Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Technology Type (Bim, Computer Vision, Internet Of Things), Deployment Mode, Project Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market was valued at USD 2.92 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 3.47 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 19.84%, reaching USD 12.45 billion by 2032.
A strategic introduction to how artificial intelligence is converting construction processes, aligning stakeholders, and redefining operational governance for project delivery
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the construction industry by converting previously manual processes into data-driven workflows and creating a new layer of intelligence across planning, operations, and asset management. Leading practitioners are no longer evaluating AI as an experimental capability but integrating it into everyday project lifecycle activities, which in turn is altering roles, risk models, and expectations for delivery performance.
Critical to this shift is a clearer understanding of how AI intersects with physical assets, human workflows, and regulatory obligations. The technology stack spans hardware such as drones and sensors, cloud and on-premise platforms for model training and analytics, and specialized software that embeds domain knowledge into predictive models. As a result, stakeholders that traditionally operated in silos now must collaborate across procurement, IT, engineering, and field operations to realize benefits.
In addition, organizational readiness and governance are becoming decisive differentiators. Companies that adopt disciplined data management, cross-functional pilot programs, and incremental scaling strategies capture value faster while minimizing disruption. Conversely, firms that treat AI as a set of point solutions risk fragmentation and underperformance. Therefore, a pragmatic introduction balances ambition with an emphasis on reproducible pilots, stakeholder alignment, and clear success metrics tied to safety, quality, and productivity outcomes.
How convergence of AI, digitization, and workforce transformation is remapping construction value chains and accelerating collaborative, outcome-focused delivery models
The construction landscape is experiencing transformative shifts driven by technology convergence, workforce dynamics, and evolving client expectations. Artificial intelligence sits at the nexus of these forces, enabling automation of inspection tasks, optimization of schedules, and predictive insights that reduce unplanned downtime. These capabilities are rewiring traditional value chains and opening new delivery models that emphasize continuous feedback between field operations and planning functions.
Concurrently, industry dynamics are changing as digitization reduces information asymmetry between owners, contractors, and designers. This fosters greater collaboration but also elevates the importance of interoperable systems and standardized data models. New entrants from adjacent technology sectors are introducing modular services that pressure incumbents to accelerate product development and service differentiation. At the same time, capital project owners are demanding demonstrable returns on technology investments, shifting procurement from vendor feature lists to proof of outcomes.
Additionally, talent availability and upskilling are shifting the competitive landscape. The most adaptive organizations are those that pair AI investments with comprehensive workforce development, establishing multidisciplinary teams that combine construction domain expertise with data science skills. As a result, the industry is moving from isolated pilots toward scaled deployments integrated into governance, compliance, and commercial contracting frameworks.
Assessing how 2025 tariff shifts have influenced hardware sourcing, procurement strategies, and supplier diversification to preserve AI deployment momentum in construction
The cumulative impact of tariff changes and trade policy shifts introduced in 2025 is reshaping procurement strategies and supplier relationships across the construction technology ecosystem. Hardware components such as drones, robotics equipment, and sensors are particularly exposed to trade-cost dynamics because their supply chains span multiple geographies and rely on specialized subcomponents. These cost pressures have triggered immediate reassessments of vendor contracts, bill-of-material sourcing, and inventory strategies.
Software and services, while less directly affected by customs duties, face indirect consequences as capital allocation decisions shift. Project owners evaluating large capital expenditures now place a premium on solutions that can be implemented with lower upfront hardware intensity or that leverage hybrid deployment modes to defer physical procurement. Integration consulting, support maintenance, and training providers are responding by packaging service-first offerings that reduce the immediate need for on-site hardware purchases.
