Agrochemicals Market by Product Type (Fungicides, Herbicides, Insecticides), Nature (Biopesticides, Synthetic Pesticides), Crop Type, Formulation, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Agrochemicals Market was valued at USD 86.26 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 91.00 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.59%, reaching USD 143.79 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction presenting the contemporary agrochemical environment shaped by innovation, regulations, supply chain dynamics, and farmer adoption trends
This executive summary opens with a concise orientation to the contemporary agrochemical environment, where product innovation, regulatory pressure, and shifting agronomic practices converge to redefine decision criteria across the value chain. Farmers and distributors increasingly evaluate inputs not solely on efficacy and cost, but on environmental footprint, resistance management profiles, and compatibility with integrated pest management approaches. Meanwhile, formulation science and delivery technologies are advancing to address application efficiency and farmer convenience, which in turn influences adoption behavior and channel dynamics.
As stakeholders adapt, supply chain resilience and procurement strategies have moved to the foreground. Sourcing volatility, logistics constraints, and regional regulatory divergence compel manufacturers and formulators to reassess upstream dependencies and to prioritise diversified supplier networks. At the same time, digital agronomy tools and precision application systems are reshaping product use patterns and enabling more targeted dosing, which supports both sustainability objectives and farm-level profitability. Taken together, these forces create a complex but navigable landscape for commercial leaders and policy makers seeking to align innovation with regulatory compliance and market access.
Transformative shifts reshaping the agrochemical industry driven by biological innovation, digital agronomy, sustainability imperatives, and regulatory tightening
The agrochemical landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by the interplay of scientific innovation, stricter regulatory frameworks, and changing end-user expectations. Biologically derived solutions and advanced chemistries are gaining traction as developers focus on specificity, lower environmental persistence, and improved safety profiles. Concurrently, regulatory bodies are raising thresholds for environmental and human health risk assessment, which accelerates the need for robust toxico-kinetic data and adaptive registration strategies.
In addition, digital agronomy and precision application tools are altering demand patterns by enabling more efficient use of active ingredients and by promoting integrated approaches that combine chemical and non-chemical controls. Supply chain realignment is another consequential trend: manufacturers are localising critical stages of production and investing in formulation facilities closer to major crop production zones to mitigate logistic risks and tariff exposure. Sustainability commitments from large buyers and procurement policies now increasingly influence product design and commercial terms, compelling firms to prioritise life cycle transparency and stewardship programmes. These shifts collectively redefine competitive advantage and create opportunities for firms that can rapidly integrate scientific, regulatory, and commercial capabilities.
Assessment of cumulative trade and tariff influences on agrochemical supply chains highlighting procurement realignment, production localisation, and strategic resilience measures
United States tariff measures and associated trade policy adjustments have exerted material influence on global agrochemical flows, procurement strategies, and the geography of production. Tariff-induced cost differentials have prompted manufacturers to reassess plant footprints, with some electing to regionalise production and others to absorb margin pressures while prioritising continuity of supply. Moreover, tariff uncertainty often translates into extended lead times and inventory stockpiling, which affects working capital management across the supply chain.
Beyond immediate cost implications, tariffs have secondary effects on innovation pathways and strategic partnerships. For instance, where import duties raise the landed cost of key intermediates or finished formulations, firms accelerate efforts to qualify alternative suppliers, substitute active ingredients where permissible, or invest in local synthesis capacity. In parallel, distributors and retailers adjust sourcing and promotional strategies to maintain competitive retailer pricing without undermining long-term channel relationships. Finally, the cumulative impact of tariff actions tends to amplify regional divergence in product availability and regulatory alignment, making cross-border product launches and harmonised stewardship programmes more complex to execute. Stakeholders that adopt scenario-based procurement planning and flexible manufacturing arrangements will be better positioned to absorb these impacts.
Segmentation-driven analysis revealing how product typologies, biotic and synthetic classifications, crop applications, and formulation formats determine commercial and regulatory priorities
Detailed segmentation sheds light on how distinct product categories, formulation formats, and crop applications influence R&D prioritisation, sales strategies, and regulatory engagement. Based on Product Type, the market spans Fungicides, Herbicides, Insecticides, and Rodenticides, with fungicide subfamilies such as Dithiocarbamates, Strobilurins, and Triazoles commanding different resistance management and application profiles. Herbicides include both Post Emergent and Pre Emergent chemistries, and the Post Emergent class further divides into Non Selective and Selective modes of action that dictate crop safety and use-case scenarios. Insecticides are differentiated across Carbamates, Neonicotinoids, Organophosphates, and Pyrethroids, each presenting distinct efficacy, residue, and stewardship considerations. Rodenticides are segmented into Anticoagulants and Non Anticoagulants, with divergent regulatory scrutiny and end-user handling requirements.
