Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market by Vehicle Type (Heavy Commercial Vehicles, Light Commercial Vehicles, Passenger Cars), Actuation Type (Cable Driven, Electro Pneumatic, Motor Driven), Technology, Component Type, Integration Type, End User, Sale
Description
The Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market was valued at USD 10.31 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 11.00 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.14%, reaching USD 17.91 billion by 2032.
A strategic introduction that frames electronic parking brake systems as multidisciplinary components shaping safety integration, software dependency, and product lifecycle priorities
The evolution of vehicle safety and convenience systems has elevated the electronic parking brake from a luxury convenience to an integral element of contemporary vehicle architecture. Advances in actuator design, control electronics, and software integration have expanded the role of the electronic parking brake beyond static holding, enabling features such as automated hill hold, integration with advanced driver assistance systems, and tighter interaction with electric powertrains. As a result, stakeholders across design, procurement, and aftersales increasingly regard electronic parking brake systems as a multi-disciplinary challenge requiring coordinated mechanical, electrical, and software development.
This report opens with a focused examination of system architectures and the engineering trade-offs that govern choices between cable driven, electro pneumatic, and motor driven actuation. It then situates component selection-brake caliper, control unit, and electronic actuator-within broader criteria for manufacturability, diagnostics, and serviceability. The narrative emphasizes the implications of integration strategies, contrasting integrated modules with standalone solutions, and explores how those choices affect supplier relationships and product roadmaps. Finally, the introduction frames regulatory drivers, safety validation expectations, and the emergent importance of software updateability as they relate to total lifecycle performance and customer experience.
Transformative shifts driven by electrification, software integration, and evolving supplier roles that are redefining electronic parking brake engineering and sourcing strategies
The landscape for electronic parking brake systems is shifting rapidly as multiple vectors converge to reshape product and supply decisions. Electrification of powertrains is accelerating demand for actuation solutions that are compatible with high-voltage architectures and that support regenerative braking and electronic stability control interactions. Concurrently, the push for improved vehicle cabin space and simplified mechanical linkages is favoring electronic solutions that free designers from cable routing constraints. Regulatory expectations for system diagnostics and functional safety, together with increasing scrutiny on remote update capabilities, are elevating the role of control software and secure communications within what was traditionally a mechanical subsystem.
Supply chain dynamics are also in flux. Component modularization and trend toward integrated modules are prompting tier one suppliers and OEMs to renegotiate responsibilities for systems engineering, vehicle integration, and aftersales support. At the same time, technology differentiation is emerging through actuator types and caliper designs, with fixed and floating calipers, dual and single channel EPB modules, and hydraulic variants each presenting different cost, weight, and serviceability profiles. As such, manufacturers must re-evaluate product roadmaps and supplier strategies to remain competitive while ensuring compliance and reliability across diverse use cases.
Comprehensive assessment of how recent tariff dynamics and trade policy shifts have altered sourcing calculus, supply chain architecture, and manufacturing footprint decisions in the sector
Cumulative changes to tariff policy and trade enforcement through 2025 have added an additional layer of complexity to procurement and manufacturing decisions for electronic parking brake systems. Tariff adjustments affect the landed cost of components such as control units, actuators, and calipers, and they change the calculus for where value-adding activities such as assembly, testing, and final calibration are best located. In response, manufacturers have pursued a mix of mitigation strategies that include diversifying supplier portfolios, increasing regional sourcing content, and revisiting supplier agreements to allocate tariff exposure more explicitly.
These developments have also accelerated interest in local content strategies, nearshoring of subassembly operations, and the reconfiguration of logistics networks to reduce exposure to single points of policy vulnerability. For product teams, the practical implications include earlier engagement with customs and trade specialists, modified bill of materials structuring to exploit tariff classifications, and heightened scrutiny of component origin documentation. As companies adapt, they are balancing short-term cost pressures against longer-term objectives such as design portability, supplier resilience, and the ability to scale production rapidly when demand conditions recover or shift regionally.
In-depth segmentation analysis revealing how vehicle class, actuation modality, modular technology choices, and commercial channels collectively define engineering and commercial trade-offs
A segmentation-driven perspective reveals distinct technical and commercial pathways that guide product and go-to-market choices across the industry. When grouping by vehicle type, the contrast between heavy commercial vehicles, light commercial vehicles, and passenger cars highlights divergent priorities: heavy commercial platforms emphasize durability and serviceability under high-load conditions, light commercial vehicles require balanced payload and maintenance considerations, and passenger cars prioritize weight, noise, vibration, and harshness optimization alongside user experience.
