Automotive Electric Motors Market by Motor Type (Induction Motor, Permanent Magnet Motor, Switched Reluctance Motor), Vehicle Type (Commercial Vehicle, Passenger Vehicle), Power Output, Application, Cooling Method, Phase Type - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Automotive Electric Motors Market was valued at USD 31.96 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 33.76 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.13%, reaching USD 51.47 billion by 2032.
Framing the modern automotive electric motor landscape through the convergence of technology innovation, supply chain evolution, and vehicle electrification strategies
The evolution of electric motors within the automotive sector has been thrust into the spotlight as electrification shifts from optional feature to industry imperative. Advances in materials science, power electronics, and manufacturing precision are enabling motors that are lighter, more efficient, and more durable than a generation ago. At the same time, emergent control strategies and integration with vehicle architectures have elevated the motor from a component to a central node in overall vehicle performance and energy management. This introduction outlines the technological, regulatory, and commercial currents shaping the electric motor landscape, establishing the context for the detailed analysis that follows.
Transitioning from internal combustion to electrified powertrains has prompted a rethink of motor design priorities. Where torque density and cost once dominated, the contemporary design brief also demands thermal robustness, electromagnetic compatibility with high-power inverters, and adaptability across diverse vehicle platforms. Consequently, manufacturers are investing in scalable architectures that can be tuned for passenger cars, SUVs, and heavy commercial vehicles without sacrificing manufacturability. Complementing these engineering shifts are supply chain and policy influences that are accelerating material substitution and localization strategies. The interplay of these forces creates both opportunity and urgency for OEMs and suppliers seeking durable competitive advantage.
Understanding the decisive paradigm shifts transforming motor design, manufacturing, and integration across vehicle electrification and supply chain resilience
The last five years have seen transformative shifts that are redefining how electric motors are designed, produced, and deployed across automotive fleets. First, the broader electrification imperative has moved beyond passenger cars to include commercial vehicles, creating demand for motors optimized for sustained duty cycles and higher thermal loads. This has driven renewed interest in motor topologies that can balance efficiency with ruggedness under continuous heavy load. Second, magnet material dynamics and raw material geopolitics have catalyzed diversification in motor type selection; manufacturers are increasingly weighing permanent magnet solutions against induction and switched reluctance options to manage cost volatility and supply risk while preserving performance targets.
Third, system-level integration is reshaping component boundaries. Motors are increasingly engineered in tandem with inverters, cooling systems, and software-defined controls to extract efficiency gains and enable features such as torque vectoring and predictive thermal management. Fourth, manufacturing trends toward modular, scalable production cells and increased automation are shortening time-to-market and supporting higher part complexity without proportional cost penalties. Finally, digitalization across design, simulation, and production-from advanced multiphysics modeling to in-line quality analytics-has compressed development cycles and improved reliability forecasts. Together, these shifts are creating a more competitive and innovation-driven market where agility and systems thinking determine winners.
Assessing the cumulative effects of new United States tariff measures through 2025 on procurement strategies, production localization, and motor architecture choices
Recent tariff policies implemented by the United States through 2025 have introduced a layer of complexity to the automotive electric motor ecosystem, influencing sourcing decisions, cost structures, and supplier strategies. Tariffs aimed at specific components and raw materials have incentivized OEMs and tier suppliers to reassess procurement footprints and to accelerate nearshoring and regional sourcing initiatives. In response, many manufacturers have diversified supplier bases and adjusted production allocations to mitigate exposure to tariff-driven cost increases and trade frictions. These recalibrations have been particularly pronounced for subcomponents that rely on imported magnet materials, specialized laminations, or precision components produced in regions affected by tariff measures.
