Airport Passenger Screening System Market by Technology (AI Video Analytics, Computed Tomography, Explosive Trace Detector), Passenger Type (Business Passenger, Crew, Leisure Passenger), Screening Type, Checkpoint Location, Deployment Model, End User - Gl
Description
The Airport Passenger Screening System Market was valued at USD 2.38 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.63 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 10.84%, reaching USD 5.42 billion by 2032.
A concise and authoritative introduction explaining how technological integration, operational demands, and passenger expectations are reshaping airport screening strategies
The airport passenger screening environment stands at an inflection point where technological advancement, evolving threat profiles, and heightened passenger expectations converge. Screening systems have moved beyond singular hardware platforms to integrated solutions that blend imaging, detection, analytics, and operational orchestration. This evolution has necessitated a rethinking of procurement, operations, and regulatory compliance frameworks across airports, airlines, private contractors, and government agencies.
Stakeholders now prioritize end-to-end workflows that reduce throughput friction while preserving or enhancing detection performance. The introduction of advanced imaging modalities and intelligent software has shifted emphasis toward systems that can seamlessly process high volumes of passengers and baggage with minimal manual intervention. As a result, decision-makers are evaluating how new technologies integrate with existing checkpoint footprints, staffing models, and passenger experience initiatives, while balancing lifecycle costs and long-term resilience.
An incisive analysis of the major technological and operational shifts redefining detection performance, automation, and checkpoint workflows across modern airports
The landscape for passenger screening is undergoing transformative shifts driven by both technological innovation and operational imperatives. Artificial intelligence and machine learning now underpin rapid image triage and anomaly detection, enabling screening systems to surface higher-confidence alerts while reducing false positives. At the same time, computed tomography has matured from dual-energy scanning into sophisticated 3D imaging with material discrimination capabilities that materially improve threat characterization and reduce unnecessary manual bag checks.
Concurrently, growth in biometric identification and automated passenger processing has prompted a reconfiguration of checkpoint flows, enabling touchless interactions that enhance speed without compromising security. This movement toward automation pairs with a renewed focus on cybersecurity, as networked screening assets introduce additional attack surfaces. In addition, supply chain volatility and regulatory updates compel operators to favor modular, upgradeable architectures that allow incremental capability additions. Taken together, these shifts encourage operators to adopt a systems-level perspective that harmonizes hardware, software, and human processes for safer and more efficient screening outcomes.
A thorough examination of how evolving U.S. tariff measures through 2025 are reshaping procurement strategies, supplier localization, and contract risk allocation across the screening ecosystem
U.S. tariff adjustments through 2025 have created material procurement and supply chain implications for producers and operators of screening equipment. Tariff measures affecting certain electronic components and finished devices have increased landed costs for some imported hardware, prompting vendors to reassess sourcing strategies, reprice offerings, and adjust delivery timelines. These dynamics have also accelerated supplier efforts to localize assembly and establish alternative component suppliers to mitigate duty exposure and inventory risk.
From an operator perspective, tariff-driven cost pressure has altered the calculus for new deployment versus retrofit. Airports and contractors are increasingly scrutinizing total cost of ownership, factoring in potential tariff volatility and lead-time uncertainty into procurement contracts. This environment has further encouraged multi-vendor approaches and contracting strategies that emphasize firm fixed pricing, staged payments tied to milestones, and clauses that allocate trade policy risk. In parallel, technology suppliers have responded by modularizing designs to allow sensitive subsystems to be produced domestically while retaining advanced imaging cores in centralized facilities, thereby managing tariff impacts while preserving performance and certification pathways.
Deep segmentation-driven insights revealing how technology types, passenger profiles, screening modalities, checkpoint contexts, deployment models, and buyer categories combine to determine solution design and procurement priorities
Segment-level nuances determine both product design decisions and operational choices across airports and service providers. Based on technology, the market encompasses AI video analytics, computed tomography, explosive trace detectors, metal detectors, millimeter wave scanners, and X-ray inspection systems, with computed tomography further differentiated into dual energy and single energy variants and the dual energy branch advancing into 3D imaging and material discrimination capabilities that change how threats are characterized and handled at checkpoints. These technology distinctions drive different requirements for data processing, physical footprint, and integration with automated screening lanes.
