Attack Helicopters Market by Platform Type (Dedicated Attack Helicopter, Multi-Role Combat Helicopter, Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter), Weight Class (Light Attack Helicopter, Medium Attack Helicopter, Heavy Attack Helicopter), Mission Role, Technology Le
Description
The Attack Helicopters Market was valued at USD 8.94 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 9.70 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.31%, reaching USD 18.23 billion by 2032.
A concise operational framing that explains how attack helicopters integrate weapons, sensors, and survivability enhancements to meet contemporary multi-domain combat requirements
Attack helicopters remain a core instrument of combined-arms operations, offering a unique fusion of firepower, mobility, and persistence that complements both maneuver units and expeditionary forces. Over the last decade platforms have evolved beyond traditional anti-armor roles to become sensor-rich nodes within distributed networks, capable of executing precision strikes, close air support, and layered reconnaissance missions. Modern survivability improvements, including signature reduction, active countermeasure suites, and improved lethality-to-weight ratios, have reinforced their relevance against sophisticated air defenses and increasingly contested theaters.
Given rising demand for adaptable and rapidly upgradable platforms, procurement strategies now emphasize modularity, software-defined avionics, and open systems architectures to accelerate capability insertion. Lifecycle considerations-spanning initial acquisition, sustainment, and mid-life modernization-are shaping industrial behavior, where partnerships with avionics, engine, and weapons suppliers are as consequential as the OEM design itself. Consequently, decision-makers must balance operational requirements with industrial base health, ensuring that fleet availability and upgrade pathways align with evolving doctrine and threat environments.
An authoritative overview of technological evolution, doctrinal realignment, and industrial modernization that are reshaping attack helicopter capabilities and sustainment pathways
The last several years have seen transformative shifts that are redefining the role, design priorities, and sustainment models for attack helicopter fleets. Advances in sensor fusion, electro-optical/infrared suites, and precision guided munitions have expanded mission envelopes while reducing exposure time in high-threat areas. At the same time, the rise of unmanned systems and counter-unmanned aerial system capabilities has forced integrators to re-evaluate manned-unmanned teaming concepts, creating interoperable mission systems that allow attack helicopters to act as command nodes for heterogeneous assets.
Doctrine and operational thinking have shifted toward distributed, resilient operations that favor dispersed basing, shorter logistics tails, and rapid turnaround maintenance. Industrially, digital engineering, model-based systems engineering, and additive manufacturing are shortening lead times for critical components and enabling faster repair cycles. These technological and doctrinal shifts are converging: platforms are being designed for incremental upgrades, software-enabled performance improvements, and deeper integration into joint and coalition networks, which collectively reshape procurement priorities and sustainment approaches for strategic planners.
A comprehensive analysis of how recent US tariff measures have reshaped supply chain strategies, procurement timelines, and sustainment approaches across rotary-wing defense programs
Tariff measures implemented by the United States and associated policy responses in the 2024–2025 timeframe have exerted a multilayered influence on the defense industrial base, with specific implications for rotary-wing platforms and their supply chains. Where duties or other trade measures applied to raw materials, avionics components, or subassemblies, procurement costs experienced upward pressure and program timelines required recalibration. Import-dependent vendors and primes faced immediate sourcing trade-offs, prompting some to seek domestic substitutes, dual sourcing strategies, or supply agreements with allied suppliers to mitigate exposure to additional import costs.
The cumulative effect of trade measures is not limited to unit procurement economics; it also affects lifecycle sustainment and aftermarket logistics. Increased border friction and customs complexity can lengthen lead times for spares and specialized components, elevating inventory requirements for sustainment organizations. In response, program managers and suppliers have intensified efforts to localize critical-path production, qualify alternative suppliers, and build contractual clauses that allocate tariff risk. At the strategic level, these dynamics have encouraged deeper engagement between industry and policy-makers to ensure defense readiness is preserved while broader industrial policy objectives are pursued.
Deep segmentation analysis that illuminates how platform type, end-user requirements, and application roles drive divergent design, procurement, and sustainment priorities
Segmentation-based analysis reveals distinct capability, acquisition, and sustainment pressures across different platform typologies and operational uses. Based on Type, the market is studied across Heavy, Light, and Medium, highlighting that heavy attack helicopters prioritize payload capacity, extended loiter capability, and robust survivability packages suitable for high-threat environments, while light platforms emphasize agility, lower operating cost, and exportable configurations attractive to militaries focused on counterinsurgency or border security. Medium-class designs aim to balance endurance and payload with affordability, often serving as the most versatile choice for multi-mission tasking and modular system upgrades.