Moreover, tariffs have reinforced the strategic appeal of motor architectures that reduce reliance on constrained inputs. For example, where permanent magnet motors depend on rare-earth materials that may be subject to trade measures, some manufacturers have expanded development of induction and switched reluctance motors as hedges against supply and cost uncertainty. In parallel, tariffs have affected logistics and inventory strategies, prompting increased investment in localized warehousing and buffer inventories to smooth production continuity. While tariffs have raised near-term operational costs for some players, they have also accelerated industrial policy responses, public-private partnerships, and capital allocation toward domestic capacity expansion, creating a rebalanced landscape in which regional manufacturing competitiveness and supplier resilience increasingly shape commercial outcomes.
Driving strategic product differentiation by integrating motor type, vehicle application, power class, cooling approach, and phase configuration into cohesive segmentation insights
A nuanced understanding of segmentation is essential for aligning product strategy with end-user requirements and regulatory constraints. When considering motor type, differentiation between induction motor variants such as squirrel cage and wound rotor informs trade-offs in robustness and control complexity, while permanent magnet topologies, split into interior and surface magnet constructions, determine torque density and thermal management approaches. Switched reluctance motors present a distinct path prioritizing simplicity and reduced dependence on magnetic materials, which can be advantageous in contexts of material volatility.
Vehicle type segmentation highlights divergent performance priorities: commercial vehicles, split into heavy and light categories, demand sustained thermal performance and high duty-cycle durability, whereas passenger vehicle segments-hatchback, sedan, and SUV-prioritize cost-efficient packaging, NVH performance, and driving dynamics. Power output segmentation into high, medium, and low power classes further refines engineering choices, since thermal systems, cooling methods, and control strategies scale nonlinearly with continuous power demands. Application-driven segmentation separates auxiliary motors, exemplified by HVAC blower and power steering applications that prioritize compactness and low-noise operation, from traction motors where configurations such as all-wheel drive, front axle, and rear axle traction motors define torque distribution strategies and axle-level integration constraints. Cooling method segmentation distinguishes air-cooled and liquid-cooled approaches, which carry implications for packaging, heat rejection, and peak power capability. Lastly, phase type segmentation into single-phase and three-phase motors affects inverter complexity and harmonic management, with three-phase systems dominating high-performance traction applications and single-phase units remaining relevant for selected auxiliary functions. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables targeted product roadmaps that reconcile material availability, cost objectives, and vehicle architecture constraints.
Navigating distinct regional imperatives that shape manufacturing localization, regulatory compliance, and product engineering across global markets
Regional dynamics are reshaping investment priorities, production strategies, and go-to-market approaches across the global electric motor landscape. In the Americas, policies encouraging electric vehicle adoption and domestic industrial investment have stimulated interest in localized capacity for both core motors and associated power electronics. This regional push is coupled with logistical advantages for serving North and South American OEMs and an appetite for collaborations that reduce exposure to transoceanic supply chain disruptions. Consequently, manufacturers with nearshore manufacturing capabilities and adaptable production cells are well positioned to capitalize on fleet electrification in commercial and passenger segments.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory stringency on emissions and a focus on energy transition have accelerated demand for high-efficiency motor platforms, while automotive OEMs in Europe emphasize integration with vehicle control systems to meet stringent lifecycle and sustainability criteria. Investment patterns here favor high-precision production and advanced materials research. In the Asia-Pacific region, dense manufacturing ecosystems and extensive component supplier networks continue to drive scale advantages, particularly for magnet-dependent motor architectures; at the same time, rapid adoption of electric two- and four-wheel vehicles has incentivized innovation in compact and cost-efficient motor designs. Taken together, regional conditions are prompting differentiated strategies: capacity expansion and localization in the Americas, precision and regulatory alignment in Europe, Middle East & Africa, and scale-driven cost optimization and rapid product iteration in Asia-Pacific.
Evaluating competitive positioning where hardware innovation, system integration, and supply chain control determine long-term leadership in motor technologies
Competitive dynamics among motor manufacturers and suppliers reflect both technological specialization and strategic positioning across the value chain. Leading firms are advancing platform approaches that allow a single motor architecture to be adapted across multiple vehicle types and power classes, thereby improving margin resilience and accelerating time-to-market. Some companies concentrate on high-torque-density permanent magnet solutions optimized for passenger vehicles and performance applications, while others invest in robust induction or switched reluctance platforms tailored for commercial vehicle duty cycles where longevity and thermal resilience are paramount. Beyond pure-play motor manufacturers, system integrators offering combined motor-inverter assemblies and thermal management packages are gaining traction by simplifying OEM supply chains and enabling faster integration at the vehicle level.
