestration. Large incumbent banks continue to dominate core settlement infrastructure and provide broad access to correspondent networks, while specialized processors and fintech platforms differentiate through API-first integration, analytics, and enhanced reconciliation automation. Strategic partnerships between banks and technology providers create hybrid offerings that combine balance-sheet strength with agile product development, enabling enterprises to select solutions that balance risk management with digital experience.
At the same time, technology vendors focused on orchestration and embedded payments are pushing into segments traditionally served by banks by offering modular solutions that reduce integration friction and improve payment routing efficiency. Many large corporates are responding by consolidating vendors where possible to reduce operational complexity while investing in middle- and back-office automation to accelerate exception resolution. Furthermore, corporate treasuries are increasingly evaluating providers on the basis of interoperability, transparency of pricing, and the ability to support both traditional rails and emerging alternatives.
Therefore, executives should assess providers not only on product feature sets but also on their roadmap for standards adoption, commitment to data security, and capacity to support complex global workflows. Selecting partners with a clear vision for interoperability and a demonstrated capability to execute in regulated environments will be a differentiator over time.
Practical steps for treasury, procurement, and finance leaders to integrate systems, adopt corridor-aware strategies, and stage advanced payment capabilities for measurable wins
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic actions to strengthen payments resilience, reduce friction, and convert operational improvements into competitive advantage. First, prioritize investments that enhance integration between ERP, treasury management systems, and banking partners to reduce manual touchpoints and shorten reconciliation cycles. By doing so, organizations can improve cash visibility and reduce the frequency of exceptions that consume valuable resources. Second, adopt a corridor-aware strategy that recognizes that cross-border payments require different rails, liquidity management approaches, and compliance workflows than domestic transactions, and adjust counterparty relationships accordingly.
Additionally, implement a staged approach to advanced capabilities such as tokenization, instant settlement support, and payment orchestration, beginning with high-impact corridors and payment types. This pragmatic rollout reduces implementation risk while delivering measurable operational benefits. Simultaneously, strengthen governance by codifying policies around pricing models, supplier onboarding, and sanctions screening, and ensure these policies are digitally enforced through configurable rule engines. Finally, cultivate cross-functional collaboration among procurement, treasury, tax, and legal teams to ensure payment terms, tariff exposures, and compliance requirements are aligned with broader commercial strategy.
Taken together, these actions help organizations reduce cost-to-serve, improve supplier relationships, and maintain compliance as the payments landscape continues to evolve.
A mixed-methods research approach combining practitioner interviews, regulatory synthesis, scenario analysis, and vendor capability mapping to ensure practical, validated insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary inputs included structured interviews with treasury executives, payments product leaders, and compliance specialists across multiple industries to capture first-hand perspectives on operational pain points and strategic priorities. These conversations were complemented by secondary research, which synthesized regulatory guidance, payments network specifications, and public disclosures to contextualize primary insights and validate trends.
Analytical approaches involved mapping payment flows, exceptions, and reconciliation processes to common operational metrics, enabling comparison across organization sizes and industry verticals. Scenario analysis was applied to assess sensitivity of payment operations to policy changes and tariff shifts, and vendor capability matrices helped elucidate differentiation factors among providers. Throughout the process, data integrity protocols and triangulation methods were used to cross-verify findings and reduce bias. Finally, practitioner feedback loops were employed to ensure the final synthesis reflected operational realities and produced pragmatic recommendations that align with both strategic and tactical priorities.
This mixed-methods approach provides a balanced foundation from which executives can interpret insights and adapt them to their organization’s unique context while maintaining rigorous attention to evidence and reproducibility.
