Aviation MRO Logistics Market by Logistics Type (Distribution Management, Inventory Management, Packaging & Kitting), Maintenance Type (Base Maintenance, Component Maintenance, Engine Maintenance), Operation Type, Transport Mode, End-User - Global Forecas
Description
The Aviation MRO Logistics Market was valued at USD 18.60 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 21.85 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 17.80%, reaching USD 69.00 billion by 2032.
An incisive overview of current aviation MRO logistics dynamics revealing the operational pressures and strategic priorities shaping parts movement, traceability, and service reliability
The aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul logistics domain is undergoing a fundamental evolution driven by increasing complexity of fleet architectures, tighter maintenance windows, and intensified scrutiny on operational resilience. Supply chains that once prioritized lowest landed cost now balance cost with agility and traceability, while MRO operators face rising expectations for parts availability, rapid turnarounds, and certified handling across global networks. As stakeholders demand higher levels of visibility and compliance, logistics managers must adopt integrated processes that reduce risk without compromising throughput.
Consequently, cross-functional collaboration between procurement, planning, and technical operations has become essential. Digital enablers, including inventory digitization and advanced transportation analytics, are reshaping how parts are sourced, moved, and consumed. At the same time, regulatory frameworks and customer expectations put a premium on validated provenance and secure chain-of-custody practices. These dynamics set the stage for organizations to reevaluate partnerships, invest in modular logistics capabilities, and prioritize investments that deliver traceable reliability in addition to cost efficiency.
How digitalization, resilience strategies, sustainability priorities, and regulatory harmonization are converging to reshape aviation MRO logistics operations and partnerships
Over recent years, several transformative shifts have redefined how aviation MRO logistics creates value and mitigates risk. First, digitalization has moved from proof-of-concept to operational backbone: asset-level visibility, predictive replenishment, and integrated transportation orchestration now enable tighter alignment between maintenance schedules and parts flows. As these capabilities mature, they reduce emergency shipments and enable longer lead-time visibility, improving overall fleet availability.
Second, supply chain resilience has become a boardroom priority. Companies increasingly diversify supplier bases and establish regional repairable pools to localize critical capabilities. This trend is complemented by strategic use of third-party logistics partners that specialize in aviation-certified handling and rapid customs clearance. Third, sustainability considerations are reshaping packaging, kitting, and routing decisions, encouraging modal shifts where feasible and incentivizing recyclable or returnable packaging to reduce lifecycle costs and environmental footprint.
Finally, regulatory alignment and data interoperability are emerging as differentiators. Organizations that adopt standard data schemas and secure information-sharing protocols can streamline audits, expedite part certifications, and accelerate cross-border maintenance events. Together, these shifts require logistics leaders to integrate technology, governance, and partnerships into a coherent strategy that supports both operational excellence and strategic agility.
Analysis of the cumulative operational and contractual effects of the United States tariffs enacted in 2025 on aviation MRO supply chains and logistics decision-making
The introduction of targeted tariff measures by the United States in 2025 has introduced new operational and contractual frictions across aviation MRO logistics, with cumulative impacts manifesting across supplier selection, transportation routing, and inventory positioning. Tariff adjustments have elevated the importance of tariff classification, origin verification, and strategic sourcing, prompting many organizations to reexamine bilateral supplier relationships and to assess nearshoring alternatives. As a result, procurement teams now invest more in customs expertise and trade-compliance workflows to avoid duty exposure and minimize clearance delays.
Transportation networks have been affected as well, with some routings becoming less economically feasible and others gaining prominence due to relative tariff neutrality. In response, operators are increasingly segmenting parts based on criticality and tariff sensitivity, prioritizing air freight for mission-critical components while shifting less urgent consignments to road or sea where cross-border duty impacts are more manageable. This segmentation also influences packaging and kitting strategies, as consolidated shipments can reduce per-unit duty incidence but may conflict with turnaround time requirements.
Moreover, repairable pool management and aftermarket partnerships have adapted by renegotiating service level agreements and incorporating tariff contingency clauses. These contractual adjustments aim to preserve fleet readiness while sharing cost risk. Importantly, the cumulative effect of tariffs has accelerated investments in in-country repair capabilities and inventory localization for high-demand components, thereby reducing exposure to external policy shifts and improving long-term operational continuity.