Based on End User, the market is studied across Air Force, Army, and Navy, and each end user imposes unique integration and certification requirements. Army aviation remains the primary operator for attack rotorcraft, driving doctrines around battlefield maneuver and close support, whereas naval variants demand corrosion-resistant materials, foldable rotor systems, and shipboard interoperability solutions. Air forces that operate attack helicopters typically integrate them into broader expeditionary air power constructs, emphasizing aerial refueling compatibility and joint targeting links. Based on Application, the market is studied across Anti Armor Attack, Close Air Support, and Reconnaissance And Surveillance, with anti-armor missions dictating heavy anti-tank guided missiles and long-range targeting systems, close air support requiring rapid precision engagement and robust IFF protocols, and reconnaissance and surveillance placing a premium on persistent sensors, datalinks, and low-signature endurance capabilities.
A regional intelligence synthesis showing how distinct geopolitical pressures, industrial capabilities, and operational environments shape procurement choices across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics are a primary determinant of procurement rationales and industrial partnerships, with geography shaping threat perceptions, basing concepts, and interoperability imperatives. In the Americas, focus areas include sustained modernization programs driven by alliance interoperability, high-intensity training standards, and an extensive domestic industrial base that supports both OEMs and advanced subsystems manufacturing. Latin American procurement patterns tend to favor cost-effective light and medium platforms tailored for internal security, border surveillance, and disaster response, creating demand profiles distinct from those of major powers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous set of demands: European defense priorities emphasize modernization, multinational procurement cooperation, and retrofit pathways that integrate digital avionics and defensive aids; Middle Eastern customers often require enhanced range, environmental hardening, and proven lethality for expeditionary operations; and select African operators prioritize affordability, ruggedness, and simplified sustainment. Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapidly increasing investment in maritime and territorial defense capabilities, where island and littoral geographies elevate the importance of ship-capable rotary-wing solutions, longer-range munitions, and integrated ISR payloads. Across regions, interoperability, local industrial participation, and export controls remain critical variables influencing procurement strategies.
Insightful review of how original equipment manufacturers, subsystem suppliers, and aftermarket providers are aligning around integration, services, and digital resilience to capture long-term value
Corporate strategies across the rotorcraft ecosystem are increasingly oriented around systems integration, aftermarket services, and digital capability roadmaps rather than pure airframe sales. Original equipment manufacturers continue to evolve toward integrated solutions that bundle avionics, mission systems, and sustainment services, enabling longer-term revenue streams and closer operational partnerships with end users. Suppliers of engines, rotor systems, sensors, and defensive aids are investing in modular product families and qualification packages that reduce integration risk and accelerate adoption by diverse fleets.
Alliances, joint ventures, and co-development programs are becoming more prevalent as firms seek to share development risk and access regional markets through local partnerships. Aftermarket and MRO providers are expanding capabilities to include predictive maintenance analytics, digital twin services, and rapid component repair using additive manufacturing. Cybersecurity and resilience of software-defined systems are also rising to prominence, prompting companies to build hardened architectures and secure update pathways to maintain platform integrity throughout the lifecycle.
Actionable strategic priorities for executives that align supply chain hardening, digital engineering, modular architectures, and service expansion to secure competitive advantage
Industry leaders should prioritize supply chain resilience through supplier diversification and strategic stockpiling of critical components while accelerating investments in digital engineering to enable faster configuration changes. By adopting modular open systems architectures and common data standards, companies can shorten upgrade cycles and make incremental capability insertions cost-effective and politically palatable. Concurrently, firms should expand service offerings-spanning training, mission planning, and predictive maintenance-to create recurring revenue streams and deepen relationships with operators.
Engagement with coalition partners and regional suppliers will lower program risk associated with trade disruptions and expedite certification pathways for exported derivatives. Investing in secure, software-driven avionics ecosystems and clear cyber governance for fielded platforms will protect operational readiness and enable safer remote updates. Finally, commercial teams should align product roadmaps with evolving doctrinal needs-such as distributed lethality and manned-unmanned teaming-ensuring that R&D prioritizes interoperable mission systems and scalable payload options that meet both current and emergent requirements.