In response, construction firms are diversifying supplier bases, accelerating validation of local manufacturing partners where feasible, and adopting design approaches that aim to reduce hardware dependency. Procurement teams are also negotiating contract clauses to manage tariff pass-through and leveraging staged procurement to smooth cost impacts over project timelines. Ultimately, the tariff environment has underscored the importance of supply chain resilience and flexible deployment architectures for organizations seeking to sustain AI adoption trajectories without compromising project economics.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis revealing where components, applications, end users, technologies, deployment modes, and project types converge to drive prioritized investments
A segmentation-led perspective clarifies where investment and operational impact are concentrated across components, applications, end users, technology types, deployment modes, and project typologies. Component-wise, hardware investments cover drones, IoT devices, robotics equipment, and sensors that provide the raw inputs for intelligence; services focus on integration consulting, support maintenance, and training that enable operationalization; and software spans AI platforms, analytics suites, and BIM software that convert data into actionable decisions. Understanding the interplay among these component classes allows organizations to prioritize integration workstreams and allocate technical resources where friction has the highest return potential.
Across application domains, solutions are applied to design modeling, equipment maintenance, project management, quality control, resource management, and safety surveillance. Project management capabilities increasingly consolidate collaboration and scheduling tools to reduce delays, while quality control capabilities concentrate on defect detection and inspection tools that augment human inspectors. Safety surveillance is evolving toward predictive monitoring and video analytics to proactively mitigate risk rather than simply document incidents.
End users are equally diverse, encompassing architects and engineers with specialized subgroups such as civil and structural engineers; contractors that include general and specialty firms; infrastructure owners; and real estate developers. Technology type segmentation reveals concentrated activity in BIM-related 3D modeling and collaboration tools, computer vision applications like image recognition and object detection, and machine learning methods spanning supervised and unsupervised techniques. Deployment choices-cloud, hybrid, and on-premise-affect integration strategies, with private and public cloud options, mixed hybrid deployments, and local server models each offering different trade-offs. Finally, project type distinctions between commercial, industrial, infrastructure, and residential contexts change requirements for scalability, compliance, and uptime, with subsegments such as office, retail, manufacturing, transportation, utilities, multi-family, and single-family housing presenting unique operational constraints and acceptance criteria.
A region-specific synthesis of adoption patterns and go-to-market imperatives across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that informs expansion strategies
Regional dynamics shape both the pace of adoption and the commercial strategies required to scale AI capabilities across the built environment. In the Americas, adoption accelerates where regulatory frameworks encourage digital recordkeeping and where large institutional owners demand measurable safety and productivity gains; integration efforts concentrate on aligning contractor operations with owner-facing reporting requirements. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape, combining regulatory rigor and sustainability mandates in some markets with rapid infrastructure-driven deployment in others, which makes modular, standards-based solutions and compliance-ready platforms particularly valuable. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific demonstrates strong demand for scalable, high-throughput solutions due to dense urbanization and large volume capital projects, with intense competition among regional technology providers and systems integrators driving rapid innovation cycles.
Cross-region considerations reveal common priorities: data interoperability, cybersecurity, and workforce upskilling. However, the relative emphasis on these priorities varies by market maturity, labor cost structures, and local regulatory frameworks. Consequently, companies pursuing geographic expansion must adapt go-to-market models to account for procurement norms, localized service delivery capabilities, and differing expectations for vendor accountability. In many cases, hybrid deployment strategies and partnerships with local integrators provide the most efficient route to market.
Insights into competitive strategies showing how providers combine hardware, software, services, partnerships, and field validation to win in the construction AI landscape
Competitive dynamics center on a mix of established technology providers, specialized systems integrators, original equipment manufacturers, and agile startups. Leading players are differentiating through end-to-end solution portfolios that combine hardware, software, and operational services, while pure-play software vendors focus on interoperability, developer ecosystems, and API-driven integrations. Systems integrators and consulting firms are expanding their capabilities with domain-specific AI expertise to bridge gaps between model outputs and actionable field interventions.