Actuation choice-between cable driven, electro pneumatic, and motor driven configurations-creates a second axis of differentiation that influences packaging, control complexity, and integration with vehicle electronic networks. Technology variants such as E‑Caliper, EPB module, and hydraulic solutions present nuanced trade-offs. The E‑Caliper option further bifurcates into fixed caliper and floating caliper architectures that impact thermal behavior and cost structure, while EPB modules are implemented as dual channel or single channel designs that reflect differing fault tolerance and compliance requirements. Hydraulic implementations, categorized as dual line or single line, offer familiar service paradigms but require careful integration with vehicle brake hydraulics.
Component-level segmentation across brake calipers, control units, and electronic actuators underscores the need for coordinated supplier ecosystems and aligned validation protocols. Decisions about integration type-whether integrated modules or standalone systems-drive where value is captured along the supply chain and affect aftersales repairability and software management. Finally, commercial channels and end users, spanning aftermarket and OEM sale pathways and encompassing fleet operators as well as individual consumers, exert distinct expectations for warranty, diagnostics, and lifecycle support that should shape product specification and service frameworks.
Regional strategic imperatives across major geographies that determine adoption timing, localization needs, regulatory alignment, and aftersales service expectations for electronic parking brakes
Regional dynamics shape both demand characteristics and supply-side priorities, producing differentiated strategies across geographies. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on safety standards and a mature aftermarket ecosystem create opportunities for systems offering robust diagnostics and serviceability, while also encouraging local content strategies that reduce logistical exposure and tariff sensitivity. OEMs and suppliers in this region are increasingly focused on integration with North American vehicle architectures and on ensuring compatibility with region-specific ADAS and light-off requirements.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a nuanced environment where stringent functional safety standards, emissions regulations that influence vehicle electrification schedules, and dense supplier networks drive rapid technology adoption. In this region, modular EPB designs that simplify vehicle integration and support over‑the‑air updates tend to gain traction more quickly, while established aftersales channels and strict homologation timelines necessitate early alignment between system suppliers and vehicle manufacturers. Asia-Pacific remains a wide spectrum of adoption and manufacturing intensity, combining high-volume production hubs with rapidly growing EV and commercial vehicle markets. Suppliers operating here must balance cost-effective manufacturing with the flexibility to serve diverse market requirements, from compact passenger cars to heavy commercial platforms. Across all regions, localization of production, alignment with regional regulatory frameworks, and investment in diagnostics and cybersecurity capabilities are central to achieving both commercial success and compliance.
Insights into supplier strategies, consolidation trends, and technology differentiation that determine which companies gain program wins and long-term platform positions
Competitive dynamics among leading suppliers and OEMs reveal patterns of capability consolidation, strategic partnerships, and technical differentiation. Market leaders are investing in integrated hardware-software stacks that combine actuators, control units, and diagnostics, thereby offering manufacturers simplified system integration and ongoing software support. At the same time, specialist suppliers are carving niches by optimizing specific actuator technologies or caliper architectures, leveraging manufacturing expertise and targeted IP to win platform-specific programs.
Collaboration models have evolved, with more frequent joint development agreements between tier one suppliers and vehicle manufacturers to accelerate validation and share system-level responsibilities. This trend is accompanied by selective verticalization, where some OEMs internalize module assembly and calibration to retain control over software update paths and aftersales data. Strategic M&A and targeted investments in manufacturing scale are also evident, particularly where component standardization and high-volume platforms justify larger capital outlays. Intellectual property around actuator control algorithms, fault detection, and thermal management is a core source of differentiation, as is the supplier’s ability to offer robust diagnostics, secure communication channels, and straightforward service procedures that minimize warranty exposure and total cost of ownership for fleet operators and individual consumers alike.
Actionable strategic recommendations for product, supply chain, and software priorities to reduce risk, accelerate integration, and maximize commercial value in electronic parking brake programs
Business leaders and product teams should adopt a pragmatic, multi-dimensional approach to remain competitive while managing technical risk. First, align product roadmaps with actuation technologies and caliper architectures that match your core customer segments: prioritize motor driven and E‑Caliper solutions for passenger car weight and NVH objectives, while ensuring that hydraulic and robust fixed caliper options remain available for heavy commercial applications requiring service simplicity and high durability. Secondly, embed software and diagnostics strategies early in system design to support secure over‑the‑air updates, to facilitate fleet-level telematics integration, and to reduce in-field failures through predictive maintenance capabilities.
