Artillery System Market by System Type (Anti-Aircraft Artillery, Howitzer Artillery, Mortar Artillery), Component (Ammunition, Auxiliary Equipment, Chassis & Engine), Range, Caliber, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Artillery System Market was valued at USD 11.80 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 12.60 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.64%, reaching USD 22.90 billion by 2032.
An urgent industry pivot toward precision, range, and integrated networked fire capabilities is reshaping procurement priorities and industrial strategies for artillery systems
The global artillery landscape is undergoing a period of rapid technical evolution shaped by changing threat profiles, shifting doctrines, and renewed focus on precision, mobility, and integration. Modern armed forces are reassessing how artillery contributes to deterrence, sustained fires, and expeditionary operations, leading to accelerated interest in systems that combine longer standoff ranges with increased accuracy. At the same time, advances in sensor fusion, fire control, and munitions are creating new opportunities for artillery to operate as a networked element within multi-domain campaigns.
In this context, prime contractors, subsystem suppliers, and defense planners must reconcile legacy capabilities with emergent requirements. Procurement cycles are becoming more responsive, emphasizing modularity, logistics efficiency, and commonality of components across platforms. As doctrine evolves to prioritize distributed operations and rapid counterbattery response, artillery capability requirements are leaning toward systems that can deliver precise effects at extended ranges while maintaining high operational tempo. These dynamics are compounded by supply chain pressures and geopolitical considerations that shape technology access and industrial cooperation.
Moreover, the integration of autonomous support systems and advanced battle management architectures is redefining the role of human operators and maintenance regimes. Emphasis on lifecycle affordability is driving investment in diagnostics, predictive maintenance, and digital engineering to reduce downtime and increase platform availability. Consequently, stakeholders must adopt an integrated perspective that balances capability upgrades with sustainment strategies, workforce development, and secure supply chain management
Converging technological, doctrinal, and geopolitical shifts are redirecting artillery investments toward resilient, networked, and precision-focused force constructs
The landscape that governs artillery capability and procurement is witnessing a set of transformative shifts that are simultaneously technological, doctrinal, and geopolitical. On the technological front, precision-guided munitions, advances in propellant chemistry, and onboard fire control enhancements are extending effective engagement envelopes and reducing collateral effects. These capabilities are increasingly paired with digital command-and-control systems that enable quicker sensor-to-shooter timelines and more distributed lethality. As a result, artillery is transitioning from massed area fires to agile, precision-focused engagement concepts that support joint operations.
Doctrinal changes are reinforcing these technical trends. Military planners are placing higher value on mobility, survivability, and the ability to operate dispersed formations in contested environments. Consequently, systems that offer rapid emplacement and displacement cycles, while maintaining sustained rates of fire, are prioritized. In addition, integration with intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets has become a gating factor for operational effectiveness, creating demand for seamless data interoperability across platforms and services.
Geopolitical shifts are driving procurement diversification and accelerated modernization programs in many regions. Export controls, strategic partnerships, and localized industrial policy are influencing which technologies are accessible and where production takes place. These interactions between capability, doctrine, and geopolitics are producing a dynamic procurement environment in which cross-domain integration and supply chain resilience are as important as raw performance metrics. Together, these trends are reshaping how militaries conceive of and acquire artillery capabilities for the next decade
U.S. tariff actions in 2025 accelerated strategic sourcing shifts and supply chain resilience measures across artillery component and system supply chains
The introduction and adjustment of tariffs by the United States in 2025 have had discernible ripple effects across defense supply chains, procurement planning, and industrial cooperation. Tariff measures altered cost structures for imported components and subsystems, prompting prime contractors and subsystem manufacturers to reassess sourcing strategies and supplier portfolios. In turn, some defense firms accelerated localization efforts, while others pursued alternative suppliers in allied nations to maintain program schedules and to preserve access to critical technologies.
