Aviation Weather Radar System Market by Type (Airborne Radar, Ground Radar), Component (Antennas, Duplexer, Processors), Radar Range, Frequency Band, Distribution Channel, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Aviation Weather Radar System Market was valued at USD 323.67 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 349.85 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.44%, reaching USD 619.13 million by 2032.
A strategic orientation to aviation weather radar evolution driven by safety priorities technological modernization and interoperable system design for resilient operations
The aviation weather radar domain sits at the intersection of safety imperatives, avionics modernization, and resilient supply chains, underpinning safe operations across civil and military flight envelopes. Recent advances in antenna design, digital signal processing, and solid-state transmitter technology have elevated the role of radar systems from passive detectors to proactive enablers of flight planning, turbulence avoidance, and airspace deconfliction. As weather volatility increases and air traffic density rises, operators require systems that offer higher fidelity returns, lower false-alarm rates, and seamless integration with cockpit displays and ground operations centers.
Consequently, stakeholders now prioritize interoperability with flight management systems, reliability under extreme environmental conditions, and modular maintainability to reduce lifecycle costs. In tandem, regulatory bodies and air navigation service providers emphasize standardized data formats and certification pathways that accelerate fielding while preserving safety margins. Therefore, decision-makers must reconcile short-term upgrade cycles with longer-term architectural choices that support dual-band operation, enhanced processing capabilities, and component-level redundancy. Ultimately, the industry’s evolution will be driven by solutions that deliver actionable weather intelligence to crews and networked air traffic systems with demonstrable gains in operational resilience and passenger safety.
How the aviation weather radar domain is being redefined by solid-state transformations digital beamforming adaptive algorithms and supply chain resilience imperatives
The landscape for aviation weather radar is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging technological and operational forces. First, the migration from legacy magnetron-based transmitters toward solid-state and gallium nitride-enabled transmitters is raising system reliability and reducing maintenance overhead, which in turn alters aftermarket demand and life-cycle support practices. In addition, the rapid adoption of digital beamforming and active electronically scanned arrays enables finer spatial resolution and adaptive clutter suppression, enhancing detection of convective cells and microbursts in challenging conditions.
Furthermore, software-defined radar architectures are enabling over-the-air updates and algorithmic improvements without full hardware replacement, which extends useful life and aligns product roadmaps with evolving certification requirements. At the same time, advances in machine learning and probabilistic nowcasting are shifting how radar-derived data is consumed by flight crews and automated decision-support tools, pushing analytics closer to the edge within airborne platforms. Finally, supply chain reconfiguration and increased scrutiny of component provenance are prompting greater vertical integration and strategic partnerships, ensuring that systems remain resilient to geopolitical and trade disruptions while meeting demanding performance expectations.
Assessing procurement reshaping and sourcing resilience in response to cumulative tariff adjustments and trade policy changes affecting critical radar components
The cumulative impact of tariff adjustments and trade policy changes announced in 2025 is reshaping procurement strategies and supplier selection across the aviation weather radar supply chain. Increased duties on certain electronic components and subassemblies have amplified the cost sensitivity of systems that rely on specialized antennas, duplexers, and high-performance transmitters, thereby incentivizing buyers to reassess supplier portfolios and to accelerate localization of manufacturing where feasible. As a result, original equipment manufacturers and tier-one suppliers are re-evaluating sourcing strategies to reduce exposure to tariff volatility and to preserve lead-time integrity for critical component deliveries.
Concurrently, procurement teams have heightened their focus on compliance documentation, rules-of-origin certification, and tariff-engineering approaches that lawfully mitigate duty impacts. These measures include qualifying alternate component suppliers across multiple jurisdictions and instituting longer-term supply agreements that incorporate tariff pass-through clauses and hedging provisions. In practical terms, programs that depend on imported processors or specialized antennas may experience extended qualification timelines as suppliers adapt to new duty structures and reconfigure their logistics models. Therefore, program managers and procurement leads should treat tariff-related adjustments as structural considerations when planning upgrades, retrofit cycles, and new platform integrations, and they should prioritize contractual mechanisms that preserve delivery certainty and cost transparency.
