Automated Parking Management Systems Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Type (Automated Guided Vehicle Parking System, Crane Parking System, Puzzle Parking System), Automation Level, Platform Type, Parking Level, End Use - Global Forecast
Description
The Automated Parking Management Systems Market was valued at USD 2.10 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.35 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 12.39%, reaching USD 5.35 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction to the strategic context technological drivers stakeholder dynamics and core operational objectives shaping automated parking management systems
Automated parking management systems have evolved from niche engineering feats into strategic urban infrastructure components that address capacity constraints, operational inefficiencies, and shifting mobility expectations. The introduction contextualizes the technological, regulatory, and behavioral forces that are converging to elevate automated parking solutions from pilot projects to institutionalized deployments in dense urban nodes, transport hubs, and mixed-use developments. It emphasizes the interplay between system architects, property owners, municipal planners, and service operators, and explains how each stakeholder’s priorities-ranging from maximizing throughput to minimizing lifecycle costs-shape procurement choices and integration strategies.
To frame the discussion, the introduction outlines core capability trends such as increased sensor fidelity, more resilient control software, and modular hardware design that simplify retrofits and upgrades. It also highlights the changing customer expectations for seamless user experiences and digital-first interactions, which increasingly influence adoption. By situating automated parking within broader smart-city and mobility ecosystems, the introduction prepares readers to understand how operational metrics, regulatory compliance, and end-user adoption will determine longer-term success. Ultimately, this section sets the stage for the subsequent analysis by clarifying key definitions, recurring design trade-offs, and the primary value propositions that automated parking management systems must deliver to remain commercially viable and operationally resilient.
Analysis of technological advances policy pressures and commercial model evolution reshaping automated parking management and delivery across urban infrastructures
The landscape for automated parking management is undergoing transformative shifts driven by advances in sensing technologies, tighter urban regulations, and an intensified focus on sustainability and user experience. Emerging sensor arrays and higher-resolution imaging are improving vehicle detection and system reliability, while edge computing and improved control firmware are reducing latency and enabling more complex orchestration across multi-level facilities. Simultaneously, urban authorities are tightening land-use rules and emission-related policies, which is prompting developers and operators to prioritize solutions that lower parking footprints and support modal shifts to shared mobility.
These shifts are accompanied by new commercial models that emphasize service-level agreements, remote monitoring, and integrated mobility-as-a-service offerings, which in turn are changing procurement criteria. As a result, vendors are adapting by delivering more modular hardware, subscription-based software, and scalable maintenance programs. Transitional challenges remain, particularly around legacy system integration and workforce reskilling, but the net effect is a landscape in which technological maturity and policy alignment are enabling deployments that were previously impractical. In short, the sector is moving from isolated installations toward interconnected, policy-aware platforms that optimize asset utilization, reduce operational overhead, and deliver measurable improvements in the urban mobility experience.
Implications of recent United States tariff measures on procurement sourcing strategies supply chain resilience and localized manufacturing approaches for automated parking projects
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in the United States has introduced new variables into procurement strategies, supplier selection, and supply chain design for automated parking systems. Tariff-related cost pressures are prompting stakeholders to reconsider sourcing pathways and to evaluate alternative manufacturing locations or component substitutions that preserve performance while moderating landed cost. Procurement teams are increasingly incorporating total landed cost analysis and longer lead-time planning to mitigate tariff volatility and to ensure project timelines remain achievable despite customs-related uncertainties.
In response, suppliers have been refining their bill-of-materials transparency, offering localized assembly services, and establishing regional service hubs to reduce cross-border dependencies. These adjustments have meaningful operational implications: project managers now place greater emphasis on phased rollouts, compatibility with locally procured hardware, and standardized interfaces that allow components to be swapped with minimal redesign. Moreover, tariff impacts are accelerating conversations about regional partnerships and joint ventures that can localize high-value manufacturing steps. While tariffs add complexity to vendor evaluation, they also catalyze supply chain resilience and strategic localization, ultimately influencing which suppliers can offer the most reliable, compliant, and supportable solutions over the lifecycle of a deployment.
