Airport Security Equipment Market by Equipment Type (Access Control Systems, Baggage Handling Systems, Biometric Systems), Technology (3D Imaging, AI Based Solutions, Analog Imaging), Application, End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Airport Security Equipment Market was valued at USD 14.18 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 15.35 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.27%, reaching USD 26.79 billion by 2032.
A clear and practical orientation that frames immediate priorities for procurement, integration, and operational resilience across modern airport security environments
This executive summary opens with a clear orientation to the evolving operational environment for airport security equipment, situating reader priorities within the context of technology maturation, regulatory shifts, and supply chain complexity.
Stakeholders face a landscape where legacy screening systems must coexist with advanced imaging, biometric enrollment, and AI‑driven analytics while preserving throughput and traveler experience. Procurement officers and system integrators now balance resilient sourcing against lifecycle cost management, and senior leaders must prioritize interoperability and upgradeability to avoid stranded assets. This introduction establishes the report’s focus on practical implications, aligning strategic choices with operational constraints so readers can translate insight into immediate tactical and midterm actions.
How converging sensor innovations, AI adoption, regulatory pressure, and passenger expectations are fundamentally reshaping procurement and deployment strategies in airport security
Airport security is undergoing a set of transformative shifts driven by technology convergence, heightened regulatory focus, and changing traveler behavior that together reshape capital allocation and operational norms.
First, imaging and sensing capabilities are transitioning from analog to digital paradigms, enabling richer data capture and automated threat detection. Concurrently, biometric systems are moving beyond single‑factor identity checks into continuous, frictionless verification that supports touchless passenger flows. Artificial intelligence and machine learning enhance detection accuracy and operational efficiency, but they also require new governance frameworks and explainability standards to satisfy regulators and procurement committees. In parallel, sustainability mandates and lifecycle cost imperatives encourage longer service horizons, modular upgrades, and the adoption of aftermarket maintenance models. These shifts force vendors and operators to reconfigure roadmaps: solution providers must prioritize software‑centric offerings with clear upgrade paths, and airports must plan phased implementations that balance safety, throughput, and passenger experience. Ultimately, the confluence of these forces creates both operational risk and commercial opportunity, prompting stakeholders to adopt phased modernization plans that emphasize interoperability, data governance, and supplier diversification.
Operational and procurement consequences of United States tariff measures in 2025 that reshuffle supplier advantages and elevate the importance of resilient sourcing and contractual protections
Recent United States tariff actions implemented in 2025 introduce a series of cumulative impacts across procurement cycles, supplier strategies, and operational planning for airport security equipment.
Procurement teams must now reassess total landed cost assumptions and supplier selection criteria as tariff layers amplify volatility in capital expenditures. Vendors with localized manufacturing or diversified supply chains gain comparative advantage, while those reliant on single‑country component sourcing face margin pressure and the need to reprice or re‑engineer product offerings. Supply chain managers will prioritize nearshoring and multi‑tier supplier mapping to reduce exposure, and integrators will embed contingency clauses into contracts to manage cost pass‑through and schedule risk. On the operational side, maintenance and aftermarket service strategies will shift toward extended service agreements and parts standardization to mitigate spare parts inflation and extended lead times. Regulatory compliance teams should anticipate prolonged certification timelines if component substitutions alter system characteristics, and capital planners must build greater flexibility into upgrade timetables. These cumulative implications compel a reorientation of sourcing policies toward resilience, cross‑border supplier intelligence, and contractual mechanisms that share risk across the value chain.
Deep segmentation analysis that converts equipment, technology, application, end user and distribution distinctions into prioritized product and channel strategies for market impact
Segmentation analysis reveals actionable pathways for product strategy and go‑to‑market planning by exposing where investments yield the highest operational leverage and differentiation.
