Air & Missile Defense Radar Market by Deployment Mode (Fixed, Mobile), Component (Antenna, Receiver, Signal Processor), Platform Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Air & Missile Defense Radar Market was valued at USD 8.55 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 9.02 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.62%, reaching USD 13.25 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction to the evolving imperatives for radar modernization, integrating modular architectures and mission-focused acquisition strategies for resilience
The opening of this executive summary frames the contemporary imperatives for air and missile defense radar capabilities amid accelerating threats and technological shifts. Across operational theaters, radars are no longer stand-alone sensors but nodes within integrated sensor-fusion ecosystems that demand higher fidelity, lower latency, and resilient performance under contested electromagnetic and cyber environments. Decision-makers face the dual challenge of modernizing legacy systems while incorporating emergent capabilities such as wideband digital beamforming and advanced electronic protection. Consequently, procurement and R&D strategies increasingly prioritize modular, software-defined architectures that enable iterative upgrades without wholesale system replacement.
Moreover, geopolitical competition has elevated the need for persistent situational awareness across multiple domains, requiring radar programs to balance strategic reach with tactical responsiveness. This balancing act is further complicated by constrained acquisition cycles, supply chain volatility, and evolving regulatory frameworks that influence component availability. Therefore, stakeholders must adopt an integrated approach that links capability roadmaps with supplier ecosystems, certification pathways, and mission-tailored performance metrics. In doing so, leaders can better position programs to meet immediate operational demands while maintaining adaptability for future threat vectors and doctrinal shifts.
Analysis of transformative technological and operational shifts reshaping radar detection paradigms, sensor fusion, and acquisition strategies for contested environments
The radar landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by rapid advances in both threat capabilities and enabling technologies. Increasingly sophisticated missile types, including maneuvering and low-observable weapons, are forcing a departure from single-sensor solutions toward distributed, networked sensor arrays that can sustain tracking and handoff across domains. At the same time, semiconductor advancements such as gallium nitride technologies and monolithic integration are enabling radars to achieve higher power efficiency, broader bandwidths, and greater thermal robustness, which together expand detection envelopes and improve countermeasure resistance.
Additionally, software-defined systems and open architectures are accelerating capability delivery cycles by allowing new signal processing algorithms to be fielded without major hardware refreshes. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have matured enough to augment signal discrimination and reduce false alarm rates, particularly in dense contact environments. Operationally, there is a clear move toward multi-mission platforms that can perform air surveillance, early warning, and target tracking in parallel, thereby optimizing platform utilization and lowering lifecycle costs. These converging shifts require procurement authorities and program managers to adopt flexible acquisition strategies, prioritize interoperability, and invest in workforce skills that support rapid systems engineering and sustainment in contested settings.
Assessment of how cumulative tariff and trade policy shifts through 2025 have reshaped supplier strategies, sourcing resilience, and procurement planning for radar systems
The cumulative impact of tariff policy changes and trade measures through 2025 has introduced new dynamics into radar supply chains and strategic sourcing. Heightened trade barriers have increased the incentive for defense primes and subsystem suppliers to reassess supplier footprints and to localize production of critical elements where feasible. As a result, procurement timelines have been affected by the need for additional qualification steps, alternative vendor vetting, and supply-chain contingency planning. These adjustments have not only influenced sourcing decisions but have also catalyzed investments in supplier resilience, dual sourcing of key RF components, and robust inventory management practices.
Furthermore, policy-driven shifts have reinforced the strategic importance of domestic advanced manufacturing capabilities for high-frequency radio components, power amplifiers, and specialized signal processing hardware. In parallel, export control regimes and tariff-driven cost pressures have promoted deeper collaboration between system integrators and national suppliers to secure access to controlled technologies. Consequently, program planners are incorporating policy risk into lifecycle planning, prioritizing modularity to insulate long-term capability delivery from short-term trade disruptions, and engaging early with certification and compliance stakeholders to mitigate procurement delays.