Based on passenger type, key user groups include business passengers, crew, leisure passengers, and transit passengers, each with distinct throughput profiles and tolerance for friction that influence screening lane design and staffing patterns. Based on screening type, the division between automated screening and manual screening shapes both capital planning and operational training; automated screening further divides into in line and off line implementations while manual screening requires procedures for bag search and physical pat down that remain essential for resolution of certain alerts. Based on checkpoint location, deployment contexts span arrival terminals, boarding gates, checked baggage areas, departure terminals, and security lounges, and each location imposes unique constraints on space, privacy, and throughput timing.
Based on deployment model, offerings are characterized as permanent or temporary with permanent solutions addressing new build and retrofit projects and temporary use cases covering event-based and seasonal needs, which guide design choices around mobility, installation time, and power provisioning. Finally, based on end user, buyers vary across airlines, airport authorities, private contractors, and security agencies, each bringing different procurement cycles, regulatory responsibilities, and maintenance expectations that influence lifecycle support models and service-level agreements. Understanding these segmentation layers enables more precise tailoring of product road maps, integration plans, and commercial models to align with operational realities.
Comprehensive regional intelligence on how the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets diverge in procurement priorities, regulatory expectations, and deployment preferences
Regional dynamics influence procurement timelines, regulatory compliance, and preferred system architectures in ways that require differentiated strategies. In the Americas, operators often prioritize high-throughput solutions that accommodate dense international hubs, and procurement choices reflect a balancing of cost pressures with demand for rapid passenger processing and integration with legacy infrastructure. North American airports typically emphasize cybersecurity certifications and interoperability with national agency workflows, while Latin American operators may lean toward modular systems that can be scaled incrementally during phased capital programs.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization and a diverse set of airport sizes lead to varied adoption patterns where high-capacity hubs invest in advanced imaging and biometrics and smaller facilities favor compact, cost-effective technologies. The region also places a premium on privacy-preserving data architectures and adherence to stringent cross-border data transfer rules. In Asia-Pacific, rapid passenger growth combined with substantial new airport builds and retrofit programs encourages early adoption of automated screening lanes, AI-enabled analytics, and integrated baggage and passenger processing solutions. Governments and airport authorities in the region often pursue aggressive modernization agendas that accelerate procurement cycles and create scale opportunities for vendors prepared to support localized deployment and maintenance capabilities.
Key competitive and strategic company-level observations highlighting the shift from standalone hardware suppliers to integrated solution providers and service-oriented business models
Companies operating within the screening ecosystem are evolving from product-centric suppliers to solutions-oriented partners that combine hardware, software, and managed services. Leading vendors differentiate through investments in advanced imaging research, AI-driven analytics, and open integration frameworks that simplify adoption by airports and contractors. Strategic partnerships between imaging specialists, software developers, and systems integrators increasingly determine success, with an emphasis on joint certification efforts and shared risk models for pilot deployments.
Service models have shifted to emphasize lifecycle maintenance, remote diagnostics, and subscription-based analytics that deliver continuous improvement and allow operators to extract more value over time. At the same time, competition from new entrants offering niche capabilities, such as high-performance algorithms for threat detection or compact portable screening units for temporary deployments, is prompting incumbents to accelerate innovation and pursue targeted acquisitions. Talent acquisition and retention remain critical differentiators, particularly for companies that can blend domain expertise in aviation security with modern software engineering, data science, and regulatory compliance capabilities.
Actionable, implementable recommendations for operators and vendors to adopt modularity, strengthen procurement resilience, and accelerate safe deployment of next-generation screening solutions
Industry leaders should adopt a proactive strategy that combines technology flexibility, procurement resilience, and rigorous operational validation. Prioritize modular architectures that allow incremental upgrades to imaging cores, analytics engines, and operator interfaces without requiring full replacement, thereby preserving capital while enabling rapid capability refresh. Simultaneously, embed cybersecurity and data privacy design principles from the outset to reduce downstream remediation costs and ensure compliance with evolving national and regional regulations.