These trade measures have also influenced program management decisions by increasing attention to total lifecycle costs and supply chain traceability. Program offices began to weigh the strategic benefits of domestic industrial capacity against the economic advantages of international collaboration. As a result, there has been a notable uptick in partnership discussions, co-production agreements, and offset arrangements designed to mitigate tariff-driven cost exposure. Procurement authorities are leveraging these mechanisms to sustain capability delivery while managing budgetary constraints.
Moreover, the tariffs have underscored the importance of supply chain risk management and strategic inventory practices. Stakeholders have invested in more rigorous component-level tracking, qualification of second-source suppliers, and the development of contingency stock for mission-critical items. While tariffs create near-term cost and scheduling challenges, they also catalyze structural shifts toward diversified sourcing, strengthened domestic industrial bases, and renewed emphasis on interoperability among coalition partners. These adaptations have implications for program timelines, supplier relationships, and long-term industrial strategy
A multi-dimensional segmentation framework maps capability demands across system types, component roles, engagement ranges, and caliber trade-offs to inform procurement and R&D focus
Insight into segmentation reveals where capability demand and industrial focus are converging, and it offers a structured way to assess competitive and supply dynamics across system types, components, ranges, and calibers. By system type, demand patterns distinguish anti-aircraft artillery, howitzer artillery, mortar artillery, and rocket artillery, each presenting distinct operational roles from point defense to deep fires. This distinction drives divergent investment pathways, with some programs prioritizing mobility and rapid response, while others emphasize sustained engagement and logistics support.
When analyzed by component, it becomes clear that ammunition, auxiliary equipment, chassis & engine, fire control systems, and gun turrets form the backbone of capability delivery. Component-level trends show increasing emphasis on precision munitions and advanced fire control integration, while chassis and powertrain developments reflect the need for agility and cross-theatre deployability. Auxiliary equipment and turrets continue to be focal points for modular upgrades that extend platform relevance without wholesale replacement.
Range segmentation, spanning long range greater than 60 kilometers, medium range between 31 and 60 kilometers, and short range less than 30 kilometers, shapes doctrinal choices and procurement timelines as forces balance standoff effects against accuracy and logistical reach. Caliber segmentation, with large caliber over 155mm, medium caliber 105mm to 155mm, and small caliber from 20mm to 105mm, further refines trade-offs between lethality, mobility, and ammunition logistics. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide a coherent framework for prioritizing investment, assessing supplier capabilities, and aligning acquisition strategy with operational requirements
Regional strategic priorities and industrial ecosystems are dictating varied procurement pathways and capability emphasis across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific theaters
Regional dynamics play a decisive role in shaping technology adoption, procurement approaches, and industrial collaboration across the artillery domain. In the Americas, priorities center on integrating advanced fire control and precision munitions with legacy platforms while ensuring rapid mobilization and sustainment across large geographic areas. This emphasis is supported by strong defense industrial bases and collaborative ties among allied programs, which facilitate technology transfer and co-development when political alignment permits.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, procurement drivers are multifaceted and reflect diverse threat environments and fiscal constraints. NATO and EU partners maintain a focus on interoperability, rapid reinforcement, and shared logistics, prompting investments in systems that can operate within coalition frameworks. Meanwhile, regional states prioritize adaptable systems that deliver credible deterrence and are amenable to localized sustainment and upgrades. Supply chain resilience and export pathways remain key considerations across this region.
Across Asia-Pacific, modernization trajectories emphasize extended-range fires, network-enabled targeting, and high-tempo operations in littoral and archipelagic environments. Rapid procurement cycles and significant investment in domestic capabilities characterize many regional programs, while strategic competition motivates both indigenous development and targeted acquisitions from international partners. In all regions, geopolitical context, industrial policy, and alliance structures shape not only what systems are procured but how sustainment, training, and doctrine are structured to support enduring operational readiness
Firms that couple integrated systems engineering, modular architectures, and resilient supply chain strategies are winning strategic partnerships and sustainment mandates
Leading companies in the artillery ecosystem are navigating a landscape that rewards technological differentiation, supply chain robustness, and collaborative engagement models. Across prime contractors and specialist suppliers, competitive advantage is increasingly tied to the ability to deliver integrated solutions that combine lethal effect with digital connectivity, sustainment affordability, and export adaptability. Firms that offer modular architectures and open-system interfaces are better positioned to capture upgrade programs and multinational collaborations.