Supply chain resilience must be elevated to a strategic priority. Pursue multi-sourcing for critical control unit and actuator components, increase content localization in high-risk trade corridors, and negotiate commercial terms that share policy-driven cost exposure. For commercialization, create differentiated aftersales propositions that reduce total cost of ownership for fleet operators while offering convenient repairability for individual consumers. Finally, invest in rigorous validation and test regimes that cover mixed electric and hydraulic scenarios, integrate cybersecurity assessments into functional safety processes, and plan for phased introduction of advanced features so that regulatory compliance and customer acceptance progress in step with technical deployment.
Rigorous mixed-method research approach combining primary interviews, technical benchmarking, supply chain mapping, and regulatory triangulation to ensure robust conclusions
The findings presented rest on a structured research methodology that blends primary engagement with systematic secondary analysis and technical validation. Primary inputs included confidential interviews with system designers, procurement leads, and aftersales managers across vehicle manufacturers and tier one suppliers, combined with guided discussions with assembly and test engineers to capture practical constraints in integration and validation. This qualitative intelligence was complemented by detailed technical benchmarking of actuator designs, caliper typologies, and module architectures through teardown analysis and engineering assessments.
To ensure robustness, the qualitative insights were triangulated with publicly available regulatory documentation, patent filings, and component-level standards to verify compliance trends and emerging IP positioning. Supply chain mapping exercises identified sources of critical components and logistics dependencies, and scenario analysis explored how policy shifts and regional manufacturing choices could affect operational decisions. Throughout the research, emphasis was placed on traceable evidence, reproducible engineering observations, and cross-validation of claims to deliver conclusions that are actionable for engineering, procurement, and strategy teams.
Concise closing synthesis highlighting how technical integration, supply chain resilience, and software readiness will determine competitive advantage in the sector
The electronic parking brake landscape is defined by converging forces: increasing electrification, heightened software dependency, evolving trade policies, and differentiated regional requirements. These forces create a matrix of technical and commercial decisions that influence not only component selection but also supplier relationships, manufacturing footprints, and aftersales strategies. Successful participants will be those that consciously integrate mechanical design choices with control software capabilities, that embed diagnostic and cybersecurity features from the outset, and that align sourcing strategies with regional regulatory realities.
Looking ahead, companies that invest in flexible architectures, secure software ecosystems, and resilient supply chains are poised to deliver systems that meet the dual imperatives of safety compliance and customer experience. Furthermore, clear prioritization of validation, close collaboration between OEMs and suppliers, and disciplined execution of localization plans will be essential to translate technical capability into reliable, serviceable products for both fleet operators and individual consumers. Ultimately, the most effective strategies will be those that balance near-term operational pragmatism with medium-term investments in technology and supplier partnerships.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction that frames electronic parking brake systems as multidisciplinary components shaping safety integration, software dependency, and product lifecycle priorities
The evolution of vehicle safety and convenience systems has elevated the electronic parking brake from a luxury convenience to an integral element of contemporary vehicle architecture. Advances in actuator design, control electronics, and software integration have expanded the role of the electronic parking brake beyond static holding, enabling features such as automated hill hold, integration with advanced driver assistance systems, and tighter interaction with electric powertrains. As a result, stakeholders across design, procurement, and aftersales increasingly regard electronic parking brake systems as a multi-disciplinary challenge requiring coordinated mechanical, electrical, and software development.
This report opens with a focused examination of system architectures and the engineering trade-offs that govern choices between cable driven, electro pneumatic, and motor driven actuation. It then situates component selection-brake caliper, control unit, and electronic actuator-within broader criteria for manufacturability, diagnostics, and serviceability. The narrative emphasizes the implications of integration strategies, contrasting integrated modules with standalone solutions, and explores how those choices affect supplier relationships and product roadmaps. Finally, the introduction frames regulatory drivers, safety validation expectations, and the emergent importance of software updateability as they relate to total lifecycle performance and customer experience.
Transformative shifts driven by electrification, software integration, and evolving supplier roles that are redefining electronic parking brake engineering and sourcing strategies
The landscape for electronic parking brake systems is shifting rapidly as multiple vectors converge to reshape product and supply decisions. Electrification of powertrains is accelerating demand for actuation solutions that are compatible with high-voltage architectures and that support regenerative braking and electronic stability control interactions. Concurrently, the push for improved vehicle cabin space and simplified mechanical linkages is favoring electronic solutions that free designers from cable routing constraints. Regulatory expectations for system diagnostics and functional safety, together with increasing scrutiny on remote update capabilities, are elevating the role of control software and secure communications within what was traditionally a mechanical subsystem.