Establish diversified supply chains and nearshoring options to lessen exposure to tariff volatility and component lead-time disruptions. Negotiate procurement contracts that include contingency provisions for trade policy changes and build pilot programs into procurement timelines to validate performance in live environments prior to wide-scale rollout. Invest in workforce training and change management to ensure that automated screening solutions translate into operational efficiency gains rather than bottlenecks. Finally, engage with standards bodies and regulatory stakeholders early in product development to help shape certification pathways and accelerate acceptance of innovative detection modalities.
A transparent and robust mixed-methods research approach blending primary stakeholder interviews, targeted surveys, and secondary validation to ensure rigorous and actionable findings
The research that underpins this analysis utilized a mixed-methods approach combining primary stakeholder engagement with rigorous secondary validation. Primary inputs included structured interviews with airport security directors, procurement leads, systems integrators, and device manufacturers to capture firsthand perspectives on operational priorities, procurement hurdles, and technology performance in live deployments. These qualitative insights were complemented by targeted surveys designed to elicit detailed information on checkpoint configurations, throughput expectations, and maintenance practices.
Secondary research involved systematic review of technical standards, regulatory guidance documents, patent filings, and public procurement records to cross-check vendor claims and identify emerging capability trends. Data was triangulated across multiple sources to ensure consistency and reduce bias, and analytical techniques included scenario modeling to examine the effects of tariff changes, supply chain disruptions, and technology adoption curves. Quality assurance processes included senior peer review, reproducibility checks for data aggregation, and validation workshops with representative operator stakeholders to confirm the practical relevance of findings and recommendations.
A concise conclusion underscoring the need for integrated, modular, and operationally validated screening strategies to reconcile security effectiveness with passenger throughput expectations
Modern airport passenger screening demands an approach that harmonizes detection performance, passenger experience, and operational resilience. Advances in computed tomography, artificial intelligence, and automated screening architectures create opportunities to reduce manual interventions, improve throughput, and enhance threat resolution accuracy when deployed thoughtfully. Yet these benefits materialize only when technology choices align with checkpoint constraints, workforce capabilities, and broader regulatory obligations.
Organizations that succeed will combine modular technical architectures with pragmatic procurement and contracting strategies that mitigate trade policy and supply chain risks. Equally important is investment in human capital and operational testing to ensure that new systems deliver real-world improvements. By embracing integrated solutions, engaging proactively with regulators, and planning for flexible deployment models, airports, airlines, contractors, and agencies can sustainably strengthen security posture while meeting rising expectations for speed and passenger convenience.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise and authoritative introduction explaining how technological integration, operational demands, and passenger expectations are reshaping airport screening strategies
The airport passenger screening environment stands at an inflection point where technological advancement, evolving threat profiles, and heightened passenger expectations converge. Screening systems have moved beyond singular hardware platforms to integrated solutions that blend imaging, detection, analytics, and operational orchestration. This evolution has necessitated a rethinking of procurement, operations, and regulatory compliance frameworks across airports, airlines, private contractors, and government agencies.
Stakeholders now prioritize end-to-end workflows that reduce throughput friction while preserving or enhancing detection performance. The introduction of advanced imaging modalities and intelligent software has shifted emphasis toward systems that can seamlessly process high volumes of passengers and baggage with minimal manual intervention. As a result, decision-makers are evaluating how new technologies integrate with existing checkpoint footprints, staffing models, and passenger experience initiatives, while balancing lifecycle costs and long-term resilience.
An incisive analysis of the major technological and operational shifts redefining detection performance, automation, and checkpoint workflows across modern airports
The landscape for passenger screening is undergoing transformative shifts driven by both technological innovation and operational imperatives. Artificial intelligence and machine learning now underpin rapid image triage and anomaly detection, enabling screening systems to surface higher-confidence alerts while reducing false positives. At the same time, computed tomography has matured from dual-energy scanning into sophisticated 3D imaging with material discrimination capabilities that materially improve threat characterization and reduce unnecessary manual bag checks.