At the component level, firms that can demonstrate precision munitions expertise, resilient chassis and propulsion systems, and advanced fire control algorithms are capturing strategic partnerships and aftermarket services. Investment in digital engineering, simulation, and testbeds is allowing suppliers to shorten development cycles and de-risk integration challenges for complex subsystems. Meanwhile, companies that develop manufacturing efficiencies and secure critical raw material supply chains are improving their value propositions to procurement authorities focused on lifecycle cost and availability.
Additionally, several companies are expanding their global footprints through joint ventures, licensed production arrangements, and targeted M&A to access new markets and to comply with local industrial participation requirements. Those that combine technical capability with proven program delivery experience are most likely to win competitive tenders and to secure follow-on sustainment contracts. Ultimately, organizational agility, cross-domain systems integration skills, and a track record of collaborative program execution are differentiators in the current competitive environment
Concrete strategic moves for primes and suppliers to enhance modularity, supply resilience, digital sustainment, and workforce readiness to secure long-term program wins
Industry leaders can take a set of clear, actionable steps to align capability portfolios with evolving operational demand and to strengthen competitive positioning. First, prioritize modular design and open-interface standards to enable future upgrades, reduce integration risk, and facilitate coalition interoperability. This creates an environment in which incremental improvements deliver outsized operational value and in which exportability is enhanced without sacrificing performance.
Second, invest in supply chain diversification and qualification of alternative suppliers for mission-critical components. This includes establishing dual-source pathways, regional manufacturing partnerships, and strategic stockpiling for high-risk items. Such measures will mitigate the impact of trade measures and geopolitical disruption while preserving program timelines. Third, accelerate the adoption of digital engineering and predictive maintenance capabilities to improve availability rates and to reduce lifecycle costs. These tools support faster iteration cycles and more accurate sustainment forecasting.
Fourth, pursue strategic collaborations that align technology holders with manufacturing capacity and with operators' training ecosystems. Co-development agreements and offset arrangements can bridge capability gaps while meeting industrial policy requirements. Fifth, emphasize workforce development and cross-disciplinary training to ensure that operators and sustainers can maximize the performance of increasingly software-defined systems. Together, these actions will help organizations convert capability concepts into fielded, sustainable effects that meet modern doctrinal demands
A triangulated research approach combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature validation, and structured open-source analysis to ensure robust, actionable insights
The research underlying these insights draws on a triangulated methodology that combines primary engagement, technical literature review, and structured open-source analysis. Primary engagement included interviews with defense planners, program managers, and industry executives to capture operational priorities, procurement drivers, and supplier performance considerations. These interactions provided real-world context for technology adoption timelines, sustainment challenges, and partnership models.
Supplementing primary inputs, technical literature and standards documentation were reviewed to verify performance characteristics, interoperability requirements, and integration pathways for key subsystems. This review informed comparative assessments of system capabilities and supported analysis of how evolving technologies like precision guidance, digital fire control, and advanced propellants influence platform design choices. Open-source reporting and policy documents were examined to contextualize geopolitical drivers, export controls, and industrial participation norms that shape procurement decisions.
Throughout the process, findings were cross-validated to ensure coherence and to identify areas of consensus and divergence among stakeholders. Attention was paid to supply chain risk indicators, program delivery milestones, and sustainment strategies to produce actionable insights. Finally, the methodology emphasized clarity and traceability, enabling readers to understand how conclusions were derived and where further investigation may be warranted for specific acquisition programs or capability domains
Balancing innovation, supply resilience, and doctrine-aligned acquisition is essential to maintain artillery relevance and operational readiness in evolving conflict environments
In summary, the artillery ecosystem is in a state of dynamic recalibration driven by technological breakthroughs, changing operational concepts, and geopolitical pressures. Precision, range, and networked connectivity are redefining what militaries expect from artillery systems, while industrial and supply chain realities are shaping how those expectations translate into acquisition and sustainment decisions. Stakeholders that balance innovation with pragmatic supply resilience will be best positioned to deliver and sustain next-generation capabilities.