Comprehensive segmentation-driven insights exposing how service, maintenance, provider, aircraft, operation, and channel distinctions determine distinct logistics architectures and priorities
A nuanced segmentation framework reveals distinct demand patterns and operational imperatives across logistics service types, maintenance types, provider categories, aircraft classes, operation cadences, and distribution channels. When logistics is considered by service type, organizations differentiate among distribution management, inventory management, packaging and kitting, procurement services, repairable pool management, transportation management, and warehousing, with inventory solutions further including consignment inventory, travel kit management, and vendor managed inventory, and transportation spanning air freight, road freight, and sea freight. This granularity clarifies where investments in automation, certified handling, or bonded warehousing yield the greatest operational return.
Maintenance-type segmentation distinguishes base maintenance, component maintenance, engine maintenance, and line maintenance, with base maintenance encompassing airframe maintenance, engine overhaul, and structural modifications. Each category imposes unique logistics rhythms: line maintenance requires fast fulfillment of routine consumables and turn-key kits, while engine overhaul and structural modifications demand complex reverse-logistics and specialized repairable handling. Provider-type segmentation splits the market into independent service providers and original equipment manufacturers, with independents further subdivided into specialized MRO specialists and third-party logistics providers, each bringing different strengths in scale, niche expertise, and contractual flexibility.
Aircraft-type segmentation into business jet, narrow body, regional jet, and wide body highlights variations in parts commonality, lead-time tolerance, and fleet utilization that drive tailored stocking and routing strategies. Operation-type segmentation into scheduled and unscheduled services underscores the need for both planned replenishment systems and rapid-response channels capable of supporting irregular events. Finally, distribution channel segmentation across direct, distributor, and online pathways influences procurement cadence and traceability requirements. Together, these segmentation axes enable operators to design differentiated logistics architectures that align inventory policy, transportation choices, and partner selection with the maintenance profile and operational tempo of their fleets.
Regional logistics realities and regulatory landscapes that shape where inventory is positioned, which modalities are prioritized, and how providers structure cross-border support networks
Regional dynamics create variable demand patterns and operational constraints that materially influence logistics design and partner selection. In the Americas, dense domestic networks, established repair hubs, and sophisticated customs processes support large localized repairable pools and just-in-time strategies for major airline fleets. That region’s mature logistical infrastructure and proximity to manufacturing centers make it well suited for integrated warehousing and rapid domestic distribution, while cross-border trade complexities necessitate targeted customs expertise for international movements.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory fragmentation and a wide range of operating conditions drive a preference for regional repair centers and flexible third-party logistics arrangements that can navigate diverse customs regimes and differing certification requirements. This combined region often prioritizes harmonized data exchange and contractual clarity to ensure compliance and expedite cross-border maintenance events. In the Asia-Pacific, rapid fleet growth, expanding MRO capacity, and evolving domestic manufacturing capabilities are reshaping logistics priorities toward scale, regional manufacturing partnerships, and increased emphasis on air freight corridors for high-priority parts. Across all regions, regulatory alignment, local content rules, and bilateral trade dynamics influence where operators locate inventory and which transportation modalities they rely upon to meet service-level commitments.
How market leaders are integrating certified handling, digital visibility, and repair partnerships to transition from transactional suppliers to strategic logistics and maintenance partners
Key companies operating within the aviation MRO logistics ecosystem are consolidating capabilities and differentiating through technology, certification, and network depth. Leading logistics providers are investing in aviation-certified handling, bonded warehousing, and specialized reverse-logistics processes to support high-value repairables and engine components. Simultaneously, MRO operators and OEM-affiliated service providers are expanding integrated offerings that combine technical maintenance expertise with end-to-end logistics orchestration, enabling single-vendor responsibility for parts, repair, and return flows.
Strategic partnerships between logistics specialists and repair shops have become commonplace, aligning transportation SLAs with maintenance throughput targets. Technology vendors that provide inventory orchestration, digital twin tracking, and customs automation are gaining traction as enablers of faster turn times and improved regulatory compliance. These trends highlight a competitive landscape where certification, data interoperability, and the ability to guarantee chain-of-custody are decisive factors in provider selection. Companies that effectively integrate these capabilities position themselves as strategic partners rather than transactional suppliers, which drives deeper commercial relationships and higher operational predictability.
Practical, actionable initiatives for executives to strengthen logistics resilience, speed up maintenance cycles, and align contracts, suppliers, and technology with operational priorities
Industry leaders should adopt a multifaceted approach that combines technology adoption, supplier diversification, and contractual innovation to strengthen operational resilience and reduce turnaround risk. Start by accelerating digitization initiatives that create a single source of truth for inventory, shipment status, and customs documentation; this reduces emergency shipments and improves predictability. Concurrently, reconfigure supplier portfolios to include regional repair pools and alternative sources for critical components, thereby minimizing exposure to single points of failure.
