Anti-Drone Market by Technology (Drone Countermeasure Equipment, Drone Monitoring Equipment), Range (Less Than 5 km, More Than 5 km), Platform, Application, Verticals - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Anti-Drone Market was valued at USD 2.33 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.94 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 28.73%, reaching USD 17.61 billion by 2032.
Contextualizing the Critical Emergence of Anti-Drone Technologies in Response to Rapidly Escalating Aerial Threats
In a security landscape increasingly defined by novel aerial threats, the anti-drone sector has emerged as a critical frontier for technological innovation and risk mitigation. This introduction sets the stage for understanding how remote aerial devices have evolved from niche hobbyist platforms into sophisticated tools with the potential to disrupt critical infrastructure, public events, and sensitive operations.
As counter-drone measures advance, stakeholders across commercial, homeland security, and defense sectors are compelled to reexamine their threat models, operational protocols, and investment priorities. Through this overview, we establish the foundational context for the subsequent analysis, highlighting the interplay between emerging drone capabilities and the defensive technologies designed to neutralize them.
Examining Next-Generation Multi-Sensor Detection and Directed-Energy Countermeasures Revolutionizing Anti-Drone Defense Architectures
Over the past several years, the anti-drone domain has witnessed transformative shifts driven by unprecedented advancements in sensor fusion, directed-energy solutions, and cyber takeover systems. Early iterations of counter-UAV devices relied predominantly on radar detection paired with radio frequency jamming, but today’s solutions seamlessly integrate acoustic sensors, optical cameras, and RF analysers to achieve multilayered situational awareness.
Concurrently, the rise of net-based capture systems and high-energy lasers marks a departure from purely electronic defeat mechanisms toward kinetic and quasi-kinetic strategies. This evolution not only enhances operational flexibility but also underscores a shift in vendor roadmaps from singular point solutions to fully integrated defensive architectures. As a result, organizations are now adopting platform-agnostic frameworks that enable ground-based installations to operate in concert with handheld and UAV-mounted deployable assets, ensuring comprehensive coverage across both short- and long-range scenarios.
Analyzing How 2025 United States Tariffs on Key Anti-Drone Components Are Reshaping Supply Chains and Strategic Partnerships
The imposition of new United States tariffs in early 2025 has reshaped cost structures, supply chain dynamics, and procurement timelines for anti-drone components. While domestic manufacturing incentives have surged, international suppliers confront increased duties on key subassemblies such as RF jammers, GPS spoofers, and optical sensor modules. This has compelled end users to reconfigure their sourcing strategies, balancing the appeal of lower-cost imports against the reliability and responsiveness of local production.
Moreover, heightened tariffs have accelerated collaborations between defense integrators and national laboratories to localize critical technology development. As a transitionary phase, organizations are now prioritizing in-country partnerships to mitigate exposure to fluctuating trade policies. In this context, the cumulative impact of the 2025 duties extends beyond simple price escalations, fundamentally influencing product roadmaps, joint ventures, and the broader innovation ecosystem within which anti-drone systems are conceived and deployed.
Unveiling How Multi-Dimensional Segmentation of Anti-Drone Systems Drives Feature Prioritization and Sector-Specific Integration
Segmentation by technology reveals that efforts to counter and monitor unauthorized drones now rest on two primary pillars: countermeasure and surveillance platforms. Countermeasure equipment encompasses cyber takeover systems that seize control of rogue drones, advanced GPS spoofers engineered to misdirect flight paths, high-energy lasers capable of precision engagement, nets and net guns for kinetic interception, and sophisticated radio frequency jammers designed to sever communication links. Surveillance equipment, on the other hand, integrates acoustic microphones to detect rotor signatures, high-resolution optical cameras for visual confirmation, radar for early warning across open terrain, and RF analysers that profile signal anomalies.
When viewed through the lens of operational range, solutions tailored for engagements within a five-kilometer radius are often optimized for rapid deployment scenarios, whereas systems boasting extended coverage beyond five kilometers cater to wide-area surveillance and proactive threat neutralization. Platform-based segmentation underscores the diversity of deployment modalities, spanning fixed ground-based installations, agile handheld units for short-range protection, and UAV-mounted payloads that extend defensive reach. Functionally, applications are delineated by alerting capabilities that feed real-time warnings, classification and detection algorithms that distinguish between friend and foe, and tracking solutions that maintain continuous custodial custody of an aerial object’s trajectory. Finally, vertical markets-commercial critical infrastructure and public venue protection, homeland security missions, and military and defense operations-drive feature prioritization, regulatory compliance, and integration depth according to sector-specific risk profiles.