Based on Nature, the market separates Biopesticides and Synthetic Pesticides; within Biopesticides, categories such as Biochemicals, Microbial agents, and Plant Extracts carry unique registration pathways and supply chain models that influence time-to-market. Based on Crop Type, product demand and formulation choices vary across Cereals And Grains, Fruits And Vegetables, and Oilseeds And Pulses, reflecting differences in agronomy, residue tolerance, and seasonality. Based on Formulation, Dry Formulations and Liquid Formulations define distribution, storage, and application logistics: dry forms include Dustable Powders, Granules, Soluble Powders, Water Dispersible Granules, and Wettable Powders, while liquid formats encompass Emulsifiable Concentrates, Soluble Liquids, Suspension Concentrates, and Suspo Emulsions. Each segmentation axis drives distinct commercial and regulatory imperatives, and together they inform prioritisation of product pipelines and go-to-market models.
Regional perspectives highlighting how distinct regulatory regimes, cropping systems, and distribution models shape demand, access, and innovation pathways across global markets
Regional dynamics continue to shape product development choices, market access strategies, and distribution investments across geographies with divergent regulatory regimes and agronomic profiles. The Americas exhibit a mix of large-scale row crop systems that emphasize mechanised application and cost-competitive chemistries, while demand for stewardship programmes and resistance management drives innovation adoption in high-value horticulture segments. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa reflect a complex mosaic where stringent environmental standards, harmonised regulatory processes in some jurisdictions, and resource constraints in others produce heterogeneous adoption patterns and differentiated market entry tactics.
Meanwhile, the Asia-Pacific region is characterised by a combination of rapidly modernising agricultural practices, high crop diversity, and strong interest in biologicals and formulation innovations suited to smallholder use. Across these regions, distributors and local formulators play pivotal roles in translating product labels into practical application guidance, and regulatory timing frequently determines first-to-market advantages. Therefore, strategic regional investments in registration science, local manufacturing capacity, and tailored stewardship initiatives remain essential to secure durable market positions and to navigate the interplay between global supply chains and regional policy frameworks.
Company-level intelligence describing how leading participants prioritise portfolio optimisation, collaborative R&D, channel development, and operational resilience to sustain competitiveness
Company strategies in the agrochemical sector increasingly converge around three core pillars: portfolio rationalisation, collaborative innovation, and downstream channel strengthening. Firms are refining pipelines to prioritise chemistries and biologicals that align with regulatory trends and end-user sustainability criteria, while rationalisation often involves divesting non-core assets or reorienting resources toward high-impact research programmes. Collaboration has evolved beyond simple licensing; it now includes co-development agreements, shared manufacturing ventures, and data partnerships that accelerate registration dossiers and broaden geographic reach.
At the same time, companies are intensifying focus on commercial execution by strengthening relationships with distributors, deploying digital platforms for agronomic advisory, and investing in field trials that demonstrate both efficacy and stewardship benefits. Capital allocation reflects a dual emphasis on near-term commercial wins and longer-term capability building in formulation science and microbial product development. Operationally, leaders are standardising quality protocols, enhancing traceability across supply chains, and instituting scenario planning to respond to regulatory and trade disruptions. Collectively, these strategic tendencies create a competitive environment in which agility, regulatory foresight, and partner ecosystems determine whether firms can sustainably capture market opportunities.
Actionable strategic imperatives for companies to enhance supply chain flexibility, expedite sustainable product development, embed digital stewardship, and strengthen regulatory readiness
Industry leaders can pursue a pragmatic set of actions to convert market complexity into commercial advantage. First, strengthening supply chain flexibility by diversifying sources of key intermediates, co-locating critical operations near major demand centers, and implementing dynamic inventory strategies will reduce exposure to tariff and logistic disruptions. Second, accelerating investment in biologicals and next-generation formulations that reduce environmental persistence and improve application efficiency will meet both regulatory expectations and buyer sustainability requirements. Third, embedding digital agronomy and data-driven stewardship into commercial offerings enhances product differentiation and supports farmer adoption through measurable on-farm outcomes.
