Report cover image

Automated Quotation System Market by Product Type (Hardware, Services, Software), Deployment Model (Cloud, Hybrid, On Premises), Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2026-2032

Publisher 360iResearch
Published Jan 13, 2026
Length 190 Pages
SKU # IRE20754654

Description

The Automated Quotation System Market was valued at USD 4.58 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 5.09 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 13.67%, reaching USD 11.24 billion by 2032.

Automated quotation systems are becoming the operational backbone of modern selling, balancing speed, accuracy, compliance, and margin control at scale

Automated quotation systems have moved from being a niche efficiency tool to becoming a frontline engine for commercial execution. As buying journeys digitize and sales cycles compress, organizations are expected to provide fast, consistent, and compliant quotes across products, configurations, and customer segments. In parallel, margin pressure and supply volatility have elevated pricing discipline from a finance concern to a board-level topic, making quoting accuracy and governance central to competitiveness.

What makes this market particularly consequential is that quoting sits at the intersection of revenue growth and operational risk. A quote is not only a price; it is a promise about lead times, service levels, contractual terms, and product eligibility. When these elements are handled manually or spread across disconnected tools, teams experience rework, approval bottlenecks, inconsistent discounting, and exposure to compliance failures. As a result, many enterprises are now treating quote automation as a strategic platform decision rather than a departmental software purchase.

This executive summary frames the current dynamics shaping automated quotation adoption, explains the structural shifts redefining solution expectations, and outlines the implications of trade policy and tariffs for 2025. It also highlights segmentation patterns, regional considerations, competitive positioning themes among vendors, and practical recommendations for leaders who must modernize quoting while maintaining control and agility.

The market is shifting from simple quote creation to governed, omnichannel revenue workflows with API-first integration, analytics, and configurable agility

The landscape has shifted from basic quote generation toward end-to-end revenue workflow orchestration. Earlier generations of tools focused on producing a document or calculating a price from a static rule set. Today’s expectations encompass guided selling, configuration intelligence, dynamic pricing, automated approvals, contract-ready terms, and seamless handoffs to order management and billing. Consequently, the differentiation is no longer simply “can the system create a quote,” but “can the system reliably govern revenue decisions across channels, geographies, and product complexity.”

At the same time, buying behavior is reshaping how quotation capability must be delivered. Customers increasingly expect self-service quoting experiences in portals and e-commerce environments, while sales teams need assisted workflows for complex deals. This has intensified demand for headless architectures and API-first integration so the same pricing and configuration logic can power multiple front ends. In practice, organizations are standardizing the quote engine while diversifying the experiences through which quotes are requested, negotiated, and accepted.

Another transformative change is the fusion of data-driven decisioning into quoting. Machine learning is being used to recommend discount ranges, flag outlier deals, and predict approval risk based on historical patterns. However, the most successful deployments treat analytics as a decision support layer rather than an opaque “black box.” Governance remains critical, especially where regulated products, public sector procurement rules, or stringent audit requirements apply.

Finally, implementation and operating models are evolving. Enterprises are moving away from heavy customization that creates long-term rigidity, and toward configurable rule frameworks, reusable templates, and modular integration patterns. This shift reflects a desire to reduce technical debt and accelerate iteration as products, channels, and pricing strategies change. As a result, vendor evaluation increasingly centers on how quickly a solution can adapt without destabilizing core controls.

Cumulative tariff pressures in 2025 are driving stronger landed-cost integration, flexible commercial terms, and audit-ready governance within quoting workflows

United States tariff dynamics in 2025 are expected to continue influencing how organizations structure prices, manage product eligibility, and communicate commercial terms. While tariff coverage and rates vary by category and origin, the practical implication for quoting is consistent: businesses need the ability to reflect landed-cost changes quickly and defensibly, without forcing sales teams into manual workarounds that erode trust and margin.

A cumulative impact emerges when tariffs intersect with multi-tier supply chains. Components may be sourced from multiple countries, and final assembly may occur elsewhere, making origin determination and cost attribution more complex than simply tagging a product with a single country code. Automated quotation systems are therefore being pressed to work in tandem with product information management, trade compliance, and ERP data so that quotes incorporate accurate duty assumptions, surcharges, or alternative part options when applicable.