Actionable segmentation insights that align type component frequency range distribution channels and application profiles to product strategy and sustainment planning
Segmentation-driven insight illuminates where technological and commercial levers intersect, enabling targeted strategy across product families and value-chain stages. Based on Type, distinctions between Airborne Radar and Ground Radar determine system form factors, certification pathways, and operational integration requirements because airborne systems prioritize weight, size, and ventilation constraints while ground installations focus on endurance and networked coverage. Based on Component, attention to Antennas, Duplexer, Processors, Receiver, and Transmitters highlights differential aftermarket and sustainment priorities, since antennas and transmitters often dictate detection range and polarization performance whereas processors and receivers shape data fidelity and latency.
Based on Radar Range, distinctions among Long Range, Medium Range, and Short Range guide product placement and mission fit: long-range systems support en route and terminal surveillance, medium-range solutions enable terminal approach and tactical situational awareness, and short-range radars emphasize low-altitude hazard detection and terminal surface movement monitoring. Based on Frequency Band, the trade-offs between C Band and X Band inform choices related to precipitation attenuation, resolution, and spectrum coordination, driving design decisions for multi-band or dual-band systems. Based on Distribution Channel, the split between Offline Retail and Online Retail influences service models and aftermarket logistics, particularly for spare parts and software license distribution. Based on Application, differentiation between Civil Aviation and Military Aviation, with Civil Aviation further segmented into Cargo Airliners, Commercial Airlines, and Private Aircraft, reveals divergent procurement cycles, certification complexity, and total ownership considerations, thereby informing commercialization and go-to-market tactics.
Regional deployment patterns and capability priorities across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia-Pacific that determine procurement and support strategies
Regional dynamics are reshaping demand patterns and supply-chain configurations, and understanding geographic nuance is essential for effective deployment and service planning. In the Americas, the emphasis on retrofits, airspace modernization, and long-haul commercial operations drives demand for systems optimized for integration with national air traffic management infrastructures and for durable field support models. Regulatory harmonization initiatives and investment in radar-based weather products further influence procurement priorities and aftermarket stocking strategies in this region.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, heterogeneous airspace governance and a mix of legacy and modern fleets create opportunities for both ground-based upgrades and airborne retrofits, while defense modernization programs in several countries stimulate demand for military-grade, dual-use radar capabilities. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid fleet growth, dense terminal environments, and aggressive infrastructure investment catalyze adoption of high-resolution radars, frequent system refresh cycles, and regional manufacturing investments. Together, these geographic forces suggest that suppliers must tailor product portfolios, certification support, and commercial terms to regional regulatory frameworks, logistics realities, and differential maintenance practices to capture sustained operational value.
Competitive imperatives focusing on modular architectures aftermarket resilience strategic partnerships and platform-level cybersecurity to secure long-term program advantages
Competitive dynamics in the aviation weather radar arena center on technological differentiation, lifecycle support, and strategic partnerships that extend beyond single-product sales. Leading firms emphasize modular architectures to facilitate incremental upgrades, invest in dual-band and software-defined capabilities to broaden platform applicability, and strengthen aftermarket service offerings to lock in long-term revenue streams. In addition, many vendors pursue interoperability certifications and open-data initiatives that enable cross-vendor integration with traffic management systems, enhancing value for airline and air navigation service provider customers.
Strategic collaborations and supplier ecosystems are emerging as pivotal elements of competitive advantage, particularly around components such as high-power transmitters, advanced antennas, and low-latency processors. Firms that secure resilient component sources and cultivate regional manufacturing or assembly footprints gain a relative edge in pricing stability and lead-time management. Moreover, a growing emphasis on cyber-resilience and data integrity is prompting vendors to embed security-by-design principles in both airborne and ground platforms. As a consequence, corporate strategies that combine product innovation, services engineering, and supply-chain diversification will be best positioned to meet evolving customer requirements and to mitigate operational disruptions.
Practical recommendations for leaders to fortify product roadmaps procurement resilience and aftermarket support while accelerating certification and deployment timelines
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that align product development, procurement strategy, and service delivery to current operational realities. First, invest in solid-state transmitter technologies and processor upgrades to enhance system reliability and to shorten maintenance windows, while simultaneously designing modular upgrade paths that allow field retrofits without full-system replacement. Second, diversify supplier bases for critical elements such as antennas, duplexers, and transmitters and formalize multi-jurisdictional supply agreements to reduce exposure to trade policy shocks and tariff impacts.
