Artificial Intelligence Chipsets Market by Chipset Type (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Central Processing Units (CPUs), Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs)), Architecture (Analog, Digital), Deployment Type, Application - Global Fore
Description
The Artificial Intelligence Chipsets Market was valued at USD 34.28 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 46.19 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 35.84%, reaching USD 397.52 billion by 2032.
A compelling strategic introduction outlining why executives must integrate AI chipset selection with product roadmaps, operational capability, and national competitiveness
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence workloads has propelled chipsets from a technical component to a strategic asset that shapes product roadmaps, operational cost structures, and national competitiveness. Over the past decade, specialized silicon has moved from experimental accelerators to mission-critical elements embedded across enterprise applications, edge devices, and cloud infrastructures. In this context, executives must grasp not only device-level performance but also how architecture choices, supply chain design, and deployment patterns determine long-term differentiation.
As organizations deploy models with growing parameter counts and real-time constraints, chipset decisions now influence software architectures, cooling and power strategies, and data center footprints. Moreover, regulatory scrutiny, security requirements, and sustainability commitments increasingly intersect with procurement and design choices. Therefore, leaders should approach AI chipset strategy as a cross-functional imperative that aligns R&D investments, partner ecosystems, and operational capabilities.
Transitioning from concept to production requires a holistic understanding of technology maturity, integration complexity, and the commercial levers that accelerate adoption. This report provides a structured entry point for executives seeking to align technical possibilities with business objectives and to navigate trade-offs between flexibility, cost, and performance in a rapidly shifting landscape.
An incisive analysis of the technological, commercial, and supply-chain shifts that are reshaping how AI chipsets drive competitive advantage across industries
Recent shifts in the AI chipset landscape reflect a convergence of technological innovation, business model experimentation, and geopolitical realignment. On the technology front, heterogenous compute fabrics and domain-specific accelerators have proliferated, enabling dramatic improvements in inference latency and power efficiency for targeted workloads. Simultaneously, software toolchains and compiler ecosystems have matured, lowering integration friction and enabling faster time-to-deployment for custom silicon.
From a business perspective, new consumption models and partnerships are emerging as vendors and system integrators seek to lock in ecosystem value. Strategic collaborations between chip designers, foundries, cloud providers, and software vendors are redefining competitive boundaries. Additionally, increasing specialization toward vision, language, and sensor-driven applications has prompted differentiated silicon strategies that prioritize task-specific optimizations.
Moreover, supply chain resilience and onshoring initiatives have gained prominence, prompting companies to reassess sourcing, inventory, and design for manufacturability. Consequently, the industry is experiencing an inflection where design creativity, software co-optimization, and supply-chain agility collectively determine who captures long-term value. As a result, organizations that align cross-functional teams and invest in flexible architectures will be better positioned to capitalize on these transformative shifts.
A comprehensive exploration of how 2025 tariff measures have reshaped procurement, manufacturing footprints, and architectural trade-offs across the AI chipset value chain
The cumulative effects of tariff actions announced in 2025 have introduced new friction across global chipset supply chains, amplifying costs and compelling strategic reconfiguration of procurement and manufacturing footprints. Tariff measures have influenced decisions from wafer sourcing to final assembly, prompting companies to explore localization, supplier diversification, and altered inventory strategies to mitigate exposure. As a direct consequence, lead times and total landed costs have become more volatile, forcing procurement and product teams to integrate tariff risk into scenario planning.
In response, some manufacturers accelerated regional partnerships and capacity investments to reduce cross-border movements of sensitive components. Others increased vertical integration to control critical process steps that previously shifted across jurisdictions. These moves have affected the balance between fabless design firms and integrated device manufacturers, with implications for capital intensity, IP protection, and speed to market.
Importantly, tariffs have also reshaped the economics of component sourcing for specific high-value subsystems, influencing which architectural choices become viable for next-generation devices. In parallel, regulatory compliance and customs complexity have increased administrative burdens, emphasizing the need for robust trade-management practices. Consequently, companies that invest in flexible manufacturing strategies, contractual protections, and cross-border legal expertise will better navigate the layered impacts of tariff policy on chipset programs.