In-depth segmentation analysis revealing how deployment modes, component specialization, platform types, applications, and end-user priorities drive divergent capability and procurement needs
Key segmentation insights reveal varied performance expectations and procurement behaviors by deployment mode, component, platform type, application, and end user. Based on Deployment Mode, market dynamics contrast fixed installations that emphasize sustained high-power performance and wide-area coverage with mobile deployments that prioritize rapid emplacement, lower size-weight-and-power footprints, and networked handover capabilities. Based on Component, there is differentiated demand for advanced antennas and receiver chains that enable multi-beam operation, signal processors that handle high-throughput data, software that supports agile waveform management and adaptive filtering, as well as transmitters engineered for efficiency and thermal management. Based on Platform Type, the architecture trade-offs vary significantly between airborne systems that need to balance SWaP constraints with reach, ground-based systems that can employ larger apertures for long-range precision, and sea-based platforms that must account for platform motion and harsh maritime environments.
Based on Application, requirements diverge according to mission purpose: air surveillance functions demand persistent wide-area coverage and clutter rejection; data link capabilities emphasize secure, low-latency sharing across the battle network; early warning systems require long-range detection and rapid cueing; missile defense focuses on high-precision tracking and discrimination in short engagement windows; and target tracking requires continuous engagement control and handoff among sensors. Based on End User, investment profiles and procurement cycles differ as homeland security agencies prioritize cost-effective, interoperable systems for sovereignty and civil protection tasks, military users demand hardened, survivable architectures integrated within joint force command-and-control, and research institutions emphasize experimental platforms and modular open systems for technology maturation. Taken together, these segmentation axes illuminate where technology investments and procurement reforms are most likely to yield operational dividends and where tailored supplier strategies will be essential.
Regional capability priorities and procurement behaviors across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape interoperability and industrial partnerships
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on capability priorities, procurement strategies, and alliance-driven interoperability expectations. The Americas emphasize rapid integration with joint force networks, domestic production of critical components, and a focus on layered defense architectures that combine legacy systems with modernized radars. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa prioritize multinational interoperability, expeditionary readiness for geographically dispersed theaters, and the modernization of both fixed and mobile systems to cope with a broad spectrum of aerial threats. Asia-Pacific displays a pronounced appetite for scalable, networked radar solutions to address dense maritime and littoral environments, with significant investment in airborne and sea-based radar capabilities tailored to deterrence and area denial scenarios.
Across these regions, procurement pacing and industrial policy frameworks differ, driving varied approaches to supplier partnerships, joint ventures, and technology transfer. Moreover, alliance structures and regional threat perceptions shape system requirements, with interoperability and common data standards increasingly emphasized to enable coalition operations. Consequently, defense planners and industry partners must align technology roadmaps and engagement strategies to regional priorities while preserving flexibility for cross-region cooperation and rapid capability transfer when needed.
Strategic company-level behaviors highlighting modular product families, partnerships, and aftermarket services that are redefining competitive dynamics within the radar ecosystem
Leading companies in the radar ecosystem are recalibrating strategies to emphasize modular product families, open architectures, and partnerships that bridge systems integration with specialized subsystem expertise. Prime contractors are leveraging their systems-of-systems experience to offer end-to-end solutions that integrate sensors, command-and-control nodes, and sustainment services, while component suppliers focus on high-performance RF front ends, efficient transmitters, and advanced digital signal processors to meet rigorous military specifications. Startups and technology specialists are increasingly influential in areas such as AI-driven signal processing, novel antenna materials, and compact GaN amplifiers, prompting incumbent firms to pursue targeted acquisitions, strategic alliances, and co-development programs.
In the aftermarket and sustainment space, companies are expanding offerings around software lifecycle management, over-the-air updates, and predictive maintenance enabled by condition-based monitoring. This shift not only extends platform service life but also creates recurring revenue streams tied to software and data services. Furthermore, suppliers are investing in demonstrator programs and joint trials with defense customers to accelerate technology maturation and to validate performance in operationally representative conditions. Collectively, these company-level actions are reshaping competitive dynamics and creating opportunities for differentiated value propositions centered on modularity, rapid upgradeability, and total lifecycle support.