Supply chain dynamics are also in flux. Component modularization and trend toward integrated modules are prompting tier one suppliers and OEMs to renegotiate responsibilities for systems engineering, vehicle integration, and aftersales support. At the same time, technology differentiation is emerging through actuator types and caliper designs, with fixed and floating calipers, dual and single channel EPB modules, and hydraulic variants each presenting different cost, weight, and serviceability profiles. As such, manufacturers must re-evaluate product roadmaps and supplier strategies to remain competitive while ensuring compliance and reliability across diverse use cases.
Comprehensive assessment of how recent tariff dynamics and trade policy shifts have altered sourcing calculus, supply chain architecture, and manufacturing footprint decisions in the sector
Cumulative changes to tariff policy and trade enforcement through 2025 have added an additional layer of complexity to procurement and manufacturing decisions for electronic parking brake systems. Tariff adjustments affect the landed cost of components such as control units, actuators, and calipers, and they change the calculus for where value-adding activities such as assembly, testing, and final calibration are best located. In response, manufacturers have pursued a mix of mitigation strategies that include diversifying supplier portfolios, increasing regional sourcing content, and revisiting supplier agreements to allocate tariff exposure more explicitly.
These developments have also accelerated interest in local content strategies, nearshoring of subassembly operations, and the reconfiguration of logistics networks to reduce exposure to single points of policy vulnerability. For product teams, the practical implications include earlier engagement with customs and trade specialists, modified bill of materials structuring to exploit tariff classifications, and heightened scrutiny of component origin documentation. As companies adapt, they are balancing short-term cost pressures against longer-term objectives such as design portability, supplier resilience, and the ability to scale production rapidly when demand conditions recover or shift regionally.
In-depth segmentation analysis revealing how vehicle class, actuation modality, modular technology choices, and commercial channels collectively define engineering and commercial trade-offs
A segmentation-driven perspective reveals distinct technical and commercial pathways that guide product and go-to-market choices across the industry. When grouping by vehicle type, the contrast between heavy commercial vehicles, light commercial vehicles, and passenger cars highlights divergent priorities: heavy commercial platforms emphasize durability and serviceability under high-load conditions, light commercial vehicles require balanced payload and maintenance considerations, and passenger cars prioritize weight, noise, vibration, and harshness optimization alongside user experience.
Actuation choice-between cable driven, electro pneumatic, and motor driven configurations-creates a second axis of differentiation that influences packaging, control complexity, and integration with vehicle electronic networks. Technology variants such as E‑Caliper, EPB module, and hydraulic solutions present nuanced trade-offs. The E‑Caliper option further bifurcates into fixed caliper and floating caliper architectures that impact thermal behavior and cost structure, while EPB modules are implemented as dual channel or single channel designs that reflect differing fault tolerance and compliance requirements. Hydraulic implementations, categorized as dual line or single line, offer familiar service paradigms but require careful integration with vehicle brake hydraulics.
Component-level segmentation across brake calipers, control units, and electronic actuators underscores the need for coordinated supplier ecosystems and aligned validation protocols. Decisions about integration type-whether integrated modules or standalone systems-drive where value is captured along the supply chain and affect aftersales repairability and software management. Finally, commercial channels and end users, spanning aftermarket and OEM sale pathways and encompassing fleet operators as well as individual consumers, exert distinct expectations for warranty, diagnostics, and lifecycle support that should shape product specification and service frameworks.
Regional strategic imperatives across major geographies that determine adoption timing, localization needs, regulatory alignment, and aftersales service expectations for electronic parking brakes
Regional dynamics shape both demand characteristics and supply-side priorities, producing differentiated strategies across geographies. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on safety standards and a mature aftermarket ecosystem create opportunities for systems offering robust diagnostics and serviceability, while also encouraging local content strategies that reduce logistical exposure and tariff sensitivity. OEMs and suppliers in this region are increasingly focused on integration with North American vehicle architectures and on ensuring compatibility with region-specific ADAS and light-off requirements.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a nuanced environment where stringent functional safety standards, emissions regulations that influence vehicle electrification schedules, and dense supplier networks drive rapid technology adoption. In this region, modular EPB designs that simplify vehicle integration and support over‑the‑air updates tend to gain traction more quickly, while established aftersales channels and strict homologation timelines necessitate early alignment between system suppliers and vehicle manufacturers. Asia-Pacific remains a wide spectrum of adoption and manufacturing intensity, combining high-volume production hubs with rapidly growing EV and commercial vehicle markets. Suppliers operating here must balance cost-effective manufacturing with the flexibility to serve diverse market requirements, from compact passenger cars to heavy commercial platforms. Across all regions, localization of production, alignment with regional regulatory frameworks, and investment in diagnostics and cybersecurity capabilities are central to achieving both commercial success and compliance.
