Antifoaming Agent Market by Type (Non Silicone Based, Silicone Based), Form (Emulsion, Liquid, Powder), Application, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Antifoaming Agent Market was valued at USD 5.90 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 6.28 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.42%, reaching USD 9.71 billion by 2032.
Concise strategic overview of antifoaming agent dynamics highlighting technological innovation, regulatory pressures, and cross-industry operational dependencies driving decision-making
The antifoaming agent landscape sits at the intersection of chemistry, industrial operations, and regulatory stewardship, requiring industry stakeholders to balance formulation performance with operational efficiency and compliance. Recent shifts in manufacturing approaches, raw material sourcing, and sustainability expectations have elevated antifoaming agents from a tactical additive to a strategic input that influences product quality, process uptime, and total cost of ownership. As a result, procurement teams, R&D groups, and process engineers increasingly collaborate to align selection criteria with broader corporate sustainability and risk frameworks.
Across end-use sectors, the selection of antifoaming chemistries depends on compatibility with process streams, downstream product quality requirements, and environmental discharge regulations. This complexity has given rise to differentiated supplier propositions that emphasize formulation expertise, application support, and lifecycle impacts. Consequently, organizations that proactively integrate antifoaming strategy into capital expenditure planning and continuous improvement initiatives can unlock performance gains while reducing unplanned downtime and regulatory friction. The remainder of this summary synthesizes how technological, regulatory, and commercial forces converge to shape near‑term strategic priorities for manufacturers, suppliers, and end users.
Compelling analysis of the transformative technological, regulatory, and commercial shifts reshaping antifoaming agent selection, supply models, and application practices
The antifoaming agent landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by advancing formulation science, circularity imperatives, and evolving process automation. Innovations in silicone modifications and non-silicone chemistries have expanded performance envelopes, enabling formulators to tailor hydrophobicity, volatility, and shear stability to specific process conditions. In parallel, digital process control and inline monitoring now allow real-time foam detection and metered dosing, reducing overuse and minimizing downstream contamination risks. These technological developments accelerate iterative product improvements and raise the bar for supplier technical support and application engineering.
Regulatory and sustainability expectations are shifting procurement criteria from purely performance-centric metrics to a broader set of environmental and health indicators. Lifecycle considerations, such as biodegradability and ecotoxicity, increasingly inform supplier selection, particularly for applications with direct environmental exposure. Meanwhile, consolidation among specialty chemical suppliers and strategic partnerships between formulators and OEMs are reshaping go-to-market models. As these shifts unfold, businesses that combine advanced application testing, robust regulatory intelligence, and proactive supply chain strategies will be best positioned to capture efficiency gains and reduce operational risk.
In-depth evaluation of the cumulative operational and strategic impacts of United States tariff adjustments on antifoaming agent supply chains, sourcing, and procurement practices in 2025
Tariff policy changes enacted in recent trade cycles have introduced new frictions into the global sourcing of raw materials and finished antifoaming formulations. Increased duties, expanded tariff lines, and evolving classification guidance have altered landed cost structures for imported silicone substances, specialty oils, and polymer intermediates. As a result, procurement teams have re-evaluated supplier portfolios, accelerated qualification of local or regional suppliers, and revisited total landed cost models to incorporate customs duty risk and compliance overheads.
In response, manufacturers have diversified sourcing strategies by qualifying alternative feedstocks, increasing onshore manufacturing where feasible, and negotiating long-term supply agreements that include tariff protection clauses. Companies with in-house customs expertise and proactive tariff engineering-such as reclassification strategies and bonded warehousing-have mitigated margin disruption and secured continuity for critical inputs. At the operational level, tariffs have encouraged process teams to optimize formulations for raw material availability and to standardize application protocols across facilities to simplify qualification. Ultimately, while tariffs increase complexity, they also catalyze supply chain resilience and supplier collaboration, prompting stakeholders to align procurement, legal, and technical functions to preserve operational stability and commercial competitiveness.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis describing how type, application, form, and distribution channel interact to determine formulation selection, validation priorities, and go-to-market choices
A granular view of segmentation reveals how chemistry, application, form factor, and distribution channels jointly dictate performance expectations and commercial dynamics. Based on Type, the market is studied across Non Silicone Based and Silicone Based; the Non Silicone Based category further encompasses fatty acid based, mineral oil based, phospholipid based, and polymer based chemistries, while the Silicone Based category differentiates between linear polydimethylsiloxane and modified polydimethylsiloxane variants. These compositional distinctions influence attributes such as defoaming speed, persistence, and compatibility with organic or aqueous matrices, which in turn shape selection for specific process conditions.