Concise actionable roadmap for industry leaders to operationalize modular architectures, supplier resilience, algorithm assurance, and workforce development for radar programs
Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable steps to align technology investments with operational imperatives and procurement realities. First, prioritize modular, software-upgradeable architectures that enable incremental capability insertion and reduce lifecycle risk. This approach allows programs to field advanced signal processing and waveform capabilities as they mature, rather than waiting for hardware refresh cycles. Second, strengthen supplier diversification and dual-sourcing strategies for critical RF and semiconductor components to mitigate policy-driven disruptions and to reduce single-vendor dependencies. Third, accelerate adoption of open standards and data formats to ensure interoperability across joint and coalition frameworks, thereby enabling sensor fusion and distributed engagement concepts.
Fourth, invest in demonstrator and pilot programs that validate AI-enhanced detection and tracking algorithms in representative operational environments, while concurrently establishing rigorous evaluation criteria for algorithm assurance and resilience to adversarial effects. Fifth, expand workforce development initiatives to close technical skill gaps in digital signal processing, RF engineering, and systems integration, ensuring that organizations can sustain rapid upgrade cycles. Sixth, foster cross-sector partnerships with commercial technology firms to leverage advances in high-performance computing, machine learning, and materials science. By implementing these measures, leaders can create adaptable programs that balance near-term readiness with long-term technological advantage.
Rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews, supply-chain mapping, technology readiness assessments, and scenario analysis to validate findings
The research methodology underpinning this executive summary combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to produce a robust, evidence-based view of the radar landscape. The approach began with a systematic review of open-source technical literature, defense white papers, and standards documents to identify emergent technologies and doctrinal shifts. This foundational work was complemented by structured interviews with subject-matter experts drawn from program offices, system integrators, component suppliers, and academic research groups, which provided insight into operational challenges, procurement constraints, and technology maturation timelines.
Additionally, the methodology incorporated supplier mapping and supply-chain risk assessments to understand vulnerabilities related to critical components and single-source dependencies. Technology readiness evaluations and capability gap analyses were performed to assess the relative maturity of key enablers such as wideband digital beamforming, GaN transmitters, and AI-assisted signal processing. Finally, scenario planning and sensitivity testing were used to explore how policy shifts, such as trade measures or export controls, could influence procurement strategies and industrial responses. Together, these mixed methods ensured findings are grounded in both practitioner experience and technical evidence.
Conclusive synthesis highlighting the imperative for modularity, interoperability, and integrated acquisition strategies to maintain resilient radar capabilities
In conclusion, the air and missile defense radar landscape is being reshaped by a convergence of technological innovation, evolving threat profiles, and shifting policy environments. Systems are moving toward distributed, software-defined architectures that emphasize interoperability, rapid upgradeability, and resilience against electronic and cyber threats. Procurement and industrial strategies are adapting accordingly, with greater attention paid to supplier diversification, domestic production capabilities for critical components, and lifecycle services that sustain capability over time. These changes require integrated planning across acquisition, engineering, and operations to ensure that capability delivery is both timely and adaptable.
Looking ahead, organizations that successfully marry modular hardware with advanced signal processing and interoperable data sharing will be best positioned to meet diverse mission requirements. Moreover, proactive engagement with policy trends and deliberate investments in workforce skills and supplier ecosystems will mitigate risk and create competitive advantage. Ultimately, a balanced strategy that addresses near-term operational gaps while enabling long-term technological evolution will be essential for maintaining credible and resilient radar-based air and missile defense capabilities.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction to the evolving imperatives for radar modernization, integrating modular architectures and mission-focused acquisition strategies for resilience
The opening of this executive summary frames the contemporary imperatives for air and missile defense radar capabilities amid accelerating threats and technological shifts. Across operational theaters, radars are no longer stand-alone sensors but nodes within integrated sensor-fusion ecosystems that demand higher fidelity, lower latency, and resilient performance under contested electromagnetic and cyber environments. Decision-makers face the dual challenge of modernizing legacy systems while incorporating emergent capabilities such as wideband digital beamforming and advanced electronic protection. Consequently, procurement and R&D strategies increasingly prioritize modular, software-defined architectures that enable iterative upgrades without wholesale system replacement.
Moreover, geopolitical competition has elevated the need for persistent situational awareness across multiple domains, requiring radar programs to balance strategic reach with tactical responsiveness. This balancing act is further complicated by constrained acquisition cycles, supply chain volatility, and evolving regulatory frameworks that influence component availability. Therefore, stakeholders must adopt an integrated approach that links capability roadmaps with supplier ecosystems, certification pathways, and mission-tailored performance metrics. In doing so, leaders can better position programs to meet immediate operational demands while maintaining adaptability for future threat vectors and doctrinal shifts.
