Aircraft Electrification Market by Propulsion Type (Fully Electric, Hybrid Electric), Aircraft Type (Business Jets, Cargo Aircraft, Commuter Aircraft), Components, Range, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Aircraft Electrification Market was valued at USD 8.78 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 10.13 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 15.59%, reaching USD 28.01 billion by 2032.
A strategic overview that positions aircraft electrification as a multi-dimensional technological and operational transformation reshaping aviation value chains
The shift toward aircraft electrification represents a fundamental technology and business-model inflection point for aviation. Advances in energy storage, power electronics, and electric propulsion architectures are converging with changing regulatory priorities and new commercial entrants to reshape how aircraft are designed, manufactured, and operated. This introduction frames electrification not as a niche experiment but as a multi-dimensional transformation that touches propulsion, airframe integration, maintenance, airport infrastructure, and value-chain economics.
As stakeholders evaluate next-generation aircraft concepts, decision-makers face interconnected technical and commercial trade-offs. Battery energy density and thermal management directly influence vehicle range and payload, while motor topology and power electronics dictate integration complexity and maintainability. Meanwhile, operational considerations such as charging infrastructure, ground handling, and pilot training require coordinated industry and public-sector responses. Together, these elements define the pathways by which electrified aircraft move from prototypes and flight demonstrations to regulated commercial operations. The pace and shape of adoption will hinge on the alignment of technology readiness, regulatory adaptation, and the ability of supply chains to scale reliably.
How distributed propulsion, new commercial models, evolving supply chains, and regulatory adaptation are jointly redefining aerospace technology and operations
Electrification is catalyzing several transformative shifts across the aviation landscape, altering priorities for manufacturers, operators, and regulators. First, propulsion is being reconceived from a centralized thermodynamic engine to distributed electrified architectures, enabling new vehicle configurations and redundancy models. This technical shift is complemented by a business-model evolution where revenue streams extend beyond aircraft sales into energy services, charging operations, and digital performance optimization.
Second, supply chains are reorganizing around high‑value, technology‑dense components such as battery systems, power electronics, and high‑torque electric motors. Suppliers that historically served automotive or industrial segments are increasingly relevant, and vertical collaboration is accelerating to reduce integration risk. Third, regulatory and certification frameworks are evolving to address unique requirements for electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and thermal runaway mitigation. These regulatory adaptations will influence program timelines and design trade-offs. Finally, the entry of urban air mobility and eVTOL concepts is expanding stakeholder sets to include municipal authorities and new ground‑infrastructure providers, requiring cross‑sectoral coordination that extends beyond traditional aerospace ecosystems.
Assessing how recent tariff actions alter sourcing economics, supply chain resilience, and strategic manufacturing decisions across electrified aircraft value chains
Recent and prospective tariff measures originating from the United States have introduced an additional layer of complexity to aircraft electrification by affecting cross‑border sourcing decisions and supplier economics. Tariff actions that raise duties on imported components or precursor materials make it more expensive to rely on single‑country supply lines, prompting both manufacturers and suppliers to reassess supplier portfolios and nearshore alternatives. As a result, procurement strategies increasingly emphasize supply‑chain resilience and dual sourcing for critical components such as battery cells, power converters, and high‑precision electric motors.
These dynamics also change cost structures for prototype and early production runs, where scale advantages are limited and supplier switching is more difficult. In response, firms are accelerating localization of certain value‑chain activities, forming joint ventures, or investing in domestic manufacturing capabilities to mitigate tariff exposure. The cumulative effect extends beyond direct cost impacts; market participants report longer lead times for qualifying new suppliers and elevated compliance burdens associated with rules of origin documentation. Together, these factors increase the strategic premium on supply‑chain transparency, contractual flexibility, and scenario planning, and they make early engagement with logistics and trade teams essential for program continuity.