Based on Application, the market is studied across food and beverage, oil and gas, paint and coatings, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper, and water treatment; within food and beverage, the study drills into biotech, brewing, dairy, sugar processing, and vegetable oil processing use cases. Application-specific regulatory constraints, product purity requirements, and sensory considerations drive formulation choices and supplier validation practices. Based on Form, the market is studied across emulsion, liquid, and powder presentations, each offering trade-offs in dosing accuracy, storage stability, and ease of incorporation. Finally, based on Distribution Channel, the market is studied across direct sales, distributors, and online channels; channel economics and technical support capabilities shape buyer-supplier relationships, with direct sales favoring complex, high-support accounts and distributors or online channels enabling broader reach and smaller-lot flexibility.
Regional insights explaining how industrial structure, regulatory environments, and feedstock access in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape adoption and supplier strategies
Regional dynamics reflect a combination of industrial structure, regulatory regimes, and feedstock availability that drives differentiated adoption patterns for antifoaming agents. In the Americas, strong industrial process sectors such as food processing and pulp and paper couple with established specialty chemical manufacturing to support both innovation and rapid deployment of application-specific solutions. North American regulatory frameworks and established supply chain infrastructure encourage supplier presence near major end users to meet quick-turn technical support needs.
Europe, Middle East & Africa represents a complex mosaic where stringent environmental regulations and sustainability expectations, particularly in many European jurisdictions, accelerate interest in non-silicone alternatives and biodegradable formulations. Regulatory scrutiny and public procurement standards often necessitate advanced product stewardship and transparent supply chains. In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrial expansion, diversified end-use sectors, and proximity to key feedstock suppliers create a dynamic environment in which local formulation innovation competes with global specialty players. Across these regions, companies adapt commercial strategies to local regulatory realities, logistics constraints, and customer expectations while leveraging regional R&D and manufacturing footprints to optimize service levels and responsiveness.
Key competitive and corporate insights revealing how formulation expertise, application support, and strategic partnerships determine leadership and differentiation across the antifoaming agent landscape
Competitive dynamics in the antifoaming agent landscape reward technical depth, application engineering, and consistent supply reliability. Leading producers differentiate through a combination of advanced formulation capabilities, localized technical support, and collaborative development programs with end users that embed antifoaming strategy into process optimization efforts. Companies that invest in dedicated application laboratories, pilot testing, and cross-functional teams can shorten qualification timelines and reduce scale-up risk for complex processes.
Smaller specialty suppliers focus on niche chemistries or industry verticals, offering rapid product customization and flexible commercial terms. Channel partners and distributors that provide formulation advisory services and local inventory management add value by reducing lead times and facilitating smaller-lot trials. Strategic partnerships-such as toll manufacturing agreements, co-development pacts with OEMs, and supplier consolidation-further influence competitive positioning. Ultimately, firms that combine robust R&D pipelines, proactive regulatory intelligence, and agile supply chain practices will sustain customer retention and drive long-term commercial differentiation.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to align technical capability with procurement discipline, supply chain resilience, and digital process optimization for antifoaming operations
Leaders should prioritize a set of actionable initiatives that translate technical capability into commercial advantage while mitigating operational risk. First, integrate antifoaming selection criteria into cross-functional capital and process improvement planning so that procurement, R&D, and production teams jointly evaluate trade-offs between performance, regulatory compliance, and total operating cost. This approach reduces cycle time for ingredient qualification and ensures decisions reflect enterprise-level priorities.