Concurrently, growth in biometric identification and automated passenger processing has prompted a reconfiguration of checkpoint flows, enabling touchless interactions that enhance speed without compromising security. This movement toward automation pairs with a renewed focus on cybersecurity, as networked screening assets introduce additional attack surfaces. In addition, supply chain volatility and regulatory updates compel operators to favor modular, upgradeable architectures that allow incremental capability additions. Taken together, these shifts encourage operators to adopt a systems-level perspective that harmonizes hardware, software, and human processes for safer and more efficient screening outcomes.
A thorough examination of how evolving U.S. tariff measures through 2025 are reshaping procurement strategies, supplier localization, and contract risk allocation across the screening ecosystem
U.S. tariff adjustments through 2025 have created material procurement and supply chain implications for producers and operators of screening equipment. Tariff measures affecting certain electronic components and finished devices have increased landed costs for some imported hardware, prompting vendors to reassess sourcing strategies, reprice offerings, and adjust delivery timelines. These dynamics have also accelerated supplier efforts to localize assembly and establish alternative component suppliers to mitigate duty exposure and inventory risk.
From an operator perspective, tariff-driven cost pressure has altered the calculus for new deployment versus retrofit. Airports and contractors are increasingly scrutinizing total cost of ownership, factoring in potential tariff volatility and lead-time uncertainty into procurement contracts. This environment has further encouraged multi-vendor approaches and contracting strategies that emphasize firm fixed pricing, staged payments tied to milestones, and clauses that allocate trade policy risk. In parallel, technology suppliers have responded by modularizing designs to allow sensitive subsystems to be produced domestically while retaining advanced imaging cores in centralized facilities, thereby managing tariff impacts while preserving performance and certification pathways.
Deep segmentation-driven insights revealing how technology types, passenger profiles, screening modalities, checkpoint contexts, deployment models, and buyer categories combine to determine solution design and procurement priorities
Segment-level nuances determine both product design decisions and operational choices across airports and service providers. Based on technology, the market encompasses AI video analytics, computed tomography, explosive trace detectors, metal detectors, millimeter wave scanners, and X-ray inspection systems, with computed tomography further differentiated into dual energy and single energy variants and the dual energy branch advancing into 3D imaging and material discrimination capabilities that change how threats are characterized and handled at checkpoints. These technology distinctions drive different requirements for data processing, physical footprint, and integration with automated screening lanes.
Based on passenger type, key user groups include business passengers, crew, leisure passengers, and transit passengers, each with distinct throughput profiles and tolerance for friction that influence screening lane design and staffing patterns. Based on screening type, the division between automated screening and manual screening shapes both capital planning and operational training; automated screening further divides into in line and off line implementations while manual screening requires procedures for bag search and physical pat down that remain essential for resolution of certain alerts. Based on checkpoint location, deployment contexts span arrival terminals, boarding gates, checked baggage areas, departure terminals, and security lounges, and each location imposes unique constraints on space, privacy, and throughput timing.
Based on deployment model, offerings are characterized as permanent or temporary with permanent solutions addressing new build and retrofit projects and temporary use cases covering event-based and seasonal needs, which guide design choices around mobility, installation time, and power provisioning. Finally, based on end user, buyers vary across airlines, airport authorities, private contractors, and security agencies, each bringing different procurement cycles, regulatory responsibilities, and maintenance expectations that influence lifecycle support models and service-level agreements. Understanding these segmentation layers enables more precise tailoring of product road maps, integration plans, and commercial models to align with operational realities.