Summarizing a pragmatic path forward where integrated systems, corridor-aware tactics, and disciplined governance differentiate resilient organizations in payments
In conclusion, the B2B payments landscape is undergoing sustained transformation driven by technological innovation, regulatory change, and shifting trade dynamics, including tariff developments that affect cross-border economics. Organizations that respond by modernizing integrations, adopting corridor-aware strategies, and strengthening governance will be better positioned to capture efficiency gains while managing compliance and counterparty risk. Moreover, segmentation-based decision-making ensures solutions are tailored to the operational realities of different industries and organization sizes, enabling more effective allocation of investment dollars.
Looking ahead, the most resilient enterprises will combine strategic vision with tactical discipline: they will selectively pilot new rails and orchestration capabilities, institutionalize best practices for data and reconciliation, and align procurement and treasury incentives to support supplier relationships under changing cost conditions. By doing so, they can reduce friction, enhance visibility, and unlock working capital improvements that support broader commercial objectives. Ultimately, the ability to adapt payments architecture thoughtfully and proactively will distinguish leaders from followers in a rapidly evolving global context.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the modern B2B payments environment with a focus on resilience, interoperability, and strategic modernization for finance and treasury leaders
The B2B payments domain stands at a pivotal juncture where technological innovation, regulatory recalibration, and global trade dynamics converge to reshape how organizations move value. Amid accelerated digitization, treasuries and finance teams are under pressure to modernize legacy rails, reduce reconciliation complexity, and improve working capital efficiency while maintaining rigorous controls. This introduction sets the stage by clarifying the scope of contemporary challenges and the practical levers that business leaders can apply to meet them.
Over the past several years, shifts in customer expectations and enterprise priorities have increased the need for real-time visibility and seamless integration across ERP and banking systems. As a result, finance leaders are reprioritizing investments toward interoperability, data standardization, and vendor consolidation. Moreover, evolving compliance regimes and heightened scrutiny around AML and sanctions screening make resilience and auditability non-negotiable elements of any payments roadmap.
In light of these pressures, this analysis focuses on the intersection of operational resilience, cost-to-serve optimization, and strategic adaptability. Consequently, readers can expect a balanced perspective that synthesizes regulatory trends, payments infrastructure advances, and commercial realities to inform judicious decision-making by executives and practitioners alike.
How rapid adoption of instant rails, tokenization, and payment orchestration is reshaping cross-border flows, compliance demands, and vendor models
Transformative shifts are redefining the payments landscape across infrastructure, instruments, and governance frameworks. First, the maturation of real-time and instant payment rails has reduced settlement latency, enabling improved cash forecasting and dynamic working capital strategies. At the same time, tokenization and advanced authentication reduce fraud exposure while adding layers of complexity for legacy reconciliation processes. Consequently, organisations must reconcile gains in speed and security with the operational demands of integration and exception handling.
Simultaneously, cross-border payments are undergoing structural change driven by new clearing models, regulatory harmonization efforts, and the increasing adoption of alternative rails such as ledger-based settlement systems. These developments are lowering some traditional frictions but also introducing new interoperability challenges that require institutions to redesign correspondent relationships and vendor arrangements. Furthermore, payment orchestration platforms and embedded finance solutions are accelerating the digitization of payment experiences, enabling software vendors and marketplaces to offer native payment flows that blur the lines between banking and commerce.
Finally, the regulatory environment is evolving with greater emphasis on transparency, data protection, and AML controls. This trend compels organizations to prioritize robust governance, invest in analytics for anomaly detection, and adopt flexible pricing models. Taken together, these shifts create both opportunities for competitive differentiation and responsibilities to manage technological and compliance complexity proactively.
Assessing how United States tariff adjustments for 2025 will influence payment timing, supplier negotiations, and treasury responses across global trade corridors
United States tariff changes announced for 2025 create a new layer of complexity for B2B payments by altering cost structures across global supply chains and injecting volatility into cross-border settlement priorities. As tariff adjustments affect landed costs and supplier margins, procurement and finance teams must revisit payment terms, working capital strategies, and currency hedging approaches. In practice, this means more frequent renegotiation of payment schedules and increased attention to payment timing as a lever to manage cash flow under shifting cost assumptions.