Next, revise commercial contracts to incorporate tariff and disruption clauses that equitably allocate risk while preserving service continuity. Invest in certified packaging and handling standards alongside recyclable solutions to lower lifecycle costs and meet sustainability targets. Enhance cross-functional governance by embedding logistics experts into maintenance planning cycles to ensure that transportation and inventory policies directly support maintenance windows. Finally, develop scenario-based playbooks and tabletop exercises that validate contingency routing, expedited customs procedures, and rapid vendor mobilization to maintain readiness during unexpected events. Together, these actions will sustain performance improvements while providing the flexibility needed to respond to evolving regulatory and market pressures.
Methodological approach combining executive interviews, regulatory review, case study synthesis, and scenario analysis to derive implementation-ready logistics insights for MRO stakeholders
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary inputs included interviews with logistics executives, maintenance leaders, and trade compliance specialists across airlines, MRO facilities, and third-party providers, which provided operational context and anecdotal evidence of emergent trends. These insights were triangulated with secondary sources including public regulatory materials, trade publications, and documented industry standards to validate observations and contextualize regional differences.
Analysts synthesized operational case studies to illustrate how specific logistics configurations influence maintenance outcomes and incorporated scenario analyses to examine the implications of tariff adjustments and modal shifts. Attention was given to data integrity, with multiple-source corroboration used to confirm claims regarding process changes and technology adoption. Throughout, the methodology emphasized operational relevance and practitioner perspectives, ensuring that recommendations reflect real-world constraints and can be implemented within existing organizational structures and governance frameworks.
A conclusive perspective on why integrating logistics strategy with maintenance planning and regulatory preparedness is essential for sustained fleet readiness and operational resilience
In conclusion, aviation MRO logistics is at an inflection point where technology, policy, and commercial strategy intersect to determine maintenance readiness and cost efficiency. Organizations that balance investments in digital visibility with pragmatic supply chain design-incorporating regional repairable pools, diversified supplier relationships, and robust customs capabilities-are best positioned to maintain high fleet availability in the face of disruption. Additionally, prioritizing certified handling, contractual clarity, and sustainable packaging will produce dual benefits in operational reliability and regulatory alignment.
Moving forward, stakeholders must treat logistics as a strategic capability rather than a transactional cost center. By integrating logistics decision-making into maintenance planning and executive strategy, operators can transform parts movement from a source of variability into a competitive advantage. This integrated approach enables more predictable maintenance outcomes, lowers the incidence of AOG-level disruptions, and supports long-term resilience in a complex global operating environment.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An incisive overview of current aviation MRO logistics dynamics revealing the operational pressures and strategic priorities shaping parts movement, traceability, and service reliability
The aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul logistics domain is undergoing a fundamental evolution driven by increasing complexity of fleet architectures, tighter maintenance windows, and intensified scrutiny on operational resilience. Supply chains that once prioritized lowest landed cost now balance cost with agility and traceability, while MRO operators face rising expectations for parts availability, rapid turnarounds, and certified handling across global networks. As stakeholders demand higher levels of visibility and compliance, logistics managers must adopt integrated processes that reduce risk without compromising throughput.
Consequently, cross-functional collaboration between procurement, planning, and technical operations has become essential. Digital enablers, including inventory digitization and advanced transportation analytics, are reshaping how parts are sourced, moved, and consumed. At the same time, regulatory frameworks and customer expectations put a premium on validated provenance and secure chain-of-custody practices. These dynamics set the stage for organizations to reevaluate partnerships, invest in modular logistics capabilities, and prioritize investments that deliver traceable reliability in addition to cost efficiency.
How digitalization, resilience strategies, sustainability priorities, and regulatory harmonization are converging to reshape aviation MRO logistics operations and partnerships
Over recent years, several transformative shifts have redefined how aviation MRO logistics creates value and mitigates risk. First, digitalization has moved from proof-of-concept to operational backbone: asset-level visibility, predictive replenishment, and integrated transportation orchestration now enable tighter alignment between maintenance schedules and parts flows. As these capabilities mature, they reduce emergency shipments and enable longer lead-time visibility, improving overall fleet availability.