Comprehensive regional intelligence on how the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets diverge in procurement priorities, regulatory expectations, and deployment preferences
Regional dynamics influence procurement timelines, regulatory compliance, and preferred system architectures in ways that require differentiated strategies. In the Americas, operators often prioritize high-throughput solutions that accommodate dense international hubs, and procurement choices reflect a balancing of cost pressures with demand for rapid passenger processing and integration with legacy infrastructure. North American airports typically emphasize cybersecurity certifications and interoperability with national agency workflows, while Latin American operators may lean toward modular systems that can be scaled incrementally during phased capital programs.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization and a diverse set of airport sizes lead to varied adoption patterns where high-capacity hubs invest in advanced imaging and biometrics and smaller facilities favor compact, cost-effective technologies. The region also places a premium on privacy-preserving data architectures and adherence to stringent cross-border data transfer rules. In Asia-Pacific, rapid passenger growth combined with substantial new airport builds and retrofit programs encourages early adoption of automated screening lanes, AI-enabled analytics, and integrated baggage and passenger processing solutions. Governments and airport authorities in the region often pursue aggressive modernization agendas that accelerate procurement cycles and create scale opportunities for vendors prepared to support localized deployment and maintenance capabilities.
Key competitive and strategic company-level observations highlighting the shift from standalone hardware suppliers to integrated solution providers and service-oriented business models
Companies operating within the screening ecosystem are evolving from product-centric suppliers to solutions-oriented partners that combine hardware, software, and managed services. Leading vendors differentiate through investments in advanced imaging research, AI-driven analytics, and open integration frameworks that simplify adoption by airports and contractors. Strategic partnerships between imaging specialists, software developers, and systems integrators increasingly determine success, with an emphasis on joint certification efforts and shared risk models for pilot deployments.
Service models have shifted to emphasize lifecycle maintenance, remote diagnostics, and subscription-based analytics that deliver continuous improvement and allow operators to extract more value over time. At the same time, competition from new entrants offering niche capabilities, such as high-performance algorithms for threat detection or compact portable screening units for temporary deployments, is prompting incumbents to accelerate innovation and pursue targeted acquisitions. Talent acquisition and retention remain critical differentiators, particularly for companies that can blend domain expertise in aviation security with modern software engineering, data science, and regulatory compliance capabilities.
Actionable, implementable recommendations for operators and vendors to adopt modularity, strengthen procurement resilience, and accelerate safe deployment of next-generation screening solutions
Industry leaders should adopt a proactive strategy that combines technology flexibility, procurement resilience, and rigorous operational validation. Prioritize modular architectures that allow incremental upgrades to imaging cores, analytics engines, and operator interfaces without requiring full replacement, thereby preserving capital while enabling rapid capability refresh. Simultaneously, embed cybersecurity and data privacy design principles from the outset to reduce downstream remediation costs and ensure compliance with evolving national and regional regulations.
Establish diversified supply chains and nearshoring options to lessen exposure to tariff volatility and component lead-time disruptions. Negotiate procurement contracts that include contingency provisions for trade policy changes and build pilot programs into procurement timelines to validate performance in live environments prior to wide-scale rollout. Invest in workforce training and change management to ensure that automated screening solutions translate into operational efficiency gains rather than bottlenecks. Finally, engage with standards bodies and regulatory stakeholders early in product development to help shape certification pathways and accelerate acceptance of innovative detection modalities.
A transparent and robust mixed-methods research approach blending primary stakeholder interviews, targeted surveys, and secondary validation to ensure rigorous and actionable findings
The research that underpins this analysis utilized a mixed-methods approach combining primary stakeholder engagement with rigorous secondary validation. Primary inputs included structured interviews with airport security directors, procurement leads, systems integrators, and device manufacturers to capture firsthand perspectives on operational priorities, procurement hurdles, and technology performance in live deployments. These qualitative insights were complemented by targeted surveys designed to elicit detailed information on checkpoint configurations, throughput expectations, and maintenance practices.
Secondary research involved systematic review of technical standards, regulatory guidance documents, patent filings, and public procurement records to cross-check vendor claims and identify emerging capability trends. Data was triangulated across multiple sources to ensure consistency and reduce bias, and analytical techniques included scenario modeling to examine the effects of tariff changes, supply chain disruptions, and technology adoption curves. Quality assurance processes included senior peer review, reproducibility checks for data aggregation, and validation workshops with representative operator stakeholders to confirm the practical relevance of findings and recommendations.