The interplay between component specialization and system-level integration will continue to create opportunities for firms that can bridge those domains. As doctrine emphasizes dispersed operations and rapid counterbattery effects, systems that offer a mix of mobility, modularity, and digital interoperability will be prioritized. Concurrently, trade measures and regional industrial policies are prompting a reassessment of sourcing strategies, making partnerships and local production important pillars of long-term program success.
Ultimately, the path forward requires a holistic view that integrates capability development, supply chain management, and workforce readiness. Decision-makers should focus on creating acquisition strategies that accommodate technological evolution while preserving operational availability and affordability. By doing so, they can ensure artillery remains a decisive and adaptable element of future force structures
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An urgent industry pivot toward precision, range, and integrated networked fire capabilities is reshaping procurement priorities and industrial strategies for artillery systems
The global artillery landscape is undergoing a period of rapid technical evolution shaped by changing threat profiles, shifting doctrines, and renewed focus on precision, mobility, and integration. Modern armed forces are reassessing how artillery contributes to deterrence, sustained fires, and expeditionary operations, leading to accelerated interest in systems that combine longer standoff ranges with increased accuracy. At the same time, advances in sensor fusion, fire control, and munitions are creating new opportunities for artillery to operate as a networked element within multi-domain campaigns.
In this context, prime contractors, subsystem suppliers, and defense planners must reconcile legacy capabilities with emergent requirements. Procurement cycles are becoming more responsive, emphasizing modularity, logistics efficiency, and commonality of components across platforms. As doctrine evolves to prioritize distributed operations and rapid counterbattery response, artillery capability requirements are leaning toward systems that can deliver precise effects at extended ranges while maintaining high operational tempo. These dynamics are compounded by supply chain pressures and geopolitical considerations that shape technology access and industrial cooperation.
Moreover, the integration of autonomous support systems and advanced battle management architectures is redefining the role of human operators and maintenance regimes. Emphasis on lifecycle affordability is driving investment in diagnostics, predictive maintenance, and digital engineering to reduce downtime and increase platform availability. Consequently, stakeholders must adopt an integrated perspective that balances capability upgrades with sustainment strategies, workforce development, and secure supply chain management
Converging technological, doctrinal, and geopolitical shifts are redirecting artillery investments toward resilient, networked, and precision-focused force constructs
The landscape that governs artillery capability and procurement is witnessing a set of transformative shifts that are simultaneously technological, doctrinal, and geopolitical. On the technological front, precision-guided munitions, advances in propellant chemistry, and onboard fire control enhancements are extending effective engagement envelopes and reducing collateral effects. These capabilities are increasingly paired with digital command-and-control systems that enable quicker sensor-to-shooter timelines and more distributed lethality. As a result, artillery is transitioning from massed area fires to agile, precision-focused engagement concepts that support joint operations.
Doctrinal changes are reinforcing these technical trends. Military planners are placing higher value on mobility, survivability, and the ability to operate dispersed formations in contested environments. Consequently, systems that offer rapid emplacement and displacement cycles, while maintaining sustained rates of fire, are prioritized. In addition, integration with intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets has become a gating factor for operational effectiveness, creating demand for seamless data interoperability across platforms and services.
Geopolitical shifts are driving procurement diversification and accelerated modernization programs in many regions. Export controls, strategic partnerships, and localized industrial policy are influencing which technologies are accessible and where production takes place. These interactions between capability, doctrine, and geopolitics are producing a dynamic procurement environment in which cross-domain integration and supply chain resilience are as important as raw performance metrics. Together, these trends are reshaping how militaries conceive of and acquire artillery capabilities for the next decade
U.S. tariff actions in 2025 accelerated strategic sourcing shifts and supply chain resilience measures across artillery component and system supply chains
The introduction and adjustment of tariffs by the United States in 2025 have had discernible ripple effects across defense supply chains, procurement planning, and industrial cooperation. Tariff measures altered cost structures for imported components and subsystems, prompting prime contractors and subsystem manufacturers to reassess sourcing strategies and supplier portfolios. In turn, some defense firms accelerated localization efforts, while others pursued alternative suppliers in allied nations to maintain program schedules and to preserve access to critical technologies.