A transparent explanation of research methods that details primary interviews, documentary analysis, case studies, and triangulation techniques used to ensure rigor and relevance
This research synthesizes primary and secondary evidence sources, combining structured interviews with senior program managers, systems engineers, and procurement officials with open-source defense documentation and platform-specific technical literature. Data collection emphasized triangulation: insights obtained from direct conversations and supplier disclosures were cross-validated against procurement notices, certification records, and observed fleet modernization activities. Where possible, case study analyses of recent platform upgrade programs were used to identify common risk drivers, timeline impacts, and cost-objective trade-offs.
Analytical rigor was maintained through scenario testing and sensitivity analysis that explored how disruptions-such as supply chain constraints or policy shifts-propagate through procurement and sustainment chains. Limitations are clearly identified and accounted for: proprietary contract terms and classified performance data were excluded from the evidence base, and assumptions regarding program timelines were constrained to publicly verifiable milestones. Quality control measures included peer review by domain experts and iterative validation with subject-matter advisors to ensure the analysis remains robust and operationally relevant.
A decisive synthesis that highlights the necessity of modular design, supply chain agility, and strategic partnerships to sustain attack helicopter relevance and readiness
Attack helicopter capability development is at an inflection point where technological advances, doctrinal change, and industrial policy interact to shape procurement and sustainment imperatives. Platforms that prioritize modularity, software-defined avionics, and interoperability with unmanned systems will be best positioned to meet evolving operational demands. Supply chain resilience and aftermarket services will increasingly determine fleet availability and total lifecycle performance, elevating the strategic importance of integrated sustainment offerings and localized industrial partnerships.
Decision-makers should view recent trade and policy shifts as accelerants for deeper industrial cooperation rather than mere constraints. By aligning capability roadmaps with resilient sourcing strategies and by investing in digital engineering and secure software architectures, organizations can navigate near-term disruptions while building adaptive fleets capable of responding to complex, multi-domain threats. The cumulative lesson is clear: technical excellence, industrial agility, and strategic partnerships will define competitive advantage in the next phase of rotary-wing operations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise operational framing that explains how attack helicopters integrate weapons, sensors, and survivability enhancements to meet contemporary multi-domain combat requirements
Attack helicopters remain a core instrument of combined-arms operations, offering a unique fusion of firepower, mobility, and persistence that complements both maneuver units and expeditionary forces. Over the last decade platforms have evolved beyond traditional anti-armor roles to become sensor-rich nodes within distributed networks, capable of executing precision strikes, close air support, and layered reconnaissance missions. Modern survivability improvements, including signature reduction, active countermeasure suites, and improved lethality-to-weight ratios, have reinforced their relevance against sophisticated air defenses and increasingly contested theaters.
Given rising demand for adaptable and rapidly upgradable platforms, procurement strategies now emphasize modularity, software-defined avionics, and open systems architectures to accelerate capability insertion. Lifecycle considerations-spanning initial acquisition, sustainment, and mid-life modernization-are shaping industrial behavior, where partnerships with avionics, engine, and weapons suppliers are as consequential as the OEM design itself. Consequently, decision-makers must balance operational requirements with industrial base health, ensuring that fleet availability and upgrade pathways align with evolving doctrine and threat environments.
An authoritative overview of technological evolution, doctrinal realignment, and industrial modernization that are reshaping attack helicopter capabilities and sustainment pathways
The last several years have seen transformative shifts that are redefining the role, design priorities, and sustainment models for attack helicopter fleets. Advances in sensor fusion, electro-optical/infrared suites, and precision guided munitions have expanded mission envelopes while reducing exposure time in high-threat areas. At the same time, the rise of unmanned systems and counter-unmanned aerial system capabilities has forced integrators to re-evaluate manned-unmanned teaming concepts, creating interoperable mission systems that allow attack helicopters to act as command nodes for heterogeneous assets.
Doctrine and operational thinking have shifted toward distributed, resilient operations that favor dispersed basing, shorter logistics tails, and rapid turnaround maintenance. Industrially, digital engineering, model-based systems engineering, and additive manufacturing are shortening lead times for critical components and enabling faster repair cycles. These technological and doctrinal shifts are converging: platforms are being designed for incremental upgrades, software-enabled performance improvements, and deeper integration into joint and coalition networks, which collectively reshape procurement priorities and sustainment approaches for strategic planners.