Based on equipment type, the landscape spans Access Control Systems, Baggage Handling Systems, Biometric Systems, Explosive Trace Detection Systems, Metal Detectors, and X‑Ray Inspection Systems. Within Access Control Systems, automated gates, barriers, and turnstiles support secure passenger flows and friction reduction. Baggage Handling Systems divide between conveyor systems and sortation systems, each carrying distinct operational performance constraints and integration complexity. Biometric Systems break down into face recognition, fingerprint recognition, and iris recognition, enabling varying degrees of identity assurance and user convenience. Explosive Trace Detection Systems include fluorescence detection, ion mobility spectrometry, and mass spectrometry, reflecting a trade‑off between sensitivity and operational throughput. Metal detectors encompass handheld detectors, portal detectors, and walk‑through detectors that differ by application and mobility. X‑Ray Inspection Systems range from computed tomography scanners to dual view, multi view, and single view X‑ray solutions, with computed tomography further dividing into dual energy CT and multi energy CT architectures that support advanced material discrimination.
Based on technology, stakeholders evaluate 3D imaging, AI‑based solutions, analog imaging, and digital imaging. 3D imaging further segments into computed tomography and millimeter wave scanning, while AI‑based solutions rely on deep learning algorithms and machine learning algorithms that drive automation and detection confidence. Based on application, differentiation emerges across baggage screening, cargo screening, passenger screening, and vehicle inspection. Baggage screening separates into hold baggage scanning and in line baggage scanning, and passenger screening distinguishes body scanning from carry on screening, each presenting unique workflow and throughput trade‑offs. Based on end user, procurement priorities reflect the needs of airline operators, airport authorities, government agencies, and third‑party security providers, with government agencies further comprised of border patrol, customs, and homeland security functions that impose specific compliance requirements. Based on distribution channel, distribution models include aftermarket services, direct sales, distributors and resellers, and online platforms; aftermarket services emphasize maintenance and upgrades, distributors and resellers split between independent distributors and OEM distributors, and online platforms span e‑commerce marketplaces and manufacturer websites that alter procurement behavior and service expectations.
These segmentation vectors intersect to create differentiated demand pockets where vendors can tailor value propositions. For instance, AI‑enabled computed tomography solutions marketed via direct sales and supported by robust aftermarket services will appeal to metropolitan airports prioritizing hold baggage scanning modernization, while modular biometric suites sold through integrator partnerships will resonate with airport authorities focused on passenger screening efficiency. Strategic planners should map these segment intersections to prioritize R&D spending, channel investments, and collaboration partnerships that deliver distinct operational value.
How varying regional demand drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific influence procurement priorities, certification complexity, and supplier competitiveness
Regional dynamics shape procurement behavior, regulatory expectations, and deployment timelines, and understanding these variations is essential for strategic market entry and partnership selection.
In the Americas, procurement cycles lean toward modernization projects driven by capacity growth and security mandates, with a strong emphasis on integrating digital imaging and biometric systems to improve throughput. The Americas region shows higher propensity for public‑private partnership models and aftermarket service agreements that extend equipment lifecycles. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous policy landscape where regulatory harmonization and urban security requirements drive demand for advanced detection technologies; vendors must navigate complex certification protocols and localized procurement preferences in this combined region. The Middle East component often emphasizes large‑scale programmatic deployments tied to major airport expansion projects, while parts of Africa focus on cost‑effective, maintainable solutions. Asia‑Pacific demonstrates rapid adoption of AI‑enabled screening and contactless biometrics, driven by high passenger volumes and investments in smart airport initiatives. Supply chain considerations in Asia‑Pacific favor suppliers with regional manufacturing footprints and responsive aftermarket networks. Across all regions, environmental sustainability and lifecycle emissions increasingly influence procurement criteria, prompting buyers to value modular upgradeability and energy‑efficient designs. Recognizing these regional nuances enables vendors to tailor commercial models, certification strategies, and local partnerships to accelerate adoption and reduce go‑to‑market friction.
Capability mapping and competitive dynamics that highlight incumbent strengths, emergent software‑driven challengers, and the growing importance of integration and aftermarket services
Competitive dynamics in airport security equipment are defined by a combination of legacy incumbency, technological differentiation, systems integration capability, and aftermarket service excellence.