Strategic activity includes targeted partnerships, verticalized product offerings for specific project types, and outcomes-based contracting where commercial terms align vendor incentives with performance improvements. Many firms are investing in modular architectures that ease deployment across varied IT environments, enabling cloud-native implementations, hybrid stacks, or fully on-premise solutions depending on customer requirements. Additionally, companies with strengths in data management and security are seeing heightened interest, as clients prioritize solutions that reduce operational risk and improve auditability.
New entrants bring innovation in computer vision, robotics, and machine learning algorithms, but sustained competitive advantage often depends on proven field performance, service delivery models, and the ability to integrate with legacy systems. Consequently, strategic partnerships, selective acquisitions that add domain expertise, and rigorous field validation are common levers organizations use to accelerate market traction and deepen customer relationships.
Actionable recommendations for leaders to pilot, govern, procure, and scale AI solutions while transforming workforce capabilities and mitigating operational risks
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic actions to convert strategic intent into measurable outcomes. First, prioritize modular pilot programs that focus on high-frequency, high-impact processes such as inspection, equipment maintenance, and schedule optimization; these projects are ideal for proving value and creating templates for replication. Second, strengthen data governance by establishing consistent taxonomies, access controls, and documentation practices to ensure that models are trained on reliable data and outputs are auditable. Third, design procurement strategies that favor flexible deployment modes and service-first commercial terms to reduce capital intensity and allow gradual scaling.
Leaders must also invest in workforce transformation by combining domain coaching, hands-on technology apprenticeships, and cross-functional teams that include safety, operations, and IT. Simultaneously, technical leaders should require open APIs and adherence to interoperability standards to minimize vendor lock-in and enable a best-of-breed approach. From a risk perspective, embed cybersecurity and model validation into procurement checklists and contract terms, and implement staged acceptance criteria that tie payments to demonstrated operational outcomes. Finally, pursue strategic partnerships with local integrators and specialist vendors to accelerate implementation while preserving internal control over roadmap and analytics priorities.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining interviews, product audits, field case studies, and scenario analysis to validate practical insights and recommendations
The research methodology blends qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary research included structured interviews with senior executives, technical leads, and project managers across owners, contractors, and technology providers to capture first-hand accounts of deployment challenges, success factors, and procurement behaviors. Vendor product audits and technology demonstrations were conducted to validate capability claims and to observe integration footprints in representative IT environments. Additionally, field case studies examined operational impacts on safety, inspection cycles, and schedule adherence across different project typologies.
Secondary research involved systematic review of industry standards, regulatory guidance, technical white papers, and peer-reviewed literature to contextualize technological capabilities and compliance requirements. Data triangulation was applied throughout, cross-checking interview insights against observable product capabilities and documented case outcomes. Analytical methods included scenario analysis to explore supply chain and tariff impacts, thematic coding of qualitative inputs to identify recurring barriers and enablers, and risk-adjusted evaluation of deployment strategies. Findings were validated through workshops with industry subject-matter experts to ensure practical applicability and to refine recommended actions.
A concise synthesis of how disciplined integration, governance, and collaborative execution determine which organizations realize durable benefits from AI in construction
The convergence of AI, interconnected sensors, and advanced analytics is accelerating a transition from episodic experimentation to programmatic adoption across construction. Organizations that pair technical investments with disciplined governance, procurement flexibility, and workforce development capture disproportionate benefits in safety, quality, and schedule reliability. Conversely, fragmented deployments and poor data hygiene create technical debt that constrains future innovation and elevates operational risk.
Looking ahead, success will hinge on pragmatic integration strategies that balance ambition with reproducibility. Companies should maintain a portfolio approach that mixes low-risk pilots with targeted, higher-return scaling initiatives. Collaboration across owners, contractors, designers, and technology vendors is essential to achieve interoperable systems and to standardize data exchange practices. By focusing on measurable outcomes, robust validation, and scalable service models, stakeholders can accelerate adoption while maintaining control of cost, compliance, and performance expectations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction to how artificial intelligence is converting construction processes, aligning stakeholders, and redefining operational governance for project delivery
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the construction industry by converting previously manual processes into data-driven workflows and creating a new layer of intelligence across planning, operations, and asset management. Leading practitioners are no longer evaluating AI as an experimental capability but integrating it into everyday project lifecycle activities, which in turn is altering roles, risk models, and expectations for delivery performance.