In addition, tariff uncertainty changes customer negotiation behavior. Buyers may demand shorter price validity windows, request tariff pass-through clauses, or ask for separate line items that clarify what is subject to change. Quoting platforms must support these commercial constructs through flexible templates, clause libraries, and policy-driven approvals. This is especially important in industries where contracts are awarded through competitive bids and pricing transparency is required.

Over time, the operational burden of tariffs can accumulate into a strategic need for segmentation of pricing logic. Organizations often adopt differentiated approaches by customer tier, contract type, or region, balancing competitiveness with risk. Automated quotation capability helps by enabling consistent application of policies, clear audit trails, and rapid scenario evaluation. As 2025 unfolds, the winners are likely to be those who treat tariffs not as an occasional exception but as an ongoing variable that must be operationalized through rules, data, and governance.

Segmentation reveals distinct needs by quoting complexity, pricing sophistication, deployment model, and governance maturity shaping adoption and platform fit

Segmentation patterns in automated quotation are best understood by examining how organizations differ in quoting complexity, channel strategy, and governance intensity. Solutions adopted for high-velocity, standardized offerings tend to emphasize rapid quote turnaround, minimal touch approvals, and tight integration with digital storefronts, while environments with engineered-to-order or heavily configurable portfolios prioritize guided selling, dependency management, and structured collaboration between sales and technical teams. As a result, the maturity of configuration rules and the availability of clean product data frequently determine how quickly value can be realized.

Across buying types, organizations also segment by the degree of pricing sophistication they require. Some operate with centrally managed price books and controlled discount bands, whereas others need real-time pricing that reacts to commodity costs, inventory constraints, customer commitments, or competitive conditions. In these cases, the ability to separate pricing strategy from execution becomes critical, allowing pricing teams to update logic without disrupting sales operations. Approval design also varies meaningfully: high-compliance segments favor multi-step, role-based approvals and exception handling with complete audit logs, while growth-oriented segments may optimize for speed with targeted guardrails.

Deployment and integration preferences create another layer of segmentation. Some buyers prioritize cloud-native rollout speed and standardized best practices, while others require hybrid connectivity for legacy ERP, custom order systems, or specialized contract repositories. Similarly, organizations with multiple sales motions segment their needs between self-serve experiences that generate instant quotes and assisted selling workflows that handle negotiated terms, bundles, and professional services. The most resilient strategies use a single source of truth for configuration and pricing while exposing it through distinct experiences aligned to user roles.

Finally, segmentation emerges through organizational structure and change capacity. Enterprises with centralized commercial operations can enforce global policies quickly, while federated organizations must balance local autonomy with standardization. Automated quotation systems that support policy inheritance, localized rules, and configurable templates tend to fit these realities better than rigid one-size approaches. In practice, segmentation is less about industry labels and more about the interplay of product complexity, channel mix, compliance intensity, and the organization’s ability to govern data and processes end to end.

Regional adoption varies by compliance demands, localization needs, and channel maturity, requiring standardized core logic with controlled local flexibility

Regional dynamics in automated quotation adoption reflect differences in regulatory environments, sales channel maturity, and the complexity of cross-border commerce. In the Americas, many organizations focus on scaling omnichannel experiences while tightening discount governance and improving integration between quoting and downstream order execution. The region’s emphasis on speed-to-quote and revenue accountability often accelerates adoption of workflow automation, analytics, and standardized policy controls.

In Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, localization and compliance frequently play a larger role in platform selection. Language support, tax handling, invoice and contract conventions, and data governance expectations shape implementation choices. Cross-border selling within and across economic areas increases the need for consistent rule management and well-defined audit trails, particularly for companies operating across multiple legal entities. Consequently, quoting solutions that accommodate regional terms while maintaining centralized oversight tend to align with enterprise needs.

Asia-Pacific presents a wide range of adoption patterns, from advanced digital commerce environments to rapidly modernizing sales organizations seeking to standardize processes. Fast growth, broad partner ecosystems, and diverse customer expectations push companies to support multiple selling motions simultaneously. In this context, scalable performance, API readiness, and the ability to support complex partner quoting scenarios become differentiators. Additionally, organizations operating across manufacturing hubs and export-driven supply chains are increasingly focused on integrating cost and availability signals into quotes.