Leading manufacturers retain positions through deep certification knowledge, broad product portfolios, and long enterprise relationships with airports and government agencies. At the same time, a cohort of technology challengers is emerging on the strength of software‑driven analytics, AI detection models, and compact 3D imaging solutions that enable modular deployments. Systems integrators that can orchestrate multi‑vendor ecosystems and deliver verified end‑to‑end performance often win large programs, particularly when they can demonstrate proven integration with biometric identity platforms and baggage handling infrastructure. Service providers who offer predictive maintenance, spare parts availability, and remote diagnostics differentiate on lifecycle cost and uptime, which becomes a decisive factor for airports operating under tight budgetary and performance targets. Competitive positioning also hinges on geographic reach: vendors with localized manufacturing, certified regional support centers, and partnerships with independent distributors tend to capture projects that require tight lead‑time and on‑site expertise. Strategic alliances between hardware vendors and AI software firms are reshaping the value chain, and next‑generation business models increasingly feature outcome‑based contracts and shared risk arrangements that align incentives across buyers and suppliers.
Prioritized, measurable recommendations for leaders to enhance interoperability, supply chain resilience, and commercial models that align incentives and drive adoption
Industry leaders must act decisively to convert insight into competitive advantage by aligning investment priorities with measurable operational outcomes.
First, prioritize interoperability and open architecture to ensure future upgradeability and to reduce integration friction. Procurement specifications should require modular hardware and software APIs that permit phased enhancements and allow airports to adopt AI detection improvements without full system replacement. Second, diversify sourcing and qualify alternate suppliers to mitigate tariff exposure and component shortages; nearshoring select subassembly production and developing multi‑tier supplier maps will reduce delivery risk. Third, pivot commercial models toward longer aftermarket agreements and performance‑based elements that spread capital impact and incentivize uptime; predictive maintenance and remote diagnostics should be central to service offerings. Fourth, embed data governance and explainability standards into AI deployments, creating audit‑ready models and traceable decision logs to meet regulatory scrutiny. Finally, invest in partnership ecosystems that pair hardware excellence with specialized software vendors and systems integrators, enabling bundled value propositions that accelerate procurement approval and reduce implementation timelines. By sequencing these actions-starting with interoperability and supplier resilience-leaders can protect core operations while accelerating adoption of value‑creating technologies.
Transparent mixed‑method research approach combining stakeholder engagements, technical validation, and analytical frameworks to ensure actionable and credible insights
The research underpinning this summary relies on a mixed‑method approach designed to balance primary stakeholder intelligence with rigorous secondary validation and technical analysis.
Primary inputs included structured engagements with airport procurement officers, systems integrators, security regulators, and technology vendors to capture firsthand perspectives on deployment challenges, certification dynamics, and procurement priorities. Secondary inputs comprised technical standards, regulatory guidance publications, product specifications, and publicly available program announcements that provide verification of claimed capabilities and certification status. Analytical frameworks applied include technology readiness assessment, supplier risk scoring, segmentation cross‑mapping, and scenario analysis to evaluate the interplay between tariffs, supply chain adjustments, and adoption pathways. Validation occurred through cross‑triangulation of vendor claims with operator feedback and independent certification references, ensuring that conclusions reflect operational realities rather than marketing positioning. The methodology emphasizes transparency, repeatability, and stakeholder relevance to ensure that findings are actionable for procurement teams, solution architects, and executive decision makers.
Synthesis of strategic implications and final takeaways that guide operators, vendors, and investors toward resilient and value‑oriented modernization strategies
In conclusion, the airport security equipment landscape is in a phase of pragmatic transformation where technological progress, regulatory expectations, and supply chain realities converge to redefine procurement and operational strategies.