Exploring Regional Strategic Variances and Adoption Drivers Shaping Anti-Drone Deployment Across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics in the Americas underscore a robust emphasis on homeland security and critical infrastructure resilience, with national and local agencies investing heavily in both fixed installations and mobile rapid-response kits. In contrast, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa present a tapestry of regulatory frameworks and security doctrines, prompting solution providers to adopt modular architectures that satisfy divergent compliance regimes while facilitating cross-border deployments. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific markets are characterized by accelerated urbanization and dense population centers, which amplify the demand for compact, handheld, and UAV-integrated counter-drone systems that can be swiftly redeployed in response to emerging threats.
Across each territory, partnerships between technology vendors and government agencies drive localized innovation, fueling an ecosystem where regional standards and procurement cycles shape product roadmaps. Consequently, the interplay of these geographic trends informs global go-to-market strategies, alliance formation, and R&D investments, ensuring that regional nuances are reflected in both product design and support infrastructure.
Assessing How Leading Defense Primes and Agile Tech Innovators Are Shaping the Competitive Terrain of Counter-UAV Solutions
Leading players in the anti-drone landscape have distinguished themselves through strategic investments in sensor integration, directed-energy research, and global support networks. Several defense prime contractors have leveraged their existing air defense portfolios to introduce scalable solutions that address both civil and military use cases, while specialized technology firms have disrupted the status quo through modular capture systems and AI-driven detection platforms.
These organizations have also forged alliances with academic institutions and government laboratories to accelerate proof-of-concept trials, refine lethality thresholds for non-kinetic engagements, and validate cross-platform interoperability. As market incumbents pursue consolidation through acquisitions and joint ventures, emerging challengers continue to focus on niche capabilities-such as stealth detection or rapid-deployment handheld jammers-to carve out defensible positions within the broader ecosystem.
Strategic Imperatives for Industry Stakeholders to Enhance Collaboration, Cyber Resilience, and Operational Readiness in Counter-UAV Programs
Industry leaders should prioritize the establishment of open-architecture frameworks that facilitate rapid integration of new sensor types and defeat mechanisms. By cultivating collaborative partnerships across academia, government research entities, and technology startups, organizations can accelerate innovation cycles and distribute risk. Furthermore, investment in robust cybersecurity protocols is essential to safeguard against adversarial exploitation of connected counter-drone networks.
In parallel, decision-makers must develop comprehensive training programs that bridge the gap between advanced system capabilities and tactical operator proficiency. Finally, aligning procurement strategies with evolving regulatory landscapes and tariff environments will enhance supply chain resilience and ensure that both domestic and international deployments remain agile in the face of policy shifts.
Detailing a Two-Tiered Research Framework Integrating Primary Stakeholder Interviews and Secondary Data Triangulation for Robust Insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines a rigorous two-tiered approach. Primary insights were obtained through structured interviews with defense officials, security integrators, and technology architects, supplemented by in-depth workshops that validated emerging capability roadmaps. Secondary data was gathered from a curated selection of government publications, open-source intelligence repositories, and peer-reviewed technical journals to cross-verify technology readiness levels and deployment case studies.
Data triangulation techniques were employed to reconcile differing viewpoints, while quantitative trend analysis provided directional understanding of adoption trajectories. Finally, scenario planning exercises were conducted to test the robustness of strategic recommendations under varied regulatory and geopolitical contingencies.
Synthesizing Key Findings and Strategic Implications to Guide Future Anti-Drone Ecosystem Development
In summary, the anti-drone market is transitioning from isolated point solutions toward cohesive defensive ecosystems that balance kinetic and non-kinetic modalities. Market dynamics are shaped by evolving threat vectors, shifting regulatory regimes, and the global repositioning of supply chains in response to new tariff structures. Segmentation analysis reveals that technology, range, platform, application, and vertical considerations must be addressed holistically to meet the diverse demands of commercial, homeland security, and defense end users.
Looking ahead, industry success will hinge on collaborative innovation, agile program management, and strategic alignment with policy developments. Organizations that embrace open architectures, invest in cross-domain partnerships, and maintain proactive supply chain strategies will be best positioned to mitigate emerging drone threats and unlock new avenues for market growth.