Across regions, a common theme is the desire to reduce friction between customer intent and commercial fulfillment. However, the path to that outcome varies: some markets prioritize seamless self-service, others prioritize compliance and localization, and many require both. Leaders are responding by designing regional rollout playbooks that standardize core logic while allowing controlled variations in terms, taxes, currencies, and approval pathways.

Vendors compete on configuration depth, integration ecosystems, governed workflows, and decision support that improves consistency without slowing selling

The competitive landscape is characterized by vendors that differentiate through depth of configuration capability, pricing intelligence, workflow governance, and ecosystem integration. Some providers lead with robust configure-price-quote foundations designed for complex products and multi-step approvals, while others emphasize rapid deployment, intuitive user experiences, and strong alignment with digital commerce. Increasingly, buyers expect vendors to support both ends of the spectrum, enabling high-velocity transactional quoting and complex negotiated deals on the same platform.

A major axis of competition is integration maturity. Leading vendors invest in connectors and reference architectures that link quoting to CRM, ERP, product data, contract lifecycle management, subscription billing, and tax engines. This matters because quotation outcomes are only as reliable as the upstream data and downstream execution they connect to. Vendors that can demonstrate proven interoperability, stable APIs, and practical implementation patterns typically reduce time-to-value and lower long-term maintenance risk.

Another differentiator is governance and compliance readiness. Enterprises seek granular controls over discounting, approvals, clause usage, and auditability, particularly in regulated sectors or public procurement contexts. Vendors that provide clear policy frameworks, role-based access, and traceability of pricing decisions tend to support stronger internal controls. At the same time, ease of change is becoming a deciding factor; buyers want to adapt rules and templates without costly redevelopment.

Finally, the market is seeing heightened attention to embedded analytics and decision support. While not all buyers will adopt advanced optimization immediately, many want tools that highlight anomalies, explain margin drivers, and surface risks early in the deal cycle. Vendors that couple these capabilities with transparent governance and practical user workflows are better positioned to meet both executive expectations and day-to-day sales realities.

Leaders can win by governing quoting as a revenue process, integrating clean data flows, supporting multiple sales motions, and building a continuous optimization loop

Industry leaders should start by treating quotation as a governed revenue process rather than a document-generation task. That means defining clear ownership across pricing, sales operations, product, legal, and finance, and then codifying policies into workflows that are measurable and enforceable. Establishing a common taxonomy for products, bundles, services, and discount reasons creates the foundation for consistent reporting and continuous improvement.

Next, prioritize data readiness and integration architecture before expanding automation scope. Clean product attributes, reliable customer hierarchies, and standardized price structures often deliver more benefit than adding advanced features prematurely. Align the quotation engine with upstream product data and downstream order capture so that what is promised can be fulfilled without manual interpretation. Where tariff and trade complexity is material, integrate landed-cost signals and ensure quote templates can express conditionality and validity windows in a customer-friendly way.

Leaders should also design for multiple selling motions from the outset. Self-service journeys require fast calculation and simple guardrails, while enterprise deals require collaboration, versioning, and structured approvals. A unified rules layer that serves both reduces duplication and helps maintain consistent pricing discipline across channels. In parallel, adopt enablement as a continuous program: train sales teams not only on tool usage, but on policy rationale so adoption is durable.

Finally, build an optimization loop. Use workflow data to identify bottlenecks, common exception paths, and leakage points such as uncontrolled discounting or inconsistent terms. Implement analytics that highlight outliers and guide action, but keep humans accountable for decisions. Over time, this approach turns quoting into a strategic control point that improves customer experience while protecting margin and reducing operational risk.

A structured methodology combines stakeholder input, capability evaluation, and triangulated validation to connect quoting technology with operational outcomes

The research methodology for this report combines structured market observation with detailed analysis of product capabilities, adoption drivers, and procurement behavior. The approach begins by mapping the automated quotation value chain, including how quoting interacts with configuration, pricing, approvals, contracting, and order execution. This framework ensures that findings reflect operational realities rather than viewing quoting as a standalone tool.

Insights are developed through a combination of primary engagement and secondary review. Primary inputs include discussions with industry stakeholders such as practitioners, solution providers, implementation specialists, and commercial operations leaders, focused on identifying recurring pain points, deployment patterns, and decision criteria. Secondary inputs include analysis of public product documentation, regulatory and trade policy updates relevant to quoting requirements, vendor materials, and reported enterprise digitization initiatives.