Operators and vendors that embrace modular architectures, strengthen supply chain resilience, and adopt data‑centric governance for AI solutions will be best positioned to capture value while containing risk. The 2025 tariff environment amplifies the need for diversified sourcing and stronger service agreements, and regional dynamics necessitate differentiated commercial approaches across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific. Strategic collaboration between hardware manufacturers, AI innovators, systems integrators, and service providers will accelerate safe, efficient, and customer‑centric deployments. Ultimately, organizations that align technology investments with clear operational metrics, contractual protections, and a phased modernization roadmap will preserve security performance while optimizing total lifecycle outcomes.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A clear and practical orientation that frames immediate priorities for procurement, integration, and operational resilience across modern airport security environments
This executive summary opens with a clear orientation to the evolving operational environment for airport security equipment, situating reader priorities within the context of technology maturation, regulatory shifts, and supply chain complexity.
Stakeholders face a landscape where legacy screening systems must coexist with advanced imaging, biometric enrollment, and AI‑driven analytics while preserving throughput and traveler experience. Procurement officers and system integrators now balance resilient sourcing against lifecycle cost management, and senior leaders must prioritize interoperability and upgradeability to avoid stranded assets. This introduction establishes the report’s focus on practical implications, aligning strategic choices with operational constraints so readers can translate insight into immediate tactical and midterm actions.
How converging sensor innovations, AI adoption, regulatory pressure, and passenger expectations are fundamentally reshaping procurement and deployment strategies in airport security
Airport security is undergoing a set of transformative shifts driven by technology convergence, heightened regulatory focus, and changing traveler behavior that together reshape capital allocation and operational norms.
First, imaging and sensing capabilities are transitioning from analog to digital paradigms, enabling richer data capture and automated threat detection. Concurrently, biometric systems are moving beyond single‑factor identity checks into continuous, frictionless verification that supports touchless passenger flows. Artificial intelligence and machine learning enhance detection accuracy and operational efficiency, but they also require new governance frameworks and explainability standards to satisfy regulators and procurement committees. In parallel, sustainability mandates and lifecycle cost imperatives encourage longer service horizons, modular upgrades, and the adoption of aftermarket maintenance models. These shifts force vendors and operators to reconfigure roadmaps: solution providers must prioritize software‑centric offerings with clear upgrade paths, and airports must plan phased implementations that balance safety, throughput, and passenger experience. Ultimately, the confluence of these forces creates both operational risk and commercial opportunity, prompting stakeholders to adopt phased modernization plans that emphasize interoperability, data governance, and supplier diversification.
Operational and procurement consequences of United States tariff measures in 2025 that reshuffle supplier advantages and elevate the importance of resilient sourcing and contractual protections
Recent United States tariff actions implemented in 2025 introduce a series of cumulative impacts across procurement cycles, supplier strategies, and operational planning for airport security equipment.
Procurement teams must now reassess total landed cost assumptions and supplier selection criteria as tariff layers amplify volatility in capital expenditures. Vendors with localized manufacturing or diversified supply chains gain comparative advantage, while those reliant on single‑country component sourcing face margin pressure and the need to reprice or re‑engineer product offerings. Supply chain managers will prioritize nearshoring and multi‑tier supplier mapping to reduce exposure, and integrators will embed contingency clauses into contracts to manage cost pass‑through and schedule risk. On the operational side, maintenance and aftermarket service strategies will shift toward extended service agreements and parts standardization to mitigate spare parts inflation and extended lead times. Regulatory compliance teams should anticipate prolonged certification timelines if component substitutions alter system characteristics, and capital planners must build greater flexibility into upgrade timetables. These cumulative implications compel a reorientation of sourcing policies toward resilience, cross‑border supplier intelligence, and contractual mechanisms that share risk across the value chain.
Deep segmentation analysis that converts equipment, technology, application, end user and distribution distinctions into prioritized product and channel strategies for market impact
Segmentation analysis reveals actionable pathways for product strategy and go‑to‑market planning by exposing where investments yield the highest operational leverage and differentiation.