A multidimensional segmentation synthesis revealing propulsion architectures, aircraft mission profiles, component priorities, range classes, and end‑user imperatives that guide strategic investment
Segmentation analysis reveals where technological progress and commercial opportunity intersect and clarifies the focus areas for investment. When the market is framed by propulsion type, the fully electric pathway divides into battery electric and fuel cell electric approaches, each with distinct energy‑storage, thermal management, and refueling or recharging infrastructure requirements. Hybrid electric propulsion branches into parallel hybrid, series hybrid, and turboelectric topologies, which present differing trade‑offs between fuel dependency, electrical load distribution, and mission efficiency. These propulsion distinctions inform aircraft architecture choices and maintenance regimes.
Framing the market by aircraft type surfaces the diversity of operational profiles, with business jets, cargo aircraft, commuter aircraft, eVTOL vehicles, and midsize commercial jets each demanding tailored solutions. eVTOL variants include fixed‑wing VTOL, lift‑plus‑cruise, and multirotor concepts, and those sub‑architectures impose unique constraints on motor redundancy, energy density needs, and noise signatures. Component‑level segmentation highlights battery systems, electric motors, power electronics, and thermal management systems as focal points. Within batteries, lithium‑ion and emerging solid‑state chemistries have distinct implications for safety, volumetric energy, and lifecycle management. Motor architectures such as axial flux and radial flux offer differing torque and packaging advantages, while power‑electronics components like converters and inverters govern control fidelity. Thermal management splits between air cooling and liquid cooling approaches, each influencing packaging, weight, and reliability.
Range‑based segmentation-long range, medium range, and short range-clarifies which propulsion and component combinations are feasible for particular missions, while end‑user perspectives across cargo operators, commercial airlines, general aviation, and military users expose differing priorities in operational cost, mission reliability, and certification risk. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide a multidimensional map that helps stakeholders prioritize R&D, allocate capital across component subsegments, and align product roadmaps with operator needs.
How regional industrial strengths, regulatory priorities, and infrastructure investments in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific jointly shape electrified aviation trajectories
Regional dynamics are shaping the pace and character of aircraft electrification as regulatory frameworks, industrial capabilities, and capital availability vary by geography. In the Americas, innovation clusters and established OEMs support rapid prototyping and a strong focus on certification pathways, while policy incentives and private capital are channeling resources into both eVTOL startups and component suppliers. This environment encourages vertically integrated approaches and strengthens domestic manufacturing momentum for high‑value components.
In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a mosaic of regulatory harmonization efforts and industrial partnerships that favor collaborative testbeds and public‑private programs. European airspace management priorities and noise regulations are influencing vehicle designs toward quieter architectures and community acceptance frameworks. The Middle East has shown targeted interest in advanced air mobility as a component of broader smart‑city ambitions, with substantial investments in demonstration corridors and infrastructure trials. Across Africa, electrification initiatives are still nascent but present long‑term opportunities for point‑to‑point regional connectivity.
Asia‑Pacific combines large domestic aerospace and automotive supply bases with strong manufacturing scale for battery and power‑electronics components, fostering cost competitiveness and rapid production ramp capabilities. Policy support in parts of Asia‑Pacific is accelerating adoption of electric propulsion at small aircraft and urban air mobility scales. Interregional partnerships and trade relationships will therefore be crucial in reconciling component sourcing with certification reciprocity and operational integration across these varied regional ecosystems.
Insights on how incumbents, specialists, and integrators are aligning technology focus, partnership models, and certification strategies to capture early electrification opportunities
Industry participants are organizing around core technology domains and program execution capabilities, with different firms focusing on propulsion systems, energy storage, systems integration, and vehicle certification. Established aerospace OEMs are investing in in‑house electrification programs and strategic partnerships to secure access to advanced motors, power electronics, and battery packs. At the same time, specialist suppliers and technology startups are concentrating on high‑performance subcomponents such as axial flux motors, high‑efficiency inverters, and advanced thermal‑management solutions that can be integrated across multiple platform types.
