Airport Baggage Screening Systems Market by Technology Type (Bulk Explosives Detection Systems, Computed Tomography Systems, Explosive Trace Detection Systems), Application (Cargo Screening, Carry-On Baggage Screening, Hold Baggage Screening), End User, S
Description
The Airport Baggage Screening Systems Market was valued at USD 3.20 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 3.42 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.94%, reaching USD 5.48 billion by 2032.
An authoritative overview framing how evolving detection technologies and operational priorities are reshaping airport baggage screening strategies
The airport baggage screening landscape is undergoing a period of accelerated technological refinement and operational recalibration. Security leaders, airport operators, and equipment suppliers are navigating increased expectations for threat detection fidelity, throughput efficiency, and passenger experience continuity. Developments in imaging, trace detection, and machine learning-enabled analytics are converging with pragmatic demands for maintainability, regulatory compliance, and minimized false alarms. As a result, decision-makers must reconcile short-term screening capacity needs with longer-term investments that enable adaptive upgrades and modular deployments.
Across the sector, there is a clear shift from single-point, isolated screening solutions toward integrated ecosystems that combine hardware, software, and services. Vendors are expanding their portfolios to include lifecycle support, remote diagnostics, and training programs designed to maximize equipment availability. Meanwhile, airports are re-evaluating terminal layouts, queue management, and staffing models to capture the efficiency gains promised by newer screening technologies. Consequently, procurement strategies are evolving to prioritize vendors who can demonstrate end-to-end operational benefits and measurable improvements in detection performance and passenger throughput.
How emerging imaging, multisensor integration, and operations-focused innovation are fundamentally altering baggage screening workflows and performance expectations
Transformative shifts in the landscape are being driven by advances in imaging resolution, algorithmic threat recognition, and the blending of multiple sensing modalities to reduce operator burden. Computed tomography systems are maturing beyond their initial adoption, enabling automated threat identification that reduces manual image interpretation. Explosive trace detection methods are also becoming more nuanced with air-based sampling systems complementing traditional swab-based approaches to improve sampling coverage and reduce processing time. These technological shifts are accompanied by increasing attention to system interoperability, allowing different screening platforms to share detections and operator workflows more seamlessly.
Operationally, airports and security providers are embracing data-driven decision-making to optimize lane configurations, staffing allocations, and maintenance schedules. The expansion of remote monitoring and predictive maintenance capabilities is helping operators increase equipment uptime and reduce lifecycle costs. In parallel, user experience priorities are encouraging designs that minimize intrusive screening processes while maintaining high detection performance. Regulatory developments are prompting standardized testing and certification pathways that seek to balance innovation with consistent security outcomes, reinforcing the importance of validated performance metrics and transparent vendor claims.
Practical implications of the 2025 tariff environment on procurement resilience, supplier sourcing strategies, and lifecycle cost management for screening systems
The cumulative impact of United States tariffs announced for 2025 has introduced a new set of considerations for procurement, supply chain continuity, and total cost of ownership for baggage screening systems. Equipment manufacturers and channel partners have had to reassess sourcing strategies, component localization, and contract terms to mitigate exposure to tariff-related cost pressures. Procurement teams are increasingly focused on contractual flexibility, including options for alternative sourcing and clarified warranty obligations that account for potential price volatility. These dynamics have also encouraged some vendors to diversify manufacturing footprints and to negotiate supplier agreements that dampen the immediate pass-through of tariff costs.
In addition to supplier-side adjustments, airports and service providers are recalibrating capital planning timelines to accommodate potential lead-time variability and to validate the stability of long-term maintenance and spare-parts availability. The tariff environment has also elevated the importance of lifecycle service arrangements that bundle hardware, software, and support to provide predictable operating budgets. Finally, compliance with procurement regulations and public procurement scrutiny has intensified, prompting greater transparency around cost breakouts and the operational rationale for technology investments. As a result, stakeholders are placing greater weight on supplier resilience and supply chain risk disclosures when evaluating significant screening investments.