A concise conclusion underscoring the need for integrated, modular, and operationally validated screening strategies to reconcile security effectiveness with passenger throughput expectations
Modern airport passenger screening demands an approach that harmonizes detection performance, passenger experience, and operational resilience. Advances in computed tomography, artificial intelligence, and automated screening architectures create opportunities to reduce manual interventions, improve throughput, and enhance threat resolution accuracy when deployed thoughtfully. Yet these benefits materialize only when technology choices align with checkpoint constraints, workforce capabilities, and broader regulatory obligations.
Organizations that succeed will combine modular technical architectures with pragmatic procurement and contracting strategies that mitigate trade policy and supply chain risks. Equally important is investment in human capital and operational testing to ensure that new systems deliver real-world improvements. By embracing integrated solutions, engaging proactively with regulators, and planning for flexible deployment models, airports, airlines, contractors, and agencies can sustainably strengthen security posture while meeting rising expectations for speed and passenger convenience.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Deployment of computed tomography cabin baggage scanners enabling 3D threat detection and automated clearances
- 5.2. Adoption of facial recognition biometric kiosks integrated with watchlist screening for seamless passenger flow
- 5.3. Implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms for behavior analysis to flag high risk passengers in real time
- 5.4. Integration of millimeter wave body scanners with automated threat recognition to reduce manual pat downs
- 5.5. Shift towards touchless security checkpoints using biometric authentication and contactless travel documents
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Airport Passenger Screening System Market, by Technology
- 8.1. AI Video Analytics
- 8.2. Computed Tomography
- 8.2.1. Dual Energy
- 8.2.1.1. 3D Imaging
- 8.2.1.2. Material Discrimination
- 8.2.2. Single Energy
- 8.3. Explosive Trace Detector
- 8.4. Metal Detector
- 8.5. Millimeter Wave Scanner
- 8.6. X Ray Inspection System
- 9. Airport Passenger Screening System Market, by Passenger Type
- 9.1. Business Passenger
- 9.2. Crew
- 9.3. Leisure Passenger
- 9.4. Transit Passenger
- 10. Airport Passenger Screening System Market, by Screening Type
- 10.1. Automated Screening
- 10.1.1. In Line
- 10.1.2. Off Line
- 10.2. Manual Screening
- 10.2.1. Bag Search
- 10.2.2. Physical Pat Down
- 11. Airport Passenger Screening System Market, by Checkpoint Location
- 11.1. Arrival Terminal
- 11.2. Boarding Gate
- 11.3. Checked Baggage Area
- 11.4. Departure Terminal
- 11.5. Security Lounge
- 12. Airport Passenger Screening System Market, by Deployment Model
- 12.1. Permanent
- 12.1.1. New Build
- 12.1.2. Retrofit
- 12.2. Temporary
- 12.2.1. Event Based
- 12.2.2. Seasonal
- 13. Airport Passenger Screening System Market, by End User
- 13.1. Airline
- 13.2. Airport Authority
- 13.3. Private Contractor
- 13.4. Security Agency
- 14. Airport Passenger Screening System Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Airport Passenger Screening System Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Airport Passenger Screening System Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Analogic Corporation
- 17.3.2. Astrophysics Inc
- 17.3.3. Autoclear LLC
- 17.3.4. Bosch Ltd
- 17.3.5. Bruker Corporation
- 17.3.6. C.E.I.A. S.p.A
- 17.3.7. Garrett Electronics Inc
- 17.3.8. Honeywell International Inc
- 17.3.9. IDEMIA
- 17.3.10. L3Harris Technologies
- 17.3.11. Leidos Inc
- 17.3.12. Leonardo S.p.A
- 17.3.13. NEC Corporation
- 17.3.14. Nuctech Company Limited
- 17.3.15. Optosecurity Inc
- 17.3.16. OSI Systems Inc (which includes the Rapiscan Systems brand)
- 17.3.17. Panasonic Corporation
- 17.3.18. QinetiQ Group plc
- 17.3.19. Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
- 17.3.20. Safran Identity & Security
- 17.3.21. SITA
- 17.3.22. Smiths Group plc
- 17.3.23. Tek84 Inc
- 17.3.24. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
- 17.3.25. Thales Group
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