Based on equipment type, the landscape spans Access Control Systems, Baggage Handling Systems, Biometric Systems, Explosive Trace Detection Systems, Metal Detectors, and X‑Ray Inspection Systems. Within Access Control Systems, automated gates, barriers, and turnstiles support secure passenger flows and friction reduction. Baggage Handling Systems divide between conveyor systems and sortation systems, each carrying distinct operational performance constraints and integration complexity. Biometric Systems break down into face recognition, fingerprint recognition, and iris recognition, enabling varying degrees of identity assurance and user convenience. Explosive Trace Detection Systems include fluorescence detection, ion mobility spectrometry, and mass spectrometry, reflecting a trade‑off between sensitivity and operational throughput. Metal detectors encompass handheld detectors, portal detectors, and walk‑through detectors that differ by application and mobility. X‑Ray Inspection Systems range from computed tomography scanners to dual view, multi view, and single view X‑ray solutions, with computed tomography further dividing into dual energy CT and multi energy CT architectures that support advanced material discrimination.
Based on technology, stakeholders evaluate 3D imaging, AI‑based solutions, analog imaging, and digital imaging. 3D imaging further segments into computed tomography and millimeter wave scanning, while AI‑based solutions rely on deep learning algorithms and machine learning algorithms that drive automation and detection confidence. Based on application, differentiation emerges across baggage screening, cargo screening, passenger screening, and vehicle inspection. Baggage screening separates into hold baggage scanning and in line baggage scanning, and passenger screening distinguishes body scanning from carry on screening, each presenting unique workflow and throughput trade‑offs. Based on end user, procurement priorities reflect the needs of airline operators, airport authorities, government agencies, and third‑party security providers, with government agencies further comprised of border patrol, customs, and homeland security functions that impose specific compliance requirements. Based on distribution channel, distribution models include aftermarket services, direct sales, distributors and resellers, and online platforms; aftermarket services emphasize maintenance and upgrades, distributors and resellers split between independent distributors and OEM distributors, and online platforms span e‑commerce marketplaces and manufacturer websites that alter procurement behavior and service expectations.
These segmentation vectors intersect to create differentiated demand pockets where vendors can tailor value propositions. For instance, AI‑enabled computed tomography solutions marketed via direct sales and supported by robust aftermarket services will appeal to metropolitan airports prioritizing hold baggage scanning modernization, while modular biometric suites sold through integrator partnerships will resonate with airport authorities focused on passenger screening efficiency. Strategic planners should map these segment intersections to prioritize R&D spending, channel investments, and collaboration partnerships that deliver distinct operational value.
How varying regional demand drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific influence procurement priorities, certification complexity, and supplier competitiveness
Regional dynamics shape procurement behavior, regulatory expectations, and deployment timelines, and understanding these variations is essential for strategic market entry and partnership selection.
In the Americas, procurement cycles lean toward modernization projects driven by capacity growth and security mandates, with a strong emphasis on integrating digital imaging and biometric systems to improve throughput. The Americas region shows higher propensity for public‑private partnership models and aftermarket service agreements that extend equipment lifecycles. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous policy landscape where regulatory harmonization and urban security requirements drive demand for advanced detection technologies; vendors must navigate complex certification protocols and localized procurement preferences in this combined region. The Middle East component often emphasizes large‑scale programmatic deployments tied to major airport expansion projects, while parts of Africa focus on cost‑effective, maintainable solutions. Asia‑Pacific demonstrates rapid adoption of AI‑enabled screening and contactless biometrics, driven by high passenger volumes and investments in smart airport initiatives. Supply chain considerations in Asia‑Pacific favor suppliers with regional manufacturing footprints and responsive aftermarket networks. Across all regions, environmental sustainability and lifecycle emissions increasingly influence procurement criteria, prompting buyers to value modular upgradeability and energy‑efficient designs. Recognizing these regional nuances enables vendors to tailor commercial models, certification strategies, and local partnerships to accelerate adoption and reduce go‑to‑market friction.
Capability mapping and competitive dynamics that highlight incumbent strengths, emergent software‑driven challengers, and the growing importance of integration and aftermarket services
Competitive dynamics in airport security equipment are defined by a combination of legacy incumbency, technological differentiation, systems integration capability, and aftermarket service excellence.