Third, prioritize dual-band capability and software-defined functions that extend system utility across varying weather conditions and mission profiles, and integrate machine learning-based analytics into the data pipeline to support predictive maintenance and improved threat discrimination. Fourth, strengthen aftermarket and field-support propositions by establishing regional service hubs, extended warranty programs, and remote diagnostics to minimize aircraft downtime. Finally, develop certification roadmaps in parallel with product development to accelerate time-to-deployment and to lower integration risk; by aligning engineering, compliance, and commercial teams early, organizations can convert technical differentiation into tangible procurement wins.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach combining expert engagements technical validation and supply-chain scrutiny to derive robust actionable insights
This analysis synthesizes insights obtained through a mixed-methods approach that combines primary engagement with subject-matter experts, technical program managers, procurement officers, and systems engineers alongside rigorous secondary research into industry standards, regulatory guidance, and open-source technical literature. Primary engagements included structured interviews and validation workshops designed to test component-level assumptions, integration constraints, and sustainment priorities under realistic operational scenarios. Secondary materials were triangulated to corroborate trends in transmitter technologies, antenna innovations, signal processing advances, and the evolving role of algorithms in radar-derived weather intelligence.
Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-validation of qualitative inputs with technical specifications, vendor public disclosures, and documented certification pathways. Supply-chain risk assessments incorporated publicly available trade and tariff notices, logistics flow analyses, and supplier concentration metrics to highlight potential vulnerabilities. Throughout the methodology, an emphasis on transparency and traceability guided the treatment of data sources, and scenarios were developed to reflect plausible procurement responses to regulatory and policy shifts rather than speculative sizing exercises.
Concluding perspective on enabling resilient aviation weather radar capabilities through integrated technology strategy supply-chain discipline and certification alignment
The aviation weather radar sector stands at a pivotal moment where technological advances, regulatory emphasis on interoperability, and geopolitical trade considerations converge to shape procurement and development strategies. As systems transition toward solid-state transmitters, digital beamforming, and software-defined architectures, stakeholders gain pathways to higher fidelity weather awareness, reduced maintenance burdens, and enhanced operational safety. Yet, these gains require intentional investments in component sourcing diversity, certification-aligned engineering, and aftermarket capabilities to translate technical promise into operational reliability.
Looking ahead, success will favor organizations that embed flexibility into product architectures, that cultivate regional service footprints aligned with fleet geographies, and that adopt procurement contracts which mitigate tariff-related exposure. By harmonizing engineering priorities with procurement discipline and regulatory foresight, program owners and suppliers can accelerate the deployment of resilient, high-performance weather radar capabilities that materially improve situational awareness and safety across civil and military aviation domains.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic orientation to aviation weather radar evolution driven by safety priorities technological modernization and interoperable system design for resilient operations
The aviation weather radar domain sits at the intersection of safety imperatives, avionics modernization, and resilient supply chains, underpinning safe operations across civil and military flight envelopes. Recent advances in antenna design, digital signal processing, and solid-state transmitter technology have elevated the role of radar systems from passive detectors to proactive enablers of flight planning, turbulence avoidance, and airspace deconfliction. As weather volatility increases and air traffic density rises, operators require systems that offer higher fidelity returns, lower false-alarm rates, and seamless integration with cockpit displays and ground operations centers.
Consequently, stakeholders now prioritize interoperability with flight management systems, reliability under extreme environmental conditions, and modular maintainability to reduce lifecycle costs. In tandem, regulatory bodies and air navigation service providers emphasize standardized data formats and certification pathways that accelerate fielding while preserving safety margins. Therefore, decision-makers must reconcile short-term upgrade cycles with longer-term architectural choices that support dual-band operation, enhanced processing capabilities, and component-level redundancy. Ultimately, the industry’s evolution will be driven by solutions that deliver actionable weather intelligence to crews and networked air traffic systems with demonstrable gains in operational resilience and passenger safety.