Actionable segmentation-driven insights revealing how chipset class, analog versus digital architecture, deployment choices, and application demands determine design and commercialization strategies
Segmentation insights reveal distinct strategic implications depending on chipset type, architecture, deployment modality, and application domain. Across chipset types such as Application-Specific Integrated Circuits, Central Processing Units, Field-Programmable Gate Arrays, Graphics Processing Units, Neural Processing Units, Tensor Processing Units, and Vision Processing Units, differentiation frequently hinges on energy efficiency, latency characteristics, and software ecosystem maturity. Strategic choices about which class of silicon to prioritize should therefore reflect workload profiles and integration complexity.
Considering architecture, the analog versus digital dichotomy continues to shape design trade-offs for power-sensitive and latency-critical use cases. Hybrid approaches that combine analog front ends with digital processing units are gaining traction for sensor fusion and edge inference scenarios. Deployment choices between Cloud and On-Premises environments dictate different connectivity, security, and lifecycle management requirements, with cloud deployments favoring scalability while on-premises solutions prioritize data sovereignty and predictable latency.
Application-driven segmentation across computer vision, deep learning, machine learning, natural language processing, predictive analytics, robotics and autonomous systems, and speech recognition highlights how workload characteristics affect chipset requirements. For instance, vision workloads typically prioritize high-throughput parallelism and specialized preprocessing, whereas NLP tasks increasingly demand memory subsystem optimizations and attention-friendly accelerators. These segmentation lenses together inform product roadmaps, partner selection, and go-to-market approaches.
A strategic regional analysis explaining how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics influence manufacturing, regulation, and adoption patterns in AI silicon
Regional dynamics are increasingly consequential as companies balance performance, cost, and geopolitical considerations. In the Americas, strong software ecosystems and large cloud providers create demand for high-performance accelerators optimized for datacenter workloads, while a healthy startup scene accelerates innovation in niche accelerators and IP cores. Moving eastward, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a fragmented landscape where regulatory frameworks, sustainability mandates, and industrial partnerships influence adoption patterns; in this region, standards compliance and energy efficiency often factor prominently into procurement decisions.
Asia-Pacific remains a center of manufacturing scale, advanced packaging innovation, and a deep supply chain for semiconductor materials and equipment, which affects lead times and collaborative development models. The region also demonstrates a diverse set of end markets, from consumer electronics to industrial automation, driving varied chipset requirements. Across regions, cross-border collaboration, trade policy, and localization strategies interact to shape where design, fabrication, and system integration activities concentrate.
Therefore, companies should craft regional strategies that reflect local regulatory ecosystems, talent availability, and partner capabilities, while maintaining global coherence in architecture and software compatibility to enable scale and resilience.
Insightful corporate strategies showing how specialization, ecosystem partnerships, IP control, and security investments distinguish market leaders and drive adoption
Leading players across the AI chipset ecosystem are pursuing differentiated strategies that emphasize specialization, ecosystem control, or platform breadth. Some firms focus intensely on developing domain-specific accelerators that optimize performance per watt for targeted applications, supporting rapid adoption by delivering turnkey software stacks and reference integrations. Others pursue broader platform strategies that span CPUs, GPUs, and accelerators, aiming to provide end-to-end solutions for cloud and on-premises deployments while leveraging economies of scale in design and validation.
Strategic partnerships between design houses, foundries, software tool vendors, and system integrators have become a central competitive axis. These alliances accelerate time-to-integration and reduce system-level risk by aligning hardware roadmaps with compiler and middleware roadmaps. Additionally, companies investing in secure boot, hardware-enforced isolation, and lifecycle update mechanisms are strengthening trust for enterprise and regulated deployments.
Intellectual property and talent acquisition remain key differentiators. Organizations that combine robust hardware IP portfolios with experienced systems, compiler, and firmware teams will move more rapidly from prototype to production. Finally, business models that include flexible licensing, managed services, or co-development agreements are proving effective in expanding addressable use cases and deepening customer relationships.
Clear, actionable strategic recommendations for executives to align architecture flexibility, regional sourcing, software integration, talent, and policy engagement for durable advantage
Industry leaders should act decisively to secure competitive advantage in a landscape defined by rapid innovation and supply-chain complexity. First, prioritize architectural flexibility by investing in modular designs and software-defined accelerators that can be re-targeted across vision, language, and sensor-driven workloads; this reduces engineering risk and extends product lifecycles. Next, pursue a dual sourcing and regional partner strategy that balances resiliency with cost efficiency, including design-for-manufacturability practices and contractual safeguards to manage tariff and trade exposure.