Analysis of transformative technological and operational shifts reshaping radar detection paradigms, sensor fusion, and acquisition strategies for contested environments
The radar landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by rapid advances in both threat capabilities and enabling technologies. Increasingly sophisticated missile types, including maneuvering and low-observable weapons, are forcing a departure from single-sensor solutions toward distributed, networked sensor arrays that can sustain tracking and handoff across domains. At the same time, semiconductor advancements such as gallium nitride technologies and monolithic integration are enabling radars to achieve higher power efficiency, broader bandwidths, and greater thermal robustness, which together expand detection envelopes and improve countermeasure resistance.
Additionally, software-defined systems and open architectures are accelerating capability delivery cycles by allowing new signal processing algorithms to be fielded without major hardware refreshes. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have matured enough to augment signal discrimination and reduce false alarm rates, particularly in dense contact environments. Operationally, there is a clear move toward multi-mission platforms that can perform air surveillance, early warning, and target tracking in parallel, thereby optimizing platform utilization and lowering lifecycle costs. These converging shifts require procurement authorities and program managers to adopt flexible acquisition strategies, prioritize interoperability, and invest in workforce skills that support rapid systems engineering and sustainment in contested settings.
Assessment of how cumulative tariff and trade policy shifts through 2025 have reshaped supplier strategies, sourcing resilience, and procurement planning for radar systems
The cumulative impact of tariff policy changes and trade measures through 2025 has introduced new dynamics into radar supply chains and strategic sourcing. Heightened trade barriers have increased the incentive for defense primes and subsystem suppliers to reassess supplier footprints and to localize production of critical elements where feasible. As a result, procurement timelines have been affected by the need for additional qualification steps, alternative vendor vetting, and supply-chain contingency planning. These adjustments have not only influenced sourcing decisions but have also catalyzed investments in supplier resilience, dual sourcing of key RF components, and robust inventory management practices.
Furthermore, policy-driven shifts have reinforced the strategic importance of domestic advanced manufacturing capabilities for high-frequency radio components, power amplifiers, and specialized signal processing hardware. In parallel, export control regimes and tariff-driven cost pressures have promoted deeper collaboration between system integrators and national suppliers to secure access to controlled technologies. Consequently, program planners are incorporating policy risk into lifecycle planning, prioritizing modularity to insulate long-term capability delivery from short-term trade disruptions, and engaging early with certification and compliance stakeholders to mitigate procurement delays.
In-depth segmentation analysis revealing how deployment modes, component specialization, platform types, applications, and end-user priorities drive divergent capability and procurement needs
Key segmentation insights reveal varied performance expectations and procurement behaviors by deployment mode, component, platform type, application, and end user. Based on Deployment Mode, market dynamics contrast fixed installations that emphasize sustained high-power performance and wide-area coverage with mobile deployments that prioritize rapid emplacement, lower size-weight-and-power footprints, and networked handover capabilities. Based on Component, there is differentiated demand for advanced antennas and receiver chains that enable multi-beam operation, signal processors that handle high-throughput data, software that supports agile waveform management and adaptive filtering, as well as transmitters engineered for efficiency and thermal management. Based on Platform Type, the architecture trade-offs vary significantly between airborne systems that need to balance SWaP constraints with reach, ground-based systems that can employ larger apertures for long-range precision, and sea-based platforms that must account for platform motion and harsh maritime environments.
Based on Application, requirements diverge according to mission purpose: air surveillance functions demand persistent wide-area coverage and clutter rejection; data link capabilities emphasize secure, low-latency sharing across the battle network; early warning systems require long-range detection and rapid cueing; missile defense focuses on high-precision tracking and discrimination in short engagement windows; and target tracking requires continuous engagement control and handoff among sensors. Based on End User, investment profiles and procurement cycles differ as homeland security agencies prioritize cost-effective, interoperable systems for sovereignty and civil protection tasks, military users demand hardened, survivable architectures integrated within joint force command-and-control, and research institutions emphasize experimental platforms and modular open systems for technology maturation. Taken together, these segmentation axes illuminate where technology investments and procurement reforms are most likely to yield operational dividends and where tailored supplier strategies will be essential.