Supplier strategies also include vertical moves into magnet recycling and material sourcing to reduce exposure to raw material volatility, and partnerships with semiconductor and control software firms to enhance the electronic and algorithmic capabilities of motor systems. Service providers offering predictive maintenance analytics and digital twins are creating aftermarket value propositions that extend the lifecycle economics of deployed motors. The competitive landscape is therefore characterized by a blend of hardware innovation, software-enabled differentiation, and supply chain control measures that collectively determine which players capture value as electrification continues to scale.
Actionable strategic priorities for manufacturers to secure resilience, scale, and integrated product leadership across evolving automotive electrification demands
Industry leaders must take deliberate actions to translate market signals into sustainable advantage. First, firms should prioritize architecture modularity that enables a single motor platform to be scaled across power outputs and vehicle types, thereby reducing engineering overhead and inventory diversity. Concurrently, investing in alternative motor topologies and material substitution programs will mitigate risk from rare-earth concentration and tariff-driven supply disruptions. Companies should also strengthen partnerships with inverter and control software providers to deliver integrated motor-electronics packages that streamline OEM integration and improve overall system efficiency.
Operationally, leaders should accelerate localization strategies that align production footprints with key demand centers, reducing lead times and exposure to trade barriers. Manufacturing investments should combine automation with flexible cell design to handle both volume production and limited-run specialized variants. From a commercial perspective, expanding offerings to include digital services-such as predictive maintenance, fleet analytics, and lifecycle optimization-can unlock recurring revenue streams and deepen customer relationships. Finally, proactive engagement with policy makers and participation in industry standards bodies will help shape regulatory and trade environments in ways that support long-term product and investment planning. Taken together, these actions form a coherent playbook for capturing value amid technological and geopolitical disruption.
Robust mixed-method research approach combining primary expert engagement, technology assessment, and scenario analysis to underpin strategic recommendations
This research synthesizes engineering literature, industry announcements, patent filings, supplier disclosures, and expert interviews to build a holistic view of the automotive electric motor sector. Primary research included structured discussions with design engineers, procurement leads, and aftermarket managers from OEMs and tier suppliers, supplemented by consultations with materials scientists and power electronics specialists to validate technical performance trade-offs. Secondary research drew on recent regulatory texts, industry white papers, and publicly available corporate filings to establish timelines for policy shifts and capital deployment.
Analytical methods combined qualitative scenario analysis with comparative technology assessment, emphasizing the interplay of thermal management, material dependencies, and system-level integration. Sensitivity analysis was applied to procurement and supply chain assumptions to identify critical risk vectors, while case studies illustrated how leading manufacturers have implemented modular architectures and localization strategies. Throughout, data quality controls and cross-validation with multiple independent sources were employed to ensure robustness of conclusions. This methodology facilitates actionable insights that bridge technical feasibility with strategic commercial considerations for stakeholders evaluating motor technologies and supply chain configurations.
Summarizing the strategic imperatives where integrated engineering, supply chain resilience, and digital services determine competitive outcomes
In conclusion, the automotive electric motor landscape is undergoing a period of rapid reconfiguration driven by technological innovation, shifting policy frameworks, and evolving commercial imperatives. Motor design is increasingly evaluated as part of a cohesive vehicle system, demanding integration across electrical, thermal, and software domains. Concurrently, geopolitical and trade dynamics, including tariff measures, are reshaping supply chains and accelerating localization and material substitution strategies. Firms that balance platform modularity, supply chain resilience, and systems-level integration will be best positioned to meet diverse vehicle requirements while controlling cost and risk.