Furthermore, integrate software and hardware roadmaps through co-development programs with compiler and middleware vendors to reduce integration cycles and optimize end-to-end performance. Simultaneously, incorporate robust security and hardware lifecycle management capabilities to support enterprise and regulated customers. From a talent perspective, build multidisciplinary teams that combine silicon designers with systems engineers, ML researchers, and product managers to accelerate closed-loop innovation.
Finally, engage proactively with standards bodies and policymakers to shape interoperability and trade frameworks, while deploying targeted M&A or partnership plays to fill capability gaps quickly. By executing these actions in parallel, leaders can convert technical advantage into sustainable commercial outcomes.
A rigorous mixed-methods research methodology combining primary expert interviews, technical analysis, scenario planning, and IP landscaping to validate strategic insights
The research employed a mixed-methods approach to develop a robust understanding of the AI chipset ecosystem and its strategic inflections. Primary qualitative inputs included structured interviews with design engineers, procurement leaders, system integrators, and regulatory experts, complemented by workshops that validated technology readiness and integration challenges. Secondary analysis incorporated technical literature, standards documentation, and supply-chain records to triangulate observed trends and to identify emergent architectural patterns.
Analytical techniques included comparative feature mapping across chipset classes, scenario-based assessments of tariff and policy impacts, and value-chain decomposition to highlight concentration points and single-source dependencies. The study also used reverse-engineering of public design disclosures and patent landscaping to surface areas of IP concentration and novel design approaches. To ensure rigor, findings were reviewed by an independent panel of industry practitioners and subject-matter experts, and contradictory evidence was explored through sensitivity checks.
This methodology produced a layered view that blends qualitative nuance with technical specificity, enabling practitioners to assess strategic trade-offs and operational contingencies with confidence.
A concise conclusion synthesizing how design choices, ecosystem coordination, and geopolitical factors will determine long-term leadership in AI silicon
In sum, the AI chipset landscape is at an inflection point where architectural choices, ecosystem orchestration, and geopolitical dynamics will jointly determine competitive trajectories. Organizations that adopt modular design philosophies, invest in software-hardware co-optimization, and implement resilient sourcing will realize faster integration and lower operational risk. At the same time, the interplay between tariff policies, regional manufacturing capabilities, and standards frameworks will continue to reshape where value accrues in the supply chain.
Looking forward, the most successful firms will balance near-term tactical responses-such as supply-chain diversification and tariff mitigation-with longer-term strategic bets on specialized accelerators and software ecosystems. By aligning R&D priorities with clear deployment scenarios and by engaging partners across the value chain, companies can convert technological advances into sustainable market positions.
Ultimately, disciplined execution, proactive policy engagement, and continuous integration of learnings from deployed systems will separate winners from followers in the evolving era of intelligent silicon.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A compelling strategic introduction outlining why executives must integrate AI chipset selection with product roadmaps, operational capability, and national competitiveness
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence workloads has propelled chipsets from a technical component to a strategic asset that shapes product roadmaps, operational cost structures, and national competitiveness. Over the past decade, specialized silicon has moved from experimental accelerators to mission-critical elements embedded across enterprise applications, edge devices, and cloud infrastructures. In this context, executives must grasp not only device-level performance but also how architecture choices, supply chain design, and deployment patterns determine long-term differentiation.
As organizations deploy models with growing parameter counts and real-time constraints, chipset decisions now influence software architectures, cooling and power strategies, and data center footprints. Moreover, regulatory scrutiny, security requirements, and sustainability commitments increasingly intersect with procurement and design choices. Therefore, leaders should approach AI chipset strategy as a cross-functional imperative that aligns R&D investments, partner ecosystems, and operational capabilities.
Transitioning from concept to production requires a holistic understanding of technology maturity, integration complexity, and the commercial levers that accelerate adoption. This report provides a structured entry point for executives seeking to align technical possibilities with business objectives and to navigate trade-offs between flexibility, cost, and performance in a rapidly shifting landscape.