Insightful segmentation analysis connecting technology modalities, application contexts, user types, and service offerings to procurement and operational choices
Key segmentation insights reveal how distinct technology classes, applications, end users, and service modalities shape decision frameworks across the ecosystem. Based on Technology Type, the market is studied across Bulk Explosives Detection Systems, Computed Tomography Systems, Explosive Trace Detection Systems, Magnetic Detection Systems, and X-Ray Screening Systems, with Computed Tomography Systems further studied across Dual-Energy CT Systems and Single-Energy CT Systems, and Explosive Trace Detection Systems further studied across Air-Based Systems and Swab-Based Systems, which highlights the importance of modality-specific performance characteristics and upgrade pathways. These technology distinctions influence procurement criteria, where CT systems are often prioritized for automated threat recognition, trace detection solutions are selected to complement imaging gaps, and magnetic or bulk detection systems are retained for targeted screening scenarios.
Based on Application, the market is studied across Cargo Screening, Carry-On Baggage Screening, and Hold Baggage Screening, and each application exhibits unique throughput constraints, regulatory requirements, and physical integration challenges. Cargo operations necessitate scalable solutions capable of handling diverse packaging formats, while carry-on lanes prioritize speed and minimal passenger disruption, and hold baggage screening must reconcile high-volume, conveyor-based processing with downstream baggage handling systems. Based on End User, the market is studied across Airlines, Airport Operators, Government Agencies & Security Organizations, and Privately Owned Screening Companies, which underscores that procurement motivations vary from regulatory compliance and national security imperatives to commercial efficiency and cost management. Based on Service Type, the market is studied across Hardware, Maintenance & Support, Software, and Training & Consulting, emphasizing that service bundles and aftermarket support are increasingly decisive in long-term supplier selection and operational reliability.
Regional contrasts that reveal how regulatory demands, capacity growth, and operational priorities drive distinct screening technology and service preferences across global markets
Key regional insights emphasize the geographic variability in technology adoption cycles, regulatory drivers, and operational priorities across major global markets. In the Americas, adoption patterns reflect a balance between legacy infrastructure modernization and investments in high-throughput automated screening; operators tend to favor solutions that can be scaled incrementally while preserving continuity of service. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa demonstrates a wide divergence of needs: some hubs are deploying the latest computed tomography and trace detection integrations to meet rigorous regulatory standards, while other markets prioritize cost-effective modular upgrades and extended maintenance partnerships to stretch capital budgets.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid terminal expansion and a focus on passenger throughput, where advanced imaging technologies and integrated operational analytics are being used to optimize lane performance and reduce dwell times. Across all regions, interoperability and supplier ecosystems remain pivotal, but the emphasis shifts from regulatory harmonization in Europe to capacity-driven investments in Asia-Pacific and resilience-focused procurement approaches in the Americas. Regional differences also influence workforce development priorities, with some markets investing heavily in operator training and others relying more on automation to manage labor constraints.
Competitive dynamics and supplier strategies highlighting how integrated portfolios and service-led differentiation determine procurement preference and long-term value
Key companies insights focus on capability differentiation, portfolio breadth, and the strategic role of services in competitive positioning. Leading vendors are increasingly presenting end-to-end value propositions that bundle advanced hardware, analytics-enabled software, and responsive maintenance offerings to reduce the burden on airport operations. Strategic partnerships, acquisitions, and targeted R&D investments are common approaches for companies seeking to validate their technology stacks and expand into adjacent service verticals, with an emphasis on demonstrable reductions in false alarm rates and improved machine-assisted detection throughput.
Smaller and niche suppliers continue to play a meaningful role by offering specialized solutions, such as focused trace detection systems or magnetic screening for unique cargo needs, which can be integrated with larger ecosystem players. Companies that prioritize open architectures and standards-based interfaces tend to find greater acceptance among large airport operators that require multi-vendor environments. Additionally, firms that invest in robust training, remote diagnostics, and predictive maintenance services are gaining competitive advantage by offering lower total disruption over equipment lifecycles. Overall, corporate strategies are aligning around modular innovation, operational transparency, and service reliability to win long-term contracts and to support pilot deployments.
Practical strategic and operational recommendations to help procurement, operations, and security leaders optimize technology selection and resilience planning
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders emphasize pragmatic steps to balance innovation, resilience, and cost-effective operations. Leaders should prioritize investments in interoperable systems that allow phased technology rollouts and minimize vendor lock-in, while simultaneously establishing performance-based procurement criteria that weigh detection accuracy, throughput impact, and lifecycle service capabilities. In parallel, organizations should develop robust supply chain contingency plans that account for tariff-related variability, component shortages, and logistics disruptions, ensuring that contractual terms include clear provisions for spares provisioning and lead-time guarantees.