Looking ahead, strategic differentiation will arise from the ability to deliver integrated motor-electronics-thermal solutions, to harness digital services for lifecycle value, and to respond nimbly to regional policy signals. Manufacturers that invest in alternative motor topologies, strengthen material sourcing strategies, and cultivate partnerships across the software and semiconductor ecosystem can convert disruption into opportunity. Ultimately, success will depend not only on technical excellence but on the alignment of engineering decisions with procurement flexibility, manufacturing agility, and customer-centric commercial models.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the modern automotive electric motor landscape through the convergence of technology innovation, supply chain evolution, and vehicle electrification strategies
The evolution of electric motors within the automotive sector has been thrust into the spotlight as electrification shifts from optional feature to industry imperative. Advances in materials science, power electronics, and manufacturing precision are enabling motors that are lighter, more efficient, and more durable than a generation ago. At the same time, emergent control strategies and integration with vehicle architectures have elevated the motor from a component to a central node in overall vehicle performance and energy management. This introduction outlines the technological, regulatory, and commercial currents shaping the electric motor landscape, establishing the context for the detailed analysis that follows.
Transitioning from internal combustion to electrified powertrains has prompted a rethink of motor design priorities. Where torque density and cost once dominated, the contemporary design brief also demands thermal robustness, electromagnetic compatibility with high-power inverters, and adaptability across diverse vehicle platforms. Consequently, manufacturers are investing in scalable architectures that can be tuned for passenger cars, SUVs, and heavy commercial vehicles without sacrificing manufacturability. Complementing these engineering shifts are supply chain and policy influences that are accelerating material substitution and localization strategies. The interplay of these forces creates both opportunity and urgency for OEMs and suppliers seeking durable competitive advantage.
Understanding the decisive paradigm shifts transforming motor design, manufacturing, and integration across vehicle electrification and supply chain resilience
The last five years have seen transformative shifts that are redefining how electric motors are designed, produced, and deployed across automotive fleets. First, the broader electrification imperative has moved beyond passenger cars to include commercial vehicles, creating demand for motors optimized for sustained duty cycles and higher thermal loads. This has driven renewed interest in motor topologies that can balance efficiency with ruggedness under continuous heavy load. Second, magnet material dynamics and raw material geopolitics have catalyzed diversification in motor type selection; manufacturers are increasingly weighing permanent magnet solutions against induction and switched reluctance options to manage cost volatility and supply risk while preserving performance targets.
Third, system-level integration is reshaping component boundaries. Motors are increasingly engineered in tandem with inverters, cooling systems, and software-defined controls to extract efficiency gains and enable features such as torque vectoring and predictive thermal management. Fourth, manufacturing trends toward modular, scalable production cells and increased automation are shortening time-to-market and supporting higher part complexity without proportional cost penalties. Finally, digitalization across design, simulation, and production-from advanced multiphysics modeling to in-line quality analytics-has compressed development cycles and improved reliability forecasts. Together, these shifts are creating a more competitive and innovation-driven market where agility and systems thinking determine winners.
Assessing the cumulative effects of new United States tariff measures through 2025 on procurement strategies, production localization, and motor architecture choices
Recent tariff policies implemented by the United States through 2025 have introduced a layer of complexity to the automotive electric motor ecosystem, influencing sourcing decisions, cost structures, and supplier strategies. Tariffs aimed at specific components and raw materials have incentivized OEMs and tier suppliers to reassess procurement footprints and to accelerate nearshoring and regional sourcing initiatives. In response, many manufacturers have diversified supplier bases and adjusted production allocations to mitigate exposure to tariff-driven cost increases and trade frictions. These recalibrations have been particularly pronounced for subcomponents that rely on imported magnet materials, specialized laminations, or precision components produced in regions affected by tariff measures.