These trade measures have also influenced program management decisions by increasing attention to total lifecycle costs and supply chain traceability. Program offices began to weigh the strategic benefits of domestic industrial capacity against the economic advantages of international collaboration. As a result, there has been a notable uptick in partnership discussions, co-production agreements, and offset arrangements designed to mitigate tariff-driven cost exposure. Procurement authorities are leveraging these mechanisms to sustain capability delivery while managing budgetary constraints.
Moreover, the tariffs have underscored the importance of supply chain risk management and strategic inventory practices. Stakeholders have invested in more rigorous component-level tracking, qualification of second-source suppliers, and the development of contingency stock for mission-critical items. While tariffs create near-term cost and scheduling challenges, they also catalyze structural shifts toward diversified sourcing, strengthened domestic industrial bases, and renewed emphasis on interoperability among coalition partners. These adaptations have implications for program timelines, supplier relationships, and long-term industrial strategy
A multi-dimensional segmentation framework maps capability demands across system types, component roles, engagement ranges, and caliber trade-offs to inform procurement and R&D focus
Insight into segmentation reveals where capability demand and industrial focus are converging, and it offers a structured way to assess competitive and supply dynamics across system types, components, ranges, and calibers. By system type, demand patterns distinguish anti-aircraft artillery, howitzer artillery, mortar artillery, and rocket artillery, each presenting distinct operational roles from point defense to deep fires. This distinction drives divergent investment pathways, with some programs prioritizing mobility and rapid response, while others emphasize sustained engagement and logistics support.
When analyzed by component, it becomes clear that ammunition, auxiliary equipment, chassis & engine, fire control systems, and gun turrets form the backbone of capability delivery. Component-level trends show increasing emphasis on precision munitions and advanced fire control integration, while chassis and powertrain developments reflect the need for agility and cross-theatre deployability. Auxiliary equipment and turrets continue to be focal points for modular upgrades that extend platform relevance without wholesale replacement.
Range segmentation, spanning long range greater than 60 kilometers, medium range between 31 and 60 kilometers, and short range less than 30 kilometers, shapes doctrinal choices and procurement timelines as forces balance standoff effects against accuracy and logistical reach. Caliber segmentation, with large caliber over 155mm, medium caliber 105mm to 155mm, and small caliber from 20mm to 105mm, further refines trade-offs between lethality, mobility, and ammunition logistics. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide a coherent framework for prioritizing investment, assessing supplier capabilities, and aligning acquisition strategy with operational requirements
Regional strategic priorities and industrial ecosystems are dictating varied procurement pathways and capability emphasis across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific theaters
Regional dynamics play a decisive role in shaping technology adoption, procurement approaches, and industrial collaboration across the artillery domain. In the Americas, priorities center on integrating advanced fire control and precision munitions with legacy platforms while ensuring rapid mobilization and sustainment across large geographic areas. This emphasis is supported by strong defense industrial bases and collaborative ties among allied programs, which facilitate technology transfer and co-development when political alignment permits.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, procurement drivers are multifaceted and reflect diverse threat environments and fiscal constraints. NATO and EU partners maintain a focus on interoperability, rapid reinforcement, and shared logistics, prompting investments in systems that can operate within coalition frameworks. Meanwhile, regional states prioritize adaptable systems that deliver credible deterrence and are amenable to localized sustainment and upgrades. Supply chain resilience and export pathways remain key considerations across this region.
