Report cover image

Aircraft Strut Market by Material Type (Aluminum Struts, Carbon Fiber Struts, Composite Struts), Application (Control Surface Struts/Linkage Struts, Engine Mount Struts, Fuselage Struts), Aircraft Type - Global Forecast 2025-2032

Publisher 360iResearch
Published Sep 30, 2025
Length 186 Pages
SKU # IRE20440729

Description

The Aircraft Strut Market was valued at USD 349.56 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 377.28 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.98%, reaching USD 646.35 million by 2032.

Foundational Perspectives on Aircraft Strut Development Uncovering the Evolutionary Pathways of Structural Components Driving Modern Aviation Innovations

Aircraft struts serve as indispensable structural elements that absorb aerodynamic loads, support fuselage and wing assemblies, and contribute to overall aircraft stability. Originating from early steel tube bracing, these components have evolved in tandem with advancements in materials science, manufacturing processes, and aerodynamic design. Over the decades, the increasing demand for lighter, stronger, and more corrosion-resistant structural parts has driven continuous improvement and refinement in strut design.

The introduction of advanced composites and high-performance alloys has reshaped production techniques, enabling thinner cross-sections without compromising strength. As aircraft platforms diversify across commercial, regional, business, and military segments, struts have adapted to novel configurations such as adaptive winglets, fly-by-wire linkage systems, and retractable landing gear. Within this dynamic environment, industry stakeholders must understand the interplay of materials, design certification, supplier networks, and aftermarket support. This summary synthesizes key drivers, transformative trends, and actionable guidance drawn from primary interviews, technical literature, and field data to equip decision-makers with a robust understanding of the present state and future trajectory of aircraft strut technologies.

Strategic Analysis of Disruptive Technological, Regulatory, and Supply Chain Shifts Reshaping the Aircraft Strut Landscape and Driving Market Evolution

The landscape of aircraft strut development has undergone transformative shifts fueled by breakthroughs in additive manufacturing, digital design platforms, and integrated sensor technology. Rapid prototyping now accelerates iterative testing cycles, reducing design validation timelines by leveraging topology optimization and generative design tools. By embedding strain gauges and microelectromechanical systems within strut assemblies, manufacturers can monitor in-service performance, predict maintenance intervals, and refine material selection based on real-time fatigue data.

Regulatory frameworks have also evolved to address environmental and safety imperatives. Stricter emissions targets and noise abatement rules drive the adoption of materials that offer high stiffness-to-weight ratios. Concurrently, new certification guidelines emphasize lifecycle traceability, requiring suppliers to demonstrate consistent quality control across global production networks. This regulatory momentum intersects with shifting supply chains, where geopolitical disruptions and raw material constraints prompt a resurgence in nearshoring and collaborative joint ventures. As manufacturing ecosystems become more interconnected, the ability to anticipate policy changes and integrate innovative processes will determine which organizations capture emerging opportunities in the aircraft strut market.

Assessment of the Cumulative Impacts of 2025 United States Tariff Measures on Aircraft Strut Supply Chains Production Costs and Sourcing Strategies

Assessment of the cumulative impacts of 2025 United States tariff measures reveals a complex interplay between import duties on key raw materials and the cost structure of component production. Increased levies on high-grade aluminum and specialty alloys have propagated through the supply chain, raising baseline material costs and prompting tier suppliers to re-evaluate supplier portfolios. For some manufacturers, this has translated into localized procurement strategies, seeking domestic sources or diversifying into alternative materials such as titanium-based composites.

Beyond direct cost implications, the tariff environment has altered strategic sourcing decisions. Organizations are recalibrating inventory buffers to mitigate volatility, investing in hedging mechanisms, and forging long-term agreements with integrated raw material providers. As a result, collaboration across engineering, procurement, and finance functions has become paramount in maintaining program viability. In response to these shifts, leading integrators have initiated joint development programs to co-fund process improvements that offset duty burdens, ensuring that launch timelines remain unchanged despite evolving trade policies.

Insightful Analysis of Material Type Application and Aircraft Type Segmentation Revealing Critical Demand Drivers and Performance Trends in Aircraft Strut Markets

When examining material type segmentation, aluminum struts continue to offer cost-efficiency and well-understood manufacturing processes for standard airframe architectures, while carbon fiber struts deliver significant weight savings and enhanced fatigue performance in high-end applications. Composite struts bridge the mechanical strength and design flexibility requirements, enabling complex geometries with reduced part counts. Steel struts retain their relevance in heavy-load scenarios such as landing gear, where high toughness and damage tolerance are paramount. Titanium struts command premium applications under extreme temperature and corrosion conditions, often paired with critical engine mount assemblies.