Second, supply chain resilience has become a boardroom priority. Companies increasingly diversify supplier bases and establish regional repairable pools to localize critical capabilities. This trend is complemented by strategic use of third-party logistics partners that specialize in aviation-certified handling and rapid customs clearance. Third, sustainability considerations are reshaping packaging, kitting, and routing decisions, encouraging modal shifts where feasible and incentivizing recyclable or returnable packaging to reduce lifecycle costs and environmental footprint.
Finally, regulatory alignment and data interoperability are emerging as differentiators. Organizations that adopt standard data schemas and secure information-sharing protocols can streamline audits, expedite part certifications, and accelerate cross-border maintenance events. Together, these shifts require logistics leaders to integrate technology, governance, and partnerships into a coherent strategy that supports both operational excellence and strategic agility.
Analysis of the cumulative operational and contractual effects of the United States tariffs enacted in 2025 on aviation MRO supply chains and logistics decision-making
The introduction of targeted tariff measures by the United States in 2025 has introduced new operational and contractual frictions across aviation MRO logistics, with cumulative impacts manifesting across supplier selection, transportation routing, and inventory positioning. Tariff adjustments have elevated the importance of tariff classification, origin verification, and strategic sourcing, prompting many organizations to reexamine bilateral supplier relationships and to assess nearshoring alternatives. As a result, procurement teams now invest more in customs expertise and trade-compliance workflows to avoid duty exposure and minimize clearance delays.
Transportation networks have been affected as well, with some routings becoming less economically feasible and others gaining prominence due to relative tariff neutrality. In response, operators are increasingly segmenting parts based on criticality and tariff sensitivity, prioritizing air freight for mission-critical components while shifting less urgent consignments to road or sea where cross-border duty impacts are more manageable. This segmentation also influences packaging and kitting strategies, as consolidated shipments can reduce per-unit duty incidence but may conflict with turnaround time requirements.
Moreover, repairable pool management and aftermarket partnerships have adapted by renegotiating service level agreements and incorporating tariff contingency clauses. These contractual adjustments aim to preserve fleet readiness while sharing cost risk. Importantly, the cumulative effect of tariffs has accelerated investments in in-country repair capabilities and inventory localization for high-demand components, thereby reducing exposure to external policy shifts and improving long-term operational continuity.
Comprehensive segmentation-driven insights exposing how service, maintenance, provider, aircraft, operation, and channel distinctions determine distinct logistics architectures and priorities
A nuanced segmentation framework reveals distinct demand patterns and operational imperatives across logistics service types, maintenance types, provider categories, aircraft classes, operation cadences, and distribution channels. When logistics is considered by service type, organizations differentiate among distribution management, inventory management, packaging and kitting, procurement services, repairable pool management, transportation management, and warehousing, with inventory solutions further including consignment inventory, travel kit management, and vendor managed inventory, and transportation spanning air freight, road freight, and sea freight. This granularity clarifies where investments in automation, certified handling, or bonded warehousing yield the greatest operational return.
Maintenance-type segmentation distinguishes base maintenance, component maintenance, engine maintenance, and line maintenance, with base maintenance encompassing airframe maintenance, engine overhaul, and structural modifications. Each category imposes unique logistics rhythms: line maintenance requires fast fulfillment of routine consumables and turn-key kits, while engine overhaul and structural modifications demand complex reverse-logistics and specialized repairable handling. Provider-type segmentation splits the market into independent service providers and original equipment manufacturers, with independents further subdivided into specialized MRO specialists and third-party logistics providers, each bringing different strengths in scale, niche expertise, and contractual flexibility.
Aircraft-type segmentation into business jet, narrow body, regional jet, and wide body highlights variations in parts commonality, lead-time tolerance, and fleet utilization that drive tailored stocking and routing strategies. Operation-type segmentation into scheduled and unscheduled services underscores the need for both planned replenishment systems and rapid-response channels capable of supporting irregular events. Finally, distribution channel segmentation across direct, distributor, and online pathways influences procurement cadence and traceability requirements. Together, these segmentation axes enable operators to design differentiated logistics architectures that align inventory policy, transportation choices, and partner selection with the maintenance profile and operational tempo of their fleets.