How the aviation weather radar domain is being redefined by solid-state transformations digital beamforming adaptive algorithms and supply chain resilience imperatives
The landscape for aviation weather radar is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging technological and operational forces. First, the migration from legacy magnetron-based transmitters toward solid-state and gallium nitride-enabled transmitters is raising system reliability and reducing maintenance overhead, which in turn alters aftermarket demand and life-cycle support practices. In addition, the rapid adoption of digital beamforming and active electronically scanned arrays enables finer spatial resolution and adaptive clutter suppression, enhancing detection of convective cells and microbursts in challenging conditions.
Furthermore, software-defined radar architectures are enabling over-the-air updates and algorithmic improvements without full hardware replacement, which extends useful life and aligns product roadmaps with evolving certification requirements. At the same time, advances in machine learning and probabilistic nowcasting are shifting how radar-derived data is consumed by flight crews and automated decision-support tools, pushing analytics closer to the edge within airborne platforms. Finally, supply chain reconfiguration and increased scrutiny of component provenance are prompting greater vertical integration and strategic partnerships, ensuring that systems remain resilient to geopolitical and trade disruptions while meeting demanding performance expectations.
Assessing procurement reshaping and sourcing resilience in response to cumulative tariff adjustments and trade policy changes affecting critical radar components
The cumulative impact of tariff adjustments and trade policy changes announced in 2025 is reshaping procurement strategies and supplier selection across the aviation weather radar supply chain. Increased duties on certain electronic components and subassemblies have amplified the cost sensitivity of systems that rely on specialized antennas, duplexers, and high-performance transmitters, thereby incentivizing buyers to reassess supplier portfolios and to accelerate localization of manufacturing where feasible. As a result, original equipment manufacturers and tier-one suppliers are re-evaluating sourcing strategies to reduce exposure to tariff volatility and to preserve lead-time integrity for critical component deliveries.
Concurrently, procurement teams have heightened their focus on compliance documentation, rules-of-origin certification, and tariff-engineering approaches that lawfully mitigate duty impacts. These measures include qualifying alternate component suppliers across multiple jurisdictions and instituting longer-term supply agreements that incorporate tariff pass-through clauses and hedging provisions. In practical terms, programs that depend on imported processors or specialized antennas may experience extended qualification timelines as suppliers adapt to new duty structures and reconfigure their logistics models. Therefore, program managers and procurement leads should treat tariff-related adjustments as structural considerations when planning upgrades, retrofit cycles, and new platform integrations, and they should prioritize contractual mechanisms that preserve delivery certainty and cost transparency.
Actionable segmentation insights that align type component frequency range distribution channels and application profiles to product strategy and sustainment planning
Segmentation-driven insight illuminates where technological and commercial levers intersect, enabling targeted strategy across product families and value-chain stages. Based on Type, distinctions between Airborne Radar and Ground Radar determine system form factors, certification pathways, and operational integration requirements because airborne systems prioritize weight, size, and ventilation constraints while ground installations focus on endurance and networked coverage. Based on Component, attention to Antennas, Duplexer, Processors, Receiver, and Transmitters highlights differential aftermarket and sustainment priorities, since antennas and transmitters often dictate detection range and polarization performance whereas processors and receivers shape data fidelity and latency.
Based on Radar Range, distinctions among Long Range, Medium Range, and Short Range guide product placement and mission fit: long-range systems support en route and terminal surveillance, medium-range solutions enable terminal approach and tactical situational awareness, and short-range radars emphasize low-altitude hazard detection and terminal surface movement monitoring. Based on Frequency Band, the trade-offs between C Band and X Band inform choices related to precipitation attenuation, resolution, and spectrum coordination, driving design decisions for multi-band or dual-band systems. Based on Distribution Channel, the split between Offline Retail and Online Retail influences service models and aftermarket logistics, particularly for spare parts and software license distribution. Based on Application, differentiation between Civil Aviation and Military Aviation, with Civil Aviation further segmented into Cargo Airliners, Commercial Airlines, and Private Aircraft, reveals divergent procurement cycles, certification complexity, and total ownership considerations, thereby informing commercialization and go-to-market tactics.