Insights into supplier strategies, consolidation trends, and technology differentiation that determine which companies gain program wins and long-term platform positions
Competitive dynamics among leading suppliers and OEMs reveal patterns of capability consolidation, strategic partnerships, and technical differentiation. Market leaders are investing in integrated hardware-software stacks that combine actuators, control units, and diagnostics, thereby offering manufacturers simplified system integration and ongoing software support. At the same time, specialist suppliers are carving niches by optimizing specific actuator technologies or caliper architectures, leveraging manufacturing expertise and targeted IP to win platform-specific programs.
Collaboration models have evolved, with more frequent joint development agreements between tier one suppliers and vehicle manufacturers to accelerate validation and share system-level responsibilities. This trend is accompanied by selective verticalization, where some OEMs internalize module assembly and calibration to retain control over software update paths and aftersales data. Strategic M&A and targeted investments in manufacturing scale are also evident, particularly where component standardization and high-volume platforms justify larger capital outlays. Intellectual property around actuator control algorithms, fault detection, and thermal management is a core source of differentiation, as is the supplier’s ability to offer robust diagnostics, secure communication channels, and straightforward service procedures that minimize warranty exposure and total cost of ownership for fleet operators and individual consumers alike.
Actionable strategic recommendations for product, supply chain, and software priorities to reduce risk, accelerate integration, and maximize commercial value in electronic parking brake programs
Business leaders and product teams should adopt a pragmatic, multi-dimensional approach to remain competitive while managing technical risk. First, align product roadmaps with actuation technologies and caliper architectures that match your core customer segments: prioritize motor driven and E‑Caliper solutions for passenger car weight and NVH objectives, while ensuring that hydraulic and robust fixed caliper options remain available for heavy commercial applications requiring service simplicity and high durability. Secondly, embed software and diagnostics strategies early in system design to support secure over‑the‑air updates, to facilitate fleet-level telematics integration, and to reduce in-field failures through predictive maintenance capabilities.
Supply chain resilience must be elevated to a strategic priority. Pursue multi-sourcing for critical control unit and actuator components, increase content localization in high-risk trade corridors, and negotiate commercial terms that share policy-driven cost exposure. For commercialization, create differentiated aftersales propositions that reduce total cost of ownership for fleet operators while offering convenient repairability for individual consumers. Finally, invest in rigorous validation and test regimes that cover mixed electric and hydraulic scenarios, integrate cybersecurity assessments into functional safety processes, and plan for phased introduction of advanced features so that regulatory compliance and customer acceptance progress in step with technical deployment.
Rigorous mixed-method research approach combining primary interviews, technical benchmarking, supply chain mapping, and regulatory triangulation to ensure robust conclusions
The findings presented rest on a structured research methodology that blends primary engagement with systematic secondary analysis and technical validation. Primary inputs included confidential interviews with system designers, procurement leads, and aftersales managers across vehicle manufacturers and tier one suppliers, combined with guided discussions with assembly and test engineers to capture practical constraints in integration and validation. This qualitative intelligence was complemented by detailed technical benchmarking of actuator designs, caliper typologies, and module architectures through teardown analysis and engineering assessments.
To ensure robustness, the qualitative insights were triangulated with publicly available regulatory documentation, patent filings, and component-level standards to verify compliance trends and emerging IP positioning. Supply chain mapping exercises identified sources of critical components and logistics dependencies, and scenario analysis explored how policy shifts and regional manufacturing choices could affect operational decisions. Throughout the research, emphasis was placed on traceable evidence, reproducible engineering observations, and cross-validation of claims to deliver conclusions that are actionable for engineering, procurement, and strategy teams.
Concise closing synthesis highlighting how technical integration, supply chain resilience, and software readiness will determine competitive advantage in the sector
The electronic parking brake landscape is defined by converging forces: increasing electrification, heightened software dependency, evolving trade policies, and differentiated regional requirements. These forces create a matrix of technical and commercial decisions that influence not only component selection but also supplier relationships, manufacturing footprints, and aftersales strategies. Successful participants will be those that consciously integrate mechanical design choices with control software capabilities, that embed diagnostic and cybersecurity features from the outset, and that align sourcing strategies with regional regulatory realities.