Critical to this shift is a clearer understanding of how AI intersects with physical assets, human workflows, and regulatory obligations. The technology stack spans hardware such as drones and sensors, cloud and on-premise platforms for model training and analytics, and specialized software that embeds domain knowledge into predictive models. As a result, stakeholders that traditionally operated in silos now must collaborate across procurement, IT, engineering, and field operations to realize benefits.
In addition, organizational readiness and governance are becoming decisive differentiators. Companies that adopt disciplined data management, cross-functional pilot programs, and incremental scaling strategies capture value faster while minimizing disruption. Conversely, firms that treat AI as a set of point solutions risk fragmentation and underperformance. Therefore, a pragmatic introduction balances ambition with an emphasis on reproducible pilots, stakeholder alignment, and clear success metrics tied to safety, quality, and productivity outcomes.
How convergence of AI, digitization, and workforce transformation is remapping construction value chains and accelerating collaborative, outcome-focused delivery models
The construction landscape is experiencing transformative shifts driven by technology convergence, workforce dynamics, and evolving client expectations. Artificial intelligence sits at the nexus of these forces, enabling automation of inspection tasks, optimization of schedules, and predictive insights that reduce unplanned downtime. These capabilities are rewiring traditional value chains and opening new delivery models that emphasize continuous feedback between field operations and planning functions.
Concurrently, industry dynamics are changing as digitization reduces information asymmetry between owners, contractors, and designers. This fosters greater collaboration but also elevates the importance of interoperable systems and standardized data models. New entrants from adjacent technology sectors are introducing modular services that pressure incumbents to accelerate product development and service differentiation. At the same time, capital project owners are demanding demonstrable returns on technology investments, shifting procurement from vendor feature lists to proof of outcomes.
Additionally, talent availability and upskilling are shifting the competitive landscape. The most adaptive organizations are those that pair AI investments with comprehensive workforce development, establishing multidisciplinary teams that combine construction domain expertise with data science skills. As a result, the industry is moving from isolated pilots toward scaled deployments integrated into governance, compliance, and commercial contracting frameworks.
Assessing how 2025 tariff shifts have influenced hardware sourcing, procurement strategies, and supplier diversification to preserve AI deployment momentum in construction
The cumulative impact of tariff changes and trade policy shifts introduced in 2025 is reshaping procurement strategies and supplier relationships across the construction technology ecosystem. Hardware components such as drones, robotics equipment, and sensors are particularly exposed to trade-cost dynamics because their supply chains span multiple geographies and rely on specialized subcomponents. These cost pressures have triggered immediate reassessments of vendor contracts, bill-of-material sourcing, and inventory strategies.
Software and services, while less directly affected by customs duties, face indirect consequences as capital allocation decisions shift. Project owners evaluating large capital expenditures now place a premium on solutions that can be implemented with lower upfront hardware intensity or that leverage hybrid deployment modes to defer physical procurement. Integration consulting, support maintenance, and training providers are responding by packaging service-first offerings that reduce the immediate need for on-site hardware purchases.