Application segmentation reveals distinct demand drivers across control surface struts, which prioritize precision and minimal deflection for responsive handling; engine mount struts, where thermal stability is vital; fuselage struts, tasked with maintaining cabin integrity under pressurization cycles; landing gear struts, designed for shock absorption and structural resilience; and wing bracing struts, which balance aerodynamic efficiency with load distribution. Each application domain necessitates a tailored material and process mix to fulfill performance, certification, and maintenance objectives.

Across aircraft type segmentation, commercial aircraft sustain a robust need for lightweight, cost-optimized strut solutions aligned with high utilization rates and streamlined maintenance intervals. Military aircraft demand mission-specific configurations that incorporate stealth materials, redundant safety features, and rapid field-serviceability. These distinct operating profiles drive divergent research priorities and specialized supply chain partnerships throughout the strut ecosystem.

Deep Dive into Regional Dynamics Across the Americas EMEA and Asia Pacific Highlighting Regulatory Influence and Production Variations for Aircraft Strut

In the Americas region, established aerospace clusters support complex landing gear and wing strut production through integrated hubs spanning design, manufacturing, and aftermarket services. Collaboration between defense contractors and commercial airframe integrators underpins innovations in high-strength alloys and adaptive strut designs. Meanwhile, domestic policy initiatives aimed at revitalizing advanced manufacturing have accelerated investments in additive capabilities and digital twins.

Within Europe, Middle East & Africa, stringent environmental regulations and noise reduction mandates have catalyzed the adoption of next-generation composite struts across major airframe programs. European research consortia are pioneering multi-metallic joining techniques and advanced surface treatments to extend component lifespans and reduce lifecycle maintenance. At the same time, Middle East defense modernization efforts are stimulating demand for ruggedized strut systems tailored to harsh operating environments.

Asia-Pacific has emerged as a manufacturing powerhouse, with rapidly expanding regional airlines and defense budgets driving localized production of aluminum and steel struts. Government incentives and strategic partnerships with global OEMs have resulted in technology transfers and capacity expansions. As cost-competitive facilities proliferate, regional suppliers are integrating quality management systems and certification processes to align with international airworthiness standards.

Illuminating Strategic Collaborations Technological Innovations and Competitive Postures of Leading Aircraft Strut Manufacturers and Key Industry Players

Leading OEMs and tier-one suppliers are forging strategic alliances with specialized composite fabricators to de-risk supply chains and accelerate the onboarding of advanced materials. Technology licensing agreements have become prevalent, enabling smaller players to access proprietary resin systems and automated layup machinery. At the same time, investments in digital inspection tools and nondestructive evaluation techniques have enhanced quality assurance, reducing scrap rates and improving throughput across multiple facilities.

Notable collaborations between structural integrators and sensor technology companies have given rise to smart strut prototypes that deliver continuous health monitoring. These innovations are being tested in retrofitted fleets and next-generation turboprop programs to validate lifecycle benefits. Concurrently, several established component manufacturers are expanding their global footprints through acquisitions of niche alloy producers, pooling expertise in heat-treatment processes and forging capabilities. By balancing organic research initiatives with targeted M&A, these organizations are positioning themselves to capture emerging requirements across commercial, business, and defense segments.

Actionable Strategies and Tactical Roadmaps for Industry Leaders to Enhance Resilience Efficiency and Innovation Across Aircraft Strut Value Chains

Industry leaders should prioritize the integration of digital engineering platforms that unify design, analysis, and production workflows. By adopting model-based definition and digital thread principles, organizations can reduce prototype iterations and accelerate certification milestones. At the same time, diversifying material sourcing strategies-by qualifying secondary suppliers for high-performance alloys and composites-will mitigate exposure to geopolitical shifts and raw material constraints.

Establishing cross-functional councils comprising engineering, procurement, and finance teams will enhance decision-making agility in response to evolving trade policies and regulatory mandates. Collaboration with maintenance providers to develop predictive analytics for strut life-cycle management can unlock aftermarket value and generate new revenue streams. Finally, investing in additive manufacturing for toolless production of complex strut geometries will support low-volume and mission-specific configurations, ensuring competitiveness across both commercial and military platforms.

Comprehensive Research Methodology Detailing Primary and Secondary Data Collection Analytical Frameworks and Validation Techniques for Aircraft Strut Insights

This analysis is underpinned by a comprehensive research methodology combining primary and secondary data collection. Primary research included in-depth interviews with design engineers, procurement leaders, and maintenance experts across global aerospace integrators. These discussions provided insights into material preferences, certification challenges, and supply chain resilience strategies.