Regional deployment patterns and capability priorities across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia-Pacific that determine procurement and support strategies
Regional dynamics are reshaping demand patterns and supply-chain configurations, and understanding geographic nuance is essential for effective deployment and service planning. In the Americas, the emphasis on retrofits, airspace modernization, and long-haul commercial operations drives demand for systems optimized for integration with national air traffic management infrastructures and for durable field support models. Regulatory harmonization initiatives and investment in radar-based weather products further influence procurement priorities and aftermarket stocking strategies in this region.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, heterogeneous airspace governance and a mix of legacy and modern fleets create opportunities for both ground-based upgrades and airborne retrofits, while defense modernization programs in several countries stimulate demand for military-grade, dual-use radar capabilities. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid fleet growth, dense terminal environments, and aggressive infrastructure investment catalyze adoption of high-resolution radars, frequent system refresh cycles, and regional manufacturing investments. Together, these geographic forces suggest that suppliers must tailor product portfolios, certification support, and commercial terms to regional regulatory frameworks, logistics realities, and differential maintenance practices to capture sustained operational value.
Competitive imperatives focusing on modular architectures aftermarket resilience strategic partnerships and platform-level cybersecurity to secure long-term program advantages
Competitive dynamics in the aviation weather radar arena center on technological differentiation, lifecycle support, and strategic partnerships that extend beyond single-product sales. Leading firms emphasize modular architectures to facilitate incremental upgrades, invest in dual-band and software-defined capabilities to broaden platform applicability, and strengthen aftermarket service offerings to lock in long-term revenue streams. In addition, many vendors pursue interoperability certifications and open-data initiatives that enable cross-vendor integration with traffic management systems, enhancing value for airline and air navigation service provider customers.
Strategic collaborations and supplier ecosystems are emerging as pivotal elements of competitive advantage, particularly around components such as high-power transmitters, advanced antennas, and low-latency processors. Firms that secure resilient component sources and cultivate regional manufacturing or assembly footprints gain a relative edge in pricing stability and lead-time management. Moreover, a growing emphasis on cyber-resilience and data integrity is prompting vendors to embed security-by-design principles in both airborne and ground platforms. As a consequence, corporate strategies that combine product innovation, services engineering, and supply-chain diversification will be best positioned to meet evolving customer requirements and to mitigate operational disruptions.
Practical recommendations for leaders to fortify product roadmaps procurement resilience and aftermarket support while accelerating certification and deployment timelines
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that align product development, procurement strategy, and service delivery to current operational realities. First, invest in solid-state transmitter technologies and processor upgrades to enhance system reliability and to shorten maintenance windows, while simultaneously designing modular upgrade paths that allow field retrofits without full-system replacement. Second, diversify supplier bases for critical elements such as antennas, duplexers, and transmitters and formalize multi-jurisdictional supply agreements to reduce exposure to trade policy shocks and tariff impacts.
Third, prioritize dual-band capability and software-defined functions that extend system utility across varying weather conditions and mission profiles, and integrate machine learning-based analytics into the data pipeline to support predictive maintenance and improved threat discrimination. Fourth, strengthen aftermarket and field-support propositions by establishing regional service hubs, extended warranty programs, and remote diagnostics to minimize aircraft downtime. Finally, develop certification roadmaps in parallel with product development to accelerate time-to-deployment and to lower integration risk; by aligning engineering, compliance, and commercial teams early, organizations can convert technical differentiation into tangible procurement wins.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach combining expert engagements technical validation and supply-chain scrutiny to derive robust actionable insights
This analysis synthesizes insights obtained through a mixed-methods approach that combines primary engagement with subject-matter experts, technical program managers, procurement officers, and systems engineers alongside rigorous secondary research into industry standards, regulatory guidance, and open-source technical literature. Primary engagements included structured interviews and validation workshops designed to test component-level assumptions, integration constraints, and sustainment priorities under realistic operational scenarios. Secondary materials were triangulated to corroborate trends in transmitter technologies, antenna innovations, signal processing advances, and the evolving role of algorithms in radar-derived weather intelligence.
Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-validation of qualitative inputs with technical specifications, vendor public disclosures, and documented certification pathways. Supply-chain risk assessments incorporated publicly available trade and tariff notices, logistics flow analyses, and supplier concentration metrics to highlight potential vulnerabilities. Throughout the methodology, an emphasis on transparency and traceability guided the treatment of data sources, and scenarios were developed to reflect plausible procurement responses to regulatory and policy shifts rather than speculative sizing exercises.
Concluding perspective on enabling resilient aviation weather radar capabilities through integrated technology strategy supply-chain discipline and certification alignment
The aviation weather radar sector stands at a pivotal moment where technological advances, regulatory emphasis on interoperability, and geopolitical trade considerations converge to shape procurement and development strategies. As systems transition toward solid-state transmitters, digital beamforming, and software-defined architectures, stakeholders gain pathways to higher fidelity weather awareness, reduced maintenance burdens, and enhanced operational safety. Yet, these gains require intentional investments in component sourcing diversity, certification-aligned engineering, and aftermarket capabilities to translate technical promise into operational reliability.
Looking ahead, success will favor organizations that embed flexibility into product architectures, that cultivate regional service footprints aligned with fleet geographies, and that adopt procurement contracts which mitigate tariff-related exposure. By harmonizing engineering priorities with procurement discipline and regulatory foresight, program owners and suppliers can accelerate the deployment of resilient, high-performance weather radar capabilities that materially improve situational awareness and safety across civil and military aviation domains.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence algorithms for predictive turbulence detection and avoidance in modern onboard weather radars
- 5.2. Adoption of solid-state phased array technology to enhance reliability and reduce maintenance costs for weather radar systems on commercial aircraft
- 5.3. Implementation of satellite-linked real-time weather data fusion to improve situational awareness and flight safety across all altitudes
- 5.4. Development of miniaturized lightweight radar modules tailored for unmanned aerial vehicles and urban air mobility platforms
- 5.5. Rising demand for advanced multifunctional avionics suites integrating weather radar with synthetic vision and terrain awareness sensors
- 5.6. Growth of demand for portable ground-based weather radar units enabling rapid deployment for field meteorological research and disaster response
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Aviation Weather Radar System Market, by Type
- 8.1. Airborne Radar
- 8.2. Ground Radar
- 9. Aviation Weather Radar System Market, by Component
- 9.1. Antennas
- 9.2. Duplexer
- 9.3. Processors
- 9.4. Reciever
- 9.5. Transmitters
- 10. Aviation Weather Radar System Market, by Radar Range
- 10.1. Long Range
- 10.2. Medium Range
- 10.3. Short Range
- 11. Aviation Weather Radar System Market, by Frequency Band
- 11.1. C Band
- 11.2. X Band
- 12. Aviation Weather Radar System Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Offline Retail
- 12.2. Online Retail
- 13. Aviation Weather Radar System Market, by Application
- 13.1. Civil Aviation
- 13.1.1. Cargo Airliners
- 13.1.2. Commercial Airlines
- 13.1.3. Private Aircraft
- 13.2. Military Aviation
- 14. Aviation Weather Radar System Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Aviation Weather Radar System Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Aviation Weather Radar System Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Aerodata AG
- 17.3.2. Airbus SE
- 17.3.3. BAE Systems PLC
- 17.3.4. Baron Weather, Inc.
- 17.3.5. Elbit Systems Ltd.
- 17.3.6. Enterprise Electronics Corporation
- 17.3.7. EWR Radar Systems, Inc.
- 17.3.8. GAMIC GmbH
- 17.3.9. General Dynamics Corp.
- 17.3.10. Hensoldt AG
- 17.3.11. Honeywell International Inc.
- 17.3.12. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
- 17.3.13. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
- 17.3.14. L3Harris Technologies Inc.
- 17.3.15. Leonardo S.p.A
- 17.3.16. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 17.3.17. Northrop Grumman Corp.
- 17.3.18. Raytheon Technologies Corp.
- 17.3.19. Saab AB
- 17.3.20. Teledyne FLIR LLC
- 17.3.21. Terma A/S
- 17.3.22. Thales Group
- 17.3.23. The Boeing Company
- 17.3.24. Toshiba Infrastructure Systems & Solutions Corporation
- 17.3.25. Vaisala Oyj
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