In response, construction firms are diversifying supplier bases, accelerating validation of local manufacturing partners where feasible, and adopting design approaches that aim to reduce hardware dependency. Procurement teams are also negotiating contract clauses to manage tariff pass-through and leveraging staged procurement to smooth cost impacts over project timelines. Ultimately, the tariff environment has underscored the importance of supply chain resilience and flexible deployment architectures for organizations seeking to sustain AI adoption trajectories without compromising project economics.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis revealing where components, applications, end users, technologies, deployment modes, and project types converge to drive prioritized investments
A segmentation-led perspective clarifies where investment and operational impact are concentrated across components, applications, end users, technology types, deployment modes, and project typologies. Component-wise, hardware investments cover drones, IoT devices, robotics equipment, and sensors that provide the raw inputs for intelligence; services focus on integration consulting, support maintenance, and training that enable operationalization; and software spans AI platforms, analytics suites, and BIM software that convert data into actionable decisions. Understanding the interplay among these component classes allows organizations to prioritize integration workstreams and allocate technical resources where friction has the highest return potential.
Across application domains, solutions are applied to design modeling, equipment maintenance, project management, quality control, resource management, and safety surveillance. Project management capabilities increasingly consolidate collaboration and scheduling tools to reduce delays, while quality control capabilities concentrate on defect detection and inspection tools that augment human inspectors. Safety surveillance is evolving toward predictive monitoring and video analytics to proactively mitigate risk rather than simply document incidents.
End users are equally diverse, encompassing architects and engineers with specialized subgroups such as civil and structural engineers; contractors that include general and specialty firms; infrastructure owners; and real estate developers. Technology type segmentation reveals concentrated activity in BIM-related 3D modeling and collaboration tools, computer vision applications like image recognition and object detection, and machine learning methods spanning supervised and unsupervised techniques. Deployment choices-cloud, hybrid, and on-premise-affect integration strategies, with private and public cloud options, mixed hybrid deployments, and local server models each offering different trade-offs. Finally, project type distinctions between commercial, industrial, infrastructure, and residential contexts change requirements for scalability, compliance, and uptime, with subsegments such as office, retail, manufacturing, transportation, utilities, multi-family, and single-family housing presenting unique operational constraints and acceptance criteria.
A region-specific synthesis of adoption patterns and go-to-market imperatives across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that informs expansion strategies
Regional dynamics shape both the pace of adoption and the commercial strategies required to scale AI capabilities across the built environment. In the Americas, adoption accelerates where regulatory frameworks encourage digital recordkeeping and where large institutional owners demand measurable safety and productivity gains; integration efforts concentrate on aligning contractor operations with owner-facing reporting requirements. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape, combining regulatory rigor and sustainability mandates in some markets with rapid infrastructure-driven deployment in others, which makes modular, standards-based solutions and compliance-ready platforms particularly valuable. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific demonstrates strong demand for scalable, high-throughput solutions due to dense urbanization and large volume capital projects, with intense competition among regional technology providers and systems integrators driving rapid innovation cycles.
Cross-region considerations reveal common priorities: data interoperability, cybersecurity, and workforce upskilling. However, the relative emphasis on these priorities varies by market maturity, labor cost structures, and local regulatory frameworks. Consequently, companies pursuing geographic expansion must adapt go-to-market models to account for procurement norms, localized service delivery capabilities, and differing expectations for vendor accountability. In many cases, hybrid deployment strategies and partnerships with local integrators provide the most efficient route to market.
Insights into competitive strategies showing how providers combine hardware, software, services, partnerships, and field validation to win in the construction AI landscape
Competitive dynamics center on a mix of established technology providers, specialized systems integrators, original equipment manufacturers, and agile startups. Leading players are differentiating through end-to-end solution portfolios that combine hardware, software, and operational services, while pure-play software vendors focus on interoperability, developer ecosystems, and API-driven integrations. Systems integrators and consulting firms are expanding their capabilities with domain-specific AI expertise to bridge gaps between model outputs and actionable field interventions.
Strategic activity includes targeted partnerships, verticalized product offerings for specific project types, and outcomes-based contracting where commercial terms align vendor incentives with performance improvements. Many firms are investing in modular architectures that ease deployment across varied IT environments, enabling cloud-native implementations, hybrid stacks, or fully on-premise solutions depending on customer requirements. Additionally, companies with strengths in data management and security are seeing heightened interest, as clients prioritize solutions that reduce operational risk and improve auditability.