In-depth segmentation framework aligning component categories system archetypes automation tiers platform variants parking heights and diverse end-use scenarios
Segmentation analysis provides an essential lens through which to evaluate technology fit, operational trade-offs, and procurement priorities for automated parking management. Based on Component, market studies consider Hardware, Services, and Software, with the Hardware category further delineated into Cameras, Controllers, Elevators, Pallets, and Sensors; this framework clarifies where capital expenditure and recurring service obligations fall, while highlighting the critical interdependencies between physical assets and control logic. Based on Type, evaluations include Automated Guided Vehicle Parking Systems, Crane Parking Systems, Puzzle Parking Systems, Rail Guided Parking Systems, Rotary Parking Systems, Shuttle Parking Systems, Silo Parking Systems, and Stacker Parking Systems, a taxonomy that helps match spatial constraints and throughput requirements to the operational characteristics of each system form factor.
Based on Automation Level, analysis distinguishes Fully Automatic from Semi-automatic implementations, emphasizing the trade-offs between throughput, user experience, and redundancy planning. Based on Platform Type, differentiation between Non-palleted and Palleted solutions illuminates maintenance regimes and vehicle accommodation considerations. Based on Parking Level, segmentation into Less Than Level 5, Levels 5-10, and More than Level 10 informs decisions about structural integration and vertical logistics complexity. Finally, Based on End Use, the market is separated into Commercial and Residential, with Commercial further examined across Airports, Malls, and Offices, thereby aligning product specifications and service models to end-customer expectations and operational cadences. Together, these segmentation dimensions enable more precise value propositions, clearer procurement criteria, and targeted product development pathways.
Comparative regional analysis highlighting distinct adoption drivers regulatory landscapes and deployment archetypes across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics shape adoption pathways, regulatory requirements, and supplier ecosystems for automated parking management systems in distinct ways. In the Americas, urban densification trends, legacy parking stock, and a strong emphasis on private developer-led projects drive demand for retrofit-friendly modular systems and service-based contracts that reduce upfront capital exposure. Regulatory frameworks and incentives in certain jurisdictions encourage integrations with electric vehicle charging infrastructure and low-emission zones, prompting solution providers to bundle energy management and emissions compliance capabilities into their offerings. As a result, market participants in this region tend to prioritize ease of integration, retrofitability, and clear maintenance commitments.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a highly heterogeneous environment where historic urban cores, diverse regulatory regimes, and ambitious sustainability targets create both complexity and opportunity. In many European cities, strict land-use policies and parking management schemes favor compact, high-efficiency automated solutions that reduce surface parking. The Middle East features large-scale new developments with the space and capital to invest in high-throughput, architecturally integrated systems, while parts of Africa are seeing pilot deployments tied to urban renewal projects and commercial hubs. Asia-Pacific exhibits intense adoption momentum driven by dense megacities, sophisticated manufacturing bases, and a willingness among property developers to adopt vertically integrated smart building systems. In this region, suppliers often couple high-volume manufacturing capabilities with rapid innovation cycles, making Asia-Pacific a focal point for both product iteration and large-scale implementations. Collectively, these regional distinctions influence vendor strategies, partnership formations, and localized service models.
Insights into competitive differentiators supplier capabilities and partnership strategies that determine success in large-scale automated parking deployments
Competitive dynamics in the automated parking sector are defined by a combination of engineering depth, systems integration capabilities, and service delivery models. Leading firms distinguish themselves not only through proprietary mechanical designs or control algorithms but also by their ability to offer robust lifecycle services, remote diagnostics, and performance guarantees. Strategic differentiators include modular hardware architectures that simplify maintenance, open-standard software interfaces that permit third-party integrations, and comprehensive training and certification programs for operator personnel. Partnerships with construction firms, facility managers, and local service providers further extend a supplier’s ability to capture complex projects and ensure timely commissioning.
In addition, companies that invest in rigorous testing, safety validation, and regulatory compliance frameworks tend to achieve faster permit approvals and higher customer confidence. Suppliers offering adaptable commercial terms-such as outcome-based pricing, extended warranties, and bundled maintenance contracts-are increasingly preferred by asset owners seeking predictable operating expenditure. Finally, those with established regional support networks and demonstrated success in delivering large or technically complex installations are well positioned to win repeat business, as clients look to minimize operational risk and secure long-term service continuity.