Moreover, tariffs have reinforced the strategic appeal of motor architectures that reduce reliance on constrained inputs. For example, where permanent magnet motors depend on rare-earth materials that may be subject to trade measures, some manufacturers have expanded development of induction and switched reluctance motors as hedges against supply and cost uncertainty. In parallel, tariffs have affected logistics and inventory strategies, prompting increased investment in localized warehousing and buffer inventories to smooth production continuity. While tariffs have raised near-term operational costs for some players, they have also accelerated industrial policy responses, public-private partnerships, and capital allocation toward domestic capacity expansion, creating a rebalanced landscape in which regional manufacturing competitiveness and supplier resilience increasingly shape commercial outcomes.
Driving strategic product differentiation by integrating motor type, vehicle application, power class, cooling approach, and phase configuration into cohesive segmentation insights
A nuanced understanding of segmentation is essential for aligning product strategy with end-user requirements and regulatory constraints. When considering motor type, differentiation between induction motor variants such as squirrel cage and wound rotor informs trade-offs in robustness and control complexity, while permanent magnet topologies, split into interior and surface magnet constructions, determine torque density and thermal management approaches. Switched reluctance motors present a distinct path prioritizing simplicity and reduced dependence on magnetic materials, which can be advantageous in contexts of material volatility.
Vehicle type segmentation highlights divergent performance priorities: commercial vehicles, split into heavy and light categories, demand sustained thermal performance and high duty-cycle durability, whereas passenger vehicle segments-hatchback, sedan, and SUV-prioritize cost-efficient packaging, NVH performance, and driving dynamics. Power output segmentation into high, medium, and low power classes further refines engineering choices, since thermal systems, cooling methods, and control strategies scale nonlinearly with continuous power demands. Application-driven segmentation separates auxiliary motors, exemplified by HVAC blower and power steering applications that prioritize compactness and low-noise operation, from traction motors where configurations such as all-wheel drive, front axle, and rear axle traction motors define torque distribution strategies and axle-level integration constraints. Cooling method segmentation distinguishes air-cooled and liquid-cooled approaches, which carry implications for packaging, heat rejection, and peak power capability. Lastly, phase type segmentation into single-phase and three-phase motors affects inverter complexity and harmonic management, with three-phase systems dominating high-performance traction applications and single-phase units remaining relevant for selected auxiliary functions. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables targeted product roadmaps that reconcile material availability, cost objectives, and vehicle architecture constraints.
Navigating distinct regional imperatives that shape manufacturing localization, regulatory compliance, and product engineering across global markets
Regional dynamics are reshaping investment priorities, production strategies, and go-to-market approaches across the global electric motor landscape. In the Americas, policies encouraging electric vehicle adoption and domestic industrial investment have stimulated interest in localized capacity for both core motors and associated power electronics. This regional push is coupled with logistical advantages for serving North and South American OEMs and an appetite for collaborations that reduce exposure to transoceanic supply chain disruptions. Consequently, manufacturers with nearshore manufacturing capabilities and adaptable production cells are well positioned to capitalize on fleet electrification in commercial and passenger segments.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory stringency on emissions and a focus on energy transition have accelerated demand for high-efficiency motor platforms, while automotive OEMs in Europe emphasize integration with vehicle control systems to meet stringent lifecycle and sustainability criteria. Investment patterns here favor high-precision production and advanced materials research. In the Asia-Pacific region, dense manufacturing ecosystems and extensive component supplier networks continue to drive scale advantages, particularly for magnet-dependent motor architectures; at the same time, rapid adoption of electric two- and four-wheel vehicles has incentivized innovation in compact and cost-efficient motor designs. Taken together, regional conditions are prompting differentiated strategies: capacity expansion and localization in the Americas, precision and regulatory alignment in Europe, Middle East & Africa, and scale-driven cost optimization and rapid product iteration in Asia-Pacific.
Evaluating competitive positioning where hardware innovation, system integration, and supply chain control determine long-term leadership in motor technologies
Competitive dynamics among motor manufacturers and suppliers reflect both technological specialization and strategic positioning across the value chain. Leading firms are advancing platform approaches that allow a single motor architecture to be adapted across multiple vehicle types and power classes, thereby improving margin resilience and accelerating time-to-market. Some companies concentrate on high-torque-density permanent magnet solutions optimized for passenger vehicles and performance applications, while others invest in robust induction or switched reluctance platforms tailored for commercial vehicle duty cycles where longevity and thermal resilience are paramount. Beyond pure-play motor manufacturers, system integrators offering combined motor-inverter assemblies and thermal management packages are gaining traction by simplifying OEM supply chains and enabling faster integration at the vehicle level.