An incisive analysis of the technological, commercial, and supply-chain shifts that are reshaping how AI chipsets drive competitive advantage across industries
Recent shifts in the AI chipset landscape reflect a convergence of technological innovation, business model experimentation, and geopolitical realignment. On the technology front, heterogenous compute fabrics and domain-specific accelerators have proliferated, enabling dramatic improvements in inference latency and power efficiency for targeted workloads. Simultaneously, software toolchains and compiler ecosystems have matured, lowering integration friction and enabling faster time-to-deployment for custom silicon.
From a business perspective, new consumption models and partnerships are emerging as vendors and system integrators seek to lock in ecosystem value. Strategic collaborations between chip designers, foundries, cloud providers, and software vendors are redefining competitive boundaries. Additionally, increasing specialization toward vision, language, and sensor-driven applications has prompted differentiated silicon strategies that prioritize task-specific optimizations.
Moreover, supply chain resilience and onshoring initiatives have gained prominence, prompting companies to reassess sourcing, inventory, and design for manufacturability. Consequently, the industry is experiencing an inflection where design creativity, software co-optimization, and supply-chain agility collectively determine who captures long-term value. As a result, organizations that align cross-functional teams and invest in flexible architectures will be better positioned to capitalize on these transformative shifts.
A comprehensive exploration of how 2025 tariff measures have reshaped procurement, manufacturing footprints, and architectural trade-offs across the AI chipset value chain
The cumulative effects of tariff actions announced in 2025 have introduced new friction across global chipset supply chains, amplifying costs and compelling strategic reconfiguration of procurement and manufacturing footprints. Tariff measures have influenced decisions from wafer sourcing to final assembly, prompting companies to explore localization, supplier diversification, and altered inventory strategies to mitigate exposure. As a direct consequence, lead times and total landed costs have become more volatile, forcing procurement and product teams to integrate tariff risk into scenario planning.
In response, some manufacturers accelerated regional partnerships and capacity investments to reduce cross-border movements of sensitive components. Others increased vertical integration to control critical process steps that previously shifted across jurisdictions. These moves have affected the balance between fabless design firms and integrated device manufacturers, with implications for capital intensity, IP protection, and speed to market.
Importantly, tariffs have also reshaped the economics of component sourcing for specific high-value subsystems, influencing which architectural choices become viable for next-generation devices. In parallel, regulatory compliance and customs complexity have increased administrative burdens, emphasizing the need for robust trade-management practices. Consequently, companies that invest in flexible manufacturing strategies, contractual protections, and cross-border legal expertise will better navigate the layered impacts of tariff policy on chipset programs.
Actionable segmentation-driven insights revealing how chipset class, analog versus digital architecture, deployment choices, and application demands determine design and commercialization strategies
Segmentation insights reveal distinct strategic implications depending on chipset type, architecture, deployment modality, and application domain. Across chipset types such as Application-Specific Integrated Circuits, Central Processing Units, Field-Programmable Gate Arrays, Graphics Processing Units, Neural Processing Units, Tensor Processing Units, and Vision Processing Units, differentiation frequently hinges on energy efficiency, latency characteristics, and software ecosystem maturity. Strategic choices about which class of silicon to prioritize should therefore reflect workload profiles and integration complexity.
Considering architecture, the analog versus digital dichotomy continues to shape design trade-offs for power-sensitive and latency-critical use cases. Hybrid approaches that combine analog front ends with digital processing units are gaining traction for sensor fusion and edge inference scenarios. Deployment choices between Cloud and On-Premises environments dictate different connectivity, security, and lifecycle management requirements, with cloud deployments favoring scalability while on-premises solutions prioritize data sovereignty and predictable latency.
Application-driven segmentation across computer vision, deep learning, machine learning, natural language processing, predictive analytics, robotics and autonomous systems, and speech recognition highlights how workload characteristics affect chipset requirements. For instance, vision workloads typically prioritize high-throughput parallelism and specialized preprocessing, whereas NLP tasks increasingly demand memory subsystem optimizations and attention-friendly accelerators. These segmentation lenses together inform product roadmaps, partner selection, and go-to-market approaches.
A strategic regional analysis explaining how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics influence manufacturing, regulation, and adoption patterns in AI silicon
Regional dynamics are increasingly consequential as companies balance performance, cost, and geopolitical considerations. In the Americas, strong software ecosystems and large cloud providers create demand for high-performance accelerators optimized for datacenter workloads, while a healthy startup scene accelerates innovation in niche accelerators and IP cores. Moving eastward, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a fragmented landscape where regulatory frameworks, sustainability mandates, and industrial partnerships influence adoption patterns; in this region, standards compliance and energy efficiency often factor prominently into procurement decisions.