From an operational perspective, airports and screening service providers should adopt a structured approach to workforce development that blends operator training with incremental automation to preserve institutional knowledge while leveraging algorithmic decision support. Stakeholders are advised to pilot multisensor integration projects that combine computed tomography, trace detection, and complementary modalities in controlled environments to quantify real-world performance gains and to refine standard operating procedures. Finally, procurement teams should insist on transparent performance validations and independent test results to compare vendor claims objectively and to support defensible investment decisions under public scrutiny.
A transparent, multi-method research approach combining primary stakeholder engagement and secondary technical validation to underpin credible industry insights
The research methodology balances primary and secondary data collection with rigorous validation and expert consultation to ensure the integrity and applicability of insights. Primary inputs included structured interviews with screening technology vendors, airport operators, and security specialists to capture firsthand perspectives on operational challenges, procurement drivers, and technology performance. These conversations were supplemented by technical briefings and demonstrations to observe solution behavior under representative conditions and to capture supplier roadmaps and service commitments.
Secondary research encompassed regulatory publications, standards documents, industry white papers, and peer-reviewed technical literature to corroborate performance claims and to contextualize technology trajectories. Data synthesis employed cross-validation techniques to reconcile divergent viewpoints and to identify consensus perspectives on technology adoption barriers and enablers. The methodology prioritized transparency in assumptions, documented source provenance for qualitative assertions, and incorporated scenario-based sensitivity checks for strategic implications, thereby enabling readers to understand the basis for recommendations and to adapt findings to their specific operational contexts.
A conclusive perspective on how integrated technology adoption, resilient procurement, and service excellence will shape future baggage screening effectiveness and operations
In conclusion, the airport baggage screening sector stands at an inflection point where technology advancements, operational imperatives, and external pressures are intersecting to redefine security workflows and procurement calculus. The combined effects of improved imaging, enhanced trace detection modalities, and evolving service models are enabling more automated, reliable, and user-centric screening operations. While tariff-driven supply chain dynamics and regional variability introduce complexity, they also prompt strategic supplier selection and more resilient procurement practices that can ultimately strengthen operational continuity.
Decision-makers who integrate interoperable technologies, insist on validated performance metrics, and build disciplined maintenance and training programs will be better positioned to realize the operational benefits of newer screening solutions. By aligning investments with clearly articulated performance outcomes and by engaging in transparent vendor negotiations, airports and screening providers can balance security objectives with passenger experience and cost considerations. The current environment rewards pragmatic innovation, and stakeholders who pursue measured pilots, emphasize service continuity, and demand supplier transparency are likely to capture the most durable value from their technology investments.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative overview framing how evolving detection technologies and operational priorities are reshaping airport baggage screening strategies
The airport baggage screening landscape is undergoing a period of accelerated technological refinement and operational recalibration. Security leaders, airport operators, and equipment suppliers are navigating increased expectations for threat detection fidelity, throughput efficiency, and passenger experience continuity. Developments in imaging, trace detection, and machine learning-enabled analytics are converging with pragmatic demands for maintainability, regulatory compliance, and minimized false alarms. As a result, decision-makers must reconcile short-term screening capacity needs with longer-term investments that enable adaptive upgrades and modular deployments.
Across the sector, there is a clear shift from single-point, isolated screening solutions toward integrated ecosystems that combine hardware, software, and services. Vendors are expanding their portfolios to include lifecycle support, remote diagnostics, and training programs designed to maximize equipment availability. Meanwhile, airports are re-evaluating terminal layouts, queue management, and staffing models to capture the efficiency gains promised by newer screening technologies. Consequently, procurement strategies are evolving to prioritize vendors who can demonstrate end-to-end operational benefits and measurable improvements in detection performance and passenger throughput.