To ensure consistency, the research applies a structured evaluation lens that examines functional breadth, integration readiness, governance capabilities, deployment flexibility, and change management considerations. The methodology also incorporates triangulation, where themes are validated across multiple inputs to reduce single-source bias. Throughout, the emphasis remains on actionable interpretation of trends, constraints, and best practices that affect real-world adoption.

This approach supports a balanced view of the market by connecting technology capability to operational outcomes such as speed-to-quote, pricing consistency, compliance alignment, and resilience under policy and cost volatility.

The path forward favors integrated, governed, and adaptable quoting platforms that protect margin, improve experience, and sustain agility under volatility

Automated quotation systems are increasingly central to how organizations sell, govern pricing, and translate customer demand into executable commitments. The market’s direction is clear: quoting must be fast, omnichannel, and deeply integrated, while also being auditable and adaptable to shifting costs, policies, and regulatory constraints. As expectations rise, tools that merely generate quotes are giving way to platforms that orchestrate the entire pre-order decision process.

The cumulative effects of tariffs and broader supply volatility in 2025 reinforce the need for quoting that is grounded in reliable data and controlled policies. Organizations that can update pricing logic quickly, communicate terms transparently, and maintain traceable approvals are better positioned to protect margins and preserve customer trust. Meanwhile, segmentation and regional differences underscore that successful adoption depends on aligning capabilities to selling motions, compliance demands, and rollout realities.

Ultimately, leaders who approach quoting modernization as both a technology and operating model transformation will be best equipped to deliver consistent customer experiences, reduce internal friction, and build durable commercial agility in an increasingly complex environment.

Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year

Table of Contents

190 Pages
1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
2.2.1. Primary Research
2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
5. Market Insights
5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Automated Quotation System Market, by Product Type
8.1. Hardware
8.1.1. Networking Equipment
8.1.1.1. Routers
8.1.1.2. Switches
8.1.2. Servers
8.1.3. Storage Devices
8.2. Services
8.2.1. Consulting
8.2.2. Implementation
8.2.2.1. Customization
8.2.2.2. Integration
8.2.3. Maintenance
8.3. Software
8.3.1. Application Software
8.3.1.1. Crm
8.3.1.2. Erp
8.3.1.3. Office Suite
8.3.2. Security Software
8.3.3. System Software
9. Automated Quotation System Market, by Deployment Model
9.1. Cloud
9.1.1. Private Cloud
9.1.2. Public Cloud
9.2. Hybrid
9.3. On Premises
10. Automated Quotation System Market, by Industry Vertical
10.1. BFSI
10.2. Government
10.3. Healthcare
10.4. It & Telecom
10.5. Manufacturing
10.6. Retail
11. Automated Quotation System Market, by Region
11.1. Americas
11.1.1. North America
11.1.2. Latin America
11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
11.2.1. Europe
11.2.2. Middle East
11.2.3. Africa
11.3. Asia-Pacific
12. Automated Quotation System Market, by Group
12.1. ASEAN
12.2. GCC
12.3. European Union
12.4. BRICS
12.5. G7
12.6. NATO
13. Automated Quotation System Market, by Country
13.1. United States
13.2. Canada
13.3. Mexico
13.4. Brazil
13.5. United Kingdom
13.6. Germany
13.7. France
13.8. Russia
13.9. Italy
13.10. Spain
13.11. China
13.12. India
13.13. Japan
13.14. Australia
13.15. South Korea
14. United States Automated Quotation System Market
15. China Automated Quotation System Market
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
16.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
16.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
16.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
16.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
16.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
16.5. Adobe Inc
16.6. Bitrix24
16.7. Cincom Systems Inc.
16.8. Conga
16.9. ConnectWise LLC
16.10. Coupa Software
16.11. DealHub
16.12. Experlogix Inc.
16.13. HubSpot
16.14. Infor
16.15. International Business Machines Corporation
16.16. Keap
16.17. Microsoft Corporation
16.18. Model N Inc.
16.19. Odoo
16.20. Oracle Corporation
16.21. PandaDoc Inc.
16.22. PROS Holdings Inc.
16.23. Quoter Software
16.24. Qwilr
16.25. Salesforce.com Inc.
16.26. SAP SE
16.27. Tacton
16.28. Vendavo
16.29. Zoho Corporation
16.30. Zuora Inc
How Do Licenses Work?
Request A Sample
Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.