Actionable strategic recommendations for leadership to enhance modularity interoperability localized operations and customer-aligned commercial models in automated parking
Industry leaders should pursue a multi-pronged strategy to accelerate adoption, reduce operational risk, and strengthen competitive positioning. First, prioritize modular, upgradeable designs that allow phased deployment and easier integration with legacy infrastructure; this reduces implementation barriers and lowers the total disruption associated with retrofits. Second, invest in software openness and API-driven interoperability to enable third-party service integrations, partner ecosystems, and future enhancements without requiring full system replacement. Third, proactively build regional service hubs and localized assembly capabilities to mitigate supply chain volatility, tariff exposure, and long lead times.
Moreover, leaders should offer differentiated commercial models that align incentives with asset owners, including outcome-based service agreements and predictable maintenance pricing. Concurrently, they must place emphasis on rigorous safety certifications, transparent testing protocols, and operator training programs to accelerate permitting and ensure operational reliability. Finally, cultivate strategic partnerships with urban planners, transport authorities, and energy providers to integrate parking solutions into broader mobility and sustainability initiatives. By combining technical flexibility, customer-aligned commercial terms, and deep local support, leaders can reduce adoption friction, deliver consistent performance, and capture long-term value across diverse deployment contexts.
Detailed explanation of the mixed-methods research approach including primary expert elicitation secondary technical review and reproducible analytical procedures
This research leverages a mixed-methods approach that combines qualitative expert interviews, technical literature synthesis, supplier product reviews, and case study analysis to build a comprehensive understanding of the sector. Primary data were gathered through structured conversations with system integrators, facility operators, design engineers, and regulatory authorities to capture operational realities, pain points, and adoption barriers. Secondary sources included technical white papers, standards documents, patent disclosures, and publicly available installation records to validate product capabilities and observe deployment patterns.
Analytical techniques included comparative capability mapping to assess hardware and software interoperability, supply chain traceability assessments to identify sourcing risks, and scenario-based evaluation to examine implications of policy and tariff shifts. Throughout the process, findings were cross-validated across multiple stakeholders and triangulated against documented project outcomes to enhance robustness. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions and reproducibility of key analytical steps, ensuring that conclusions are grounded in verifiable evidence and operationally relevant insights rather than speculative forecasts.
Conclusive synthesis of technological, operational, and policy considerations that determine successful deployment and long-term value realization for automated parking systems
In conclusion, automated parking management systems represent a convergence of mechanical engineering, digital control, and urban planning imperatives that together create new opportunities for capacity optimization and operational efficiency. The sector is shifting toward modular, service-oriented solutions that prioritize interoperability, localized support, and outcomes-based commercial relationships. Technological improvements in sensing, control logic, and software integration are lowering barriers to deployment, while regulatory pressures and tariff dynamics are reshaping supply chain and procurement strategies.
For stakeholders, the practical takeaway is that success depends on aligning technical specifications with regulatory requirements and end-user expectations, while adopting procurement approaches that balance initial capital expenditure with predictable lifecycle costs. As deployments scale, the ability to offer robust maintenance programs, transparent safety validation, and seamless integration with broader mobility ecosystems will become decisive competitive advantages. By focusing on these priorities, organizations can realize the operational benefits of automated parking while minimizing implementation risk and supporting long-term urban mobility objectives.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction to the strategic context technological drivers stakeholder dynamics and core operational objectives shaping automated parking management systems
Automated parking management systems have evolved from niche engineering feats into strategic urban infrastructure components that address capacity constraints, operational inefficiencies, and shifting mobility expectations. The introduction contextualizes the technological, regulatory, and behavioral forces that are converging to elevate automated parking solutions from pilot projects to institutionalized deployments in dense urban nodes, transport hubs, and mixed-use developments. It emphasizes the interplay between system architects, property owners, municipal planners, and service operators, and explains how each stakeholder’s priorities-ranging from maximizing throughput to minimizing lifecycle costs-shape procurement choices and integration strategies.
To frame the discussion, the introduction outlines core capability trends such as increased sensor fidelity, more resilient control software, and modular hardware design that simplify retrofits and upgrades. It also highlights the changing customer expectations for seamless user experiences and digital-first interactions, which increasingly influence adoption. By situating automated parking within broader smart-city and mobility ecosystems, the introduction prepares readers to understand how operational metrics, regulatory compliance, and end-user adoption will determine longer-term success. Ultimately, this section sets the stage for the subsequent analysis by clarifying key definitions, recurring design trade-offs, and the primary value propositions that automated parking management systems must deliver to remain commercially viable and operationally resilient.