Collaboration models are evolving: long‑term supplier agreements and equity investments allow OEMs to de‑risk supply continuity and accelerate knowledge transfer, while consortiums and standards groups facilitate interoperability and regulatory harmonization. Maintenance, repair, and overhaul providers are also adapting by developing new diagnostic capabilities and training regimes for high‑voltage systems. Across all company types, the dominant themes are speed to demonstration, demonstrable reliability under operational cycles, and clear certification pathways. Firms that can combine deep systems engineering with scalable manufacturing and rigorous safety cases are positioning themselves to capture early commercial programs and ongoing aftermarket revenues.
Practical operational, supply‑chain, regulatory, and partnership actions that executives should execute to de‑risk programs and accelerate commercial readiness for electrified aircraft
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of concrete actions that bridge near‑term program execution and longer‑term strategic positioning. First, invest in modular component architectures that allow substitution between battery chemistries or motor topologies without wholesale redesign, thereby accelerating qualification pathways and protecting against supply disruptions. Second, implement rigorous supply‑chain mapping and dual‑sourcing strategies for critical materials and subassemblies; this will reduce exposure to tariff and geopolitical shocks and enable smoother scale‑up from prototypes to production.
Third, embed certification and regulatory engagement into program planning from day one. Early dialogue with authorities on electrical safety, thermal management, and electromagnetic compatibility reduces downstream redesign risk and shortens time to entry. Fourth, cultivate cross‑sector partnerships with energy companies and municipal infrastructure planners to align charging or refueling ecosystem development with vehicle deployment roadmaps. Fifth, invest in workforce development and maintenance frameworks that address high‑voltage safety and system diagnostics to ensure operational reliability. Finally, adopt scenario‑based investment prioritization that balances near‑term demonstration objectives with strategic bets on battery chemistry, motor architecture, and vehicle segment. These steps collectively reduce technical and commercial risk while preserving optionality as technologies and regulations evolve.
A transparent, multi‑source research approach combining technical literature synthesis, primary stakeholder interviews, supply‑chain mapping, and scenario analysis to inform actionable insights
The research underpinning this report combines multiple evidence streams to ensure analytical rigor and practical relevance. We synthesized technical literature, regulatory guidance, patent filings, and supplier disclosures to construct component‑level technology trajectories. These secondary sources provided the baseline for understanding material constraints and design trade‑offs, which we then validated through targeted primary interviews with propulsion engineers, certification specialists, procurement leads, and operators to capture real‑world program dynamics and risk perceptions.
Quantitative supply‑chain mapping and qualitative scenario analysis were used to identify chokepoints and stress‑test resilience under different trade and tariff assumptions. Cross‑validation was achieved through triangulation across independent data sources, and sensitivity assessments were employed to explore how variations in battery energy density, motor efficiency, and regulatory timelines affect program feasibility. Wherever possible, findings referenced verifiable regulatory publications, manufacturer technical disclosures, and peer‑reviewed engineering studies to ground conclusions in publicly available evidence. The methodology emphasizes transparency, repeatability, and a clear separation between observed facts and forward‑looking strategic implications.
A concise synthesis that connects technological progress, regulatory readiness, and industrial strategy to define practical pathways for safely scaling electrified aviation
Electrification of aircraft represents a complex interplay of technological innovation, regulatory evolution, and industrial reconfiguration. Advances in battery systems, motor architectures, and power-electronics control are unlocking new vehicle forms and operating models, but commercialization requires coordinated progress on certification standards, supply‑chain resilience, and infrastructure build‑out. Stakeholders who align their R&D investments with modular design principles, engage proactively with regulators, and diversify sourcing are better positioned to convert demonstrations into sustained operations.