Moreover, tariff-driven shifts tend to concentrate risk on trade corridors most affected by rate changes, prompting firms to reassess their correspondent banking networks and to evaluate alternative payment rails that offer more predictable settlement mechanics. In addition, the administrative burden associated with compliance documentation, customs reconciliation, and tariff classification intensifies, requiring tighter integration between ERP systems, trade compliance platforms, and payments operations. Consequently, organizations that fail to align operational workflows risk greater exception rates, longer days sales outstanding, and strained supplier relationships.
Importantly, tariff impacts also cascade into strategic sourcing decisions: firms may accelerate supplier diversification, onshoring, or nearshoring initiatives to mitigate exposure, which in turn alters the topology of payment flows and treasury concentration risk. Therefore, treasury leaders should view tariff dynamics not as an isolated trade policy issue but as a driver of payments architecture, liquidity strategy, and cross-functional coordination.
Tailoring payment strategies through layered segmentation across transaction type, payment rails, pricing models, industries, and organization size to drive alignment
Understanding segmentation is essential for tailoring payments solutions to distinct operational and commercial needs. Based on Type, the market is studied across Cross-Border and Domestic, which requires different routing logic, FX handling, and compliance controls depending on whether transactions traverse multiple jurisdictions or remain within a single regulatory domain. Based on Payment Method, the market is studied across ACH Payments, Credit Cards, Cryptocurrency, Paper Checks, and Wire Transfers, each presenting unique cost profiles, settlement characteristics, and reconciliation demands that must align with corporate policy and liquidity targets. Based on Pricing Models, the market is studied across Subscription-Based and Transactional Fees, and these pricing architectures influence vendor selection criteria and total cost of ownership assessments by shifting incentives between predictable spend and usage-linked costs.
Continuing, based on End-User Industry, the market is studied across Banking, Financial Services, & Insurance, Energy & Utilities, Healthcare, IT & Telecom, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, and Transportation & Logistics, where sector-specific workflows, regulatory constraints, and payment volumes dictate different priorities for speed, auditability, and integration. Based on Organization Size, the market is studied across Large Enterprises and Small & Medium Enterprises, reflecting divergent resource availability, internal capabilities, and appetite for bespoke integrations versus out-of-the-box solutions. Together, these segmentation lenses illuminate how tactical choices about rails, partners, and security controls must be aligned with strategic objectives, operational realities, and the unique risk profiles of different buyer cohorts.
As a result, finance leaders should apply segmentation-driven decision frameworks to prioritize investments, ensuring that payment architectures are fit for purpose and scalable as organizational needs evolve.
Navigating corridor-specific realities across the Americas, Europe-Middle East-Africa, and Asia-Pacific to align payments architecture with regional regulatory and commercial priorities
Regional dynamics materially shape operational choices, regulatory obligations, and vendor ecosystems. In the Americas, innovation in instant payments and corporate treasury modernization is widespread, and businesses increasingly focus on liquidity optimization tools and cross-border connectivity with Latin American partners. Consequently, corporates must balance investments in speed against reconciliation complexity and prioritize partnerships that provide robust FX hedging and predictable settlement pathways. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a mosaic of regulatory regimes and interoperability initiatives that influence correspondent banking relationships and AML screening practices, making data standardization and regulatory reporting capabilities central to regional readiness.
Across Asia-Pacific, high adoption of mobile and alternative payment methods, coupled with dense trade networks, creates both opportunities for seamless integrated payables and unique compliance considerations related to cross-border data flows and local clearing requirements. Therefore, multinationals operating across these regions should design payments architectures that accommodate regional idiosyncrasies while maintaining centralized oversight. Additionally, differing regional priorities for instant settlement, open banking initiatives, and fintech ecosystem maturity mean that global program leaders must adopt a hybrid approach: combining centralized policy and risk frameworks with localized operational execution.