How emerging imaging, multisensor integration, and operations-focused innovation are fundamentally altering baggage screening workflows and performance expectations
Transformative shifts in the landscape are being driven by advances in imaging resolution, algorithmic threat recognition, and the blending of multiple sensing modalities to reduce operator burden. Computed tomography systems are maturing beyond their initial adoption, enabling automated threat identification that reduces manual image interpretation. Explosive trace detection methods are also becoming more nuanced with air-based sampling systems complementing traditional swab-based approaches to improve sampling coverage and reduce processing time. These technological shifts are accompanied by increasing attention to system interoperability, allowing different screening platforms to share detections and operator workflows more seamlessly.
Operationally, airports and security providers are embracing data-driven decision-making to optimize lane configurations, staffing allocations, and maintenance schedules. The expansion of remote monitoring and predictive maintenance capabilities is helping operators increase equipment uptime and reduce lifecycle costs. In parallel, user experience priorities are encouraging designs that minimize intrusive screening processes while maintaining high detection performance. Regulatory developments are prompting standardized testing and certification pathways that seek to balance innovation with consistent security outcomes, reinforcing the importance of validated performance metrics and transparent vendor claims.
Practical implications of the 2025 tariff environment on procurement resilience, supplier sourcing strategies, and lifecycle cost management for screening systems
The cumulative impact of United States tariffs announced for 2025 has introduced a new set of considerations for procurement, supply chain continuity, and total cost of ownership for baggage screening systems. Equipment manufacturers and channel partners have had to reassess sourcing strategies, component localization, and contract terms to mitigate exposure to tariff-related cost pressures. Procurement teams are increasingly focused on contractual flexibility, including options for alternative sourcing and clarified warranty obligations that account for potential price volatility. These dynamics have also encouraged some vendors to diversify manufacturing footprints and to negotiate supplier agreements that dampen the immediate pass-through of tariff costs.
In addition to supplier-side adjustments, airports and service providers are recalibrating capital planning timelines to accommodate potential lead-time variability and to validate the stability of long-term maintenance and spare-parts availability. The tariff environment has also elevated the importance of lifecycle service arrangements that bundle hardware, software, and support to provide predictable operating budgets. Finally, compliance with procurement regulations and public procurement scrutiny has intensified, prompting greater transparency around cost breakouts and the operational rationale for technology investments. As a result, stakeholders are placing greater weight on supplier resilience and supply chain risk disclosures when evaluating significant screening investments.
Insightful segmentation analysis connecting technology modalities, application contexts, user types, and service offerings to procurement and operational choices
Key segmentation insights reveal how distinct technology classes, applications, end users, and service modalities shape decision frameworks across the ecosystem. Based on Technology Type, the market is studied across Bulk Explosives Detection Systems, Computed Tomography Systems, Explosive Trace Detection Systems, Magnetic Detection Systems, and X-Ray Screening Systems, with Computed Tomography Systems further studied across Dual-Energy CT Systems and Single-Energy CT Systems, and Explosive Trace Detection Systems further studied across Air-Based Systems and Swab-Based Systems, which highlights the importance of modality-specific performance characteristics and upgrade pathways. These technology distinctions influence procurement criteria, where CT systems are often prioritized for automated threat recognition, trace detection solutions are selected to complement imaging gaps, and magnetic or bulk detection systems are retained for targeted screening scenarios.
Based on Application, the market is studied across Cargo Screening, Carry-On Baggage Screening, and Hold Baggage Screening, and each application exhibits unique throughput constraints, regulatory requirements, and physical integration challenges. Cargo operations necessitate scalable solutions capable of handling diverse packaging formats, while carry-on lanes prioritize speed and minimal passenger disruption, and hold baggage screening must reconcile high-volume, conveyor-based processing with downstream baggage handling systems. Based on End User, the market is studied across Airlines, Airport Operators, Government Agencies & Security Organizations, and Privately Owned Screening Companies, which underscores that procurement motivations vary from regulatory compliance and national security imperatives to commercial efficiency and cost management. Based on Service Type, the market is studied across Hardware, Maintenance & Support, Software, and Training & Consulting, emphasizing that service bundles and aftermarket support are increasingly decisive in long-term supplier selection and operational reliability.