Second, invest in application laboratories and pilot trials that replicate customer process conditions to validate formulations under realistic shear, temperature, and chemical exposure profiles. Third, diversify sourcing strategies by qualifying regional suppliers and exploring alternative feedstocks to reduce tariff exposure and logistics vulnerability. Fourth, strengthen supplier contracts with technical service commitments and contingency clauses to secure critical inputs. Fifth, adopt digital dosing and inline monitoring solutions to optimize usage, reduce waste, and provide traceable dosing records for compliance. By executing these measures, organizations can enhance resilience, reduce process variability, and capture operational efficiencies that support competitive positioning.
Transparent research methodology describing the multi-source validation approach, laboratory and field evidence synthesis, and regulatory and tariff analysis techniques used to develop authoritative insights
This research synthesizes primary interviews with technical and procurement leaders, secondary literature on polymer and surfactant chemistry, and publicly available regulatory guidance to form a comprehensive evidence base. The approach prioritized triangulation across laboratory validation reports, supplier technical dossiers, and in-plant performance case studies to ensure findings reflect real-world application constraints and performance trade-offs. Qualitative insights were derived from cross-sector conversations that illuminated how end users prioritize attributes such as persistence, dosing precision, and environmental acceptability.
To maintain rigor, the methodology applied a structured framework for assessing formulation attributes against application conditions, integrating material compatibility checks, dosing practices, and downstream quality considerations. Regulatory and tariff analyses drew from official customs classifications, policy announcements, and industry commentary to interpret likely operational impacts without relying on proprietary market estimates. Throughout, the research emphasized reproducibility by documenting data sources, validation protocols, and assumptions to enable buyers to assess fit-for-purpose and to request deeper, customized analyses aligned with specific operational contexts.
Conclusive synthesis emphasizing that integrating formulation science, supply chain resilience, and operational systems determines sustained competitive advantage in antifoaming applications
The synthesis underscores that antifoaming agent strategy now extends beyond formulary choices to encompass supply chain design, regulatory preparedness, and digital process integration. Technical performance remains foundational, but it must be evaluated alongside environmental acceptability, dosing economics, and the capability of suppliers to provide on-site support and rapid troubleshooting. Companies that balance formulation innovation with practical operational controls capture benefits in product quality, uptime, and cost management while minimizing regulatory and reputational exposures.
Moving forward, multidisciplinary collaboration between formulation scientists, process engineers, procurement specialists, and compliance teams will determine which organizations convert technical advances into measurable operational improvements. Appropriate investments in pilot validation, supplier risk management, and automated dosing systems will yield more resilient and efficient operations. The conclusion therefore is not only that chemistry matters, but that organizational capability to integrate chemistry with process and commercial systems ultimately defines competitive advantage in the antifoaming domain.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Concise strategic overview of antifoaming agent dynamics highlighting technological innovation, regulatory pressures, and cross-industry operational dependencies driving decision-making
The antifoaming agent landscape sits at the intersection of chemistry, industrial operations, and regulatory stewardship, requiring industry stakeholders to balance formulation performance with operational efficiency and compliance. Recent shifts in manufacturing approaches, raw material sourcing, and sustainability expectations have elevated antifoaming agents from a tactical additive to a strategic input that influences product quality, process uptime, and total cost of ownership. As a result, procurement teams, R&D groups, and process engineers increasingly collaborate to align selection criteria with broader corporate sustainability and risk frameworks.
Across end-use sectors, the selection of antifoaming chemistries depends on compatibility with process streams, downstream product quality requirements, and environmental discharge regulations. This complexity has given rise to differentiated supplier propositions that emphasize formulation expertise, application support, and lifecycle impacts. Consequently, organizations that proactively integrate antifoaming strategy into capital expenditure planning and continuous improvement initiatives can unlock performance gains while reducing unplanned downtime and regulatory friction. The remainder of this summary synthesizes how technological, regulatory, and commercial forces converge to shape near‑term strategic priorities for manufacturers, suppliers, and end users.