In tandem, firms should prioritise regulatory intelligence capabilities to streamline registration pathways and to engage proactively with authorities on risk mitigation and residue policies. Strategic partnerships with distributors and independent service providers will expand market reach while localising technical support. Finally, adopting scenario-based planning and clear contingency playbooks for tariff and trade shifts will enable executives to respond swiftly to policy changes. When combined, these measures create a resilient operating model that preserves commercial momentum while advancing long-term industry transitions toward safer, more efficient crop protection.
Transparent multi-method research methodology encompassing primary interviews, secondary evidence synthesis, triangulation, and scenario analysis to ensure robust and validated insights
The research employed a multi-method approach to ensure analytic rigor and validity, integrating primary interviews, secondary source synthesis, and cross-validation techniques. Primary research comprised structured interviews with senior R&D leaders, commercial directors, formulators, and channel partners to capture operational realities, registration challenges, and go-to-market dynamics. Secondary research drew on public regulatory filings, scientific journals, patent records, and trade publications to contextualise technological trajectories and policy developments.
Analytical methods included segmentation mapping, SWOT-style evaluation across product and regional axes, and scenario analysis to assess tariff and trade contingencies. Quality assurance was achieved via triangulation, whereby insights from interviews were compared with documentary evidence and independent technical literature. Where relevant, laboratory formulation parameters and application efficacy claims were reviewed against peer-reviewed studies and extension service data. Finally, limitations and assumptions have been documented so that readers can interpret conclusions with appropriate context, and stakeholders are encouraged to request methodological appendices for further transparency.
Conclusive synthesis summarising strategic implications, core priorities, and risk considerations for stakeholders navigating the evolving agrochemical landscape
In conclusion, the agrochemical sector stands at a strategic inflection point where innovation, regulatory evolution, and supply chain realignment intersect. Firms that emphasise sustainable chemistries and biological solutions, invest in localisation and formulation capabilities, and integrate digital agronomy into commercial propositions will be better positioned to capture long-term value. Equally important is the ability to anticipate and adapt to trade and tariff dynamics that influence cost structures and market access, while maintaining a disciplined focus on stewardship to preserve efficacy and regulatory standing.
Stakeholders should prioritise pragmatic investment in registration science, local manufacturing resilience, and partnership ecosystems that connect product development with on-the-ground agronomic adoption. By combining prudent operational measures with strategic innovation, organisations can navigate present uncertainties and emerge with stronger market propositions and enhanced risk management. The recommendations presented herein are intended to guide executives and technical leaders as they balance near-term commercial needs with the imperative to drive sustainable and effective crop protection solutions.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction presenting the contemporary agrochemical environment shaped by innovation, regulations, supply chain dynamics, and farmer adoption trends
This executive summary opens with a concise orientation to the contemporary agrochemical environment, where product innovation, regulatory pressure, and shifting agronomic practices converge to redefine decision criteria across the value chain. Farmers and distributors increasingly evaluate inputs not solely on efficacy and cost, but on environmental footprint, resistance management profiles, and compatibility with integrated pest management approaches. Meanwhile, formulation science and delivery technologies are advancing to address application efficiency and farmer convenience, which in turn influences adoption behavior and channel dynamics.
As stakeholders adapt, supply chain resilience and procurement strategies have moved to the foreground. Sourcing volatility, logistics constraints, and regional regulatory divergence compel manufacturers and formulators to reassess upstream dependencies and to prioritise diversified supplier networks. At the same time, digital agronomy tools and precision application systems are reshaping product use patterns and enabling more targeted dosing, which supports both sustainability objectives and farm-level profitability. Taken together, these forces create a complex but navigable landscape for commercial leaders and policy makers seeking to align innovation with regulatory compliance and market access.
Transformative shifts reshaping the agrochemical industry driven by biological innovation, digital agronomy, sustainability imperatives, and regulatory tightening
The agrochemical landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by the interplay of scientific innovation, stricter regulatory frameworks, and changing end-user expectations. Biologically derived solutions and advanced chemistries are gaining traction as developers focus on specificity, lower environmental persistence, and improved safety profiles. Concurrently, regulatory bodies are raising thresholds for environmental and human health risk assessment, which accelerates the need for robust toxico-kinetic data and adaptive registration strategies.