Analysis of technological advances policy pressures and commercial model evolution reshaping automated parking management and delivery across urban infrastructures
The landscape for automated parking management is undergoing transformative shifts driven by advances in sensing technologies, tighter urban regulations, and an intensified focus on sustainability and user experience. Emerging sensor arrays and higher-resolution imaging are improving vehicle detection and system reliability, while edge computing and improved control firmware are reducing latency and enabling more complex orchestration across multi-level facilities. Simultaneously, urban authorities are tightening land-use rules and emission-related policies, which is prompting developers and operators to prioritize solutions that lower parking footprints and support modal shifts to shared mobility.
These shifts are accompanied by new commercial models that emphasize service-level agreements, remote monitoring, and integrated mobility-as-a-service offerings, which in turn are changing procurement criteria. As a result, vendors are adapting by delivering more modular hardware, subscription-based software, and scalable maintenance programs. Transitional challenges remain, particularly around legacy system integration and workforce reskilling, but the net effect is a landscape in which technological maturity and policy alignment are enabling deployments that were previously impractical. In short, the sector is moving from isolated installations toward interconnected, policy-aware platforms that optimize asset utilization, reduce operational overhead, and deliver measurable improvements in the urban mobility experience.
Implications of recent United States tariff measures on procurement sourcing strategies supply chain resilience and localized manufacturing approaches for automated parking projects
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in the United States has introduced new variables into procurement strategies, supplier selection, and supply chain design for automated parking systems. Tariff-related cost pressures are prompting stakeholders to reconsider sourcing pathways and to evaluate alternative manufacturing locations or component substitutions that preserve performance while moderating landed cost. Procurement teams are increasingly incorporating total landed cost analysis and longer lead-time planning to mitigate tariff volatility and to ensure project timelines remain achievable despite customs-related uncertainties.
In response, suppliers have been refining their bill-of-materials transparency, offering localized assembly services, and establishing regional service hubs to reduce cross-border dependencies. These adjustments have meaningful operational implications: project managers now place greater emphasis on phased rollouts, compatibility with locally procured hardware, and standardized interfaces that allow components to be swapped with minimal redesign. Moreover, tariff impacts are accelerating conversations about regional partnerships and joint ventures that can localize high-value manufacturing steps. While tariffs add complexity to vendor evaluation, they also catalyze supply chain resilience and strategic localization, ultimately influencing which suppliers can offer the most reliable, compliant, and supportable solutions over the lifecycle of a deployment.
In-depth segmentation framework aligning component categories system archetypes automation tiers platform variants parking heights and diverse end-use scenarios
Segmentation analysis provides an essential lens through which to evaluate technology fit, operational trade-offs, and procurement priorities for automated parking management. Based on Component, market studies consider Hardware, Services, and Software, with the Hardware category further delineated into Cameras, Controllers, Elevators, Pallets, and Sensors; this framework clarifies where capital expenditure and recurring service obligations fall, while highlighting the critical interdependencies between physical assets and control logic. Based on Type, evaluations include Automated Guided Vehicle Parking Systems, Crane Parking Systems, Puzzle Parking Systems, Rail Guided Parking Systems, Rotary Parking Systems, Shuttle Parking Systems, Silo Parking Systems, and Stacker Parking Systems, a taxonomy that helps match spatial constraints and throughput requirements to the operational characteristics of each system form factor.
Based on Automation Level, analysis distinguishes Fully Automatic from Semi-automatic implementations, emphasizing the trade-offs between throughput, user experience, and redundancy planning. Based on Platform Type, differentiation between Non-palleted and Palleted solutions illuminates maintenance regimes and vehicle accommodation considerations. Based on Parking Level, segmentation into Less Than Level 5, Levels 5-10, and More than Level 10 informs decisions about structural integration and vertical logistics complexity. Finally, Based on End Use, the market is separated into Commercial and Residential, with Commercial further examined across Airports, Malls, and Offices, thereby aligning product specifications and service models to end-customer expectations and operational cadences. Together, these segmentation dimensions enable more precise value propositions, clearer procurement criteria, and targeted product development pathways.