A comprehensive analysis of how recent US tariff measures have reshaped supply chain strategies, procurement timelines, and sustainment approaches across rotary-wing defense programs
Tariff measures implemented by the United States and associated policy responses in the 2024–2025 timeframe have exerted a multilayered influence on the defense industrial base, with specific implications for rotary-wing platforms and their supply chains. Where duties or other trade measures applied to raw materials, avionics components, or subassemblies, procurement costs experienced upward pressure and program timelines required recalibration. Import-dependent vendors and primes faced immediate sourcing trade-offs, prompting some to seek domestic substitutes, dual sourcing strategies, or supply agreements with allied suppliers to mitigate exposure to additional import costs.
The cumulative effect of trade measures is not limited to unit procurement economics; it also affects lifecycle sustainment and aftermarket logistics. Increased border friction and customs complexity can lengthen lead times for spares and specialized components, elevating inventory requirements for sustainment organizations. In response, program managers and suppliers have intensified efforts to localize critical-path production, qualify alternative suppliers, and build contractual clauses that allocate tariff risk. At the strategic level, these dynamics have encouraged deeper engagement between industry and policy-makers to ensure defense readiness is preserved while broader industrial policy objectives are pursued.
Deep segmentation analysis that illuminates how platform type, end-user requirements, and application roles drive divergent design, procurement, and sustainment priorities
Segmentation-based analysis reveals distinct capability, acquisition, and sustainment pressures across different platform typologies and operational uses. Based on Type, the market is studied across Heavy, Light, and Medium, highlighting that heavy attack helicopters prioritize payload capacity, extended loiter capability, and robust survivability packages suitable for high-threat environments, while light platforms emphasize agility, lower operating cost, and exportable configurations attractive to militaries focused on counterinsurgency or border security. Medium-class designs aim to balance endurance and payload with affordability, often serving as the most versatile choice for multi-mission tasking and modular system upgrades.
Based on End User, the market is studied across Air Force, Army, and Navy, and each end user imposes unique integration and certification requirements. Army aviation remains the primary operator for attack rotorcraft, driving doctrines around battlefield maneuver and close support, whereas naval variants demand corrosion-resistant materials, foldable rotor systems, and shipboard interoperability solutions. Air forces that operate attack helicopters typically integrate them into broader expeditionary air power constructs, emphasizing aerial refueling compatibility and joint targeting links. Based on Application, the market is studied across Anti Armor Attack, Close Air Support, and Reconnaissance And Surveillance, with anti-armor missions dictating heavy anti-tank guided missiles and long-range targeting systems, close air support requiring rapid precision engagement and robust IFF protocols, and reconnaissance and surveillance placing a premium on persistent sensors, datalinks, and low-signature endurance capabilities.
A regional intelligence synthesis showing how distinct geopolitical pressures, industrial capabilities, and operational environments shape procurement choices across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics are a primary determinant of procurement rationales and industrial partnerships, with geography shaping threat perceptions, basing concepts, and interoperability imperatives. In the Americas, focus areas include sustained modernization programs driven by alliance interoperability, high-intensity training standards, and an extensive domestic industrial base that supports both OEMs and advanced subsystems manufacturing. Latin American procurement patterns tend to favor cost-effective light and medium platforms tailored for internal security, border surveillance, and disaster response, creating demand profiles distinct from those of major powers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous set of demands: European defense priorities emphasize modernization, multinational procurement cooperation, and retrofit pathways that integrate digital avionics and defensive aids; Middle Eastern customers often require enhanced range, environmental hardening, and proven lethality for expeditionary operations; and select African operators prioritize affordability, ruggedness, and simplified sustainment. Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapidly increasing investment in maritime and territorial defense capabilities, where island and littoral geographies elevate the importance of ship-capable rotary-wing solutions, longer-range munitions, and integrated ISR payloads. Across regions, interoperability, local industrial participation, and export controls remain critical variables influencing procurement strategies.
Insightful review of how original equipment manufacturers, subsystem suppliers, and aftermarket providers are aligning around integration, services, and digital resilience to capture long-term value
Corporate strategies across the rotorcraft ecosystem are increasingly oriented around systems integration, aftermarket services, and digital capability roadmaps rather than pure airframe sales. Original equipment manufacturers continue to evolve toward integrated solutions that bundle avionics, mission systems, and sustainment services, enabling longer-term revenue streams and closer operational partnerships with end users. Suppliers of engines, rotor systems, sensors, and defensive aids are investing in modular product families and qualification packages that reduce integration risk and accelerate adoption by diverse fleets.