Across Asia-Pacific, modernization trajectories emphasize extended-range fires, network-enabled targeting, and high-tempo operations in littoral and archipelagic environments. Rapid procurement cycles and significant investment in domestic capabilities characterize many regional programs, while strategic competition motivates both indigenous development and targeted acquisitions from international partners. In all regions, geopolitical context, industrial policy, and alliance structures shape not only what systems are procured but how sustainment, training, and doctrine are structured to support enduring operational readiness
Firms that couple integrated systems engineering, modular architectures, and resilient supply chain strategies are winning strategic partnerships and sustainment mandates
Leading companies in the artillery ecosystem are navigating a landscape that rewards technological differentiation, supply chain robustness, and collaborative engagement models. Across prime contractors and specialist suppliers, competitive advantage is increasingly tied to the ability to deliver integrated solutions that combine lethal effect with digital connectivity, sustainment affordability, and export adaptability. Firms that offer modular architectures and open-system interfaces are better positioned to capture upgrade programs and multinational collaborations.
At the component level, firms that can demonstrate precision munitions expertise, resilient chassis and propulsion systems, and advanced fire control algorithms are capturing strategic partnerships and aftermarket services. Investment in digital engineering, simulation, and testbeds is allowing suppliers to shorten development cycles and de-risk integration challenges for complex subsystems. Meanwhile, companies that develop manufacturing efficiencies and secure critical raw material supply chains are improving their value propositions to procurement authorities focused on lifecycle cost and availability.
Additionally, several companies are expanding their global footprints through joint ventures, licensed production arrangements, and targeted M&A to access new markets and to comply with local industrial participation requirements. Those that combine technical capability with proven program delivery experience are most likely to win competitive tenders and to secure follow-on sustainment contracts. Ultimately, organizational agility, cross-domain systems integration skills, and a track record of collaborative program execution are differentiators in the current competitive environment
Concrete strategic moves for primes and suppliers to enhance modularity, supply resilience, digital sustainment, and workforce readiness to secure long-term program wins
Industry leaders can take a set of clear, actionable steps to align capability portfolios with evolving operational demand and to strengthen competitive positioning. First, prioritize modular design and open-interface standards to enable future upgrades, reduce integration risk, and facilitate coalition interoperability. This creates an environment in which incremental improvements deliver outsized operational value and in which exportability is enhanced without sacrificing performance.
Second, invest in supply chain diversification and qualification of alternative suppliers for mission-critical components. This includes establishing dual-source pathways, regional manufacturing partnerships, and strategic stockpiling for high-risk items. Such measures will mitigate the impact of trade measures and geopolitical disruption while preserving program timelines. Third, accelerate the adoption of digital engineering and predictive maintenance capabilities to improve availability rates and to reduce lifecycle costs. These tools support faster iteration cycles and more accurate sustainment forecasting.
Fourth, pursue strategic collaborations that align technology holders with manufacturing capacity and with operators' training ecosystems. Co-development agreements and offset arrangements can bridge capability gaps while meeting industrial policy requirements. Fifth, emphasize workforce development and cross-disciplinary training to ensure that operators and sustainers can maximize the performance of increasingly software-defined systems. Together, these actions will help organizations convert capability concepts into fielded, sustainable effects that meet modern doctrinal demands
A triangulated research approach combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature validation, and structured open-source analysis to ensure robust, actionable insights
The research underlying these insights draws on a triangulated methodology that combines primary engagement, technical literature review, and structured open-source analysis. Primary engagement included interviews with defense planners, program managers, and industry executives to capture operational priorities, procurement drivers, and supplier performance considerations. These interactions provided real-world context for technology adoption timelines, sustainment challenges, and partnership models.
Supplementing primary inputs, technical literature and standards documentation were reviewed to verify performance characteristics, interoperability requirements, and integration pathways for key subsystems. This review informed comparative assessments of system capabilities and supported analysis of how evolving technologies like precision guidance, digital fire control, and advanced propellants influence platform design choices. Open-source reporting and policy documents were examined to contextualize geopolitical drivers, export controls, and industrial participation norms that shape procurement decisions.