Market Segmentation & Coverage
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-segmentations:
Technology
Drone Countermeasure Equipment
Cyber Takeover Systems
GPS Spoofers
High-energy lasers
Nets & Net Guns
Radio Frequency Jammers
Drone Monitoring Equipment
Acoustic Sensors (Microphones)
Optical Sensors (Cameras)
Radar
Radio Frequency (RF) Analysers
Range
Less Than 5 km
More Than 5 km
Platform
Ground Based
Handheld
UAV Based
Application
Alerting
Classification & Detection
Locating & Tracking
Verticals
Commercial
Critical Infrastructure
Public Venues
Homeland Security
Military & Defense
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-regions:
Americas
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Latin America
Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Colombia
Peru
Europe, Middle East & Africa
Europe
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
Switzerland
Middle East
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Turkey
Israel
Africa
South Africa
Nigeria
Egypt
Kenya
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
Australia
South Korea
Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia
Singapore
Taiwan
This research report categorizes to delves into recent significant developments and analyze trends in each of the following companies:
Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.
Adani Enterprises Limited
Advanced Radar Technologies S.A.
Airbus SE
BAE Systems PLC
Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL)
Blighter Surveillance Systems Limited
CERBAIR
D-Fend Solutions AD Ltd.
Dedrone Holdings, Inc. by Axon Enterprise, Inc.
DroneShield Limited
Dymstec, Co., Ltd.,
Elbit Systems Ltd.
Excelitas Technologies Corp.
Fortem Technologies, Inc.
General Dynamics Corporation
Hensoldt AG
High Point Aerotechnologies, Inc. by DZYNE Technologies, LLC
INDRA SISTEMAS, S.A.
Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Leonardo S.p.A.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
M2K Technologies Private Limited
Mistral Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Northrop Grumman Corporation
QinetiQ Group PLC
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
RattanIndia Enterprises Limited
Rheinmetall AG
Robin Radar Systems B.V.
Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co KG
RTX Corporation
SAAB AB
Safran S.A.
Sensofusion Oy
Shoghi Communications Ltd.
Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd
Spotter Global
Teledyne FLIR LLC
Thales Group
The Boeing Company
Toshiba Corporation
Zen Technologies Limited
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Contextualizing the Critical Emergence of Anti-Drone Technologies in Response to Rapidly Escalating Aerial Threats
In a security landscape increasingly defined by novel aerial threats, the anti-drone sector has emerged as a critical frontier for technological innovation and risk mitigation. This introduction sets the stage for understanding how remote aerial devices have evolved from niche hobbyist platforms into sophisticated tools with the potential to disrupt critical infrastructure, public events, and sensitive operations.
As counter-drone measures advance, stakeholders across commercial, homeland security, and defense sectors are compelled to reexamine their threat models, operational protocols, and investment priorities. Through this overview, we establish the foundational context for the subsequent analysis, highlighting the interplay between emerging drone capabilities and the defensive technologies designed to neutralize them.
Examining Next-Generation Multi-Sensor Detection and Directed-Energy Countermeasures Revolutionizing Anti-Drone Defense Architectures
Over the past several years, the anti-drone domain has witnessed transformative shifts driven by unprecedented advancements in sensor fusion, directed-energy solutions, and cyber takeover systems. Early iterations of counter-UAV devices relied predominantly on radar detection paired with radio frequency jamming, but today’s solutions seamlessly integrate acoustic sensors, optical cameras, and RF analysers to achieve multilayered situational awareness.
Concurrently, the rise of net-based capture systems and high-energy lasers marks a departure from purely electronic defeat mechanisms toward kinetic and quasi-kinetic strategies. This evolution not only enhances operational flexibility but also underscores a shift in vendor roadmaps from singular point solutions to fully integrated defensive architectures. As a result, organizations are now adopting platform-agnostic frameworks that enable ground-based installations to operate in concert with handheld and UAV-mounted deployable assets, ensuring comprehensive coverage across both short- and long-range scenarios.
Analyzing How 2025 United States Tariffs on Key Anti-Drone Components Are Reshaping Supply Chains and Strategic Partnerships
The imposition of new United States tariffs in early 2025 has reshaped cost structures, supply chain dynamics, and procurement timelines for anti-drone components. While domestic manufacturing incentives have surged, international suppliers confront increased duties on key subassemblies such as RF jammers, GPS spoofers, and optical sensor modules. This has compelled end users to reconfigure their sourcing strategies, balancing the appeal of lower-cost imports against the reliability and responsiveness of local production.