Comparative regional analysis highlighting distinct adoption drivers regulatory landscapes and deployment archetypes across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics shape adoption pathways, regulatory requirements, and supplier ecosystems for automated parking management systems in distinct ways. In the Americas, urban densification trends, legacy parking stock, and a strong emphasis on private developer-led projects drive demand for retrofit-friendly modular systems and service-based contracts that reduce upfront capital exposure. Regulatory frameworks and incentives in certain jurisdictions encourage integrations with electric vehicle charging infrastructure and low-emission zones, prompting solution providers to bundle energy management and emissions compliance capabilities into their offerings. As a result, market participants in this region tend to prioritize ease of integration, retrofitability, and clear maintenance commitments.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a highly heterogeneous environment where historic urban cores, diverse regulatory regimes, and ambitious sustainability targets create both complexity and opportunity. In many European cities, strict land-use policies and parking management schemes favor compact, high-efficiency automated solutions that reduce surface parking. The Middle East features large-scale new developments with the space and capital to invest in high-throughput, architecturally integrated systems, while parts of Africa are seeing pilot deployments tied to urban renewal projects and commercial hubs. Asia-Pacific exhibits intense adoption momentum driven by dense megacities, sophisticated manufacturing bases, and a willingness among property developers to adopt vertically integrated smart building systems. In this region, suppliers often couple high-volume manufacturing capabilities with rapid innovation cycles, making Asia-Pacific a focal point for both product iteration and large-scale implementations. Collectively, these regional distinctions influence vendor strategies, partnership formations, and localized service models.
Insights into competitive differentiators supplier capabilities and partnership strategies that determine success in large-scale automated parking deployments
Competitive dynamics in the automated parking sector are defined by a combination of engineering depth, systems integration capabilities, and service delivery models. Leading firms distinguish themselves not only through proprietary mechanical designs or control algorithms but also by their ability to offer robust lifecycle services, remote diagnostics, and performance guarantees. Strategic differentiators include modular hardware architectures that simplify maintenance, open-standard software interfaces that permit third-party integrations, and comprehensive training and certification programs for operator personnel. Partnerships with construction firms, facility managers, and local service providers further extend a supplier’s ability to capture complex projects and ensure timely commissioning.
In addition, companies that invest in rigorous testing, safety validation, and regulatory compliance frameworks tend to achieve faster permit approvals and higher customer confidence. Suppliers offering adaptable commercial terms-such as outcome-based pricing, extended warranties, and bundled maintenance contracts-are increasingly preferred by asset owners seeking predictable operating expenditure. Finally, those with established regional support networks and demonstrated success in delivering large or technically complex installations are well positioned to win repeat business, as clients look to minimize operational risk and secure long-term service continuity.
Actionable strategic recommendations for leadership to enhance modularity interoperability localized operations and customer-aligned commercial models in automated parking
Industry leaders should pursue a multi-pronged strategy to accelerate adoption, reduce operational risk, and strengthen competitive positioning. First, prioritize modular, upgradeable designs that allow phased deployment and easier integration with legacy infrastructure; this reduces implementation barriers and lowers the total disruption associated with retrofits. Second, invest in software openness and API-driven interoperability to enable third-party service integrations, partner ecosystems, and future enhancements without requiring full system replacement. Third, proactively build regional service hubs and localized assembly capabilities to mitigate supply chain volatility, tariff exposure, and long lead times.
Moreover, leaders should offer differentiated commercial models that align incentives with asset owners, including outcome-based service agreements and predictable maintenance pricing. Concurrently, they must place emphasis on rigorous safety certifications, transparent testing protocols, and operator training programs to accelerate permitting and ensure operational reliability. Finally, cultivate strategic partnerships with urban planners, transport authorities, and energy providers to integrate parking solutions into broader mobility and sustainability initiatives. By combining technical flexibility, customer-aligned commercial terms, and deep local support, leaders can reduce adoption friction, deliver consistent performance, and capture long-term value across diverse deployment contexts.
Detailed explanation of the mixed-methods research approach including primary expert elicitation secondary technical review and reproducible analytical procedures
This research leverages a mixed-methods approach that combines qualitative expert interviews, technical literature synthesis, supplier product reviews, and case study analysis to build a comprehensive understanding of the sector. Primary data were gathered through structured conversations with system integrators, facility operators, design engineers, and regulatory authorities to capture operational realities, pain points, and adoption barriers. Secondary sources included technical white papers, standards documents, patent disclosures, and publicly available installation records to validate product capabilities and observe deployment patterns.
Analytical techniques included comparative capability mapping to assess hardware and software interoperability, supply chain traceability assessments to identify sourcing risks, and scenario-based evaluation to examine implications of policy and tariff shifts. Throughout the process, findings were cross-validated across multiple stakeholders and triangulated against documented project outcomes to enhance robustness. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions and reproducibility of key analytical steps, ensuring that conclusions are grounded in verifiable evidence and operationally relevant insights rather than speculative forecasts.