Regional logistics realities and regulatory landscapes that shape where inventory is positioned, which modalities are prioritized, and how providers structure cross-border support networks
Regional dynamics create variable demand patterns and operational constraints that materially influence logistics design and partner selection. In the Americas, dense domestic networks, established repair hubs, and sophisticated customs processes support large localized repairable pools and just-in-time strategies for major airline fleets. That region’s mature logistical infrastructure and proximity to manufacturing centers make it well suited for integrated warehousing and rapid domestic distribution, while cross-border trade complexities necessitate targeted customs expertise for international movements.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory fragmentation and a wide range of operating conditions drive a preference for regional repair centers and flexible third-party logistics arrangements that can navigate diverse customs regimes and differing certification requirements. This combined region often prioritizes harmonized data exchange and contractual clarity to ensure compliance and expedite cross-border maintenance events. In the Asia-Pacific, rapid fleet growth, expanding MRO capacity, and evolving domestic manufacturing capabilities are reshaping logistics priorities toward scale, regional manufacturing partnerships, and increased emphasis on air freight corridors for high-priority parts. Across all regions, regulatory alignment, local content rules, and bilateral trade dynamics influence where operators locate inventory and which transportation modalities they rely upon to meet service-level commitments.
How market leaders are integrating certified handling, digital visibility, and repair partnerships to transition from transactional suppliers to strategic logistics and maintenance partners
Key companies operating within the aviation MRO logistics ecosystem are consolidating capabilities and differentiating through technology, certification, and network depth. Leading logistics providers are investing in aviation-certified handling, bonded warehousing, and specialized reverse-logistics processes to support high-value repairables and engine components. Simultaneously, MRO operators and OEM-affiliated service providers are expanding integrated offerings that combine technical maintenance expertise with end-to-end logistics orchestration, enabling single-vendor responsibility for parts, repair, and return flows.
Strategic partnerships between logistics specialists and repair shops have become commonplace, aligning transportation SLAs with maintenance throughput targets. Technology vendors that provide inventory orchestration, digital twin tracking, and customs automation are gaining traction as enablers of faster turn times and improved regulatory compliance. These trends highlight a competitive landscape where certification, data interoperability, and the ability to guarantee chain-of-custody are decisive factors in provider selection. Companies that effectively integrate these capabilities position themselves as strategic partners rather than transactional suppliers, which drives deeper commercial relationships and higher operational predictability.
Practical, actionable initiatives for executives to strengthen logistics resilience, speed up maintenance cycles, and align contracts, suppliers, and technology with operational priorities
Industry leaders should adopt a multifaceted approach that combines technology adoption, supplier diversification, and contractual innovation to strengthen operational resilience and reduce turnaround risk. Start by accelerating digitization initiatives that create a single source of truth for inventory, shipment status, and customs documentation; this reduces emergency shipments and improves predictability. Concurrently, reconfigure supplier portfolios to include regional repair pools and alternative sources for critical components, thereby minimizing exposure to single points of failure.
Next, revise commercial contracts to incorporate tariff and disruption clauses that equitably allocate risk while preserving service continuity. Invest in certified packaging and handling standards alongside recyclable solutions to lower lifecycle costs and meet sustainability targets. Enhance cross-functional governance by embedding logistics experts into maintenance planning cycles to ensure that transportation and inventory policies directly support maintenance windows. Finally, develop scenario-based playbooks and tabletop exercises that validate contingency routing, expedited customs procedures, and rapid vendor mobilization to maintain readiness during unexpected events. Together, these actions will sustain performance improvements while providing the flexibility needed to respond to evolving regulatory and market pressures.
Methodological approach combining executive interviews, regulatory review, case study synthesis, and scenario analysis to derive implementation-ready logistics insights for MRO stakeholders
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary inputs included interviews with logistics executives, maintenance leaders, and trade compliance specialists across airlines, MRO facilities, and third-party providers, which provided operational context and anecdotal evidence of emergent trends. These insights were triangulated with secondary sources including public regulatory materials, trade publications, and documented industry standards to validate observations and contextualize regional differences.
Analysts synthesized operational case studies to illustrate how specific logistics configurations influence maintenance outcomes and incorporated scenario analyses to examine the implications of tariff adjustments and modal shifts. Attention was given to data integrity, with multiple-source corroboration used to confirm claims regarding process changes and technology adoption. Throughout, the methodology emphasized operational relevance and practitioner perspectives, ensuring that recommendations reflect real-world constraints and can be implemented within existing organizational structures and governance frameworks.
A conclusive perspective on why integrating logistics strategy with maintenance planning and regulatory preparedness is essential for sustained fleet readiness and operational resilience
In conclusion, aviation MRO logistics is at an inflection point where technology, policy, and commercial strategy intersect to determine maintenance readiness and cost efficiency. Organizations that balance investments in digital visibility with pragmatic supply chain design-incorporating regional repairable pools, diversified supplier relationships, and robust customs capabilities-are best positioned to maintain high fleet availability in the face of disruption. Additionally, prioritizing certified handling, contractual clarity, and sustainable packaging will produce dual benefits in operational reliability and regulatory alignment.