The journey from flight test to routine commercial service will be uneven across segments: short‑range and urban mobility concepts may achieve operational viability earlier, while long‑range and larger commercial platforms will depend on sustained breakthroughs in energy density and system integration. In all cases, collaboration across industry, government, and energy providers will accelerate the safe, efficient, and publicly acceptable deployment of electrified aircraft. For executives, the challenge is to balance paced experimentation with disciplined program management so that innovation scales without compromising reliability or safety.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic overview that positions aircraft electrification as a multi-dimensional technological and operational transformation reshaping aviation value chains
The shift toward aircraft electrification represents a fundamental technology and business-model inflection point for aviation. Advances in energy storage, power electronics, and electric propulsion architectures are converging with changing regulatory priorities and new commercial entrants to reshape how aircraft are designed, manufactured, and operated. This introduction frames electrification not as a niche experiment but as a multi-dimensional transformation that touches propulsion, airframe integration, maintenance, airport infrastructure, and value-chain economics.
As stakeholders evaluate next-generation aircraft concepts, decision-makers face interconnected technical and commercial trade-offs. Battery energy density and thermal management directly influence vehicle range and payload, while motor topology and power electronics dictate integration complexity and maintainability. Meanwhile, operational considerations such as charging infrastructure, ground handling, and pilot training require coordinated industry and public-sector responses. Together, these elements define the pathways by which electrified aircraft move from prototypes and flight demonstrations to regulated commercial operations. The pace and shape of adoption will hinge on the alignment of technology readiness, regulatory adaptation, and the ability of supply chains to scale reliably.
How distributed propulsion, new commercial models, evolving supply chains, and regulatory adaptation are jointly redefining aerospace technology and operations
Electrification is catalyzing several transformative shifts across the aviation landscape, altering priorities for manufacturers, operators, and regulators. First, propulsion is being reconceived from a centralized thermodynamic engine to distributed electrified architectures, enabling new vehicle configurations and redundancy models. This technical shift is complemented by a business-model evolution where revenue streams extend beyond aircraft sales into energy services, charging operations, and digital performance optimization.
Second, supply chains are reorganizing around high‑value, technology‑dense components such as battery systems, power electronics, and high‑torque electric motors. Suppliers that historically served automotive or industrial segments are increasingly relevant, and vertical collaboration is accelerating to reduce integration risk. Third, regulatory and certification frameworks are evolving to address unique requirements for electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and thermal runaway mitigation. These regulatory adaptations will influence program timelines and design trade-offs. Finally, the entry of urban air mobility and eVTOL concepts is expanding stakeholder sets to include municipal authorities and new ground‑infrastructure providers, requiring cross‑sectoral coordination that extends beyond traditional aerospace ecosystems.
Assessing how recent tariff actions alter sourcing economics, supply chain resilience, and strategic manufacturing decisions across electrified aircraft value chains
Recent and prospective tariff measures originating from the United States have introduced an additional layer of complexity to aircraft electrification by affecting cross‑border sourcing decisions and supplier economics. Tariff actions that raise duties on imported components or precursor materials make it more expensive to rely on single‑country supply lines, prompting both manufacturers and suppliers to reassess supplier portfolios and nearshore alternatives. As a result, procurement strategies increasingly emphasize supply‑chain resilience and dual sourcing for critical components such as battery cells, power converters, and high‑precision electric motors.
These dynamics also change cost structures for prototype and early production runs, where scale advantages are limited and supplier switching is more difficult. In response, firms are accelerating localization of certain value‑chain activities, forming joint ventures, or investing in domestic manufacturing capabilities to mitigate tariff exposure. The cumulative effect extends beyond direct cost impacts; market participants report longer lead times for qualifying new suppliers and elevated compliance burdens associated with rules of origin documentation. Together, these factors increase the strategic premium on supply‑chain transparency, contractual flexibility, and scenario planning, and they make early engagement with logistics and trade teams essential for program continuity.