Moreover, heightened tariffs have accelerated collaborations between defense integrators and national laboratories to localize critical technology development. As a transitionary phase, organizations are now prioritizing in-country partnerships to mitigate exposure to fluctuating trade policies. In this context, the cumulative impact of the 2025 duties extends beyond simple price escalations, fundamentally influencing product roadmaps, joint ventures, and the broader innovation ecosystem within which anti-drone systems are conceived and deployed.
Unveiling How Multi-Dimensional Segmentation of Anti-Drone Systems Drives Feature Prioritization and Sector-Specific Integration
Segmentation by technology reveals that efforts to counter and monitor unauthorized drones now rest on two primary pillars: countermeasure and surveillance platforms. Countermeasure equipment encompasses cyber takeover systems that seize control of rogue drones, advanced GPS spoofers engineered to misdirect flight paths, high-energy lasers capable of precision engagement, nets and net guns for kinetic interception, and sophisticated radio frequency jammers designed to sever communication links. Surveillance equipment, on the other hand, integrates acoustic microphones to detect rotor signatures, high-resolution optical cameras for visual confirmation, radar for early warning across open terrain, and RF analysers that profile signal anomalies.
When viewed through the lens of operational range, solutions tailored for engagements within a five-kilometer radius are often optimized for rapid deployment scenarios, whereas systems boasting extended coverage beyond five kilometers cater to wide-area surveillance and proactive threat neutralization. Platform-based segmentation underscores the diversity of deployment modalities, spanning fixed ground-based installations, agile handheld units for short-range protection, and UAV-mounted payloads that extend defensive reach. Functionally, applications are delineated by alerting capabilities that feed real-time warnings, classification and detection algorithms that distinguish between friend and foe, and tracking solutions that maintain continuous custodial custody of an aerial object’s trajectory. Finally, vertical markets-commercial critical infrastructure and public venue protection, homeland security missions, and military and defense operations-drive feature prioritization, regulatory compliance, and integration depth according to sector-specific risk profiles.
Exploring Regional Strategic Variances and Adoption Drivers Shaping Anti-Drone Deployment Across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics in the Americas underscore a robust emphasis on homeland security and critical infrastructure resilience, with national and local agencies investing heavily in both fixed installations and mobile rapid-response kits. In contrast, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa present a tapestry of regulatory frameworks and security doctrines, prompting solution providers to adopt modular architectures that satisfy divergent compliance regimes while facilitating cross-border deployments. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific markets are characterized by accelerated urbanization and dense population centers, which amplify the demand for compact, handheld, and UAV-integrated counter-drone systems that can be swiftly redeployed in response to emerging threats.
Across each territory, partnerships between technology vendors and government agencies drive localized innovation, fueling an ecosystem where regional standards and procurement cycles shape product roadmaps. Consequently, the interplay of these geographic trends informs global go-to-market strategies, alliance formation, and R&D investments, ensuring that regional nuances are reflected in both product design and support infrastructure.
Assessing How Leading Defense Primes and Agile Tech Innovators Are Shaping the Competitive Terrain of Counter-UAV Solutions
Leading players in the anti-drone landscape have distinguished themselves through strategic investments in sensor integration, directed-energy research, and global support networks. Several defense prime contractors have leveraged their existing air defense portfolios to introduce scalable solutions that address both civil and military use cases, while specialized technology firms have disrupted the status quo through modular capture systems and AI-driven detection platforms.
These organizations have also forged alliances with academic institutions and government laboratories to accelerate proof-of-concept trials, refine lethality thresholds for non-kinetic engagements, and validate cross-platform interoperability. As market incumbents pursue consolidation through acquisitions and joint ventures, emerging challengers continue to focus on niche capabilities-such as stealth detection or rapid-deployment handheld jammers-to carve out defensible positions within the broader ecosystem.