New entrants bring innovation in computer vision, robotics, and machine learning algorithms, but sustained competitive advantage often depends on proven field performance, service delivery models, and the ability to integrate with legacy systems. Consequently, strategic partnerships, selective acquisitions that add domain expertise, and rigorous field validation are common levers organizations use to accelerate market traction and deepen customer relationships.
Actionable recommendations for leaders to pilot, govern, procure, and scale AI solutions while transforming workforce capabilities and mitigating operational risks
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic actions to convert strategic intent into measurable outcomes. First, prioritize modular pilot programs that focus on high-frequency, high-impact processes such as inspection, equipment maintenance, and schedule optimization; these projects are ideal for proving value and creating templates for replication. Second, strengthen data governance by establishing consistent taxonomies, access controls, and documentation practices to ensure that models are trained on reliable data and outputs are auditable. Third, design procurement strategies that favor flexible deployment modes and service-first commercial terms to reduce capital intensity and allow gradual scaling.
Leaders must also invest in workforce transformation by combining domain coaching, hands-on technology apprenticeships, and cross-functional teams that include safety, operations, and IT. Simultaneously, technical leaders should require open APIs and adherence to interoperability standards to minimize vendor lock-in and enable a best-of-breed approach. From a risk perspective, embed cybersecurity and model validation into procurement checklists and contract terms, and implement staged acceptance criteria that tie payments to demonstrated operational outcomes. Finally, pursue strategic partnerships with local integrators and specialist vendors to accelerate implementation while preserving internal control over roadmap and analytics priorities.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining interviews, product audits, field case studies, and scenario analysis to validate practical insights and recommendations
The research methodology blends qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary research included structured interviews with senior executives, technical leads, and project managers across owners, contractors, and technology providers to capture first-hand accounts of deployment challenges, success factors, and procurement behaviors. Vendor product audits and technology demonstrations were conducted to validate capability claims and to observe integration footprints in representative IT environments. Additionally, field case studies examined operational impacts on safety, inspection cycles, and schedule adherence across different project typologies.
Secondary research involved systematic review of industry standards, regulatory guidance, technical white papers, and peer-reviewed literature to contextualize technological capabilities and compliance requirements. Data triangulation was applied throughout, cross-checking interview insights against observable product capabilities and documented case outcomes. Analytical methods included scenario analysis to explore supply chain and tariff impacts, thematic coding of qualitative inputs to identify recurring barriers and enablers, and risk-adjusted evaluation of deployment strategies. Findings were validated through workshops with industry subject-matter experts to ensure practical applicability and to refine recommended actions.
A concise synthesis of how disciplined integration, governance, and collaborative execution determine which organizations realize durable benefits from AI in construction
The convergence of AI, interconnected sensors, and advanced analytics is accelerating a transition from episodic experimentation to programmatic adoption across construction. Organizations that pair technical investments with disciplined governance, procurement flexibility, and workforce development capture disproportionate benefits in safety, quality, and schedule reliability. Conversely, fragmented deployments and poor data hygiene create technical debt that constrains future innovation and elevates operational risk.