Looking ahead, companies that invest in flexible architectures, secure software ecosystems, and resilient supply chains are poised to deliver systems that meet the dual imperatives of safety compliance and customer experience. Furthermore, clear prioritization of validation, close collaboration between OEMs and suppliers, and disciplined execution of localization plans will be essential to translate technical capability into reliable, serviceable products for both fleet operators and individual consumers. Ultimately, the most effective strategies will be those that balance near-term operational pragmatism with medium-term investments in technology and supplier partnerships.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of electronic parking brake systems with advanced driver assistance features for automated hill holds
- 5.2. Development of compact and lightweight electric parking brake actuators to meet stringent vehicle electrification requirements
- 5.3. Adoption of fail-safe diagnostic communication protocols in EPB modules for enhanced cybersecurity and operational reliability
- 5.4. Emergence of predictive maintenance analytics for electronic parking brakes leveraging vehicle telematics and IoT connectivity
- 5.5. Implementation of centralized braking management architectures combining EPB with brake-by-wire systems in autonomous vehicles
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by Vehicle Type
- 8.1. Heavy Commercial Vehicles
- 8.2. Light Commercial Vehicles
- 8.3. Passenger Cars
- 9. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by Actuation Type
- 9.1. Cable Driven
- 9.2. Electro Pneumatic
- 9.3. Motor Driven
- 10. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by Technology
- 10.1. E-Caliper
- 10.1.1. Fixed Caliper
- 10.1.2. Floating Caliper
- 10.2. Epb Module
- 10.2.1. Dual Channel
- 10.2.2. Single Channel
- 10.3. Hydraulic
- 10.3.1. Dual Line
- 10.3.2. Single Line
- 11. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by Component Type
- 11.1. Brake Caliper
- 11.2. Control Unit
- 11.3. Electronic Actuator
- 12. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by Integration Type
- 12.1. Integrated
- 12.2. Standalone
- 13. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by End User
- 13.1. Fleet Operator
- 13.2. Individual Consumer
- 14. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by Sales Channel
- 14.1. Aftermarket
- 14.2. Oem
- 15. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by Region
- 15.1. Americas
- 15.1.1. North America
- 15.1.2. Latin America
- 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 15.2.1. Europe
- 15.2.2. Middle East
- 15.2.3. Africa
- 15.3. Asia-Pacific
- 16. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by Group
- 16.1. ASEAN
- 16.2. GCC
- 16.3. European Union
- 16.4. BRICS
- 16.5. G7
- 16.6. NATO
- 17. Automotive Electronic Parking Brake Market, by Country
- 17.1. United States
- 17.2. Canada
- 17.3. Mexico
- 17.4. Brazil
- 17.5. United Kingdom
- 17.6. Germany
- 17.7. France
- 17.8. Russia
- 17.9. Italy
- 17.10. Spain
- 17.11. China
- 17.12. India
- 17.13. Japan
- 17.14. Australia
- 17.15. South Korea
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 18.3. Competitive Analysis
- 18.3.1. ZF Friedrichshafen AG
- 18.3.2. Continental AG
- 18.3.3. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 18.3.4. Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd.
- 18.3.5. Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.
- 18.3.6. Mando Corporation
- 18.3.7. Hitachi Astemo, Ltd.
- 18.3.8. Denso Corporation
- 18.3.9. ADVICS Co., Ltd.
- 18.3.10. Brembo S.p.A.
- 18.3.11. Akebono Brake Industry Co., Ltd.
- 18.3.12. Nissin Kogyo Co., Ltd.
- 18.3.13. Knorr‑Bremse AG
- 18.3.14. WABCO Holdings Inc.
- 18.3.15. Küster Holding GmbH
- 18.3.16. TBK Co., Ltd.
- 18.3.17. Chassis Brakes International B.V.
- 18.3.18. Nisshinbo Holdings Inc.
- 18.3.19. Valeo SA
- 18.3.20. Hella GmbH & Co. KGaA
- 18.3.21. Dura Automotive Systems, LLC
- 18.3.22. BWI Group
- 18.3.23. Alfmeier Präzision SE
- 18.3.24. Kongsberg Automotive ASA
- 18.3.25. Shanghai Automotive Brake Systems Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