Secondary research leveraged technical publications, regulatory standards, patent databases, and white papers to map historical trends and emerging technologies. Data points were triangulated through cross-referencing expert feedback with production case studies and publicly available maintenance logs. Quality control protocols ensured data accuracy, while statistical validation techniques identified outliers and confirmed consistency across multiple sources. This rigorous approach enables stakeholders to rely on robust, evidence-based findings when crafting strategic initiatives in the aircraft strut domain.

Conclusive Reflections on Aircraft Strut Industry Trends Strategic Imperatives and Forward Looking Considerations for Sustained Competitive Advantage

The evolution of aircraft strut technologies reflects a broader trend toward lightweight structures, digital integration, and resilient supply chains. Manufacturers and integrators that embrace advanced composites, additive processes, and real-time monitoring will gain a sustainable edge in performance and cost efficiency. Simultaneously, the ability to navigate complex trade regulations and diversify material sourcing will be critical in maintaining operational continuity.

As the aerospace industry transitions to next-generation platforms with stringent environmental and safety requirements, strategic alignment between R&D, procurement, and aftermarket service functions will determine market leadership. Organizations that invest holistically-in people, processes, and technologies-will be best positioned to capitalize on emerging opportunities across commercial, regional, business, and defense segments. This synthesis of current trends and forward-looking considerations provides a roadmap for achieving long-term competitive advantage in the aircraft strut arena.

Market Segmentation & Coverage

This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-segmentations:

Material Type
Aluminum Struts
Carbon Fiber Struts
Composite Struts
Steel Struts
Titanium Struts
Application
Control Surface Struts/Linkage Struts
Engine Mount Struts
Fuselage Struts
Landing Gear Struts
Wing Struts/Bracing Struts
Aircraft Type
Commercial Aircraft
Military Aircraft

This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-regions:

Americas
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Latin America
Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Colombia
Peru
Europe, Middle East & Africa
Europe
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
Switzerland
Middle East
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Turkey
Israel
Africa
South Africa
Nigeria
Egypt
Kenya
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
Australia
South Korea
Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia
Singapore
Taiwan

This research report categorizes to delves into recent significant developments and analyze trends in each of the following companies:

Safran Landing Systems SAS
Collins Aerospace Inc.
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Eaton Corporation plc
Honeywell International Inc.
Moog Inc.
Triumph Group, Inc.
Liebherr-International Deutschland GmbH
RTX Corporation
Intrex Aerospace

Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year

Table of Contents

186 Pages
1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Increasing use of additive manufacturing techniques in aircraft strut production for lightweight designs
5.2. Development of smart sensor-enabled struts for real-time structural health monitoring and predictive maintenance
5.3. Shift toward hydraulic-free or electromechanical actuation systems integrated within aircraft strut assemblies
5.4. Adoption of eco-friendly hydraulic fluids and seal materials to comply with stringent environmental regulations
5.5. Collaboration between OEMs and material suppliers to develop next-generation high-strength lightweight alloys for struts
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Aircraft Strut Market, by Material Type
8.1. Aluminum Struts
8.2. Carbon Fiber Struts
8.3. Composite Struts
8.4. Steel Struts
8.5. Titanium Struts
9. Aircraft Strut Market, by Application
9.1. Control Surface Struts/Linkage Struts
9.2. Engine Mount Struts
9.3. Fuselage Struts
9.4. Landing Gear Struts
9.5. Wing Struts/Bracing Struts
10. Aircraft Strut Market, by Aircraft Type
10.1. Commercial Aircraft
10.2. Military Aircraft
11. Aircraft Strut Market, by Region
11.1. Americas
11.1.1. North America
11.1.2. Latin America
11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
11.2.1. Europe
11.2.2. Middle East
11.2.3. Africa
11.3. Asia-Pacific
12. Aircraft Strut Market, by Group
12.1. ASEAN
12.2. GCC
12.3. European Union
12.4. BRICS
12.5. G7
12.6. NATO
13. Aircraft Strut Market, by Country
13.1. United States
13.2. Canada
13.3. Mexico
13.4. Brazil
13.5. United Kingdom
13.6. Germany
13.7. France
13.8. Russia
13.9. Italy
13.10. Spain
13.11. China
13.12. India
13.13. Japan
13.14. Australia
13.15. South Korea
14. Competitive Landscape
14.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
14.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
14.3. Competitive Analysis
14.3.1. Safran Landing Systems SAS
14.3.2. Collins Aerospace Inc.
14.3.3. Parker Hannifin Corporation
14.3.4. Eaton Corporation plc
14.3.5. Honeywell International Inc.
14.3.6. Moog Inc.
14.3.7. Triumph Group, Inc.
14.3.8. Liebherr-International Deutschland GmbH
14.3.9. RTX Corporation
14.3.10. Intrex Aerospace
How Do Licenses Work?
Request A Sample
Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.