Looking ahead, success will hinge on pragmatic integration strategies that balance ambition with reproducibility. Companies should maintain a portfolio approach that mixes low-risk pilots with targeted, higher-return scaling initiatives. Collaboration across owners, contractors, designers, and technology vendors is essential to achieve interoperable systems and to standardize data exchange practices. By focusing on measurable outcomes, robust validation, and scalable service models, stakeholders can accelerate adoption while maintaining control of cost, compliance, and performance expectations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. AI-driven predictive maintenance models for heavy construction equipment performance optimization
- 5.2. Generative design algorithms reducing material waste while maximizing structural integrity in projects
- 5.3. Drone and computer vision–powered site inspection platforms for real-time progress tracking
- 5.4. AI-enabled supply chain forecasting tools to mitigate material shortages and delivery delays
- 5.5. Digital twin integration with machine learning for proactive risk assessment and safety compliance
- 5.6. Autonomous robotic bricklaying systems improving efficiency in repetitive construction tasks
- 5.7. Augmented reality and AI combined solutions for real-time on-site worker guidance and error reduction
- 5.8. Machine learning–based project scheduling software optimizing resource allocation and timeline accuracy
- 5.9. AI-driven energy consumption modeling to lower carbon footprint of building operations
- 5.10. AI-powered thermal imaging analytics for proactive detection of structural defects and heat leaks
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Drones
- 8.1.2. Iot Devices
- 8.1.3. Robotics Equipment
- 8.1.4. Sensors
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Integration Consulting
- 8.2.2. Support Maintenance
- 8.2.3. Training
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. AI Software Platforms
- 8.3.2. Analytics Software
- 8.3.3. Bim Software
- 9. Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market, by Technology Type
- 9.1. Bim
- 9.1.1. 3D Modeling
- 9.1.2. Collaboration Tools
- 9.2. Computer Vision
- 9.2.1. Image Recognition
- 9.2.2. Object Detection
- 9.3. Internet Of Things
- 9.4. Machine Learning
- 9.4.1. Supervised Learning
- 9.4.2. Unsupervised Learning
- 9.5. Natural Language Processing
- 9.6. Robotics
- 10. Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market, by Deployment Mode
- 10.1. Cloud
- 10.1.1. Private Cloud
- 10.1.2. Public Cloud
- 10.2. Hybrid
- 10.3. On Premise
- 11. Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market, by Project Type
- 11.1. Commercial
- 11.1.1. Office
- 11.1.2. Retail
- 11.2. Industrial
- 11.2.1. Manufacturing
- 11.2.2. Warehouse
- 11.3. Infrastructure
- 11.3.1. Transportation
- 11.3.2. Utilities
- 11.4. Residential
- 11.4.1. Multi Family
- 11.4.2. Single Family
- 12. Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market, by Application
- 12.1. Design Modeling
- 12.2. Equipment Maintenance
- 12.3. Project Management
- 12.3.1. Collaboration Tools
- 12.3.2. Scheduling Tools
- 12.4. Quality Control
- 12.4.1. Defect Detection
- 12.4.2. Inspection Tools
- 12.5. Resource Management
- 12.6. Safety Surveillance
- 12.6.1. Predictive Monitoring
- 12.6.2. Video Analytics
- 13. Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market, by End User
- 13.1. Architects & Engineers
- 13.1.1. Civil Engineers
- 13.1.2. Structural Engineers
- 13.2. Contractors
- 13.2.1. General Contractors
- 13.2.2. Specialty Contractors
- 13.3. Infrastructure Owners
- 13.4. Real Estate Developers
- 14. Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Adobe Inc.
- 17.3.2. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
- 17.3.3. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
- 17.3.4. Autodesk, Inc.
- 17.3.5. Basler AG
- 17.3.6. Bentley Systems, Incorporated
- 17.3.7. Clarifai, Inc.
- 17.3.8. Cognex Corporation
- 17.3.9. Fujitsu Limited
- 17.3.10. Google LLC by Alphabet Inc.
- 17.3.11. Hailo Technologies Ltd.
- 17.3.12. Hexagon AB
- 17.3.13. Honeywell International Inc.
- 17.3.14. Infosys Limited
- 17.3.15. Intel Corporation
- 17.3.16. International Business Machines Corporation
- 17.3.17. Meta Platforms, Inc.
- 17.3.18. Microsoft Corporation
- 17.3.19. NetApp, Inc.
- 17.3.20. Nvidia Corporation
- 17.3.21. Oracle Corporation
- 17.3.22. Procore Technologies, Inc.
- 17.3.23. SAP SE
- 17.3.24. Trimble Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