In addition, digital agronomy and precision application tools are altering demand patterns by enabling more efficient use of active ingredients and by promoting integrated approaches that combine chemical and non-chemical controls. Supply chain realignment is another consequential trend: manufacturers are localising critical stages of production and investing in formulation facilities closer to major crop production zones to mitigate logistic risks and tariff exposure. Sustainability commitments from large buyers and procurement policies now increasingly influence product design and commercial terms, compelling firms to prioritise life cycle transparency and stewardship programmes. These shifts collectively redefine competitive advantage and create opportunities for firms that can rapidly integrate scientific, regulatory, and commercial capabilities.
Assessment of cumulative trade and tariff influences on agrochemical supply chains highlighting procurement realignment, production localisation, and strategic resilience measures
United States tariff measures and associated trade policy adjustments have exerted material influence on global agrochemical flows, procurement strategies, and the geography of production. Tariff-induced cost differentials have prompted manufacturers to reassess plant footprints, with some electing to regionalise production and others to absorb margin pressures while prioritising continuity of supply. Moreover, tariff uncertainty often translates into extended lead times and inventory stockpiling, which affects working capital management across the supply chain.
Beyond immediate cost implications, tariffs have secondary effects on innovation pathways and strategic partnerships. For instance, where import duties raise the landed cost of key intermediates or finished formulations, firms accelerate efforts to qualify alternative suppliers, substitute active ingredients where permissible, or invest in local synthesis capacity. In parallel, distributors and retailers adjust sourcing and promotional strategies to maintain competitive retailer pricing without undermining long-term channel relationships. Finally, the cumulative impact of tariff actions tends to amplify regional divergence in product availability and regulatory alignment, making cross-border product launches and harmonised stewardship programmes more complex to execute. Stakeholders that adopt scenario-based procurement planning and flexible manufacturing arrangements will be better positioned to absorb these impacts.
Segmentation-driven analysis revealing how product typologies, biotic and synthetic classifications, crop applications, and formulation formats determine commercial and regulatory priorities
Detailed segmentation sheds light on how distinct product categories, formulation formats, and crop applications influence R&D prioritisation, sales strategies, and regulatory engagement. Based on Product Type, the market spans Fungicides, Herbicides, Insecticides, and Rodenticides, with fungicide subfamilies such as Dithiocarbamates, Strobilurins, and Triazoles commanding different resistance management and application profiles. Herbicides include both Post Emergent and Pre Emergent chemistries, and the Post Emergent class further divides into Non Selective and Selective modes of action that dictate crop safety and use-case scenarios. Insecticides are differentiated across Carbamates, Neonicotinoids, Organophosphates, and Pyrethroids, each presenting distinct efficacy, residue, and stewardship considerations. Rodenticides are segmented into Anticoagulants and Non Anticoagulants, with divergent regulatory scrutiny and end-user handling requirements.
Based on Nature, the market separates Biopesticides and Synthetic Pesticides; within Biopesticides, categories such as Biochemicals, Microbial agents, and Plant Extracts carry unique registration pathways and supply chain models that influence time-to-market. Based on Crop Type, product demand and formulation choices vary across Cereals And Grains, Fruits And Vegetables, and Oilseeds And Pulses, reflecting differences in agronomy, residue tolerance, and seasonality. Based on Formulation, Dry Formulations and Liquid Formulations define distribution, storage, and application logistics: dry forms include Dustable Powders, Granules, Soluble Powders, Water Dispersible Granules, and Wettable Powders, while liquid formats encompass Emulsifiable Concentrates, Soluble Liquids, Suspension Concentrates, and Suspo Emulsions. Each segmentation axis drives distinct commercial and regulatory imperatives, and together they inform prioritisation of product pipelines and go-to-market models.
Regional perspectives highlighting how distinct regulatory regimes, cropping systems, and distribution models shape demand, access, and innovation pathways across global markets
Regional dynamics continue to shape product development choices, market access strategies, and distribution investments across geographies with divergent regulatory regimes and agronomic profiles. The Americas exhibit a mix of large-scale row crop systems that emphasize mechanised application and cost-competitive chemistries, while demand for stewardship programmes and resistance management drives innovation adoption in high-value horticulture segments. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa reflect a complex mosaic where stringent environmental standards, harmonised regulatory processes in some jurisdictions, and resource constraints in others produce heterogeneous adoption patterns and differentiated market entry tactics.