Alliances, joint ventures, and co-development programs are becoming more prevalent as firms seek to share development risk and access regional markets through local partnerships. Aftermarket and MRO providers are expanding capabilities to include predictive maintenance analytics, digital twin services, and rapid component repair using additive manufacturing. Cybersecurity and resilience of software-defined systems are also rising to prominence, prompting companies to build hardened architectures and secure update pathways to maintain platform integrity throughout the lifecycle.
Actionable strategic priorities for executives that align supply chain hardening, digital engineering, modular architectures, and service expansion to secure competitive advantage
Industry leaders should prioritize supply chain resilience through supplier diversification and strategic stockpiling of critical components while accelerating investments in digital engineering to enable faster configuration changes. By adopting modular open systems architectures and common data standards, companies can shorten upgrade cycles and make incremental capability insertions cost-effective and politically palatable. Concurrently, firms should expand service offerings-spanning training, mission planning, and predictive maintenance-to create recurring revenue streams and deepen relationships with operators.
Engagement with coalition partners and regional suppliers will lower program risk associated with trade disruptions and expedite certification pathways for exported derivatives. Investing in secure, software-driven avionics ecosystems and clear cyber governance for fielded platforms will protect operational readiness and enable safer remote updates. Finally, commercial teams should align product roadmaps with evolving doctrinal needs-such as distributed lethality and manned-unmanned teaming-ensuring that R&D prioritizes interoperable mission systems and scalable payload options that meet both current and emergent requirements.
A transparent explanation of research methods that details primary interviews, documentary analysis, case studies, and triangulation techniques used to ensure rigor and relevance
This research synthesizes primary and secondary evidence sources, combining structured interviews with senior program managers, systems engineers, and procurement officials with open-source defense documentation and platform-specific technical literature. Data collection emphasized triangulation: insights obtained from direct conversations and supplier disclosures were cross-validated against procurement notices, certification records, and observed fleet modernization activities. Where possible, case study analyses of recent platform upgrade programs were used to identify common risk drivers, timeline impacts, and cost-objective trade-offs.
Analytical rigor was maintained through scenario testing and sensitivity analysis that explored how disruptions-such as supply chain constraints or policy shifts-propagate through procurement and sustainment chains. Limitations are clearly identified and accounted for: proprietary contract terms and classified performance data were excluded from the evidence base, and assumptions regarding program timelines were constrained to publicly verifiable milestones. Quality control measures included peer review by domain experts and iterative validation with subject-matter advisors to ensure the analysis remains robust and operationally relevant.
A decisive synthesis that highlights the necessity of modular design, supply chain agility, and strategic partnerships to sustain attack helicopter relevance and readiness
Attack helicopter capability development is at an inflection point where technological advances, doctrinal change, and industrial policy interact to shape procurement and sustainment imperatives. Platforms that prioritize modularity, software-defined avionics, and interoperability with unmanned systems will be best positioned to meet evolving operational demands. Supply chain resilience and aftermarket services will increasingly determine fleet availability and total lifecycle performance, elevating the strategic importance of integrated sustainment offerings and localized industrial partnerships.
Decision-makers should view recent trade and policy shifts as accelerants for deeper industrial cooperation rather than mere constraints. By aligning capability roadmaps with resilient sourcing strategies and by investing in digital engineering and secure software architectures, organizations can navigate near-term disruptions while building adaptive fleets capable of responding to complex, multi-domain threats. The cumulative lesson is clear: technical excellence, industrial agility, and strategic partnerships will define competitive advantage in the next phase of rotary-wing operations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
190 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities for autonomous target acquisition and engagement by attack helicopters