Supplier strategies also include vertical moves into magnet recycling and material sourcing to reduce exposure to raw material volatility, and partnerships with semiconductor and control software firms to enhance the electronic and algorithmic capabilities of motor systems. Service providers offering predictive maintenance analytics and digital twins are creating aftermarket value propositions that extend the lifecycle economics of deployed motors. The competitive landscape is therefore characterized by a blend of hardware innovation, software-enabled differentiation, and supply chain control measures that collectively determine which players capture value as electrification continues to scale.
Actionable strategic priorities for manufacturers to secure resilience, scale, and integrated product leadership across evolving automotive electrification demands
Industry leaders must take deliberate actions to translate market signals into sustainable advantage. First, firms should prioritize architecture modularity that enables a single motor platform to be scaled across power outputs and vehicle types, thereby reducing engineering overhead and inventory diversity. Concurrently, investing in alternative motor topologies and material substitution programs will mitigate risk from rare-earth concentration and tariff-driven supply disruptions. Companies should also strengthen partnerships with inverter and control software providers to deliver integrated motor-electronics packages that streamline OEM integration and improve overall system efficiency.
Operationally, leaders should accelerate localization strategies that align production footprints with key demand centers, reducing lead times and exposure to trade barriers. Manufacturing investments should combine automation with flexible cell design to handle both volume production and limited-run specialized variants. From a commercial perspective, expanding offerings to include digital services-such as predictive maintenance, fleet analytics, and lifecycle optimization-can unlock recurring revenue streams and deepen customer relationships. Finally, proactive engagement with policy makers and participation in industry standards bodies will help shape regulatory and trade environments in ways that support long-term product and investment planning. Taken together, these actions form a coherent playbook for capturing value amid technological and geopolitical disruption.
Robust mixed-method research approach combining primary expert engagement, technology assessment, and scenario analysis to underpin strategic recommendations
This research synthesizes engineering literature, industry announcements, patent filings, supplier disclosures, and expert interviews to build a holistic view of the automotive electric motor sector. Primary research included structured discussions with design engineers, procurement leads, and aftermarket managers from OEMs and tier suppliers, supplemented by consultations with materials scientists and power electronics specialists to validate technical performance trade-offs. Secondary research drew on recent regulatory texts, industry white papers, and publicly available corporate filings to establish timelines for policy shifts and capital deployment.
Analytical methods combined qualitative scenario analysis with comparative technology assessment, emphasizing the interplay of thermal management, material dependencies, and system-level integration. Sensitivity analysis was applied to procurement and supply chain assumptions to identify critical risk vectors, while case studies illustrated how leading manufacturers have implemented modular architectures and localization strategies. Throughout, data quality controls and cross-validation with multiple independent sources were employed to ensure robustness of conclusions. This methodology facilitates actionable insights that bridge technical feasibility with strategic commercial considerations for stakeholders evaluating motor technologies and supply chain configurations.
Summarizing the strategic imperatives where integrated engineering, supply chain resilience, and digital services determine competitive outcomes
In conclusion, the automotive electric motor landscape is undergoing a period of rapid reconfiguration driven by technological innovation, shifting policy frameworks, and evolving commercial imperatives. Motor design is increasingly evaluated as part of a cohesive vehicle system, demanding integration across electrical, thermal, and software domains. Concurrently, geopolitical and trade dynamics, including tariff measures, are reshaping supply chains and accelerating localization and material substitution strategies. Firms that balance platform modularity, supply chain resilience, and systems-level integration will be best positioned to meet diverse vehicle requirements while controlling cost and risk.