A multidimensional segmentation synthesis revealing propulsion architectures, aircraft mission profiles, component priorities, range classes, and end‑user imperatives that guide strategic investment
Segmentation analysis reveals where technological progress and commercial opportunity intersect and clarifies the focus areas for investment. When the market is framed by propulsion type, the fully electric pathway divides into battery electric and fuel cell electric approaches, each with distinct energy‑storage, thermal management, and refueling or recharging infrastructure requirements. Hybrid electric propulsion branches into parallel hybrid, series hybrid, and turboelectric topologies, which present differing trade‑offs between fuel dependency, electrical load distribution, and mission efficiency. These propulsion distinctions inform aircraft architecture choices and maintenance regimes.
Framing the market by aircraft type surfaces the diversity of operational profiles, with business jets, cargo aircraft, commuter aircraft, eVTOL vehicles, and midsize commercial jets each demanding tailored solutions. eVTOL variants include fixed‑wing VTOL, lift‑plus‑cruise, and multirotor concepts, and those sub‑architectures impose unique constraints on motor redundancy, energy density needs, and noise signatures. Component‑level segmentation highlights battery systems, electric motors, power electronics, and thermal management systems as focal points. Within batteries, lithium‑ion and emerging solid‑state chemistries have distinct implications for safety, volumetric energy, and lifecycle management. Motor architectures such as axial flux and radial flux offer differing torque and packaging advantages, while power‑electronics components like converters and inverters govern control fidelity. Thermal management splits between air cooling and liquid cooling approaches, each influencing packaging, weight, and reliability.
Range‑based segmentation-long range, medium range, and short range-clarifies which propulsion and component combinations are feasible for particular missions, while end‑user perspectives across cargo operators, commercial airlines, general aviation, and military users expose differing priorities in operational cost, mission reliability, and certification risk. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide a multidimensional map that helps stakeholders prioritize R&D, allocate capital across component subsegments, and align product roadmaps with operator needs.
How regional industrial strengths, regulatory priorities, and infrastructure investments in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific jointly shape electrified aviation trajectories
Regional dynamics are shaping the pace and character of aircraft electrification as regulatory frameworks, industrial capabilities, and capital availability vary by geography. In the Americas, innovation clusters and established OEMs support rapid prototyping and a strong focus on certification pathways, while policy incentives and private capital are channeling resources into both eVTOL startups and component suppliers. This environment encourages vertically integrated approaches and strengthens domestic manufacturing momentum for high‑value components.
In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a mosaic of regulatory harmonization efforts and industrial partnerships that favor collaborative testbeds and public‑private programs. European airspace management priorities and noise regulations are influencing vehicle designs toward quieter architectures and community acceptance frameworks. The Middle East has shown targeted interest in advanced air mobility as a component of broader smart‑city ambitions, with substantial investments in demonstration corridors and infrastructure trials. Across Africa, electrification initiatives are still nascent but present long‑term opportunities for point‑to‑point regional connectivity.
Asia‑Pacific combines large domestic aerospace and automotive supply bases with strong manufacturing scale for battery and power‑electronics components, fostering cost competitiveness and rapid production ramp capabilities. Policy support in parts of Asia‑Pacific is accelerating adoption of electric propulsion at small aircraft and urban air mobility scales. Interregional partnerships and trade relationships will therefore be crucial in reconciling component sourcing with certification reciprocity and operational integration across these varied regional ecosystems.
Insights on how incumbents, specialists, and integrators are aligning technology focus, partnership models, and certification strategies to capture early electrification opportunities
Industry participants are organizing around core technology domains and program execution capabilities, with different firms focusing on propulsion systems, energy storage, systems integration, and vehicle certification. Established aerospace OEMs are investing in in‑house electrification programs and strategic partnerships to secure access to advanced motors, power electronics, and battery packs. At the same time, specialist suppliers and technology startups are concentrating on high‑performance subcomponents such as axial flux motors, high‑efficiency inverters, and advanced thermal‑management solutions that can be integrated across multiple platform types.