Ultimately, regional strategy should be informed by corridor-level analysis, regulatory monitoring, and vendor capability mapping to ensure that treasury and payments operations remain resilient, compliant, and efficient across disparate jurisdictions.
Evaluating how incumbents, fintech challengers, and orchestration vendors are reshaping vendor selection criteria through integration, transparency, and automation capabilities
Company-level dynamics reveal how competitive advantage emerges from the interplay of technology, scale, and service orchestration. Large incumbent banks continue to dominate core settlement infrastructure and provide broad access to correspondent networks, while specialized processors and fintech platforms differentiate through API-first integration, analytics, and enhanced reconciliation automation. Strategic partnerships between banks and technology providers create hybrid offerings that combine balance-sheet strength with agile product development, enabling enterprises to select solutions that balance risk management with digital experience.
At the same time, technology vendors focused on orchestration and embedded payments are pushing into segments traditionally served by banks by offering modular solutions that reduce integration friction and improve payment routing efficiency. Many large corporates are responding by consolidating vendors where possible to reduce operational complexity while investing in middle- and back-office automation to accelerate exception resolution. Furthermore, corporate treasuries are increasingly evaluating providers on the basis of interoperability, transparency of pricing, and the ability to support both traditional rails and emerging alternatives.
Therefore, executives should assess providers not only on product feature sets but also on their roadmap for standards adoption, commitment to data security, and capacity to support complex global workflows. Selecting partners with a clear vision for interoperability and a demonstrated capability to execute in regulated environments will be a differentiator over time.
Practical steps for treasury, procurement, and finance leaders to integrate systems, adopt corridor-aware strategies, and stage advanced payment capabilities for measurable wins
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic actions to strengthen payments resilience, reduce friction, and convert operational improvements into competitive advantage. First, prioritize investments that enhance integration between ERP, treasury management systems, and banking partners to reduce manual touchpoints and shorten reconciliation cycles. By doing so, organizations can improve cash visibility and reduce the frequency of exceptions that consume valuable resources. Second, adopt a corridor-aware strategy that recognizes that cross-border payments require different rails, liquidity management approaches, and compliance workflows than domestic transactions, and adjust counterparty relationships accordingly.
Additionally, implement a staged approach to advanced capabilities such as tokenization, instant settlement support, and payment orchestration, beginning with high-impact corridors and payment types. This pragmatic rollout reduces implementation risk while delivering measurable operational benefits. Simultaneously, strengthen governance by codifying policies around pricing models, supplier onboarding, and sanctions screening, and ensure these policies are digitally enforced through configurable rule engines. Finally, cultivate cross-functional collaboration among procurement, treasury, tax, and legal teams to ensure payment terms, tariff exposures, and compliance requirements are aligned with broader commercial strategy.
Taken together, these actions help organizations reduce cost-to-serve, improve supplier relationships, and maintain compliance as the payments landscape continues to evolve.
A mixed-methods research approach combining practitioner interviews, regulatory synthesis, scenario analysis, and vendor capability mapping to ensure practical, validated insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary inputs included structured interviews with treasury executives, payments product leaders, and compliance specialists across multiple industries to capture first-hand perspectives on operational pain points and strategic priorities. These conversations were complemented by secondary research, which synthesized regulatory guidance, payments network specifications, and public disclosures to contextualize primary insights and validate trends.
Analytical approaches involved mapping payment flows, exceptions, and reconciliation processes to common operational metrics, enabling comparison across organization sizes and industry verticals. Scenario analysis was applied to assess sensitivity of payment operations to policy changes and tariff shifts, and vendor capability matrices helped elucidate differentiation factors among providers. Throughout the process, data integrity protocols and triangulation methods were used to cross-verify findings and reduce bias. Finally, practitioner feedback loops were employed to ensure the final synthesis reflected operational realities and produced pragmatic recommendations that align with both strategic and tactical priorities.