Leading manufacturers retain positions through deep certification knowledge, broad product portfolios, and long enterprise relationships with airports and government agencies. At the same time, a cohort of technology challengers is emerging on the strength of software‑driven analytics, AI detection models, and compact 3D imaging solutions that enable modular deployments. Systems integrators that can orchestrate multi‑vendor ecosystems and deliver verified end‑to‑end performance often win large programs, particularly when they can demonstrate proven integration with biometric identity platforms and baggage handling infrastructure. Service providers who offer predictive maintenance, spare parts availability, and remote diagnostics differentiate on lifecycle cost and uptime, which becomes a decisive factor for airports operating under tight budgetary and performance targets. Competitive positioning also hinges on geographic reach: vendors with localized manufacturing, certified regional support centers, and partnerships with independent distributors tend to capture projects that require tight lead‑time and on‑site expertise. Strategic alliances between hardware vendors and AI software firms are reshaping the value chain, and next‑generation business models increasingly feature outcome‑based contracts and shared risk arrangements that align incentives across buyers and suppliers.
Prioritized, measurable recommendations for leaders to enhance interoperability, supply chain resilience, and commercial models that align incentives and drive adoption
Industry leaders must act decisively to convert insight into competitive advantage by aligning investment priorities with measurable operational outcomes.
First, prioritize interoperability and open architecture to ensure future upgradeability and to reduce integration friction. Procurement specifications should require modular hardware and software APIs that permit phased enhancements and allow airports to adopt AI detection improvements without full system replacement. Second, diversify sourcing and qualify alternate suppliers to mitigate tariff exposure and component shortages; nearshoring select subassembly production and developing multi‑tier supplier maps will reduce delivery risk. Third, pivot commercial models toward longer aftermarket agreements and performance‑based elements that spread capital impact and incentivize uptime; predictive maintenance and remote diagnostics should be central to service offerings. Fourth, embed data governance and explainability standards into AI deployments, creating audit‑ready models and traceable decision logs to meet regulatory scrutiny. Finally, invest in partnership ecosystems that pair hardware excellence with specialized software vendors and systems integrators, enabling bundled value propositions that accelerate procurement approval and reduce implementation timelines. By sequencing these actions-starting with interoperability and supplier resilience-leaders can protect core operations while accelerating adoption of value‑creating technologies.
Transparent mixed‑method research approach combining stakeholder engagements, technical validation, and analytical frameworks to ensure actionable and credible insights
The research underpinning this summary relies on a mixed‑method approach designed to balance primary stakeholder intelligence with rigorous secondary validation and technical analysis.
Primary inputs included structured engagements with airport procurement officers, systems integrators, security regulators, and technology vendors to capture firsthand perspectives on deployment challenges, certification dynamics, and procurement priorities. Secondary inputs comprised technical standards, regulatory guidance publications, product specifications, and publicly available program announcements that provide verification of claimed capabilities and certification status. Analytical frameworks applied include technology readiness assessment, supplier risk scoring, segmentation cross‑mapping, and scenario analysis to evaluate the interplay between tariffs, supply chain adjustments, and adoption pathways. Validation occurred through cross‑triangulation of vendor claims with operator feedback and independent certification references, ensuring that conclusions reflect operational realities rather than marketing positioning. The methodology emphasizes transparency, repeatability, and stakeholder relevance to ensure that findings are actionable for procurement teams, solution architects, and executive decision makers.
Synthesis of strategic implications and final takeaways that guide operators, vendors, and investors toward resilient and value‑oriented modernization strategies
In conclusion, the airport security equipment landscape is in a phase of pragmatic transformation where technological progress, regulatory expectations, and supply chain realities converge to redefine procurement and operational strategies.