Regional capability priorities and procurement behaviors across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape interoperability and industrial partnerships
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on capability priorities, procurement strategies, and alliance-driven interoperability expectations. The Americas emphasize rapid integration with joint force networks, domestic production of critical components, and a focus on layered defense architectures that combine legacy systems with modernized radars. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa prioritize multinational interoperability, expeditionary readiness for geographically dispersed theaters, and the modernization of both fixed and mobile systems to cope with a broad spectrum of aerial threats. Asia-Pacific displays a pronounced appetite for scalable, networked radar solutions to address dense maritime and littoral environments, with significant investment in airborne and sea-based radar capabilities tailored to deterrence and area denial scenarios.
Across these regions, procurement pacing and industrial policy frameworks differ, driving varied approaches to supplier partnerships, joint ventures, and technology transfer. Moreover, alliance structures and regional threat perceptions shape system requirements, with interoperability and common data standards increasingly emphasized to enable coalition operations. Consequently, defense planners and industry partners must align technology roadmaps and engagement strategies to regional priorities while preserving flexibility for cross-region cooperation and rapid capability transfer when needed.
Strategic company-level behaviors highlighting modular product families, partnerships, and aftermarket services that are redefining competitive dynamics within the radar ecosystem
Leading companies in the radar ecosystem are recalibrating strategies to emphasize modular product families, open architectures, and partnerships that bridge systems integration with specialized subsystem expertise. Prime contractors are leveraging their systems-of-systems experience to offer end-to-end solutions that integrate sensors, command-and-control nodes, and sustainment services, while component suppliers focus on high-performance RF front ends, efficient transmitters, and advanced digital signal processors to meet rigorous military specifications. Startups and technology specialists are increasingly influential in areas such as AI-driven signal processing, novel antenna materials, and compact GaN amplifiers, prompting incumbent firms to pursue targeted acquisitions, strategic alliances, and co-development programs.
In the aftermarket and sustainment space, companies are expanding offerings around software lifecycle management, over-the-air updates, and predictive maintenance enabled by condition-based monitoring. This shift not only extends platform service life but also creates recurring revenue streams tied to software and data services. Furthermore, suppliers are investing in demonstrator programs and joint trials with defense customers to accelerate technology maturation and to validate performance in operationally representative conditions. Collectively, these company-level actions are reshaping competitive dynamics and creating opportunities for differentiated value propositions centered on modularity, rapid upgradeability, and total lifecycle support.
Concise actionable roadmap for industry leaders to operationalize modular architectures, supplier resilience, algorithm assurance, and workforce development for radar programs
Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable steps to align technology investments with operational imperatives and procurement realities. First, prioritize modular, software-upgradeable architectures that enable incremental capability insertion and reduce lifecycle risk. This approach allows programs to field advanced signal processing and waveform capabilities as they mature, rather than waiting for hardware refresh cycles. Second, strengthen supplier diversification and dual-sourcing strategies for critical RF and semiconductor components to mitigate policy-driven disruptions and to reduce single-vendor dependencies. Third, accelerate adoption of open standards and data formats to ensure interoperability across joint and coalition frameworks, thereby enabling sensor fusion and distributed engagement concepts.
Fourth, invest in demonstrator and pilot programs that validate AI-enhanced detection and tracking algorithms in representative operational environments, while concurrently establishing rigorous evaluation criteria for algorithm assurance and resilience to adversarial effects. Fifth, expand workforce development initiatives to close technical skill gaps in digital signal processing, RF engineering, and systems integration, ensuring that organizations can sustain rapid upgrade cycles. Sixth, foster cross-sector partnerships with commercial technology firms to leverage advances in high-performance computing, machine learning, and materials science. By implementing these measures, leaders can create adaptable programs that balance near-term readiness with long-term technological advantage.
Rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews, supply-chain mapping, technology readiness assessments, and scenario analysis to validate findings
The research methodology underpinning this executive summary combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to produce a robust, evidence-based view of the radar landscape. The approach began with a systematic review of open-source technical literature, defense white papers, and standards documents to identify emergent technologies and doctrinal shifts. This foundational work was complemented by structured interviews with subject-matter experts drawn from program offices, system integrators, component suppliers, and academic research groups, which provided insight into operational challenges, procurement constraints, and technology maturation timelines.
Additionally, the methodology incorporated supplier mapping and supply-chain risk assessments to understand vulnerabilities related to critical components and single-source dependencies. Technology readiness evaluations and capability gap analyses were performed to assess the relative maturity of key enablers such as wideband digital beamforming, GaN transmitters, and AI-assisted signal processing. Finally, scenario planning and sensitivity testing were used to explore how policy shifts, such as trade measures or export controls, could influence procurement strategies and industrial responses. Together, these mixed methods ensured findings are grounded in both practitioner experience and technical evidence.
Conclusive synthesis highlighting the imperative for modularity, interoperability, and integrated acquisition strategies to maintain resilient radar capabilities
In conclusion, the air and missile defense radar landscape is being reshaped by a convergence of technological innovation, evolving threat profiles, and shifting policy environments. Systems are moving toward distributed, software-defined architectures that emphasize interoperability, rapid upgradeability, and resilience against electronic and cyber threats. Procurement and industrial strategies are adapting accordingly, with greater attention paid to supplier diversification, domestic production capabilities for critical components, and lifecycle services that sustain capability over time. These changes require integrated planning across acquisition, engineering, and operations to ensure that capability delivery is both timely and adaptable.
Looking ahead, organizations that successfully marry modular hardware with advanced signal processing and interoperable data sharing will be best positioned to meet diverse mission requirements. Moreover, proactive engagement with policy trends and deliberate investments in workforce skills and supplier ecosystems will mitigate risk and create competitive advantage. Ultimately, a balanced strategy that addresses near-term operational gaps while enabling long-term technological evolution will be essential for maintaining credible and resilient radar-based air and missile defense capabilities.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms for real-time target detection and classification in tactical radar systems
- 5.2. Development of gallium nitride semiconductor technology to enhance radar power efficiency and detection range in high-threat environments
- 5.3. Implementation of sensor fusion architectures combining radar, electronic warfare, and infrared data for comprehensive air and missile defense situational awareness
- 5.4. Adoption of netcentric networked radar systems enabling secure cross-domain data sharing in multinational air defense operations
- 5.5. Deployment of digital twin models and predictive maintenance analytics to optimize radar system readiness and reduce lifecycle costs
- 5.6. Advancements in passive radar techniques using noncooperative illuminators to detect stealth and low-observable aerial targets
- 5.7. Integration of 5G and high-bandwidth communication links into mobile radar platforms for rapid data transmission and remote control
- 5.8. Focus on counter-hypersonic missile detection capabilities with high-frequency X-band and Ku-band radar enhancements for early warning
- 5.9. Collaboration between defense contractors and commercial technology firms to develop open architecture radar software for rapid upgrades
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Air & Missile Defense Radar Market, by Deployment Mode
- 8.1. Fixed
- 8.2. Mobile
- 9. Air & Missile Defense Radar Market, by Component
- 9.1. Antenna
- 9.2. Receiver
- 9.3. Signal Processor
- 9.4. Software
- 9.5. Transmitter
- 10. Air & Missile Defense Radar Market, by Platform Type
- 10.1. Airborne
- 10.2. Ground Based
- 10.3. Sea Based
- 11. Air & Missile Defense Radar Market, by Application
- 11.1. Air Surveillance
- 11.2. Data Link
- 11.3. Early Warning
- 11.4. Missile Defense
- 11.5. Target Tracking
- 12. Air & Missile Defense Radar Market, by End User
- 12.1. Homeland Security
- 12.2. Military
- 12.3. Research Institutions
- 13. Air & Missile Defense Radar Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Air & Missile Defense Radar Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Air & Missile Defense Radar Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- 16.3.2. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 16.3.3. Thales S.A.
- 16.3.4. Leonardo S.p.A.
- 16.3.5. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 16.3.6. Saab AB
- 16.3.7. BAE Systems plc
- 16.3.8. Hensoldt AG
- 16.3.9. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
- 16.3.10. Hanwha Systems Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.11. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