Throughout the process, findings were cross-validated to ensure coherence and to identify areas of consensus and divergence among stakeholders. Attention was paid to supply chain risk indicators, program delivery milestones, and sustainment strategies to produce actionable insights. Finally, the methodology emphasized clarity and traceability, enabling readers to understand how conclusions were derived and where further investigation may be warranted for specific acquisition programs or capability domains
Balancing innovation, supply resilience, and doctrine-aligned acquisition is essential to maintain artillery relevance and operational readiness in evolving conflict environments
In summary, the artillery ecosystem is in a state of dynamic recalibration driven by technological breakthroughs, changing operational concepts, and geopolitical pressures. Precision, range, and networked connectivity are redefining what militaries expect from artillery systems, while industrial and supply chain realities are shaping how those expectations translate into acquisition and sustainment decisions. Stakeholders that balance innovation with pragmatic supply resilience will be best positioned to deliver and sustain next-generation capabilities.
The interplay between component specialization and system-level integration will continue to create opportunities for firms that can bridge those domains. As doctrine emphasizes dispersed operations and rapid counterbattery effects, systems that offer a mix of mobility, modularity, and digital interoperability will be prioritized. Concurrently, trade measures and regional industrial policies are prompting a reassessment of sourcing strategies, making partnerships and local production important pillars of long-term program success.
Ultimately, the path forward requires a holistic view that integrates capability development, supply chain management, and workforce readiness. Decision-makers should focus on creating acquisition strategies that accommodate technological evolution while preserving operational availability and affordability. By doing so, they can ensure artillery remains a decisive and adaptable element of future force structures
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning for predictive maintenance and enhanced operational readiness in artillery units
- 5.2. Adoption of precision-guided munitions and GPS-based navigation systems to increase strike accuracy and reduce collateral damage in artillery
- 5.3. Development of autonomous unmanned artillery platforms with remote control capabilities to minimize crew exposure and risk
- 5.4. Implementation of network-centric warfare frameworks linking artillery units to real-time battlefield intelligence for accelerated decision-making
- 5.5. Emergence of lightweight composite materials and modular designs to enhance strategic mobility of towed and self-propelled artillery systems
- 5.6. Increased investment in counter-battery radar and electronic warfare systems to detect and neutralize enemy artillery threats proactively
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Artillery System Market, by System Type
- 8.1. Anti-Aircraft Artillery
- 8.2. Howitzer Artillery
- 8.3. Mortar Artillery
- 8.4. Rocket Artillery
- 9. Artillery System Market, by Component
- 9.1. Ammunition
- 9.2. Auxiliary Equipment
- 9.3. Chassis & Engine
- 9.4. Fire Control Systems
- 9.5. Gun Turret
- 10. Artillery System Market, by Range
- 10.1. Long Range (>60 Kilometer)
- 10.2. Medium Range (31-60 Kilometer)
- 10.3. Short Range (Less Than 30 Kilometer)
- 11. Artillery System Market, by Caliber
- 11.1. Large Caliber (>155mm)
- 11.2. Medium Caliber (105mm-155mm)
- 11.3. Small Caliber (20mm-105mm)
- 12. Artillery System Market, by End User
- 12.1. Defense
- 12.2. Homeland Security
- 13. Artillery System Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Artillery System Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Artillery System Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. BAE Systems PLC
- 16.3.2. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 16.3.3. Bharat Forge Limited
- 16.3.4. China North Industries Corporation
- 16.3.5. Denel SOC Ltd.
- 16.3.6. Elbit Systems Ltd.
- 16.3.7. General Dynamics Corporation
- 16.3.8. Hanwha Corporation
- 16.3.9. KNDS Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG
- 16.3.10. Larsen & Toubro Limited
- 16.3.11. Leonardo S.p.A.
- 16.3.12. Rheinmetall AG
- 16.3.13. Rostec
- 16.3.14. RTX Corporation
- 16.3.15. RUAG MRO Holding Ltd.
- 16.3.16. Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
- 16.3.17. Tata Advanced Systems Limited
- 16.3.18. Thales Group
- 16.3.19. The Japan Steel Works, LTD.
- 16.3.20. Yugoimport SDPR J.P.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