Collaboration models are evolving: long‑term supplier agreements and equity investments allow OEMs to de‑risk supply continuity and accelerate knowledge transfer, while consortiums and standards groups facilitate interoperability and regulatory harmonization. Maintenance, repair, and overhaul providers are also adapting by developing new diagnostic capabilities and training regimes for high‑voltage systems. Across all company types, the dominant themes are speed to demonstration, demonstrable reliability under operational cycles, and clear certification pathways. Firms that can combine deep systems engineering with scalable manufacturing and rigorous safety cases are positioning themselves to capture early commercial programs and ongoing aftermarket revenues.
Practical operational, supply‑chain, regulatory, and partnership actions that executives should execute to de‑risk programs and accelerate commercial readiness for electrified aircraft
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of concrete actions that bridge near‑term program execution and longer‑term strategic positioning. First, invest in modular component architectures that allow substitution between battery chemistries or motor topologies without wholesale redesign, thereby accelerating qualification pathways and protecting against supply disruptions. Second, implement rigorous supply‑chain mapping and dual‑sourcing strategies for critical materials and subassemblies; this will reduce exposure to tariff and geopolitical shocks and enable smoother scale‑up from prototypes to production.
Third, embed certification and regulatory engagement into program planning from day one. Early dialogue with authorities on electrical safety, thermal management, and electromagnetic compatibility reduces downstream redesign risk and shortens time to entry. Fourth, cultivate cross‑sector partnerships with energy companies and municipal infrastructure planners to align charging or refueling ecosystem development with vehicle deployment roadmaps. Fifth, invest in workforce development and maintenance frameworks that address high‑voltage safety and system diagnostics to ensure operational reliability. Finally, adopt scenario‑based investment prioritization that balances near‑term demonstration objectives with strategic bets on battery chemistry, motor architecture, and vehicle segment. These steps collectively reduce technical and commercial risk while preserving optionality as technologies and regulations evolve.
A transparent, multi‑source research approach combining technical literature synthesis, primary stakeholder interviews, supply‑chain mapping, and scenario analysis to inform actionable insights
The research underpinning this report combines multiple evidence streams to ensure analytical rigor and practical relevance. We synthesized technical literature, regulatory guidance, patent filings, and supplier disclosures to construct component‑level technology trajectories. These secondary sources provided the baseline for understanding material constraints and design trade‑offs, which we then validated through targeted primary interviews with propulsion engineers, certification specialists, procurement leads, and operators to capture real‑world program dynamics and risk perceptions.
Quantitative supply‑chain mapping and qualitative scenario analysis were used to identify chokepoints and stress‑test resilience under different trade and tariff assumptions. Cross‑validation was achieved through triangulation across independent data sources, and sensitivity assessments were employed to explore how variations in battery energy density, motor efficiency, and regulatory timelines affect program feasibility. Wherever possible, findings referenced verifiable regulatory publications, manufacturer technical disclosures, and peer‑reviewed engineering studies to ground conclusions in publicly available evidence. The methodology emphasizes transparency, repeatability, and a clear separation between observed facts and forward‑looking strategic implications.
A concise synthesis that connects technological progress, regulatory readiness, and industrial strategy to define practical pathways for safely scaling electrified aviation
Electrification of aircraft represents a complex interplay of technological innovation, regulatory evolution, and industrial reconfiguration. Advances in battery systems, motor architectures, and power-electronics control are unlocking new vehicle forms and operating models, but commercialization requires coordinated progress on certification standards, supply‑chain resilience, and infrastructure build‑out. Stakeholders who align their R&D investments with modular design principles, engage proactively with regulators, and diversify sourcing are better positioned to convert demonstrations into sustained operations.