Meanwhile, the Asia-Pacific region is characterised by a combination of rapidly modernising agricultural practices, high crop diversity, and strong interest in biologicals and formulation innovations suited to smallholder use. Across these regions, distributors and local formulators play pivotal roles in translating product labels into practical application guidance, and regulatory timing frequently determines first-to-market advantages. Therefore, strategic regional investments in registration science, local manufacturing capacity, and tailored stewardship initiatives remain essential to secure durable market positions and to navigate the interplay between global supply chains and regional policy frameworks.
Company-level intelligence describing how leading participants prioritise portfolio optimisation, collaborative R&D, channel development, and operational resilience to sustain competitiveness
Company strategies in the agrochemical sector increasingly converge around three core pillars: portfolio rationalisation, collaborative innovation, and downstream channel strengthening. Firms are refining pipelines to prioritise chemistries and biologicals that align with regulatory trends and end-user sustainability criteria, while rationalisation often involves divesting non-core assets or reorienting resources toward high-impact research programmes. Collaboration has evolved beyond simple licensing; it now includes co-development agreements, shared manufacturing ventures, and data partnerships that accelerate registration dossiers and broaden geographic reach.
At the same time, companies are intensifying focus on commercial execution by strengthening relationships with distributors, deploying digital platforms for agronomic advisory, and investing in field trials that demonstrate both efficacy and stewardship benefits. Capital allocation reflects a dual emphasis on near-term commercial wins and longer-term capability building in formulation science and microbial product development. Operationally, leaders are standardising quality protocols, enhancing traceability across supply chains, and instituting scenario planning to respond to regulatory and trade disruptions. Collectively, these strategic tendencies create a competitive environment in which agility, regulatory foresight, and partner ecosystems determine whether firms can sustainably capture market opportunities.
Actionable strategic imperatives for companies to enhance supply chain flexibility, expedite sustainable product development, embed digital stewardship, and strengthen regulatory readiness
Industry leaders can pursue a pragmatic set of actions to convert market complexity into commercial advantage. First, strengthening supply chain flexibility by diversifying sources of key intermediates, co-locating critical operations near major demand centers, and implementing dynamic inventory strategies will reduce exposure to tariff and logistic disruptions. Second, accelerating investment in biologicals and next-generation formulations that reduce environmental persistence and improve application efficiency will meet both regulatory expectations and buyer sustainability requirements. Third, embedding digital agronomy and data-driven stewardship into commercial offerings enhances product differentiation and supports farmer adoption through measurable on-farm outcomes.
In tandem, firms should prioritise regulatory intelligence capabilities to streamline registration pathways and to engage proactively with authorities on risk mitigation and residue policies. Strategic partnerships with distributors and independent service providers will expand market reach while localising technical support. Finally, adopting scenario-based planning and clear contingency playbooks for tariff and trade shifts will enable executives to respond swiftly to policy changes. When combined, these measures create a resilient operating model that preserves commercial momentum while advancing long-term industry transitions toward safer, more efficient crop protection.
Transparent multi-method research methodology encompassing primary interviews, secondary evidence synthesis, triangulation, and scenario analysis to ensure robust and validated insights
The research employed a multi-method approach to ensure analytic rigor and validity, integrating primary interviews, secondary source synthesis, and cross-validation techniques. Primary research comprised structured interviews with senior R&D leaders, commercial directors, formulators, and channel partners to capture operational realities, registration challenges, and go-to-market dynamics. Secondary research drew on public regulatory filings, scientific journals, patent records, and trade publications to contextualise technological trajectories and policy developments.
Analytical methods included segmentation mapping, SWOT-style evaluation across product and regional axes, and scenario analysis to assess tariff and trade contingencies. Quality assurance was achieved via triangulation, whereby insights from interviews were compared with documentary evidence and independent technical literature. Where relevant, laboratory formulation parameters and application efficacy claims were reviewed against peer-reviewed studies and extension service data. Finally, limitations and assumptions have been documented so that readers can interpret conclusions with appropriate context, and stakeholders are encouraged to request methodological appendices for further transparency.