Conclusive synthesis of technological, operational, and policy considerations that determine successful deployment and long-term value realization for automated parking systems
In conclusion, automated parking management systems represent a convergence of mechanical engineering, digital control, and urban planning imperatives that together create new opportunities for capacity optimization and operational efficiency. The sector is shifting toward modular, service-oriented solutions that prioritize interoperability, localized support, and outcomes-based commercial relationships. Technological improvements in sensing, control logic, and software integration are lowering barriers to deployment, while regulatory pressures and tariff dynamics are reshaping supply chain and procurement strategies.
For stakeholders, the practical takeaway is that success depends on aligning technical specifications with regulatory requirements and end-user expectations, while adopting procurement approaches that balance initial capital expenditure with predictable lifecycle costs. As deployments scale, the ability to offer robust maintenance programs, transparent safety validation, and seamless integration with broader mobility ecosystems will become decisive competitive advantages. By focusing on these priorities, organizations can realize the operational benefits of automated parking while minimizing implementation risk and supporting long-term urban mobility objectives.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of AI-based predictive analytics for dynamic parking demand forecasting and resource optimization
- 5.2. Integration of electric vehicle charging infrastructure within automated parking systems for enhanced sustainability
- 5.3. Deployment of real-time IoT sensor networks for accurate space occupancy detection and driver guidance
- 5.4. Implementation of autonomous robotic valet parking solutions in urban high density commercial developments
- 5.5. Utilization of cloud-based platforms and advanced cybersecurity protocols for scalable remote parking management
- 5.6. Incorporation of contactless mobile payment and digital ticketing solutions for frictionless entry and exit
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Automated Parking Management Systems Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Cameras
- 8.1.2. Controllers
- 8.1.3. Elevators
- 8.1.4. Pallets
- 8.1.5. Sensors
- 8.2. Services
- 8.3. Software
- 9. Automated Parking Management Systems Market, by Type
- 9.1. Automated Guided Vehicle Parking System
- 9.2. Crane Parking System
- 9.3. Puzzle Parking System
- 9.4. Rail Guided Parking System
- 9.5. Rotary Parking System
- 9.6. Shuttle Parking System
- 9.7. Silo Parking System
- 9.8. Stacker Parking System
- 10. Automated Parking Management Systems Market, by Automation Level
- 10.1. Fully Automatic
- 10.2. Semi-automatic
- 11. Automated Parking Management Systems Market, by Platform Type
- 11.1. Non-palleted
- 11.2. Palleted
- 12. Automated Parking Management Systems Market, by Parking Level
- 12.1. Less Than Level 5
- 12.2. Levels 5-10
- 12.3. More than Level 10
- 13. Automated Parking Management Systems Market, by End Use
- 13.1. Commercial
- 13.1.1. Airports
- 13.1.2. Malls
- 13.1.3. Offices
- 13.2. Residential
- 14. Automated Parking Management Systems Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Automated Parking Management Systems Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Automated Parking Management Systems Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Amano Corporation
- 17.3.2. City lift India Ltd.
- 17.3.3. Cleverciti Systems GmbH
- 17.3.4. Dayang Parking Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.5. EITO&Global Inc.
- 17.3.6. FATA Automation
- 17.3.7. Flowbird Group by EasyPark AB
- 17.3.8. KLAUS Multiparking GmbH
- 17.3.9. Jebsen & Jessen Group
- 17.3.10. Park Plus, Inc.
- 17.3.11. Parkmatic
- 17.3.12. Robotic Parking Systems, Inc.
- 17.3.13. Shandong Tada Auto Parking Co., LTD.
- 17.3.14. Siemens AG
- 17.3.15. SKIDATA GmbH
- 17.3.16. Skyline Parking AG by Junction Industries, Inc.
- 17.3.17. Sotefin SA
- 17.3.18. Streetline, Inc.
- 17.3.19. SWARCO AG
- 17.3.20. T2 Systems, Inc. by Verra Mobility Corporation
- 17.3.21. Unitronics Ltd.
- 17.3.22. Westfalia Technologies, Inc.
- 17.3.23. Wipro Limited
- 17.3.24. WÖHR Autoparksysteme GmbH
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