- 5.2. Growing demand for modular multi-role attack helicopter designs capable of rapid mission reconfiguration in theater
- 5.3. Rising investment in low-observable airframe coatings and signature reduction technologies for next-generation attack helicopters
- 5.4. Increasing emphasis on network-centric warfare integration and secure datalinks for real-time battlefield connectivity
- 5.5. Shift towards optionally piloted and unmanned autonomous attack helicopter variants to enhance operational flexibility
- 5.6. Advancements in high-altitude, high-temperature engine performance optimization for rotorcraft deployment in diverse environments
- 5.7. Adoption of active protection systems and integration of loitering munitions aboard modern attack helicopter platforms
- 5.8. Strategic partnerships and co-development agreements between OEMs and defense ministries to accelerate helicopter modernization
- 5.9. Expansion of comprehensive MRO and life-cycle support services to improve availability and reduce operational downtime
- 5.10. Regulatory scrutiny and evolving export controls impacting international sales and cross-border transfer of attack helicopters
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Attack Helicopters Market, by Platform Type
- 8.1. Dedicated Attack Helicopter
- 8.1.1. Light Dedicated Attack Helicopter
- 8.1.2. Medium Dedicated Attack Helicopter
- 8.1.3. Heavy Dedicated Attack Helicopter
- 8.2. Multi-Role Combat Helicopter
- 8.2.1. Attack-Focused Multi-Role Helicopter
- 8.2.2. Utility-Focused Multi-Role Helicopter
- 8.3. Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter
- 8.3.1. Scout Attack Helicopter
- 8.3.2. Observation and Target Designation Helicopter
- 8.4. Utility-Derived Attack Variant
- 8.4.1. Door-Gunship Configuration
- 8.4.2. Stub-Wing Equipped Attack Variant
- 8.5. Unmanned Combat Rotorcraft
- 8.5.1. Rotary-Wing Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle
- 8.5.2. Loitering Attack Rotorcraft
- 9. Attack Helicopters Market, by Weight Class
- 9.1. Light Attack Helicopter
- 9.2. Medium Attack Helicopter
- 9.3. Heavy Attack Helicopter
- 10. Attack Helicopters Market, by Mission Role
- 10.1. Close Air Support
- 10.1.1. Conventional Warfare Close Air Support
- 10.1.2. Urban Operations Close Air Support
- 10.2. Anti-Armor Operations
- 10.2.1. Tank Destroyer Role
- 10.2.2. Anti-Armored Vehicle Role
- 10.3. Armed Reconnaissance
- 10.3.1. Deep Reconnaissance
- 10.3.2. Route and Convoy Security
- 10.4. Escort and Protection
- 10.4.1. Air Assault Escort
- 10.4.2. Convoy and Ground Force Escort
- 10.5. Maritime Strike
- 10.5.1. Littoral and Coastal Defense
- 10.5.2. Anti-Surface Warfare Support
- 10.6. Counter-Insurgency
- 10.6.1. Low-Intensity Conflict Support
- 10.6.2. Counter-Terrorism Support
- 10.7. Special Operations Support
- 10.7.1. Direct Action Support
- 10.7.2. Insertion and Extraction Cover
- 11. Attack Helicopters Market, by Technology Level
- 11.1. Legacy Platform
- 11.1.1. Analog Cockpit
- 11.1.2. Limited Night Capability
- 11.2. Upgraded Legacy Platform
- 11.2.1. Glass Cockpit Retrofit
- 11.2.2. Enhanced Survivability Suite
- 11.3. Modern Platform
- 11.3.1. Network-Centric Capability
- 11.3.2. Advanced Sensor Fusion
- 11.4. Next-Generation Platform
- 11.4.1. Reduced Signature Design
- 11.4.2. High-Speed Compound Architecture
- 12. Attack Helicopters Market, by End User
- 12.1. Army
- 12.1.1. Heavy Combat Units
- 12.1.2. Light and Airborne Units
- 12.2. Air Force
- 12.2.1. Battlefield Air Interdiction Units
- 12.2.2. Combat Search and Rescue Support Units
- 12.3. Navy
- 12.3.1. Shipborne Attack Helicopter Units
- 12.3.2. Shore-Based Naval Aviation Units
- 12.4. Marine Corps
- 12.4.1. Expeditionary Units
- 12.4.2. Amphibious Assault Units
- 12.5. Special Operations Forces
- 12.5.1. Dedicated Special Operations Aviation Regiments
- 12.5.2. Theater Special Operations Aviation Attachments
- 12.6. Paramilitary and Homeland Security
- 12.6.1. Border Security Forces
- 12.6.2. Internal Security Forces
- 12.6.3. Counter-Narcotics and Customs Units
- 13. Attack Helicopters Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Attack Helicopters Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Attack Helicopters Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Airbus Helicopters SAS
- 16.3.2. Airbus SE
- 16.3.3. Aviation Industry Corporation of China
- 16.3.4. Bell Textron Inc.
- 16.3.5. Changhe Aircraft Industries Group Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.6. Denel SOC Ltd.
- 16.3.7. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited
- 16.3.8. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 16.3.9. Korea Aerospace Industries Ltd.
- 16.3.10. Leonardo S.p.A.
- 16.3.11. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 16.3.12. MD Helicopters, LLC
- 16.3.13. Russian Helicopters JSC
- 16.3.14. Textron Inc.
- 16.3.15. The Boeing Company
- 16.3.16. Turkish Aerospace Industries, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