Conclusive synthesis summarising strategic implications, core priorities, and risk considerations for stakeholders navigating the evolving agrochemical landscape
In conclusion, the agrochemical sector stands at a strategic inflection point where innovation, regulatory evolution, and supply chain realignment intersect. Firms that emphasise sustainable chemistries and biological solutions, invest in localisation and formulation capabilities, and integrate digital agronomy into commercial propositions will be better positioned to capture long-term value. Equally important is the ability to anticipate and adapt to trade and tariff dynamics that influence cost structures and market access, while maintaining a disciplined focus on stewardship to preserve efficacy and regulatory standing.
Stakeholders should prioritise pragmatic investment in registration science, local manufacturing resilience, and partnership ecosystems that connect product development with on-the-ground agronomic adoption. By combining prudent operational measures with strategic innovation, organisations can navigate present uncertainties and emerge with stronger market propositions and enhanced risk management. The recommendations presented herein are intended to guide executives and technical leaders as they balance near-term commercial needs with the imperative to drive sustainable and effective crop protection solutions.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Increasing use of microbial and biochemical biopesticides to reduce chemical residue and environmental impact
- 5.2. Development of nanoformulations in agrochemicals for enhanced delivery and reduced application rates
- 5.3. Emergence of digital farming platforms integrating satellite data for targeted pesticide and fertilizer management
- 5.4. Growing regulatory restriction on neonicotinoids driving reformulation toward alternative seed treatment chemistries
- 5.5. Shift toward integrated pest management combining chemical biological and cultural practices to ensure sustainability
- 5.6. Increasing investment in herbicide tolerant crop traits to optimize selectivity and minimize off target chemical drift
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Agrochemicals Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Fungicides
- 8.1.1. Dithiocarbamates
- 8.1.2. Strobilurins
- 8.1.3. Triazoles
- 8.2. Herbicides
- 8.2.1. Post Emergent
- 8.2.1.1. Non Selective
- 8.2.1.2. Selective
- 8.2.2. Pre Emergent
- 8.3. Insecticides
- 8.3.1. Carbamates
- 8.3.2. Neonicotinoids
- 8.3.3. Organophosphates
- 8.3.4. Pyrethroids
- 8.4. Rodenticides
- 8.4.1. Anticoagulants
- 8.4.2. Non Anticoagulants
- 9. Agrochemicals Market, by Nature
- 9.1. Biopesticides
- 9.1.1. Biochemicals
- 9.1.2. Microbial
- 9.1.3. Plant Extracts
- 9.2. Synthetic Pesticides
- 10. Agrochemicals Market, by Crop Type
- 10.1. Cereals And Grains
- 10.2. Fruits And Vegetables
- 10.3. Oilseeds And Pulses
- 11. Agrochemicals Market, by Formulation
- 11.1. Dry Formulations
- 11.1.1. Dustable Powders
- 11.1.2. Granules
- 11.1.3. Soluble Powders
- 11.1.4. Water Dispersible Granules
- 11.1.5. Wettable Powders
- 11.2. Liquid Formulations
- 11.2.1. Emulsifiable Concentrates
- 11.2.2. Soluble Liquids
- 11.2.3. Suspension Concentrates
- 11.2.4. Suspo Emulsions
- 12. Agrochemicals Market, by Application
- 12.1. Fertilizers
- 12.2. Insecticides
- 12.3. Herbicides
- 12.4. Fungicides
- 12.5. Rodenticides
- 13. Agrochemicals Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Agrochemicals Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Agrochemicals Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. ADAMA Agricultural Solutions Limited
- 16.3.2. AgroFresh Solutions, Inc.
- 16.3.3. American Vanguard Corporation
- 16.3.4. BASF SE
- 16.3.5. Bayer AG
- 16.3.6. CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
- 16.3.7. Corteva, Inc.
- 16.3.8. CVR Partners, LP
- 16.3.9. Dow AgroSciences LLC
- 16.3.10. Drexel Chemical Company
- 16.3.11. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 16.3.12. ELS Products Corp
- 16.3.13. EuroChem Group
- 16.3.14. Gowan Group
- 16.3.15. Intrepid Potash, Inc.
- 16.3.16. Israel Chemicals Limited
- 16.3.17. Mitsui Chemicals Agro, Inc.
- 16.3.18. Nufarm Ltd.
- 16.3.19. PBI-Gordon Corporation
- 16.3.20. SQM SA
- 16.3.21. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.22. Syngenta AG
- 16.3.23. The Chemical Company
- 16.3.24. The Mosaic Company
- 16.3.25. UPL Limited
- 16.3.26. Yara International ASA
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