Asia-Pacific remains a center of manufacturing scale, advanced packaging innovation, and a deep supply chain for semiconductor materials and equipment, which affects lead times and collaborative development models. The region also demonstrates a diverse set of end markets, from consumer electronics to industrial automation, driving varied chipset requirements. Across regions, cross-border collaboration, trade policy, and localization strategies interact to shape where design, fabrication, and system integration activities concentrate.
Therefore, companies should craft regional strategies that reflect local regulatory ecosystems, talent availability, and partner capabilities, while maintaining global coherence in architecture and software compatibility to enable scale and resilience.
Insightful corporate strategies showing how specialization, ecosystem partnerships, IP control, and security investments distinguish market leaders and drive adoption
Leading players across the AI chipset ecosystem are pursuing differentiated strategies that emphasize specialization, ecosystem control, or platform breadth. Some firms focus intensely on developing domain-specific accelerators that optimize performance per watt for targeted applications, supporting rapid adoption by delivering turnkey software stacks and reference integrations. Others pursue broader platform strategies that span CPUs, GPUs, and accelerators, aiming to provide end-to-end solutions for cloud and on-premises deployments while leveraging economies of scale in design and validation.
Strategic partnerships between design houses, foundries, software tool vendors, and system integrators have become a central competitive axis. These alliances accelerate time-to-integration and reduce system-level risk by aligning hardware roadmaps with compiler and middleware roadmaps. Additionally, companies investing in secure boot, hardware-enforced isolation, and lifecycle update mechanisms are strengthening trust for enterprise and regulated deployments.
Intellectual property and talent acquisition remain key differentiators. Organizations that combine robust hardware IP portfolios with experienced systems, compiler, and firmware teams will move more rapidly from prototype to production. Finally, business models that include flexible licensing, managed services, or co-development agreements are proving effective in expanding addressable use cases and deepening customer relationships.
Clear, actionable strategic recommendations for executives to align architecture flexibility, regional sourcing, software integration, talent, and policy engagement for durable advantage
Industry leaders should act decisively to secure competitive advantage in a landscape defined by rapid innovation and supply-chain complexity. First, prioritize architectural flexibility by investing in modular designs and software-defined accelerators that can be re-targeted across vision, language, and sensor-driven workloads; this reduces engineering risk and extends product lifecycles. Next, pursue a dual sourcing and regional partner strategy that balances resiliency with cost efficiency, including design-for-manufacturability practices and contractual safeguards to manage tariff and trade exposure.
Furthermore, integrate software and hardware roadmaps through co-development programs with compiler and middleware vendors to reduce integration cycles and optimize end-to-end performance. Simultaneously, incorporate robust security and hardware lifecycle management capabilities to support enterprise and regulated customers. From a talent perspective, build multidisciplinary teams that combine silicon designers with systems engineers, ML researchers, and product managers to accelerate closed-loop innovation.
Finally, engage proactively with standards bodies and policymakers to shape interoperability and trade frameworks, while deploying targeted M&A or partnership plays to fill capability gaps quickly. By executing these actions in parallel, leaders can convert technical advantage into sustainable commercial outcomes.
A rigorous mixed-methods research methodology combining primary expert interviews, technical analysis, scenario planning, and IP landscaping to validate strategic insights
The research employed a mixed-methods approach to develop a robust understanding of the AI chipset ecosystem and its strategic inflections. Primary qualitative inputs included structured interviews with design engineers, procurement leaders, system integrators, and regulatory experts, complemented by workshops that validated technology readiness and integration challenges. Secondary analysis incorporated technical literature, standards documentation, and supply-chain records to triangulate observed trends and to identify emergent architectural patterns.
Analytical techniques included comparative feature mapping across chipset classes, scenario-based assessments of tariff and policy impacts, and value-chain decomposition to highlight concentration points and single-source dependencies. The study also used reverse-engineering of public design disclosures and patent landscaping to surface areas of IP concentration and novel design approaches. To ensure rigor, findings were reviewed by an independent panel of industry practitioners and subject-matter experts, and contradictory evidence was explored through sensitivity checks.