This mixed-methods approach provides a balanced foundation from which executives can interpret insights and adapt them to their organization’s unique context while maintaining rigorous attention to evidence and reproducibility.
Summarizing a pragmatic path forward where integrated systems, corridor-aware tactics, and disciplined governance differentiate resilient organizations in payments
In conclusion, the B2B payments landscape is undergoing sustained transformation driven by technological innovation, regulatory change, and shifting trade dynamics, including tariff developments that affect cross-border economics. Organizations that respond by modernizing integrations, adopting corridor-aware strategies, and strengthening governance will be better positioned to capture efficiency gains while managing compliance and counterparty risk. Moreover, segmentation-based decision-making ensures solutions are tailored to the operational realities of different industries and organization sizes, enabling more effective allocation of investment dollars.
Looking ahead, the most resilient enterprises will combine strategic vision with tactical discipline: they will selectively pilot new rails and orchestration capabilities, institutionalize best practices for data and reconciliation, and align procurement and treasury incentives to support supplier relationships under changing cost conditions. By doing so, they can reduce friction, enhance visibility, and unlock working capital improvements that support broader commercial objectives. Ultimately, the ability to adapt payments architecture thoughtfully and proactively will distinguish leaders from followers in a rapidly evolving global context.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of embedded finance APIs to streamline corporate payment workflows across multiple platforms
- 5.2. Expansion of cross-border payment networks leveraging blockchain for real-time settlement and transparency
- 5.3. Integration of AI-driven invoice processing to automate accounts payable and reduce manual errors
- 5.4. Emergence of dynamic discounting platforms offering real-time risk-based early payment incentives
- 5.5. Evolution of payment orchestration layers to centralize multi-currency transaction routing and optimization
- 5.6. Increasing demand for cybersecurity solutions in B2B payment portals to prevent fraud and data breaches
- 5.7. Development of tokenization standards for secure B2B card-not-present transactions and digital wallets
- 5.8. Growth of SaaS-based procure-to-pay platforms embedding payment modules for end-to-end financial visibility
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. B2B Payments Market, by Type
- 8.1. Cross-Border
- 8.2. Domestic
- 9. B2B Payments Market, by Payment Method
- 9.1. ACH Payments
- 9.2. Credit Cards
- 9.3. Cryptocurrency
- 9.4. Paper Checks
- 9.5. Wire Transfers
- 10. B2B Payments Market, by Organization Size
- 10.1. Large Enterprises
- 10.2. Small & Medium Enterprises
- 11. B2B Payments Market, by End-User Industry
- 11.1. Banking, Financial Services, & Insurance
- 11.2. Energy & Utilities
- 11.3. Healthcare
- 11.4. IT & Telecom
- 11.5. Manufacturing
- 11.6. Retail & E-commerce
- 11.7. Transportation & Logistics
- 12. B2B Payments Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. B2B Payments Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. B2B Payments Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Adyen N.V.
- 15.3.2. American Express Company
- 15.3.3. Bank of America Corporation
- 15.3.4. Bottomline Technologies Inc.
- 15.3.5. Capital One Financial Corporation
- 15.3.6. Citigroup Inc.
- 15.3.7. Coupa Software Inc.
- 15.3.8. Edenred Payment Solutions
- 15.3.9. FIS Global
- 15.3.10. Flywire Corporation
- 15.3.11. HighRadius Corporation
- 15.3.12. Mastercard Inc.
- 15.3.13. Nuvei Corporation
- 15.3.14. Payoneer Inc.
- 15.3.15. PayPal Holdings, Inc.
- 15.3.16. Paystand, Inc.
- 15.3.17. Ramp Business Corporation
- 15.3.18. Rapyd Financial Network Ltd.
- 15.3.19. Slope Inc.
- 15.3.20. Square Payments by Block Inc.
- 15.3.21. Stripe, Inc.
- 15.3.22. Tipalti Inc.
- 15.3.23. Two AS
- 15.3.24. U.S. Bank
- 15.3.25. Visa Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