Compelling analysis of the transformative technological, regulatory, and commercial shifts reshaping antifoaming agent selection, supply models, and application practices
The antifoaming agent landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by advancing formulation science, circularity imperatives, and evolving process automation. Innovations in silicone modifications and non-silicone chemistries have expanded performance envelopes, enabling formulators to tailor hydrophobicity, volatility, and shear stability to specific process conditions. In parallel, digital process control and inline monitoring now allow real-time foam detection and metered dosing, reducing overuse and minimizing downstream contamination risks. These technological developments accelerate iterative product improvements and raise the bar for supplier technical support and application engineering.
Regulatory and sustainability expectations are shifting procurement criteria from purely performance-centric metrics to a broader set of environmental and health indicators. Lifecycle considerations, such as biodegradability and ecotoxicity, increasingly inform supplier selection, particularly for applications with direct environmental exposure. Meanwhile, consolidation among specialty chemical suppliers and strategic partnerships between formulators and OEMs are reshaping go-to-market models. As these shifts unfold, businesses that combine advanced application testing, robust regulatory intelligence, and proactive supply chain strategies will be best positioned to capture efficiency gains and reduce operational risk.
In-depth evaluation of the cumulative operational and strategic impacts of United States tariff adjustments on antifoaming agent supply chains, sourcing, and procurement practices in 2025
Tariff policy changes enacted in recent trade cycles have introduced new frictions into the global sourcing of raw materials and finished antifoaming formulations. Increased duties, expanded tariff lines, and evolving classification guidance have altered landed cost structures for imported silicone substances, specialty oils, and polymer intermediates. As a result, procurement teams have re-evaluated supplier portfolios, accelerated qualification of local or regional suppliers, and revisited total landed cost models to incorporate customs duty risk and compliance overheads.
In response, manufacturers have diversified sourcing strategies by qualifying alternative feedstocks, increasing onshore manufacturing where feasible, and negotiating long-term supply agreements that include tariff protection clauses. Companies with in-house customs expertise and proactive tariff engineering-such as reclassification strategies and bonded warehousing-have mitigated margin disruption and secured continuity for critical inputs. At the operational level, tariffs have encouraged process teams to optimize formulations for raw material availability and to standardize application protocols across facilities to simplify qualification. Ultimately, while tariffs increase complexity, they also catalyze supply chain resilience and supplier collaboration, prompting stakeholders to align procurement, legal, and technical functions to preserve operational stability and commercial competitiveness.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis describing how type, application, form, and distribution channel interact to determine formulation selection, validation priorities, and go-to-market choices
A granular view of segmentation reveals how chemistry, application, form factor, and distribution channels jointly dictate performance expectations and commercial dynamics. Based on Type, the market is studied across Non Silicone Based and Silicone Based; the Non Silicone Based category further encompasses fatty acid based, mineral oil based, phospholipid based, and polymer based chemistries, while the Silicone Based category differentiates between linear polydimethylsiloxane and modified polydimethylsiloxane variants. These compositional distinctions influence attributes such as defoaming speed, persistence, and compatibility with organic or aqueous matrices, which in turn shape selection for specific process conditions.
Based on Application, the market is studied across food and beverage, oil and gas, paint and coatings, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper, and water treatment; within food and beverage, the study drills into biotech, brewing, dairy, sugar processing, and vegetable oil processing use cases. Application-specific regulatory constraints, product purity requirements, and sensory considerations drive formulation choices and supplier validation practices. Based on Form, the market is studied across emulsion, liquid, and powder presentations, each offering trade-offs in dosing accuracy, storage stability, and ease of incorporation. Finally, based on Distribution Channel, the market is studied across direct sales, distributors, and online channels; channel economics and technical support capabilities shape buyer-supplier relationships, with direct sales favoring complex, high-support accounts and distributors or online channels enabling broader reach and smaller-lot flexibility.
Regional insights explaining how industrial structure, regulatory environments, and feedstock access in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape adoption and supplier strategies
Regional dynamics reflect a combination of industrial structure, regulatory regimes, and feedstock availability that drives differentiated adoption patterns for antifoaming agents. In the Americas, strong industrial process sectors such as food processing and pulp and paper couple with established specialty chemical manufacturing to support both innovation and rapid deployment of application-specific solutions. North American regulatory frameworks and established supply chain infrastructure encourage supplier presence near major end users to meet quick-turn technical support needs.