This methodology produced a layered view that blends qualitative nuance with technical specificity, enabling practitioners to assess strategic trade-offs and operational contingencies with confidence.
A concise conclusion synthesizing how design choices, ecosystem coordination, and geopolitical factors will determine long-term leadership in AI silicon
In sum, the AI chipset landscape is at an inflection point where architectural choices, ecosystem orchestration, and geopolitical dynamics will jointly determine competitive trajectories. Organizations that adopt modular design philosophies, invest in software-hardware co-optimization, and implement resilient sourcing will realize faster integration and lower operational risk. At the same time, the interplay between tariff policies, regional manufacturing capabilities, and standards frameworks will continue to reshape where value accrues in the supply chain.
Looking forward, the most successful firms will balance near-term tactical responses-such as supply-chain diversification and tariff mitigation-with longer-term strategic bets on specialized accelerators and software ecosystems. By aligning R&D priorities with clear deployment scenarios and by engaging partners across the value chain, companies can convert technological advances into sustainable market positions.
Ultimately, disciplined execution, proactive policy engagement, and continuous integration of learnings from deployed systems will separate winners from followers in the evolving era of intelligent silicon.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of advanced chiplet-based AI accelerator architectures to enable scalable high-performance inferencing
- 5.2. Integration of photonic interconnect layers in AI chipsets to reduce latency and power consumption at scale
- 5.3. Implementation of in-memory computing units within AI processors to accelerate matrix operations and reduce data movement
- 5.4. Deployment of domain-specific AI accelerators optimized for autonomous driving perception and sensor fusion workloads
- 5.5. Emergence of neuromorphic co-processors leveraging spiking neural networks for ultra-low power edge AI applications
- 5.6. Development of silicon carbide power delivery modules for AI data center GPUs to improve energy efficiency and thermal management
- 5.7. Standardization efforts for open AI accelerator interfaces enabling heterogeneous multi-vendor hardware ecosystems
- 5.8. Integration of embedded security enclaves in AI chip designs to protect model integrity and prevent adversarial exploits
- 5.9. Utilization of 3D stacking and through-silicon via technologies to increase AI chipset compute density and bandwidth
- 5.10. Customization of FPGA-based AI inference platforms for rapid prototyping and deployment in industrial automation systems
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Artificial Intelligence Chipsets Market, by Chipset Type
- 8.1. Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs)
- 8.2. Central Processing Units (CPUs)
- 8.3. Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs)
- 8.4. Graphics Processing Units (GPUs)
- 8.5. Neural Processing Units (NPUs)
- 8.6. Tensor Processing Units (TPUs)
- 8.7. Vision Processing Units (VPUs)
- 9. Artificial Intelligence Chipsets Market, by Architecture
- 9.1. Analog
- 9.2. Digital
- 10. Artificial Intelligence Chipsets Market, by Deployment Type
- 10.1. Cloud
- 10.2. On-Premises
- 11. Artificial Intelligence Chipsets Market, by Application
- 11.1. Computer Vision
- 11.2. Deep Learning
- 11.3. Machine Learning
- 11.4. Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- 11.5. Predictive Analytics
- 11.6. Robotics and Autonomous Systems
- 11.7. Speech Recognition
- 12. Artificial Intelligence Chipsets Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Artificial Intelligence Chipsets Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Artificial Intelligence Chipsets Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. NVIDIA Corporation
- 15.3.2. Intel Corporation
- 15.3.3. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
- 15.3.4. Qualcomm Incorporated
- 15.3.5. MediaTek Inc.
- 15.3.6. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.7. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.8. Graphcore Ltd.
- 15.3.9. Cerebras Systems, Inc.
- 15.3.10. Cambricon Technologies Corporation
- 15.3.11. Xilinx, Inc.
- 15.3.12. Micron Technology, Inc.
- 15.3.13. Texas Instruments Incorporated
- 15.3.14. Fujitsu Limited
- 15.3.15. Alibaba Group Holding Limited
- 15.3.16. Microsoft Corporation
- 15.3.17. Google LLC
- 15.3.18. Arm Limited
- 15.3.19. Cambricon Technologies Corporation Limited
- 15.3.20. Hailo Technologies Ltd.
- 15.3.21. Mythic, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