Strategic Imperatives for Industry Stakeholders to Enhance Collaboration, Cyber Resilience, and Operational Readiness in Counter-UAV Programs
Industry leaders should prioritize the establishment of open-architecture frameworks that facilitate rapid integration of new sensor types and defeat mechanisms. By cultivating collaborative partnerships across academia, government research entities, and technology startups, organizations can accelerate innovation cycles and distribute risk. Furthermore, investment in robust cybersecurity protocols is essential to safeguard against adversarial exploitation of connected counter-drone networks.
In parallel, decision-makers must develop comprehensive training programs that bridge the gap between advanced system capabilities and tactical operator proficiency. Finally, aligning procurement strategies with evolving regulatory landscapes and tariff environments will enhance supply chain resilience and ensure that both domestic and international deployments remain agile in the face of policy shifts.
Detailing a Two-Tiered Research Framework Integrating Primary Stakeholder Interviews and Secondary Data Triangulation for Robust Insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines a rigorous two-tiered approach. Primary insights were obtained through structured interviews with defense officials, security integrators, and technology architects, supplemented by in-depth workshops that validated emerging capability roadmaps. Secondary data was gathered from a curated selection of government publications, open-source intelligence repositories, and peer-reviewed technical journals to cross-verify technology readiness levels and deployment case studies.
Data triangulation techniques were employed to reconcile differing viewpoints, while quantitative trend analysis provided directional understanding of adoption trajectories. Finally, scenario planning exercises were conducted to test the robustness of strategic recommendations under varied regulatory and geopolitical contingencies.
Synthesizing Key Findings and Strategic Implications to Guide Future Anti-Drone Ecosystem Development
In summary, the anti-drone market is transitioning from isolated point solutions toward cohesive defensive ecosystems that balance kinetic and non-kinetic modalities. Market dynamics are shaped by evolving threat vectors, shifting regulatory regimes, and the global repositioning of supply chains in response to new tariff structures. Segmentation analysis reveals that technology, range, platform, application, and vertical considerations must be addressed holistically to meet the diverse demands of commercial, homeland security, and defense end users.
Looking ahead, industry success will hinge on collaborative innovation, agile program management, and strategic alignment with policy developments. Organizations that embrace open architectures, invest in cross-domain partnerships, and maintain proactive supply chain strategies will be best positioned to mitigate emerging drone threats and unlock new avenues for market growth.
Market Segmentation & Coverage
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-segmentations:
Technology
Drone Countermeasure Equipment
Cyber Takeover Systems
GPS Spoofers
High-energy lasers
Nets & Net Guns
Radio Frequency Jammers
Drone Monitoring Equipment
Acoustic Sensors (Microphones)
Optical Sensors (Cameras)
Radar
Radio Frequency (RF) Analysers
Range
Less Than 5 km
More Than 5 km
Platform
Ground Based
Handheld
UAV Based
Application
Alerting
Classification & Detection
Locating & Tracking
Verticals
Commercial
Critical Infrastructure
Public Venues
Homeland Security
Military & Defense
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-regions:
Americas
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Latin America
Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Colombia
Peru
Europe, Middle East & Africa
Europe
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
Switzerland
Middle East
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Turkey
Israel
Africa
South Africa
Nigeria
Egypt
Kenya
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
Australia
South Korea
Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia
Singapore
Taiwan
This research report categorizes to delves into recent significant developments and analyze trends in each of the following companies:
Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.
Adani Enterprises Limited
Advanced Radar Technologies S.A.
Airbus SE
BAE Systems PLC
Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL)
Blighter Surveillance Systems Limited
CERBAIR
D-Fend Solutions AD Ltd.
Dedrone Holdings, Inc. by Axon Enterprise, Inc.
DroneShield Limited
Dymstec, Co., Ltd.,
Elbit Systems Ltd.
Excelitas Technologies Corp.
Fortem Technologies, Inc.
General Dynamics Corporation
Hensoldt AG
High Point Aerotechnologies, Inc. by DZYNE Technologies, LLC
INDRA SISTEMAS, S.A.
Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Leonardo S.p.A.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
M2K Technologies Private Limited
Mistral Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Northrop Grumman Corporation
QinetiQ Group PLC
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
RattanIndia Enterprises Limited
Rheinmetall AG
Robin Radar Systems B.V.
Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co KG
RTX Corporation
SAAB AB
Safran S.A.
Sensofusion Oy
Shoghi Communications Ltd.
Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd
Spotter Global
Teledyne FLIR LLC
Thales Group
The Boeing Company
Toshiba Corporation
Zen Technologies Limited
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency & Pricing
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning for real-time drone threat detection and classification
- 5.2. Adoption of high-energy laser systems for countering swarms of unauthorized aerial vehicles at mass gatherings
- 5.3. Development of portable multi-sensor anti-drone kits combining radar, radio frequency sensors, and signal jammers for tactical deployment
- 5.4. Regulatory advancements driving standardization of anti-drone protocols across military, law enforcement, and civil aviation sectors
- 5.5. Shift towards networked drone detection architectures with cloud-based analytics for persistent airspace security monitoring
- 5.6. Emergence of cyber-physical defense strategies targeting drone communication vulnerabilities with encryption and spoofing countermeasures
- 5.7. Use of AI-driven acoustic recognition systems for passive drone identification in noise-sensitive urban zones
- 5.8. Expansion of autonomous drone interception units with edge AI for onboard decision-making
- 5.9. Deployment of bio-inspired anti-drone drones mimicking predator flight dynamics
- 5.10. Implementation of blockchain-based drone traffic logging for tamper-proof threat forensics
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Anti-Drone Market, by Technology
- 8.1. Drone Countermeasure Equipment
- 8.1.1. Cyber Takeover Systems
- 8.1.2. GPS Spoofers
- 8.1.3. High-energy lasers
- 8.1.4. Nets & Net Guns
- 8.1.5. Radio Frequency Jammers
- 8.2. Drone Monitoring Equipment
- 8.2.1. Acoustic Sensors (Microphones)
- 8.2.2. Optical Sensors (Cameras)
- 8.2.3. Radar
- 8.2.4. Radio Frequency (RF) Analysers
- 9. Anti-Drone Market, by Range
- 9.1. Less Than 5 km
- 9.2. More Than 5 km
- 10. Anti-Drone Market, by Platform
- 10.1. Ground Based
- 10.2. Handheld
- 10.3. UAV Based
- 11. Anti-Drone Market, by Application
- 11.1. Alerting
- 11.2. Classification & Detection
- 11.3. Locating & Tracking
- 12. Anti-Drone Market, by Verticals
- 12.1. Commercial
- 12.1.1. Critical Infrastructure
- 12.1.2. Public Venues
- 12.2. Homeland Security
- 12.3. Military & Defense
- 13. Anti-Drone Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Anti-Drone Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Anti-Drone Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.
- 16.3.2. Adani Enterprises Limited
- 16.3.3. Advanced Radar Technologies S.A.
- 16.3.4. Airbus SE
- 16.3.5. BAE Systems PLC
- 16.3.6. Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL)
- 16.3.7. Blighter Surveillance Systems Limited
- 16.3.8. CERBAIR
- 16.3.9. D-Fend Solutions AD Ltd.
- 16.3.10. Dedrone Holdings, Inc. by Axon Enterprise, Inc.
- 16.3.11. DroneShield Limited
- 16.3.12. Dymstec, Co., Ltd.,
- 16.3.13. Elbit Systems Ltd.
- 16.3.14. Excelitas Technologies Corp.
- 16.3.15. Fortem Technologies, Inc.
- 16.3.16. General Dynamics Corporation
- 16.3.17. Hensoldt AG
- 16.3.18. High Point Aerotechnologies, Inc. by DZYNE Technologies, LLC
- 16.3.19. INDRA SISTEMAS, S.A.
- 16.3.20. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
- 16.3.21. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 16.3.22. Leidos Holdings, Inc.
- 16.3.23. Leonardo S.p.A.
- 16.3.24. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 16.3.25. M2K Technologies Private Limited
- 16.3.26. Mistral Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
- 16.3.27. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 16.3.28. QinetiQ Group PLC
- 16.3.29. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
- 16.3.30. RattanIndia Enterprises Limited
- 16.3.31. Rheinmetall AG
- 16.3.32. Robin Radar Systems B.V.
- 16.3.33. Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co KG
- 16.3.34. RTX Corporation
- 16.3.35. SAAB AB
- 16.3.36. Safran S.A.
- 16.3.37. Sensofusion Oy
- 16.3.38. Shoghi Communications Ltd.
- 16.3.39. Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd
- 16.3.40. Spotter Global
- 16.3.41. Teledyne FLIR LLC
- 16.3.42. Thales Group
- 16.3.43. The Boeing Company
- 16.3.44. Toshiba Corporation
- 16.3.45. Zen Technologies Limited
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