Looking ahead, strategic differentiation will arise from the ability to deliver integrated motor-electronics-thermal solutions, to harness digital services for lifecycle value, and to respond nimbly to regional policy signals. Manufacturers that invest in alternative motor topologies, strengthen material sourcing strategies, and cultivate partnerships across the software and semiconductor ecosystem can convert disruption into opportunity. Ultimately, success will depend not only on technical excellence but on the alignment of engineering decisions with procurement flexibility, manufacturing agility, and customer-centric commercial models.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Advancement in high-efficiency permanent magnet motor designs for EV drivetrains with reduced rare earth usage
- 5.2. Integration of motor control units with vehicle central computing platforms for enhanced system optimization
- 5.3. Development of axial flux motors offering higher power density for electric vehicle applications
- 5.4. Adoption of silicon carbide in inverter modules to enable higher operating voltages and improved motor efficiency
- 5.5. Modular motor architectures supporting scalability across different electric vehicle segments and power classes
- 5.6. Implementation of intelligent motor thermal management systems to prolong component life and performance
- 5.7. Emergence of in-wheel electric motors for improved vehicle dynamics and direct chassis integration
- 5.8. Use of additive manufacturing techniques for complex motor stator and rotor components to reduce production costs
- 5.9. Growth of collaborative partnerships between OEMs and motor technology startups to accelerate innovation
- 5.10. Standardization of motor testing protocols and performance benchmarks to streamline regulatory compliance
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Automotive Electric Motors Market, by Motor Type
- 8.1. Induction Motor
- 8.2. Permanent Magnet Motor
- 8.3. Switched Reluctance Motor
- 9. Automotive Electric Motors Market, by Vehicle Type
- 9.1. Commercial Vehicle
- 9.1.1. Heavy Commercial Vehicle
- 9.1.2. Light Commercial Vehicle
- 9.2. Passenger Vehicle
- 9.2.1. Hatchback
- 9.2.2. Sedan
- 9.2.3. SUV
- 10. Automotive Electric Motors Market, by Power Output
- 10.1. High Power Motor
- 10.2. Low Power Motor
- 10.3. Medium Power Motor
- 11. Automotive Electric Motors Market, by Application
- 11.1. Auxiliary Motor
- 11.1.1. HVAC Blower Motor
- 11.1.2. Power Steering Motor
- 11.2. Traction Motor
- 11.2.1. All Wheel Drive Traction Motor
- 11.2.2. Front Axle Traction Motor
- 11.2.3. Rear Axle Traction Motor
- 12. Automotive Electric Motors Market, by Cooling Method
- 12.1. Air Cooled Motor
- 12.2. Liquid Cooled Motor
- 13. Automotive Electric Motors Market, by Phase Type
- 13.1. Single Phase Motor
- 13.2. Three Phase Motor
- 14. Automotive Electric Motors Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Automotive Electric Motors Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Automotive Electric Motors Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. ABB Ltd.
- 17.3.2. AMETEK Inc.
- 17.3.3. Anaheim Automation, Inc.
- 17.3.4. ARC Systems, Inc.
- 17.3.5. BorgWarner Inc.
- 17.3.6. Brook Crompton Group
- 17.3.7. Bühler Motor GmbH
- 17.3.8. Continental AG
- 17.3.9. DENSO Corporation
- 17.3.10. Emerson Electric Co.
- 17.3.11. Faulhaber GmbH & Co. KG
- 17.3.12. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.
- 17.3.13. General Motors Company
- 17.3.14. Hitachi Ltd.
- 17.3.15. Johnson Electric Holdings Limited
- 17.3.16. Maxon Motor AG
- 17.3.17. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
- 17.3.18. Motor Specialty Inc.
- 17.3.19. Nidec Corporation
- 17.3.20. Regal Rexnord Corporation
- 17.3.21. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 17.3.22. Rockwell Automation, Inc.
- 17.3.23. Schneider Electric SE
- 17.3.24. Siemens AG
- 17.3.25. Toshiba Corporation
- 17.3.26. Valeo SA
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