The journey from flight test to routine commercial service will be uneven across segments: short‑range and urban mobility concepts may achieve operational viability earlier, while long‑range and larger commercial platforms will depend on sustained breakthroughs in energy density and system integration. In all cases, collaboration across industry, government, and energy providers will accelerate the safe, efficient, and publicly acceptable deployment of electrified aircraft. For executives, the challenge is to balance paced experimentation with disciplined program management so that innovation scales without compromising reliability or safety.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Development of high-energy-density solid-state batteries for extended range electric aircraft
- 5.2. Implementation of electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft in urban air mobility networks
- 5.3. Integration of wireless in-flight power transmission systems for continuous distributed propulsion performance
- 5.4. Advancements in retrofitting existing regional jets with hybrid-electric propulsion architectures
- 5.5. Collaboration between OEMs and battery manufacturers to standardize high-power charging interfaces airportwide
- 5.6. Development of lightweight composite wiring and electrical bus systems for reduced aircraft mass
- 5.7. Regulatory harmonization efforts to certify all-electric aircraft under unified international safety standards
- 5.8. Scaling manufacturing processes for high-power electric propulsion motors to meet aircraft industry demand
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Aircraft Electrification Market, by Propulsion Type
- 8.1. Fully Electric
- 8.1.1. Battery Electric
- 8.1.2. Fuel Cell Electric
- 8.2. Hybrid Electric
- 8.2.1. Parallel Hybrid
- 8.2.2. Series Hybrid
- 8.2.3. Turboelectric
- 9. Aircraft Electrification Market, by Aircraft Type
- 9.1. Business Jets
- 9.2. Cargo Aircraft
- 9.3. Commuter Aircraft
- 9.4. eVTOL Vehicles
- 9.4.1. Fixed-Wing VTOL
- 9.4.2. Lift-Plus-Cruise
- 9.4.3. Multirotor
- 9.5. Midsize Commercial Jets
- 10. Aircraft Electrification Market, by Components
- 10.1. Battery Systems
- 10.1.1. Lithium-Ion Batteries
- 10.1.2. Solid-State Batteries
- 10.2. Electric Motors
- 10.2.1. Axial Flux Motors
- 10.2.2. Radial Flux Motors
- 10.3. Power Electronics
- 10.3.1. Converters
- 10.3.2. Inverters
- 10.4. Thermal Management Systems
- 10.4.1. Air Cooling
- 10.4.2. Liquid Cooling
- 11. Aircraft Electrification Market, by Range
- 11.1. Long Range
- 11.2. Medium Range
- 11.3. Short Range
- 12. Aircraft Electrification Market, by End User
- 12.1. Cargo Operators
- 12.2. Commercial Airlines
- 12.3. General Aviation
- 12.4. Military Users
- 13. Aircraft Electrification Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Aircraft Electrification Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Aircraft Electrification Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Acme Aerospace Inc. & Avionic Instruments LLC by Transdigm Group, Inc.
- 16.3.2. Aegis Power Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.3. Airbus SE
- 16.3.4. AMETEK Inc.
- 16.3.5. Astronics Corporation
- 16.3.6. BAE Systems PLC
- 16.3.7. Carlisle Interconnect Technologies
- 16.3.8. Collins Aerospace by Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- 16.3.9. Crane Aerospace & Electronics
- 16.3.10. EaglePicher Technologies
- 16.3.11. Electromech Technologies
- 16.3.12. EnerSys
- 16.3.13. General Electric Company
- 16.3.14. Hartzell Engine Technologies LLC by Tailwind Technologies Inc.
- 16.3.15. Honeywell International Inc.
- 16.3.16. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 16.3.17. magniX
- 16.3.18. Meggitt PLC by Parker-Hannifin Corporation
- 16.3.19. Nabtesco Corporation
- 16.3.20. Nidec Corporation
- 16.3.21. Pioneer Magnetics, Inc.
- 16.3.22. Rolls-Royce plc
- 16.3.23. Safran Group
- 16.3.24. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
- 16.3.25. Thales Group
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