Regional contrasts that reveal how regulatory demands, capacity growth, and operational priorities drive distinct screening technology and service preferences across global markets
Key regional insights emphasize the geographic variability in technology adoption cycles, regulatory drivers, and operational priorities across major global markets. In the Americas, adoption patterns reflect a balance between legacy infrastructure modernization and investments in high-throughput automated screening; operators tend to favor solutions that can be scaled incrementally while preserving continuity of service. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa demonstrates a wide divergence of needs: some hubs are deploying the latest computed tomography and trace detection integrations to meet rigorous regulatory standards, while other markets prioritize cost-effective modular upgrades and extended maintenance partnerships to stretch capital budgets.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid terminal expansion and a focus on passenger throughput, where advanced imaging technologies and integrated operational analytics are being used to optimize lane performance and reduce dwell times. Across all regions, interoperability and supplier ecosystems remain pivotal, but the emphasis shifts from regulatory harmonization in Europe to capacity-driven investments in Asia-Pacific and resilience-focused procurement approaches in the Americas. Regional differences also influence workforce development priorities, with some markets investing heavily in operator training and others relying more on automation to manage labor constraints.
Competitive dynamics and supplier strategies highlighting how integrated portfolios and service-led differentiation determine procurement preference and long-term value
Key companies insights focus on capability differentiation, portfolio breadth, and the strategic role of services in competitive positioning. Leading vendors are increasingly presenting end-to-end value propositions that bundle advanced hardware, analytics-enabled software, and responsive maintenance offerings to reduce the burden on airport operations. Strategic partnerships, acquisitions, and targeted R&D investments are common approaches for companies seeking to validate their technology stacks and expand into adjacent service verticals, with an emphasis on demonstrable reductions in false alarm rates and improved machine-assisted detection throughput.
Smaller and niche suppliers continue to play a meaningful role by offering specialized solutions, such as focused trace detection systems or magnetic screening for unique cargo needs, which can be integrated with larger ecosystem players. Companies that prioritize open architectures and standards-based interfaces tend to find greater acceptance among large airport operators that require multi-vendor environments. Additionally, firms that invest in robust training, remote diagnostics, and predictive maintenance services are gaining competitive advantage by offering lower total disruption over equipment lifecycles. Overall, corporate strategies are aligning around modular innovation, operational transparency, and service reliability to win long-term contracts and to support pilot deployments.
Practical strategic and operational recommendations to help procurement, operations, and security leaders optimize technology selection and resilience planning
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders emphasize pragmatic steps to balance innovation, resilience, and cost-effective operations. Leaders should prioritize investments in interoperable systems that allow phased technology rollouts and minimize vendor lock-in, while simultaneously establishing performance-based procurement criteria that weigh detection accuracy, throughput impact, and lifecycle service capabilities. In parallel, organizations should develop robust supply chain contingency plans that account for tariff-related variability, component shortages, and logistics disruptions, ensuring that contractual terms include clear provisions for spares provisioning and lead-time guarantees.
From an operational perspective, airports and screening service providers should adopt a structured approach to workforce development that blends operator training with incremental automation to preserve institutional knowledge while leveraging algorithmic decision support. Stakeholders are advised to pilot multisensor integration projects that combine computed tomography, trace detection, and complementary modalities in controlled environments to quantify real-world performance gains and to refine standard operating procedures. Finally, procurement teams should insist on transparent performance validations and independent test results to compare vendor claims objectively and to support defensible investment decisions under public scrutiny.
A transparent, multi-method research approach combining primary stakeholder engagement and secondary technical validation to underpin credible industry insights
The research methodology balances primary and secondary data collection with rigorous validation and expert consultation to ensure the integrity and applicability of insights. Primary inputs included structured interviews with screening technology vendors, airport operators, and security specialists to capture firsthand perspectives on operational challenges, procurement drivers, and technology performance. These conversations were supplemented by technical briefings and demonstrations to observe solution behavior under representative conditions and to capture supplier roadmaps and service commitments.
Secondary research encompassed regulatory publications, standards documents, industry white papers, and peer-reviewed technical literature to corroborate performance claims and to contextualize technology trajectories. Data synthesis employed cross-validation techniques to reconcile divergent viewpoints and to identify consensus perspectives on technology adoption barriers and enablers. The methodology prioritized transparency in assumptions, documented source provenance for qualitative assertions, and incorporated scenario-based sensitivity checks for strategic implications, thereby enabling readers to understand the basis for recommendations and to adapt findings to their specific operational contexts.