Operators and vendors that embrace modular architectures, strengthen supply chain resilience, and adopt data‑centric governance for AI solutions will be best positioned to capture value while containing risk. The 2025 tariff environment amplifies the need for diversified sourcing and stronger service agreements, and regional dynamics necessitate differentiated commercial approaches across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific. Strategic collaboration between hardware manufacturers, AI innovators, systems integrators, and service providers will accelerate safe, efficient, and customer‑centric deployments. Ultimately, organizations that align technology investments with clear operational metrics, contractual protections, and a phased modernization roadmap will preserve security performance while optimizing total lifecycle outcomes.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
180 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence-powered threat detection systems for faster and more accurate passenger screening
- 5.2. Adoption of computed tomography scanners enabling automated 3D baggage analysis to improve security throughput
- 5.3. Deployment of biometric authentication kiosks using facial recognition and fingerprint scanning to streamline boarding
- 5.4. Incorporation of millimeter-wave body scanners with privacy filters to enhance detection and passenger comfort
- 5.5. Implementation of cloud-based security operations platforms for centralized monitoring and real-time data analytics
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Airport Security Equipment Market, by Equipment Type
- 8.1. Access Control Systems
- 8.1.1. Automated Gates
- 8.1.2. Barriers
- 8.1.3. Turnstiles
- 8.2. Baggage Handling Systems
- 8.2.1. Conveyor Systems
- 8.2.2. Sortation Systems
- 8.3. Biometric Systems
- 8.3.1. Face Recognition
- 8.3.2. Fingerprint Recognition
- 8.3.3. Iris Recognition
- 8.4. Explosive Trace Detection Systems
- 8.4.1. Fluorescence Detection
- 8.4.2. Ion Mobility Spectrometry
- 8.4.3. Mass Spectrometry
- 8.5. Metal Detectors
- 8.5.1. Handheld Detectors
- 8.5.2. Portal Detectors
- 8.5.3. Walk Through Detectors
- 8.6. X-Ray Inspection Systems
- 8.6.1. Computed Tomography Scanner
- 8.6.1.1. Dual Energy CT
- 8.6.1.2. Multi Energy CT
- 8.6.2. Dual View X-Ray
- 8.6.3. Multi View X-Ray
- 8.6.4. Single View X-Ray
- 9. Airport Security Equipment Market, by Technology
- 9.1. 3D Imaging
- 9.1.1. Computed Tomography
- 9.1.2. Millimeter Wave Scanning
- 9.2. AI Based Solutions
- 9.2.1. Deep Learning Algorithms
- 9.2.2. Machine Learning Algorithms
- 9.3. Analog Imaging
- 9.4. Digital Imaging
- 10. Airport Security Equipment Market, by Application
- 10.1. Baggage Screening
- 10.1.1. Hold Baggage Scanning
- 10.1.2. In Line Baggage Scanning
- 10.2. Cargo Screening
- 10.3. Passenger Screening
- 10.3.1. Body Scanning
- 10.3.2. Carry On Screening
- 10.4. Vehicle Inspection
- 11. Airport Security Equipment Market, by End User
- 11.1. Airline Operators
- 11.2. Airport Authority
- 11.3. Government Agencies
- 11.3.1. Border Patrol
- 11.3.2. Customs
- 11.3.3. Homeland Security
- 11.4. Third Party Security Providers
- 12. Airport Security Equipment Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Offline
- 12.2. Online
- 12.2.1. E-Commerce Marketplaces
- 12.2.2. Manufacturer Websites
- 13. Airport Security Equipment Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Airport Security Equipment Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Airport Security Equipment Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Smiths Detection Group Ltd.
- 16.3.2. Rapiscan Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.3. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 16.3.4. Leidos Holdings, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Nuctech Company Limited
- 16.3.6. Analogic Corporation
- 16.3.7. Astrophysics, Inc.
- 16.3.8. Gilardoni S.p.A.
- 16.3.9. ADANI Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.10. NEC Corporation
- 16.3.11. Hitachi, Ltd.
- 16.3.12. Siemens AG
- 16.3.13. Axis Communications AB
- 16.3.14. Dahua Technology Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.15. Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.16. Westminster Group Plc
- 16.3.17. VOTI Detection Inc.
- 16.3.18. Evolv Technology, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