Moving forward, stakeholders must treat logistics as a strategic capability rather than a transactional cost center. By integrating logistics decision-making into maintenance planning and executive strategy, operators can transform parts movement from a source of variability into a competitive advantage. This integrated approach enables more predictable maintenance outcomes, lowers the incidence of AOG-level disruptions, and supports long-term resilience in a complex global operating environment.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of predictive maintenance strategies using digital twins and AI for engine health monitoring and reduced downtime
- 5.2. Integration of blockchain-enabled traceability solutions to authenticate aircraft parts and streamline regulatory compliance
- 5.3. Implementation of 3D printing of certified spare parts within MRO hubs to shorten lead times and reduce inventory costs
- 5.4. Deployment of augmented reality remote assistance tools for technicians to improve efficiency in complex maintenance tasks
- 5.5. Utilization of autonomous ground support vehicles and robotics to optimize logistics handling at MRO facilities
- 5.6. Transition to sustainable aircraft maintenance practices with use of eco-friendly consumables and carbon neutral workflows
- 5.7. Consolidation of MRO service providers through strategic partnerships to create end-to-end digital supply chain platforms
- 5.8. Expansion of outsourced MRO logistics to emerging low-cost regions to mitigate capacity constraints at congested North American and European hubs
- 5.9. Standardization of data formats and interfaces between OEMs, airlines, and MROs to enable real-time visibility across multi-tier maintenance supply chains
- 5.10. Development of circular economy models for components including repair, teardown, and certified reuse to reduce lifecycle cost of aircraft fleets
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Aviation MRO Logistics Market, by Logistics Type
- 8.1. Distribution Management
- 8.2. Inventory Management
- 8.3. Packaging & Kitting
- 8.4. Procurement Services
- 8.5. Transportation Management
- 8.6. Warehousing
- 9. Aviation MRO Logistics Market, by Maintenance Type
- 9.1. Base Maintenance
- 9.1.1. Airframe Maintenance
- 9.1.2. Engine Overhaul
- 9.1.3. Structural Modifications
- 9.2. Component Maintenance
- 9.3. Engine Maintenance
- 9.4. Line Maintenance
- 9.5. Painting & Coating
- 10. Aviation MRO Logistics Market, by Operation Type
- 10.1. Scheduled
- 10.2. Unscheduled
- 11. Aviation MRO Logistics Market, by Transport Mode
- 11.1. Air Freight
- 11.2. Road Transport
- 11.3. Sea Freight
- 11.3.1. Full Container Load
- 11.3.2. Less Than Container Load
- 11.4. Rail Transport
- 11.5. Multimodal Solutions
- 12. Aviation MRO Logistics Market, by End-User
- 12.1. Passenger Airlines
- 12.2. Cargo Operators
- 12.3. OEM Organizations
- 12.3.1. Airframe OEMs
- 12.3.2. Engine OEMs
- 12.3.3. Component OEMs
- 12.4. Independent MRO Providers
- 12.5. Military & Government Operators
- 12.6. Leasing Companies
- 13. Aviation MRO Logistics Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Aviation MRO Logistics Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Aviation MRO Logistics Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. DHL Group
- 16.3.2. Lufthansa Technik AG
- 16.3.3. AAR CORP.
- 16.3.4. AFI KLM E&M
- 16.3.5. Airbus SAS
- 16.3.6. Aviation MRO Ltd.
- 16.3.7. CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
- 16.3.8. CMA CGM S.A.
- 16.3.9. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
- 16.3.10. Dimerco Express Corporation
- 16.3.11. DSV A/S
- 16.3.12. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
- 16.3.13. FedEx Corporation
- 16.3.14. Global Aerospace Logistics by Abu Dhabi Aviation
- 16.3.15. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.16. Kuehne + Nagel International AG
- 16.3.17. MNX by United Parcel Service, Inc.
- 16.3.18. MRO Japan Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.19. Nippon Express Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.20. S&K Technologies Inc.
- 16.3.21. Saab AB
- 16.3.22. Safran SA
- 16.3.23. SEKO Worldwide, LLC
- 16.3.24. Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
- 16.3.25. The Boeing Company
- 16.3.26. Yusen Logistics Global Management Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