Europe, Middle East & Africa represents a complex mosaic where stringent environmental regulations and sustainability expectations, particularly in many European jurisdictions, accelerate interest in non-silicone alternatives and biodegradable formulations. Regulatory scrutiny and public procurement standards often necessitate advanced product stewardship and transparent supply chains. In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrial expansion, diversified end-use sectors, and proximity to key feedstock suppliers create a dynamic environment in which local formulation innovation competes with global specialty players. Across these regions, companies adapt commercial strategies to local regulatory realities, logistics constraints, and customer expectations while leveraging regional R&D and manufacturing footprints to optimize service levels and responsiveness.
Key competitive and corporate insights revealing how formulation expertise, application support, and strategic partnerships determine leadership and differentiation across the antifoaming agent landscape
Competitive dynamics in the antifoaming agent landscape reward technical depth, application engineering, and consistent supply reliability. Leading producers differentiate through a combination of advanced formulation capabilities, localized technical support, and collaborative development programs with end users that embed antifoaming strategy into process optimization efforts. Companies that invest in dedicated application laboratories, pilot testing, and cross-functional teams can shorten qualification timelines and reduce scale-up risk for complex processes.
Smaller specialty suppliers focus on niche chemistries or industry verticals, offering rapid product customization and flexible commercial terms. Channel partners and distributors that provide formulation advisory services and local inventory management add value by reducing lead times and facilitating smaller-lot trials. Strategic partnerships-such as toll manufacturing agreements, co-development pacts with OEMs, and supplier consolidation-further influence competitive positioning. Ultimately, firms that combine robust R&D pipelines, proactive regulatory intelligence, and agile supply chain practices will sustain customer retention and drive long-term commercial differentiation.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to align technical capability with procurement discipline, supply chain resilience, and digital process optimization for antifoaming operations
Leaders should prioritize a set of actionable initiatives that translate technical capability into commercial advantage while mitigating operational risk. First, integrate antifoaming selection criteria into cross-functional capital and process improvement planning so that procurement, R&D, and production teams jointly evaluate trade-offs between performance, regulatory compliance, and total operating cost. This approach reduces cycle time for ingredient qualification and ensures decisions reflect enterprise-level priorities.
Second, invest in application laboratories and pilot trials that replicate customer process conditions to validate formulations under realistic shear, temperature, and chemical exposure profiles. Third, diversify sourcing strategies by qualifying regional suppliers and exploring alternative feedstocks to reduce tariff exposure and logistics vulnerability. Fourth, strengthen supplier contracts with technical service commitments and contingency clauses to secure critical inputs. Fifth, adopt digital dosing and inline monitoring solutions to optimize usage, reduce waste, and provide traceable dosing records for compliance. By executing these measures, organizations can enhance resilience, reduce process variability, and capture operational efficiencies that support competitive positioning.
Transparent research methodology describing the multi-source validation approach, laboratory and field evidence synthesis, and regulatory and tariff analysis techniques used to develop authoritative insights
This research synthesizes primary interviews with technical and procurement leaders, secondary literature on polymer and surfactant chemistry, and publicly available regulatory guidance to form a comprehensive evidence base. The approach prioritized triangulation across laboratory validation reports, supplier technical dossiers, and in-plant performance case studies to ensure findings reflect real-world application constraints and performance trade-offs. Qualitative insights were derived from cross-sector conversations that illuminated how end users prioritize attributes such as persistence, dosing precision, and environmental acceptability.
To maintain rigor, the methodology applied a structured framework for assessing formulation attributes against application conditions, integrating material compatibility checks, dosing practices, and downstream quality considerations. Regulatory and tariff analyses drew from official customs classifications, policy announcements, and industry commentary to interpret likely operational impacts without relying on proprietary market estimates. Throughout, the research emphasized reproducibility by documenting data sources, validation protocols, and assumptions to enable buyers to assess fit-for-purpose and to request deeper, customized analyses aligned with specific operational contexts.