A conclusive perspective on how integrated technology adoption, resilient procurement, and service excellence will shape future baggage screening effectiveness and operations
In conclusion, the airport baggage screening sector stands at an inflection point where technology advancements, operational imperatives, and external pressures are intersecting to redefine security workflows and procurement calculus. The combined effects of improved imaging, enhanced trace detection modalities, and evolving service models are enabling more automated, reliable, and user-centric screening operations. While tariff-driven supply chain dynamics and regional variability introduce complexity, they also prompt strategic supplier selection and more resilient procurement practices that can ultimately strengthen operational continuity.
Decision-makers who integrate interoperable technologies, insist on validated performance metrics, and build disciplined maintenance and training programs will be better positioned to realize the operational benefits of newer screening solutions. By aligning investments with clearly articulated performance outcomes and by engaging in transparent vendor negotiations, airports and screening providers can balance security objectives with passenger experience and cost considerations. The current environment rewards pragmatic innovation, and stakeholders who pursue measured pilots, emphasize service continuity, and demand supplier transparency are likely to capture the most durable value from their technology investments.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence algorithms for automated threat detection in baggage screening systems
- 5.2. Deployment of next-generation computed tomography scanners for enhanced 3D baggage imaging resolution
- 5.3. Adoption of remote screening architectures driven by centralized processing to optimize staffing efficiency
- 5.4. Implementation of explosive trace detection technologies with improved sensitivity and real-time reporting capabilities
- 5.5. Expansion of dual-energy X-ray systems to differentiate organic and inorganic threat materials in checked luggage
- 5.6. Introduction of contactless baggage screening processes to minimize passenger-staff interaction and speed throughput
- 5.7. Development of energy-efficient baggage screening equipment to achieve sustainability targets at major international airports
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Airport Baggage Screening Systems Market, by Technology Type
- 8.1. Bulk Explosives Detection Systems
- 8.2. Computed Tomography Systems
- 8.2.1. Dual-Energy CT Systems
- 8.2.2. Single-Energy CT Systems
- 8.3. Explosive Trace Detection Systems
- 8.3.1. Air-Based Systems
- 8.3.2. Swab-Based Systems
- 8.4. Magnetic Detection Systems
- 8.5. X-Ray Screening Systems
- 9. Airport Baggage Screening Systems Market, by Application
- 9.1. Cargo Screening
- 9.2. Carry-On Baggage Screening
- 9.3. Hold Baggage Screening
- 10. Airport Baggage Screening Systems Market, by End User
- 10.1. Airlines
- 10.2. Airport Operators
- 10.3. Government Agencies & Security Organizations
- 10.4. Privately Owned Screening Companies
- 11. Airport Baggage Screening Systems Market, by Service Type
- 11.1. Hardware
- 11.2. Maintenance & Support
- 11.3. Software
- 11.4. Training & Consulting
- 12. Airport Baggage Screening Systems Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Airport Baggage Screening Systems Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Airport Baggage Screening Systems Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. ADANI Limited
- 15.3.2. American Science and Engineering, Inc.
- 15.3.3. Analogic Corporation
- 15.3.4. Astrophysics, Inc.
- 15.3.5. Autoclear, LLC
- 15.3.6. CEIA S.p.A.
- 15.3.7. Detection Technologies Ltd.
- 15.3.8. Garrett Electronics, Inc.
- 15.3.9. General Electric Company (GE)
- 15.3.10. Gilardoni S.p.A.
- 15.3.11. Kromek Group plc
- 15.3.12. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 15.3.13. Leidos, Inc.
- 15.3.14. Metrasens Ltd.
- 15.3.15. Nuctech Company Limited
- 15.3.16. OSI Systems, Inc.
- 15.3.17. Rapiscan Systems, Inc.
- 15.3.18. Safran Identity & Security
- 15.3.19. Scan-X Security Ltd.
- 15.3.20. Securitas AB
- 15.3.21. Security Screening Technologies, LLC
- 15.3.22. Siemens Postal, Parcel & Airport Logistics GmbH
- 15.3.23. Smiths Detection, Inc.
- 15.3.24. Tek84 Inc.
- 15.3.25. Vanderlande Industries BV
- 15.3.26. VOTI Detection Inc.
- 15.3.27. Westminster International Ltd.
- 15.3.28. ZKTeco Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