Conclusive synthesis emphasizing that integrating formulation science, supply chain resilience, and operational systems determines sustained competitive advantage in antifoaming applications
The synthesis underscores that antifoaming agent strategy now extends beyond formulary choices to encompass supply chain design, regulatory preparedness, and digital process integration. Technical performance remains foundational, but it must be evaluated alongside environmental acceptability, dosing economics, and the capability of suppliers to provide on-site support and rapid troubleshooting. Companies that balance formulation innovation with practical operational controls capture benefits in product quality, uptime, and cost management while minimizing regulatory and reputational exposures.
Moving forward, multidisciplinary collaboration between formulation scientists, process engineers, procurement specialists, and compliance teams will determine which organizations convert technical advances into measurable operational improvements. Appropriate investments in pilot validation, supplier risk management, and automated dosing systems will yield more resilient and efficient operations. The conclusion therefore is not only that chemistry matters, but that organizational capability to integrate chemistry with process and commercial systems ultimately defines competitive advantage in the antifoaming domain.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
199 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Innovative silicone-free antifoaming formulations tailored for food and beverage industry processes
- 5.2. Growing regulatory pressure on synthetic antifoam chemicals driving research in biodegradable alternatives
- 5.3. Expansion of antifoaming agent production capacity in Asia-Pacific to meet rising industrial demands
- 5.4. Integration of real-time foam monitoring sensors with antifoam dosing systems in wastewater treatment
- 5.5. Surge in demand for antifoams in biotech fermentation driven by increased vaccine and enzyme manufacturing
- 5.6. Strategic acquisitions among specialty chemical companies bolstering antifoaming portfolios globally
- 5.7. Development of nanoemulsion-based defoamers offering enhanced thermal stability and dispersion performance
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Antifoaming Agent Market, by Type
- 8.1. Non Silicone Based
- 8.1.1. Fatty Acid Based
- 8.1.2. Mineral Oil Based
- 8.1.3. Phospholipid Based
- 8.1.4. Polymer Based
- 8.2. Silicone Based
- 8.2.1. Linear Polydimethylsiloxane
- 8.2.2. Modified Polydimethylsiloxane
- 9. Antifoaming Agent Market, by Form
- 9.1. Emulsion
- 9.2. Liquid
- 9.3. Powder
- 10. Antifoaming Agent Market, by Application
- 10.1. Food & Beverage
- 10.1.1. Biotech
- 10.1.2. Brewing
- 10.1.3. Dairy
- 10.1.4. Sugar Processing
- 10.1.5. Vegetable Oil Processing
- 10.2. Oil & Gas
- 10.3. Paint & Coatings
- 10.4. Pharmaceutical
- 10.5. Pulp & Paper
- 10.6. Water Treatment
- 11. Antifoaming Agent Market, by Distribution Channel
- 11.1. Direct Sales
- 11.2. Distributors
- 11.3. Online
- 12. Antifoaming Agent Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Antifoaming Agent Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Antifoaming Agent Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. BASF SE
- 15.3.2. Dow Chemical Company
- 15.3.3. Wacker Chemie AG
- 15.3.4. Evonik Industries AG
- 15.3.5. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.6. Momentive Performance Materials Inc.
- 15.3.7. Clariant AG
- 15.3.8. Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
- 15.3.9. Kemira Oyj
- 15.3.10. Elementis plc
- 15.3.11. BYK-Chemie GmbH
- 15.3.12. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
- 15.3.13. Huntsman Corporation
- 15.3.14. Arkema S.A.
- 15.3.15. Lanxess AG
- 15.3.16. Rudolf GmbH
- 15.3.17. Dow Corning Corporation
- 15.3.18. Bluestar Silicones International
- 15.3.19. Elkem ASA
- 15.3.20. KCC Corporation
- 15.3.21. Supreme Silicones
- 15.3.22. Siltech Corporation
- 15.3.23. LEVACO Chemicals GmbH
- 15.3.24. BRB International BV
- 15.3.25. Trans-Chemco, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
